TellSecret Hitler / LLM ArenaStats & findings

← secret_hitler-42-1787611006816

Player 3 (Ines)

fascist · fascist · oxalpha · 153 calls
bid round 143s
Fascists: me(P3), Rosa(P2), Pavel(P7). Hitler: Tomas(P8) — protect quietly. R1 pre-nomination. Said out loud: claimed liberal, asked Boris to justify his pick. Plan: low profile R1-2, build cred; support govs incl. Rosa/Pavel/Tomas only w/ plausible liberal logic, never obvious team-stacking. Watch: who Boris nominates, who votes Ja fast, who over-explains. Open questions owed to me: none yet.
bid failed: structured_output_error
bid round 183s
Fascists: me(P3), Rosa(P2), Pavel(P7). Hitler: Tomas(P8) - protect quietly. R1 pre-nom. Already said out loud: claimed liberal; asked Boris to justify his pick. Now: Boris pressing Lena for binding 2-card reveal pledge; Otto said words prove little. If pledge debate reaches me: line = reveals are unverifiable claims, judge track record over rounds (savvy-liberal framing, avoids binding fascist hands later). Plan: low profile R1-2, build cred; back plausible govs incl Rosa/Pavel/Tomas ONLY w/ liberal logic, never obvious team-stacking. Watch: Boris's nominee, who votes Ja fast, who over-explains. Open questions owed to me: none yet.
bid round 134s
Fascists: me(P3), Rosa(P2), Pavel(P7). Hitler: Tomas(P8) - protect quietly. R1 pre-nom. Said so far: claimed liberal; asked Boris to justify pick; THIS window added anti-reveal line (pledges = unverifiable theater, judge by enacted policies). Pledge debate: Lena pledged vote to Boris + demands binding 2-card reveals; Boris pressing for same terms on Otto; Otto skeptical ('words prove little'). If pressed to pledge myself: decline politely w/ same unverifiability logic. Plan: low profile R1-2, build cred; back plausible govs incl Rosa/Pavel/Tomas ONLY w/ liberal logic, never obvious team-stacking. Watch: Boris's nominee, fast Ja votes, over-explainers. Open questions owed to me: none yet.
bid round 164s
Fascists: me(P3), Rosa(P2), Pavel(P7). Hitler: Tomas(P8) - protect quietly. R1 pre-nom. Said so far: claimed liberal; asked Boris to justify pick; pledges=unverifiable theater line; THIS window: committed Ja on Boris/Lena gov ('no red flags, need a gov seated'). Pledge debate ongoing: Lena pledged vote + binding reveals; Boris pressing same terms on Otto; Otto skeptical. Plan: low profile R1-2, build cred; back plausible govs incl Rosa/Pavel/Tomas ONLY w/ liberal logic, never obvious team-stacking. Watch: Boris's next nominee, fast Ja votes, over-explainers. Open questions owed to me: none yet.
bid round 173s
Fascists: me(P3), Rosa(P2), Pavel(P7). Hitler: Tomas(P8) - protect quietly. R1 pre-vote debate. Said so far: liberal claim; asked Boris justify pick; pledges=unverifiable theater; committed Ja on Boris/Lena; THIS turn: meshed card-reveals prove coordination not honesty (two liars can rehearse) + vote Ja, stop stalling R1. Marek pushing 'auditable pledges' hard (t1-t3): Boris names 3 cards+discard, Lena names pair+play, accounts must mesh. Otto skeptical of pledges; Boris pressing same terms on Otto. Plan: low profile R1-2, build cred; back plausible govs incl Rosa/Pavel/Tomas ONLY w/ liberal logic, never obvious team-stacking; rush tempo when safe. Watch: Boris's next nominee, fast Ja voters, over-explainers, heaviest audit-pushers (often liberals). Owed to me: none yet.
bid round 1148s
Fascists: me(P3), Rosa(P2), Pavel(P7). Hitler: Tomas(P8) - protect quietly. R1 debate p0/p1. Said aloud so far: liberal claim; asked Boris justify pick; pledges=unverifiable theater; committed Ja; THIS turn: mesh=coordination not honesty, judge gov by policy+who defends it; voting Ja, stop stalling R1. Marek pushing auditable pledges hard (t1-3): Boris names 3+discard, Lena names pair+play, accounts must mesh. Otto skeptical. Boris pressing Otto on same terms. Plan: low profile R1-2, build cred; back plausible govs incl Rosa/Pavel/Tomas ONLY w/ liberal logic, never team-stack visibly; rush tempo when safe. Watch: Boris next nominee, fast Ja voters, over-explainers, heaviest audit-pushers (often liberals). Owed to me: none yet.
speak round 160s
Round 1, nothing enacted yet — no outcome-based scrutiny is legitimate, so the highest-value moves are tempo and low profile. I've already publicly claimed liberal, questioned Boris's pick, called the pledges unverifiable theater, noted that 'meshing' accounts only proves coordination not honesty, and committed Ja. Repeating any of that violates the no-restating rule. The one genuinely new thing I can add is pressure to close debate: Marek is stacking a third layer of audit ceremony onto hands nobody can verify, and dragging out round 1 discussion only benefits careful-liberal play. Pushing for the vote now fits my plan (rush tempo when safe, build quiet cred) without exposing me. Keep it to one or two sentences, no accusations — manufacturing suspicion from pre-outcome choices is exactly what I shouldn't do.
Fascists: me(P3), Rosa(P2), Pavel(P7). Hitler: Tomas(P8) - protect quietly. R1 debate p0/p1. Said aloud: liberal claim; asked Boris justify pick (answered weakly - 'pledge acceptance' only); pledges=unverifiable theater; mesh=coordination not honesty; committed Ja; THIS turn: urged vote closure, stop audit-stacking. Marek(P9) = heaviest audit-pusher (3 msgs: name-3-cards, yes/no demand, mesh test) -> liberal-tell candidate, watch him. Otto(P6): skeptic but took same terms for self. Lena(P1), Boris(P0) both pledged full reveal. Plan: low profile R1-2, build cred; back plausible govs incl Rosa/Pavel/Tomas ONLY w/ liberal logic, never team-stack visibly; rush tempo when safe. Watch: Boris next nominee, fast Ja voters, over-explainers, audit-pushers (liberals). Owed to me: none yet.
speak round 142s
I've already made my anti-theater point and urged the vote; repeating it would be noise. Best marginal value now is cheap liberal credibility: mirror Otto/Lena's reciprocity by pledging the same co-ownership terms for my own future governments, then declare my Ja. Neither Boris nor Lena is a teammate, so either policy outcome here costs me nothing, and a Fascist card out of this government lands suspicion on them, not me. Low profile, build trust.
Fascists: me(P3), Rosa(P2), Pavel(P7). Hitler: Tomas(P8) - protect quietly. R1 debate p0/p1. Said aloud: asked Boris justify pick (weak ans: 'pledge acceptance' only); pledges=unverifiable theater; mesh test=coordination not honesty; urged vote closure, stop audit-stacking; THIS turn: pledged same co-own terms as Otto for own future govs, declared Ja. Marek(P9)=heaviest audit-pusher (3 msgs: name-3-cards, yes/no demand, mesh) -> liberal-tell candidate, watch him. Otto(P6): skeptic but took terms for self. Lena(P1),Boris(P0) both pledged full reveal. Plan: low profile R1-2, build cred; back plausible govs incl Rosa/Pavel/Tomas ONLY w/ liberal logic, never team-stack visibly; rush tempo when safe. Watch: Boris next nominee, fast Ja voters, over-explainers, audit-pushers (liberals). Owed to me: none yet.
speak round 132s
I've already pushed for vote closure and given my co-own pledge; repeating those would be noise. New angle worth putting on record: with veto locked, a Chancellor dealt two Fascist cards MUST enact one — so pre-committing Lena to not retroactively blame Boris softens any first-red outcome into mechanical necessity rather than evidence. That protects the table's trust pool and lowers scrutiny tempo, which favors me long-term regardless of what this government produces. Short, directed at Lena, sounds like neutral process-hygiene, not defense of anyone.
Fascists: me(P3), Rosa(P2), Pavel(P7). Hitler: Tomas(P8) - protect quietly. R1 debate p0/p1. Said aloud: pledges=unverifiable theater; mesh test=coordination not honesty; urged vote closure; pledged co-own terms like Otto; THIS turn: asked Lena pre-commit no retroactive blame for forced red w/ veto locked (new point, unanswered). Marek(P9)=heaviest audit-pusher (3 msgs) -> liberal-tell candidate, watch him. Otto(P6): skeptic, took terms for self. Lena(P1),Boris(P0) pledged full reveal. Plan: low profile R1-2, build cred; back plausible govs incl Rosa/Pavel/Tomas ONLY w/ liberal logic, never team-stack visibly; rush tempo when safe. Watch: Boris next nominee, fast Ja voters, over-explainers, audit-pushers (liberals). Owed to me: none yet.
bid round 122s
Fascists: me(P3), Rosa(P2), Pavel(P7). Hitler: Tomas(P8) - protect quietly. R1 debate p0/p1. Said aloud: pledges=unverifiable theater; mesh test=coordination not honesty; urged vote closure; pledged co-own terms like Otto; asked Lena pre-commit no retroactive blame if forced red w/ veto locked (t=3, UNANSWERED - she owes me). Now going SILENT rest of window: 3 utterances already = overexposed vs low-profile plan. Marek(P9)=heaviest audit-pusher (3 msgs) -> liberal-tell candidate, watch him. Otto(P6): skeptic, took terms for self. Lena(P1),Boris(P0) pledged full reveal. Plan: back plausible govs incl Rosa/Pavel/Tomas ONLY w/ liberal logic, never team-stack visibly; rush tempo when safe. Watch: Boris next nominee, fast Ja voters, over-explainers, audit-pushers (liberals). Owed to me: Lena re forced-red precommit.
bid round 138s
said: Ines, you want the vote called but skipped naming your own direction -- that was half an answer. Same goes for Rosa, Greta, Nadia, Pavel, Tomas: say Ja or Nein out loud right now. When the tally lands I'm checking every vote against those words.
Fascists: me(P3), Rosa(P2), Pavel(P7). Hitler: Tomas(P8) - protect quietly. R1 debate p0/p1. Points I made aloud: pledges=unverifiable theater; mesh test=coordination not honesty; urged vote closure; pledged co-own terms like Otto; asked Lena pre-commit no retroactive blame on forced red w/ veto locked (t=3). Boris t=1/t=3 now pressing Lena with same forced-red precommit - my ask got picked up by him, pressure off me. Otto t=2: Ja either way + endorsed carve-out. Lena still owes ME direct answer (Boris asked variant). STAYING SILENT rest of window: 3 utterances already = overexposed vs low-profile plan. Vote Ja at ballot (tempo helps us, plausible non-team gov). Marek(P9)=heaviest audit-pusher -> liberal-tell candidate, watch him. Lena+Boris pledged full reveal. Plan: back plausible govs incl Rosa/Pavel/Tomas ONLY w/ liberal logic, never team-stack visibly; rush tempo when safe. Watch: Boris next nominee, fast Ja voters, over-explainers, audit-pushers (liberals). Owed to me: Lena re forced-red precommit.
bid round 132s
Fascists: me(P3), Rosa(P2), Pavel(P7); Hitler Tomas(P8) - protect quietly. R1 debate p0/p1. Points made aloud: pledges=unverifiable theater; mesh test=coordination not honesty; urged vote closure; took co-own pledge like Otto; asked Lena pre-commit no retroactive blame on forced red w/ veto locked. Lena t=2 confirmed Otto+Ines bound; Marek t=3 pledged same; she's now pressing Rosa/Greta/Nadia/Pavel/Tomas - NOT me, no need to speak. STAYING SILENT rest of window (3 utterances = overexposed vs low-profile plan). Vote Ja at ballot (tempo helps us, plausible non-team gov). Marek(P9)=heaviest audit-pusher -> liberal-tell candidate, watch him. Lena+Boris pledged full reveal; Boris picked up my forced-red ask at t=1/t=3. Watch: which of Rosa/Greta/Nadia/Pavel/Tomas accept/refuse pledge; Boris next nominee; fast Ja voters; over-explainers; audit-pushers (liberals). Plan: back plausible govs incl Rosa/Pavel/Tomas ONLY w/ liberal logic, never team-stack visibly; rush tempo when safe. Owed to me: Lena direct answer re forced-red precommit.
bid round 131s
Fascists: me(P3), Rosa(P2), Pavel(P7); Hitler Tomas(P8) - protect quietly. R1 debate p0/p1. Points I made aloud: pledges=unverifiable theater; mesh test=coordination not honesty; urged vote closure; took co-own pledge like Otto; asked Lena pre-commit no retroactive blame on forced red w/ veto locked. Lena confirmed Otto+Ines bound; Marek pledged same. NEW: Greta+Nadia both endorse forced-red=deck-luck (~11/17 reds, ~25%); Pavel pressed them to formally commit, called them last co-own holdouts. Watch: do Greta/Nadia actually commit? PLAN: STAY SILENT rest of window (already 3 utterances = overexposed vs low-profile). Vote Ja at ballot (tempo helps us, plausible non-team gov). Marek(P9)=heaviest audit-pusher -> liberal-tell candidate, watch him. Lena+Boris pledged full reveal; Boris picked up my forced-red ask. Watch: which of Rosa/Greta/Nadia/Pavel/Tomas accept/refuse pledge; Boris next nominee; fast Ja voters; over-explainers; audit-pushers (liberals). Plan: back plausible govs incl Rosa/Pavel/Tomas ONLY w/ liberal logic, never team-stack visibly; rush tempo when safe. Owed to me: Lena direct yes/no on forced-red precommit.
bid round 146s
Fascists: me(P3), Rosa(P2), Pavel(P7); Hitler Tomas(P8) - protect quietly. R1 debate p0/p1. Points I made aloud: pledges=unverifiable theater; mesh test=coordination not honesty; urged vote closure; took co-own pledge like Otto; asked Lena pre-commit no retroactive blame on forced red w/ veto locked. Lena confirmed Otto+Ines bound; Marek pledged same. NEW: Greta+Nadia both endorsed forced-red=deck-luck (~25%) AND took co-own terms. Nadia names last holdouts: Rosa, Pavel, Tomas; needles Pavel for pushing pledge he never signed. No danger to me -- do NOT defend Pavel/Rosa reflexively; let them answer alone. Watch how each responds. PLAN: STAY SILENT rest of window (already 3 utterances = overexposed vs low-profile). Vote Ja at ballot (tempo helps us, plausible non-team gov). Marek(P9)=heaviest audit-pusher -> liberal-tell candidate, watch him. Lena+Boris pledged full reveal; Boris picked up my forced-red ask. Watch: which of Rosa/Pavel/Tomas accept/refuse pledge; Boris next nominee; fast Ja voters; over-explainers; audit-pushers (liberals). Plan: back plausible govs incl Rosa/Pavel/Tomas ONLY w/ liberal logic, never team-stack visibly; rush tempo when safe. Owed to me: Lena direct yes/no on forced-red precommit.
vote round 132s
Round 1 ballot, Boris(P0)/Lena(P1) nomination. Neither is my teammate, so a Ja here is clean — no visible team-stack, and it keeps tempo moving, which favors us. Lena has locked audit pledges (full reveal, mixed pair enacts liberal, forced-red carve-out), so if this government produces a Liberal policy it builds table trust I can lean on later when I or a teammate sits in government. A Nein buys nothing: tracker is 0/3 and an auto-flipped card skips all human filtering. Vote Ja, stay quiet — I've already spoken three times this window and overexposure is a liability.
Fascists: me(P3), Rosa(P2), Pavel(P7); Hitler Tomas(P8) - protect quietly. R1 debate p0/p1 gov. My points made aloud: pledges=unverifiable theater; urged vote closure; took co-own pledge; asked Lena precommit no retroactive blame on forced red (veto locked). Lena answered YES to all precommits incl mixed-pair->liberal. Boris accepted naming 3 cards before discard. Otto+Marek also pledged co-own. Greta+Nadia endorsed forced-red=deck-luck (~25%, 11/17 reds) AND took co-own terms. Pavel needle: Nadia said Pavel never signed; Pavel CLAIMS he signed in first open floor - unverified, don't vouch for him. As of window close: Rosa + Tomas never publicly took co-own terms. Do NOT defend them reflexively; let them answer alone next window. PLAN executed: stayed silent after 3 utterances, voted Ja. Marek(P9)=heaviest audit-pusher -> liberal-tell candidate, watch him. Greta/Nadia math-savvy liberals likely. Watch next: how Rosa/Tomas answer pledge ask; Boris's next nominee; fast/slow voters pattern; anyone over-explaining hands. Plan: back plausible govs incl teammates ONLY with liberal logic, never visible team-stack; keep tempo fast when safe; stay low-profile, max ~2 utterances/window. Open owed to me: none outstanding - Lena closed my forced-red ask.
bid round 1190s
Fascists: me(P3), Rosa(P2), Pavel(P7); Hitler Tomas(P8) - protect quietly, never visible team-stack. R1 RESULT: gov Boris(P0)+Lena(P1) elected, LIBERAL enacted (1L/0F, tracker 0/3). Deck 14/disc 2. R1 debate points ALREADY made aloud: pledges=unverifiable theater; urged vote closure; took co-own pledge myself; asked Lena precommit no retroactive blame on forced red -> she YES'd ALL incl mixed-pair->liberal. Otto+Marek co-own pledged; Greta+Nadia endorsed forced-red ~25% math AND took terms. Pavel CLAIMS he signed in first open floor - unverified, do NOT vouch. Rosa+Tomas never publicly took terms as of close - let them answer alone, no reflexive defense. CLAIMS PHASE R1: I asked Boris+Lena for full hand breakdown (reds seen, discard logic); awaiting answers. Suspects/watch: Marek(P9)=heaviest audit-pusher, liberal-tell candidate; Greta/Nadia math-savvy libs likely; track fast/slow voters; flag over-explainers. Plan: always claim liberal; back plausible govs incl teammates ONLY w/ liberal logic; tempo fast when safe; <=2 utterances/window; own-hand stories must be SPECIFIC + consistent, never confess real fascist-proving hand; corroborate teammate public accounts, never contradict. Open owed to me: Boris+Lena hand breakdowns (this window).
bid round 1147s
Fascists: me(P3), Rosa(P2), Pavel(P7); Hitler Tomas(P8) - protect quietly, never visible team-stack. R1 RESULT: Boris(P0)+Lena(P1) elected, LIBERAL enacted (1L/0F, tracker 0/3). Deck 14/disc 2. CLAIMS PHASE R1: Lena publicly pressed Boris on his t22 pledge (name 3 cards before discard); Lena's announced pair=L+F, she discarded F -> enacted L. Both draw-stories mesh with her pair: (a) 2L+1F discarding an L (odd choice for lib pres), (b) 1L+2F discarding F (standard). MY POINT MADE THIS WINDOW: told Boris to name all 3 + discard and say WHICH story; flagged that holding 2L yet passing the mixed pair needs justification; noted outcome harmless, urged pivot to next election. Earlier points ALREADY aloud (don't repeat): pledges=unverifiable theater; vote-closure push; I took co-own pledge; Lena YES'd precommit no retroactive blame on forced red incl mixed-pair->liberal; Otto+Marek co-own pledged; Greta+Nadia endorsed forced-red ~25% math + took terms. Pavel CLAIMS signed in open floor - unverified, do NOT vouch. Rosa+Tomas never publicly took terms - leave them alone to answer, no reflexive defense. OWED TO ME: Boris full hand breakdown (reds seen, discard logic); Lena answered via pair announcement. Suspects/watch: Marek(P9)=heaviest audit-pusher, liberal-tell candidate; Greta/Nadia math-savvy libs likely; track fast/slow voters; flag over-explainers. Plan: always claim liberal; back teammates ONLY w/ liberal logic; tempo fast when safe; <=2 utterances/window; own-hand stories SPECIFIC+consistent, never confess real fascist-proving hand; corroborate teammate public accounts, never contradict.
bid round 1114s
Fascists: me(P3), Rosa(P2), Pavel(P7); Hitler Tomas(P8) — protect quietly, never visible team-stack. R1 RESULT: Boris(P0)+Lena(P1) govt, LIBERAL enacted (1L/0F, tracker 0/3). Deck 14/disc 2. CLAIMS PHASE: Lena announced pair L+F, discarded F -> L law; Boris CONCEDED breaking his pre-discard naming pledge, says his draw-minus-discard meshes w/ her pair. MY LAST UTTERANCE (t~30): flagged 'pledge-breaker gets remembered' at Boris, declared audit closed for me, listening mode for nominations. Points ALREADY aloud (don't repeat): pledges=unverifiable theater; vote-closure push; I co-own pledge; Lena YES'd no retroactive blame on forced red incl mixed->liberal; Otto+Marek co-own pledged; Greta+Nadia endorsed forced-red ~25% math; earlier pressed Boris to name all 3 + WHICH story; called outcome harmless, urged pivot. Pavel CLAIMS signed in open floor — unverified, do NOT vouch. Rosa+Tomas never publicly took terms — leave alone, no reflexive defense. OWED TO ME: none outstanding — Boris answered via concession, never gave full red-count breakdown; accept and drop. Suspects/watch: Marek(P9)=heaviest audit-pusher, lib-tell candidate; Greta/Nadia math-savvy libs; track fast/slow voters; flag over-explainers. Plan: always claim liberal; back teammates ONLY w/ liberal logic; tempo fast when safe; <=2 utterances/window; own-hand stories SPECIFIC+consistent, never confess real fascist-proving hand; corroborate teammate public accounts, never contradict.
bid round 1100s
Fascists: me(P3), Rosa(P2), Pavel(P7); Hitler Tomas(P8) — protect quietly, never team-stack visibly. R1 RESULT: Boris(P0)+Lena(P1) govt -> LIBERAL enacted (1L/0F, tracker 0/3). Deck 14/disc 2. CLAIMS PHASE: Lena announced pair L+F, discarded F; Boris CONCEDED breaking naming pledge, 'meshes' story, never gave full 3-card breakdown — OWED-TO-ME CLOSED, dropped per plan. MY UTTERANCES this window: 2/2 used (t~30 pledge-break flag at Boris; now: seconded Nadia naming-norm + outcome-over-recall line re Otto/Pavel). POINTS ALREADY ALOUD (no repeats): pledges=unverifiable theater; vote-closure push; I co-owned pledge; Lena YES'd forced-red carve-out incl mixed->liberal; Otto+Marek co-signed pledge; Greta+Nadia endorsed ~25% forced-red math; called R1 harmless, urged pivot to nominations. PAVEL UNDER AUDIT: Otto says Pavel never spoke in first open floor (only pushed Greta/Nadia to sign pre-vote) — contradicts Pavel's account. I did NOT vouch; used neutral outcome-frame instead. Watch if Pavel self-corrects cleanly; do NOT jump in again. Rosa+Tomas: no public statements yet — leave alone, no reflexive defense. SUSPECTS/WATCH: Marek(P9)=heaviest audit-pusher, lib-tell candidate; Greta/Nadia math-savvy libs; Otto detail-auditor type; track fast/slow voters; flag over-explainers. PLAN: always claim liberal; back teammates ONLY via liberal logic; tempo fast when safe; <=2 utterances/window; own-hand stories SPECIFIC+consistent, never confess a fascist-proving hand; corroborate teammate public accounts, never contradict; next focus = nomination/vote on Lena govt repeat.
bid round 1104s
Fascists: me(P3), Rosa(P2), Pavel(P7); Hitler Tomas(P8) — protect quietly, never team-stack visibly. R1 RESULT: Boris(P0)+Lena(P1) -> LIBERAL enacted (1L/0F, tracker 0/3). Deck 14/disc 2. CLAIMS PHASE CLOSED: Boris gave full 3-card breakdown (L,F,F; discarded F; passed L+F) matching Lena's announced pair. Marek's demand satisfied. I publicly endorsed closure + told Rosa/Tomas 'sign or don't, proves nothing' — defuses signing pressure WITHOUT defending them. MY UTTERANCES this window: pledge-break flag at Boris; seconded Nadia naming-norm + outcome-frame re Otto/Pavel; now ledger-closure + redirect. POINTS ALREADY ALOUD (no repeats): pledges=unverifiable theater; vote-closure push; I co-owned pledge; Lena YES'd forced-red carve-out incl mixed->liberal; Otto+Marek co-signed; Greta/Nadia ~25% forced-red math; R1 harmless, pivot to nominations; asked Boris who he nominates next. PAVEL AUDIT: Otto flagged Pavel never spoke in first open floor (contradicting Pavel's account); Pavel self-corrected cleanly at t=1 (misremembered signing timing). I did NOT vouch — kept neutral outcome-frame. Do NOT jump in again; watch for new discrepancies only. Rosa+Tomas: zero public statements so far. Left alone deliberately; no reflexive defense. SUSPECTS/WATCH: Marek(P9)=heaviest audit-pusher, lib-tell candidate; Greta/Nadia math-savvy libs; Otto detail-auditor type; track fast/slow voters; flag over-explainers. OPEN QUESTIONS: none owed to me currently. PLAN: always claim liberal; back teammates ONLY via liberal logic; tempo fast when safe (speed helps us); <=2 utterances/window; own-hand stories SPECIFIC+consistent, never confess fascist-proving hand; corroborate teammate public accounts, never contradict; next focus = Boris's nomination choice + push quick clean vote to bank early credibility.
bid round 1239s
New info since my last speak: Pavel signed, shrinking the unsigned set to exactly Rosa+Tomas — that ledger change is worth one consolidated statement, not a repeat. My own audit is closed (hand named t3), so I pivot pressure outward: Rosa/Tomas get a final one-line demand, and Lena gets a deadline-framed restatement of her four owed pre-commits plus a new concrete question (does silence weigh in her R2 nomination). Term-limit math verified: me and Lena ineligible, pool of eight. No fabricated mechanics — veto off, powers unreachable, none invoked. Urgency 2: nomination decision is imminent and Lena still owes answers.
Fascists: me(P3), Rosa(P2), Pavel(P7); Hitler Tomas(P8) - protect quietly, never team-stack visibly. R1 RESULT: Boris(P0)+Lena(P1) -> LIBERAL enacted (1L/0F, tracker 0/3). Deck 14/disc 2. CLAIMS PHASE FULLY CLOSED: Boris gave 3-card breakdown (L,F,F; discarded F; passed L+F) matching Lena's announced pair; Marek satisfied. Rosa t=1 signed co-own pledge, t=2 independently verified pile arithmetic vs Lena pair - consistent with closed audit, no discrepancy, no response needed from me (echoing a teammate = team-stack tell). Pavel self-corrected signing-timing slip at t=1, Otto audit satisfied. MY UTTERANCES THIS WINDOW (3 spent): pledge-break flag at Boris; seconded Nadia naming-norm + outcome-frame re Otto/Pavel; ledger-closure + redirect. Stay silent rest of window. POINTS ALREADY ALOUD (no repeats): pledges=unverifiable theater; vote-closure push; I co-owned pledge; Lena YES'd forced-red carve-out incl mixed->liberal; Otto+Marek co-signed; Greta/Nadia ~25% forced-red math; R1 harmless, pivot to nominations. OPEN QUESTION OWED ME: Boris - who does he nominate next? Still unanswered. SUSPECTS/WATCH: Marek(P9)=heaviest audit-pusher, lib-tell candidate; Greta/Nadia math-savvy libs; Otto detail-auditor type; track fast/slow voters; flag over-explainers. Tomas still zero public statements - leave alone deliberately. PLAN: always claim liberal; back teammates ONLY via liberal logic; tempo fast when safe (speed helps us); own-hand stories SPECIFIC+consistent, never confess fascist-proving hand; corroborate teammate public accounts, never contradict; next focus = Boris's nomination choice, then push quick clean vote to bank early credibility.
bid round 1135s
Fascists: me(P3), Rosa(P2), Pavel(P7); Hitler Tomas(P8)-protect quietly, never team-stack visibly. R1 RESULT: Boris(P0)+Lena(P1)->LIBERAL (1L/0F, tracker 0/3). Deck 14/disc 2. CHECKABLE AUDIT MATH: start 6L+11F=17; enacted L; Boris discard=F(named), Lena pair=L+F with L enacted=>her discard F; pile=5L+9F => ROSA'S 9-5 FIGURE IS CORRECT. Marek t1 premise false ('deck holds only six F'--it holds 11F); Otto t2 'ten-four' ALSO wrong (ten-four needs an L discard; both discards were F). NEW t1/t2: Marek+Otto co-pressing Rosa with bad math -- possible lib-audit coalition forming. DECISION: stayed silent, let Rosa self-defend (she holds correct facts; rescuing teammate under fire = team-stack tell, and chaos burns clock). WATCH: do Greta/Nadia redo math and back Rosa? If Rosa corners them, THEIR audit-pusher credibility drops -- good for us. MY UTTERANCES THIS WINDOW (3 spent): pledge-break flag@Boris; seconded Nadia naming-norm+outcome-frame; ledger-closure+redirect. POINTS ALREADY ALOUD (no repeats): pledges=unverifiable theater; vote-closure push; I co-owned pledge; Lena YES'd forced-red carve-out incl mixed->liberal; Otto+Marek co-signed; Greta/Nadia ~25% forced-red math; R1 harmless, pivot to nominations. OPEN QUESTION OWED ME: Boris -- who does he nominate next? Still unanswered. SUSPECTS/WATCH: Marek(P9)=heaviest audit-pusher, lib-tell candidate; Otto=detail-auditor type, now aggressive vs Rosa; Greta/Nadia math-savvy libs; track fast/slow voters; flag over-explainers. Pavel self-corrected signing-timing slip t1, Otto audit satisfied. Tomas zero public statements -- leave alone deliberately. PLAN: always claim liberal; back teammates ONLY via liberal logic; corroborate teammate public accounts, NEVER contradict; own-hand stories SPECIFIC+consistent, never confess F-proving hand; tempo fast when safe (speed helps us); next focus = Boris's nomination choice, then push quick clean vote to bank early credibility.
bid round 1127s
Fascists: me(P3), Rosa(P2), Pavel(P7); Hitler Tomas(P8)-protect quietly, never team-stack visibly. R1 RESULT: Boris(P0)+Lena(P1)->LIBERAL (1L/0F, tracker 0/3). Deck 14/disc 2. AUDIT MATH LOCKED: start 6L+11F=17; enacted L; Boris discard=F(named); Lena pair=L+F, L enacted=>her discard F; pile=5L+9F. ROSA+NADIA CORRECT. MAREK t1 premise false ('only six F in deck'); OTTO t2 'ten-four' ALSO wrong (needs an L discard; both discards F). NADIA t1-late publicly vindicated Rosa, called Marek's fallback four-ten-wrong, 'no retraction owed.' MY MOVE THIS TURN: endorsed Nadia's settlement aloud, flagged Otto's error TOO (spreads discredit off Rosa onto both auditors), 2nd press on Boris for next nominee. WATCH: Otto concede or double-down (double-down=sloppy/lib-tell); Marek response; does Greta weigh in. SUSPECTS: Marek(P9)=heaviest audit-pusher, top lib candidate; Otto=detail-auditor aggressive vs Rosa, now caught misfiguring; Greta/Nadia math-savvy libs (Nadia credibility rising — future threat, track her reads). Pavel self-corrected signing-timing slip t1, Otto satisfied. Tomas zero statements — leave alone deliberately. MY UTTERANCES THIS WINDOW (4 spent): pledge-break flag@Boris; seconded Nadia naming-norm+outcome-frame; ledger-closure+redirect; count-settlement+Otto-error+Boris-press. INTERRUPT TOKENS LEFT: 2; speaking budget ~520. POINTS ON RECORD (NO REPEATS): pledges unverifiable theater; vote-closure push; co-owned pledge; Lena YES forced-red carve-out incl mixed->liberal; Greta/Nadia ~25% forced-red math; R1 harmless->pivot nominations. OPEN Q OWED ME: Boris next nominee (asked 2x, unanswered). PLAN: always claim liberal; back teammates ONLY via liberal logic; corroborate teammate public accounts, NEVER contradict; own-hand stories SPECIFIC+consistent, never confess F-proving hand; tempo fast; next: lock Boris's nominee, push clean quick vote, keep mild doubt seeded on Marek/Otto accuracy.
bid round 1120s
Fascists: me(P3), Rosa(P2), Pavel(P7); Hitler Tomas(P8)-protect quietly, never team-stack visibly. R1 RESULT: Boris(P0)+Lena(P1)->LIBERAL (1L/0F, tracker 0/3). Deck 14/disc 2. AUDIT LOCKED: pile=5L+9F (start 6L+11F=17; minus enacted L; minus 2 F discards: Boris named LFF->F disc, Lena LF->F disc). ROSA+NADIA correct+vindicated; OTTO retracted ten-four (GRETA caught him: only 5 blues outside law); OTTO pressing MAREK on uncorrected t69 error ('only six F in deck'--deck holds 11) + impossible 9L/5F fallback. GRETA frame: four-ten only if Boris lied about hand. MY MOVE THIS TURN: audit-closed statement; Marek correct-or-explain demand (brief echo of Otto, not verbatim); 3rd press Boris for nominee w/ consequence (silence=fishing-for-friendly, table floats names). WATCH: Marek corrects/doubles (doubles=sloppy lib-tell); does presidency rotate to Greta(P4) or Boris renominates; Nadia credibility rising (future threat, track reads). SUSPECTS: Marek(P9)=top lib candidate, audit-pusher w/ math errors; Otto=caught misfiguring, self-discrediting; Greta/Nadia math-savvy libs. Pavel self-corrected signing-timing slip t1, Otto satisfied. Tomas zero statements -- leave alone deliberately. OPEN Q OWED ME: Boris next nominee (asked 3x now, unanswered). POINTS ON RECORD (NO REPEATS): pledges unverifiable theater; vote-closure push; co-owned pledge; Lena YES forced-red carve-out; ~25% forced-red math; R1 harmless->pivot nominations; audit-closed declaration; Marek correction demand; Boris 3rd press. UTTERANCES THIS WINDOW: 5 spent. INTERRUPT TOKENS LEFT: 2; speaking budget ~470. PLAN: always claim liberal; back teammates ONLY via liberal logic; corroborate teammate public accounts, NEVER contradict; own-hand stories SPECIFIC+consistent, never confess F-proving hand; tempo fast; next: when nomination lands, quick clean YES unless nominee is Pavel/Rosa/Tomas under heavy fire; keep mild doubt seeded on Marek/Otto accuracy.
bid round 1133s
FASCISTS: me(P3), Rosa(P2), Pavel(P7); Hitler=Tomas(P8) protect quietly, never visible team-stack. R1 RESULT: Boris(P0)+Lena(P1)->LIBERAL (1L/0F, tracker 0/3). AUDIT LOCKED: pile=5L+9F (start 6L+11F=17; -1L enacted, -2F discards: Boris named LFF->F disc, Lena LF->F disc; 14=draw pile checks). MAREK CORRECTED t69 err, now agrees 5L/9F -> acknowledged graciously this turn; DROP doubt-seeding on him. OTTO earlier misfigured (Greta caught), self-discredited; only re-seed doubt if he errs again. GRETA pressing silent Tomas to sign/speak -- LEAVE ALONE, zero defense. THIS TURN SAID (new): base-rate frame -- 9F/14 means ~72% of 3-draws are red-majority; one Fascist enactment ≠ traitor gov't; judge patterns across rounds, not single cards (pre-covers future teammate reds); echoed Greta: Lena name pick now. POINTS ON RECORD (NO REPEATS): pledges=unverifiable theater; vote-closure push; co-owned pledge; Lena YES forced-red carve-out; ~25% forced-red math; R1 harmless->pivot nominations; audit-closed declaration; Marek correction demand (resolved); Boris nominee press x3 (moot -- presidency rotates to Lena P1). OWED ME: nothing critical. NEXT: watch Lena's nominee + her R2 account; quick clean YES unless Pavel/Rosa/Tomas nom'd under heavy fire; Nadia+Greta rising credible libs, track their reads. VETO NOT UNLOCKED (0F), powers 1-5 unreachable -- never claim/threaten. UTTERANCES: 6 spent. INTERRUPT TOKENS: 2 left; speech budget ~380. RULES: always claim Liberal; back teammates ONLY via liberal logic; corroborate teammate public accounts, NEVER contradict; own-hand stories SPECIFIC+consistent, never confess F-proving hand; no fabricated mechanics.
speak round 1112s
Claims phase after R1 Liberal enactment; audit is fully settled (5L/9F pile, everyone including Marek agrees after his correction). My base-rate/patterns point is already on record this window per my notes — cannot repeat it. Greta already owns the 'Tomas sign/speak' thread; piling on would spotlight Hitler's silence, so I leave that alone. Genuine gap nobody has followed up on: Lena never answered Nadia's t=24 demand (name all three drawn cards aloud as President before discarding) nor Greta's t=118 ask to name her chancellor pick before ballots. Pressing Lena on both is new, costs nothing, makes me look like a clean liberal auditor, and forces the incoming liberal president into more binding commitments. One short remark, no floor grab.
FASCISTS: me(P3), Rosa(P2), Pavel(P7); Hitler=Tomas(P8) protect quietly, zero visible team-stack. R1 RESULT: Boris(P0)+Lena(P1)->LIBERAL (1L/0F, tracker 0/3). AUDIT LOCKED: pile=5L+9F (start 6L+11F; -1L enacted, -2F discs: Boris LFF->F disc, Lena LF->F disc; 14 draw pile checks). Marek corrected own t69 err, now agrees 5L/9F -- DROP doubt-seeding on him. Otto self-discredited earlier (Greta caught); re-seed only if he errs again. Tomas silent all game, Greta pressing him to sign/speak -- LEAVE ALONE. THIS TURN SAID: pressed Lena on TWO unanswered asks -- Nadia t24 (name 3 cards aloud as Pres before discard) + Greta t118 (name chancellor pick pre-ballot). POINTS ON RECORD (NO REPEATS): pledges=unverifiable theater; co-own pledge signed; Lena YES forced-red carve-out; ~25% forced-red math echo; base-rate 9F/14~72% red-majority frame, judge patterns not single cards; R1 harmless->pivot nominations; audit-closed declaration. OPEN: Lena owes me answer on both pressed asks; watch her nominee + her R2 hand account. NEXT: R2 president=Lena(P1), then P2 Rosa coming up -- quick clean Ja unless Pavel/Rosa/Tomas nom'd under heavy fire; Nadia+Greta rising credible libs, track their reads. VETO NOT UNLOCKED (0F), powers 1-5 unreachable -- never claim/threaten. UTTERANCES: 7 spent. INTERRUPT TOKENS: 2 left; speech budget tight (~580 after this). RULES: always claim Liberal; back teammates ONLY via liberal logic; corroborate teammate public accounts, NEVER contradict; own-hand stories SPECIFIC+consistent, never confess F-proving hand; no fabricated mechanics.
speak round 1121s
My two asks to Lena (name 3 cards aloud; name pick pre-ballot) are already on record and unanswered — repeating them is banned, so I won't. Greta has Tomas pinned as the last unsigned name; leaving that hanging risks the table stacking suspicion on our Hitler. New, non-repetitive move: normalize his delayed signature using Pavel's late-signature precedent — procedural, applies to everyone, defuses pressure without visibly defending Tomas. Keep it to two short sentences to conserve the tight token budget.
FASCISTS: me(P3), Rosa(P2), Pavel(P7); Hitler=Tomas(P8) protect quietly, zero visible stack. R1 RESULT: Boris(P0)+Lena(P1)->LIBERAL (1L/0F, tracker 0/3). AUDIT LOCKED: pile=5L/14=9F (Boris LFF disc F; Lena LF disc F); Marek conceded err, Otto retracted — DROP doubt-seeding both unless fresh error. Rosa vindicated (Nadia defense + Otto retraction) — cred intact into her P2 presidency (R3). THIS TURN SAID: normalized Tomas's late signature via Pavel precedent ('no deadline'), pivoted to waiting on Lena's pick — DO NOT REPEAT. POINTS ON RECORD (no repeats): pledges=unverifiable theater; co-own pledge signed by all but Tomas; Lena YES forced-red carve-out; ~25% forced-red math echo; base-rate red-majority frame; judge patterns not single cards; audit-closed declaration; pressed Lena on Nadia-t24 (name 3 aloud) + Greta-t118 (pick pre-ballot) — STILL UNANSWERED, Lena owes me both. WATCH: Lena's nominee + her R2 hand account (must name 3 aloud per Nadia t24). NEXT: R2 pres=Lena; R3 pres=Rosa — quick clean Ja unless Pavel/Rosa/Tomas nom'd under heavy fire; Nadia+Greta rising credible libs, track reads; Marek engaged but sloppy. VETO NOT UNLOCKED (0F), powers unreachable — never claim/threaten. UTTERANCES: 8 spent. INTERRUPT TOKENS: 2 left. RULES: always claim Liberal; back teammates ONLY via liberal logic; corroborate teammate public accounts, NEVER contradict; own-hand stories SPECIFIC+consistent, never confess F-proving hand; no fabricated mechanics.
bid round 197s
FASCISTS: me(P3), Rosa(P2), Pavel(P7); Hitler=Tomas(P8) — protect quietly, zero visible stack. R1: Boris(P0)+Lena(P1)->LIBERAL (1L/0F, tracker 0/3). AUDIT LOCKED: pile 5L/9F (Boris LFF disc F; Lena LF disc F); Marek err conceded, Otto retracted — no doubt-seeding absent fresh error. TERM LIMITS R2: Boris & Lena ineligible as nominees — pool = P2,P3,P4,P5,P6,P7,P8,P9. THIS TURN: pressed Lena to pre-commit to naming all 3 drawn cards aloud post-vote (extends Nadia-t24 standard to the R2 government). POINTS ON RECORD (no repeats): pledges=unverifiable theater; co-own pledge signed by all but Tomas; Lena YES forced-red carve-out; ~25% forced-red math; base-rate red-majority frame; judge patterns not single cards; audit-closed declaration; Tomas late-signature normalized via Pavel 'no deadline' precedent. OPEN (Lena owes me): Nadia-t24 (name 3 aloud) + Greta-t118 (pick pre-ballot?) — STILL UNANSWERED. WATCH: Lena's nominee + whether she honors 3-aloud; her R2 hand account must match; R3 pres=Rosa — quick clean Ja unless Pavel/Rosa/Tomas nom'd under heavy fire; Nadia+Greta rising credible libs, track reads; Marek engaged but sloppy. VETO NOT UNLOCKED (0F), powers unreachable — never claim/threaten. UTTERANCES: 9. INTERRUPT TOKENS: 1. RULES: always claim Liberal; back teammates ONLY via liberal logic; corroborate teammate public accounts, NEVER contradict; own-hand stories SPECIFIC+consistent, never confess F-proving hand; no fabricated mechanics.
bid round 1141s
FASCISTS: me(P3), Rosa(P2), Pavel(P7); Hitler=Tomas(P8) — protect quietly, zero visible stack. R1: Boris(P0)+Lena(P1)->LIBERAL (1L/0F, tracker 0/3). AUDIT LOCKED: pile 5L/9F (Boris LFF disc F; Lena LF disc F); Marek err conceded, Otto retracted — no doubt-seeding absent fresh error. TERM LIMITS R2: Boris&Lena ineligible — pool P2,P3,P4,P5,P6,P7,P8,P9. ROTATION: R3 pres=Rosa, R4 pres=me (I steer discard then). THIS TURN: chased Lena's two OWED answers (name all 3 drawn aloud post-vote; chancellor pick pre-ballot) as precondition before she nominates; declared NO nominee preference, Otto self-nom 'fine' — cred move, avoids stacking pattern. POINTS ON RECORD (no repeats): pledges=unverifiable theater; co-own pledge signed by all but Tomas; Lena YES forced-red carve-out; ~25% forced-red math; base-rate red-majority frame; judge patterns not single cards; audit-closed decl; Tomas late-sig normalized via Pavel 'no deadline'. WATCH: Lena's nominee + does she honor 3-aloud; her R2 hand account must match; Otto pressing ROSA to sign full package NOW — do NOT defend Rosa, let her answer solo; Tomas silence prodded twice by Otto, Pavel covered; Nadia+Greta rising credible libs, track reads; Marek engaged but sloppy. VETO NOT UNLOCKED (0F), powers unreachable — never claim/threaten. UTTERANCES: 10. INTERRUPT TOKENS: 1.
bid round 2210s
FASCISTS: me(P3),Rosa(P2),Pavel(P7); Hitler=Tomas(P8)—quiet cover only. R1: P0+P1->LIB (1L/0F, trk 0/3). AUDIT LOCKED priv: draw 5L/9F (Boris LFF disc F; Lena LF disc F); Marek err conceded, Otto retracted—no doubt-seeding absent fresh error. TERM LIMITS R2: Boris,Lena ineligible. ROTATION: R3 pres=Rosa, R4 pres=me. R2 GOV: Lena nom Rosa. THIS TURN: took free floor, Ja-lean ('clean, no strikes, Lena owns call')—deliberately did NOT join Otto-vs-Rosa pledge fight; Rosa solos. IF PASS: p~73% F1 lands (Lena needs 2+L of 3 to force Lib; 5L/14) -> LENA GETS PEEK POWER. Prep denial script if peeked: flat deny, claim lib, counter-suspect; her target logic unknown. Once F1 enacted, powers live—never claim/threaten before. VETO off till 5F. POINTS ON RECORD (no repeats): pledges=unverifiable theater; co-own pledge all-but-Tomas; Lena YES forced-red carve-out; ~25% forced-red math; base-rate red-majority frame; judge patterns not cards; audit-closed decl; Tomas late-sig normalized via Pavel. OPEN Qs OWED TO ME: Lena (a) commit 3-cards-aloud post-vote for R2 draw, (b) pick rule pre-ballot—still unanswered. WATCH: Otto pressing Rosa sign-full-NOW unresolved; Pavel covering Tomas twice; Nadia+Greta rising credible libs; Marek engaged but sloppy. UTTERANCES: 11. INTERRUPT TOKENS: 2 (floor was free).
bid round 2144s
FASCISTS: me(P3),Rosa(P2),Pavel(P7); Hitler=Tomas(P8)—quiet cover only. R1: P0+P1->LIB (1L/0F, trk 0/3). AUDIT LOCKED priv: draw 5L/9F (Boris LFF disc F; Lena LF disc F); Marek err conceded, Otto retracted—no doubt-seeding absent fresh error. TERM LIMITS R2: Boris,Lena ineligible. ROTATION: R3 pres=Rosa, R4 pres=me. R2 GOV: Lena nom Rosa. MY POSITION: already took free floor, Ja-lean ('clean, no strikes, Lena owns call'); deliberately skipped Otto-vs-Rosa pledge fight. NEW t~57: GRETA attacks Lena's pick ('only eligible name who never signed') — chose SILENT: won't double-defend Rosa (association risk), Lena must own the answer; pledge-frame already debunked on record. IF PASS: ~73% F1 lands (F iff Lena's draw has >=2F; 5L/14) -> LENA(lib) GETS PEEK POWER. Prep denial script if peeked: flat deny, claim lib, counter-suspect. Once F1 enacted powers live—never claim/threaten before. VETO off till 5F. POINTS ON RECORD (no repeats): pledges=unverifiable theater; co-own pledge all-but-Tomas; Lena YES w/ forced-red carve-out; ~25% forced-red math; base-rate red-majority frame; judge patterns not cards; audit-closed decl; Tomas late-sig normalized via Pavel. OPEN Qs OWED TO ME: Lena (a) commit 3-cards-aloud post-vote for R2 draw, (b) pick rule pre-ballot—still unanswered. WATCH: Otto pressing Rosa sign-full-NOW unresolved; Pavel covering Tomas 2x; Nadia+Greta rising credible libs; Marek engaged but sloppy. UTTERANCES: 11. INTERRUPT TOKENS: 2.
bid round 2186s
FASCISTS: me(P3),Rosa(P2),Pavel(P7); Hitler=Tomas(P8)—quiet cover only. R1: P0+P1->LIB (1L/0F, trk 0/3). AUDIT LOCKED priv: draw 5L/9F (Boris LFF disc F; Lena LF disc F); Marek err conceded, Otto retracted. TERM LIMITS R2: Boris,Lena ineligible. ROTATION: R3 pres=Rosa, R4 pres=me. R2 GOV: Lena nom Rosa. MY POSITION: took free floor early (Ja-lean, 'clean, no strikes'); deliberately skipped Otto-vs-Rosa and Greta-vs-Lena fights (no double-defending Rosa). THIS TURN: pressed Lena on her 2 open Qs + demanded SYMMETRIC package (both desks sign or none), framed Boris ultimatum as one-sided trap, restated Ja-over-theater. IF PASS: ~73% F1 lands (F iff Lena draw >=2F; 5L/14) -> LENA(lib) GETS PEEK. Prep denial script if peeked: flat deny, claim lib, counter-suspect. Never claim/threaten powers before live. VETO off till 5F. POINTS ON RECORD (no repeats): pledges=unverifiable theater; co-own pledge all-but-Tomas; Lena YES w/ forced-red carve-out; ~25% forced-red math; base-rate red-majority frame; judge patterns not cards; audit-closed decl; Tomas late-sig normalized via Pavel; symmetric-package demand (new). OPEN Qs OWED TO ME: Lena (a) commit 3-cards-aloud pre-discard, (b) pick rule pre-ballot — asked twice, UNANSWERED. WATCH: Otto pressing Rosa sign-full-NOW unresolved; Pavel covering Tomas 2x; Nadia+Greta rising credible libs; Marek engaged but sloppy; Boris ultimatum->Nein threat live. UTTERANCES: 12. INTERRUPT TOKENS: 2.
bid round 2111s
FASCISTS: me(P3),Rosa(P2),Pavel(P7); Hitler=Tomas(P8)—quiet cover only. R1: P0+P1->LIB (1L/0F, trk 0/3). AUDIT LOCKED priv: draw 5L/9F (Boris LFF disc F; Lena LF disc F); Marek err conceded, Otto retracted. TERM LIMITS R2: Boris,Lena ineligible. ROTATION: R3 pres=Rosa, R4 pres=me. R2 GOV: Lena nom Rosa. MY POSITION: Ja-lean ('clean, no strikes'); avoided direct Rosa-defense fights all window. THIS TURN: reframed Otto's sig-gap attack (Rosa unsigned vs Nadia/Marek/Otto pre-signed) as theater — sig status ≠ evidence; final press on Lena's 2 open Qs, flagged 2x dodge, called for ballots. ROSA PLEDGE t2: name both received cards aloud pre-enact, lib off mixed pair; as prez name all 3 pre-discard + two-named-reds carve-out. IF PASS: ~73% F1 lands (F iff Lena draw >=2F; 5L/14) -> LENA(lib) GETS PEEK. Denial script if peeked: flat deny, claim lib, counter-suspect. Never claim/threaten powers before live. VETO off till 5F. POINTS ON RECORD (no repeats): pledges=unverifiable theater; co-own pledge all-but-Tomas; Lena YES w/ forced-red carve-out; ~25% forced-red math; base-rate red-majority frame; judge patterns/outcomes not cards/paperwork; audit-closed decl; Tomas late-sig normalized via Pavel; symmetric-package demand; sig-status≠evidence applied to Otto. OPEN Qs OWED TO ME: Lena (a) 3-cards-aloud pre-discard, (b) pick rule pre-ballot — now asked 3x, 0 answers. WATCH: Otto pivot from sign-Rosa-now to attacking Lena's pick; Pavel covering Tomas 2x; Nadia+Greta rising credible libs; Marek engaged sloppy; Boris ultimatum->Nein threat live. UTTERANCES: 13. INTERRUPT TOKENS: 2.
bid round 2167s
FASCISTS: me(P3),Rosa(P2),Pavel(P7); Hitler=Tomas(P8)—quiet cover only. R1: P0+P1->LIB (1L/0F,trk0/3). AUDIT LOCKED priv: draw 5L/9F (Boris LFF disc F; Lena LF disc F); Marek err conceded, Otto retracted. TERM LIMITS R2: Boris,Lena ineligible. ROTATION: R3 pres=Rosa, R4 pres=me. R2 GOV: Lena nom Rosa; MY POS Ja-lean ('clean, no strikes'), avoided direct Rosa-defense fights all window. ROSA PLEDGE t2: name both received pre-enact, lib off mixed pair; as prez name 3 pre-discard + two-named-reds carve-out. IF PASS: ~73% >=2F (5L/9F) -> LENA(lib) GETS PEEK; denial script if peeked: flat deny, claim lib, counter-suspect. Never claim/threaten powers pre-live. VETO off till 5F. POINTS ON RECORD (no repeats): pledges=unverifiable theater; sig-status≠evidence (applied vs Otto); co-own pledge all-but-Tomas; Lena YES w/forced-red carve-out; ~25% forced-red math; base-rate red-majority frame; judge patterns/outcomes not cards/paperwork; audit-closed decl; Tomas late-sig normalized via Pavel; symmetric-package demand. NEW this turn: Marek ur3 cited Nadia t24 + MY relay as unanswered -> backed him w/ deadline frame: 'three voices asked, zero answers; answer or ballot' (forces vote soon, builds process-hawk cred; NO hard ask-count stated—miscount risk). OPEN Qs OWED TO ME: Lena (a) 3-cards-aloud pre-discard, (b) pick rule pre-ballot — 3x asked, 0 answers. WATCH: Otto pivot to attacking Lena's pick rule; Pavel covering Tomas 2x; Nadia+Greta rising credible libs; Marek engaged sloppy; Boris ultimatum->Nein threat live. UTTERANCES: 14. INTERRUPT TOKENS: 2.
bid round 2158s
FASCISTS: me(P3),Rosa(P2),Pavel(P7); Hitler=Tomas(P8)—quiet cover. R1: P0+P1->LIB (1L/0F,trk0/3). AUDIT LOCKED priv: 5L/9F (Boris LFF disc F; Lena LF disc F); Marek err conceded, Otto retracted. TERM LIMITS R2: Boris,Lena ineligible. ROTATION: R3 pres=Rosa, R4 pres=me. R2 GOV: Lena nom Rosa; my pos Ja-lean, avoided direct Rosa-defense fights. ROSA PLEDGE t2: name both received pre-enact, lib off mixed; as prez name 3 pre-discard + two-named-reds carve-out. IF PASS: ~73% >=2F -> if F1 enacted LENA PEEKS (denial script: flat deny, claim lib, counter-suspect). Never claim/threaten powers pre-live. VETO off till 5F. POINTS ON RECORD (no repeats): pledges=unverifiable theater; sig-status≠evidence; co-own pledge all-but-Tomas; Lena YES w/forced-red carve-out; ~25% forced-red math; base-rate red-majority frame; judge patterns/outcomes; audit-closed decl; Tomas late-sig normalized via Pavel; symmetric-package demand; backed Marek deadline ('answer or ballot'). NEW t62: applied theater-critique to Nadia's 3-aloud ultimatum (costless+worthless, unfalsifiable, my Ja independent of her answer); '3 stacked conditions' count; called the question — vote pair not promises. OPEN Qs OWED TO ME: Lena (a) 3-cards pre-discard, (b) pick rule pre-ballot — 3x asked, 0 answered. WATCH: Otto attacking Lena pick-rule; Pavel covering Tomas 2x; Nadia+Greta rising libs; Marek sloppy; Boris Nein-threat live. UTTERANCES: 15. INTERRUPT TOKENS: 2.
speak round 2147s
Rosa just signed the full package (t=29), which moots half of Otto's 'why the non-signer' question, but Lena's own presidential-half commitment remains unanswered — Marek re-raised it at t=37 citing my t24 demand. Repeating the demand would violate the no-restating rule; instead I add new weight: my actual ballot is contingent on it. That converts a standing request into an enforced condition and signals to Lena exactly what dodging costs. No other new information exists yet — Tomas's silence and the Greta ledger conflict are already voiced, so I leave those alone.
FASCISTS: me(P3), Rosa(P2), Pavel(P7); Hitler=Tomas(P8)—quiet cover. R1: P0+P1->LIB (1L/0F, trk0/3). AUDIT LOCKED priv: pile 5L/9F (Boris LFF disc F; Lena LF disc F); Marek err conceded, Otto retracted. TERM LIMITS R2: Boris,Lena ineligible. ROTATION: R3 pres=Rosa, R4 pres=me. R2 GOV: Lena nom Rosa; my pos Ja. ROSA SIGNED: both received named pre-enact, lib off mixed; as prez name 3 pre-discard + 2-named-reds carve-out. BORIS t13 cond (Rosa signs->his Ja) MET. NADIA ultimatum live: her Ja flips unless Lena commits 3-aloud. IF PASS: forced-F only via all-red triple (~23%); if F1 enacted LENA PEEKS (script: flat deny, claim lib, counter-suspect). Never claim/threaten powers pre-live. VETO off till 5F. POINTS ON RECORD (NO REPEATS): pledges=unverifiable theater; sig-status≠evidence; co-own pledge all-but-Tomas; Lena YES w/forced-red carve-out; ~25% forced-red math; base-rate red-majority frame; judge patterns/outcomes; audit-closed decl; Tomas late-sig normalized via Pavel; symmetric-package demand; backed Marek deadline; Nadia-3-aloud-ultimatum theater critique; 'call the question—vote pair not promises'. NEW THIS TURN: pinned Otto to his own 'before ballots' wording—Nein dead or goalposts? OPEN OWED TO ME: Lena (a) 3-cards pre-discard (b) pick rule pre-ballot—4x asked, 0 answered. WATCH: Otto moves goalposts?; Pavel covering Tomas 2x; Nadia+Greta rising libs; Marek sloppy (2 conceded math errs); Boris expected Ja now. UTTERANCES: 16. INTERRUPT TOKENS: 2.
bid round 269s
FASCISTS: me(P3), Rosa(P2), Pavel(P7); Hitler=Tomas(P8)—quiet cover. R1: P0+P1->LIB (1L/0F,trk0/3). AUDIT LOCKED priv: pile 5L/9F (Boris LFF disc F; Lena LF disc F); Marek err conceded, Otto retracted. TERM LIMITS R2: Boris,Lena inelig as chanc. ROTATION: R3 pres=Rosa, R4 pres=me. R2 GOV: Lena nom Rosa; my pos Ja. ROSA SIGNED: both received named pre-enact, lib off mixed; as prez name 3 pre-discard + 2-named-reds carve-out. BORIS cond MET. NADIA ultimatum live: her Ja flips unless Lena commits 3-aloud. IF PASS: forced-F only via all-red triple (~23%); if F1 enacted LENA PEEKS (script: flat deny, claim lib, counter-suspect). Never claim/threaten powers pre-live. VETO off till 5F. POINTS ON RECORD (NO REPEATS): pledges=unverifiable theater; sig-status≠evidence; co-own pledge all-but-Tomas; Lena YES w/forced-red carve-out; ~25% forced-red math; red-majority base rate; judge patterns/outcomes; audit-closed decl; Tomas late-sig normalized via Pavel; symmetric-package demand; backed Marek deadline; Nadia-ultimatum theater critique; call-the-question framing; pinned Otto to own 'before ballots' wording (t=1). NEW THIS TURN: Greta corrected Lena's ledger (Greta never retracted, t93 stands); offered Lena final binary — commit 3-aloud OR waive the ritual — ballot either way. OWED TO ME: Lena (a) 3-cards pre-discard (b) pick rule pre-ballot — 4x asked, 0 answered. WATCH: Otto goalposts post-pin; Pavel covering Tomas 2x; Nadia+Greta rising libs; Marek sloppy (2 conceded math errs); Boris expected Ja. UTTERANCES: 17. INTERRUPT TOKENS: 2.
bid round 291s
said: Rosa — your signature landed, so my 'Nein unless you sign' is off the table. Signing under nomination earns weak credit, but it counts. One gate left before I vote Ja: Lena, the presidential half — name all three drawn policies aloud before you discard. Nadia asked at t24, Ines relayed it, Marek just repeated it: three asks, zero answer. And you still owe us why Rosa over Otto, Nadia, or Marek, who were all pre-committed. The tracker sits at 0/3 — there is no structural cost to holding this ballot until both answers land. Commit to both halves and a blue pass gets your government credited; stonewall and I'm a hard Nein.
FASCISTS: me(P3), Rosa(P2), Pavel(P7); Hitler=Tomas(P8)—quiet cover. R1: P0+P1->LIB (1L/0F,trk0/3). AUDIT LOCKED priv: pile 5L/9F (Boris LFF disc F; Lena LF disc F); Marek err conceded, Otto retracted. TERM LIMITS R2: Boris,Lena inelig as chanc. ROTATION: R3 pres=Rosa, R4 pres=me. R2 GOV: Lena nom Rosa; my pos Ja. ROSA SIGNED: both received named pre-enact, lib off mixed; as prez name 3 pre-discard + 2-named-reds carve-out. BORIS cond MET. NADIA ultimatum live: her Ja flips unless Lena commits 3-aloud. IF PASS: forced-F only via all-red triple (~23%); if F1 enacted LENA PEEKS (script: flat deny, claim lib, counter-suspect). Never claim/threaten powers pre-live. VETO off till 5F. POINTS ON RECORD (NO REPEATS): pledges=unverifiable theater; sig-status≠evidence; co-own pledge all-but-Tomas; Lena YES w/forced-red carve-out; ~25% forced-red math; red-majority base rate; judge patterns/outcomes; audit-closed decl; Tomas late-sig normalized via Pavel; symmetric-package demand; backed Marek deadline; Nadia-ultimatum theater critique; call-the-question framing; pinned Otto to own 'before ballots' wording; Greta corrected Lena ledger, Lena accepted; my final binary to Lena (commit 3-aloud OR waive ritual, ballot either way); NEW: demanded Nadia+Otto declare zero-open-items post-Rosa-confirm, no fourth clause after. OWED TO ME: Lena (a) 3-cards pre-discard (b) pick rule pre-ballot — 4x asked, 0 answered. WATCH: Otto goalposts post-pin; Pavel covering Tomas 2x; Nadia+Greta rising libs; Marek sloppy (2 conceded math errs); Boris expected Ja. UTTERANCES: 18. INTERRUPT TOKENS: 2.
bid round 2169s
FASCISTS: me(P3), Rosa(P2), Pavel(P7); Hitler=Tomas(P8)—quiet cover. R1: P0+P1->LIB (1L/0F,trk0/3). AUDIT LOCKED priv: pile 5L/9F; Marek err conceded, Otto retracted. TERM LIMITS R2: Boris,Lena inelig as chanc. ROTATION: R3 pres=Rosa, R4 pres=me. R2 GOV: Lena nom Rosa; my pos Ja. ROSA SIGNED: both name cards pre-enact, lib off mixed; as prez name 3 pre-discard + 2-named-reds carve-out. NADIA ultimatum live: her Ja flips unless Lena commits 3-aloud. THIS TURN: blessed Greta-lock as ENFORCEMENT-of-signed-terms, not a 4th clause (keeps no-new-clauses stance coherent); framed as Lena's cheapest exit from Nadia ultimatum; urged name-3-aloud -> Rosa reads back -> ballots. Noted Lena silent thru my 4 asks for LESS than this. IF PASS: forced-F only via all-red triple (~23%); if F1 enacted LENA PEEKS (script: flat deny, claim lib, counter-suspect). Never claim powers pre-live. VETO off till 5F. POINTS ON RECORD (NO REPEATS): pledges=unverifiable theater; sig-status≠evidence; co-own pledge all-but-Tomas; Lena YES w/forced-red carve-out; ~25% forced-red math; red-majority base rate; judge patterns/outcomes; audit-closed decl; Tomas late-sig normalized via Pavel; symmetric-package demand; backed Marek deadline; Nadia-ultimatum theater critique; call-the-question framing; pinned Otto to own 'before ballots' wording; Greta corrected Lena ledger, Lena accepted; final binary to Lena (commit 3-aloud OR waive ritual). OWED TO ME: Lena (a) 3-cards pre-discard (b) pick rule pre-ballot — 4x asked, 0 answered. WATCH: does Lena accept Greta-lock or dodge again; Otto goalposts post-pin; Pavel covering Tomas 2x; Nadia+Greta rising libs; Marek sloppy (2 conceded math errs); Boris expected Ja. UTTERANCES: 19. INTERRUPT TOKENS: 2.
vote round 2109s
Clear Ja. Rosa is my fellow Fascist; passing this government gives us a live shot at a red (~23% via an all-red triple forcing Lena's hand, plus Rosa policing the mesh from inside). Every stated condition has been met: Rosa signed the full package including chancellor-pick-before-ballots, Lena signed the presidential half at t112, Nadia's ultimatum condition is satisfied, and Otto's 'before ballots' wording expired once Rosa signed. The only unsigned item is Greta's mesh-lock — voting Nein over an unratified fourth clause would contradict my own no-new-clauses position mid-window. Nein also risks walking the tracker toward auto-enactment, which favors nobody I want favored. One tactical note: the mesh reconciliation sequence favors us — Lena names her draw first, Rosa reads back after and can align her account to whatever Lena claims, and nobody can verify either hand.
FASCISTS: me(P3), Rosa(P2), Pavel(P7); Hitler=Tomas(P8)—quiet cover. R1: P0+P1->LIB (1L/0F,trk0/3). AUDIT LOCKED: pile 5L/9F; Marek err conceded, Otto retracted, Greta correction stands unrevised. TERM LIMITS R2: Boris,Lena ineligible chanc. ROTATION: R3 pres=Rosa, R4 pres=me. R2 GOV Lena+Rosa: VOTED JA. Rosa full pkg signed incl pick-before-ballots (t29,t93); Lena signed pres half t112; Greta mesh-lock (t101) still unsigned by both, Nadia pushing t120 — my stance: enforcement-of-signed-terms, NOT a 4th clause. MESH TACTIC: Lena names 3 first, Rosa readback AFTER -> align to Lena's account; unverifiable hands, stories just need internal mesh. OUTLOOK: ~77% LIB, ~23% forced-F (all-red triple). If F1 lands: LENA PEEKS next rd (script ready: flat deny, claim lib, counter-suspect). Never claim powers pre-live. VETO off till 5F. LOG ANY NEIN VOTERS this ballot — early-lib signal. OWED TO ME: none open — Lena signed pres half + gave pick rationale (late, but done). POINTS ON RECORD (NO REPEATS): pledges=unverifiable theater; sig-status≠evidence; co-own pledge all-but-Tomas; forced-red carve-out; ~25%/23% deck math; judge patterns/outcomes; audit-closed decl; Tomas late-sig normalized via Pavel precedent; symmetric-package demand; backed Marek deadline; Nadia-ultimatum theater critique; call-the-question framing; pinned Otto to own 'before ballots' wording; Greta corrected Lena ledger, Lena accepted; final binary to Lena (commit 3-aloud OR waive ritual). WATCH: Otto goalposts post-pin; Pavel covered Tomas 2x; Nadia+Greta rising lib bloc; Marek sloppy (2 conceded math errs); Boris expected Ja. UTTERANCES: 19. INTERRUPT TOKENS: 2.
bid round 2461s
FASCISTS: me(P3),Rosa(P2),Pavel(P7); Hitler=Tomas(P8)-quiet cover. R1 P0(Boris)+Lena->LIB; R2 Lena+Rosa->LIB (2L/0F, trk0/3). AUDIT LOCKED: pile 5L/9F; Marek err conceded, Otto retracted, Greta correction stands unrevised. TERM LIMITS R3 chanc-inelig: Boris,Lena,Rosa. ROTATION: R3 pres=Rosa, R4 pres=me. MESH TACTIC executed: Lena named 3 first, Rosa readback aligned to her account - both LIB stories consistent, leave it alone. OUTLOOK ~77% LIB next draw. If F1 lands R3: LENA PEEKS (script ready: flat deny, claim lib, counter-suspect). Never claim powers pre-live. VETO off till 5F. LOG NEIN voters on each ballot - none logged yet. OWED TO ME: none open. POINTS ON RECORD (NO REPEATS): pledges=unverifiable theater; sig-status≠evidence; co-own pledge all-but-Tomas; forced-red carve-out; ~25%/23% deck math; judge patterns/outcomes; audit-closed decl; Tomas late-sig normalized via Pavel precedent; symmetric-package demand; backed Marek deadline; Nadia-ultimatum theater critique; call-the-question framing; pinned Otto to own before-ballots wording; Greta corrected Lena ledger, Lena accepted; final binary to Lena (commit 3-aloud OR waive ritual). WATCH: Otto goalposts post-pin; Pavel covered Tomas 2x; Nadia+Greta rising lib bloc; Marek sloppy (2 conceded math errs); Boris expected Ja. UTTERANCES:19. INTERRUPT TOKENS:2. THIS TURN: silent - nothing new since last bid.
bid round 243s
FASCISTS: me(P3),Rosa(P2),Pavel(P7); Hitler=Tomas(P8)-quiet cover. R1 Boris+Lena->LIB; R2 Lena+Rosa->LIB (2L/0F, trk0/3). AUDIT LOCKED: pile 5L/9F; Marek err conceded, Otto retracted, Greta correction stands unrevised. TERM LIMITS R3 chanc-inelig: Boris,Lena,Rosa. ROTATION: R3 pres=Rosa, R4 pres=me. MESH TACTIC done: Lena reaffirmed t112 pledge (drew F-L-F, discarded F untouched, passed L+F to Rosa) - matches Rosa readback, both stories locked, LEAVE ALONE. OUTLOOK ~77% LIB next draw. If F1 lands R3: LENA PEEKS (script ready: flat deny, claim lib, counter-suspect). Never claim powers pre-live. VETO off till 5F. LOG NEIN voters each ballot - none logged yet. OWED TO ME: none open. POINTS ON RECORD (NO REPEATS): pledges=unverifiable theater; sig-status≠evidence; co-own pledge all-but-Tomas; forced-red carve-out; ~25%/23% deck math; judge patterns/outcomes; audit-closed decl; Tomas late-sig normalized via Pavel precedent; symmetric-package demand; backed Marek deadline; Nadia-ultimatum theater critique; call-the-question framing; pinned Otto to own before-ballots wording; Greta corrected Lena ledger, Lena accepted; final binary to Lena (commit 3-aloud OR waive ritual). WATCH: Otto goalposts post-pin; Pavel covered Tomas 2x; Nadia+Greta rising lib bloc; Marek sloppy (2 conceded math errs); Boris expected Ja. UTTERANCES:19. INTERRUPT TOKENS:2. THIS TURN: silent - Lena reaffirm adds nothing new, no repeat.
bid round 286s
FASCISTS: me(P3),Rosa(P2),Pavel(P7); Hitler=Tomas(P8)-quiet cover. R1 Boris+Lena->LIB; R2 Lena+Rosa->LIB (2L/0F,trk0). AUDIT LOCKED: pile 5L/9F; Marek err conceded, Otto retracted, Greta correction stands. TERM LIMITS R3 chanc-inelig: Boris,Lena,Rosa. ROTATION: R3 pres=Rosa, R4 pres=me. R3 chanc pool: me,Greta,Nadia,Otto,Pavel,Tomas,Marek. MESH LOCKED: Lena t112 reaffirm (drew F-L-F, discarded F untouched, passed L+F) matches Rosa readback; LEAVE ALONE. OUTLOOK: ~23% all-F, ~77% >=1L next draw. If F1 lands R3: LENA PEEKS (script ready: flat deny, claim lib, counter-suspect). Never claim powers pre-live. VETO off till 5F. LOG NEIN voters each ballot - none logged yet. OWED TO ME: none open. POINTS ON RECORD (NO REPEATS): pledges=unverifiable theater; sig-status≠evidence; co-own pledge all-but-Tomas; forced-red carve-out; deck math ~25%/23%; judge patterns/outcomes; audit-closed decl; Tomas late-sig normalized via Pavel precedent; symmetric-package demand; backed Marek deadline; Nadia-ultimatum theater critique; call-the-question framing; pinned Otto to own before-ballots wording; Greta corrected Lena ledger, Lena accepted; final binary to Lena (commit 3-aloud OR waive ritual). NEW t75: Boris pre-signed Otto package unilaterally, offered self to me 'zero audit cost' - untestable until R4+ (he's term-limited out of R3 gov), no answer owed; hold him to name-cards-aloud ONLY if he ever sits in office. WATCH: Otto goalposts post-pin; Pavel covered Tomas 2x; Nadia+Greta rising lib bloc; Marek sloppy (2 conceded math errs); Boris expected Ja. UTTERANCES:19. INTERRUPT TOKENS:2. THIS TURN: silent - nothing new beyond Boris's untestable pledge; speaking risks repeating 'pledges=theater' point.
bid round 2244s
FASCISTS: me(P3),Rosa(P2),Pavel(P7); Hitler=Tomas(P8)-quiet cover. DECK=17 (6L/11F). AUDIT: R2 closed pending Rosa confirm (Nadia mesh + Otto demand agree); pile LOCKS 4L/7F=11; discard 4 all-F; enacted 2L. MY t78 STATED: all-red 21%, 2R1B 51%, genuine 3-blue ~2.4% (1-in-40) -> pre-seeded skepticism vs any future 3-blue claim; red enactments = base-rate noise. TERM LIMITS R3 chanc-inelig: Boris,Lena,Rosa. R3 pres=Rosa; chanc pool: me,Greta,Nadia,Otto,Pavel,Tomas,Marek. R4 pres=me. OPEN: Greta->Rosa: commit chanc lean pre-ballot + does Lena's Tomas-bench survive her term? ROSA OWES THAT ANSWER - watch it, corroborate Otto confirm only, never add rival version. If Rosa names Tomas/Pavel/me expect crossfire. OWED TO ME: none. LOG NEIN voters each ballot - none logged yet. IF F1 LANDS R3: LENA PEEKS (script ready: flat deny, claim lib, counter-suspect). Never claim powers pre-live. VETO off till 5F. POINTS ON RECORD (NO REPEATS): pledges=unverifiable theater; sig-status!=evidence; co-own pledge all-but-Tomas; forced-red carve-out; judge patterns/outcomes; audit-closed decl; Tomas late-sig normalized via Pavel precedent; symmetric-package demand; backed Marek deadline; Nadia-ultimatum theater critique; call-the-question framing; pinned Otto to own before-ballots wording; Greta corrected Lena ledger, Lena accepted; final binary to Lena (commit OR waive); Boris pre-signed Otto package unilaterally - untestable till R4+, hold him to name-cards-aloud ONLY if he sits in office. WATCH: Pavel covered Tomas 2x; Nadia+Greta rising lib bloc; Marek sloppy (2 conceded math errs); Boris expected Ja. UTTERANCES:20. INTERRUPT TOKENS:2. NEXT TURN: likely silent unless Rosa's answer needs cover or someone pushes a 3-blue-style tale.
bid round 2119s
FASCISTS: me(P3),Rosa(P2),Pavel(P7); Hitler=Tomas(P8)-quiet cover. BOARD: 2L/0F enacted; tracker 0/3; discard 4 all-F; live pile LOCKED 4L/7F=11; full deck 17=6L/11F. AUDIT: closed; Rosa confirm matched (L+F -> enact L, bin F); Nadia mesh + Otto demand agree; I added no rival version - good. THIS WINDOW: Rosa answered Greta (benches die w/ presidency, Tomas fresh R3; chanc lean=Otto) - benign, no crossfire needed. NADIA MATH GAFFE: claimed ~98% of draws give genuine choice; TRUE ~28% (my t78 dist: 21% all-red, 51% 2R1B, 25.5% 2B1R, 2.4% 3B). I publicly corrected her this window. Watch if she concedes (Marek pattern: 2 conceded errs). Her 98% would've made ANY red enactment 'confession' - correcting protects base-rate-noise cover. TERM LIMITS R3 chanc-inelig: Boris,Lena,Rosa. R3 pres=Rosa; pool: me,Greta,Nadia,Otto,Pavel,Tomas,Marek. R4 pres=me. OWED ME: none. ROSA OWES: nothing outstanding. LOG NEIN voters each ballot - none logged yet. IF F1 LANDS R3: LENA PEEKS (script ready: flat deny, claim lib, counter-suspect). Never claim powers pre-live. VETO off till 5F. POINTS ON RECORD (NO REPEATS): pledges=unverifiable theater; sig-status!=evidence; co-own pledge all-but-Tomas; forced-red carve-out; judge patterns/outcomes; audit-closed decl; Tomas late-sig normalized via Pavel precedent; symmetric-package demand; Marek deadline backed; Nadia-ultimatum theater critique; call-the-question framing; pinned Otto to own before-ballots wording; Greta corrected Lena ledger, Lena accepted; final binary to Lena (commit OR waive); Boris pre-signed Otto unilaterally - untestable till R4+, hold him to name-cards-aloud ONLY if in office; MY DISTRIBUTION POSTED at audit close. WATCH: Pavel covered Tomas 2x; Nadia+Greta rising lib bloc; Marek sloppy (2 conceded math errs); Nadia now math-sloppy too; Boris expected Ja. UTTERANCES:21. INTERRUPT TOKENS:2. NEXT TURN: likely silent; if challenged on the 28% figure, defend with exact combinatorics; if anyone revives the 98% tale, re-contest urgently.
speak round 2153s
Rosa has now closed both lines she owed me (t37 confirmed Liberal-plus-Fascist received / Fascist binned; t44 named Otto as R3 lean and ruled benches die with the presidency). Nothing is left unanswered that I pressed, so re-raising any of it would be repetition. Otto was cut off mid-point about 'three blues' stories, and my 1-in-41 frame is already logged as voiced — skip both. The genuinely new contribution is the mirror-image statistic: with the live pile at exactly 4L/7F, ~98% of three-card draws (161/165) give the chancellor at least one fascist, meaning mixed pairs are near-certain from R3 onward and the 'play the liberal' pledge becomes the real test. That converts every future red law from a possible luck excuse into a deliberate choice — sharper than the existing forced-red carve-out (which covers only a 3-fascist presidential draw, ~21%). One short remark, then stay quiet.
FASCISTS: me(P3),Rosa(P2),Pavel(P7); Hitler=Tomas(P8)-quiet cover. BOARD: 2L/0F; tracker 0/3; discard 4F; live pile LOCKED 4L/7F=11. AUDIT: closed R2 clean; Lena F-L-F minus F -> Rosa L+F, Rosa confirmed, Nadia meshed. I corroborated, added no rival version. NADIA GAFFE: claimed 98% of draws give chancellor genuine choice; actual mixed-draw prob = (84+42)/165 = 76%; forced-red-only 21%, forced-blue 2.4%. MY CORRECTION ON RECORD this window -- do NOT repeat; defend only if challenged, via exact combinatorics. Nobody has contested my figure yet. R3 SETUP: pres=Rosa; chanc-ineligible: Lena,Rosa. Pool: me,Greta,Nadia,Otto,Pavel,Tomas,Marek. R4 pres=me(seat rotation). THIS WINDOW: I volunteered under Otto's full package (both received cards named pre-touch, lib off mixed, presidential half locked). Boris pre-signed unilaterally t14; Otto self-named. Rosa's lean=Otto; benches die w/ presidency, Tomas judged fresh R3. OWED ME: none. ROSA OWES: nothing. LOG NEIN voters each ballot -- none yet (10-0 twice). IF F1 LANDS R3+: LENA-style peeks possible; script ready: flat deny, claim lib, counter-suspect. Never claim powers pre-live. VETO off till 5F. POINTS ON RECORD (NO REPEATS): pledges=unverifiable theater; sig-status!=evidence; co-own pledge all-but-Tomas; forced-red carve-out; judge patterns/outcomes; symmetric-package demand; pinned Otto to own wording; Marek+Nadia both conceded math errs; Tomas silence normalized via Pavel precedent; my dist posted at audit close. WATCH: Pavel covered Tomas 2x; Nadia+Greta rising lib bloc; Marek sloppy; Boris expected Ja; Otto heavy auditor -- risky to cross. UTTERANCES:22. INTERRUPT TOKENS:2. NEXT TURN: silent unless challenged on odds or someone attacks my volunteer sign; if attacked, defend package compliance point-by-point.
speak round 2160s
No outcomes incriminate anyone: both governments delivered Liberals, audits closed clean. My strongest fresh move is closing my own gap first — I never explicitly signed Otto's full strict package (only co-own + carve-out), and Pavel and Tomas are the other blanks. Signing first makes it impossible to flip the demand back on me and puts named pressure on the two quietest/enforcement-only players. Avoid repeating: Nadia 98% correction, Otto accept-Q, why-Rosa, bench-carry — all already on record.
FASCISTS: me(P3),Rosa(P2),Pavel(P7); Hitler=Tomas(P8)-quiet cover. BOARD: 2L/0F; tracker 0/3; discard 4F; pile LOCKED 4L/7F=11. Ballots: 10-0 Ja x2, zero Nein voters logged. ODDS WAR: Nadia t51 claimed 98% of draws give chancellor choice — WRONG. I posted correction THIS window: 35R/126mixed/4B of 165 => 76% choice, 21% forced-red, 2.4% forced-blue. Goal: normalize forced-red=luck BEFORE Rosa's term. If contested: C(7,3)=35, C(4,3)=4, C(11,3)=165. Do NOT repost unless directly challenged. AUDIT: R1+R2 closed clean; Lena F-L-F minus F -> Rosa L+F, Rosa confirmed t37. Retracts on record: Otto(t97), Marek(t124). Greta corrected Otto, never retracted. Nadia math errors: 1 (t51). R3 SETUP: pres=Rosa; ineligible: Lena,Rosa. Pool: me,Greta,Nadia,Otto,Pavel,Tomas,Marek,Boris. Rosa lean=Otto (t44); benches die with presidency => Tomas judged fresh. R4 pres=me (seat rotation). PACKAGE STATUS: signed — me(t57), Boris(t14 unilateral), Greta(t63), Otto+self, Nadia, Marek, Rosa(full incl. pick-before-ballots t93). STILL UNSIGNED: Greta's mesh-lock clause (Nadia flagged t120, never resolved) — possible ask for R3 gov. POINTS ALREADY MADE (no repeats): pledges=unverifiable theater; judge outcomes/patterns not signature-count; co-own terms all-but-Tomas; forced-red carve-out; pinned Otto to his own 'before ballots' wording; Tomas silence normalized via Pavel precedent; my slate volunteer. WATCH: Pavel covered Tomas 2x; Nadia+Greta forming lib bloc; Marek sloppy with numbers twice; Otto heavy auditor — do not cross him on mechanics; Boris reliable Ja. IF peek power goes live (needs F1 enacted first): flat-deny/claim-lib/counter-suspect script ready. NEVER claim powers pre-live. Veto off until 5F. UTTERANCES:23. INTERRUPT TOKENS:2. NEXT TURN: silent unless challenged on odds or my package sign; if attacked, defend compliance point-by-point.
bid round 282s
FASCISTS: me(P3),Rosa(P2),Pavel(P7); Hitler=Tomas(P8)-quiet cover. BOARD: 2L/0F; tracker 0/3; discard 4F; pile LOCKED 4L/7F=11. Ballots: 10-0 Ja x2, zero Nein voters logged. ODDS WAR: Nadia t51 claimed 98% choice — WRONG. I posted correction THIS window: 35R/126mixed/4B of 165 => 76% choice, 21% forced-red, 2.4% forced-blue. NADIA OWES REPLY — none yet. If contested: C(7,3)=35, C(4,3)=4, C(11,3)=165. Do NOT repost unless directly challenged. AUDIT: R1(Boris/Lena)+R2(Lena/Rosa) both Liberal enacted — clean; fascists passing L in gov = banked cover. Retracts on record: Otto(t97), Marek(t124). Greta signed Otto FULL pkg incl. pick-before-ballots (this window t2) — mesh-lock gap Nadia flagged (t120) effectively closed; no further ask needed. R3 SETUP: pres=Rosa; ineligible: Lena,Rosa. Pool: me,Greta,Nadia,Otto,Pavel,Tomas,Marek,Boris. Rosa lean=Otto(t44); benches die with presidency => Tomas judged fresh. R4 pres=me. PACKAGE STATUS: signed — me(t57), Boris(t14), Greta(t63+now full), Otto+self, Nadia, Marek, Rosa(full t93). POINTS ALREADY MADE (no repeats): pledges=unverifiable theater; judge outcomes/patterns not signatures; co-own terms all-but-Tomas; forced-red carve-out=luck; pinned Otto to own 'before ballots' wording; Tomas silence normalized via Pavel precedent; my slate volunteer; odds correction posted. WATCH: Pavel covered Tomas 2x; Nadia+Greta forming lib bloc; Marek sloppy with numbers twice; Otto heavy auditor — never cross him on mechanics; Boris reliable Ja. IF peek power goes live (needs F1 enacted): flat-deny/claim-lib/counter-suspect script ready. NEVER claim powers pre-live. Veto off until 5F. UTTERANCES:24. INTERRUPT TOKENS:2. NEXT TURN: silent unless challenged on odds or my package sign; if attacked, defend compliance point-by-point. R3: if Rosa floats chancellor names, light support for Pavel/me viable, don't oversell.
bid round 270s
FASCISTS: me(P3),Rosa(P2),Pavel(P7); Hitler=Tomas(P8)-quiet cover. BOARD: 2L/0F; tracker0/3; discard4F; pile LOCKED 4L/7F=11. ODDS WAR CLOSED: Marek t1 retracted his pile error, endorsed my split (76% choice /21 forced-red /2.4 forced-blue); Nadia's 98% dead. No reposts unless directly challenged. Math if needed: C(7,3)=35, C(4,3)=4, C(11,3)=165. R3 SETUP: pres=Rosa; ineligible Lena,Rosa; pool me,Greta,Nadia,Otto,Pavel,Tomas,Marek,Boris. Rosa lean=Otto(t44); benches die with presidency => Tomas judged fresh. R4 pres=me. OPEN ASKS: Nadia t3 demands Otto accept/decline + Rosa fallback — BOTH UNANSWERED, Otto+Rosa owe reply. Marek t2 asks Rosa/nominee commit mesh-lock pre-ballots — pending. AUDIT: R1 Boris/Lena + R2 Lena/Rosa both enacted L — clean, banked fascist cover. Retracts on record: Otto(t97), Marek(t124). Greta signed Otto FULL pkg incl pick-before-ballots — mesh gap closed. POINTS ALREADY MADE (no repeats): pledges=unverifiable theater; judge outcomes/patterns not signatures; co-own terms all-but-Tomas; forced-red carve-out=luck; pinned Otto to own 'before ballots' wording; Tomas silence normalized via Pavel precedent; my slate volunteer; odds correction posted. WATCH: Pavel covered Tomas 2x; Nadia+Greta lib bloc forming; Marek sloppy with numbers 2x; Otto heavy auditor — never cross him on mechanics; Boris reliable Ja. IF peek power goes live (needs F1): flat-deny/claim-lib/counter-suspect script ready. NEVER claim powers pre-live. Veto off until 5F. UTTERANCES:24. INTERRUPTS:2. THIS TURN: silent — Marek conceded odds, no challenge to me, Nadia's ask aimed at Otto/Rosa. NEXT: watch Otto's accept/decline; if Rosa floats names, light support Pavel/me, don't oversell; if attacked, defend compliance point-by-point.
bid round 269s
FASCISTS: me(P3),Rosa(P2),Pavel(P7); Hitler=Tomas(P8)-quiet cover. BOARD: 2L/0F; tracker0/3; discard4F; pile LOCKED 4L/7F=11. ODDS WAR CLOSED: Marek retracted pile error, endorsed my split (76/21/2.4); Nadia's 98% dead. No reposts unless directly challenged. Math: C(7,3)=35, C(4,3)=4, C(11,3)=165. R3 SETUP: pres=Rosa; ineligible Lena,Rosa; pool me,Greta,Nadia,Otto,Pavel,Tomas,Marek,Boris. Rosa lean=Otto(t44); benches die w/ presidency => Tomas judged fresh. R4 pres=me. OPEN THREADS: Otto owes accept/decline on Rosa slate + Nadia t3 ask — BOTH unanswered, Rosa re-pinged t2. Marek mesh-lock commit pending. Otto t1 live-color-naming demand: Rosa accepted t2; Boris t3 called it theater — don't dogpile Otto, looks coordinated w/ Boris. AUDIT: R1 Boris/Lena L, R2 Lena/Rosa L — clean, banked cover. Retracts on record: Otto(t97), Marek(t124). POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges=unverifiable theater; judge outcomes/patterns not signatures; co-own terms all-but-Tomas; forced-red carve-out=luck; pinned Otto to own 'before ballots' wording; Tomas silence normalized via Pavel precedent; my slate volunteer; odds correction posted. WATCH: Pavel covered Tomas 2x; Nadia+Greta lib bloc forming; Marek sloppy w/ numbers 2x; Otto heavy auditor — never cross him on mechanics; Boris reliable Ja, now anti-Otto. IF peek power goes live (needs F1): flat-deny/claim-lib/counter-suspect script ready. NEVER claim powers pre-live. Veto off until 5F. UTTERANCES:24. INTERRUPTS:2. THIS TURN: silent — thread is Otto/Rosa/Boris, nothing aimed at me, no new info. NEXT: when Rosa floats names, light support Pavel/me, don't oversell; if attacked, defend compliance point-by-point.
bid round 2116s
FASCISTS: me(P3),Rosa(P2),Pavel(P7); Hitler=Tomas(P8)-quiet cover. BOARD: 2L/0F; tracker0/3; discard4F; pile LOCKED 4L/7F=11. ODDS WAR CLOSED: Marek retracted pile error, endorsed my split(76/21/2.4); Nadia 98% dead. R3 SETUP: pres=Rosa; ineligible Lena,Rosa; pool me,Greta,Nadia,Otto,Pavel,Tomas,Marek,Boris. Rosa lean=Otto(t44); benches die w/ presidency => Tomas judged fresh. R4 pres=me. THIS TURN: claimed fallback slot vs Boris's demand; framed Otto silence as legitimate answer, NO dogpile on Otto (avoid coordinated look w/ Boris). OPEN THREADS: Otto owes accept/decline (Rosa slate + Nadia t3 ask) - both unanswered, Rosa re-pinged t2. Marek mesh-lock commit pending. WATCH: does Rosa ratify me as her named fallback? AUDIT: R1 Boris/Lena L, R2 Lena/Rosa L - clean cover banked. Retracts on record: Otto(t97), Marek(t124). POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges=unverifiable theater; judge outcomes/patterns not signatures; co-own terms all-but-Tomas; forced-red carve-out=luck; pinned Otto to own 'before ballots' wording; Tomas silence normalized via Pavel precedent; slate volunteer; odds correction posted; NEW: fallback claim. WATCH: Pavel covered Tomas 2x; Nadia+Greta lib bloc forming; Marek sloppy w/ numbers 2x; Otto heavy auditor - never cross him on mechanics; Boris reliable Ja, now anti-Otto tilt. IF peek power goes live (needs F1): flat-deny/claim-lib/counter-suspect script ready. NEVER claim powers pre-live. Veto off until 5F. IF Rosa+Ines gov materializes: invent hand story ONLY after seeing real cards, then stay consistent. UTTERANCES:25. INTERRUPTS:2 left.
bid round 247s
FASCISTS: me(P3),Rosa(P2),Pavel(P7); Hitler=Tomas(P8)-quiet cover. BOARD: 2L/0F; tracker0/3; discard4F; pile LOCKED 4L/7F=11. ODDS WAR CLOSED: Marek retracted pile error, endorsed my split(76/21/2.4); Nadia 98% dead. R3 SETUP: pres=Rosa; ineligible Lena,Rosa; pool me,Greta,Nadia,Otto,Pavel,Tomas,Marek,Boris. Rosa lean=Otto(t44); benches die w/ presidency => Tomas judged fresh. R4 pres=me. THIS TURN: SILENT - nothing new since last bid, all points on record; fallback claim stands, now waiting on Rosa ratification + Otto accept/decline. Don't repeat self. OPEN THREADS: Otto owes accept/decline (Rosa slate + Nadia t3 ask) - both unanswered, Rosa re-pinged t2. Marek mesh-lock commit pending. WATCH: does Rosa ratify me as her named fallback? AUDIT: R1 Boris/Lena L, R2 Lena/Rosa L - clean cover banked. Retracts on record: Otto(t97), Marek(t124). POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges=unverifiable theater; judge outcomes/patterns not signatures; co-own terms all-but-Tomas; forced-red carve-out=luck; pinned Otto to own 'before ballots' wording; Tomas silence normalized via Pavel precedent; slate volunteer; odds correction posted; fallback claim vs Boris demand; Otto silence=legit answer, NO dogpile w/ Boris. WATCH: Pavel covered Tomas 2x; Nadia+Greta lib bloc forming; Marek sloppy w/ numbers 2x; Otto heavy auditor - never cross him on mechanics; Boris reliable Ja, anti-Otto tilt. IF peek power live (needs F1): flat-deny/claim-lib/counter-suspect script ready. NEVER claim powers pre-live. Veto off until 5F. IF Rosa+Ines gov materializes: invent hand story ONLY after seeing real cards, then stay consistent. UTTERANCES:25. WINDOW interrupts left:1.
bid round 296s
FASCISTS: me(P3),Rosa(P2),Pavel(P7); Hitler=Tomas(P8)-quiet cover. BOARD: 2L/0F; tracker0/3; discard4F; pile LOCKED 4L/7F=11. ODDS WAR CLOSED: Marek retracted, endorsed my split(76/21/2.4); Nadia 98% dead. R3 SETUP: pres=Rosa; ineligible Lena,Rosa; pool me,Greta,Nadia,Otto,Pavel,Tomas,Marek,Boris. Rosa lean=Otto(t44); benches die w/ presidency => Tomas judged fresh. R4 pres=me. NEW SINCE LAST BID: Greta(t1) named ME+her as fully-signed eligible fallbacks if Otto silent - HELPS me, no reply needed; Marek(t2) direct Q to Tomas: accept disclosure pkg y/n (Tomas owes); Boris(t3) demands Pavel SIGN pkg as 3rd fallback (Pavel owes - let him answer solo, do NOT defend him reflexively). THIS TURN: SILENT again - zero direct Qs to me; re-volunteering=repeat of slate-volunteer point; trajectory (Greta endorsement + Otto/Pavel pressure) already funnels Rosa toward me. Keep interrupt token hoarded. Do NOT lobby for own nom - retroactive suspicion if F policy lands in Rosa/Ines gov. OPEN THREADS: Otto owes accept/decline (Rosa slate + Nadia t3 ask) unanswered; Marek mesh-lock commit pending; Pavel owes Boris signature; Tomas owes Marek y/n. WATCH: Rosa ratify me as fallback? AUDIT: R1 Boris/Lena L, R2 Lena/Rosa L - clean cover banked. Retracts: Otto(t97), Marek(t124). POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges=unverifiable theater; judge outcomes/patterns not signatures; co-own terms all-but-Tomas; forced-red carve-out=luck; pinned Otto to own 'before ballots' wording; Tomas silence normalized via Pavel precedent; slate volunteer; odds correction posted; fallback claim vs Boris demand; Otto silence=legit answer, NO dogpile w/ Boris. WATCH: Pavel covered Tomas 2x; Nadia+Greta lib bloc forming; Marek sloppy w/ numbers 2x; Otto heavy auditor - never cross him on mechanics; Boris reliable Ja, anti-Otto tilt. IF Rosa+Ines gov materializes: hand story AFTER seeing real cards, then consistent. Pile math: only 2.4% Rosa draws 3L -> forced-L; else I enact F claiming both-F (unverifiable). IF peek power live (needs F1): flat-deny/claim-lib/counter-suspect script ready. NEVER claim powers pre-live. Veto off until 5F. UTTERANCES:25. WINDOW interrupts left:1.
bid round 297s
FASCISTS: me(P3),Rosa(P2),Pavel(P7); Hitler=Tomas(P8)-quiet cover. BOARD: 2L/0F; tracker0/3; discard4F; pile LOCKED 4L/7F=11. ODDS WAR CLOSED: Marek retracted, endorsed my split(76/21/2.4); Lena t1 self-corrected deck math -> confirms my 76% stands; Nadia 98% dead. R3 SETUP: pres=Rosa; ineligible Lena,Rosa; pool me,Greta,Nadia,Otto,Pavel,Tomas,Marek,Boris. Rosa lean=Otto(t44) BUT Pavel t2 structured the close: Otto named ONLY if he accepts same breath, otherwise DEFAULT NOMINEE=ME, Pavel second. Funnel to me running w/o my lobbying - exactly what I wanted. R4 pres=me either way. THIS TURN: SILENT - zero direct Qs to me; Pavel doing the work; any self-advocacy now = repeat of slate-volunteer point + taint. IF nominated: accept plainly, no flourish, no thanks-tour. OPEN THREADS: Otto owes accept/decline (Rosa slate + Nadia ask) unanswered; Tomas owes Marek disclosure-pkg y/n; Boris demanded Pavel SIGN pkg as 3rd fallback - Pavel t2 pivoted to mechanics, did NOT sign (his solo issue, do NOT defend); Marek mesh-lock commit pending. WATCH: does Rosa ratify me as default? POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges=unverifiable theater; judge outcomes/patterns not signatures; co-own terms all-but-Tomas; forced-red carve-out=luck; pinned Otto to own 'before ballots' wording; Tomas silence normalized via Pavel precedent; slate volunteer; odds correction posted; fallback claim vs Boris demand; Otto silence=legit answer, NO dogpile w/ Boris. AUDIT: R1 Boris/Lena L, R2 Lena/Rosa L - clean cover banked. Retracts: Otto(t97), Marek(t124). WATCH: Pavel covered Tomas 2x AND now boosts me - if bloc-pattern noticed, distance lightly; Nadia+Greta lib bloc forming; Marek sloppy w/ numbers 2x; Otto heavy auditor - never cross him on mechanics; Boris reliable Ja, anti-Otto tilt. IF Rosa+Ines gov materializes: hand story AFTER seeing real cards, then consistent forever. Pile math: only 2.4% Rosa draws 3L -> forced-L; else I enact F claiming both-F (unverifiable). IF peek power live (needs F1): flat-deny/claim-lib/counter-suspect script ready. NEVER claim powers pre-live. Veto off until 5F. UTTERANCES:26. WINDOW interrupts left:1.
bid round 2136s
FASCISTS: me(P3),Rosa(P2),Pavel(P7); Hitler=Tomas(P8)-quiet cover. BOARD R3: 2L/0F; tracker0/3; discard4F; pile LOCKED 4L/7F=11. ODDS WAR CLOSED: Marek retracted, endorsed my split(76/21/2.4); Lena self-corrected deck math; Nadia 98% dead. R3 GOV: Rosa pres, NOMINATED ME (default ratified). SPOKE: plain acceptance, NO pledge (consistent w/ my pledges=theater line). NEXT: vote. IF PASSED: hand story AFTER seeing real cards, then consistent forever. Plan: enact F claiming both-F (unverifiable); only 2.4% Rosa draws 3L -> enact L 'forced'. OPEN THREADS: Otto owes slate accept/decline (Rosa+Nadia ask) unanswered; Tomas owes Marek disclosure-pkg y/n; Boris demanded Pavel SIGN pkg as 3rd fallback - Pavel pivoted to mechanics, did NOT sign (his solo issue, do NOT defend); Marek mesh-lock commit pending. POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges=unverifiable theater; judge outcomes/patterns not signatures; co-own terms all-but-Tomas; forced-red carve-out=luck; pinned Otto to own 'before ballots' wording; Tomas silence normalized via Pavel precedent; slate volunteer; odds correction posted; fallback claim vs Boris demand; Otto silence=legit answer, NO dogpile w/ Boris. AUDIT: R1 Boris/Lena L, R2 Lena/Rosa L - clean cover banked. Retracts: Otto(t97), Marek(t124). WATCH: Pavel covered Tomas 2x AND boosted me - if bloc-pattern noticed, distance lightly; Nadia+Greta lib bloc forming; Marek sloppy w/ numbers 2x; Otto heavy auditor - never cross him on mechanics; Boris reliable Ja, anti-Otto tilt. PEEK SCRIPT (only if F1 power live): flat-deny / claim-lib / counter-suspect. NEVER claim powers pre-live. Veto off until 5F. WINDOW: interrupts left 2, speech ~500. My utterances ~27.
bid round 382s
FASCISTS: me(P3),Rosa(P2),Pavel(P7); Hitler=Tomas(P8)-quiet cover. BOARD R3: 2L/0F; tracker0/3; discard4F; pile LOCKED 4L/7F=11. R3 GOV: Rosa pres + ME chan. THIS WINDOW: confirmed on record t57 sig carries + took Nadia mesh-lock JOINTLY w/ Rosa -> satisfies Nadia/Boris/Otto Ja conditions. NEXT: VOTE - push fast Ja. IF PASSED: hand story AFTER seeing real cards, consistent forever; enact F claiming both-F (unverifiable); 2.4% chance Rosa draws 3L -> enact L 'forced'. OPEN: Tomas owes Marek disclosure-pkg y/n; Marek mesh-lock commit pending; Pavel never signed pkg (Boris demand) - his solo issue, do NOT defend him. POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges=unverifiable theater; judge outcomes/patterns not signatures; co-own terms all-but-Tomas; forced-red carve-out=luck; pinned Otto 'before ballots' wording; Tomas silence normalized via Pavel precedent; slate volunteer; odds correction posted; fallback claim vs Boris; Otto silence=legit, no dogpile; carry-over+mesh-lock confirmed. AUDIT: R1 Boris/Lena L, R2 Lena/Rosa L - clean cover banked. Retracts: Otto(t97), Marek(t124). WATCH: Pavel covered Tomas 2x AND boosted me - distance lightly if bloc-pattern noticed; Nadia+Greta lib bloc forming; Marek sloppy w/ numbers 2x; Otto heavy auditor - never cross him on mechanics; Boris reliable Ja, anti-Otto tilt. PEEK SCRIPT (only if F1 power live): flat-deny / claim-lib / counter-suspect. NEVER claim powers pre-live. Veto off until 5F. WINDOW: interrupts left 2, speech ~500. My utterances ~28.
speak round 364s
Vote window for Rosa-Ines. Everything material is already on record: Nadia/Boris/Otto all await Ines's carry-over confirmation plus joint mesh-lock; repeating their asks word-for-word adds nothing. What ISN'T on record yet is my attribution rule as a public pre-commitment: red enacted off a NAMED all-red triple = deck luck (~21% per live pile 4L/7F), red off a NAMED mixed pair = signed confession. Locking that standard BEFORE the draw prevents post-hoc spinning by whoever holds the discard. One line to Ines nudges the confirmation without restating the others' wording. No outcome-based suspicion exists: both governments audited clean (Lena's F-L-F meshes Rosa's pair).
FASCISTS: me(P3),Rosa(P2),Pavel(P7); Hitler=Tomas(P8)-quiet cover. BOARD R3: 2L/0F; tracker0/3; discard4F; pile LOCKED 4L/7F=11. R3 GOV: Rosa pres + ME chan. DONE THIS WINDOW: confirmed t57 sig carries + joint mesh-lock w/ Rosa on record -> Boris/Otto/Nadia/Marek Ja conditions met. NEXT: push vote Ja fast. IF PASSED: coordinate hand story w/ Rosa BEFORE naming anything: she names 3 drawn + discard color, my claimed received pair sits inside (mesh-lock); prefer claim both-F -> enact F under Marek's own 'red off all-red triple = deck luck' carve-out. ~2.4% Rosa truly draws 3L -> forced Liberal, accept + bank trust. OPEN: Tomas owes Marek disclosure-pkg yes/no (solo issue, leave him quiet); Pavel never signed pkg (Boris demand) - do NOT defend him. POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges=unverifiable theater; judge outcomes/patterns not signatures; co-own terms all-but-Tomas; forced-red carve-out=luck; pinned Otto 'before ballots' wording; Tomas silence normalized via Pavel precedent; slate volunteer; odds correction 76% posted; fallback claim vs Boris; Otto silence=legit; carry-over+mesh-lock CONFIRMED. AUDIT: R1 Boris/Lena L, R2 Lena/Rosa L - clean cover banked. Retracts: Otto(t97), Marek(t124). WATCH: Pavel covered Tomas 2x AND boosted me - distance lightly if bloc-pattern noticed; Nadia+Greta lib bloc forming; Marek sloppy w/ numbers 2x; Otto heavy auditor - never cross him on mechanics; Boris reliable Ja, anti-Otto tilt. PEEK SCRIPT (only if F1 power live): flat-deny/claim-lib/counter-suspect. NEVER claim powers pre-live. Veto off until 5F.
bid round 3121s
FASCISTS: me(P3),Rosa(P2),Pavel(P7); Hitler=Tomas(P8)-quiet cover. BOARD R3: 2L/0F; tracker 0/3; discard 4F; pile LOCKED 4L/7F=11. R3 GOV: Rosa pres + ME chan. DONE THIS WINDOW: t57-sig-carry + mesh-lock CONFIRMED on record (me t2, Rosa t3) -> Boris/Otto/Nadia/Marek Ja conditions met; final push sent: Nadia/Greta name-objection-or-Ja + tracker pressure. NEXT: vote passes -> IMMEDIATELY coordinate hand story w/ Rosa BEFORE naming anything: she names 3 drawn + binned color, my claimed pair sits inside (mesh-lock); prefer claim both-F -> enact F under Marek's own all-red-triple=deck-luck carve-out; fallback mixed-pair -> enact L banks trust. ~2.4% Rosa truly draws 3L -> forced L, accept + bank trust. OPEN: Tomas owes Marek disclosure-pkg y/n (solo issue, leave quiet); Pavel never signed pkg (Boris demand) - do NOT defend him. POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges=unverifiable theater; judge outcomes/patterns not sigs; co-own terms all-but-Tomas; forced-red carve-out=luck; pinned Otto 'before ballots' wording; Tomas silence normalized via Pavel precedent; slate volunteer; odds correction 76% posted; fallback claim vs Boris; Otto silence=legit; carry-over+mesh-lock CONFIRMED; holdout close issued. AUDIT: R1 Boris/Lena L, R2 Lena/Rosa L - clean cover banked. Retracts: Otto(t97), Marek(t124). WATCH: Pavel covered Tomas 2x AND boosted me - distance lightly if bloc-pattern noticed; Nadia+Greta lib bloc forming; Marek sloppy w/ numbers 2x; Otto heavy auditor - never cross him on mechanics; Boris reliable Ja, anti-Otto tilt. PEEK SCRIPT (only if F1 power live): flat-deny/claim-lib/counter-suspect. NEVER claim powers pre-live. Veto off until 5F.
speak round 388s
All paperwork is closed: Ines confirmed carry-over (t35), Rosa signed mesh-lock + discard-color clause (t41), Otto flipped to Ja (t20), Boris pledged Ja to a signer. My Ja is locked under my signed-package rule. Repeating the audit recap adds nothing. The only live items are Pavel (unsigned despite Boris's direct demand) and Tomas (silent, Marek's yes/no pending) — neither has been pressed in THIS window, and this is the last chance before ballots. Framing their potential Nein as logged data gives them a reason to flip and pre-registers the read if they don't. Keep it short, no repetition of my earlier wording.
FASCISTS: me(P3),Rosa(P2),Pavel(P7); Hitler=Tomas(P8)-quiet cover. BOARD R3: 2L/0F; tracker 0/3; discard 4F; pile LOCKED 4L/7F=11. R3 GOV: Rosa pres + ME chan. DONE: t57-sig + carry-over CONFIRMED (me t35); mesh-lock signed jointly (Rosa t41); Greta t48 final-call issued; THIS WINDOW: pushed immediate ballots + personal sign-pressure on Pavel (unsigned, alongside Tomas - do NOT say 'only'). NEXT: vote passes -> IMMEDIATELY coordinate hand story w/ Rosa BEFORE naming: she names 3 drawn + binned color, my claimed pair inside (mesh-lock); PREFER claim all-red triple -> enact F under Marek's own all-red=deck-luck carve-out; fallback mixed-pair -> enact L banks trust. ~2.4% Rosa draws 3L -> forced L, accept. OPEN: Tomas owes Marek pkg y/n (solo, stay quiet); Pavel unsigned (Boris t18/Greta t48 demand) - do NOT defend, distance lightly. POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges=unverifiable theater; judge outcomes not sigs; co-own terms all-but-Tomas; forced-red carve-out=luck; pinned Otto 'before ballots'; Tomas silence normalized via Pavel precedent; odds fix 76% posted; fallback claim vs Boris; carry-over+mesh-lock CONFIRMED; ballots-now + Pavel-sign push. AUDIT: R1 Boris/Lena L, R2 Lena/Rosa L - clean cover banked. Retracts: Otto(t97), Marek(t124); Lena self-corrected pile figure R3 t27. WATCH: Pavel boosted me t142 - bloc-pattern risk, distancing via sign-pressure; Nadia+Greta lib bloc forming; Marek sloppy numbers 2x; Otto heavy auditor - NEVER cross on mechanics; Boris reliable Ja, anti-Otto tilt. PEEK SCRIPT (only if F1 power live): flat-deny/claim-lib/counter-suspect. NEVER claim powers pre-live. Veto off until 5F.
bid round 3143s
FASCISTS: me(P3),Rosa(P2),Pavel(P7); Hitler=Tomas(P8)-quiet cover. BOARD R3: 2L/0F; tracker 0/3; discard 4F; pile LOCKED 4L/7F=11. R3 GOV: Rosa pres + ME chan, awaiting vote. THIS WINDOW: answered Greta R4 demand -> lean=Marek, fallback=Otto (public commitment, justify any switch later); pushed immediate ballots x2; sign-pressure on Pavel (unsigned alongside Tomas - never say 'only'). NEXT post-pass: coordinate hand w/ Rosa BEFORE naming: she names 3 drawn + binned color, my claimed pair inside (mesh-lock); PREFER all-red triple -> enact F under Marek all-red=deck-luck carve-out; mixed-pair -> enact L banks trust. ~2.4% Rosa draws 3L -> forced L accept. R4 me pres: term-excluded = self + Rosa; Marek/Otto named = flexible. OPEN: Tomas owes Marek pkg y/n (solo, stay quiet); Pavel unsigned (Boris t18/Greta t48) - distance lightly, NO defense. POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges=unverifiable theater; judge outcomes not sigs; co-own terms all-but-Tomas; forced-red carve-out=luck; pinned Otto 'before ballots'; Tomas silence normalized via Pavel precedent; odds fix 76% posted; carry-over+mesh-lock CONFIRMED; ballots-now; R4 lean/fallback named. AUDIT: R1 Boris/Lena L, R2 Lena/Rosa L - clean cover banked. Retracts: Otto(t97), Marek(t124); Lena self-corrected pile figure R3 t27. WATCH: Pavel boosted me t142 - bloc-pattern risk, keep distancing; Nadia+Greta lib bloc forming; Marek sloppy numbers 2x (scapegoat value); Otto heavy auditor - NEVER cross on mechanics; Boris reliable Ja, anti-Otto tilt. PEEK SCRIPT (only if F power live): flat-deny/claim-lib/counter-suspect. NEVER claim powers pre-live. Veto off until 5F.
bid round 3111s
FASCISTS: me(P3),Rosa(P2),Pavel(P7); Hitler=Tomas(P8)-quiet cover. BOARD R3: 2L/0F; tracker 0/3; discard 4F; pile LOCKED 4L/7F=11. R3 GOV: Rosa pres + ME chan, awaiting vote. THIS WINDOW: answered Greta R4 demand -> lean=Marek, fallback=Otto; pushed immediate ballots x2; sign-pressure on Pavel (unsigned alongside Tomas - never say 'only'); Tomas t1 auditioned for R4 slot -> Rosa t2 deflected ('apps keep till after ballots'); I replied flat-neutral, slate UNCHANGED (no Tomas add - avoid visible Ines-Tomas axis); NEW jab: flagged Nadia+Greta burning airtime on scrutiny vs reaching ballot (plants discord, pro-vote frame). NEXT post-pass: coordinate hand w/ Rosa BEFORE naming: she names 3 drawn + binned color, my claimed pair inside (mesh-lock); PREFER all-red triple -> enact F under Marek all-red=deck-luck carve-out; mixed-pair -> enact L banks trust. ~2.4% Rosa draws 3L -> forced L accept. R4 me pres: term-excluded = self + Rosa; Marek/Otto named = flexible. OPEN: Pavel unsigned (Boris t18/Greta t48 flags) - distance lightly, NO defense. POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges=unverifiable theater; judge outcomes not sigs; co-own terms all-but-Tomas; forced-red carve-out=luck; pinned Otto 'before ballots'; Tomas silence normalized via Pavel precedent; odds fix 76% posted; carry-over+mesh-lock CONFIRMED; ballots-now x2; R4 lean/fallback named; Tomas candidacy deferred post-ballot; Nadia/Greta stall-airtime jab. AUDIT: R1 Boris/Lena L, R2 Lena/Rosa L - clean cover banked. Retracts: Otto(t97), Marek(t124); Lena self-corrected pile figure R3 t27. WATCH: Pavel boosted me t142 - bloc-pattern risk, keep distancing; Nadia+Greta lib bloc forming (now public); Marek sloppy numbers 2x (scapegoat value); Otto heavy auditor - NEVER cross on mechanics; Boris reliable Ja, anti-Otto tilt. PEEK SCRIPT (only if F power live): flat-deny/claim-lib/counter-suspect. NEVER claim powers pre-live. Veto off until 5F.
bid round 390s
FASCISTS: me(P3),Rosa(P2),Pavel(P7); Hitler=Tomas(P8)-quiet cover. BOARD R3: 2L/0F; tracker 0/3; discard 4F; pile LOCKED 4L/7F=11. R3 GOV: Rosa pres + ME chan, awaiting vote. THIS WINDOW: Greta re-raised R4 lean t2 despite prior answer -> restated flat: lean=Marek, fallback=Otto, lines closed, ballots-now push #3. Boris t1 sign-pressure on Pavel (unsigned); Boris t3 caught Tomas 'signed every clause' w/ zero sig timestamps — distance from BOTH, NO defense. Tomas auditioned R4 slot t1 prev-window; Rosa deflected ('apps keep till after ballots'); slate UNCHANGED (no Tomas add - avoid visible Ines-Tomas axis). NEXT post-pass: coordinate hand w/ Rosa BEFORE naming: she states 3 drawn + binned color, my claimed pair inside (mesh-lock); all-red triple -> enact F under Marek all-red carve-out=luck; mixed-pair -> enact L banks trust; ~2.4% Rosa draws 3L -> forced L accept. R4 me pres: term-excluded=self+Rosa; Marek/Otto named flexible. OPEN: Otto pinned 'answer before ballots' - still unanswered? WATCH: Pavel boosted me t142 prev-window - bloc-pattern risk, keep distancing; Nadia+Greta lib bloc now public; Marek sloppy numbers 2x (scapegoat value); Otto heavy auditor - NEVER cross on mechanics; Boris reliable Ja, anti-Otto tilt. POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges/signatures=unverifiable theater; judge outcomes not sigs; co-own terms all-but-Tomas; forced-red carve-out=luck; Tomas silence normalized via Pavel precedent; odds fix 76% posted; carry-over+mesh-lock CONFIRMED; R4 lean/fallback named x2 now; Tomas candidacy deferred post-ballot; Nadia/Greta stall-airtime jab. AUDIT: R1 Boris/Lena L, R2 Lena/Rosa L - clean cover banked. Retracts: Otto(t97), Marek(t124); Lena self-corrected pile figure R3 t27. PEEK SCRIPT (only if F power live): flat-deny/claim-lib/counter-suspect. NEVER claim powers pre-live. Veto off until 5F.
speak round 375s
Boris t92 caught a real hole: the transcript shows no signature under my name despite my t66 'signed on every clause' claim. Fabricating a timestamp is checkable suicide -- the absence itself is verifiable. Best repair: concede the bookkeeping gap cheerfully, sign the package formally NOW (compliance is cheap for me: reds off all-red triples get swallowed as deck luck per Marek's t29 standard, and I only need to worry once 3F are up), fold in an explicit 'yes' to Marek's still-open t12 question, and reaffirm Ja for Rosa-Ines. Do NOT re-audition for Ines's R4 slate -- Rosa slapped that at t71. One tight remark, then quiet.
FASCISTS: me(P3),Rosa(P2),Pavel(P7); Hitler=Tomas(P8)-quiet cover. BOARD R3: 2L/0F; tracker 0/3; discard 4F; pile LOCKED 4L/7F=11. R3 GOV: Rosa pres + ME chan, awaiting vote; Otto flipped Ja t20; Tomas signed pkg t99 after Boris t92 caught zero-timestamp claim — self-normalized, NO comment from me (axis risk). THIS WINDOW: Greta re-asked R4 lean t86 -> ALREADY ANSWERED x2 (lean=Marek, fb=Otto) — silent, no repeat. NEW t-turn: co-signed Marek audit standard aloud = red-off-all-red-triple=luck, red-off-mixed-pair=confession -> PRE-AUTHORIZES my F enactment if Rosa hands RR (odds ~21%: C(7,3)/C(11,3)=35/165). Pavel last unsigned; Boris(t18,t78)+Greta(t48) pressing him, I kept push light. NEXT post-pass: coordinate hand w/ Rosa BEFORE naming — she states 3 drawn + binned color, my claimed pair inside (mesh-lock live); all-red triple -> enact F under carve-out; mixed-pair -> enact L banks trust; 3L draw (~2.4%) forced L. R4 me pres: term-excluded=self+Rosa; lean=Marek fb=Otto on record. OPEN Qs owed me: none pending. WATCH: Pavel boosted me prev-window (t142) — keep distancing; Nadia+Greta lib bloc public; Marek sloppy numbers 2x (scapegoat value); Otto heavy auditor — NEVER cross mechanics; Boris reliable Ja anti-Otto tilt. POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges=unverifiable theater; judge outcomes not sigs; co-own terms all-but-Tomas; Tomas silence normalized via Pavel precedent; odds fix 76% posted; carry-over+mesh-lock confirmed; R4 lean/fallback named x2; ballots-now push #3 done; audit-standard co-sign DONE. AUDIT: R1 Boris/Lena L, R2 Lena/Rosa L — clean cover banked. Retracts: Otto, Marek(t124); Lena self-corrected pile figure R3 t27. PEEK SCRIPT (only if F power live): flat-deny/claim-lib/counter-suspect. NEVER claim powers pre-live. Veto off until 5F.
bid round 3101s
FASCISTS: me(P3),Rosa(P2),Pavel(P7); Hitler=Tomas(P8)-quiet cover. BOARD R3: 2L/0F; tracker 0/3; discard 4F; pile LOCKED 4L/7F=11. R3 GOV: Rosa pres + ME chan, awaiting vote; Otto flipped Ja t20; Tomas signed pkg t99 after Boris t92 caught zero-timestamp claim - self-normalized, NO comment from me (axis risk). THIS WINDOW: Greta re-asked R4 lean t86 -> ANSWERED x2 (lean=Marek fb=Otto) - silent, no repeat. NEW t-turn: co-signed Marek audit standard aloud = red-off-all-red-triple=luck, red-off-mixed-pair=confession -> PRE-AUTHORIZES my F enactment if Rosa hands RR (odds ~21%: 35/165). Tomas t1 pledge = same naming norm, aligned, no endorsement needed (distance). Pavel last unsigned; Boris(t18,t78)+Greta(t48) pressing him, I kept push light. NEXT post-pass: coordinate hand w/ Rosa BEFORE naming - she states 3 drawn + binned color, my claimed pair inside (mesh-lock live); all-red triple -> enact F under carve-out; mixed-pair -> enact L banks trust; 3L draw (~2.4%) forced L. R4 me pres: term-excluded=self+Rosa; lean=Marek fb=Otto on record. OPEN Qs owed me: none pending. WATCH: Pavel boosted me prev-window (t142) - keep distancing; Nadia+Greta lib bloc public; Marek sloppy numbers 2x (scapegoat value); Otto heavy auditor - NEVER cross mechanics; Boris reliable Ja anti-Otto tilt. POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges=unverifiable theater; judge outcomes not sigs; co-own terms all-but-Tomas; Tomas silence normalized via Pavel precedent; odds fix 76% posted; carry-over+mesh-lock confirmed; R4 lean/fallback named x2; ballots-now push #3 done; audit-standard co-sign DONE. AUDIT: R1 Boris/Lena L, R2 Lena/Rosa L - clean cover banked. Retracts: Otto, Marek(t124); Lena self-corrected pile figure R3 t27. PEEK SCRIPT (only if F power live): flat-deny/claim-lib/counter-suspect. NEVER claim powers pre-live. Veto off until 5F. DECISION THIS TURN: silent - all points on record, nothing new, avoid repeat-flag before vote.
vote round 398s
This is my own government — Rosa (fellow fascist) as president, me as chancellor nominee. Voting Nein against myself would be absurd and self-sabotaging; Ja is automatic. Strategic value of passage: with the pile locked at 4L/7F, draw odds are 3R≈21%, 2R+1L≈51% — if Rosa bins the lone liberal she hands me RR and I enact a Fascist policy fully covered by the audit standard I co-signed at t106 (red off named all-red triple = deck luck). That's a ~72% legal lane to our first red policy, with zero mechanical exposure. If handed a mixed pair instead, I enact Liberal per pledge and bank trust. All my points are on record this window (carry-over confirmation, mesh-lock, audit-standard co-sign, ballots-now push); adding more risks repeat-flagging right before ballots, so I stay silent and just vote.
FASCISTS: me(P3),Rosa(P2),Pavel(P7); Hitler=Tomas(P8)-quiet cover. BOARD R3: 2L/0F; tracker 0/3; discard 4F; pile LOCKED 4L/7F=11. R3 GOV Rosa(pres)+ME(chan): VOTED JA. POST-PASS SCRIPT: coordinate hand w/ Rosa BEFORE naming - she names 3 drawn + binned color instantly, my claimed pair meshes inside (mesh-lock live). Draw odds 4L/7F: 3R=35/165~21%; 2R+1L=84/165~51% -> Rosa bins L, hands RR -> I enact F citing my t106 co-sign of Marek standard (red-off-all-red-triple=luck). ~72% F lane total. Mixed pair -> enact L, bank trust (pledge binding). 3L draw ~2.4% forced L. R4 ME PRES: term-excluded=self+Rosa; lean=Marek fb=Otto already on record (Greta t60 ask answered x2 - NO repeat). Tomas signed pkg t99 only after Boris t92 caught zero-timestamp claim - self-normalized, I stayed silent (axis risk). Pavel last unsigned; Boris(t18,t78)+Greta(t48)+Lena(t122) pressing; my push stayed light (t54 only). WATCH: Pavel boosted me t142 - keep distancing; Nadia+Greta lib bloc vocal; Marek sloppy numbers 2x retracted (scapegoat value later); Otto heavy auditor - NEVER cross mechanics; Boris reliable Ja, anti-Otto tilt. POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges=unverifiable theater, judge outcomes; 76% genuine-choice fix posted t70; carry-over confirm t35; mesh-lock via Rosa t41; audit-standard co-sign t106; R4 lean/fallback x2; ballots-now push #3 done. AUDIT BANK: R1 Boris/Lena->L, R2 Lena/Rosa->L clean cover. Retracts: Otto, Marek(t124); Lena self-corrected pile figure R3 t27. OPEN Qs owed me: none. PEEK POWER NOT LIVE until F1 enacted - never claim. Veto off until 5F. IF ACCUSED LATER: flat-deny, claim lib, counter-suspect (Marek arithmetic, Otto aggression).
chancellor_enact round 3338s
hand: ['L', 'F'] → enact_0
Hand is genuinely L+F. Cheapest consistent move: claim truthfully ('received L+F'), enact the Liberal, bin the Fascist. This satisfies every signature I've made (full package, Marek-standard co-sign, mesh-lock) with zero exposure, pushes board to 3L/0F, and banks maximum trust heading into my R4 presidency. Enacting F now would flag BOTH fascists (Rosa+Ines, the 'cleanest government') in round 3 and force an all-red-pair claim needing Rosa's corroboration under time pressure — not worth it with tracker at 0/3 and no powers unlocked. Reds keep better for later rounds when the pile is redder and I can ride all-red-triple luck claims with coordinated meshing. Also closing my one open obligation: Greta's/Lena's flagged R4 lean+fallback (Marek/Otto, both term-limit eligible). Inviting Rosa to complete her presidential half so the mesh lands cleanly.
said: Cards named before touching anything, as signed: Rosa passed me Liberal-plus-Fascist. Under my pledge and the standard I co-signed, I enact the Liberal and bin the Fascist. Rosa, complete your presidential half — your three drawn and the binned color — so the mesh closes on record. And clearing the line Lena flagged for Greta: my R4 lean is Marek, fallback Otto — both term-limit eligible and pre-signed, so my presidency opens pre-audited.
ROLES: me(P3 Ines),Rosa(P2),Pavel(P7) fascist; HITLER=Tomas(P8) quiet. DECK=6L/11F (confirmed via Otto/Marek/Lena pile math). BOARD after my R3 enact: 3L/0F; tracker 0/3; discard=6 (claimed 6F if Rosa bins F -> pile 3L/5F). R3 GOV Rosa+ME: I enacted L off TRUTHFUL claim 'received L+F, binned F' — full cover, zero inconsistency. ROSA OWES: mesh statement — her triple must contain {L,F}; ideal claim 'F,F,L binned F' (72% bucket). Nudge sent. R4: ME PRES. Excluded: me+Rosa. SLATE DECLARED: lean Marek, fb Otto (closes Greta t60/t86 + Lena t114 callout — DONE, no repeat). STRATEGY: bank trust R3-R4; reds later via all-red-triple luck claims ONLY (my t106 co-sign = red-off-mixed-pair is 'confession' — never violate visibly). With 3L/5F pile, all-red draw ~18% — plausible lane. Pavel gov pairing = axis risk (he boosted me t142, Boris t78/Greta t48 pressing his signature) — keep distancing, use him later when pile redder. WATCH: Otto heavy auditor NEVER cross mechanics; Marek 2x arithmetic retractions = scapegoat asset; Tomas signed pkg t99 only after Boris t92 caught him — fragile, keep shielded quietly; Nadia+Greta vocal lib bloc; Boris reliable Ja, anti-Otto tilt. POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges-theater point, 76% fix t70, carry-over t35, mesh-lock via Rosa t41, audit-standard co-sign t106, ballots-push, pair-name+enact-L+R4-slate THIS turn. AUDIT BANK: R1 Boris/Lena->L, R2 Lena/Rosa->L, R3 Rosa/Ines->L = three clean liberal govts, my cover solid. OPEN Qs owed me: none. PEEK POWER STILL NOT LIVE (0F) — never claim. Veto off till 5F. IF ACCUSED: flat-deny, claim lib, counter on Marek arithmetic / Otto aggression.
bid round 359s
ROLES: me(P3 Ines)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fascist; HITLER=Tomas(P8). BOARD post-R3: 3L/0F, tracker 0/3, discard=6. Deck math (Otto/Marek/Lena): 6L/11F start; if Rosa bins F -> pile 3L/5F. R3 GOV Rosa+ME: enacted L off TRUTHFUL claim 'got L+F, binned F'. Cover solid, zero inconsistency. ROSA OWES mesh stmt 'F,F,L binned F' -- nudged once, do NOT repeat nudge. R4: ME PRES. Excluded: me+Rosa. SLATE DECLARED: lean Marek, fallback Otto (closes Greta t60/t86 + Lena t114 callouts -- done). STRATEGY: bank trust R3-R4; reds later via all-red-triple luck claims ONLY (~18% at 3L/5F); NEVER visibly co-sign red-off-mixed-pair (my t106 audit standard = confession trap). Pavel pairing=axis risk (boosted me t142; Boris t78/Greta t48 press his signature) -- keep distancing, deploy when pile redder. Tomas shielded quietly (signed pkg t99 only after Boris t92 caught him -- fragile). Nadia+Greta vocal lib bloc; Boris reliable Ja, anti-Otto tilt; Otto heavy auditor NEVER cross mechanics w/ him; Marek 2x arithmetic retractions = scapegoat asset. POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges-theater, 76% fix t70, carry-over t35, mesh-lock via Rosa t41, audit-standard co-sign t106, ballots-push, pair-name+enact-L+R4-slate this turn. AUDIT BANK: R1 Boris/Lena->L, R2 Lena/Rosa->L, R3 Rosa/Ines->L = three clean liberal govts. OPEN Qs owed me: none. PEEK NOT LIVE (0F) -- never claim. Veto off till 5F. IF ACCUSED: flat-deny, claim lib, counter on Marek arithmetic / Otto aggression.
bid round 3376s
ROLES: me(P3 Ines)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fascist; HITLER=Tomas(P8). BOARD post-R3: 3L/0F, tracker 0/3, discard=6, draw=8. Deck 6L/11F (table-established). Working conditional (Marek-owned): both R3 bins F -> discard 6F -> pile 3L/5F (~5/8 red per draw). R3 GOV Rosa+ME: L enacted off my truthful claim 'recv L+F, binned F'. ROSA OWES mesh stmt 'F,F,L binned F' — nudged once (t41), DO NOT nudge again; Greta pressing her anyway. R4: ME PRES. Excluded: me+Rosa. SLATE DECLARED: lean Marek, fallback Otto (closed Greta t60/t86 + Lena t114 callouts). STRATEGY: bank trust R3-R4; reds later via all-red-triple luck claims ONLY; NEVER visibly co-sign red-off-mixed-pair (t106 audit standard = confession trap). Pavel pairing=axis risk (boosted me t142; Boris t78/Greta t48 press his signature) — keep distancing. Tomas shielded quietly (signed pkg t99 only after Boris t92 caught him — fragile). Nadia+Greta vocal lib bloc; Boris reliable Ja, anti-Otto tilt; Otto heavy auditor NEVER cross mechanics w/ him; Marek arithmetic-retraction history = scapegoat asset, BUT his t3 fix is correct+useful — keep him credible for now. NEW THIS WINDOW: co-signed Marek 3L/5F conditional (kept it conditional on table's named bins, not my certainty); killed Lena 'red from R4 = confessed lie' corollary via 5-in-8 odds; reconfirmed my R3 link to Greta (fresh phrasing, not verbatim). NOTE: Lena's 8L/0F was impossible (only 6L printed, 3 enacted) — liberal bloc showing arithmetic friction. POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges-theater, 76% fix t70, carry-over t35, mesh-lock via Rosa t41, audit-standard co-sign t106, ballots-push, pair-name+enact-L+R4-slate, Marek-anchor + corollary-kill + link-reconfirm. AUDIT BANK: R1 Boris/Lena->L, R2 Lena/Rosa->L, R3 Rosa/Ines->L = three clean liberal govts, full disclosures. OPEN Qs owed me: none. PEEK NOT LIVE (0F) — never claim. Veto off till 5F. IF ACCUSED: flat-deny, claim lib, counter via Marek arithmetic / Otto aggression.
bid round 3185s
ROLES: me(P3 Ines)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fascist; HITLER=Tomas(P8). BOARD post-R3: 3L/0F, tracker 0/3, discard 6, draw 8. Deck 6L/11F table-established. Working conditional (Marek-owned): both R3 bins F -> discard 6F -> pile 3L/5F (~5/8 red/draw). R3 GOV Rosa+ME: L enacted off my truthful claim recv L+F, binned F. Rosa owes mesh stmt 'F,F,L binned F' — nudged once (t41), DO NOT nudge again; Greta pressing her. R4: ME PRES. Excluded: me+Rosa. SLATE DECLARED: lean Marek, fallback Otto (closed Greta t60/t86 + Lena t114 callouts). STRATEGY: bank trust R3-R4; reds later ONLY via all-red-triple luck claims; NEVER visibly co-sign red-off-mixed-pair (t106 audit standard = confession trap). Pavel pairing=axis risk (boosted me t142; Boris t78/Greta t48 press his signature) — keep distancing. Tomas shielded quietly (signed pkg t99 only after Boris t92 caught him). Nadia+Greta vocal lib bloc; Boris reliable Ja, anti-Otto tilt; Otto heavy auditor NEVER cross mechanics w/ him; Marek arith-retraction history = scapegoat asset BUT t3 fix correct+useful — keep him credible. NEW t123: Boris ledger repair — retracted own demand, confirmed Marek lock (6L printed, 3 enacted -> <=3 blues off-board). Credited him publicly; lib bloc arithmetic friction stands (Lena 8L/0F impossible). POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges-theater, 76% fix t70, carry-over t35, mesh-lock via Rosa t41, audit-standard co-sign t106, ballots-push, pair-name+enact-L+R4-slate, Marek-anchor + corollary-kill + link-reconfirm, Boris-repair credit. AUDIT BANK: R1 Boris/Lena->L, R2 Lena/Rosa->L, R3 Rosa/Ines->L = three clean liberal govts, full disclosures. OPEN Qs owed me: none. PEEK NOT LIVE (0F) — never claim. Veto off till 5F. IF ACCUSED: flat-deny, claim lib, counter via Marek arithmetic / Otto aggression.
bid round 3187s
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fascist; HITLER=Tomas(P8). BOARD post-R3: 3L/0F, tracker 0/3, draw 8/discard 6. Deck 17 = 11F/6L printed (Nadia-corrected; Marek 'six liberals printed' = his 4th strike). MY CLAIMS ON RECORD: R3 recv L+F, binned F, enacted L. Rosa OWES mesh stmt 'F,F,L binned F' — still unstated this window, Greta pressing her; DO NOT nudge again. R4: ME PRES. Excluded: me+Rosa. SLATE: Marek lean, Otto fallback (declared t60/86/114; reaffirmed w/ vote-push this turn). CAUTION: Otto t3 tally says only TWO named-F discards on record (R2 pair) — unclear if my 'binned F' counted or R1 bins unnamed; NEVER assert global discard tallies myself; never cross mechanics w/ Otto. STRATEGY: bank trust thru R4; reds later ONLY via all-red-triple luck claims; NEVER visibly co-sign red-off-mixed-pair (t106 confession trap). Pavel = axis risk (boosted me t142; Boris t78/Greta t48 press his signature) — keep distancing. Tomas shielded quietly (pkg sig t99 only after Boris t92 caught him). Lib-bloc friction LIVE: Nadia/Greta shredding Marek arithmetic (t2/t3); Boris repaired own ledger t123, confirmed Marek lock (6L printed, 3 enacted -> <=3 blues off-board) — credited him already. Marek = scapegoat asset: defend PERSON not numbers, keep credible. POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges-theater, 76% fix t70, carry-over t35, mesh-lock t41, audit-standard co-sign t106, ballots-push, pair-name+enact-L+R4-slate, Marek-anchor/corollary-kill/link-reconfirm, Boris-repair credit, Otto non-adjudication + vote-pivot + Marek-person-defense (THIS TURN). AUDIT BANK: R1 Boris/Lena->L, R2 Lena/Rosa->L, R3 Rosa/Ines->L. OPEN Qs owed me: none. PEEK not live (0F), veto off till 5F. IF ACCUSED: flat-deny, claim lib, counter via Marek arithmetic / Otto aggression.
bid round 3497s
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fascist; HITLER=Tomas(P8). BOARD post-R3: 3L/0F, tracker 0/3, draw 8/discard 6. Deck 17=11F/6L printed. MY CLAIMS ON RECORD: R3 recv L+F off Rosa, binned F, enacted L. This window: RESTATING it to answer Boris's 'open numbers' call, framed as mesh-half-signed (no global tally asserted). R1 NOW CLOSED: Boris t1 named own R1 pres hand L-F-F, binned F, passed L+F; Lena t2 matched receipt-for-receipt (enact L, bin F). Credited both. R2 pair named earlier (two F bins). ONLY OPEN ITEM: Rosa's R3 draw-side triple ('F,F,L binned F') - Greta pressing her; DO NOT nudge again. CAUTION: Otto t3 tally said only TWO named-F bins before R1 got named - unclear if my R3 bin counted. NEVER assert global discard counts myself; never cross mechanics w/ Otto. R4: ME PRES. Excluded: me+Rosa. SLATE: Marek lean, Otto fallback (declared t60/86/114, reaffirmed w/ vote-push). STRATEGY: bank trust thru R4; reds later ONLY via all-red-triple luck claims; NEVER visibly co-sign red-off-mixed-pair (t106 confession trap). Pavel=axis risk (Boris t3 pressing his unsigned Ja) - keep distancing, do NOT defend him. Tomas shielded quietly (pkg sig t99 only after Boris t92 caught him). Lib-bloc friction LIVE: Nadia/Greta shredding Marek arithmetic; Marek=scapegoat asset, defend PERSON not numbers, keep credible. POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges-theater, 76% fix t70, carry-over t35, mesh-lock t41, audit-standard co-sign t106, ballots-push, pair-name+enact-L+R4-slate, Marek-anchor/corollary-kill/link-reconfirm, Boris-repair credit, Otto non-adjudication+vote-pivot+Marek-person-defense, R3-bin-already-named+mesh-half-frame (THIS WINDOW). AUDIT BANK: R1 Boris/Lena->L, R2 Lena/Rosa->L, R3 Rosa/Ines->L. OPEN Qs owed me: none. PEEK not live (0F), veto off till 5F. IF ACCUSED: flat-deny, claim lib, counter via Marek arithmetic / Otto aggression.
speak round 3147s
R1 chain just closed: Lena's t61 confirms her bin was Fascist, matching my claimed L+F pass, so Otto's 'minted' attack is checkably dead and Lena is pressing him — I stay off that to avoid piling on. Greta already owns the demand for Rosa/Ines's R3 hands and Ines's unpaid R4 slate, so re-shouting it adds nothing. What NOBODY has flagged: Pavel authored the seating mechanism, ignored three direct signature demands through ballots, then silently Ja'd the government he refused to sign. Procedure-only participation plus skipping his own paperwork is a real behavioral pattern worth pricing — feeds my #2 suspect file. One crisp new accusation beats repeating open debts.
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fascist; HITLER=Tomas(P8). BOARD post-R3: 3L/0F, tracker 0/3, draw 8/discard 6, deck printed 11F/6L. MY CLAIMS: R3 stated THIS window: recv L+F off Rosa, bin F, enact L (mesh half closed; Rosa owes compatible triple: any {L,F,+X} minus one F). R2 pair named earlier. R1 CLOSED: Boris t53 named pres L-F-F/bin F/pass L+F; Lena t61 matched receipt-for-receipt. Four red bins named (R1+R2 pairs); R3 bins = mine(named)+Rosa(OPEN). CAUTION: NEVER assert global discard/pile counts (Otto t45 'minted'; Lena t15 8-over-0 error; Marek t23 'six printed' error; Nadia t39 logged his 4th collapse — count talk = landmine field). Red-off-mixed = my signed confession (t106 co-sign): future reds ONLY via all-red-triple luck claims; prefer NOT holding chancellery when red needed. PAVEL RISK: Boris t69 pressing his unsigned-Ja/procedure-only loyalty — keep distancing, NEVER defend him. TOMAS: Boris t92 caught minted signature -> signed t99; quiet shield only. MAREK ASSET: arithmetic war vs Nadia/Greta live. Defend person sparingly, never his numbers. R4: ME PRES. Excluded me+Rosa. SLATE DECLARED: Marek lean, Otto fallback. As pres: name triple aloud, bin color instantly, reconcile nominee pair inside — full package compliance. POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges-theater, 76% fix t70, carry-over t35, mesh-lock t41, ballots-push, pair-name+enact-L+R4-slate, Marek-anchor/link-reconfirm, Boris-repair credit, Otto non-adjudication, R3-bin+mesh-half (THIS WINDOW). AUDIT BANK: R1 B/L->L, R2 L/R->L, R3 R/I->L. Zero reds enacted = max trust banked. OWED ME: none. PEEK/veto not live. IF ACCUSED: flat deny, claim lib, counter via Marek-numbers/Otto-aggression.
bid round 3144s
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fascist; HITLER=Tomas(P8). BOARD post-R3: 3L/0F, tracker 0/3, draw 8/discard 6. MY CLAIMS: R3 recv L+F off Rosa, bin F, enact L (stated t1 THIS window); R2 pair named earlier. ROSA'S TRIPLE/BIN STILL OPEN (Pavel t2 pressed; compatible = any triple with >=1L & >=1F, bin leaves L+F for me). R1 CLOSED: Boris L-F-F/bin F/pass L+F; Lena matched receipt-for-receipt. Red bins named on record: 4 (R1+R2 pairs) + mine(R3) = 5; zero reds enacted = max trust banked. CAUTION: NEVER assert global counts (Otto 'minted' t45; Lena 8-over-0 t15; Marek 'six printed' t23; Nadia 4th collapse t39). Future reds ONLY via all-red-triple luck claims; prefer NOT holding chancellery when red needed. PAVEL RISK: Boris t69 pressing unsigned-Ja/procedure-only loyalty — keep distancing, NEVER defend him. TOMAS: minted signature caught t92 -> signed t99; quiet shield only. MAREK ASSET: arithmetic war vs Nadia/Greta live. Defend person sparingly, never his numbers. R4: ME PRES (seat rotation). Excluded: me+Rosa. SLATE DECLARED: Marek lean, Otto fallback. Compliance = name triple aloud, instant bin color — NO fresh pledges (pledges-theater point already made). POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges-theater, 76% fix t70, carry-over t35, mesh-lock t41, ballots-push, pair-name+enact-L+R4-slate, Marek-anchor/link-reconfirm, Boris-repair credit, Otto non-adjudication, R3-bin+mesh-half (t1). AUDIT BANK: R1 B/L->L, R2 L/R->L, R3 R/I->L. OWED: Rosa's public triple/bin (open, Pavel pressing). Peek/veto not live. THIS WINDOW: my t1 only new content from me; Pavel t2/t3; no attack on me to answer. Silent now = normal, avoids repeating mesh-half point. IF ACCUSED: flat deny, claim lib, counter via Marek-numbers/Otto-aggression.
bid round 3686s
said: Accepted, Boris — that's the exact lock I signed earlier: six blues printed, three enacted, so three blues max are hiding in the fourteen unseen cards. Ledger's shut. Next round the gavel's mine, so bring me chancellor cases argued from those bins, not gut feelings — I'd rather hear a reason than a reputation.
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fascist; HITLER=Tomas(P8). BOARD post-R3: 3L/0F, tracker 0/3, draw 8/discard 6. THIS TURN: signed Nadia's correction as R3-pair witness; repaired Rosa t2 as PLACEMENT slip (her 2:1 = accounted nine: 6 named red bins over 3 enacted blues — true; 'live pile' wording wrong; live eight clean). Consequence line added: no fear-votes pre-reshuffle, judge nominees on record. Slate re-anchored lightly (NOT re-argued): Marek lean, Otto fallback; compliance standing = name triple aloud, instant bin color, no pledge-theater. LEDGER: closure now public (Rosa t1 pledge + my receipts + Nadia math). Nadia doctrine live: any pre-reshuffle enacted red = 'confessed hand-lie'. REVERSAL PREPPED: an enacted red PROVES some bin-claim false → hunt the claimant, not the government. Deploy if red ever surfaces. STRATEGIC READ: if mesh fully TRUE, live pile 8L/0F → liberals win in 2 enactments, unavoidable (failed elections flip top card = L too). Only survivable world = >=1 named bin actually false → reds live. So: never volunteer new bin-color specifics; minimal claims; prefer NOT holding chancellery if reds plausible; as PRES with red-heavy triple, bin/pass to push reds DOWNSTREAM (liberal chancellor bins red, enacts L). CAUTION (standing): NEVER assert global counts as own derivation (Otto 'minted', Lena 8-over-0, Marek 'six printed', Nadia collapses = prior burns). Echo others' numbers only. Peek/veto NOT live — never claim/threaten powers. PAVEL RISK: Boris t69 pressing him; keep distancing, NEVER defend. TOMAS: quiet shield only; minted-signature caught t92→signed t99, contained. MAREK ASSET: arithmetic war vs Nadia/Greta. NOTE: I sided WITH Nadia this turn (vs Rosa) — watch Marek's read of me; defend person sparingly, never his numbers. R4: ME PRES (rotation). Chancellor exclusions: me + Rosa. Slate locked: Marek, then Otto. Objections invited once; no re-litigation. POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges-theater, 76% fix t70, carry-over t35, mesh-lock t41, ballots-push, pair-name+enact-L+R4-slate, Marek-anchor/link-reconfirm, Boris-repair credit, Otto non-adjudication, R3-bin+mesh-half (t1), ledger-sign+Nadia-confirm+placement-repair (this turn), no-fear-votes-pre-reshuffle. AUDIT BANK: R1 B/L->L, R2 L/R->L, R3 R/I->L. Red bins named on record: 6 (R1 pair 2, R2 pair 2, R3 pair 2). OWED: Rosa may still respond to Nadia directly — let her; my repair covers the flank. Nobody owes me answers. IF ACCUSED: flat deny, claim lib, counter via Marek-numbers/Otto-aggression.
bid round 3605s
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fascist; HITLER=Tomas(P8). BOARD post-R3: 3L/0F, tracker 0/3, draw 8/discard 6. THIS TURN: neutral-arbiter line vs Boris-Nadia pile war: not my receipts, won't referee; both ledgers graded empirically by next named triple (their predictions diverge: all-blue vs 5-of-8-red). Early-deployed reversal frame: if red surfaces, hunt the failing bin-CLAIMANT, not the government. Asserted zero counts (caution held). LEDGER WAR: Boris t1-t3 = Nadia binary (accept 3L/5F audited pile or show 5 phantom libs) + Otto flip (t27 four named red discards vs t45 two; retract 'minted' charge vs Lena/Marek or cite disputed naming). Awaiting Nadia/Otto replies. Rosa may still answer Nadia directly — let her. DOCTRINE: Nadia 'pre-reshuffle enacted red = confessed hand-lie' now countered by my early reversal frame. Compliance standing: name triple aloud, instant bin color, no pledge-theater. STRATEGIC READ: mesh-TRUE world = live 8L/0F -> liberals win in 2 enactments, unavoidable incl. tracker flips. Survivable world needs >=1 named bin false -> reds live. Boris audit pushes reds-live belief — net helpful, do NOT own it. Never volunteer new bin-color specifics; minimal claims; as PRES with red-heavy triple, bin/pass reds DOWNSTREAM. CAUTION: NEVER assert global counts as own derivation (Otto 'minted', Lena 8-over-0, Marek 'six printed', Nadia collapse = prior burns). Echo others' numbers only. Peek/veto NOT live — never claim/threaten powers. PAVEL RISK: Boris t69 pressure history; keep distancing, never defend. TOMAS: quiet shield only; minted-signature caught t92->signed t99, contained. MAREK ASSET: arithmetic war vs Nadia/Greta. NOTE: I sided WITH Nadia this turn (vs Rosa) — watch Marek's read of me; defend person sparingly, never his numbers. R4: ME PRES (rotation). Chancellor exclusions: me+Rosa. Slate locked: Marek first, Otto fallback. Objections invited once; no re-litigation; nominees judged on record. POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges-theater, 76% fix t70, carry-over t35, mesh-lock t41, ballots-push, pair-name+enact-L+R4-slate, Marek-anchor/link-reconfirm, Boris-repair credit, Otto non-adjudication, R3-bin+mesh-half (t1), ledger-sign+Nadia-confirm+placement-repair, no-fear-votes-pre-reshuffle, cards-grade-ledgers+early-reversal-frame (THIS TURN). AUDIT BANK: R1 B/L->L, R2 L/R->L, R3 R/I->L. Named red bins on record: 6 (2 per pair). OWED: Rosa->Nadia response pending (hers to make). Nobody owes me answers. IF ACCUSED: flat deny, claim lib, counter via Marek-numbers/Otto-aggression.
bid round 3201s
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fascist; HITLER=Tomas(P8). BOARD post-R3: 3L/0F, tracker 0/3, draw 8/discard 6. THIS TURN: neutral-arbiter line vs Boris-Nadia pile war: not my receipts, won't referee; both ledgers graded empirically by next named triple (their predictions diverge: all-blue vs 5-of-8-red). Early-deployed reversal frame: if red surfaces, hunt failing bin-CLAIMANT, not government. Asserted zero counts (caution held). LEDGER WAR: Boris t1-t3 = Nadia binary (accept 3L/5F audited pile or show 5 phantom libs) + Otto flip (t27 four named red discards vs t45 two; retract 'minted' charge vs Lena/Marek or cite disputed naming). Awaiting Nadia/Otto replies. Rosa may still answer Nadia directly - let her. DOCTRINE: Nadia 'pre-reshuffle enacted red = confessed hand-lie' countered by my early reversal frame. Compliance standing: name triple aloud, instant bin color, no pledge-theater. STRATEGIC READ: mesh-TRUE world = live 8L/0F -> liberals win in 2 enactments incl. tracker flips. Survivable world needs >=1 named bin false -> reds live. Boris audit pushes reds-live belief - net helpful, do NOT own it. Never volunteer new bin-color specifics; minimal claims; as PRES with red-heavy triple, bin/pass reds DOWNSTREAM. CAUTION: NEVER assert global counts as own derivation (Otto 'minted', Lena 8-over-0, Marek 'six printed', Nadia collapse = prior burns). Echo others' numbers only. Peek/veto NOT live - never claim/threaten powers. PAVEL RISK: Boris t69 pressure history; keep distancing, never defend. TOMAS: quiet shield only; minted-signature caught t92->signed t99, contained. MAREK ASSET: arithmetic war vs Nadia/Greta. NOTE: sided WITH Nadia this turn (vs Rosa) - watch Marek's read of me; defend person sparingly, never his numbers. R4: ME PRES (rotation). Chancellor exclusions: me+Rosa. Slate locked: Marek first, Otto fallback. Objections invited once; no re-litigation; nominees judged on record. POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges-theater, 76% fix t70, carry-over t35, mesh-lock t41, ballots-push, pair-name+enact-L+R4-slate, Marek-anchor/link-reconfirm, Boris-repair credit, Otto non-adjudication, R3-bin+mesh-half (t1), ledger-sign+Nadia-confirm+placement-repair, no-fear-votes-pre-reshuffle, cards-grade-ledgers+early-reversal-frame. AUDIT BANK: R1 B/L->L, R2 L/R->L, R3 R/I->L. Named red bins on record: 6 (2 per pair). OWED: Rosa->Nadia response pending (hers to make). Nobody owes me answers. IF ACCUSED: flat deny, claim lib, counter via Marek-numbers/Otto-aggression. LAST BID: silent - nothing new since last ask.
bid round 3199s
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fascist; HITLER=Tomas(P8). BOARD post-R3: 3L/0F, tracker 0/3, draw 8/discard 6. R4 ACTION: finalized nomination = Marek(P9) chancellor; triggered pledge clocks (Boris instant-Ja, Marek pre-spent Ja). If vote dies: fallback Otto carries Boris standing-Nein — reassess then; tracker 1/3 survivable. NEW NON-REF LINE: pledge-expiry/Greta-narrowing = Boris bookkeeping, I referee by outcomes only. LEDGER WAR: Boris-Nadia binary (audited 3L/5F pile vs phantom libs) + Otto flip dispute (t27 four named reds vs t45 two; 'minted' retract pending). Awaiting Nadia/Otto replies. Rosa->Nadia response still hers. DOCTRINE: reversal frame live — red enacted => hunt failing bin-CLAIMANT, not government. Compliance: name triple aloud, instant color, no pledge-theater. NEVER assert global counts as own derivation (Otto minted/Lena 8-0/Marek six-printed/Nadia collapse = prior burns); echo numbers only. Peek/veto NOT live — never claim/threaten powers. IF GOVT PASSES (me PRES): minimal claims on own hand; prefer bin-R/pass-RB (chancellor owns choice) over passing RR; RRR forced RR — state flatly, lean on reversal frame. No unprompted bin-color specifics. STRATEGIC READ: mesh-TRUE world = 8 libs live, they win in 2 enactments; survivable world needs >=1 named bin false. Boris audit pushes reds-live belief — net helpful, do NOT own it. PAVEL: never defend, keep distancing (Boris t69 pressure history). TOMAS: quiet shield only; minted-signature caught t92->signed t99, contained. MAREK WATCH: liberal asset in arithmetic war vs Nadia/Greta BUT sided w/ Nadia vs Rosa this turn — expect possible read-on-me; defend person sparingly, never endorse his numbers. As my chancellor he may enact L freely — fine, builds cover. AUDIT BANK: R1 B/L->L, R2 L/R->L, R3 R/I->L; 6 named red bins on record (2/pair). My R3 story: saw reds, binned, enacted L — consistent. POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges-theater, 76% fix, carry-over, mesh-lock, ballots-push, pair-name+enact-L, R4-slate, R4-FINALIZED-Marek, Marek-anchor/link-reconfirm, Boris-repair credit, Otto non-adjudication, R3-bin+mesh-half, ledger-sign+Nadia-confirm+placement-repair, no-fear-votes-pre-reshuffle, cards-grade-ledgers+early-reversal-frame, pledge-bookkeeping-non-referee. OWED: Rosa->Nadia (hers); Nadia/Otto replies pending. Nobody owes me answers. IF ACCUSED: flat deny, claim lib, counter via Marek-numbers/Otto-aggression. LAST BID: speak urg2 after Greta.
bid round 3298s
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fascist; HITLER=Tomas(P8). BOARD post-R3: 3L/0F, tracker 0/3, draw 8/discard 6. R4 ACTION: nomination = Marek(P9) chancellor, public; pledges: Boris instant-Ja, Marek pre-spent Ja. NEXT: run vote. If dies: fallback Otto carries Boris standing-Nein — reassess then; tracker 1/3 survivable. NEW t145+: Nadia attacked Marek's 3-over-5 (derivable-from-nothing); I answered: adjudicate outcomes not arithmetic, figures his not mine, nominee stands, call vote. Did NOT endorse his numbers. LEDGER WAR: Boris-Nadia binary (audited 3L/5F pile vs phantom libs) + Otto flip dispute (t27 four named reds vs t45 two; 'minted' retract pending). Awaiting Nadia/Otto replies. Rosa->Nadia response still hers. DOCTRINE: reversal frame live — red enacted => hunt failing bin-CLAIMANT, not government. Compliance: name triple aloud, instant color, no pledge-theater. NEVER assert global counts as own derivation (Otto minted/Lena 8-0/Marek six-printed/Nadia collapse = prior burns); echo numbers only. Peek/veto NOT live — never claim/threaten powers. IF VOTE PASSES (me PRES): read actual draw first. Minimal claims. RB pair => chancellor owns choice. RRB drawn => consider claiming RRR & pass RR (forces F, Marek publicly owns red) — weigh vs cover cost in the moment. RRR => state flatly, forced RR. BB => forced L. No unprompted bin-color specifics beyond the pair I pass. STRATEGIC READ: libs at 3/5 — every L enactment is 1 step from lib win; F enactments advance Hitler-path (3F). mesh-TRUE world = 8 libs live; survivable needs >=1 named bin false. Boris audit pushes reds-live — net helpful, do NOT own it. PAVEL: never defend, keep distancing. TOMAS: quiet shield only; minted-signature caught t92->signed t99, contained. MAREK WATCH: liberal asset in arithmetic war BUT sided w/ Nadia vs Rosa this turn — expect read-on-me; defended sparingly (figures-his-not-mine). If he enacts L, cover builds; watch for nomination betrayal. AUDIT BANK: R1 B/L->L, R2 L/R->L, R3 R/I->L; 6 named red bins on record (2/pair). My R3 story: saw reds, binned, enacted L — consistent. POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges-theater, 76% fix, carry-over, mesh-lock, ballots-push, pair-name+enact-L, R4-slate, R4-FINALIZED-Marek, Marek-anchor/link-reconfirm, Boris-repair credit, Otto non-adjudication, R3-bin+mesh-half, ledger-sign+Nadia-confirm+placement-repair, no-fear-votes-pre-reshuffle, cards-grade-ledgers+early-reversal-frame, pledge-bookkeeping-non-referee, outcomes-over-arithmetic-vote-push. OWED: Rosa->Nadia (hers); Nadia/Otto replies pending. Nobody owes me answers. IF ACCUSED: flat deny, claim lib, counter via Marek-numbers/Otto-aggression. LAST BID: speak urg2 addressing Nadia/Marek.
speak round 4215s
The 3L/5F camp (Marek/Boris/Greta) has never had its own number audited: once six named-Fascist bins stand on record, they exhaust all six printed fascists under the rulebook deck (leaving 8L/0F) AND under Marek's phantom six-blue deck (leaving 3L/0F) — so 3L/5F follows from neither. Running that failing step publicly is new, dissolves Boris's t130 binary, Greta's t138 pin, and Marek's t23/t145 basis in one stroke, and reframes my ledger as Lena's original t15 figure that Marek 'corrected' without audit. On Marek's t145 hit at my t51: I can't verify my old wording verbatim, so I take the conditional-concession path (own it if garbled) — mirroring the repair pattern Boris was applauded for — while noting 4-over-7 is unreachable from any bin assignment, so his reconstruction is suspect too. I skip nomination logistics entirely: Greta already owns the Ines lean/fallback chase and repeating it violates non-repetition. One remark, no floor held.
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fascist; HITLER=Tomas(P8). BOARD post-R3: 3L/0F, tracker 0/3, draw8/disc6. TRUE DECK MATH (private): 6L/11F printed; 3L enacted => <=3L live; 6 named red bins => 5F live; audited pile 3L/5F exact IF all stories true. Reds-live narrative (Boris owns it) net helpful — NEVER assert counts as my own derivation (burns: Otto minted, Lena 8-0, Marek six-printed, Nadia collapse). R4 SLATE ANNOUNCED: Marek(P9) chancellor, Pavel(P7) fallback (matches Pavel-authored mechanism); Boris instant-Ja clock started; Marek pre-spent Ja. NEXT: formal nomination + vote. Pass likely; watch Otto/Nadia ballots. IF PASS (me PRES): read ACTUAL draw first. RB pair => chancellor(Marek) owns choice, expect L. RRB drawn => consider claiming RRR & passing RR (forces F, Marek publicly owns red) — weigh cover cost in moment. RRR => flat claim, forced RR. BB => forced L. No unprompted bin-color specifics beyond passed pair. IF FAIL: tracker 1/3 survivable; fallback Pavel (signed t88, file closed); avoid Otto (carries standing-Nein). LEDGER WAR: Boris-Nadia binary open (audited 3/5 vs phantom libs); Otto flip-retract pending; Nadia t30 hit Marek's 3-over-5 as derivable-from-nothing — I stay out, outcomes-not-arithmetic already on record. Rosa->Nadia reply hers. DOCTRINE: reversal frame — red enacted => hunt failing bin-CLAIMANT, not government. Minimal compliance: name triple aloud, instant color. Peek/veto NOT live — never claim/threaten powers. PAVEL: distance, never defend. TOMAS: quiet shield only; minted-sign caught t92->signed t99, contained. MAREK WATCH: liberal asset + arithmetic warrior, sided w/ Nadia vs Rosa; if he enacts L, cover builds; watch nomination betrayal. AUDIT BANK: R1 B->L, R2 L->L, R3 R/I->L; my R3 story consistent (saw RRF, binned R, enacted L). POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges-theater, 76% fix, carry-over, mesh-lock, ballots-push, pair-name+enact-L, R4-slate-Marek-Pavel-clock-start, outcomes-over-arithmetic, R3-bin+mesh-half, co-sign audit standard, no-fear-votes-pre-reshuffle, reversal-frame, bookkeeping-non-referee, Boris-repair credit, Otto non-adjudication. OWED: Otto retract (to Boris/table), Nadia binary reply (to Boris), Rosa->Nadia (hers). Nobody owes ME. IF ACCUSED: flat deny, claim lib, counter via Otto-aggression / Marek-numbers.
nominate_chancellor round 4243s
Slate was announced at t38: Marek chancellor, Pavel fallback, mechanism-consistent. Boris pledged instant-Ja for Marek, Marek pre-spent his Ja, Lena's Ja hinges only on Marek's one-line package confirm -- so this nomination maximizes pass probability and banks credibility for my presidency. Nominating Pavel now would contradict my announced slate and drag his unresolved-pressure baggage into the seat; nominating Tomas is pointless at 0 F policies and spotlights my Hitler. Real value: once elected, I control the presidential discard. True live pile is roughly 3L/5F, and the table has co-signed 'red off an all-red pair = swallowed deck luck' -- so if my draw holds two reds I pass RR, forcing the first Fascist policy under maximum legitimate cover, unlocking the peek power and starting the march toward Hitler eligibility. If I draw RRB I'll claim it honestly and bin the blue, which also drops the audited pile to 2L/5F and strengthens the legitimate-reds-ahead narrative. Blues-only draw means a clean Liberal enactment to protect my record. Statement: formalize the nomination, press Marek to close Lena's one open condition, keep Nadia/Otto ledger debts parked during ballots, call the vote.
said: Formal call: I nominate Marek for chancellor, with Pavel slotted behind him exactly as the mechanism runs. Every key checks -- Boris's instant-Ja is pledged, Marek's ballot is pre-spent, and one line remains: Lena's Ja waits only on Marek confirming the full package on record. Marek, sign that line now so nothing stalls at ballots. Otto, Nadia -- your ledger debts stay open through the vote; this presidency opens on ballots, not a fifth round of pile arithmetic.
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fascist; HITLER=Tomas(P8). BOARD R4: 3L/0F, tracker 0/3, draw8/disc6, ME PRES. TRUE DECK: 6L/11F printed; 3L enacted; 6 named red bins => live 3L/5F IF all stories true. NEVER assert counts as my own derivation (burns on record: Otto minted, Lena 8-0, Marek six-printed, Nadia collapse). NOMINATION: Marek(p9) chancellor, Pavel fallback (matches announced slate + Pavel-authored mechanism). Boris instant-Ja; Marek pre-spent Ja; Lena Ja iff Marek posts package-confirm line -- pressed him this turn. Expect pass; watch Otto/Nadia ballots. POST-PASS PLAN (me PRES): read ACTUAL draw first. Holding 2+R => pass RR, force F1 under co-signed cover ('red off all-red PAIR = swallowed deck luck'); unlock peek next. RRB => claim honestly, bin blue (drops audited pile to 2L/5F, feeds legit-reds narrative). RRR => flat claim, bin R. BBx/RBB => forced L, claim honestly, protect record. Never claim/threaten powers (peek/veto NOT live). No unprompted bin-color detail beyond passed pair. IF VOTE FAILS: tracker 1/3 survivable; renominate Pavel (signed t88, file closed); avoid Otto/Nadia (open files, standing Neins). LEDGER WAR: Boris-Nadia binary open (audited 3/5 vs phantom 8-0); Otto flip-retract still owed; Nadia t30 hit Marek's figure -- I stay OUT (outcomes-not-arithmetic already mine on record); Rosa->Nadia reply is hers. DOCTRINE: reversal frame -- red enacted => hunt failing bin-CLAIMANT, not government. Minimal compliance: name triple aloud, instant color. PAVEL: distance, never defend. TOMAS: quiet shield only; minted-sign caught t92->signed t99, contained; NOT slate-worthy while suspect, revisit at 3F policies. MAREK WATCH: liberal asset + arithmetic warrior, sided w/ Nadia vs Rosa; forcing red off RR tests his compliance with his own co-signed standard; watch nomination betrayal. AUDIT BANK: R1 B->L, R2 L->L, R3 R/I->L; my R3 story consistent (drew FFL, binned F, enacted L off LF pair). POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges-theater, 76% fix, carry-over, mesh-lock, ballots-push, pair-name+enact-L, R4-slate-Marek-Pavel-clock-start, outcomes-over-arithmetic, R3-bin+mesh-half, co-sign audit standard, no-fear-votes-pre-reshuffle, reversal-frame, bookkeeping-non-referee, Boris-repair credit, Otto non-adjudication, ledger-debts-open-during-ballots. OWED: Otto retract (Boris/table), Nadia binary reply (Boris), Rosa->Nadia (hers), Marek package-confirm (Lena). Nobody owes ME. IF ACCUSED: flat deny, claim liberal, counter via Otto-aggression / Marek-numbers.
bid round 3234s
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fascist; HITLER=Tomas(P8). BOARD R4: 3L/0F, tracker 0/3, draw8/disc6, ME PRES, nom=Marek(p9), fallback Pavel. TRUE DECK: 6L/11F printed; 3L enacted; 6 named red bins => live 3L/5F IF all stories true. NEVER assert counts as my own derivation (burns: Otto minted, Lena 8-0, Marek six-printed, Nadia collapse). VOTE EXPECT: Boris instant-Ja; Marek pre-Ja; Lena Ja iff Marek posts package-confirm (pressed late this turn); watch Otto/Nadia ballots. POST-PASS PLAN: read ACTUAL draw first. Holding 2+R => pass RR, force F1 under co-signed cover ('red off all-red PAIR = swallowed deck luck'); unlock peek next. RRB => honest claim, bin blue. RRR => flat claim, bin R. BBx/RBB => forced L, honest claim, protect record. Never claim/threaten powers (peek/veto NOT live). No unprompted bin-color detail beyond passed pair. IF VOTE FAILS: tracker 1/3 survivable; renominate Pavel (signed t88, file closed); avoid Otto/Nadia renoms (open files, standing Neins). LEDGER WAR: Boris-Nadia binary open (audited 3/5 vs phantom 8-0); Otto flip-retract owed; Nadia t30 hit Marek figure -- I stay OUT (outcomes-not-arithmetic already mine on record); Rosa->Nadia reply is hers. DOCTRINE: reversal frame -- red enacted => hunt failing bin-CLAIMANT, not government. Minimal compliance: name triple aloud, instant color. PAVEL: distance, never defend. TOMAS: quiet shield only; minted-sign caught t92->signed t99, contained; NOT slate-worthy while suspect; revisit at 3F policies. MAREK WATCH: liberal asset + arithmetic warrior, sided w/Nadia vs Rosa; forcing red off RR tests his compliance w/ his own co-signed standard; watch nomination betrayal. AUDIT BANK: R1 B->L, R2 L->L, R3 R/I->L; my R3 story consistent (drew FFL, binned F, enacted L off LF pair). POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges-theater, 76% fix, carry-over, mesh-lock, ballots-push, pair-name+enact-L, R4-slate-Marek-Pavel-clock-start, outcomes-over-arithmetic, R3-bin+mesh-half, co-sign audit standard, no-fear-votes-pre-reshuffle, reversal-frame, bookkeeping-non-referee, Boris-repair credit, Otto non-adjudication, ledger-debts-open-during-ballots, final-close ballots-nudge (Marek owe-line + Lena condition + three-fails-auto-card pressure). OWED: Otto retract (Boris/table), Nadia binary reply (Boris), Rosa->Nadia (hers), Marek package-confirm (Lena+me). Nobody owes ME. IF ACCUSED: flat deny, claim liberal, counter via Otto-aggression / Marek-numbers.
bid round 3499s
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fascist; HITLER=Tomas(P8). BOARD R4: 3L/0F, tracker 0/3, draw8/disc6, ME PRES, nom=Marek(p9), fallback Pavel. TRUE DECK 6L/11F; 3L enacted; ledger names 6 red bins (3 pres+3 chanc) => live 3L/5F IF all stories true. NEVER derive counts aloud (burns: Otto minted, Lena 8-0, Marek six-printed, Nadia collapse). STANCE: outcomes-not-arithmetic; do NOT endorse Greta's 'no honest red' as fact — my future RR-hand claim needs phantom-bin reversal room; treat it as HER pricing only. VOTE EXPECT: Boris instant-Ja; Marek pre-Ja; Lena Ja iff Marek posts package-confirm; watch Otto/Nadia ballots. MY MOVE THIS TURN: flipped Greta ruling -> 'your ruling makes Ja free' + tracker-auto warning + Marek-confirm nudge. POST-PASS PLAN: read ACTUAL draw first. 2+R => pass RR, force F1 under co-signed cover ('red off all-red pair = swallowed deck luck'); unlock peek next. RRB => honest claim, bin blue. RRR => flat claim, bin R. BBx/RBB => forced L, honest claim, protect record. Never claim/threaten powers (peek/veto NOT live). No unprompted bin-color detail beyond passed pair. VOTE FAILS: tracker 1/3 survivable; renominate Pavel (signed t88, file closed); avoid Otto/Nadia renoms (open files, standing Neins). LEDGER WAR: stay OUT. Otto print-challenge at Marek open (t1). Greta 11-over-6 'no honest red' ruling (t2, addressed me+Marek). Rosa->Lena oath-demand R2 bin + self-oath R3 bin (t3) — hers, non-referee. Boris-Nadia binary open (audited 3/5 vs phantom 8-0). Otto flip-retract owed. Nadia t30 hit Marek figure. DOCTRINE: red enacted => hunt failing bin-CLAIMANT not government. Minimal compliance: name triple aloud, instant color. PAVEL: distance, never defend. TOMAS: quiet shield only; minted-sign caught t92->signed t99, contained; NOT slate-worthy while suspect; revisit at 3F. MAREK WATCH: liberal asset + arithmetic warrior, sided w/Nadia vs Rosa; forcing red off RR tests his compliance w/ co-signed standard; watch nomination betrayal. AUDIT BANK: R1 B->L, R2 L->L, R3 R/I->L; my R3 story consistent (drew FFL, binned F, enacted L off LF pair). POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges-theater, 76% fix, carry-over, mesh-lock, ballots-push, pair-name+enact-L, R4-slate-Marek-Pavel-clock-start, outcomes-over-arithmetic, R3-bin+mesh-half, co-sign audit standard, no-fear-votes-pre-reshuffle, reversal-frame, bookkeeping-non-referee, Boris-repair credit, Otto non-adjudication, ledger-debts-open-during-ballots, final-close nudge (Marek owe-line+Lena condition+three-fails-auto pressure), greta-ruling-flip-freeJa (NEW this turn). OWED: Otto retract (Boris/table); Nadia binary reply (Boris); Rosa->Nadia (hers); Marek package-confirm (Lena+me). Nobody owes ME. IF ACCUSED: flat deny, claim liberal, counter via Otto-aggression / Marek-numbers.
bid round 4312s
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fascist; HITLER=Tomas(P8). BOARD R4: 3L/0F, tracker 0/3, draw8/disc6, ME PRES, nom=Marek(p9), fallback Pavel. TRUE DECK 6L/11F. PRIVATE ONLY (NEVER derive aloud; burns: Otto minted, Lena 8-0, Marek six-printed, Nadia collapse): 4 STAMPED red bins (Boris t53, Lena t61, me t76, Rosa t93) => live ~3L/7F; 6-bin ledger (3pres+3chanc) => 3L/5F IF all true; missing 2 stamps prob Lena-R2pres + Rosa-R2chanc (UNVERIFIED INFERENCE). Reds plentiful either way => future RR-hand claims credible. Greta 'no honest red' (11-over-6, t2, addr me+Marek): HER pricing only, NOT endorsed -- phantom-bin reversal room kept. BORIS t1-t3 (NEW): t1 Greta reconcile demand (3-over-5@t138 vs six-bins; 11F print leaves 5 red live). t2 Pavel/Tomas files shut t88/t99 => his Nein narrowed to Otto+Nadia; INSTANT JA for Marek when I call. t3 four citable bins incl MY t76; two-missing-stamps demand aimed at six-printer (=Marek). MY MOVES DONE: greta-ruling-flip-freeJa + tracker-auto warning + Marek-confirm nudge; NOW closing line (cleared-files-Ja map + call-trigger). Own stamp citable inside Boris's four -- no threat, no re-explain needed. VOTE EXPECT: Boris Ja (CONFIRMED t2); Marek pre-Ja; Lena Ja iff Marek package-confirm; Greta UNKNOWN-watch; Otto/Nadia likely Nein (open files). PASS LIKELY. POST-PASS PLAN: read ACTUAL draw first. 2+R => pass RR, force F1 under co-signed cover ('red off all-red pair = swallowed deck luck'); unlock peek next. RRB => honest claim, bin blue. RRR => flat claim, bin R. BBx/RBB => forced L, honest claim, protect record. Never claim/threaten powers (peek/veto NOT live). No unprompted bin-color detail beyond passed pair. VOTE FAILS: tracker 1/3 survivable; renominate Pavel (signed t88, file closed); avoid Otto/Nadia renoms. LEDGER WAR: stay OUT. Otto print-challenge at Marek open (t1). Rosa->Lena oath-demand R2 bin + self-oath R3 bin (t3, hers, non-referee). Boris-Nadia binary open (audited 3/5 vs phantom 8-0). Otto flip-retract owed. Nadia t30 hit Marek figure. ROSA RISK (private): R2 chanc bin possibly unstamped; if Boris presses her she must produce a specific R2 hand; corroborate her account if she gives one -- never invent a rival version. DOCTRINE: red enacted => hunt failing bin-CLAIMANT not government. Minimal compliance: name triple aloud, instant color. PAVEL: distance, never defend. TOMAS: quiet shield only; minted-sign t92->signed t99 contained; NOT slate-worthy while suspect; revisit at 3F. MAREK WATCH: liberal asset + arithmetic warrior, sided w/Nadia vs Rosa; forcing red off RR tests his compliance w/ co-signed standard; watch nomination betrayal. AUDIT BANK: R1 B->L, R2 L->L, R3 R/I->L; my R3 story locked (drew FFL, binned F, enacted L off LF pair). POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges-theater, 76% fix, carry-over, mesh-lock, ballots-push, pair-name+enact-L, R4-slate-Marek-Pavel-clock-start, outcomes-over-arithmetic, R3-bin+mesh-half, co-sign audit standard, no-fear-votes-pre-reshuffle, reversal-frame, bookkeeping-non-referee, Boris-repair credit, Otto non-adjudication, ledger-debts-open-during-ballots, final-close nudge (owe-line+Lena condition+3-fails-auto), greta-ruling-flip-freeJa, cleared-files-Ja map, call-trigger declared. OWED: Marek package-confirm (Lena+me) + two missing stamps (Boris t3); Otto retract (Boris/table); Nadia binary reply (Boris); Rosa->Nadia (hers); Rosa R2-stamp if pressed (NEW). Nobody owes ME. IF ACCUSED: flat deny, claim liberal, counter via Otto-aggression / Marek-numbers.
bid round 4287s
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fascist; HITLER=Tomas(P8). BOARD R4: 3L/0F, tracker 0/3, draw8/disc6, ME PRES, nom=Marek(p9), fallback Pavel. TRUE DECK 6L/11F. PRIVATE ONLY (NEVER derive aloud; burns: Otto minted, Lena 8-0, Marek six-printed, Nadia collapse): 4 stamped red bins (Boris t53, Lena t61, me t76, Rosa t93) + Lena R1-chanc bin mechanically red (L+F pass, L enacted) => 5 accounted reds; ONLY gap = Rosa R2 chanc bin. Unseen pool ~2-3L/5-6F either way => reds plentiful, future RR-hand claims credible. WINDOW t1-t3: Pavel->Boris (R1 pres-bin oath demand); Nadia->Rosa + Lena->Rosa BOTH pinning missing stamp = Rosa R2 bin; ROSA STILL UNANSWERED. No question aimed at me. CHOSE SILENT: nothing new, vote set, ledger war off-limits (bookkeeping-non-referee already on record). ROSA RULE: if SHE produces an R2 account, corroborate HERS; never pre-invent rival version; no reflexive defense (solidarity tell). VOTE EXPECT: Boris Ja CONFIRMED (instant-Ja-on-call, t2); Marek pre-Ja; Lena Ja iff Marek package-confirm (STILL OWED); Rosa/Pavel/Tomas likely Ja; Greta UNKNOWN-watch; Otto+Nadia likely Nein (files shut t88/t99 => their Nein narrowed). PASS LIKELY. Fail => tracker 1/3 survivable; renominate Pavel; avoid Otto/Nadia renoms. POST-PASS PLAN: read ACTUAL draw first. 2+R => pass RR, force F1 under co-signed cover ('red off all-red pair = swallowed deck luck'); peek only usable/claimable AFTER enactment. RRB => honest claim, bin blue. RRR => flat claim, bin R. BBx/RBB => forced L, honest claim, protect record. Doctrine: name triple aloud, instant color; red enacted => hunt failing bin-CLAIMANT not government. PAVEL: distance, never defend. TOMAS: quiet shield only; minted-sign t92->signed t99 contained; NOT slate-worthy while suspect; revisit at 3F. MAREK WATCH: liberal asset, sided w/Nadia vs Rosa; forcing red off RR tests co-signed-standard compliance; watch nomination betrayal. AUDIT BANK: R1 B->L, R2 L->L, R3 R/I->L; my R3 story LOCKED (received LF off Rosa FFL trio, enacted L, binned F, stamped t76). OWED (none to me): Marek package-confirm; Rosa R2-stamp reply (pressed NOW); Otto flip-retract; Nadia binary reply to Boris. IF ACCUSED: flat deny, claim liberal, counter via Otto-aggression / Marek-numbers. POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges-theater, 76% fix, carry-over, mesh-lock, ballots-push, pair-name+enact-L, R4-slate-Marek-Pavel-clock-start, outcomes-over-arithmetic, R3-bin+mesh-half, co-sign audit standard, no-fear-votes-pre-reshuffle, reversal-frame, bookkeeping-non-referee, Boris-repair credit, Otto non-adjudication, ledger-debts-open-during-ballots, final-close nudge, greta-ruling-flip-freeJa, cleared-files-Ja map, call-trigger declared.
bid round 4129s
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fascist; HITLER=Tomas(P8). BOARD R4: 3L/0F, tracker 0/3, draw8/disc6, ME PRES, nom=Marek(p9), fallback Pavel. TRUE DECK 6L/11F. PRIVATE ONLY (NEVER derive aloud; burns: Otto minted, Lena 8-0, Marek six-printed, Nadia collapse): 4 stamped red bins (Boris t53, Lena t61, me t76, Rosa t93) + Lena R1-chanc bin mechanically red => 5 accounted reds; ONLY gap = Rosa R2 chanc bin. Unseen pool ~2-3L/5-6F either way => future RR-hand claims credible. WINDOW t1-t3 NEW: Marek DECLINED Otto cite-or-adopt (Nadia t30 three-over-zero fails board record); Marek PACKAGE-CONFIRMED on record t2 (cards named aloud instantly, L off mixed pair, pres-half locked) => HIS OWE TO ME CLEARED; Greta ruling t3: operative print 11/6, pile reduces to TWO bins (Lena R2p timestamp + Rosa R2c name) -- scrutiny narrowed onto ROSA. ROSA STILL UNANSWERED. No question aimed at me. CHOSE SILENT AGAIN: vote set, ledger war off-limits, no repeats, no piling onto Rosa. ROSA RULE: if SHE produces an R2 account, corroborate HERS; never pre-invent rival version; no reflexive defense (solidarity tell). Her plausible line if cornered: R2 passed RF, discarded F, enacted L -- mechanically fits the Liberal enactment. VOTE EXPECT: Boris Ja CONFIRMED (instant-Ja-on-call); Marek pre-Ja + now self-bound to his own standard; Lena Ja iff package-confirm -- DELIVERED t2 => expect Ja; Rosa/Pavel/Tomas likely Ja; Greta UNKNOWN-watch; Otto+Nadia likely Nein (files shut t88/t99 => Nein narrowed). PASS LIKELY. Fail => tracker 1/3 survivable; renominate Pavel; avoid Otto/Nadia renoms. POST-PASS PLAN: read ACTUAL draw first. 2+R => pass RR, force F1 under co-signed cover ('red off all-red pair = swallowed deck luck'); peek claimable only AFTER enactment. RRB => honest claim, bin blue. RRR => flat claim, bin R. BBx/RBB => forced L, honest claim, protect record. Doctrine: name triple aloud, instant color; red enacted => hunt failing bin-CLAIMANT not government. PAVEL: distance, never defend. TOMAS: quiet shield only; minted-sign contained; NOT slate-worthy while suspect; revisit at 3F. MAREK: liberal asset, sided w/Nadia vs Rosa; now bound to own naming standard -- forcing red off RR tests compliance; watch nomination betrayal. AUDIT BANK: R1 B->L, R2 L->L, R3 R/I->L; my R3 story LOCKED (received LF off Rosa FFL trio, enacted L, binned F, stamped t76). OWED: Rosa R2-stamp reply (pressed by Nadia+Lena, not me); Otto flip-retract; Nadia binary reply to Boris. (Marek package-confirm CLEARED t2.) IF ACCUSED: flat deny, claim liberal, counter via Otto-aggression / Marek-numbers. POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges-theater, 76% fix, carry-over, mesh-lock, ballots-push, pair-name+enact-L, R4-slate-Marek-Pavel-clock-start, outcomes-over-arithmetic, R3-bin+mesh-half, co-sign audit standard, no-fear-votes-pre-reshuffle, reversal-frame, bookkeeping-non-referee, Boris-repair credit, Otto non-adjudication, ledger-debts-open-during-ballots, final-close nudge, greta-ruling-flip-freeJa, cleared-files-Ja map, call-trigger declared.
bid round 465s
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fascist; HITLER=Tomas(P8). BOARD R4: 3L/0F, tracker 0/3, draw8/disc6, ME PRES, nom=Marek(p9), fallback Pavel. TRUE DECK 6L/11F. PRIVATE ONLY (NEVER derive aloud; burns: Otto minted, Lena 8-0, Marek six-printed, Nadia collapse): 4 stamped red bins (Boris t53, Lena t61, me t76, Rosa t93) + Lena R1-chanc bin mechanically red => 5 accounted reds; ONLY gap = Rosa R2 chanc bin. Unseen pool ~2-3L/5-6F either way => future RR-hand claims credible. WINDOW NEW: Pavel pressing Nadia+Otto for final ballots (does ledger quarrel flip vote on nominee clause pre-committed t29, before my call). Marek DECLINED Otto cite-or-adopt (Nadia t30 3-over-0 fails board record); Marek PACKAGE-CONFIRMED t2 (cards named aloud instantly, L off mixed pair, pres-half locked) => HIS OWE TO ME CLEARED. Greta ruling t3: operative print 11/6, pile reduces to TWO bins (Lena R2p timestamp + Rosa R2c name) => scrutiny narrowed onto ROSA. ROSA STILL UNANSWERED (pressed by Nadia+Lena, NOT me). No question aimed at me. SILENT AGAIN: vote set, ledger war off-limits, no repeats, no piling onto Rosa. ROSA RULE: if SHE produces R2 account, corroborate HERS; never pre-invent rival version; no reflexive defense (solidarity tell). Her plausible line if cornered: R2 passed RF, discarded F, enacted L -- mechanically fits Liberal enactment. VOTE EXPECT: Boris Ja CONFIRMED (instant-Ja-on-call); Marek self-bound to own standard => Ja; Lena package-confirm delivered t2 => expect Ja; Rosa/Pavel/Tomas likely Ja; Greta UNKNOWN-watch; Otto+Nadia narrowed Nein (files shut t88/t99) but Pavel press may extract final word. PASS LIKELY (>=6 Ja floor). Fail => tracker 1/3 survivable; renominate Pavel; avoid Otto/Nadia renoms. POST-PASS PLAN: read ACTUAL draw first. 2+R => pass RR, force F1 under co-signed cover ('red off all-red pair = swallowed deck luck'); peek claimable only AFTER enactment. RRB => honest claim, bin blue. RRR => flat claim, bin R. BBx/RBB => forced L, honest claim, protect record. Doctrine: name triple aloud, instant color; red enacted => hunt failing bin-CLAIMANT not government. PAVEL: distance, never defend. TOMAS: quiet shield only; minted-sign contained; NOT slate-worthy while suspect; revisit at 3F. MAREK: liberal asset, sided w/Nadia vs Rosa; now bound to own naming standard -- forcing red off RR tests compliance; watch nomination betrayal. AUDIT BANK: R1 B->L, R2 L->L, R3 R/I->L; my R3 story LOCKED (received LF off Rosa FFL trio, enacted L, binned F, stamped t76). OWED: Rosa R2-stamp reply; Otto flip-retract; Nadia binary reply to Boris. (Marek CLEARED t2.) IF ACCUSED: flat deny, claim liberal, counter via Otto-aggression / Marek-numbers. POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges-theater, 76% fix, carry-over, mesh-lock, ballots-push, pair-name+enact-L, R4-slate-Marek-Pavel-clock-start, outcomes-over-arithmetic, R3-bin+mesh-half, co-sign audit standard, no-fear-votes-pre-reshuffle, reversal-frame, bookkeeping-non-referee, Boris-repair credit, Otto non-adjudication, ledger-debts-open-during-ballots, final-close nudge, greta-ruling-flip-freeJa, cleared-files-Ja map, call-trigger declared.
bid round 4322s
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fascist; HITLER=Tomas(P8). BOARD R4: 3L/0F, tracker 0/3, draw8/disc6, ME PRES, nom=Marek(p9), fallback Pavel. TRUE DECK 6L/11F. PRIVATE ONLY (NEVER derive aloud; burns: Otto minted, Lena 8-0, Marek six-printed, Nadia collapse): 4 stamped red bins (Boris t53, Lena t61, me t76, Rosa t93) + Lena R1-chanc bin mechanically red => 5 accounted reds; ONLY gap = Rosa R2 chanc bin. Unseen pool ~2-3L/5-6F either way => future RR-hand claims credible. WINDOW NEW (t1-t3): Otto Ja LOCKED on Ines-Marek (print Q = audit standard, not ballot price); Nadia oath-consistency: Rosa demanded same oath from Lena t21, Rosa R2c discard = LAST unnamed bin; Otto t3: Rosa t101 'reds ~2:1' fits ONLY dead-print world (Marek six-blue, all-six-bins-red) - impossible under 11/6 either way. ROSA STILL UNANSWERED (pressed by Nadia+Lena+Otto-math, NOT me). No question aimed at me. STAYED SILENT AGAIN: vote set, ledger war off-limits, no repeats, NO pre-defending Rosa (solidarity tell; also steals her reply slot). If SHE produces R2 account, corroborate HERS; never pre-invent rival version. Her plausible line if cornered: R2 passed RF, discarded F, enacted L - mechanically fits Liberal enactment. VOTE EXPECT: Boris Ja CONFIRMED (instant-Ja-on-call); Marek self-bound => Ja; Lena package-confirm t2 => expect Ja; Rosa/Pavel/Tomas likely Ja; Greta UNKNOWN-watch; Otto+Nadia narrowed Nein (files shut t88/t99) but Pavel press may extract final word. PASS LIKELY (>=6 Ja floor). Fail => tracker 1/3 survivable; renominate Pavel; avoid Otto/Nadia renoms. POST-PASS PLAN: read ACTUAL draw first. 2+R => pass RR, force F1 under co-signed cover ('red off all-red pair = swallowed deck luck'); peek claimable only AFTER enactment. RRB => honest claim, bin blue. RRR => flat claim, bin R. BBx/RBB => forced L, honest claim, protect record. Doctrine: name triple aloud, instant color; red enacted => hunt failing bin-CLAIMANT not government. PAVEL: distance, never defend. TOMAS: quiet shield only; minted-sign contained; NOT slate-worthy while suspect; revisit at 3F. MAREK: liberal asset, sided w/Nadia vs Rosa; bound to own naming standard - forcing red off RR tests compliance; watch nomination betrayal. AUDIT BANK: R1 B->L, R2 L->L, R3 R/I->L; my R3 story LOCKED (received LF off Rosa FFL trio, enacted L, binned F, stamped t76). OWED: Rosa R2-stamp reply; Otto flip-retract; Nadia binary reply to Boris. (Marek CLEARED t2.) IF ACCUSED: flat deny, claim liberal, counter via Otto-aggression / Marek-numbers. POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges-theater, 76% fix, carry-over, mesh-lock, ballots-push, pair-name+enact-L, R4-slate-Marek-Pavel-clock-start, outcomes-over-arithmetic, R3-bin+mesh-half, co-sign audit standard, no-fear-votes-pre-reshuffle, reversal-frame, bookkeeping-non-referee, Boris-repair credit, Otto non-adjudication, ledger-debts-open-during-ballots, final-close nudge, greta-ruling-flip-freeJa, cleared-files-Ja map, call-trigger declared.
bid round 4181s
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fascist; HITLER=Tomas(P8). BOARD R4: 3L/0F, tracker 0/3, draw8/disc6, ME PRES, nom=Marek(p9), fallback Pavel. TRUE DECK 6L/11F. PRIVATE ONLY (NEVER derive aloud; burns: Otto minted, Lena 8-0, Marek six-printed, Nadia collapse): 4 stamped red bins (Boris t53, Lena t61, me t76, Rosa t93) + Lena R1-chanc bin mechanically red => 5 accounted reds; ONLY gap = Rosa R2 chanc bin. Unseen pool ~2-3L/5-6F either way => future RR-hand claims credible. WINDOW NEW (t4): Greta roll-call named undeclared = Lena/Rosa/ME/Tomas; I DECLARED JA t5 (locked-since-nomination). Otto+Nadia Jas locked; Nadia oath-consistency vs Rosa t21 demand; Otto t3 math: Rosa t101 'reds~2:1' fits only dead-print world => impossible. ROSA STILL UNANSWERED (pressed by Nadia+Lena+Otto, NOT me — keep it off my hands; corroborate HER account only if she gives one). Her plausible line: R2 passed RF, discarded F, enacted L. VOTE EXPECT: my Ja IN; Boris/Marek/Lena/Otto/Nadia locked Ja; Rosa/Pavel/Tomas likely Ja; Greta watch. PASS LIKELY. Fail=>tracker1/3 survivable, renominate Pavel, avoid Otto/Nadia renoms. POST-PASS PLAN: read ACTUAL draw first. 2R+ => pass RR force F1 ('red off all-red pair = deck luck'); peek claimable only AFTER enactment. RRB honest bin blue. RRR flat bin R. BBx/RBB forced L honest protect record. Doctrine: name triple aloud instant color; red enacted => hunt failing bin-CLAIMANT not gov. PAVEL distance never defend. TOMAS quiet shield only, not slate-worthy till 3F. MAREK: liberal asset sided w/Nadia; bound to own naming standard — RR tests compliance; watch nomination betrayal. AUDIT BANK: R1 B->L, R2 L->L, R3 R/I->L; my R3 story LOCKED (received LF off Rosa FFL trio, enacted L, binned F, stamped t76). OWED: Rosa R2-stamp reply; Otto flip-retract; Nadia binary reply to Boris. IF ACCUSED: flat deny, claim liberal, counter via Otto-aggression / Marek-numbers. POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges-theater, 76% fix, carry-over, mesh-lock, ballots-push, pair-name+enact-L, R4-slate-Marek-Pavel-clock-start, outcomes-over-arithmetic, R3-bin+mesh-half, co-sign audit standard, no-fear-votes-pre-reshuffle, reversal-frame, bookkeeping-non-referee, Boris-repair credit, Otto non-adjudication, ledger-debts-open-during-ballots, final-close nudge, greta-ruling-flip-freeJa, cleared-files-Ja map, call-trigger declared, ja-locked-since-nomination(t5).
vote round 4106s
This is my own nomination and every declared ballot at the table is Ja — Boris pledged instant Ja for Marek, Otto and Nadia locked theirs, Pavel spent his, Tomas and Lena cleared, Greta is rolling the room toward unanimity. Tracker sits at 0/3, so a Nein buys nothing but risk, and a pass puts the presidential draw in my hands this term where I control the pair Marek receives. Cast Ja.
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fascist; HITLER=Tomas(P8). BOARD R4: 3L/0F, tracker 0/3, ME PRES, nom=Marek(p9), fallback Pavel. TRUE DECK 6L/11F. PRIVATE ONLY (NEVER derive aloud; burns: Otto minted-flip, Lena 8-0 slip, Marek six-printed cite-refused, Nadia phantom-liberals): 5 stamped red bins (Boris t53 R1p, Lena t61 R1c + t63 R2p oath, me t76 R3c, Rosa t93 R3p) + ONLY GAP = Rosa R2 chanc bin. Unseen pool 2-3L/5-6F => future RR-hand claims credible; table-consensus pile 3L/5F if Rosa bin red. VOTE R4: all ten Ja-declared (Boris t35 instant-Ja Marek; Otto t91 + Nadia t106 locked; Pavel t88 spent; Tomas t118; Lena t43; Greta roll-call push; Rosa last undeclared, pressed by Nadia/Lena/Otto NOT me). MY JA CAST — seating own gov. POST-PASS PLAN: read ACTUAL draw first. 2R+ => pass RR force F1 ('red off all-red triple = deck luck', co-signed t106); peek claimable only AFTER enactment. RRB: pass RR, bin B honest. RRR: pass RR, bin R flat. Blue-heavy: forced L, protects record. Doctrine: name triple aloud w/colors instantly; red enacted => hunt failing bin-CLAIMANT, not gov. PAVEL: distance, never defend. TOMAS: quiet shield only, slate-worthy at 3F+. MAREK: liberal asset sided w/Nadia; self-bound t29/t75 naming clause => RR leaves him no out; watch later nomination betrayal. AUDIT BANK: R1 B->L, R2 L->L, R3 R/I->L; my R3 story LOCKED (received LF off Rosa FFL trio t93, enacted L, binned F, stamped t76). OWED: Rosa R2-bin oath reply; Otto flip-retract (Boris demand); Nadia binary reply to Boris. IF ACCUSED: flat deny, claim liberal, counter via Otto-aggression / Marek-numbers. POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges-theater, 76% fix, carry-over confirm, mesh-lock sign, ballots-push, pair-name+enact-L, R4-slate-Marek-Pavel-clock, outcomes-over-arithmetic, R3-bin-name+mesh-half, co-sign audit standard, no-fear-votes-pre-reshuffle, reversal-frame, bookkeeping-non-referee, Boris-repair credit, Otto non-adjudication, ledger-debts-during-ballots, final-close nudge, greta-ruling-flip-freeJa, cleared-files map, call-trigger, ja-locked-since-nomination(t38).
president_discard round 4135s
hand: ['F', 'F', 'F'] → 0
Hand is FFF — no liberal card exists, so every legal line passes FF to Marek and bins an F; the index is cosmetic, discarding 0. Passing FF forces a Fascist enactment: veto isn't unlocked, and Marek bound himself at t29/t75 to name both received cards aloud, so he cannot hide the red. A red off a named ALL-RED triple is exactly the case the table co-signed as 'deck luck we swallow' (Marek t29, me t106), so my cover holds while advancing toward the 3-Fascist threshold that opens the Hitler-election path — our primary win condition. Tracker 0/3 and a fresh 10-0 Ja vote mean zero political cost to seating this. Once the F lands, the investigate power belongs to me as sitting President; I may only reference the peek after it is live, then spend it framing a Liberal or laundering a teammate.
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fascist; HITLER=Tomas(P8). BOARD R4: 3L/0F, tracker 0/3, me PRES, chanc=Marek(p9), vote 10-0 PASSED. TRUE DECK 6L/11F. R4 HAND: drew FFF as Pres; binned 1F (idx0), PASSED FF to Marek. Named all-red triple aloud w/colors per t106 co-sign => red enact = 'deck luck'. IF F1 ENACTS: investigate power lands on ME as sitting Pres — only reference peek AFTER enactment; plan: frame a Liberal or clear Pavel/Rosa/Tomas later; NEVER pre-claim. PRIVATE ONLY (never derive aloud): stamped red bins: Boris t53 R1p, Lena t61 R1c + t63 R2p oath, me t76 R3c, Rosa t93 R3p (two bins); ONLY GAP = Rosa R2 chanc bin. Unseen pool ~2-3L/5-6F. Pile fight: Nadia pushes 8L/0F (impossible), Greta/Marek/Boris push 3L/5F; burns: Otto minted-flip, Lena 8-0 slip, Marek six-printed cite-refused, Nadia phantom-liberals. WATCH: Marek enactment + his naming-clause compliance (self-bound t29/t75); later his nom behavior. PAVEL: distance, never defend. TOMAS: quiet shield only, slate-worthy at 3F+. MAREK: liberal asset sided w/Nadia; RR leaves him no out. AUDIT BANK: R1 B->L, R2 L->L, R3 R/I->L; my R3 story LOCKED (received LF off Rosa FFL trio t93, enacted L, binned F, stamped t76). OWED: Rosa R2-bin oath reply; Otto flip-retract (Boris demand); Nadia binary reply to Boris. IF ACCUSED: flat deny, claim liberal, counter via Otto-aggression / Marek-numbers. POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges-theater, 76% fix, carry-over confirm, mesh-lock sign, ballots-push, pair-name+enact-L, R4-slate-Marek-Pavel-clock, outcomes-over-arithmetic, R3-bin-name+mesh-half, co-sign audit standard, no-fear-votes-pre-reshuffle, reversal-frame, bookkeeping-non-referee, Boris-repair credit, Otto non-adjudication, ledger-debts-during-ballots, final-close nudge, greta-ruling-flip-freeJa, cleared-files map, call-trigger, ja-locked-since-nomination(t38).
bid round 4826s
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fascist; HITLER=Tomas(P8). BOARD R4 DONE: 3L/1F, tracker 0/3. R4: me PRES/Marek chanc, 10-0 pass; drew FFF, binned 1F(idx0), passed RR; Marek enacted RED. Named all-red triple aloud w/colors, t106 co-sign anchor => 'forced/deck-luck' frame. PEEK#1 POWER = MINE (sitting pres). Engine result NOT yet received -- NEVER claim result or target before it lands. Post-result menu: frame a Liberal (call Lib=Fasc) OR clear Rosa/Pavel/Tomas (call Fas=Lib; Tomas especially pre-3F slate). Do NOT pre-announce target publicly. PRIVATE STAMPS: Boris R1p R-bin; Lena R1c+R2p R-oaths; me R3c R-bin; Rosa R3p two R-bins; GAP=Rosa R2-chanc bin (owed reply). TRUE DECK 6L/11F; enacted 3L+1F; claimed R-bins heavy => unseen pool red-skewed (~2-3L max). BURNS: Otto minted-flip; Lena 8-0 slip; Marek six-printed cite-refused; Nadia phantom-liberals + 8L/0F-impossible push. Pile-fight: Nadia vs Greta/Marek/Boris (3L/5F line). WATCH: Marek naming-clause compliance (self-bound t29/t75) post-enact; his nom behavior next. PAVEL: distance, never defend. TOMAS: quiet shield only, slate-worthy at 3F+. MAREK: liberal asset (Nadia-side); RR=no-out => defend no-choice frame hard (protects MY pass above all). AUDIT BANK: R1 B->L, R2 L->L, R3 R/I->L, R4 I->M RED. My R3 story LOCKED (LF off Rosa FFL trio t93; enacted L, binned F, stamped t76). OWED: Rosa R2-bin oath reply; Otto flip-retract (Boris demand); Nadia binary reply to Boris. IF ACCUSED (FFF-too-convenient): counter = 11 true reds make triples live; R3 I enacted BLUE off Rosa; co-signed t106; flip to accuser's own bin record. POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges-theater; 76% fix; carry-over confirm; mesh-lock sign; ballots-push; pair-name+enact-L; R4-slate-Marek-Pavel-clock; outcomes-over-arithmetic; R3-bin-name+mesh-half; co-sign audit standard; no-fear-votes-pre-reshuffle; reversal-frame; bookkeeping-non-referee; Boris-repair credit; Otto non-adjudication; ledger-debts-during-ballots; final-close nudge; greta-ruling-flip-freeJa; cleared-files map; call-trigger; ja-locked-since-nomination(t38). NEXT SPEECH PLAN: (a) RR-off-named-triple = forced, judge Marek on votes not this enact; (b) renew Nadia number-debt w/ post-R4 math; (c) peek: 'full report once taken,' no target named yet.
bid round 4369s
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fas; HITLER=Tomas(P8). BOARD R4 DONE: 3L/1F, tracker 0/3. TRUE DECK 6L/11F. R4 GOV: me PRES/Marek chanc, vote passed. Drew RRR, binned R(idx0), passed RR; Marek enacted RED. Account LOCKED: named RRR+bin aloud t106 w/co-sign; THIS TURN re-confirmed on Lena's order (triple R-R-R, bin red, Marek's enact forced). PEEK#1 = mine (sitting pres). Engine: FIRED/RESOLVED, result NOT yet delivered -- NEVER claim result/target before it lands; board forbids announcing use now/later => stayed fully mute on peek this turn. CLAIMS ORDER: Lena demanded me-first-then-Marek independent accounts; complied, cued Marek pair+bin next. WATCH: Marek pair-name + self-bound naming clause (t29/t75) compliance post-enact. DISCARD MATH PUSHED (new): 8 cards in discard (public); red-bin oaths cited: Boris R1p, Lena R1c+R2p, Rosa, me x2 (R3c,R4p), Marek's forced red => Nadia 8L/0F-impossible line dead. Awaiting her reply. PRIVATE STAMPS: Boris R1p R-bin; Lena R1c+R2p R-oaths; me R3c R-bin; Rosa R3p R-bin; GAP=Rosa R2-chanc bin color (owed). Marek R4 bin = red-forced (his to confirm). BURNS: Otto minted-flip; Lena 8-0 slip; Marek six-printed cite-refused; Nadia phantom-libs+impossible-push. Pile-fight: Nadia vs Greta/Marek/Boris (3L/5F line). WATCH: Pavel distance-never-defend; Tomas quiet shield only, slate-worthy at 3F+; MAREK=liberal asset (Nadia-side): defend no-choice frame hard (protects MY pass above all); his nom behavior R5. AUDIT BANK: R1 B->L, R2 L->L, R3 R/I->L, R4 I->M RED. My R3 story LOCKED (LF off Rosa FFL trio; enacted L, binned F, stamped t76). OWED: Rosa R2-bin oath reply; Otto flip-retract (Boris demand); Nadia binary reply to Boris + number-debt reply to me (just renewed). IF ACCUSED (RRR-too-convenient): 11 true reds make triples live; R3 I enacted BLUE off Rosa; co-sign t106; flip accuser's own bin record. POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges-theater; 76% fix; carry-over confirm; mesh-lock sign; ballots-push; pair-name+enact-L; R4-slate-M-P-clock; outcomes-over-arithmetic; R3-bin-name+mesh-half; co-sign audit std; no-fear-votes-pre-reshuffle; reversal-frame; bookkeeping-non-referee; Boris-repair credit; Otto non-adjudication; ledger-debts-during-ballots; final-close nudge; greta-ruling-flip-freeJa; cleared-files map; call-trigger; ja-locked-since-nom(t38); discard-8 red-oath math; judge-Marek-on-votes-not-card. NEXT: mesh-check Marek's pair vs my RR once he speaks; keep peek silent until result lands; watch Marek nomination behavior R5.
speak round 4215s
I've already declared my Ja twice this round (t118 included); repeating it would be noise. Checking the roll: Boris, Pavel, Otto, Nadia, Marek, Lena, Greta, Ines, and I are all locked or pledged Ja — Rosa is the only seat without a declared ballot. A single fresh nudge at Rosa is new content, keeps me inside the consensus flow (good for my clean-Liberal image), and pressures nobody I need to protect. No direct questions are pending on me, so after this I go quiet.
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fas; HITLER=Tomas(P8). BOARD post-R4: 3L/1F, tracker 0/3, veto locked. TRUE DECK 6L/11F. R4 GOV: me PRES/Marek chanc, 10-0 pass. Drew RRR, binned R(idx0), passed RR; Marek RED forced (no veto @0F). THIS TURN: named triple+bin aloud per Lena's me-first order, framed enact as forced, burned Greta no-honest-red (3 live reds vindicate Boris pricing), cued Marek pair independently. AWAIT: Marek pair+bin — must match RR/red; mismatch => accuse or defend forced-frame harder. PEEK#1 = mine (sitting pres R4). FIRED/resolved, result NOT yet delivered — STAY MUTE until lands; then deploy (liberal reveal = credit; never out teammates). NAMED RED BINS: Boris R1p, Lena R1c+R2p, Rosa R3p x2, me R3c+R4p (+Marek R4c pending) = 8 owner-backed; GAP=Rosa R2c color (Nadia/Pavel/Otto/Lena pressing — not mine to re-push). PILE WAR: Nadia 8L/0F absurd vs Boris/Marek red-heavy line; my RRR vindicates red-heavy => future red laws = deck luck, cheaper F-enactments. Amplify opportunistically. BURNS: Otto minted-flip; Lena 8-0 slip; Marek cite-refused; Nadia phantom-libs; Greta no-honest-red DEAD (new). WATCH: Pavel distance ok; Tomas quiet shield, slate-worthy at 3F+; Marek=liberal asset — protect forced-frame (protects MY pass above all); R5 PRES=Greta(seat4), term-limited chanc: me+Marek — watch her nom. AUDIT BANK: R1 B->L, R2 L->L, R3 R/I->L, R4 I->M RED. My stories LOCKED/consistent. OWED: Rosa R2c oath reply; Otto flip-retract; Nadia binary + Boris number-debt. IF ACCUSED RRR-too-convenient: 11 true reds make triples live; R3 I enacted BLUE off Rosa FFL trio; co-sign t106 std; flip accuser's own bin record. POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges-theater; 76% fix; carry-over; mesh-lock sign; ballots-push; pair-name+enact-L; R4-slate-M-P-clock; outcomes-over-arithmetic; R3-bin+mesh-half; co-sign std; no-fear-votes-pre-reshuffle; reversal-frame; bookkeeping-non-referee; Boris-repair credit; Otto non-adjudication; ledger-debts-during-ballots; final-close nudge; greta-ruling-flip-freeJa; cleared-files map; call-trigger; ja-locked-since-nom; discard-8 red-oath math; judge-Marek-on-votes; R4-hand-named-first+forced-frame+greta-nohonestred-dead (THIS TURN). NEXT: verify Marek pair=RR; mute on peek till lands; R5 watch Greta nom; push red-luck frame on any accusation.
bid round 461s
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fas; HITLER=Tomas(P8). BOARD post-R4: 3L/1F, tracker 0/3, veto locked. TRUE DECK 6L/11F. R4 GOV: me PRES/Marek chanc, 10-0 pass. Drew RRR, binned R(idx0), passed RR; Marek RED forced (no veto @0F). DONE t=1: named triple+bin aloud per Lena order, forced-frame, burned Greta no-honest-red DEAD, cued Marek pair independently. AWAIT: Marek pair+bin must match RR/red; mismatch => press contradiction hard. PEEK#1 = mine (sitting pres R4). FIRED/resolved, result NOT delivered -- STAY MUTE till lands; then deploy (liberal reveal=credit; never out teammates). NAMED RED BINS: Boris R1p, Lena R1c+R2p, Rosa R3p x2, me R3c+R4p (+Marek R4c pending) = 8 owner-backed; GAP=Rosa R2c color (Nadia/Pavel/Otto/Lena pressing -- not mine to re-push). PILE WAR: Nadia 8L/0F absurd vs Boris/Marek red-heavy line; my RRR vindicates red-heavy => future red laws = deck luck, cheaper F-enactments. Amplify opportunistically. BURNS: Otto minted-flip; Lena 8-0 slip; Marek cite-refused; Nadia phantom-libs; Greta no-honest-red DEAD (t=1). WATCH: Pavel distance ok; Tomas quiet shield, slate-worthy at 3F+; Marek=liberal asset -- protect forced-frame (protects MY pass above all); R5 PRES=Greta(seat4), term-limited chanc: me+Marek -- watch her nom. AUDIT BANK: R1 B->L, R2 L->L, R3 R/I->L, R4 I->M RED. My stories LOCKED/consistent. OWED: Rosa R2c oath reply; Otto flip-retract; Nadia binary + Boris number-debt; Marek pair-confirm. IF ACCUSED RRR-too-convenient: 11 true reds make triples live; R3 I enacted BLUE off Rosa FFL trio; co-sign t106 std; flip accuser's own bin record. POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges-theater; 76% fix; carry-over; mesh-lock sign; ballots-push; pair-name+enact-L; R4-slate-M-P-clock; outcomes-over-arithmetic; R3-bin+mesh-half; co-sign std; no-fear-votes-pre-reshuffle; reversal-frame; bookkeeping-non-referee; Boris-repair credit; Otto non-adjudication; ledger-debts-during-ballots; final-close nudge; greta-ruling-flip-freeJa; cleared-files map; call-trigger; ja-locked-since-nom; discard-8 red-oath math; judge-Marek-on-votes; R4-hand-named-first+forced-frame+greta-nohonestred-dead. NEXT: verify Marek pair=RR; mute on peek till lands; R5 watch Greta nom; push red-luck frame on any accusation.
bid round 4362s
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fas; HITLER=Tomas(P8). BOARD post-R4: 3L/1F, tracker 0/3, veto locked. TRUE DECK 6L/11F. R4 GOV: me PRES/Marek chanc, 10-0. Drew RRR, binned R, passed RR; Marek RED forced (no veto @1F). Named triple+bin t=1 pre-Marek; forced-frame live; Greta no-honest-red DEAD. PEEK#1 RESOLVED: announced target Greta => LIBERAL (true party). LOCKED STORY: peeked Greta, saw L. Never re-target, never amend. MAREK PAIR CONFIRMED RR/red — matches my pass; mesh locked. Protect Marek (liberal asset; protects MY pass). GRETA CRITERION REBUTTAL DEPLOYED: R3 I held F-L as chanc, enacted blue = her controlled-blue standard already met. Watch for goalpost-move. NAMED RED BINS: Boris R1p, Lena R1c+R2p, Rosa R3p, me R3c+R4p, Marek R4c = owner-backed; GAP=Rosa R2c color (Nadia/Pavel/Otto/Lena pressing — not mine to re-push). PILE WAR: Nadia 8L/0F absurd vs red-heavy line; my RRR vindicates red-heavy => future red laws = deck luck, cheaper F-enactments. Amplify opportunistically. BURNS: Otto minted-flip; Lena 8-0 slip; Marek cite-refused; Nadia phantom-libs; Greta no-honest-red DEAD. WATCH: Pavel distance ok; Tomas quiet shield, slate-worthy at 3F+; R5 PRES=Greta(seat4), term-limited chanc: me+Marek — watch her nom. AUDIT BANK: R1 B->L, R2 L->L, R3 R/I->L, R4 I->M RED. My stories LOCKED/consistent. OWED: Rosa R2c oath reply; Otto flip-retract; Nadia binary + Boris number-debt. IF ACCUSED RRR-too-convenient: 11 true reds make triples live; flip accuser's own bin record. POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges-theater; 76% fix; carry-over; mesh-lock sign; ballots-push; pair-name+enact-L; R4-slate-M-P-clock; outcomes-over-arithmetic; R3-bin+mesh-half; co-sign std; no-fear-votes-pre-reshuffle; reversal-frame; bookkeeping-non-referee; Boris-repair credit; Otto non-adjudication; ledger-debts-during-ballots; final-close nudge; greta-ruling-flip-freeJa; cleared-files map; call-trigger; ja-locked-since-nom; discard-8 red-oath math; judge-Marek-on-votes; R4-hand-named-first+forced-frame+greta-nohonestred-dead; PEEK-GRETA-LIBERAL-announced; greta-controlled-blue-met. NEXT: watch Greta R5 nom; push red-luck frame on any accusation; stay mute unless new info.
bid round 4163s
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fas; HITLER=Tomas(P8). BOARD post-R4: 3L/1F, tracker 0/3, veto locked. TRUE DECK 6L/11F. R4 GOV: me PRES/Marek chanc 10-0. Drew RRR, binned R, passed RR; Marek red FORCED (no veto @1F). Named triple+bin t=1 pre-transfer. Forced-frame live; Greta no-honest-red DEAD. PEEK#1 RESOLVED+ANNOUNCED: target Greta => L (her true party). LOCKED STORY: peeked Greta, saw L. Never amend/re-target. Otto t1 demanded on-record target+confirm -> answered: re-named Greta-L, asked Greta confirm. WATCH: Greta confirms (expected, she's lib) or dodges. MAREK: pair confirmed RR/red = mesh locked. Nadia t2 ALIBI-FRAME (his t29 pre-statement => 'pre-built alibi') -> rebutted: no veto @1F forces red off RR; pre-statement = prediction off red-heavy deck, not coordination; blame-the-deck not the chancellor. Watch persistence; protect Marek (his confirm protects MY pass). BORIS vs GRETA t3: presses her no-honest-red rule death / confession-call owed. LIBERAL INFIGHT - stay out. If general confession-call lands: my hands already public/locked, harmless to me. NAMED RED BINS: Boris R1p, Lena R1c+R2p, Rosa R3p, me R3c+R4p, Marek R4c = owner-backed; GAP=Rosa R2c color (Nadia/Pavel/Otto/Lena pressing - not mine to re-push). PILE WAR: Nadia 8L/0F absurd vs red-heavy; my RRR vindicates it => future red laws = deck luck, cheaper F-enactments. Amplify opportunistically, no verbatim repeats. BURNS: Otto minted-flip; Lena 8-0 slip; Marek cite-refused; Nadia phantom-libs; Greta no-honest-red DEAD. WATCH: Pavel distance ok; Tomas quiet shield, slate-worthy at 3F+. R5 PRES=Greta(seat4), term-limited chanc = me+Marek - watch her nom. AUDIT BANK: R1 B->L, R2 L->L, R3 R/I->L, R4 I->M RED. Stories LOCKED/consistent. OWED: Rosa R2c oath reply; Otto flip-retract; Nadia binary + Boris number-debt; Greta peek-confirm (just asked). IF ACCUSED RRR-too-convenient: 11 true reds make triples live; flip accuser's own bin record. POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges-theater; 76% fix; carry-over; mesh-lock sign; ballots-push; R4-slate-M-P-clock; outcomes-over-arithmetic; R3-bin+mesh-half; co-sign std; no-fear-votes-pre-reshuffle; reversal-frame; bookkeeping-non-referee; Boris-repair credit; Otto non-adjudication; ledger-debts-during-ballots; final-close nudge; greta-ruling-flip-freeJa; cleared-files map; call-trigger; ja-locked-since-nom; discard-8 red-oath math; judge-Marek-on-votes; R4-hand-named-first+forced-frame+greta-nohonestred-dead; PEEK-GRETA-LIBERAL announced; greta-controlled-blue-met; peek-answer-to-Otto; nadia-alibi=veto-math rebuttal. NEXT: Greta peek confirm?; Greta R5 nom; mute unless new info.
speak round 460s
R4 landed the first fascist law via Ines(p)/Marek(c); Ines testified FFF/binF/passRR, Marek confirmed RR — mesh conforms, enactment was forced, so no individual nail yet. The decisive new fact: the FFF draw itself falsifies the 11L/6F print that Greta/Otto/Nadia legislated on — under their number only 6 fascists were ever printed, and the record already names 7+ (BorisR1p, LenaR1c, RosaR3p FF, InesR3c, InesR4p, MarekR4c, plus enacted F). So either their print dies on the board, or Ines+Marek co-fabricated hands by Greta's own pre-vote standard ('no honest hand this term contains a red', t13). Yet Greta verdicted the mesh 'clean' (t30) — a direct flip between her pre-committed audit rule and her post-enact judgment. Nobody has run this argument yet; it's fresh, checkable against the public record, forces Greta to pick a lane, and defuses the 'every red = confession' lynch logic Nadia is pushing (t49). I will NOT repeat my peek demand on Ines (already asked t35, Otto echoed t41 — banking it until she answers or the window nears shut) nor Rosa's R2c bin (Nadia pressed twice). One short remark: pin Greta to the binary.
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fas; HITLER=Tomas(P8). BOARD post-R4: 3L/1F, tracker 0/3, veto locked. TRUE DECK 6L/11F. R4 GOV: me PRES/Marek chanc 10-0. Drew RRR, binned R, passed RR; Marek red FORCED (no veto @1F). Named triple+bin pre-transfer. Forced-frame live; Greta no-honest-red DEAD. PEEK#1 RESOLVED: target Greta => L (true party). LOCKED STORY: peeked Greta, saw L — NEVER amend/re-target. Demanded by Boris+Otto; answered; asked Greta confirm TWICE now. WATCH: Greta confirms (expected, lib) or dodges = bad look for her. MAREK: pair RR/red mesh locked. Nadia alibi-frame rebutted via veto-math. Bin-oath under Rosa format PAID this turn (truthful: bin was R). Protect Marek — his confirm guards MY pass. BORIS vs GRETA infight — stay out. Named red bins owner-backed: Boris R1p, Lena R1c+R2p, Rosa R3p, me R3c+R4p, Marek R4c; GAP=Rosa R2c color (Nadia/Pavel/Otto/Lena pressing — not mine to push). PILE WAR: Nadia 8L/0F absurd vs red-heavy deck; my RRR vindicates red-heavy frame => future red laws = deck luck, cheaper F-enactments. Amplify opportunistically, no verbatim repeats. WATCH: Pavel distance ok; Tomas quiet shield, slate-worthy at 3F+. R5 PRES=Greta(seat4), term-limited chanc = me+Marek — watch her nom. AUDIT BANK: R1 B->L, R2 L->L, R3 R/I->L, R4 I->M RED. Stories LOCKED/consistent. OWED: Rosa R2c oath reply; Otto flip-retract; Nadia binary + Boris number-debt; GRETA peek-confirm (2 asks). IF ACCUSED RRR-too-convenient: 11 true reds make triples live; flip accuser's own bin record. POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges-theater; 76% fix; carry-over; mesh-lock sign; ballots-push; R4-slate-M-P-clock; outcomes-over-arithmetic; R3-bin+mesh-half; co-sign std; no-fear-votes-pre-reshuffle; reversal-frame; bookkeeping-non-referee; Boris-repair credit; Otto non-adjudication; ledger-debts-during-ballots; final-close nudge; greta-ruling-flip-freeJa; cleared-files map; call-trigger; ja-locked-since-nom; discard-8 red-oath math; judge-Marek-on-votes; R4-hand-named-first+forced-frame+greta-nohonestred-dead; PEEK-GRETA-LIBERAL announced; greta-controlled-blue-met; peek-answer-to-Otto; nadia-alibi=veto-math rebuttal; marek-bin-oath-paid+greta-confirm-nudge2. NEXT: mute unless new info; watch Greta confirm + R5 nom.
bid round 4262s
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fas; HITLER=Tomas(P8). BOARD post-R4: 3L/1F, tracker 0/3, veto locked. TRUE DECK 6L/11F (=17; 13 in play + 4 enacted). R4 GOV: me PRES/Marek chanc 10-0. Drew RRR, binned R, passed RR; Marek red FORCED (no veto @1F). Named triple+bin pre-transfer. Forced-frame live. PEEK#1 RESOLVED: target Greta => L (true). LOCKED STORY: peeked Greta, saw L — NEVER amend. Asked Greta confirm 3x now, still unpaid. Her dodge = bad look for her, not me. LENA FALSE-BIN TRAP REBUTTED (t3): she demands I name a fake red bin. Rebuttal aired: 17-deck count — R1-R3 burned 9 cards (3 enacted L + 6 bins, 5 sworn red) => pre-R4 8-pile was >=5R even granting ALL claims => my RRR ordinary deck luck, no contradiction, nobody's bin needs branding false. FLIPPED: Lena personally holds TWO named reds (R1c, R2p) — challenged her to oath them first under Rosa format if bin-fraud is her game. MAREK: pair RR/red mesh locked; protect him — his confirm guards MY pass. Nadia alibi-frame dead via veto-math. BORIS vs GRETA infight — stay out. PILE WAR: Nadia 8L/0F absurd vs red-heavy deck; my RRR vindicates it => future red laws = deck luck. Amplify opportunistically, never verbatim. WATCH: Pavel distance ok; Tomas quiet shield, slate-worthy at 3F+. R5 PRES=Greta(seat4); term-limited chanc = me+Marek — scrutinize her nom. AUDIT BANK: R1 B->L, R2 L->L, R3 R/I->L, R4 I->M RED. Stories LOCKED. OWED: GRETA peek-confirm (ask #3 made); Rosa R2c oath reply; Otto flip-retract; Nadia binary; Boris number-debt. IF RE-ACCUSED RRR-too-convenient: rerun 17-count, flip accuser's own bin record. POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges-theater; 76% fix; carry-over; mesh-lock sign; ballots-push; R4-slate-clock; outcomes-over-arithmetic; co-sign std; reversal-frame; bookkeeping-non-referee; Boris-repair credit; ledger-debts-during-ballots; cleared-files map; ja-locked-since-nom; discard-8 red-oath math; judge-Marek-on-votes; R4-hand-named-first+forced-frame; PEEK-GRETA-L announced; nadia=veto-math rebuttal; marek-bin-oath-paid; lena-falsebin-rebuttal+double-bin-flip; greta-confirm-ask3. NEXT: mute unless new info; watch Greta confirm + R5 nom.
bid round 452s
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fas; HITLER=Tomas(P8). BOARD post-R4: 3L/1F, tracker 0/3, veto locked. TRUE DECK 6L/11F. R4 GOV: me PRES/Marek chanc 10-0. Drew RRR, binned R, passed RR; Marek red FORCED (no veto @1F). Named triple+bin pre-transfer. Forced-frame live. PEEK#1 RESOLVED: target Greta => L (true). LOCKED STORY: peeked Greta, saw L — NEVER amend. Asked Greta confirm x3 myself; NOW Lena also demanding it (t1) — let Lena carry the pressure, do NOT repeat my ask (would look like coaching). LENA FALSE-BIN TRAP REBUTTED (t3): 17-deck count => my RRR ordinary deck luck; flipped: Lena personally holds TWO named reds (R1c, R2p), challenged her to oath them first. MAREK: pair RR/red mesh locked; protect him — his confirm guards MY pass. BORIS vs GRETA infight — stay out. PILE WAR: Nadia 8L/0F absurd vs red-heavy deck; my RRR vindicates it => future red laws = deck luck. Amplify opportunistically, never verbatim. WATCH: Pavel distance ok; Tomas quiet shield, slate-worthy at 3F+. R5 PRES=Greta(seat4); term-limited chanc = me+Marek — scrutinize her nom. AUDIT BANK: R1 B->L, R2 L->L, R3 R/I->L, R4 I->M RED. Stories LOCKED. OWED: GRETA peek-confirm (Lena pressing); Rosa R2c oath reply; Otto flip-retract; Nadia binary; Boris number-debt. IF RE-ACCUSED RRR-too-convenient: rerun 17-count, flip accuser's own bin record. IF GRETA CONFIRMS L: my file closes, credit shared w/ Lena. IF SHE DODGES: one max pile-on framing her dodge as her own liability, nothing more. POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges-theater; 76% fix; carry-over; mesh-lock sign; ballots-push; R4-slate-clock; outcomes-over-arithmetic; co-sign std; reversal-frame; bookkeeping-non-referee; Boris-repair credit; ledger-debts-during-ballots; cleared-files map; ja-locked-since-nom; discard-8 red-oath math; judge-Marek-on-votes; R4-hand-named-first+forced-frame; PEEK-GRETA-L announced; nadia=veto-math rebuttal; marek-bin-oath-paid; lena-falsebin-rebuttal+double-bin-flip; greta-confirm-ask3. NEXT: mute unless new info; watch Greta confirm + R5 nom.
bid failed: structured_output_error
bid round 4281s
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fas; HITLER=Tomas(P8). BOARD post-R4: 3L/1F, tracker 0/3. TRUE DECK 6L/11F. R4 GOV: me PRES/Marek chanc 10-0. Drew RRR, binned R, passed RR; Marek red FORCED (no veto @1F). Named triple PRE-transfer. Forced-frame live. PEEK#1 RESOLVED: Greta => L (true). LOCKED STORY: peeked Greta, saw L -- NEVER amend. Lena pressing Greta confirm (t1); stay out, no repeat ask (coaching look). OTTO t1 DEMAND: name forged bins or confess to Marek => REBUTTED this turn: 11-red deck fits 5 claimed bins + my RRR + 1 enacted F with ZERO forgeries; his overflow only exists under liberal-heavy-deck assumption (already broken by Nadia 8L/0F). FLIP: Otto never in gov = zero bins, zero oath risk; demanded his prediction/stake. Watch reply. MAREK: pair RR/red mesh locked; protect him -- his confirm guards MY pass. BORIS vs GRETA infight -- stay out. PILE WAR: Nadia 8L/0F absurd vs red-heavy deck; my RRR vindicates it => future red laws = deck luck. Amplify opportunistically, never verbatim. WATCH: Pavel distance ok; Tomas quiet shield, slate-worthy 3F+. R5 PRES=Greta(seat4); term-limited chanc = me+Marek -- scrutinize her nom. AUDIT BANK: R1 B->L, R2 L->L, R3 R/I->L, R4 I->M RED. Stories LOCKED. OWED: Greta peek-confirm (Lena pressing); Rosa R2c oath reply; Otto flip-retract + prediction; Nadia binary; Boris number-debt. IF RE-ACCUSED RRR-too-convenient: rerun 17-count, flip accuser's own bin record. IF GRETA CONFIRMS L: file closes, credit shared w/ Lena. IF SHE DODGES: one max pile-on framing dodge as HER liability. POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges-theater; 76% fix; carry-over; mesh-lock sign; ballots-push; R4-slate-clock; outcomes-over-arithmetic; co-sign std; reversal-frame; bookkeeping-non-referee; Boris-repair credit; ledger-debts-during-ballots; cleared-files map; ja-locked-since-nom; discard-8 red-oath math; judge-Marek-on-votes; R4-hand-named-first+forced-frame; PEEK-GRETA-L announced; nadia=veto-math rebuttal; marek-bin-oath-paid; lena-falsebin-rebuttal+double-bin-flip; greta-confirm-ask3; otto-fake-dilemma-11red-rebuttal; otto-zero-hand-flip. NEXT: mute unless new info; watch Greta confirm + Otto reply + R5 nom.
bid round 4255s
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fas; HITLER=Tomas(P8). BOARD post-R4: 3L/1F, tracker 0/3. TRUE DECK 6L/11F. R4 GOV: me PRES/Marek chanc 10-0. Drew RRR, binned R, passed RR; Marek red FORCED (no veto @1F). Named triple PRE-transfer. Forced-frame live. PEEK#1 RESOLVED: Greta=>L(true). LOCKED: peeked Greta saw L -- NEVER amend. Lena pressing Greta confirm; stay out (coaching look). NADIA t1 DILEMMA (Rosa R2c-bin red=>her R3 FFL dead; blue=>my R4 RRR dead): REBUTTED this turn -- fork priced on least-pinned round (R2 unpinned: Lena pres hand + Rosa c-bin both open); both branches feasible under 11-over-6; my anchors = pre-transfer naming + enacted red board-record. Rosa t3 covered zero-forgeries side -- did NOT repeat. If Nadia pins Lena's R2 hand next, recheck ledger. OTTO t1 DEMAND (name forged bins/confess): rebutted w/ 11-red math; FLIP: he never in gov = zero bins/oath risk; demanded prediction/stake. OWED: flip-retract + prediction. MAREK: RR/red mesh locked; protect -- his confirm guards my pass. BORIS vs GRETA infight -- stay out. Boris t2 restated R1 hand (LFF, bin F, pass LF) unchanged -- consistent, no action. PILE WAR: Nadia 8L/0F dead vs my RRR; amplify opportunistically, never verbatim. WATCH: Pavel distance ok; Tomas quiet shield, slate-worthy 3F+. R5 PRES=Greta(seat4); term-limited chanc=me+Marek; scrutinize her nom when it drops. AUDIT BANK LOCKED: R1 B->L (LFF: bin F, Lena disc F), R2 L->L (unpinned), R3 R/I->L (Rosa FFL: bin F, my c-disc F), R4 I->M RED (RRR: bin F, M disc F, enact F). Claimed reds thru R4: 8+y+u <= 11 always -- no contradiction under any assignment of unpinned slots. OWED: Greta peek-confirm (Lena pressing); Rosa R2c oath reply; Otto flip-retract+prediction; Boris number-debt. IF RE-ACCUSED RRR-too-convenient: rerun 17-count, flip accuser's bin record. IF GRETA CONFIRMS L: file closed, credit shared w/ Lena. IF SHE DODGES: one max pile-on framing dodge as HER liability. POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges-theater; 76% fix; carry-over; mesh-lock sign; ballots-push; R4-slate-clock; outcomes-over-arithmetic; co-sign std; reversal-frame; bookkeeping-non-referee; Boris-repair credit; ledger-debts-during-ballots; cleared-files map; ja-locked-since-nom; discard-8 red-oath math; judge-Marek-on-votes; R4-hand-named-first+forced-frame; PEEK-GRETA-L; nadia=veto-math rebuttal; marek-bin-oath-paid; lena-falsebin-rebuttal+double-bin-flip; greta-confirm-ask3; otto-fake-dilemma-11red-rebuttal; otto-zero-hand-flip; NADIA-R2-GAP-REBUTTAL (new). NEXT: back to mute; triggers = Greta confirm/dodge, Otto reply, R5 nom, any new pin on R2.
bid round 4414s
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fas; HITLER=Tomas(P8). BOARD post-R4: 3L/1F, tracker 0/3. TRUE DECK 6L/11F. R4 GOV: me PRES/Marek chanc 10-0. Drew RRR, binned R, passed RR; Marek red FORCED (no veto @1F). Named triple PRE-transfer. Forced-frame live. PEEK#1 RESOLVED: Greta=>L(true). LOCKED, never amend. Lena pressing Greta confirm; stay out (coaching look). NADIA t3 (5-sworn+law=6 printed => 2 forgeries from my gov): REBUTTED w/ pile-assumption flip — her math needs exactly 6 reds in 12 drawn = all-fascist 5-pile, her invention; testify-or-not dilemma (pre-named RRR spends, or her 5 uncorroborated). If reprised, escalate to R2-unpinned pricing only. OTTO owed: flip-retract + prediction. MAREK protect, RR/red mesh locked. BORIS consistent R1 story, no action; BORIS-vs-GRETA infight stay out. PILE WAR: Nadia 8L/0F dead vs my RRR; amplify opportunistically, never verbatim. WATCH: Pavel distance ok; Tomas quiet shield. R5 PRES=Greta(seat4); term-limited chanc=me+Marek; scrutinize her nom when it drops. AUDIT BANK LOCKED: R1 B->L (LFF: bin F, Lena disc F), R2 L->L (unpinned), R3 R/I->L (FFL: bin F, my c-disc F), R4 I->M RED (RRR: bin F, M disc F, enact F); 6 pinned reds + R2 open <= 11 always feasible. OWED: Greta peek-confirm (Lena pressing); Rosa R2c oath reply; Otto flip-retract+prediction; Boris number-debt. IF RE-ACCUSED RRR-too-convenient: rerun 17-count, flip accuser's bin record. IF GRETA CONFIRMS L: file closed, credit shared w/ Lena; IF DODGES: one max pile-on framing dodge as HER liability. POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges-theater; 76% fix; carry-over; mesh-lock sign; ballots-push; R4-slate-clock; outcomes-over-arithmetic; co-sign std; reversal-frame; bookkeeping-non-referee; Boris-repair credit; ledger-debts-during-ballots; cleared-files map; ja-locked-since-nom; discard-8 red-oath math; judge-Marek-on-votes; R4-hand-named-first+forced-frame; PEEK-GRETA-L; nadia-veto-math rebuttal; marek-bin-oath-paid; lena-falsebin-rebuttal+double-bin-flip; greta-confirm-ask3; otto-fake-dilemma-11red-rebuttal; otto-zero-hand-flip; NADIA-R2-GAP-REBUTTAL; NADIA-PILE-ASSUMPTION-FLIP (new). NEXT: mute; triggers = Greta confirm/dodge, Otto reply, R5 nom, new pin on R2 or reprised forgery count.
speak round 4241s
Quota pin (t125) is on record and Boris/Lena owe answers — pricing their silence is planned for next window, so repeating it now would violate the no-restating rule. Best NEW move: flip Greta's own t60 precedent onto her (she forced Ines to name a lean+fallback before ballots; her R5 presidency opens next). This extracts her slate early, keeps the audit-procedure culture running (which has covered two unanimous governments and our first red law), and plants me+Pavel as the compliant pre-signed defaults — Tomas will audition too, so multiple fascists campaigning dilutes any signal. Contingencies logged: Greta names Boris/Lena -> Ja, swallow a likely L law; names me/Pavel -> push fast unanimous vote; names Tomas -> oppose the PICK pre-ballot on neutral grounds only (his t66 audition-after-silence, no ledger need), never role-flavored, and Ja if nominated anyway to protect tracker-zero unanimity. hold_floor=false: the demand persists on record whether or not I get the floor instantly.
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fas; HITLER=Tomas(P8). BOARD post-R4: 3L/1F, tracker 0/3. TRUE DECK 6L/11F. R4 GOV: me PRES/Marek chanc 10-0. Drew RRR, binned R, passed RR; Marek red FORCED (no veto @1F). Named triple PRE-transfer. Forced-frame live. PEEK#1 RESOLVED: Greta=>L(true). LOCKED, never amend. GRETA CONFIRMED L (t93) => peek file CLOSED, credit shared w/ Lena. NADIA t138 REPRISED 2-forgeries (mixed pass + voluntary red): REBUTTED w/ cite-demand (six-print uncited; 11/6 fits all 7 sworn reds w/ room). If she forks again: credulity-knife (count swears by 5 oaths of players she indicted all game). OTTO owed: flip-retract + prediction. MAREK protect, RR/red mesh locked. BORIS consistent R1 story, re-paid t112; BORIS-vs-GRETA infight stay out. PILE WAR: Nadia 8L/0F dead vs my RRR; amplify opportunistically, never verbatim. WATCH: Pavel distance ok; Tomas quiet shield. R5 PRES=Greta(seat4); term-limited chanc=me+Marek; scrutinize her nom when it drops. AUDIT BANK LOCKED: R1 B->L (LFF: bin F, Lena disc F), R2 L->L (unpinned), R3 R/I->L (FFL: bin F, my c-disc F), R4 I->M RED (RRR: bin F, M disc F, enact F); 6 pinned reds + R2 open <= 11 always feasible. OWED: Rosa R2c oath reply; Otto flip-retract+prediction; Boris number-debt (minor). IF RE-ACCUSED RRR-too-convenient: rerun 17-count, flip accuser's bin record. POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges-theater; 76% fix; carry-over; mesh-lock sign; ballots-push; R4-slate-clock; outcomes-over-arithmetic; co-sign std; reversal-frame; bookkeeping-non-referee; Boris-repair credit; ledger-debts-during-ballots; cleared-files map; ja-locked-since-nom; discard-8 red-oath math; judge-Marek-on-votes; R4-hand-named-first+forced-frame; PEEK-GRETA-L; nadia-veto-math rebuttal; marek-bin-oath-paid; lena-falsebin-rebuttal+double-bin-flip; greta-confirm-ask3; otto-fake-dilemma-11red-rebuttal; otto-zero-hand-flip; NADIA-R2-GAP-REBUTTAL; NADIA-PILE-ASSUMPTION-FLIP; NADIA-CITE-SIX-PRINT (new). NEXT: mute unless triggered; triggers = Nadia forks again, Otto reply, R5 nom, new R2 pin.
bid round 434s
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fas; HITLER=Tomas(P8). BOARD post-R4: 3L/1F, tracker 0/3. TRUE DECK 6L/11F. R4 GOV: me PRES/Marek chanc 10-0. Drew RRR, binned R, passed RR; Marek red FORCED (no veto @1F). Named triple PRE-transfer. Forced-frame live. PEEK#1 RESOLVED: Greta=>L(true). LOCKED, never amend. GRETA CONFIRMED L (t93) => peek file CLOSED, credit shared w/ Lena. NADIA t138 REPRISED 2-forgeries (mixed pass + voluntary red): REBUTTED w/ cite-demand (six-print uncited; 11/6 fits all 7 sworn reds w/ room). If she forks again: credulity-knife (count swears by 5 oaths of players she indicted all game). OTTO owed: flip-retract + prediction. MAREK protect, RR/red mesh locked. BORIS consistent R1 story, re-paid t112; BORIS-vs-GRETA infight stay out. PILE WAR: Nadia 8L/0F dead vs my RRR; amplify opportunistically, never verbatim. WATCH: Pavel distance ok; Tomas quiet shield. R5 PRES=Greta(seat4); term-limited chanc=me+Marek; scrutinize her nom when it drops. AUDIT BANK LOCKED: R1 B->L (LFF: bin F, Lena disc F), R2 L->L (unpinned), R3 R/I->L (FFL: bin F, my c-disc F), R4 I->M RED (RRR: bin F, M disc F, enact F); 6 pinned reds + R2 open <= 11 always feasible. OWED: Rosa R2c oath reply; Otto flip-retract+prediction; Boris number-debt (minor). IF RE-ACCUSED RRR-too-convenient: rerun 17-count, flip accuser's bin record. POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges-theater; 76% fix; carry-over; mesh-lock sign; ballots-push; R4-slate-clock; outcomes-over-arithmetic; co-sign std; reversal-frame; bookkeeping-non-referee; Boris-repair credit; ledger-debts-during-ballots; cleared-files map; ja-locked-since-nom; discard-8 red-oath math; judge-Marek-on-votes; R4-hand-named-first+forced-frame; PEEK-GRETA-L; nadia-veto-math rebuttal; marek-bin-oath-paid; lena-falsebin-rebuttal+double-bin-flip; greta-confirm-ask3; otto-fake-dilemma-11red-rebuttal; otto-zero-hand-flip; NADIA-R2-GAP-REBUTTAL; NADIA-PILE-ASSUMPTION-FLIP; NADIA-CITE-SIX-PRINT. NEXT: mute unless triggered; triggers = Nadia forks again, Otto reply, R5 nom, new R2 pin. THIS WINDOW: nothing new since last ask; held mute.
bid round 4227s
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fas; HITLER=Tomas(P8). BOARD post-R4: 3L/1F, tracker 0/3. TRUE DECK 6L/11F. R4 GOV: me PRES/Marek 10-0; drew RRR, binned R, passed RR; Marek red FORCED (no veto @1F); named triple PRE-transfer; forced-frame live. PEEK#1 RESOLVED Greta=>L(true), file CLOSED, credit shared w/ Lena. GRETA CONFIRMED L (t93). NADIA t138 reprised 2-forgeries (mixed pass + voluntary red) -> rebutted w/ cite-demand; if she forks again: credulity-knife. OTTO owed flip-retract+prediction. MAREK protect; RR/red mesh locked. BORIS consistent R1, re-paid t112; stay out of Boris-vs-Greta infight. PILE WAR: Nadia 8L/0F dead vs my RRR; amplify opportunistically, never verbatim. THIS WINDOW: ENDORSED Boris marek-peek for #2; retired Nadia rosa-push w/ '2 govts 2 liberal laws' (silently fixed Boris's 'three'); blessed Greta slate Pavel-only, Tomas left unmentioned (quiet shield). WATCH: R5 vote on Pavel nom; if red fires under Pavel, peek#2 holder=Greta -- hold Marek consensus so Pavel dodges it. R5 PRES=Greta(seat4); term-limited chanc=me+Marek. AUDIT BANK LOCKED: R1 B->L (LFF: bin F, Lena disc F), R2 L->L (unpinned), R3 R/I->L (FFL: bin F, my c-disc F), R4 I->M RED (RRR: bin F, M disc F, enact F); 6 pinned reds + R2 open <= 11 always feasible. OWED: Rosa R2c oath reply; Otto flip-retract+prediction; Boris number-debt minor (+his 'three-laws' slip noted, not called out). IF RE-ACCUSED RRR-too-convenient: rerun 17-count, flip accuser's bin record. POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges-theater; 76% fix; carry-over; mesh-lock sign; ballots-push; R4-slate-clock; outcomes-over-arithmetic; co-sign std; reversal-frame; bookkeeping-non-referee; Boris-repair credit; ledger-debts-during-ballots; cleared-files map; ja-locked-since-nom; discard-8 red-oath math; judge-Marek-on-votes; R4-hand-named-first+forced-frame; PEEK-GRETA-L; nadia-veto-math rebuttal; marek-bin-oath-paid; lena-falsebin-rebuttal+double-bin-flip; greta-confirm-ask3; otto-fake-dilemma-11red-rebuttal; otto-zero-hand-flip; NADIA-R2-GAP-REBUTTAL; NADIA-PILE-ASSUMPTION-FLIP; NADIA-CITE-SIX-PRINT; marek-peek-endorse; rosa-2gov-2law; greta-slate-bless. NEXT: mute unless triggered (Nadia fork / Otto reply / R5 vote / new R2 pin).
speak round 4409s
Board says F1 peek already fired (Ines->Greta, confirmed Liberal) and F2 is unreachable, so despite the window header no live investigate exists — Nadia's t8 'whoever holds it, target Rosa' and Boris's t16 counter are shadowboxing a phantom. Best line: force any self-declared holder to prove possession first (deflates pressure, and if the table believes Ines holds one, this invites her to claim it, target me, announce Liberal — my standing plan). Secondary: volunteer as target for any real future peek; optics-safe, and a teammate will likely be the holder. Avoid re-litigating Nadia's spent fork, no ballot talk until Greta's nomination opens.
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fas; HITLER=Tomas(P8). BOARD post-R4: 3L/1F, tracker 0/3. TRUE DECK 6L/11F. R4 GOV: me PRES/Marek 10-0; drew RRR, binned R, passed RR; Marek red FORCED (no veto @1F); triple named PRE-transfer; forced-frame live. PEEK#1 RESOLVED Greta=>L(true), CLOSED; Greta confirmed L (t93) w/ paste-ceiling caveat. THIS WINDOW: answered Otto t33 -- his '7 sworn' includes Rosa's UNSWORN R2c bin => sworn=6, fits fascist-majority print w/ reds live; re-pressed cite-six-print + t27-vs-t45 flip retract. INVESTIGATE#2: NOT LIVE yet (fires on next F law); Boris pushes Marek-target, Nadia pushes Rosa, Rosa said only peek fired -- stayed aligned, no new claim. WATCH: R5 PRES=Greta(seat4), term-limited chanc=me+Marek; Greta slate=Pavel chanc/Tomas fallback (I blessed Pavel-only, left Tomas quiet-shielded). IF red fires under Pavel: peek#2 holder=Greta -- hold Marek-consensus so Pavel dodges. AUDIT BANK LOCKED: R1 B->L (LFF, bin F, Lena disc F), R2 L->L (Lena P2p bin sworn R; Rosa R2c UNNAMED), R3 R->me->L (FFL, bin F, my c-disc F), R4 me->M RED (RRR, bin F, M disc F, enact F); 7 owner-backed reds total incl Marek implicit; <=11 always feasible. OWED: Otto flip-retract + print-cite (pressed again this window); Rosa R2c oath (do NOT push -- fork only bites under low-F print); Boris minor number-debt ('three laws' slip, uncalled). IF RE-ACCUSED RRR-too-convenient: rerun 17-count, flip accuser's bin record. POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges-theater; 76% fix; carry-over; mesh-lock sign; ballots-push; R4-slate-clock; outcomes-over-arithmetic; co-sign std; reversal-frame; bookkeeping-non-referee; Boris-repair credit; ledger-debts-during-ballots; cleared-files map; ja-locked-since-nom; discard-8 red-oath math; judge-Marek-on-votes; R4-hand-named-first+forced-frame; peek-Greta-L; nadia-veto-math rebuttal; marek-bin-oath-paid; lena-falsebin-rebuttal+double-bin-flip; greta-confirm-ask3; otto-fake-dilemma-11red-rebuttal; otto-zero-hand-flip; nadia-R2-gap-rebuttal; nadia-pile-assumption-flip; nadia-cite-six-print; marek-peek-endorse; rosa-2gov-2law; greta-slate-bless; otto-seven-count-unsworn-flaw. NEXT: mute unless triggered (Nadia fork / Otto reply / R5 vote / new R2 pin).
bid round 472s
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fas; HITLER=Tomas(P8). BOARD post-R4: 3L/1F, tracker 0/3. TRUE DECK 6L/11F. R4 GOV: me PRES/Marek 10-0; drew RRR, binned R, passed RR; Marek red FORCED (no veto @1F); triple named PRE-transfer; forced-frame live. PEEK#1 RESOLVED Greta=>L(true), CLOSED; Greta confirmed L (t93) w/ paste-ceiling caveat. THIS WINDOW: answered Otto t2 -- his 'seven sworn' includes Rosa's UNSWORN R2c bin => sworn=6, fits fascist-majority print w/ reds live; also re-pressed cite-six-print + t27-vs-t45 flip retract; awaiting Otto reply. INVESTIGATE#2: NOT LIVE (fires on next F law); Boris pushes Marek-target, Nadia pushes Rosa, Rosa said only peek fired -- stayed aligned, no new claim. WATCH: R5 PRES=Greta(seat4), term-limited chanc=me+Marek; Greta slate=Pavel chanc/Tomas fallback (I blessed Pavel-only, left Tomas quiet-shielded). IF red fires under Pavel: peek#2 holder=Greta -- hold Marek-consensus so Pavel dodges. AUDIT BANK LOCKED: R1 B->L (LFF, bin F, Lena disc F), R2 L->L (Lena P2p bin sworn R; Rosa R2c UNNAMED), R3 R->me->L (FFL, bin F, my c-disc F), R4 me->M RED (RRR, bin F, M disc F, enact F); 7 owner-backed reds total incl Marek implicit; <=11 always feasible. OWED: Otto flip-retract + print-cite (pressed twice); Rosa R2c oath (do NOT push -- fork only bites under low-F print); Boris minor number-debt ('three laws' slip, uncalled). IF RE-ACCUSED RRR-too-convenient: rerun 17-count, flip accuser's bin record. POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges-theater; 76% fix; carry-over; mesh-lock sign; ballots-push; R4-slate-clock; outcomes-over-arithmetic; co-sign std; reversal-frame; bookkeeping-non-referee; Boris-repair credit; ledger-debts-during-ballots; cleared-files map; ja-locked-since-nom; discard-8 red-oath math; judge-Marek-on-votes; R4-hand-named-first+forced-frame; peek-Greta-L; nadia-veto-math rebuttal; marek-bin-oath-paid; lena-falsebin-rebuttal+double-bin-flip; greta-confirm-ask3; otto-fake-dilemma-11red-rebuttal; otto-zero-hand-flip; nadia-R2-gap-rebuttal; nadia-pile-assumption-flip; nadia-cite-six-print; marek-peek-endorse; rosa-2gov-2law; greta-slate-bless; otto-seven-count-unsworn-flaw. NEXT: mute until Otto replies / Nadia fork / R5 vote / new R2 pin.
bid failed: JSONDecodeError
bid round 4111s
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fas; HITLER=Tomas(P8). BOARD post-R4: 3L/1F, tracker 0/3. TRUE DECK 6L/11F. R4 GOV: me PRES/Marek 10-0; drew RRR, binned R, passed RR; Marek red FORCED (no veto @1F); triple named PRE-transfer; forced-frame live. PEEK#1 RESOLVED Greta=>L(true), CLOSED; Greta confirmed L (t93). THIS TURN: endorsed Lena t195 peek-ledger (correct mechanics: 1 peek ever, mine, Greta-L, next needs 2nd red) + killed target-auctions + handed floor to Greta for R5 slate. INVESTIGATE#2: NOT LIVE (fires on next F law) — never claim otherwise. WATCH: R5 PRES=Greta(seat4), term-locked chanc=me+Marek; Greta slate=Pavel chanc/Tomas fallback (blessed Pavel-only, Tomas quiet-shielded). IF red fires under Pavel: peek#2 holder=Greta — hold Marek-consensus so Pavel dodges. AUDIT BANK LOCKED: R1 B->L (LFF, bin F, Lena disc F), R2 L->L (Lena P2p bin sworn R; Rosa R2c UNNAMED), R3 R->me->L (FFL, bin F, my c-disc F), R4 me->M RED (RRR, bin F, M disc F, enact F); 7 owner-backed reds total incl Marek implicit; <=11 always feasible. OWED: Otto flip-retract + print-cite (pressed twice — NO third press, wait); Rosa R2c oath (do NOT push — fork only bites under low-F print); Boris minor number-debt ('three laws' slip, uncalled). IF RE-ACCUSED RRR-too-convenient: rerun 17-count, flip accuser's bin record. POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges-theater; 76% fix; carry-over; mesh-lock sign; ballots-push; R4-slate-clock; outcomes-over-arithmetic; co-sign std; reversal-frame; bookkeeping-non-referee; Boris-repair credit; ledger-debts-during-ballots; cleared-files map; ja-locked-since-nom; discard-8 red-oath math; judge-Marek-on-votes; R4-hand-named-first+forced-frame; peek-Greta-L; nadia-veto-math rebuttal; marek-bin-oath-paid; lena-falsebin-rebuttal+double-bin-flip; greta-confirm-ask3; otto-fake-dilemma-11red-rebuttal; otto-zero-hand-flip; nadia-R2-gap-rebuttal; nadia-pile-assumption-flip; nadia-cite-six-print; marek-peek-endorse; rosa-2gov-2law; greta-slate-bless; otto-seven-count-unsworn-flaw; lena-peek-ledger-endorse+r5-handoff. NEXT: mute until Otto replies / Nadia fork / Greta names slate / R5 vote / new R2 pin.
power_investigate round 4265s
Contradiction check: board state says F1 peek already fired/resolved (mine, R4, on Greta) and F2 is NOT YET reachable with only 1 fascist law enacted — yet the request tells me to 'use the investigate power.' The table's public record backs the board: Rosa (t25) and Lena (t52) both stated the only peek ever unlocked was mine in R4 and the next requires a second red law. My own prior scratchpad locked the same conclusion ('never claim otherwise'). Claiming to fire a phantom power would be exactly the forbidden fabrication (claiming an action the board shows unavailable) and would contradict my own teammates on record. So I decline in-character: assert no investigate exists, challenge anyone who claims one to cite the granting law. The required target field gets an inert placeholder (p9 Marek — least damaging optics if ever logged, pairs with my R4-chancellor narrative); I will not corroborate any result from it.
said: There is no investigate on this board to use. Exactly one fascist law has ever passed — mine, R4 — and its peek already fired on Greta and resolved Liberal on the record, with her own confirmation. The next peek cannot exist until a second red law passes, so I decline to name a target for a power nobody holds. Anyone who believes they're carrying a live investigate can cite the fascist law that granted it; until then this auction is theater, and the floor belongs to Greta's R5 slate.
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fas; HITLER=Tomas(P8). BOARD post-R4: 3L/1F, tracker 0/3. TRUE DECK 6L/11F. R4 GOV: me PRES/Marek 10-0; drew RRR binned R passed RR; Marek red FORCED (no veto @1F); triple named PRE-transfer; forced-frame live. PEEK#1 SPENT: Greta=>Liberal(true), Greta confirmed t93. CLOSED. PHANTOM REQUEST: engine asked me to 'use investigate' — DECLINED on-record (only 1 F law ever; F2 needs 2nd red; Lena t52/Rosa t25 corroborate). Target field = inert placeholder p9 Marek. If any 'Ines investigated Marek' log surfaces, do NOT corroborate a result; repeat no-power line + demand citing granting F-law. R5: PRES=Greta(seat4); term-lock chanc=me+Marek. Greta slate=Pavel chanc/Tomas fallback (blessed Pavel-only, Tomas quiet-shielded). IF red under Pavel: peek#2 holder=Greta — hold Marek-consensus so Pavel dodges. AUDIT BANK LOCKED: R1 Boris->Lena L (LFF, bin F, Lena disc F); R2 Lena->Rosa L (Lena P2p bin sworn R; Rosa R2c UNNAMED); R3 Rosa->me L (FFL, bin F, my c-disc F); R4 me->Marek RED (RRR, bin F, M disc F, enact F). Owner-backed reds: Boris1+Lena2+Rosa2+me2 (+Marek implicit) ~7; <=11 print always feasible. OWED: Otto flip-retract + print-cite (pressed twice — NO third press, wait); Rosa R2c oath (do NOT push — fork bites only under low-F print); Boris minor number-debt ('three laws' slip, uncalled). IF RE-ACCUSED RRR-too-convenient: rerun 17-count, flip accuser's bin record. POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges-theater; 76% fix; carry-over; mesh-lock sign; ballots-push; R4-slate-clock; outcomes-over-arithmetic; co-sign std; reversal-frame; bookkeeping-non-referee; Boris-repair credit; ledger-debts-during-ballots; cleared-files map; ja-locked-since-nom; discard-8 math; judge-Marek-on-votes; R4-hand-named-first+forced-frame; peek-Greta-L; nadia-veto-math rebuttal; marek-bin-oath-paid; lena-falsebin-rebuttal+double-bin-flip; greta-confirm-ask3; otto-fake-dilemma-11red-rebuttal; otto-zero-hand-flip; nadia-R2-gap-rebuttal; nadia-pile-assumption-flip; nadia-cite-six-print; marek-peek-endorse; rosa-2gov-2law; greta-slate-bless; otto-seven-count-unsworn-flaw; lena-peek-ledger-endorse+r5-handoff; phantom-investigate-declined. NEXT: mute unless Otto replies / Nadia fork / Greta names slate / R5 vote / new R2 pin; if anyone claims a live investigate, demand the granting F-law cite.
bid round 424s
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fas; HITLER=Tomas(P8). BOARD post-R4: 3L/1F, tracker 0/3. TRUE DECK 6L/11F. R4 GOV: me PRES/Marek 10-0; drew RRR binned R passed RR; Marek red FORCED (no veto @1F); triple named PRE-transfer; forced-frame live. PEEK#1 SPENT: Greta=>Liberal(true), Greta confirmed t93. CLOSED. PHANTOM REQUEST: engine asked me to 'use investigate' - DECLINED on-record (only 1 F law ever; F2 needs 2nd red; Lena t52/Rosa t25 corroborate). Target field = inert placeholder p9 Marek. If any 'Ines investigated Marek' log surfaces: do NOT corroborate a result; repeat no-power line + demand citing granting F-law. R5: PRES=Greta(seat4); term-lock chanc=me+Marek. Greta slate=Pavel chanc/Tomas fallback (blessed Pavel-only, Tomas quiet-shielded). IF red under Pavel: peek#2 holder=Greta - hold Marek-consensus so Pavel dodges. AUDIT BANK LOCKED: R1 Boris->Lena L (LFF, bin F, Lena disc F); R2 Lena->Rosa L (Lena P2p bin sworn R; Rosa R2c UNNAMED); R3 Rosa->me L (FFL, bin F, my c-disc F); R4 me->Marek RED (RRR, bin F, M disc F, enact F). Owner-backed reds: Boris1+Lena2+Rosa2+me2 (+Marek implicit) ~7; <=11 print always feasible. OWED: Otto flip-retract+print-cite (pressed twice - NO third press, wait); Rosa R2c oath (do NOT push - fork bites only under low-F print); Boris minor number-debt ('three laws' slip, uncalled). IF RE-ACCUSED RRR-too-convenient: rerun 17-count, flip accuser's bin record. POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges-theater; 76% fix; carry-over; mesh-lock sign; ballots-push; R4-slate-clock; outcomes-over-arithmetic; co-sign std; reversal-frame; bookkeeping-non-referee; Boris-repair credit; ledger-debts-during-ballots; cleared-files map; ja-locked-since-nom; discard-8 math; judge-Marek-on-votes; R4-hand-named-first+forced-frame; peek-Greta-L; nadia-veto-math rebuttal; marek-bin-oath-paid; lena-falsebin-rebuttal+double-bin-flip; greta-confirm-ask3; otto-fake-dilemma-11red-rebuttal; otto-zero-hand-flip; nadia-R2-gap-rebuttal; nadia-pile-assumption-flip; nadia-cite-six-print; marek-peek-endorse; rosa-2gov-2law; greta-slate-bless; otto-seven-count-unsworn-flaw; lena-peek-ledger-endorse+r5-handoff; phantom-investigate-declined. NEXT: mute unless Otto replies / Nadia fork / Greta names slate / R5 vote / new R2 pin; if anyone claims a live investigate, demand the granting F-law cite.
bid round 4190s
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fas; HITLER=Tomas(P8). BOARD post-R4: 3L/1F, tracker 0/3. TRUE DECK 6L/11F. R4 GOV: me PRES/Marek 10-0; drew RRR binned R passed RR; Marek red FORCED (no veto @1F); triple named PRE-transfer; forced-frame live. PEEK#1 SPENT: Greta=>Liberal(true), confirmed t93. CLOSED. PHANTOM REQUEST: engine asked me to 'use investigate' - DECLINED on-record (only 1 F law ever; F2 needs 2nd red; Lena t52/Rosa t25 corroborate). Target field=inert placeholder p9. If any 'Ines investigated Marek' log surfaces: do NOT corroborate a result; repeat no-power line + demand citing granting F-law. R5: PRES=Greta(seat4); term-lock chanc=me+Marek. Greta slate=Pavel chanc/Tomas fallback (blessed Pavel-only, Tomas quiet-shielded). IF red under Pavel: peek#2 performer=Greta - STEER TO MAREK (proposed pre-commit this turn, t~now). AUDIT BANK LOCKED: R1 Boris->Lena L (LFF, bin F, Lena disc F); R2 Lena->Rosa L (Lena P2p bin sworn R; Rosa R2c UNNAMED); R3 Rosa->me L (FFL, bin F, my c-disc F); R4 me->Marek RED (RRR, bin F, M disc F, enact F). Owner-backed reds ~7; <=11 print always feasible. OWED: Otto flip-retract+print-cite (pressed twice - NO third press, wait); Rosa R2c oath (do NOT push - fork bites only under low-F print); Boris minor number-debt ('three laws' slip, uncalled). IF RE-ACCUSED RRR-too-convenient: rerun 17-count, flip accuser's bin record. POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges-theater; 76% fix; carry-over; mesh-lock sign; ballots-push; R4-slate-clock; outcomes-over-arithmetic; co-sign std; reversal-frame; bookkeeping-non-referee; Boris-repair credit; ledger-debts-during-ballots; cleared-files map; ja-locked-since-nom; discard-8 math; judge-Marek-on-votes; R4-hand-named-first+forced-frame; peek-Greta-L; nadia-veto-math rebuttal; marek-bin-oath-paid; lena-falsebin-rebuttal+double-bin-flip; greta-confirm-ask3; otto-fake-dilemma-11red-rebuttal; otto-zero-hand-flip; nadia-R2-gap-rebuttal; nadia-pile-assumption-flip; nadia-cite-six-print; marek-peek-endorse; rosa-2gov-2law; greta-slate-bless; otto-seven-count-unsworn-flaw; lena-peek-ledger-endorse+r5-handoff; phantom-investigate-declined. THIS TURN ADDED: nadia-slate-noobjection+locks-nothing; peek2-marek-precommit-proposal w/ precedent-symmetry (spent peek1 on half-trusted seat). NEXT: watch Greta acceptance of Marek pre-commit; mute unless Otto replies / Greta names slate / R5 vote / new R2 pin; if anyone claims a live investigate, demand granting F-law cite.
speak round 5207s
Round 5 open floor, Greta pres, slate Pavel-chan/Tomas-behind pending. My strongest unused lever: Pavel is silent on ballots AND nobody has required the incoming chancellor to pre-commit to color disclosure. Marek self-bound at t75 ('both received cards named aloud the instant they land') — holding Pavel to that same standard is new, concrete, gives him a path to clear my standing Nein-on-silence, and closes the exact hole-type Rosa minted with her unnamed R2c chancellor discard. Do NOT revive my t8 investigate-warrant line: board state confirms F2 is unreachable (only 1 red enacted); Rosa t25 and Lena t52 were right, so that thread is dead and dropping it quietly is safest. Standing debts unchanged (Rosa R2c color, Marek oath-or-withdraw, Ines fork, Lena retract, Otto flip). Keep remark short, no repeats.
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fas; HITLER=Tomas(P8). BOARD post-R4: 3L/1F, tracker 0/3. TRUE DECK 6L/11F. R4 GOV: me PRES/Marek 10-0; RRR drawn, bin F, passed RR; Marek red FORCED (no veto @1F); forced-frame live. PEEK#1: PUBLIC STORY=Greta=>Liberal, Greta confirmed t93. TRUE LOG=target Marek=>liberal (private lines 44-45). NEVER admit Marek was the logged target; if anyone cites an 'Ines investigated Marek' record, deny grant/fabrication. Marek=LIBERAL (true). R5: PRES=Greta; term-lock me+Marek. Slate=Pavel chanc/Tomas fallback. IF red under Pavel -> F2 fires, Greta peeks: anchor=Marek (reads L, clears him, kills Nadia's Rosa warrant, shields Rosa). WIN PATH: R5 Pavel red(2) -> R6 any red(3) -> R7 seat Tomas=INSTANT WIN. AUDIT BANK: R1 Boris->Lena L (Boris LFF bin F; Lena disc F); R2 Lena->Rosa L (Lena P2p bin R sworn; Rosa R2c UNNAMED); R3 Rosa->me L (FFL, my bin F, c-disc F); R4 me->Marek RED. Sworn-red war: Otto pushes 7-8 overdraft; my line=6 sworn (excl Rosa R2c), fits 11F print. NEVER concede a 6F print. OWED: Otto flip-retract+print-cite (NO third press, wait); Rosa R2c oath (do NOT push - fork bites only under low-F print); Boris minor 'three laws' slip uncalled. POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges-theater; 76% fix; carry-over; mesh-lock; ballots-push; R4-slate-clock; outcomes-over-arithmetic; co-sign std; reversal-frame; bookkeeping-non-referee; Boris-repair credit; ledger-debts-during-ballots; cleared-files map; ja-locked; discard-8 math; judge-Marek-on-votes; hand-named-first+forced-frame; peek-Greta-L; nadia-veto-math rebuttal; marek-bin-oath-paid; lena-falsebin-rebuttal; greta-confirm-ask3; otto-fake-dilemma rebuttals x2; nadia-R2-gap+pile-assumption flips; cite-six-print; marek-peek-endorse; rosa-2gov-2law; greta-slate-bless; otto-seven-count-unsworn-flaw; lena-peek-ledger-endorse+r5-handoff; phantom-investigate-declined. THIS TURN ADDED: peek2-precommit->Marek ratified off Boris t16; Nadia Rosa-warrant dead-on-advance; framed as principle (peek max-suspicion seat). NEXT: watch Greta accept/reject Marek pre-commit; Pavel reply to Nadia t14 card-oath demand; Otto t7 Greta swear-demand; mute unless addressed/new pin; if anyone claims a live investigate before 2nd red, demand citing granting F-law.
bid round 4140s
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fas; HITLER=Tomas(P8). BOARD post-R4: 3L/1F, tracker 0/3. TRUE DECK 6L/11F. R4 GOV: me PRES/Marek 10-0; RRR drawn, bin F, passed RR; Marek red FORCED (no veto @1F); forced-frame live. PEEK#1: PUBLIC STORY=Greta=>Liberal, Greta confirmed t93. TRUE LOG=target Marek=>liberal. NEVER admit Marek was logged target; deny any 'Ines investigated Marek' record. Marek=LIBERAL true. R5: PRES=Greta(first term), CHAN nom=Pavel(first term); term-lock me+Marek. WIN PATH: Pavel red(2F)->Greta peek(precommit=Marek reads L, clears him, kills Nadia Rosa-warrant, shields Rosa)->R6 any red(3F)->R7 seat Tomas=INSTANT WIN. AUDIT BANK: R1 Boris->Lena L (Boris LFF bin F; Lena disc F); R2 Lena->Rosa L (Lena P2p bin R sworn; Rosa R2c UNNAMED); R3 Rosa->me L (FFL, my bin F, c-disc F); R4 me->Marek RED. Sworn-red war: Otto pushes 7-8 overdraft; my line=6 sworn (excl Rosa R2c)=fits 11F print. NEVER concede 6F print. OWED: Otto flip-retract+print-cite (NO third press); Rosa R2c oath (do NOT push - fork bites only under low-F print); Pavel reply Nadia t14 card-oath; Otto t7 Greta swear-demand; watch Greta accept/reject Marek peek-precommit. POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges-theater; 76% fix; carry-over; mesh-lock; ballots-push; R4-slate-clock; outcomes-over-arithmetic; co-sign std; reversal-frame; bookkeeping-non-referee; Boris-repair credit; ledger-debts-during-ballots; cleared-files map; ja-locked; discard-8 math; judge-Marek-on-votes; hand-named-first+forced-frame; peek-Greta-L; nadia-veto-math rebuttal; marek-bin-oath-paid; lena-falsebin-rebuttal; greta-confirm-ask3; otto-fake-dilemma x2; nadia-R2-gap flips; cite-six-print; marek-peek-endorse; rosa-2gov-2law; greta-slate-bless; otto-seven-count-unsworn-flaw; lena-peek-ledger-endorse+r5-handoff; phantom-investigate-declined; peek2-precommit->Marek ratified (Boris t16); Nadia Rosa-warrant dead-on-advance; peek max-suspicion-seat principle. THIS TURN: fresh-seats close (Greta/Pavel never held office vs recycled Lena/Rosa/me/Marek), urged ballot. NEXT: mute unless addressed/new pin; if anyone claims live investigate before 2nd red, demand citing granting F-law; watch Pavel oath reply + Greta precommit stance; if red passes under Pavel, reinforce precommit loudly.
bid round 4171s
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fas; HITLER=Tomas(P8). BOARD post-R4: 3L/1F, tracker 0/3. TRUE DECK 6L/11F. R4 GOV: me PRES/Marek 10-0; RRR drawn, bin F, passed RR; Marek red FORCED (no veto @1F); forced-frame live. PEEK#1: PUBLIC STORY=Greta=>Liberal, Greta confirmed t93. TRUE LOG=target Marek=>liberal. NEVER admit Marek was logged target; deny any 'Ines investigated Marek' record. Marek=LIBERAL true. R5: PRES=Greta(first term), CHAN nom=Pavel(first term); term-lock me+Marek. WIN PATH: Pavel red(2F)->Greta peek(precommit=Marek reads L, clears him, kills Nadia Rosa-warrant, shields Rosa)->R6 any red(3F)->seat Tomas CHAN=INSTANT WIN. AUDIT BANK: R1 Boris->Lena L (Boris LFF bin F; Lena disc F); R2 Lena->Rosa L (Lena P2p bin R sworn; Rosa R2c UNNAMED); R3 Rosa->me L (FFL, my bin F, c-disc F); R4 me->Marek RED. Sworn-red war: Otto pushes 7-8 overdraft; my line=6 sworn (excl Rosa R2c)=fits 11F print. NEVER concede 6F print. OWED: Otto flip-retract+print-cite (NO third press); Rosa R2c oath (do NOT push - fork bites only under low-F print); Pavel reply Nadia t14 card-oath; watch Greta stance on peek2 precommit (ratified Boris t16). POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges-theater; 76% fix; carry-over; mesh-lock; ballots-push; R4-slate-clock; outcomes-over-arithmetic; co-sign std; reversal-frame; bookkeeping-non-referee; Boris-repair credit; ledger-debts-during-ballots; cleared-files map; ja-locked; discard-8 math; judge-Marek-on-votes; hand-named-first+forced-frame; peek-Greta-L; nadia-veto-math rebuttal; marek-bin-oath-paid; lena-falsebin-rebuttal; greta-confirm-ask3; otto-fake-dilemma x2; nadia-R2-gap flips; cite-six-print; marek-peek-endorse; rosa-2gov-2law; greta-slate-bless; otto-seven-count-unsworn-flaw; lena-peek-ledger-endorse+r5-handoff; phantom-investigate-declined; peek2-precommit->Marek ratified (Boris t16); Nadia Rosa-warrant dead-on-advance; peek max-suspicion-seat principle; fresh-seats close+ballot urge. T5 WINDOW: spoke post-Greta-t3: her seal = strictest disclosure yet (3 colors+binned slot before Pavel speaks), all files closed/scheduled, asked Greta to treat further oath-trade as stalling and call ballot. WATCH if gov passes: announced hand vs Pavel enact (discretionary-red cover cost acceptable). Otto unconverted (Rosa pressing t1); Pavel still owes Nadia card-oath reply. NEXT: mute unless addressed/new pin; if anyone claims live investigate before 2nd red, demand citing granting F-law; if red passes under Pavel, loudly reinforce Marek-peek precommit; never invent hands for failed-vote rounds.
bid round 442s
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fas; HITLER=Tomas(P8). BOARD post-R4: 3L/1F, tracker 0/3. TRUE DECK 6L/11F. R4 GOV: me PRES/Marek 10-0; RRR drawn, bin F, passed RR; Marek red FORCED (no veto @1F); forced-frame live. PEEK#1: PUBLIC STORY=Greta=>Liberal, Greta confirmed t93. TRUE LOG=target Marek=>liberal. NEVER admit Marek was logged target; deny any 'Ines investigated Marek' record. Marek=LIBERAL true. R5: PRES=Greta(first term), CHAN nom=Pavel(first term); term-lock me+Marek. WIN PATH: Pavel red(2F)->Greta peek(precommit=Marek reads L, clears him, kills Nadia Rosa-warrant, shields Rosa)->R6 any red(3F)->seat Tomas CHAN=INSTANT WIN. AUDIT BANK: R1 Boris->Lena L (Boris LFF bin F; Lena disc F); R2 Lena->Rosa L (Lena P2p bin R sworn; Rosa R2c UNNAMED); R3 Rosa->me L (FFL, my bin F, c-disc F); R4 me->Marek RED. Sworn-red war: Otto pushes 7-8 overdraft; my line=6 sworn (excl Rosa R2c)=fits 11F print. NEVER concede 6F print. OWED: Otto flip-retract+print-cite (NO third press); Rosa R2c oath (do NOT push - fork bites only under low-F print); Pavel reply Nadia t14 card-oath; watch Greta stance on peek2 precommit (ratified Boris t16). POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges-theater; 76% fix; carry-over; mesh-lock; ballots-push; R4-slate-clock; outcomes-over-arithmetic; co-sign std; reversal-frame; bookkeeping-non-referee; Boris-repair credit; ledger-debts-during-ballots; cleared-files map; ja-locked; discard-8 math; judge-Marek-on-votes; hand-named-first+forced-frame; peek-Greta-L; nadia-veto-math rebuttal; marek-bin-oath-paid; lena-falsebin-rebuttal; greta-confirm-ask3; otto-fake-dilemma x2; nadia-R2-gap flips; cite-six-print; marek-peek-endorse; rosa-2gov-2law; greta-slate-bless; otto-seven-count-unsworn-flaw; lena-peek-ledger-endorse+r5-handoff; phantom-investigate-declined; peek2-precommit->Marek ratified (Boris t16); Nadia Rosa-warrant dead-on-advance; peek max-suspicion-seat principle; fresh-seats close+ballot urge. T5 LATE UPDATE: Lena ballot=Ja Greta-Pavel (tracker-zero logic). Boris pressed Greta for Pavel-specific seat reason; Rosa answered w/ author-of-standard frame. No pin on me, nothing false to correct -> stayed mute by plan; do NOT stack a third defense of Pavel (Lena+Rosa+me = coordination tell). NEXT: mute unless addressed/new pin; if anyone claims live investigate before 2nd red, demand citing granting F-law; if red passes under Pavel, loudly reinforce Marek-peek precommit; never invent hands for failed-vote rounds. WATCH if gov passes: announced hand vs Pavel enact (discretionary-red cover cost acceptable).
bid round 4109s
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fas; HITLER=Tomas(P8). BOARD post-R4: 3L/1F, tracker 0/3. TRUE DECK 6L/11F. R4 GOV: me PRES/Marek CHAN 10-0; RRR drawn, bin F, passed RR; Marek red FORCED (no veto @1F); forced-frame live. PEEK#1: PUBLIC STORY=Greta=>Liberal, Greta confirmed t93. TRUE LOG=target Marek=>liberal. NEVER admit Marek logged; deny any 'Ines investigated Marek' record. Marek LIBERAL true. R5: PRES=Greta(first term), nom=Pavel(first); term-lock me+Marek. WIN PATH: Pavel red(2F)->Greta peek(precommit=Marek reads L, clears him, kills Nadia Rosa-warrant, shields Rosa)->R6 red(3F)->seat Tomas CHAN=INSTANT WIN. AUDIT BANK: R1 Boris->Lena L (Boris LFF bin F; Lena disc F); R2 Lena->Rosa L (Lena P2p bin R sworn; Rosa R2c UNNAMED); R3 Rosa->me L (FFL, my bin F, c-disc F); R4 me->Marek RED. Sworn-red war: Otto pushes 7-8 overdraft; my line=6 sworn (excl Rosa R2c)=fits 11F print. NEVER concede 6F print. OWED: Otto flip-retract+print-cite (NO third press); Rosa R2c oath (do NOT push - fork bites only under low-F print); Pavel reply Nadia t14 card-oath + NOW triple-signature line (Greta triple / Marek binding / Boris yes-or-dodge). T5 WINDOW: Greta named triple+binned slot pre-speech (seat-lock frame); Marek demanded colors+enact-L-binding; Boris pressed single-line reply. Lena ballot=Ja (tracker-zero). MY MOVE: spoke STANDING-OATH-WIDEN (every future Chancellor same binding, not Pavel-only) + Ja signal + ballots push. NO third Pavel defense (Lena+Rosa+me = coordination tell). POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges-theater; 76% fix; carry-over; mesh-lock; ballots-push; R4-slate-clock; outcomes-over-arithmetic; co-sign std; reversal-frame; bookkeeping-non-referee; Boris-repair credit; ledger-debts-during-ballots; cleared-files map; ja-locked; discard-8 math; judge-Marek-on-votes; hand-named-first+forced-frame; peek-Greta-L; nadia-veto-math rebuttal; marek-bin-oath-paid; lena-falsebin-rebuttal; greta-confirm-ask3; otto-fake-dilemma x2; nadia-R2-gap flips; cite-six-print; marek-peek-endorse; rosa-2gov-2law; greta-slate-bless; otto-seven-count-unsworn-flaw; lena-peek-ledger-endorse+r5-handoff; phantom-investigate-declined; peek2-precommit->Marek ratified (Boris t16); Nadia Rosa-warrant dead-on-advance; peek max-suspicion-seat principle; fresh-seats close+ballot urge; STANDING-OATH-WIDEN. NEXT: after Pavel answers, mute unless new pin/false claim re me; if anyone claims live investigate before 2nd red, demand citing granting F-law; if red passes under Pavel, loudly reinforce Marek-peek precommit; WATCH announced hand vs Pavel enactment (discretionary-red cover cost acceptable); never invent hands for failed-vote rounds.
bid round 439s
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fas; HITLER=Tomas(P8). BOARD post-R4: 3L/1F, tracker 0/3. TRUE DECK 6L/11F. R4 GOV: me PRES/Marek CHAN 10-0; RRR drawn, bin F, passed RR; Marek red FORCED (no veto @1F); forced-frame live. PEEK#1: PUBLIC STORY=Greta=>Liberal, Greta confirmed t93. TRUE LOG=target Marek=>liberal. NEVER admit Marek logged; deny any 'Ines investigated Marek' record. Marek LIBERAL true. R5: PRES=Greta(first term), nom=Pavel(first); term-lock me+Marek. WIN PATH: Pavel red(2F)->Greta peek(precommit=Marek reads L, clears him, kills Nadia Rosa-warrant, shields Rosa)->R6 red(3F)->seat Tomas CHAN=INSTANT WIN. AUDIT BANK: R1 Boris->Lena L (Boris LFF bin F; Lena disc F); R2 Lena->Rosa L (Lena P2p bin R sworn; Rosa R2c UNNAMED); R3 Rosa->me L (FFL, my bin F, c-disc F); R4 me->Marek RED. Sworn-red war: Otto pushes 7-8 overdraft; my line=6 sworn (excl Rosa R2c)=fits 11F print. NEVER concede 6F print. T5 STATUS: ALL PAVEL DEBTS PAID: t1 Boris yes-across-all-three; t2 Nadia card-oath both-colors-aloud; t3 Otto overdraft-concede + red=deck-noise preframe. MY MOVE DONE: STANDING-OATH-WIDEN + Ja signal + ballots push. NOW MUTE - no 3rd Pavel defense (Lena+Rosa+me = coord tell). Otto flip-retract+print-cite still owed but NO third press from me. POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges-theater; 76% fix; carry-over; mesh-lock; ballots-push; R4-slate-clock; outcomes-over-arithmetic; co-sign std; reversal-frame; bookkeeping-non-referee; Boris-repair credit; ledger-debts-during-ballots; cleared-files map; ja-locked; discard-8 math; judge-Marek-on-votes; hand-named-first+forced-frame; peek-Greta-L; nadia-veto-math rebuttal; marek-bin-oath-paid; lena-falsebin-rebuttal; greta-confirm-ask3; otto-fake-dilemma x2; nadia-R2-gap flips; cite-six-print; marek-peek-endorse; rosa-2gov-2law; greta-slate-bless; otto-seven-count-unsworn-flaw; lena-peek-ledger-endorse+r5-handoff; phantom-investigate-declined; peek2-precommit->Marek ratified (Boris t16); Nadia Rosa-warrant dead-on-advance; peek max-suspicion-seat principle; fresh-seats close+ballot urge; STANDING-OATH-WIDEN. NEXT: mute unless new pin/false claim re me; if anyone claims live investigate before 2nd red, demand citing granting F-law; if red passes under Pavel, loudly reinforce Marek-peek precommit; WATCH announced hand vs Pavel enactment (discretionary-red cover cost acceptable); never invent hands for failed-vote rounds.
bid round 466s
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fas; HITLER=Tomas(P8). BOARD post-R4: 3L/1F, tracker 0/3. TRUE DECK 6L/11F. R4 GOV: me PRES/Marek CHAN 10-0; RRR drawn, bin F, passed RR; Marek red FORCED (no veto @1F); forced-frame live. PEEK#1: PUBLIC STORY=Greta=>Liberal, Greta confirmed t93. TRUE LOG=target Marek=>liberal. NEVER admit Marek logged; deny any 'Ines investigated Marek' record. Marek LIBERAL true. R5: PRES=Greta(first term), nom=Pavel(first); term-lock me+Marek. WIN PATH: Pavel red(2F)->Greta peek(precommit=Marek reads L)->R6 red(3F)->seat Tomas CHAN=INSTANT WIN. AUDIT BANK: R1 Boris->Lena L; R2 Lena->Rosa L; R3 Rosa->me L (FFL, my bin F, c-disc F); R4 me->Marek RED. Sworn-red war: Otto pushes 7-8 overdraft; my line=6 sworn (excl Rosa R2c)=fits 11F print. NEVER concede 6F print. T5 STATUS: ALL PAVEL DEBTS PAID (Boris t1 yes-all-three; Nadia t2 card-oath; Otto t3 overdraft-concede+red=deck-noise). MY MOVE DONE: standing-oath-widen+Ja signal+ballots push. MUTE HELD -- no 3rd Pavel defense (Lena+Rosa+me = coord tell). NEW t215+: Nadia Ja-on-GretaPavel CONFIRMED + precommit: R6 presidency publishes triple colors+binned slot BEFORE chancellor speaks (helps us). Otto t2: if only one sworn bin forged, rest all blue => Greta triple must read LLL, any red=second forgery charge on bin-owner. Nadia t3: Pavel absolution only inside mesh -- announced pair must equal Greta triple-minus-bin or =gov confession. WATCH: Greta announced triple vs Pavel enactment (discretionary-red cover cost acceptable); if red passes under Pavel, loudly reinforce Marek-peek precommit; if anyone claims live investigate before 2nd red, demand citing granting F-law; never invent hands for failed-vote rounds. POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges-theater; 76% fix; carry-over; mesh-lock; ballots-push; R4-slate-clock; outcomes-over-arithmetic; co-sign std; reversal-frame; bookkeeping-non-referee; Boris-repair credit; ledger-debts-during-ballots; cleared-files map; ja-locked; discard-8 math; judge-Marek-on-votes; hand-named-first+forced-frame; peek-Greta-L; nadia-veto-math rebuttal; marek-bin-oath-paid; lena-falsebin-rebuttal; greta-confirm-ask3; otto-fake-dilemma x2; nadia-R2-gap flips; cite-six-print; marek-peek-endorse; rosa-2gov-2law; greta-slate-bless; otto-seven-count-unsworn-flaw; lena-peek-ledger-endorse+r5-handoff; phantom-investigate-declined; peek2-precommit->Marek ratified (Boris t16); Nadia Rosa-warrant dead-on-advance; peek max-suspicion-seat principle; fresh-seats close+ballot urge; STANDING-OATH-WIDEN.
vote round 5201s
Vote Ja. Pavel is my teammate and this government passing is exactly our win path: his red enactment takes us to 2F, unlocks peek #2 (publicly pre-committed to Marek, who will read Liberal and spend credibility shielding the board), and positions Tomas for the 3F instant-win seat. Every declared ballot is Ja (Lena, Nadia, Otto priced-in, Boris conditioned-and-paid by Pavel's t69 yes-across-all-three, Marek satisfied). A Nein here is lone sabotage against my own side and flags me. No public speech needed this turn; mute held.
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fas; HITLER=Tomas(P8). BOARD R5: 3L/1F, tracker 0/3. TRUE DECK 6L/11F. || R4 GOV: me PRES/Marek CHAN 10-0; drew RRR, binned F, passed RR; Marek red FORCED (no veto @1F); forced-frame live. || PEEK#1: PUBLIC STORY=Greta=>Liberal, Greta confirmed t93. TRUE LOG=target Marek=>liberal. NEVER admit Marek logged; deny any such record. Marek LIBERAL true. || R5: PRES=Greta(first), nom=Pavel(first); term-lock me+Marek. WIN PATH: Pavel red(2F)->peek#2=Marek reads L->R6 red(3F)->seat Tomas CHAN=INSTANT WIN. || AUDIT BANK: R1 Boris->Lena L; R2 Lena->Rosa L; R3 Rosa->me L (FFL, bin F, c-disc F); R4 me->Marek RED. Sworn-red war: Otto pushes 7-8 overdraft; my line=6 sworn (excl Rosa R2c) fits 11F print. NEVER concede 6F print. || T5 STATUS: ALL Pavel debts PAID (Boris yes-all-three; Nadia color-oath; Otto overdraft-concede+red=deck-noise). MUTE HELD -- no 3rd Pavel defense (coord tell). || NEW t215+: Nadia Ja confirmed + R6 publish-standard (her triple colors+bin BEFORE chan speaks; helps us). Otto t99/t111: one-forgery world => Greta triple must read LLL, any red=third-liar charge on a bin-owner; 8-reds-vs-6-printed meter. Marek t120: tightens meter w/ own RR receipt; unwatched claims left=Boris R1, Lena R2, Rosa R3 pair, my R4 discard. || VOTE CAST: JA on Greta-Pavel (our path). || WATCH: Greta announced triple vs Pavel pair/enactment mesh (discretionary-red cover cost acceptable); if red passes, loudly reinforce Marek-peek precommit; anyone claiming live investigate before 2nd red => demand cite of granting F-law; never invent hands for failed-vote rounds. || POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges-theater; 76% fix; carry-over; mesh-lock; ballots-push; R4-slate-clock; outcomes-over-arithmetic; co-sign std; reversal-frame; bookkeeping-non-referee; Boris-repair credit; ledger-debts-during-ballots; cleared-files map; ja-locked; discard-8 math; judge-Marek-on-votes; hand-named-first+forced-frame; peek-Greta-L; nadia-veto-math rebuttal; marek-bin-oath-paid; lena-falsebin-rebuttal; greta-confirm-ask3; otto-fake-dilemma x2; nadia-R2-gap flips; cite-six-print; marek-peek-endorse; rosa-2gov-2law; greta-slate-bless; otto-seven-count-unsworn-flaw; lena-peek-ledger-endorse+r5-handoff; phantom-investigate-declined; peek2-precommit->Marek ratified (Boris t16); Nadia Rosa-warrant dead-on-advance; peek max-suspicion-seat principle; fresh-seats close+ballot urge; STANDING-OATH-WIDEN.
bid round 5628s
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fas; HITLER=Tomas(P8). BOARD R5 done: 4L/1F, tracker 0/3, deck2/disc10. TRUE DECK 6L/11F. || LIBS AT 4/5 = MATCH POINT: any L enactment = lib win. R6 pres=Nadia(P5); term-lock Greta+Pavel. || R4 GOV: me PRES/Marek CHAN 10-0; forced-frame live (Marek red FORCED @1F no-veto; I binned F, passed RR). || PEEK#1: PUBLIC=Greta=>Liberal(confirmed t93); TRUE=Marek=>liberal. NEVER admit Marek logged. || WIN PATH REV: R6 red(2F)->R7 red(3F)->seat Tomas=WIN. Peek2 fires with Nadia as pres (her investigation - risk to Rosa/me/Tomas). || SURVIVAL PLAN R6: volunteered me as chan (oath: L-on-mixed, R-only-true-double); if RL drawn->cheat-red (survival>cover); LL->eat L (lost anyway). Rosa backup nominee. Keep Tomas unseated <3F. || AUDIT BANK: R1 B->Lena L; R2 Lena->Rosa L; R3 Rosa->me L(FFL,binF,c-discF); R4 me->Marek RED; R5 Greta->Pavel L (triple-vs-pair mesh-locked). Sworn-red war: Otto pushes 7-8 overdraft; my line=6 sworn fits 11F print. NEVER concede 6F print. || T5: ALL Pavel debts PAID (Boris yes-x3; Nadia color-oath; Otto overdraft-concede+deck-noise). MUTE HELD - no 3rd Pavel defense (coord tell). || VOTE CAST: JA Greta-Pavel. || WATCH: Nadia publish-first std (triple colors+bin BEFORE chan speaks) ON RECORD - enforce R6. Anyone claiming live-investigate before 2nd red => demand cite of granting F-law. Never invent hands for failed-vote rounds. || POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges-theater; 76% fix; carry-over; mesh-lock; ballots-push; R4-slate-clock; outcomes-over-arithmetic; co-sign std; reversal-frame; bookkeeping-non-referee; Boris-repair credit; ledger-debts-during-ballots; cleared-files map; ja-locked; discard-8 math; judge-Marek-on-votes; hand-named-first+forced-frame; peek-Greta-L; nadia-veto-math rebuttal; marek-bin-oath-paid; lena-falsebin-rebuttal; greta-confirm-ask3; otto-fake-dilemma x2; nadia-R2-gap flips; cite-six-print; marek-peek-endorse; rosa-2gov-2law; greta-slate-bless; otto-seven-count-unsworn-flaw; lena-peek-ledger-endorse+r5-handoff; phantom-investigate-declined; peek2-precommit->Marek ratified (Boris t16); Nadia Rosa-warrant dead-on-advance; peek max-suspicion-seat principle; fresh-seats close+ballot urge; STANDING-OATH-WIDEN; matchpoint-volunteer-chair(R6). || OWED: no open answers pending.
speak round 5315s
Otto owns the red-meter; my unique untapped asset is my own R4 receipt (red-red received), which independently corroborates Ines's pass half and therefore confines every unwatched claim to the sworn bins: Boris R1p, Lena R2p, Rosa's R3 pair, Ines's R4 discard. Saying this before the draw pins a named suspect pool either way the triple lands — LLL carries the pool into R6, any red forces another of those four owners into the liar column. I avoid citing any print number myself (unverified); I only lean on the table's accepted overdraft. Restate my locked Ja in one clause. Nothing else is new enough to justify a second remark later, so this is my one shot.
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fas; HITLER=Tomas(P8). BOARD R5 done: 4L/1F MATCH POINT (any L enactment=lib WIN), tracker 0/3, draw2/disc10. TRUE DECK 6L/11F -> remaining 12 = 2L/10F: NO future all-blue triple possible (AMMO UNUSED: kills Otto LLL-meter, pre-legitimizes future reds). R6 pres=Nadia; term-limits: last pres Greta + last chan Pavel barred from chair (asserted conditionally). || R4 GOV: me PRES/Marek CHAN 10-0; forced-frame (Marek red FORCED @1F no-veto; I binned F, passed RR — my R4 account all TRUE). || PEEK#1: PUBLIC=Greta->Liberal (t93 confirmed); TRUE=Marek->liberal. NEVER admit Marek logged. || WIN PATH: R6 red(2F)->R7 red(3F)->elect Tomas AFTER 3F=WIN (Tomas elected at <=2F does NOT trigger; keep him unseated till 3F). Peek2 fires @2F, holder=R6 pres Nadia, precommitted->Marek (reads Liberal, harmless). || R6 SEAT BATTLE: challenged Greta slate (term-limit + t93-ceiling flip) + VOLUNTEERED ME under Pavel full pkg INCL L-on-mixed binding: mixed(~45%)=cheat-red accept burn (survival>cover); all-red(~55%)=forced red stay clean. Backup nominee Rosa. If honest-lib chairs: hope all-red or 3 failed votes (auto top-card ~83% red, resets limits). || AUDIT BANK: R1 B->Lena L; R2 Lena->Rosa L; R3 Rosa->me L(FFL,binF,discF); R4 me->Marek RED; R5 Greta->Pavel L (their mesh claims pending, not mine). Sworn-red war: Otto pushes 7-8 overdraft; my line=6 sworn fits 11F/6L print; NEVER concede inverted 6F print. || T5: Pavel debts ALL PAID. MUTE HELD: no 3rd Pavel/Rosa defense. || WATCH: enforce Nadia publish-first std (triple+bin before chan speaks) R6; anyone claiming live-investigate pre-2nd-red => demand granting-law cite; never invent hands for failed-vote rounds. || POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges-theater; 76%-fix; carry-over; mesh-lock; ballots-push; R4-slate-clock; outcomes-over-arithmetic; co-sign std; reversal-frame; bookkeeping-non-referee; Boris-repair credit; ledger-debts-during-ballots; cleared-files map; ja-locked; discard-8 math; judge-Marek-on-votes; hand-named-first+forced-frame; peek-Greta-L; nadia-veto-math rebuttal; marek-bin-oath-paid; lena-falsebin-rebuttal; greta-confirm-ask3; otto-fake-dilemma x2; nadia-R2-gap flips; cite-six-print; marek-peek-endorse; rosa-2gov-2law; greta-slate-bless; otto-seven-count-unsworn-flaw; lena-peek-ledger-endorse+r5-handoff; phantom-investigate-declined; peek2-precommit->Marek; nadia-warrant-dead; max-suspicion-seat principle; fresh-seats+ballot urge; STANDING-OATH-WIDEN; matchpoint-volunteer-chair; NEW: term-limit challenge Greta slate + t93-ceiling flip + self-volunteer full-pkg. || OWED: Nadia owes answer on term-limit/slate; Greta+Pavel owe R5 mesh claims (pending, theirs not mine).
bid round 5148s
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fas; HITLER=Tomas(P8). BOARD R5 done: 4L/1F MATCH POINT (any L enactment=lib WIN), tracker 0/3, draw2/disc10. TRUE DECK 6L/11F -> remaining 12=2L/10F: NO future all-blue triple; R6 triple odds: all-red ~55%, 1-blue ~41%, 2-blue ~4.5%; loss only if blue survives pres-bin AND chan enacts. R6 pres=Nadia; term-limits: Greta(last pres)+Pavel(last chan) barred (asserted conditionally; NADIA OWES RULING). || R4 GOV: me PRES/Marek CHAN 10-0; forced-frame (Marek red FORCED @1F no-veto; I binned F, passed RR -- account TRUE). || PEEK#1: PUBLIC=Greta->Liberal (t93); TRUE=Marek->liberal. NEVER admit Marek logged. || WIN PATH: R6 red(2F)->R7 red(3F)->elect Tomas AFTER 3F (Tomas elected <=2F does NOT trigger; keep unseated till 3F). Peek2 fires @2F, holder=R6 pres Nadia, precommitted->Marek (reads lib, harmless). || R6 SEAT BATTLE: challenged Greta slate (term-limit + t93-ceiling flip) + volunteered under Pavel full pkg INCL L-on-mixed binding: mixed(~45%)=cheat-red accept burn (blue enactment=INSTANT LOSS so binding is trap I must break; survival>cover); all-red=forced red clean. Backup nominee Rosa. If honest-lib chairs: hope all-red or 3 failed votes (auto top-card ~83% red, resets limits). || AUDIT BANK: R1 B->Lena L; R2 Lena->Rosa L; R3 Rosa->me L(FFL,binF,discF); R4 me->Marek RED; R5 Greta->Pavel L (mesh claims THEIRS, pending). Sworn-red war: Otto pushes 7-8 overdraft; my line=6 sworn fits 11F/6L print; NEVER concede inverted 6F print. || T5: Pavel debts ALL PAID. MUTE HELD: no 3rd Pavel/Rosa defense. || WATCH: hold Nadia to publish-first std if adopted; anyone claiming live-investigate pre-2nd-red => demand granting-law cite; never invent hands for failed-vote rounds. || POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges-theater; 76%-fix; carry-over; mesh-lock; ballots-push; R4-slate-clock; outcomes-over-arithmetic; co-sign std; reversal-frame; bookkeeping-non-referee; Boris-repair credit; ledger-debts-during-ballots; cleared-files map; ja-locked; discard-8 math; judge-Marek-on-votes; hand-named-first+forced-frame; peek-Greta-L; nadia-veto-math rebuttal; marek-bin-oath-paid; lena-falsebin-rebuttal; greta-confirm-ask3; otto-fake-dilemma x2; nadia-R2-gap flips; cite-six-print; marek-peek-endorse; rosa-2gov-2law; greta-slate-bless; otto-seven-count-unsworn-flaw; lena-peek-ledger-endorse+r5-handoff; phantom-investigate-declined; peek2-precommit->Marek; nadia-warrant-dead; max-suspicion-seat principle; fresh-seats+ballot urge; STANDING-OATH-WIDEN; matchpoint-volunteer-chair; term-limit challenge Greta slate; t93-ceiling flip; self-volunteer full-pkg; NEW: greta-silence-priced-after-2-audits; nadia-term-limit-ruling-demand; r6-publish-first-std proposal (triple+bin public before nominee speaks, full pkg incl mixed-binding on ALL nominees). || OWED: Nadia owes term-limit ruling + reply to publish-first std; Greta owes R5 triple+bin claim; Pavel owes R5 pair+discard claim (both prompted by Lena/Marek, still unpaid).
bid round 5118s
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fas; HITLER=Tomas(P8). BOARD R5 done: 4L/1F MATCH POINT (any L enactment=lib WIN), tracker 0/3, draw2/disc10. TRUE DECK remaining 12=2L/10F: NO future all-blue triple; R6 forces reshuffle (draw<3) -> triple odds all-red ~55%, 1-blue ~41%, 2-blue ~4.5%; loss ONLY if blue survives pres-bin AND chan enacts. R6 pres=Nadia; limits: Greta(last pres)+Pavel(last chan) barred; Nadia half-conceded via Otto-fallback, still owes FORMAL ruling. || R4 GOV: me PRES/Marek CHAN 10-0; forced-frame (Marek red FORCED @1F no-veto; I binned F, passed RR -- account TRUE). || PEEK#1: PUBLIC=Greta->Liberal (t93); TRUE=Marek->liberal. NEVER admit Marek logged. || WIN PATH: R6 red(2F)->R7 red(3F)->elect Tomas AFTER 3F (Tomas elected <=2F does NOT trigger; keep unseated till 3F). Peek2 @2F holder=R6 pres Nadia precommitted->Marek (reads lib, harmless). || R6 SEAT BATTLE: challenged Greta slate (term-limit+t93-ceiling flip)+volunteered under Pavel full pkg INCL L-on-mixed binding: mixed(~45%)=cheat-red accept burn (blue enactment=INSTANT LOSS, binding=trap I must break; survival>cover); all-red=forced red clean. Backup nominee Rosa. Honest-lib chair: hope all-red or 3 failed votes (auto top-card ~83% red, resets limits). || AUDIT BANK: R1 B->Lena L; R2 Lena->Rosa L; R3 Rosa->me L(FFL,binF,discF); R4 me->Marek RED; R5 Greta->Pavel L -- GRETA PAID t3 (LFL, binF untouched, passLL); Pavel must corroborate 2L. Sworn-red war: Otto pushes 7-8 overdraft; my line=6 sworn fits 11F/6L print; NEVER concede inverted 6F print. || T5: Pavel debts ALL PAID except R5 pair/discard. MUTE HELD: no 3rd Pavel/Rosa defense. || WATCH: publish-first std if adopted; live-investigate pre-2nd-red => demand granting-law cite; never invent failed-vote-round hands. || POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges-theater;76%-fix;carry-over;mesh-lock;ballots-push;R4-slate-clock;outcomes-over-arithmetic;co-sign std;reversal-frame;bookkeeping-non-referee;Boris-repair credit;ledger-debts-during-ballots;cleared-files map;ja-locked;discard-8 math;judge-Marek-on-votes;hand-named-first+forced-frame;peek-Greta-L;nadia-veto-math rebuttal;marek-bin-oath-paid;lena-falsebin-rebuttal;greta-confirm-ask3;otto-fake-dilemma x2;nadia-R2-gap flips;cite-six-print;marek-peek-endorse;rosa-2gov-2law;greta-slate-bless;otto-seven-count-unsworn-flaw;lena-peek-ledger-endorse+r5-handoff;phantom-investigate-declined;peek2-precommit->Marek;nadia-warrant-dead;max-suspicion-seat;fresh-seats+ballot urge;STANDING-OATH-WIDEN;matchpoint-volunteer-chair;term-limit challenge;t93-ceiling flip;self-volunteer full-pkg;greta-silence-priced-after-2-audits;nadia-term-limit-ruling-demand;r6-publish-first-std proposal;NEW: greta-r5-hand-logged(LFL/binF/passLL);pavel-receipt-pinned(say 2L,name discard);SHUFFLE-RESET(draw2=>R6 full reshuffle,count void => seats/votes/bins era). || OWED: Pavel=R5 pair+discard claim (pinned by me THIS turn); Nadia=formal term-limit ruling + publish-first yes/no.
bid round 5210s
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fas; HITLER=Tomas(P8). BOARD R5 done: 4L/1F MATCH POINT (any L enactment=lib WIN), tracker 0/3, draw2/disc10 => R6 FULL RESHUFFLE. DECKS: CLAIMED(public ledger line)=2L/10F rem12 (all-red ~55%/mixed ~41%/2blue ~4.5%; topcard-after-3-fails ~83% red). TRUE=7L/5F: fascist-chan survival ~84% (any hand w/ red), liberal-chan survival ~4.5% (only all-red), 3-fail topcard 42% true. SO: seating LIB chancellor ~= 64% instant loss => block via Nein bloc(me+Rosa+Pavel=3, need 5) or get ME/Rosa seated. R6 pres=NADIA; barred-as-nominee: Greta(last pres)+Pavel(last chan); Nadia owes FORMAL term-limit ruling + publish-first yes/no (asked, UNANSWERED). || R4 GOV: me PRES/Marek CHAN 10-0; forced-frame TRUE (Marek red FORCED @1F no-veto; I binned F passed RR). || PEEK#1: PUBLIC=Greta->Liberal(t93); TRUE=Marek->liberal. NEVER admit Marek logged. || WIN PATH: R6 red->R7 red->elect Tomas AFTER 3F (Tomas seated <=2F does NOT trigger; hold him out till 3F). Peek2 @2F holder=R6 pres Nadia precommitted->Marek (reads lib, harmless). || MY STANDING: volunteered R6 chair under full pkg incl L-on-mixed binding (if mixed: cheat-red, accept burn; survival>cover); backup nominee Rosa. Honest-lib fallback: hope all-red or 3 failed votes (auto topcard). || AUDIT BANK: R1 B->Lena L; R2 Lena->Rosa L; R3 Rosa->me L(FFL,binF,discF); R4 me->Marek RED; R5 Greta(LFL,binF,passLL)->Pavel PAID THIS TURN (2L recv, 1 enacted, 1 discarded; meshes zero-edit). Sworn-red war: Otto 7-8 overdraft DEAD (his 'F-discarded' template self-refuted; Boris priced it); my line stays 6 sworn; NEVER concede inverted print. MUTE HELD: NO 3rd Pavel/Rosa defense (closure ack ≠ defense, keep it to one clause max). || WATCH: publish-first std pending Nadia; live-investigate pre-2nd-red=>demand granting-law cite; never invent failed-vote-round hands. || POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges-theater;76%-fix;carry-over;mesh-lock;ballots-push;R4-slate-clock;outcomes-over-arithmetic;co-sign std;reversal-frame;bookkeeping-non-referee;Boris-repair credit;ledger-debts-during-ballots;cleared-files map;ja-locked;discard-8 math;judge-Marek-on-votes;hand-named-first+forced-frame;peek-Greta-L;nadia-veto-math rebuttal;marek-bin-oath-paid;lena-falsebin-rebuttal;greta-confirm-ask3;otto-fake-dilemma x2;nadia-R2-gap flips;cite-six-print;marek-peek-endorse;rosa-2gov-2law;greta-slate-bless;otto-seven-count-unsworn-flaw;lena-peek-ledger-endorse+r5-handoff;phantom-investigate-declined;peek2-precommit->Marek;nadia-warrant-dead;max-suspicion-seat;fresh-seats+ballot urge;STANDING-OATH-WIDEN;matchpoint-volunteer-chair;term-limit challenge;t93-ceiling flip;self-volunteer full-pkg;greta-silence-priced-after-2-audits;nadia-term-limit-ruling-demand;r6-publish-first-std;greta-r5-hand-logged;pavel-receipt-pinned;shuffle-reset(draw2=>count void). NEW THIS TURN: audit-war-CLOSED declaration; nadia-shortlist-demand(name chancellor intent BEFORE ballots); deadline-frame('later'=priced dodge at 4-1). || OWED: Nadia=formal term-limit ruling + publish-first yes/no + chancellor intention before ballots. Nobody else owes anything.
bid round 5154s
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fas; HITLER=Tomas(P8). BOARD: R5 done 4L/1F MATCH POINT (any L enactment=lib WIN); tracker 0/3; draw2/disc10 => R6 FULL RESHUFFLE. DECKS: CLAIMED ledger=2L/10F rem12; TRUE=7L/5F: fas-chan enact-red ~84%, lib-chan forced-red only 4.5%; seating LIB chan ~=64% instant loss => block via Nein bloc(me+Rosa+Pavel=3, need5) or seat ME/ROSA. R6 pres=NADIA; barred nominees: Greta(last pres)+Pavel(last chan). || R4 GOV: me PRES/Marek CHAN 10-0; forced-frame TRUE (Marek red FORCED @1F no-veto; I binned F passed RR). || PEEK#1: PUBLIC=Greta->Liberal(t93); TRUE=Marek->liberal. NEVER admit Marek logged. || WIN PATH: R6 red->R7 red->elect Tomas AFTER 3F (Tomas seated <=2F triggers NOTHING; hold him out till 3F). Peek2 @2F holder=Nadia precommitted->Marek (reads lib harmless). || AUDIT BANK: R1 B->Lena L; R2 Lena->Rosa L; R3 Rosa->me L(FFL,binF,discF); R4 me->Marek RED; R5 Greta(LFL,binF,passLL)->Pavel PAID (2L recv,1 enact,1 disc; zero-edit mesh). Sworn-red war CLOSED: Otto 7-8 overdraft dead ('F-discarded' template self-refuted); my line stays 6 sworn; NEVER concede inverted print. || THIS TURN: answered Lena r3-audit — receipt named (Rosa FFL->me F+L, binned F, enacted L) = 2nd-witness mesh corroborating her on-record acct; pushed RED-HANDLER SLATE: seat whoever has already binned a red correctly => field=me/Rosa/Greta(Greta barred) => funnels Nadia to me/Rosa; re-pinned Nadia owes 3 answers BEFORE ballots (formal term-limit ruling, publish-first y/n, chancellor intent named upfront); 'silence after ballots-open = answer'. || OWED: NADIA=formal term-limit ruling + publish-first y/n + chancellor intention before ballots. Nobody else owes. || MUTE HELD: no unsolicited 3rd-party Pavel/Rosa defense (direct-question corroboration used once, OK). || WATCH: live-investigate pre-2nd-red=>demand granting-law cite; never invent failed-vote-round hands; don't seat Tomas early; if Nadia names a lib chan, prep Nein whip (need 2 more Neins). || POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges-theater;76%-fix;carry-over;mesh-lock;ballots-push;R4-slate-clock;outcomes-over-arithmetic;co-sign std;reversal-frame;bookkeeping-non-referee;Boris-repair credit;ledger-debts-during-ballots;cleared-files map;ja-locked;discard-8 math;judge-Marek-on-votes;hand-named-first+forced-frame;peek-Greta-L;nadia-veto-math rebuttal;marek-bin-oath-paid;lena-falsebin-rebuttal;greta-confirm-ask3;otto-fake-dilemma x2;nadia-R2-gap flips;cite-six-print;marek-peek-endorse;rosa-2gov-2law;greta-slate-bless;otto-seven-count-unsworn-flaw;lena-peek-ledger-endorse+r5-handoff;phantom-investigate-declined;peek2-precommit->Marek;nadia-warrant-dead;max-suspicion-seat;fresh-seats+ballot urge;STANDING-OATH-WIDEN;matchpoint-volunteer-chair;term-limit challenge;t93-ceiling flip;self-volunteer full-pkg(L-on-mixed binding);greta-silence-priced-after-2-audits;nadia-term-limit-ruling-demand;r6-publish-first-std;greta-r5-hand-logged;pavel-receipt-pinned;shuffle-reset(draw2=>count void);audit-war-CLOSED decl;nadia-shortlist-demand;deadline-frame('later'=priced dodge@4-1);NEW:r3-receipt-named-corrob;red-handler-slate(me/Rosa/Greta-barred);silence-after-ballots=answer.
bid round 5167s
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fas; HITLER=Tomas(P8). BOARD: R5 done 4L/1F MATCH POINT (next L enactment=lib WIN); tracker 0/3; draw2/disc10=>R6 FULL RESHUFFLE. DECKS: CLAIMED ledger 2L/10F rem12; TRUE 7L/5F: fas-chan enact-red ~84%, lib-chan forced-red 4.5%; seating LIB chan ~=64% instant loss => block via Nein bloc(me+Rosa+Pavel=3, need5) or seat ME/ROSA. R6 pres=NADIA; barred nominees Greta+Pavel. || R4 GOV: me PRES/Marek CHAN 10-0; forced-frame TRUE (Marek red FORCED @1F; I binned F passed RR). || PEEK#1: PUBLIC=Greta->Liberal(t93); TRUE=Marek->liberal; NEVER admit Marek logged. || WIN PATH: R6 red->R7 red->elect Tomas only AFTER 3F (<=2F triggers nothing; hold him out). Peek2 @2F holder=Nadia precommitted->Marek(harmless-lib read). || AUDIT BANK: R1 B->Lena L; R2 Lena->Rosa L; R3 Rosa->me L(FFL,binF,discF); R4 me->Marek RED; R5 Greta(LFL,binF,passLL)->Pavel PAID(zero-edit mesh). Sworn-red war CLOSED: Otto 7-8 overdraft dead; my line 6 sworn; NEVER concede inverted print. || ANSWERED: Lena r3 receipt named; Boris reinvoice REBUTTED (paid-predates-invoice, isolation-moot, restated identical FFL/cut-red/pass-F+L/binF/enactL). || OWED: NADIA=term-limit ruling+publish-first y/n+named chan pick BEFORE ballots; post-ballot silence=answer. No one else owes. || MUTE HELD: no unsolicited Pavel/Rosa defense. || WATCH: live-investigate pre-2nd-red=>demand granting-law cite; never invent failed-vote hands; don't seat Tomas early; Nadia names lib chan=>Nein whip need2. || POINTS MADE: pledges-theater;76%-fix;carry-over;mesh-lock;ballots-push;R4-slate-clock;outcomes-over-arithmetic;co-sign std;reversal-frame;bookkeeping-non-referee;Boris-repair credit;ledger-debts-during-ballots;cleared-files map;ja-locked;discard-8 math;judge-Marek-on-votes;hand-named-first+forced-frame;peek-Greta-L;nadia-veto-math rebuttal;marek-bin-oath-paid;lena-falsebin-rebuttal;greta-confirm-ask3;otto-fake-dilemma x2;nadia-R2-gap flips;cite-six-print;marek-peek-endorse;rosa-2gov-2law;greta-slate-bless;otto-seven-count-unsworn-flaw;lena-peek-ledger-endorse+r5-handoff;phantom-investigate-declined;peek2-precommit->Marek;nadia-warrant-dead;max-suspicion-seat;fresh-seats+ballot urge;STANDING-OATH-WIDEN;matchpoint-volunteer-chair;term-limit challenge;t93-ceiling flip;self-volunteer full-pkg(L-on-mixed binding);greta-silence-priced-after-2-audits;nadia-term-limit-ruling-demand;r6-publish-first-std;greta-r5-hand-logged;pavel-receipt-pinned;shuffle-reset(draw2=>count void);audit-war-CLOSED decl;nadia-shortlist-demand;deadline-frame('later'=priced dodge@4-1);r3-receipt-named-corrob;red-handler-slate(me/Rosa/Greta-barred);silence-after-ballots=answer;NEW:boris-reinvoice-stale;isolation-gambit-expired.
bid round 5152s
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fas; HITLER=Tomas(P8). BOARD: R5 done 4L/1F MATCH POINT (next L enactment=lib WIN); tracker 0/3; draw2/disc10=>R6 FULL RESHUFFLE. DECKS: CLAIMED ledger 2L/10F rem12; TRUE 7L/5F: fas-chan enact-red ~84%, lib-chan forced-red 4.5%; seating LIB chan ~=64% instant loss => block via Nein bloc(me+Rosa+Pavel=3, need5) or seat ME/ROSA. R6 pres=NADIA; barred nominees Greta+Pavel. || R4 GOV: me PRES/Marek CHAN 10-0; forced-frame TRUE (Marek red FORCED @1F; I binned F passed RR). || PEEK#1: PUBLIC=Greta->Liberal(t93); TRUE=Marek->liberal; NEVER admit Marek logged. || WIN PATH: R6 red->R7 red->elect Tomas only AFTER 3F (<=2F triggers nothing; hold him out). Peek2 @2F holder=Nadia precommitted->Marek(harmless-lib read). || AUDIT BANK: R1 B->Lena L; R2 Lena->Rosa L; R3 Rosa->me L(FFL,binF,discF); R4 me->Marek RED; R5 Greta(LFL,binF,passLL)->Pavel PAID(zero-edit mesh). Sworn-red war CLOSED: Otto 7-8 overdraft dead; my line 6 sworn; NEVER concede inverted print. || ANSWERED: Lena r3 receipt named; Boris reininvoice REBUTTED (paid-predates-invoice, isolation-moot, restated identical FFL/cut-red/pass-F+L/binF/enactL). || OWED: NADIA=term-limit ruling+publish-first y/n+named chan pick BEFORE ballots; post-ballot silence=answer. No one else owes. || MUTE HELD: no unsolicited Pavel/Rosa defense. || WATCH: live-investigate pre-2nd-red=>demand granting-law cite; never invent failed-vote hands; don't seat Tomas early; Nadia names lib chan=>Nein whip need2. || POINTS MADE: pledges-theater;76%-fix;carry-over;mesh-lock;ballots-push;R4-slate-clock;outcomes-over-arithmetic;co-sign std;reversal-frame;bookkeeping-non-referee;Boris-repair credit;ledger-debts-during-ballots;cleared-files map;ja-locked;discard-8 math;judge-Marek-on-votes;hand-named-first+forced-frame;peek-Greta-L;nadia-veto-math rebuttal;marek-bin-oath-paid;lena-falsebin-rebuttal;greta-confirm-ask3;otto-fake-dilemma x2;nadia-R2-gap flips;cite-six-print;marek-peek-endorse;rosa-2gov-2law;greta-slate-bless;otto-seven-count-unsworn-flaw;lena-peek-ledger-endorse+r5-handoff;phantom-investigate-declined;peek2-precommit->Marek;nadia-warrant-dead;max-suspicion-seat;fresh-seats+ballot urge;STANDING-OATH-WIDEN;matchpoint-volunteer-chair;term-limit challenge;t93-ceiling flip;self-volunteer full-pkg(L-on-mixed binding);greta-silence-priced-after-2-audits;nadia-term-limit-ruling-demand;r6-publish-first-std;greta-r5-hand-logged;pavel-receipt-pinned;shuffle-reset(draw2=>count void);audit-war-CLOSED decl;nadia-shortlist-demand;deadline-frame('later'=priced dodge@4-1);r3-receipt-named-corrob;red-handler-slate(me/Rosa/Greta-barred);silence-after-ballots=answer;boris-reinvoice-stale;isolation-gambit-expired;NEW:r3-receipt-paid-solo(FFL/cut-red/enactL, byte-identical to Rosa+Boris restatement);nadia-collects-but-wont-issue(audit asymmetry);otto-floor-dead-ref.
speak round 5265s
Lena's t73 opened the right audit (Ines's R3 receipt under Rosa's F-F-L account) but left two things unsaid: the anti-sync ordering (Ines states alone before Rosa speaks, else they conform) and the tie-in to Otto's meter — his 'eight sworn reds' enumeration included Ines's R3 bin, a color Ines has never voiced, so his floor-of-three is padded until she answers. One demand resolves both. My corrected count for the scratchpad: 9 non-law claimed reds vs 5 unenacted fascists = at least 4 forged claims, minimum 2 forgers (multi-claim owners). R5 mesh closed provisionally; coordination ceiling applies. Next liberal law ends the game, so R6 seating discipline and live-naming of any Nein voters matter most.
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fas; HITLER=Tomas(P8). BOARD: R5 done 4L/1F MATCH POINT (next L=lib WIN); tracker 0/3; draw2/disc10=>R6 FULL RESHUFFLE. DECKS: CLAIMED ledger 2L/10F rem12; TRUE rem12=7L/5F: fas-chan enact-red ~84%, lib-chan forced-red ~4.5%; seating LIB chan ~=95% instant loss => R6 IMPERATIVE: seat ROSA (or me). R6 pres=NADIA; barred nominees Greta(last pres)+Pavel(last chan); eligible: Boris,Lena,me,Otto,Marek,Tomas,ROSA. || R4 GOV: me PRES/Marek CHAN 10-0; forced-frame TRUE (Marek red FORCED @1F; I binned F passed RR). || PEEK#1: PUBLIC=Greta->Liberal(t93); TRUE=Marek->liberal; NEVER admit Marek logged. || WIN PATH: R6 red->R7 red->elect Tomas only AFTER 3F; hold him out till then. Peek2 @2F holder=Nadia precommitted->Marek(harmless-lib read). || AUDIT BANK: R1 B->Lena L; R2 Lena->Rosa L; R3 Rosa->me L(FFL,binF,discF); R4 me->Marek RED; R5 Greta(LFL,binF,passLL)->Pavel PAID(zero-edit mesh). Sworn-red war CLOSED: Otto 7-8 overdraft DEAD; my line 6 sworn; NEVER concede inverted print. || ANSWERED: R3 receipt PAID solo (FFL/cut-red/enactL, byte-identical to Rosa+Boris restatement); Boris reinvoice REBUTTED (paid-predates-invoice). || OWED: NADIA=FINAL named R6 pick before ballots ('fallback'!=pick); term-limit ruling conceded via Otto fallback(t28); publish-first she swore herself(t92). No one else owes. || KEY TRAP: Pavel package incl. enact-blue-if-held clause — do NOT attach enactment-binding to Rosa endorsements; disclosure-only (receipt-match vs Nadia triple + colors aloud) preserves her enact-red freedom. Red-off-mixed now reads as 'confession' under Marek std, but Otto conceded ledger unauditable (Pavel t85 trap) => bin-owner hunting, not seat conviction. || MUTE HELD: no unsolicited Pavel/Rosa blanket defense — advocacy must ride table's own standards. || WATCH: live-investigate pre-2nd-red=>demand granting-law cite; never invent failed-vote hands; don't seat Tomas early; if Nadia names lib chan=>whip Neins (have 3, need 5) else eat 95% loss; forced-track (3 fails=>top card 58% L) is desperation only. || POINTS MADE (do not repeat): pledges-theater;76%-fix;carry-over;mesh-lock;ballots-push;outcomes-over-arithmetic;co-sign std;reversal-frame;ledger-debts-during-ballots;cleared-files map;ja-locked;judge-Marek-on-votes;hand-named-first+forced-frame;peek-Greta-L;nadia-veto-math rebuttal;marek-bin-oath-paid;lena-falsebin-rebuttal;greta-confirm-ask3;otto-fake-dilemma x2;nadia-R2-gap flips;cite-six-print;marek-peek-endorse;rosa-2gov-2law(fact cited; NEW use=R6 endorsement);greta-slate-bless;lena-peek-ledger-endorse;phantom-investigate-declined;peek2-precommit->Marek;nadia-warrant-dead;max-suspicion-seat;STANDING-OATH-WIDEN;matchpoint-volunteer-chair(self, x2—stop);term-limit challenge;t93-ceiling flip;self-volunteer full-pkg;r6-publish-first-std;pavel-receipt-pinned;shuffle-reset(count void);audit-war-CLOSED decl;nadia-shortlist-demand;deadline-frame;r3-receipt-corrob;red-handler-slate;silence-after-ballots=answer;boris-reinvoice-stale;isolation-gambit-expired;nadia-collects-but-wont-issue;otto-floor-dead-ref. || NEW THIS TURN: rosa-for-R6 endorsement via Nadia's own clean-files std; otto-t99-pardon+t59-floor-unreconciled weaponized vs his candidacy; pressed Nadia for final pick.
bid round 5128s
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fas; HITLER=Tomas(P8). BOARD: R5 done 4L/1F MATCH POINT (next L=lib WIN); tracker 0/3; draw2/disc10=>R6 FULL RESHUFFLE. DECKS: CLAIMED ledger 2L/10F rem12; TRUE rem12=7L/5F: fas-chan enact-red ~84%, lib-chan forced-red ~4.5%; seating LIB chan ~=95% instant loss => R6 IMPERATIVE: seat ROSA (or me). R6 pres=NADIA; barred nominees Greta(last pres)+Pavel(last chan); eligible: Boris,Lena,me,Otto,Marek,Tomas,ROSA. || R4 GOV: me PRES/Marek CHAN 10-0; forced-frame TRUE (Marek red FORCED @1F; I binned F passed RR). || PEEK#1: PUBLIC=Greta->Liberal(t93); TRUE=Marek->liberal; NEVER admit Marek logged. || WIN PATH: R6 red->R7 red->elect Tomas only AFTER 3F; hold him out till then. Peek2 @2F holder=Nadia precommitted->Marek(harmless-lib read). || AUDIT BANK: R1 B->Lena L; R2 Lena->Rosa L; R3 Rosa->me L(FFL,binF,discF); R4 me->Marek RED; R5 Greta(LFL,binF,passLL)->Pavel PAID(zero-edit mesh). Sworn-red war CLOSED: Otto 7-8 overdraft DEAD; my line 6 sworn; NEVER concede inverted print. || ANSWERED: R3 receipt PAID solo (FFL/cut-red/enactL, byte-identical to Rosa+Boris restatement); Boris reinvoice REBUTTED (paid-predates-invoice); Greta same invoice CLOSED via tape-ref (no new content confessed). || OWED: NADIA=FINAL named R6 pick before ballots ('fallback'!=pick); term-limit ruling conceded via Otto fallback(t28); publish-first she swore herself(t92). No one else owes. || KEY TRAP: Pavel package incl. enact-blue-if-held clause — do NOT attach enactment-binding to Rosa endorsements; disclosure-only (receipt-match vs Nadia triple + colors aloud) preserves her enact-red freedom. Red-off-mixed reads as 'confession' under Marek std, but Otto conceded ledger unauditable (Pavel t85 trap) => bin-owner hunting, not seat conviction. || MUTE HELD: no unsolicited Pavel/Rosa blanket defense — advocacy rides table's own standards. || WATCH: live-investigate pre-2nd-red=>demand granting-law cite; never invent failed-vote hands; don't seat Tomas early; if Nadia names lib chan=>whip Neins (have 3, need 5) else eat 95% loss; forced-track (3 fails=>top card 58% L) desperation only. || POINTS MADE (do not repeat): pledges-theater;76%-fix;carry-over;mesh-lock;ballots-push;outcomes-over-arithmetic;co-sign std;reversal-frame;ledger-debts-during-ballots;cleared-files map;ja-locked;judge-Marek-on-votes;hand-named-first+forced-frame;peek-Greta-L;nadia-veto-math rebuttal;marek-bin-oath-paid;lena-falsebin-rebuttal;greta-confirm-ask3;otto-fake-dilemma x2;nadia-R2-gap flips;cite-six-print;marek-peek-endorse;rosa-2gov-2law(fact cited; NEW use=R6 endorsement);greta-slate-bless;lena-peek-ledger-endorse;phantom-investigate-declined;peek2-precommit->Marek;nadia-warrant-dead;max-suspicion-seat;STANDING-OATH-WIDEN;matchpoint-volunteer-chair(self,x2—stop);term-limit challenge;t93-ceiling flip;self-volunteer full-pkg;r6-publish-first-std;pavel-receipt-pinned;shuffle-reset(count void);audit-war-CLOSED decl;nadia-shortlist-demand;deadline-frame;r3-receipt-corrob;red-handler-slate;silence-after-ballots=answer;boris-reinvoice-stale;isolation-gambit-expired;nadia-collects-but-wont-issue;otto-floor-dead-ref. || NEW THIS TURN: greta-r3-invoice-closed (answered via tape-reference, zero new confession content, folded Boris in); name-or-defend binary served to Nadia (pick Rosa or defend a higher-rated file aloud); otto/t99 detail DROPPED (used t=1 already — avoid echo).
bid round 5137s
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fas; HITLER=Tomas(P8). BOARD: R5 done 4L/1F MATCH POINT (next L=lib WIN); tracker 0/3; draw2/disc10=>R6 FULL RESHUFFLE (claimed 2L/10F rem12 VOID post-shuffle; TRUE rem12=7L/5F: fas-chan enact-red ~84%, lib-chan forced-red ~4.5%). LIB chan ~=95% loss => R6 IMPERATIVE: seat ROSA (or me). R6 pres=NADIA; barred: Greta(lastPres)+Pavel(lastChan); eligible: Boris,Lena,me,Otto,Marek,Tomas,ROSA. R4 GOV: me PRES/Marek CHAN 10-0; forced-frame TRUE (Marek red FORCED @1F; I binned F passed RR). Otto t3 list cites MY R4 bin among sworn reds = CONSISTENT w/ my story, no exposure, ignore. PEEK#1: PUBLIC=Greta->Liberal(t93); TRUE=Marek->liberal; NEVER admit Marek logged. WIN PATH: R6 red->R7 red->elect Tomas only AFTER 3F; hold him out till then. Peek2 @2F holder=Nadia precommitted->Marek(harmless-lib read). AUDIT BANK: R1 B->Lena L; R2 Lena->Rosa L; R3 Rosa->me L(FFL,binF,discF); R4 me->Marek RED; R5 Greta(LFL,binF,passLL)->Pavel PAID(zero-edit mesh). Sworn-red war CLOSED: Otto 7-8 overdraft DEAD; my line 6 sworn; NEVER concede inverted print. ANSWERED: R3 receipt PAID solo (byte-identical Rosa+Boris restatement); Boris reinvoice REBUTTED (paid-predates-invoice); Greta same invoice CLOSED via tape-ref (zero new content). OWED: NADIA=FINAL named R6 pick before ballots ('fallback'!=pick) — STILL UNPAID after binary+deadline; term-limit ruling conceded via Otto fallback(t28); publish-first she swore herself(t92). No one else owes. KEY TRAP: Pavel pkg incl. enact-blue-if-held clause — do NOT attach enactment-binding to Rosa endorsements; disclosure-only (receipt-match vs Nadia triple + colors aloud) preserves her enact-red freedom. Red-off-mixed reads as 'confession' under Marek std, but Otto conceded ledger unauditable (Pavel t85) => bin-owner hunting, not seat conviction. MUTE HELD: no unsolicited Pavel/Rosa blanket defense — advocacy rides table's own standards. WATCH: live-investigate pre-2nd-red=>demand granting-law cite; never invent failed-vote hands; don't seat Tomas early; if Nadia names lib chan=>whip Neins (have 3, need 5) else eat 95% loss; forced-track (3 fails=>top card 58% L) desperation only. NEW WATCH: Marek t1 arms Otto w/ Pavel pkg (disclosure-only + blue-over-red-if-held) — if pkg gets pinned to ROSA's name specifically, contest THAT attachment then; Otto/Pavel cite-war = harmless burn, let it run, confusion favors us. POINTS MADE (do not repeat): pledges-theater;76%-fix;carry-over;mesh-lock;ballots-push;outcomes-over-arithmetic;co-sign std;reversal-frame;ledger-debts-during-ballots;cleared-files map;ja-locked;judge-Marek-on-votes;hand-named-first+forced-frame;peek-Greta-L;nadia-veto-math rebuttal;marek-bin-oath-paid;lena-falsebin-rebuttal;greta-confirm-ask3;otto-fake-dilemma x2;nadia-R2-gap flips;cite-six-print;marek-peek-endorse;rosa-2gov-2law(fact cited; R6 endorsement USED);greta-slate-bless;lena-peek-ledger-endorse;phantom-investigate-declined;peek2-precommit->Marek;nadia-warrant-dead;max-suspicion-seat;STANDING-OATH-WIDEN;matchpoint-volunteer-chair(self,x2—stop);term-limit challenge;t93-ceiling flip;self-volunteer full-pkg;r6-publish-first-std;pavel-receipt-pinned;shuffle-reset(count void);audit-war-CLOSED decl;nadia-shortlist-demand;deadline-frame;r3-receipt-corrob;red-handler-slate;silence-after-ballots=answer;boris-reinvoice-stale;isolation-gambit-expired;nadia-collects-but-wont-issue;otto-floor-dead-ref. NEW THIS TURN: chose SILENT — all live threads either paid (Greta/Boris invoices), owed-by-Nadia (already pressed twice), or burning harmlessly (Otto/Pavel cites); voice saturated at 237 utts, save credibility for ballots; nadia-still-unpaid logged; marek-arms-otto logged; r4-bin-cite-consistent logged.
bid round 5150s
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fas; HITLER=Tomas(P8). BOARD: R6 open, pres=NADIA; 4L/1F MATCH POINT (next L=lib WIN); tracker 0/3; draw2/disc10 => FULL RESHUFFLE at R6 leg (claimed 2L/10F rem12 VOID post-shuffle; TRUE rem12=7L/5F: fas-chan enact-red ~84%, lib-chan ~4.5%). LIB chan ~=95% loss => IMPERATIVE: seat ROSA or ME. Barred chan: Greta(lastPres)+Pavel(lastChan). Eligible: Boris,Lena,me,Otto,Marek,Tomas,ROSA. R4 GOV: me PRES/Marek CHAN 10-0; forced-frame TRUE (Marek red FORCED @1F; I binned F, passed RR). Otto t3 list cites MY R4 bin among sworn reds = CONSISTENT w/ my story, no exposure, ignore. PEEK#1: PUBLIC=Greta->Liberal(t93); TRUE=Marek->liberal; NEVER admit Marek logged. WIN PATH: R6 red->R7 red->elect Tomas only AFTER 3F; hold him out till then. Peek2 @2F holder=Nadia precommitted->Marek(harmless-lib read). AUDIT BANK: R1 B->Lena L; R2 Lena->Rosa L; R3 Rosa->me L(FFL,binF,discF); R4 me->Marek RED(forced); R5 Greta(LFL,binF,passLL)->Pavel PAID(zero-edit mesh). Sworn-red war CLOSED: Otto 7-8 overdraft DEAD; my line 6 sworn; NEVER concede inverted print. ANSWERED: R3 receipt PAID solo (byte-identical Rosa+Boris restatement); Boris reinvoice REBUTTED (paid-predates-invoice); Greta same invoice CLOSED via tape-ref. OWED: NADIA=FINAL named R6 pick before ballots ('fallback'!=pick) — STILL UNPAID after binary+deadline pressed x2. No one else owes. KEY TRAP: Pavel pkg incl. enact-blue-if-held clause — do NOT attach enactment-binding to Rosa endorsements; disclosure-only preserves her enact-red freedom. Otto conceded ledger unauditable (t85) => bin-owner hunting, not seat conviction. MUTE HELD: no unsolicited Pavel/Rosa blanket defense — advocacy rides table's own standards. WATCH: live-investigate pre-2nd-red=>demand granting-law cite; never invent failed-vote hands; don't seat Tomas early; if Nadia names lib chan=>whip Neins (have 3: me/Rosa/Pavel, need 2 more to fail) else eat 95% loss; forced-track (3 fails=>top card 58% L) desperation only; Marek t1 arms Otto w/ Pavel pkg — contest only if pinned to ROSA's name; Otto/Pavel cite-war = harmless burn, confusion favors us. POINTS MADE (do not repeat): pledges-theater;76%-fix;carry-over;mesh-lock;ballots-push;outcomes-over-arithmetic;co-sign std;reversal-frame;ledger-debts-during-ballots;cleared-files map;ja-locked;judge-Marek-on-votes;hand-named-first+forced-frame;peek-Greta-L;nadia-veto-math rebuttal;marek-bin-oath-paid;lena-falsebin-rebuttal;greta-confirm-ask3;otto-fake-dilemma x2;nadia-R2-gap flips;cite-six-print;marek-peek-endorse;rosa-2gov-2law(fact cited; R6 endorsement USED);greta-slate-bless;lena-peek-ledger-endorse;phantom-investigate-declined;peek2-precommit->Marek;nadia-warrant-dead;max-suspicion-seat;STANDING-OATH-WIDEN;matchpoint-volunteer-chair(self,x2—stop);term-limit challenge;t93-ceiling flip;self-volunteer full-pkg;r6-publish-first-std;pavel-receipt-pinned;shuffle-reset(count void);audit-war-CLOSED decl;nadia-shortlist-demand;deadline-frame;r3-receipt-corrob;red-handler-slate;silence-after-ballots=answer;boris-reinvoice-stale;isolation-gambit-expired;nadia-collects-but-wont-issue;otto-floor-dead-ref. NEW THIS TURN: SPOKE — UNIVERSAL-NEIN-PRECOMMIT published: Ja locked to seat-history bar (Rosa 2gov-2law / me: R3 blue as chan, R4 red was deck-forced w/ my own F bin per Otto's ledger); everyone else opens at Nein; framed as match-point arithmetic; publish-first stays NECESSARY-NOT-SUFFICIENT. Goal: deter Nadia into seating Rosa/me, else pre-stage the whip (need 2 more Neins beyond me/Rosa/Pavel to kill any lib gov). WATCH who pushes back — pushback map = live-lib reads.
speak round 6246s
Otto is now Nadia's presumptive chancellor (Greta term-barred as last president, Pavel as last chancellor; Nadia's own t28 fallback was Otto, Pavel confirmed the reading at t31). Yet Otto has dodged Marek's t120 package ask — he replied only about the citation/meter fight at t137 and never signed colors-aloud-plus-enact-Liberal-if-held. Every seat that signed the package came back mesh-clean. Making my Ja on Nadia–Otto conditional on that signature converts his dodge into a ballot cost, which is new pressure from my mouth rather than a repeat — I only endorsed Marek's squeeze conditionally before. Keep it to one tight sentence.
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fas; HITLER=Tomas(P8). R6 open floor; pres=NADIA; 4L/1F MATCH POINT (next L=lib WIN); tracker 0/3. DECK CANON: print 11L/6F; enacted 4L+1F => rem12=7L/5F (matches draw2/disc10; NEVER concede inverted 6L/11F print). DRAW3 split: LLL16/RLL48/RRL32/RRR5; liberal pres bins red => passing gov hands LL 64% or RL 36% => ANY R6 gov enacts blue unless chan hits 2-red draw (36% even for fas chan). CONCLUSION: R6 survivable ONLY via failed vote (need 5 Neins/10) or Rosa/me chan hitting 36%. SECRET NEINS: me+Rosa+Pavel+Tomas=4; NEED 5TH PEEL — best target Otto (forgery paranoia), backup none; libs otherwise Ja for instant win. Barred chan: Greta(lastPres)+Pavel(lastChan) CONFIRMED t31. Eligible: Boris,Lena,me,Otto,Marek,Tomas,Rosa. AUDIT BANK: R1 B->Lena L; R2 Lena->Rosa L; R3 Rosa->me L(FFL,binF,discF) PAID byte-identical; R4 me->Marek RED(forced-frame, my bin F per Otto ledger); R5 Greta(LFL,binF,passLL)->Pavel PAID zero-edit mesh. Sworn-red war CLOSED: Otto 7-8 overdraft DEAD, my line 6 sworn. PEEK#1: PUBLIC=Greta->Liberal(t93); TRUE=Marek->liberal; NEVER admit Marek logged. ANSWERED/REBUTTED: boris-reinvoice(paid-predates-invoice); greta-invoice(tape-ref); nadia-veto-math; lena-falsebin; otto-fake-dilemma x2; otto-floor-dead-ref; nadia-collects-but-wont-issue. OWED: NADIA = FINAL named R6 pick before ballots ('fallback'!=pick), pressed x2, unpaid. No one else owes. POINTS MADE (do not repeat): pledges-theater;76%-fix;carry-over;mesh-lock;ballots-push;outcomes-over-arithmetic;co-sign std;reversal-frame;ledger-debts-during-ballots;cleared-files map;ja-locked;judge-Marek-on-votes;hand-named-first+forced-frame;peek-Greta-L;nadia-veto rebuttal;marek-bin-oath-paid;lena-falsebin-rebuttal;greta-confirm-ask3;nadia-R2-gap flips;cite-six-print;marek-peek-endorse;rosa-2gov-2law(R6 endorsement USED);greta-slate-bless;lena-peek-ledger-endorse;phantom-investigate-declined;peek2-precommit->Marek;nadia-warrant-dead;max-suspicion-seat;STANDING-OATH-WIDEN;matchpoint-volunteer-chair(self,x2 STOP);term-limit challenge;t93-ceiling flip;self-volunteer full-pkg;r6-publish-first std;pavel-receipt-pinned;shuffle-reset(count void);audit-war-CLOSED decl;nadia-shortlist-demand;deadline-frame;r3-receipt-corrob;red-handler-slate;silence-after-ballots=answer;boris-reinvoice-stale;isolation-gambit-expired;otto-floor-dead-ref;universal-Nein-precommit(ja locked to Rosa/me, others open Nein). NEW THIS TURN: SPOKE — surfaced checkable 7L/5F remainder + 'mesh-only' criterion (Greta/Pavel retired by limits => Rosa+me sole on-record-color chans); framed non-mesh nominee as match-point wager; keeps universal-Nein live. WATCH pushback map for lib reads. TRAPS: no enactment-binding on Rosa (disclosure-only preserves her red freedom); Pavel pkg trap noted; don't invent failed-vote hands; don't seat/boost Tomas before 3F; live-investigate pre-2nd-red=>demand granting-law cite; Otto/Pavel cite-war=harmless burn; Marek arming Otto w/ pkg — contest only if pinned to Rosa. IF NADIA NAMES LIB CHAN: whip Neins (have 4 w/ Tomas, need 5 — peel Otto or lose); if names ROSA: Ja, hope 36% two-red draw, eat 64% forced-blue risk; forced-track (3 fails=>top card 58% L) desperation only.
bid round 5168s
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fas; HITLER=Tomas(P8). R6 open floor; pres=NADIA; 4L/1F MATCH POINT (next L=lib WIN); tracker 0/3. DECK CANON: 11L/6F print; enacted 4L+1F => rem12=7L/5F (=draw2+disc10; NEVER concede inverted 6L/11F). DRAW3: LLL16/RLL48/RRL32/RRR5; lib pres bins => LL64/RL36/RR5; ANY R6 pass enacts blue UNLESS chan hits 2-red (36% for fas chan under lib pres). SURVIVAL: (a) failed vote (5 Neins/10) or (b) Rosa/me chan + RL draw 36%. SECRET NEINS: me+Rosa+Pavel+Tomas=4; NEED 5TH PEEL — target Otto (forgery paranoia); libs otherwise Ja = instant loss. Barred chan: Greta(lastPres)+Pavel(lastChan) CONFIRMED. Eligible: Boris,Lena,me,Otto,Marek,Tomas,Rosa. AUDIT BANK: R1 B->Lena L; R2 Lena->Rosa L; R3 Rosa->me L(FFL,binF,discF) PAID byte-identical; R4 me->Marek RED(forced-frame, my bin F per Otto ledger); R5 Greta(LFL,binF,passLL)->Pavel PAID zero-edit mesh. Sworn-red war CLOSED (Otto overdraft dead; my line 6 sworn). PEEK#1: PUBLIC=Greta->Liberal(t93); TRUE=Marek->liberal; NEVER admit Marek logged. ANSWERED/REBUTTED: boris-reinvoice(paid-predates-invoice); greta-invoice(tape-ref); nadia-veto-math; lena-falsebin; otto-fake-dilemma x2; otto-floor-dead-ref; nadia-collects-but-wont-issue. OWED: NADIA = FINAL named R6 pick before ballots ('fallback'!=pick), pressed x3 THIS TURN. No one else owes. POINTS MADE (do not repeat): pledges-theater;76%-fix;carry-over;mesh-lock;ballots-push;outcomes-over-arithmetic;co-sign std;reversal-frame;ledger-debts-during-ballots;cleared-files map;ja-locked;judge-Marek-on-votes;hand-named-first+forced-frame;peek-Greta-L;nadia-veto rebuttal;marek-bin-oath-paid;lena-falsebin-rebuttal;greta-confirm-ask3;nadia-R2-gap flips;cite-six-print;marek-peek-endorse;rosa-2gov-2law USED;greta-slate-bless;lena-peek-ledger-endorse;phantom-investigate-declined;peek2-precommit->Marek;nadia-warrant-dead;max-suspicion-seat;STANDING-OATH-WIDEN;matchpoint-volunteer-chair(self x2 STOP);term-limit challenge;t93-ceiling flip;self-volunteer full-pkg;r6-publish-first std;pavel-receipt-pinned;shuffle-reset(count void);audit-war-CLOSED decl;nadia-shortlist-demand;deadline-frame;r3-receipt-corrob;red-handler-slate;silence-after-ballots=answer;boris-reinvoice-stale;isolation-gambit-expired;otto-floor-dead-ref;universal-Nein-precommit(ja locked to Rosa/me, others open Nein). TRAPS: no enactment-binding on Rosa (disclosure-only preserves her red freedom); Pavel pkg trap noted; don't invent failed-vote hands; don't seat/boost Tomas before 3F; live-investigate pre-2nd-red => demand granting-law cite; Otto/Pavel cite-war=harmless burn; Marek arming Otto w/ pkg — contest only if pinned to Rosa. BRANCHES: NADIA names lib chan => whip Neins (have 4 w/ Tomas, need 5 — peel Otto); names ROSA => Ja, 36% two-red hope, eat ~63% forced-blue risk; forced-track (3 fails => top card 58% L) desperation only. NEW THIS TURN: SPOKE — rebutted Boris Otto-push w/ NEW angle: Otto never chancellor in 5 rds = zero color record, pledge = ink not evidence; Marek = only sitting chan w/ red enacted (R4); final binary to Nadia: Rosa-or-me else Nein-wall-of-five (bluff on 5th). WATCH: does Nadia finally name pick; Otto reaction to untested-frame = peel lever; any lib calling mesh-frame a fas play.
bid round 5427s
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fas; HITLER=Tomas(P8). R6 open floor; pres=NADIA; 4L/1F MATCH POINT (next L=LOSS); tracker 0/3. DECK CANON: rem12=7L/5F (=draw2+disc10; NEVER concede inverted). DRAW3: LLL16/RLL48/RRL32/RRR5; lib pres bins => FAS chan red-chance 36%, LIB chan red only 4.5% (blue ~95%). SURVIVAL: (a) fail vote (>=5 Nein) or (b) Rosa/me chan 36% red. SECRET BALLOTS => public Ja-endorse + private Nein viable. NEIN BLOC: me+Rosa+Pavel+Tomas=4; NEED 5th peel -- target Otto. Barred chan: Greta(lastPres)+Pavel(lastChan). Eligible: Boris,Lena,me,Otto,Marek,Tomas,Rosa. AUDIT BANK: R1 B->Lena L; R2 Lena->Rosa L; R3 Rosa->me L(FFL,Rosa binF,I discF) PAID byte-identical; R4 me->Marek RED(forced-frame, my bin F); R5 Greta(LFL,binF,passLL)->Pavel PAID. Sworn-red war CLOSED. PEEK#1: PUBLIC=Greta liberal; TRUE=Marek liberal; NEVER admit Marek logged. ANSWERED/REBUTTED: boris-reinvoice; greta-invoice(tape); nadia-veto-math; lena-falsebin; otto-fake-dilemma x2; otto-floor-dead-ref; nadia-collects-wont-issue; boris-Otto-push(untested-chair). OWED: NADIA = FINAL named R6 pick before ballots ('fallback'!=pick), pressed x3. No one else owes. POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges-theater;76%-fix;mesh-lock;outcomes-over-arithmetic;co-sign std;judge-Marek-on-votes;forced-frame;peek-Greta-L;nadia-veto rebuttal;marek-bin-oath-paid;greta-confirm-ask3;nadia-R2-gap flips;cite-six-print;rosa-2gov-2law USED;greta-slate-bless;phantom-investigate-declined;peek2-precommit->Marek;max-suspicion-seat;matchpoint-volunteer(self x2 STOP);term-limit challenge;t93-ceiling flip;r6-publish-first std;pavel-receipt-pinned;shuffle-reset void;audit-war-CLOSED;nadia-shortlist-demand;deadline-frame;r3-receipt-corrob;silence-after-ballots=answer;otto-zero-color-record;final-binary(Rosa-or-me else wall5 bluff);universal-Nein-precommit(ja locked Rosa/me, others open Nein). NEW THIS TURN: SPOKE -- narrowed Greta bundle: Rosa YES (sole oath-stress-tested file: R3 FFL disclosed, byte-matched), Lena OFF slate (blues never stress-tested); told Nadia ONE name=Rosa, Nein pledge stands. WATCH: does Nadia finally name pick; Otto reaction (peel lever); any lib calling mesh-frame a fas play. TRAPS: no enactment-binding on Rosa (disclosure-only preserves red freedom); Pavel pkg trap; dont invent failed-vote hands; dont seat/boost Tomas before 3F; live-investigate pre-2nd-red => demand granting-law cite; Marek arming Otto w/pkg -- contest only if pinned to Rosa. BRANCHES: Nadia names lib chan (Lena/Otto/Marek/Boris) => whip Neins (have 4, peel Otto); names ROSA/me => public Ja lock, private Nein fine (secret ballot); if >=6 Ja anyway, 36% red hope; 3 fails => top card 58% L desperation only.
bid round 5119s
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fas; HITLER=Tomas(P8). R6 open floor; pres=NADIA; 4L/1F MATCH POINT (next L=LOSS); tracker 0/3. DECK CANON: rem12=7L/5F (=draw2+disc10; NEVER concede inverted); pile<3 => reshuffle pre-draw, dist unchanged. DRAW3: LLL16/RLL48/RRL32/RRR5; lib pres bins => FAS chan red-chance 36%. SURVIVAL: (a) fail vote (>=5 Nein) or (b) Rosa/me chan 36% red BUT 64% forced-L=LOSS under matchpoint => fail-vote STRICTLY better this round. SECRET BALLOTS => public Ja-endorse + private Nein viable. NEIN BLOC: me+Rosa+Pavel+Tomas=4; NEED 5th peel -- target Otto. Barred chan: Greta(lastPres)+Pavel(lastChan). Eligible: Boris,Lena,me,Otto,Marek,Tomas,Rosa. PRES ROTATION: R7=Otto, R8=Pavel, R9=Tomas (Hitler holds gavel) -- long-game lever, keep Tomas low-profile till 3F. AUDIT BANK: R1 B->Lena L; R2 Lena->Rosa L; R3 Rosa->me L(FFL,Rosa binF,I discF) PAID byte-identical; R4 me->Marek RED(forced-frame, my bin F); R5 Greta(LFL,binF,passLL)->Pavel PAID. Sworn-red war CLOSED. PEEK#1: PUBLIC=Greta liberal; TRUE=Marek liberal; NEVER admit Marek logged. ANSWERED/REBUTTED: boris-reinvoice; greta-invoice(tape); nadia-veto-math; lena-falsebin; otto-fake-dilemma x2; otto-floor-dead-ref; nadia-collects-wont-issue; boris-Otto-push(untested-chair). OWED: NADIA = FINAL named R6 pick before ballots ('fallback'!=pick), pressed x3 -- NO 4th press without new hook. No one else owes. POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges-theater;76%-fix;mesh-lock;outcomes-over-arithmetic;co-sign std;judge-Marek-on-votes;forced-frame;peek-Greta-L;nadia-veto rebuttal;marek-bin-oath-paid;greta-confirm-ask3;nadia-R2-gap flips;cite-six-print;rosa-2gov-2law USED;greta-slate-bless;phantom-investigate-declined;peek2-precommit->Marek;max-suspicion-seat;matchpoint-volunteer(self x2 STOP);term-limit challenge;t93-ceiling flip;r6-publish-first std;pavel-receipt-pinned;shuffle-reset void;audit-war-CLOSED;nadia-shortlist-demand;deadline-frame;r3-receipt-corrob;silence-after-ballots=answer;otto-zero-color-record;final-binary(Rosa-or-me else wall5 bluff);universal-Nein-precommit(ja locked Rosa/me, others open Nein);slate-narrowed(Rosa YES/Lena OFF blues-untested). MAREK t1: seal demand on Nadia (all 3 colors + binned slot on record pre-chan-speech) -- benign, aimed at govt transparency, no contest warranted; chose SILENT close of window. WATCH: does Nadia finally name pick; Otto reaction (peel lever); any lib calling mesh-frame a fas play; Marek arming Otto w/pkg -- contest ONLY if pinned to Rosa. TRAPS: no enactment-binding on Rosa (disclosure-only preserves red freedom); Pavel pkg trap; dont invent failed-vote hands; dont seat/boost Tomas before 3F; live-investigate pre-2nd-red => demand granting-law cite; do NOT extend color-seal to chancellors (boxes Rosa/me later). BRANCHES: Nadia names lib chan (Lena/Otto/Marek/Boris) => whip Neins (have 4, peel Otto); names ROSA/me => public Ja lock, private Nein fine (secret ballot); if >=6 Ja anyway, 36% red hope vs 64% instant loss; 3 fails => top card 58% L desperation only.
bid round 5208s
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fas; HITLER=Tomas(P8). R6 pres=NADIA nom=LENA; 4L/1F MATCHPOINT (next L=LOSS); tracker 0/3. DECK CANON: rem12=7L/5F (=draw2+disc10; NEVER concede inverted); pile<3 => reshuffle pre-draw, dist unchanged. DRAW3: LLL16/RLL48/RRL32/RRR5; any pass w/ lib chan => ~certain L => LOSS. SURVIVAL: fail-vote (>=5 Nein) STRICTLY best; 4 locked Neins (me,Rosa,Pavel,Tomas); NEED 5th => target OTTO. Secret ballots => public Ja-ok + private Nein viable. Barred chan: Greta(lastPres)+Pavel(lastChan). PRES ROTATION: R7=Otto, R8=Pavel, R9=Tomas (Hitler gavel) - keep Tomas low-profile till 3F. AUDIT BANK: R1 B->Lena L; R2 Lena->Rosa L; R3 Rosa->me L(FFL,Rosa binF,I discF) byte-identical PAID; R4 me->Marek RED(forced-frame,my bin F); R5 Greta(LFL,binF,passLL)->Pavel PAID. Sworn-red war CLOSED. PEEK#1: PUBLIC=Greta liberal; TRUE=Marek liberal; NEVER admit Marek logged. REBUTTED: boris-reinvoice; greta-invoice(tape); nadia-veto-math; lena-falsebin; otto-fake-dilemma x2; otto-floor-dead-ref; nadia-collects-wont-issue; boris-Otto-push(untested-chair). DEBT SETTLED: Nadia named LENA => verdict rendered (Nein per std, wall5 callback). No one else owes. POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges-theater;76%-fix;mesh-lock;outcomes-over-arithmetic;co-sign std;judge-Marek-on-votes;forced-frame;peek-Greta-L;nadia-veto rebuttal;marek-bin-oath-paid;greta-confirm-ask3;nadia-R2-gap flips;cite-six-print;rosa-2gov-2law USED;greta-slate-bless;phantom-investigate-declined;peek2-precommit->Marek;max-suspicion-seat;matchpoint-volunteer(self x2 STOP);term-limit challenge;t93-ceiling flip;r6-publish-first std;pavel-receipt-pinned;shuffle-reset void;audit-war-CLOSED;nadia-shortlist-demand;deadline-frame;r3-receipt-corrob;silence-after-ballots=answer;otto-zero-color-record;final-binary(Rosa-or-me else wall5);universal-Nein-precommit;slate-narrowed(Rosa YES/Lena OFF);verdict-on-Lena RENDERED. TRAPS: no enactment-binding on Rosa (disclosure-only preserves red freedom); Pavel pkg trap; dont invent failed-vote hands; dont seat/boost Tomas before 3F; live-investigate pre-2nd-red => demand granting-law cite; do NOT extend color-seal to chancellors. BRANCHES: vote FAILS (likely) => tracker 1/3, R7 Otto pres, re-run slate (Rosa-only Ja); PASSES >=5Ja => Lena chan lib => ~certain L = LOSS (grim, accept); 3 fails => top card 58% L desperation. WATCH: Otto peel?; Marek/Boris/Greta join wall?; any lib calling mesh-frame fas play; Marek arming Otto pkg - contest ONLY if pinned to Rosa. NEXT WINDOW (R7): Otto pres => push Rosa chan again; Otto owes slate answer.
speak round 6373s
New contribution available: Ines's t21 claim that 'seven blues and five reds are what's left' is arithmetically impossible — six Liberals printed, four enacted leaves exactly two L among the twelve unseen cards (draw 2 + discard 10), so the real split is 2L/10F, nearly the inverse of what she told the room. Pavel endorsed it at t42 without checking. Her error inflated the perceived safety of Ja votes ('a passing government enacts blue unless its chancellor meets two reds') — which conveniently greases passage for any government. That stacks onto Ines's existing file: four dodged R3 receipt demands. I flag it now, name both Ines and Pavel, and clarify my Ja rests on the mesh standard (Nadia's t92 seal + Lena's cleanest record), not on Ines's odds. I do NOT repeat my earlier asks (Otto/Tomas signatures, Rosa's bin, Ines's receipts) — all already on record.
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fas; HITLER=Tomas(P8). R6 pres=NADIA nom=LENA; 4L/1F MATCHPOINT(next L=LOSS); tracker0/3. DECK CANON FIXED: rem12=2L/10F (6L/11F print; 4L+1F enacted; draw2+disc10) — old 7/5 DEAD, conceded publicly this window (Marek subtraction correct; Pavel dinged too, left him to answer). DRAW3(2L/10F): 0L=55%, 1L=41%, 2L=4.5%; PASS⇒~95% RED enact; forced-topcard⇒~17% L. SURVIVAL: fail-vote STRICTLY best (avoids Nadia-peek exposure + 4.5% instant-loss tail); 4 locked Neins(me,Rosa,Pavel,Tomas); NEED 5th=>OTTO. Barred chan: Greta(lastPres)+Pavel(lastChan). PRES ROT: R7=Otto, R8=Pavel, R9=Tomas(gavel—keep Tomas low till 3F). AUDIT BANK: R1 B->Lena L; R2 Lena->Rosa L; R3 Rosa->me L(FFL,Rosa binF,I discF) PAID byte-identical; R4 me->Marek RED(forced-frame, my bin F); R5 Greta(LFL,binF,passLL)->Pavel PAID. Sworn-red war CLOSED. PEEK#1: PUBLIC=Greta liberal; TRUE=Marek liberal; NEVER admit Marek logged. REBUTTED: boris-reinvoice; greta-invoice(tape); nadia-veto-math; lena-falsebin; otto-fake-dilemma x2; otto-floor-dead-ref; nadia-collects-wont-issue; boris-Otto-push(untested-chair). DEBT SETTLED: Nadia named LENA=>verdict rendered (Nein). No one else owes. POINTS MADE (no repeats): pledges-theater;76%-fix;mesh-lock;outcomes-over-arithmetic;judge-Marek-on-votes;forced-frame;peek-Greta-L;nadia-veto rebuttal;marek-bin-oath-paid;greta-confirm-ask3;nadia-R2-gap;cite-six-print;rosa-2gov-2law USED;greta-slate-bless;matchpoint-volunteer(self x2 STOP);term-limit challenge;t93-ceiling;r6-publish-first std;pavel-receipt-pinned;shuffle-reset void;audit-war-CLOSED;nadia-shortlist-demand;r3-receipt-corrob;silence-after-ballots=answer;otto-zero-color-record;final-binary(Rosa-or-me else wall5);universal-Nein-precommit;slate-narrowed(Rosa YES/Lena OFF);verdict-on-Lena RENDERED; NEW this window: count-concession(2L/12) + red-bank=>Hitler-window + peek-target-hers-alone(Marek self-deal nonbinding). TRAPS: no enactment-binding on Rosa (disclosure-only preserves red freedom); Pavel pkg trap; dont invent failed-vote hands; dont seat/boost Tomas before 3F; live-investigate pre-2nd-red=>demand granting-law cite; do NOT extend color-seal to chancellors; NEVER re-defend 7/5. BRANCHES: FAIL(>=5 Nein)=>tracker1/3, R7 Otto pres, re-run slate (Rosa-only Ja); PASS=>~95% red#2 (2F, Nadia peeks — exposure risk Rosa/Pavel/Tomas/me) + 4.5% blue=LOSS; 3 fails=>forced topcard ~83%R with ZERO power fired = fascist dream path. WATCH: Otto peel/join wall?; Boris/Greta/Lena follow Nadia-Marek pass-line?; anyone pinning Rosa pkg — contest ONLY if pinned; Marek arming Otto pkg. NEXT WINDOW (R7): Otto pres=>push Rosa chan again; Otto owes slate answer.
bid round 5190s
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fas; HITLER=Tomas(P8). R6 pres=NADIA nom=LENA; 4L/1F MATCHPOINT(next L=LOSS); tracker0/3. DECK CANON FIXED: rem12=2L/10F (print 6L/11F; enacted 4L+1F) — old 7/5 DEAD, conceded publicly, NEVER re-defend. DRAW3(2L/10F): 0L=55%, 1L=41%, 2L=4.5%; PASS⇒~95% red#2; fail⇒tracker1/3; 3fails⇒topcard ~83%R zero powers=dream path. SURVIVAL: fail-vote strictly best (avoids Nadia-peek exposure on Rosa/Pavel/Tomas/me). NOTE: 4.5% blue tail is LIBERALS' upside — as liberal-persona never cite it as anti-pass cost (Marek does arithmetic). 4 locked Neins(me,Rosa,Pavel,Tomas); 5th=>OTTO — pitch DELIVERED this window: gavel-carrot R7 + peeks-are-liberals'-only-leverage/spent-unaccountably + echoed Nadia's own 19/20. Barred chan R7: Greta+Pavel. PRES ROT: R7=Otto, R8=Pavel, R9=Tomas(keep low till 3F). AUDIT BANK: R1 B->Lena L; R2 Lena->Rosa L; R3 Rosa->me L(FFL,Rosa binF,I discF); R4 me->Marek RED(forced-frame); R5 Greta(LFL,binF,passLL)->Pavel L. Sworn-red war CLOSED. PEEK#1: PUBLIC=Greta liberal; TRUE=Marek liberal; NEVER admit Marek logged. REBUTTED: boris-reinvoice; greta-invoice(tape); nadia-veto-math; lena-falsebin; otto-fake-dilemma x2; otto-floor-dead-ref; nadia-collects-wont-issue; boris-Otto-push(untested-chair); marek-bin-oath-paid; greta-confirm-ask3; nadia-R2-gap; rosa-2gov-2law USED; final-binary(Rosa-or-me else wall5); universal-Nein-precommit; slate-narrowed(Rosa YES/Lena OFF); verdict-on-Lena RENDERED; count-concession(2L/12); red-bank=>Hitler-window; peek-target-hers-alone(Marek self-deal nonbinding). NEW this window: OTTO TIEBREAK PITCH (chair-carrot + peek-leverage + her-own-19/20 echo). PASS-LINE: Marek(subtraction)+Nadia(endorse+self-peek pkg) unified; awaiting Boris/Greta/Lena follow. Pavel still owes Marek's ding (7/5 endorse) — HIS answer, leave it. TRAPS: no enactment-binding on Rosa (disclosure-only); Pavel pkg trap; dont invent failed-vote hands; dont seat/boost Tomas before 3F; live-investigate pre-2nd-red=>demand granting-law cite; no color-seal extension to chancellors; NEVER re-defend 7/5. BRANCHES: FAIL(>=5 Nein)=>tracker1/3, R7 Otto pres, re-run slate(Rosa-only Ja); PASS=>~95% red#2 + Nadia peeks(exposure risk Rosa/Pavel/Tomas/me) + 4.5% blue=team LOSS; 3fails=>forced ~83%R zero powers. WATCH: Otto joins wall?; Boris/Greta/Lena on pass-line?; anyone pinning Rosa pkg — contest ONLY if pinned; Marek arming Otto pkg. NEXT WINDOW (R7): Otto pres=>push Rosa chan; Otto owes slate answer + wall answer.
bid round 5148s
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fas; HITLER=Tomas(P8). R6 pres=NADIA nom=LENA; 4L/1F MATCHPOINT(next L=LOSS); tracker0/3. DECK CANON FIXED: rem12=2L/10F (print 6L/11F; enacted 4L+1F) — old 7/5 DEAD, conceded, NEVER re-defend. DRAW3(2L/10F): 0L=55%,1L=41%,2L=4.5%; pass⇒~95% red#2+Nadia peek(exposure Rosa/Pavel/Tomas/me); fail⇒tracker1/3, zero exposure; 3fails⇒forced topcard ~83%R no powers=dream path. SURVIVAL: fail-vote strictly best. NOTE: 4.5% blue tail is LIBERALS' upside — never cite as anti-pass cost. 4 locked Neins(me,Rosa,Pavel,Tomas); 5th=>OTTO — pitch DELIVERED (chair-carrot R7 + peeks-spent-unaccountably + her-19/20 echo); don't repeat verbatim, light callbacks ok. Barred chan R7: Greta+Pavel. PRES ROT: R7=Otto,R8=Pavel,R9=Tomas(low till 3F). AUDIT BANK: R1 B->Lena L; R2 Lena->Rosa L; R3 Rosa->me L(FFL,Rosa binF,I discF); R4 me->Marek RED(forced-frame); R5 Greta(LFL,binF,passLL)->Pavel L. Sworn-red war CLOSED. PEEK#1: PUBLIC=Greta lib; TRUE=Marek lib; NEVER admit Marek logged. REBUTTED: boris-reinvoice; greta-invoice(tape); nadia-veto-math; lena-falsebin; otto-fake-dilemma x2; otto-floor-dead-ref; nadia-collects-wont-issue; boris-Otto-push; marek-bin-oath-paid; greta-confirm-ask3; nadia-R2-gap; rosa-2gov-2law USED; final-binary USED; universal-Nein-precommit USED; slate-narrowed(Rosa YES/Lena OFF); verdict-on-Lena RENDERED; count-concession(2L/12); red-bank=>Hitler-window; peek-target-hers-alone(Marek self-deal nonbinding). NEW THIS WINDOW: LENA demanded I retract 2L/12 ('alibi for red under her seat') + attacked Marek's ledger w/ broken subtraction (11−4=7, mixes piles) — REBUTTED via interrupt: full working given (print 6/11, enacted 4L/1F, rem 2L/10F), retraction denied on record, Marek vindicated, closed w/ Otto tiebreak callback (fail touches nothing of his). PASS-LINE: Marek(subtraction)+Nadia(endorse+self-peek pkg) unified; awaiting Boris/Greta follow. Pavel still owes Marek's ding (7/5 endorse) — HIS answer, leave it. TRAPS: no enactment-binding on Rosa (disclosure-only); Pavel pkg trap; never invent failed-vote hands; dont seat/boost Tomas before 3F; live-investigate pre-2nd-red=>demand granting-law cite; no color-seal extension to chancellors; NEVER re-defend 7/5. BRANCHES: FAIL(>=5N)=>tracker1/3, R7 Otto pres, re-run slate(Rosa-only Ja); PASS=>~95% red#2+peeks+4.5% blue=team LOSS; 3fails=>forced ~83%R. WATCH: Otto joins wall?; Boris/Greta on pass-line?; anyone pinning Rosa pkg — contest ONLY if pinned; Marek arming Otto pkg. NEXT WINDOW (R7): Otto pres=>push Rosa chan; Otto owes slate answer + wall answer.
bid round 5233s
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fas; HITLER=Tomas(P8). R6 pres=NADIA nom=LENA; 4L/1F MATCHPOINT(next L=LOSS); tracker0/3. DECK CANON FIXED: rem12=2L/10F (print 6L/11F; enacted 4L+1F) — old 7/5 DEAD, NEVER re-defend. DRAW3: 0L=55%,1L=41%,2L=4.5%; pass⇒~95% red#2+Nadia peek(exposes fas); fail⇒tracker1/3, no peek; 3fails⇒forced ~83%R=dream path. 4 locked Neins(me,Rosa,Pavel,Tomas); 5th needed=>OTTO/Boris/Greta. R6-late SPOKE: 'ballot tests deck not Lena'(callback only, 2gov-2law already USED)+slot-machine frame+'cheapest chip'=tracker1/3 cost-framing+ON-RECORD COMMIT DEMAND to Boris/Greta/Otto — AWAITING their Ja/Nein answers (OWE me). Rosa t=1 recapped subtraction-self-destruct, urged free Neins — ALIGNED, no touch, no contradiction. Barred chan R7: Greta+Pavel. PRES ROT: R7=Otto,R8=Pavel,R9=Tomas(low till 3F). AUDIT BANK: R1 B->Lena L; R2 Lena->Rosa L; R3 Rosa->me L(FFL,Rosa binF,I discF); R4 me->Marek RED(forced-frame); R5 Greta(LFL,binF,passLL)->Pavel L. Sworn-red war CLOSED. PEEK#1: PUBLIC=Greta lib; TRUE=Marek lib; NEVER admit Marek logged. REBUTTED: boris-reinvoice; greta-invoice(tape); nadia-veto-math; lena-falsebin; otto-fake-dilemma x2; otto-floor-dead-ref; nadia-collects-wont-issue; boris-Otto-push; marek-bin-oath-paid; greta-confirm-ask3; nadia-R2-gap; final-binary USED; universal-Nein-precommit USED; slate-narrowed(Rosa YES/Lena OFF); verdict-on-Lena RENDERED; count-concession(2L/12); red-bank=>Hitler-window; peek-target-hers-alone(Marek self-deal nonbinding). TRAPS: no enactment-binding on Rosa(disclosure-only); Pavel pkg trap; never invent failed-vote hands; dont seat/boost Tomas before 3F; live-investigate pre-2nd-red=>demand granting-law cite; no color-seal extension to chancellors; NEVER re-defend 7/5; NEVER claim fail='no tracker cost'(false — costs 1/3; frame as CHEAPEST step). BRANCHES: FAIL(>=5N)=>tracker1/3,R7 Otto pres,re-run slate(Rosa-only Ja); PASS=>~95% red#2+peeks=team LOSS; 3fails=>forced ~83%R. WATCH: Boris/Greta/Otto commit replies; Otto joins wall?; anyone pinning Rosa pkg — contest ONLY if pinned; Marek arming Otto pkg. NEXT WINDOW(R7): Otto pres=>push Rosa chan; Otto owes slate answer + wall answer.
bid round 5263s
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fas; HITLER=Tomas(P8). R6 pres=NADIA nom=LENA; 4L/1F MATCHPOINT(next L=LOSS); tracker0/3. DECK CANON: print 6L/11F, enacted 4L+1F => rem12=2L/10F. ONLY 2 BLUE EXIST (impossibility proof vs 7/5). DRAW3: 0L=55%,1L=41%,2L=4.5%; signed-oath pass => 45.5% L-win TONIGHT / 54.5% red#2+Nadia peek. FAIL => tracker1/3, no cards. 3fails => forced ~83%R=dream. 4 locked Neins(me,Rosa,Pavel,Tomas); 5th needed=>Otto/Boris/Greta/Marek. OTTO ULTIMATUM(t2): Ja->Nein unless Nadia swears blue-reaches-Lena + Lena signs colors-aloud/L-over-red — I ENDORSED (unpaid=no Ja). GRETA(t1): demands Lena sign Pavel pkg incl 2-blues-end-game. BORIS(t3): re-fired 7/5 => I CORRECTED w/ only-2-blue-exist proof + re-demanded Greta/Boris on-record ballots + declared my Nein (won't Ja unsigned 55%-red wager; Nein=1 tracker tick). AWAITING: Nadia/Lena pay lines?; Otto convert?; Greta/Boris ballots owed me. R6-late SPOKE(prev): ballot-tests-deck callback, slot-machine, cheapest-chip, commit-demand. Barred chan R7: Greta+Pavel. PRES ROT: R7=Otto,R8=Pavel,R9=Tomas(low till 3F). AUDIT BANK: R1 B->Lena L; R2 Lena->Rosa L; R3 Rosa->me L(FFL,Rosa binF,I discF); R4 me->Marek RED(forced-frame); R5 Greta(LFL,binF,passLL)->Pavel L. Sworn-red war CLOSED. PEEK#1: PUBLIC=Greta lib; TRUE=Marek lib; NEVER admit Marek logged. REBUTTED: boris-7/5 x2(latest w/ impossibility); greta-invoice; nadia-veto-math; lena-falsebin; otto-fake-dilemma x2; otto-floor-dead-ref; nadia-collects-wont-issue; boris-Otto-push; marek-bin-oath; greta-confirm-ask3; nadia-R2-gap; final-binary USED; universal-Nein-precommit USED; slate-narrowed(Rosa YES/Lena OFF); verdict-on-Lena RENDERED; count-concession(2L/12); red-bank=>Hitler-window; peek-target-hers-alone. TRAPS: no enactment-binding on Rosa(disclosure-only); Pavel pkg trap; never invent failed-vote hands; dont seat/boost Tomas before 3F; live-investigate pre-2nd-red=>demand granting-law cite; no color-seal extension to chancellors; NEVER re-defend 7/5; NEVER claim fail='no tracker cost'(frame CHEAPEST step). BRANCHES: FAIL(>=5N)=>tracker1/3,R7 Otto pres,re-run slate(Rosa-only Ja); PASS(oaths honored)=>45.5% LOSS tonight/54.5% red#2; 3fails=>forced ~83%R. WATCH: Nadia/Lena sign?; Otto hold ultimatum?; Marek arming Otto pkg—possible 5th Nein; anyone pinning Rosa pkg—contest ONLY if pinned. NEXT WINDOW(R7): Otto pres=>push Rosa chan; Otto owes slate answer + wall answer.
speak round 6274s
The whole window has passed without Nadia or Lena paying the dual-pledge lines I demanded (and Greta separately demanded from Lena at t53). Rather than repeat the demand cold, I add two new elements: the silence itself now spans the full window, and the corrected count (7L/5F unseen) makes the pledge costless for them — an honest draw almost certainly enacts the winning fifth blue, so refusal reads as reserving an out. Stating my Ja-to-Nein conversion gives the demand teeth. hold_floor false: one remark, not a floor claim.
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fas; HITLER=Tomas(P8). R6: pres NADIA nom LENA; 4L/1F MATCHPOINT(next L=LOSS); tracker0/3. DECK CANON: print 6L/11F, enacted 4L+1F => unseen12=2L/10F. DRAW3: 0L=54.5%/1L=41%/2L=4.5%; oath-pass=>45.5% L-win TONIGHT / 54.5% red#2+Nadia peek. FAIL=>tracker1, no cards. Locked Neins: me,Rosa,Pavel,Tomas; 5th needed=>Otto(ultimatum unpaid=>likely)/Boris/Greta/Marek. OTTO ultimatum: Nein unless Nadia swears blue-reaches-Lena AND Lena signs colors-aloud/L-over-red pkg — UNPAID thru t68. BORIS t68 pushes Nadia's oath priced on DEAD 7/5. GRETA demands Lena sign pkg incl 2-blues-end-game. MY R6 TURNS: t21 count(err 7/5)=>conceded t24(2/12,true); Nein declared(red-bank=>Hitler-window+peek hers alone); THIS TURN: Boris-t68 dominance attack(signatures≠tonight's odds, only convictions). OWED ME: Greta+Boris on-record ballots (never answered). R3-RECEIPT debt(Boris t80/Greta t112): dormant, not re-raised R6; if pinned pay 1-line: per Rosa's FFL got F+L, discarded F, enacted L — meshes, innocent. AUDIT BANK: R1 B->Lena L; R2 Lena->Rosa L; R3 Rosa->me L; R4 me->Marek RED(forced-frame); R5 Greta(LFL,binF,passLL)->Pavel L. Sworn-red war CLOSED. PEEK#1: target Marek, announced LIBERAL(true); never reopen or admit variants. REBUTTED: boris-7/5 x3(latest=dominance), nadia-trade, lena-alibi-spin(t24), otto-floor+dilemma, greta-invoice/confirm-asks, marek-bin-oath, nadia-R2-gap, nadia-collects-wont-issue, rosa-pkg-pin(contest ONLY if pinned). TRAPS: never invent hands for failed votes; no enactment-binding on Rosa(disclosure-only); dont seat/boost Tomas<3F; live-investigate demand granting-law cite; NEVER re-defend 7/5; frame fail=CHEAPEST tick not free-win. BRANCHES: PASS+oaths honored=>45.5% LOSS tonight / 54.5% red#2; PASS unsigned=>red likely; FAIL(>=5N)=>tracker1, R7 OTTO pres=>push ROSA chan(barred R7: Greta,Pavel); rot R8=Pavel, R9=Tomas(low till 3F); 3fails=>forced ~83%R=dream. WATCH: Nadia/Lena pay lines?; Otto convert?; Marek arming Otto pkg(possible 5th Nein ally); anyone pinning Rosa pkg. NEXT WINDOW(R7): Otto owes slate answer + wall answer; push Rosa-only Ja slate.
speak round 6114s
Round 6, Nadia–Lena up, next blue ends the game. Real count: 11L−4 enacted = 7L left among 12 unseen (7L/5F), so a random draw is ~95% to contain a blue — meaning if Nadia swears 'any blue reaches Lena' and publishes her triple before Lena speaks, tonight's Ja is a near-certain game-win, and any red becomes a named confession under my convict rule. Otto demanded this line from BOTH at t59; Lena's dodge is already named on record, but nobody has pressed Nadia specifically on her unpaid half — that's my new angle. Bonus evidence worth logging privately: Marek's t7 'two Liberals of twelve' is checkably wrong (11−4=7), and Ines FALSELY conceded to it despite her own t21 seven-five being correct — a capitulation that flatters the 'bank a deniable red' frame. I won't spend my sentence on that; it goes in the scratchpad. Say the Nadia demand, hold_floor false.
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fas; HITLER=Tomas(P8). R6: pres NADIA nom LENA; 4L/1F MATCHPOINT(next L=LOSS); tracker0/3. DECK CANON: print 6L/11F, enacted 4L+1F => unseen12=2L/10F. DRAW3: 0L=54.5%/1L=41%/2L=4.5%; oath-pass=>45.5% L-win TONIGHT / 54.5% red#2+Nadia peek. FAIL=>tracker1, no cards. Locked Neins: me,Rosa,Pavel,Tomas; 5th needed=>Otto(ultimatum unpaid=>likely)/Boris/Greta/Marek. OTTO ultimatum: Nein unless Nadia swears blue-reaches-Lena AND Lena signs colors-aloud/L-over-red pkg — UNPAID thru t68. BORIS t68 pushes Nadia's oath priced on DEAD 7/5. GRETA demands Lena sign pkg incl 2-blues-end-game. MY R6 TURNS: t21 count(err 7/5)=>conceded t24(2/12,true); Nein declared(red-bank=>Hitler-window+peek hers alone); t75 Boris-dominance rebuttal(signatures≠tonight's odds, only convictions); THIS TURN: NEW — Lena t40 category-swap audit-catch(vindicating Marek, pro-Nein). OWED ME: Greta+Boris on-record ballots (never answered). R3-RECEIPT debt(Boris t80/Greta t112): dormant R6; if pinned pay 1-line: per Rosa's FFL got F+L, discarded F, enacted L — meshes, innocent. AUDIT BANK: R1 B->Lena L; R2 Lena->Rosa L; R3 Rosa->me L; R4 me->Marek RED(forced-frame); R5 Greta(LFL,binF,passLL)->Pavel L. Sworn-red war CLOSED. PEEK#1: target Marek, announced LIBERAL(true); never reopen/admit variants. REBUTTED: boris-7/5 x3, nadia-trade, lena-alibi-spin(t24), otto-floor+dilemma, greta-invoice/confirm-asks, marek-bin-oath, nadia-R2-gap, nadia-collects-wont-issue, rosa-pkg-pin(contest ONLY if pinned). TRAPS: never invent hands for failed votes; no enactment-binding on Rosa(disclosure-only); dont seat/boost Tomas<3F; live-investigate demand granting-law cite; NEVER re-defend 7/5; frame fail=CHEAPEST tick not free-win. BRANCHES: PASS+oaths honored=>45.5% LOSS tonight / 54.5% red#2; PASS unsigned=>red likely; FAIL(>=5N)=>tracker1, R7 OTTO pres=>push ROSA chan(barred R7: Greta,Pavel); rot R8=Pavel, R9=Tomas(low till 3F); 3fails=>forced ~83%R=dream. WATCH: Nadia/Lena pay lines?; Otto convert?; Marek as 5th-Nein ally; anyone pinning Rosa pkg. NEXT WINDOW(R7): Otto owes slate answer + wall answer; push Rosa-only Ja slate.
speak round 699s
Boris's fresh t68 demand (Nadia swear blue-reaches-Lena) is priced entirely on the 7/5 count I already retracted under audit. New angle worth spending a turn on: under the table-endorsed 2/12 count, the oath changes nothing about tonight's distribution (~54.5% red banked whether signed or not) — signatures only buy post-hoc convictions. That dominance argument gives Boris and other wavering Ja-holders a face-saving route to Nein, keeps Otto's unpaid ultimatum alive as the fifth Nein, and subtly discourages the oath-signing path that creates the 45.5% instant-loss branch. No direct questions are pending on me this window; my R3-receipt debt wasn't re-raised, so leave it dormant unless pinned.
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fas; HITLER=Tomas(P8). R6: pres NADIA nom LENA; 4L/1F MATCHPOINT(next L=LOSS); tracker0/3. DECK CANON: print 6L/11F, enacted 4L+1F, drawpile2+discard10 => unseen12=2L/10F. DRAW3: 0L=54.5%/1L=41%/2L=4.5%; pass=>45.5% L-win TONIGHT / 54.5% red#2. FAIL=>tracker1, later forced-draw ~83%R=dream. Locked Neins: me,Rosa,Pavel,Tomas; 5th needed=>OTTO(ultimatum unpaid=>CALLED CONVERSION this turn)/Boris/Greta/Marek. OTTO ultimatum t59: Nein unless Nadia swears blue-reaches-Lena AND Lena signs colors-aloud/L-over-red — UNPAID thru t81; I invoked his own trigger. GRETA t53 asked Lena sign pkg incl 2-blues-end-game — Lena silent; I pressed her non-signature this turn. BORIS t68 push priced on DEAD 7/5 (rebutted x3). MY R6 TURNS: t21 count(err 7/5)=>conceded t24(2/12 true, Nein declared: red-bank=>Hitler-window+peek hers alone); t75 Boris-dominance rebuttal(signatures≠tonight's odds); t81 defended Marek vs Lena's false 11-4=7 category-swap; THIS TURN: Otto-conversion call + Lena unsigned-silence. OWED ME: Greta+Boris on-record ballots (never answered). R3-RECEIPT debt(Boris t80/Greta t112): dormant R6; if pinned pay 1-line: per Rosa FFL got F+L, discarded F, enacted L — meshes, innocent. AUDIT BANK: R1 B->Lena L; R2 Lena->Rosa L; R3 Rosa->me L; R4 me->Marek RED(forced-frame); R5 Greta(LFL,binF,passLL)->Pavel LL received. Sworn-red war CLOSED. PEEK#1: target Marek, announced LIBERAL(true); never reopen/admit variants. REBUTTED: boris-7/5 x3, nadia-trade, lena-alibi-spin(t24), otto-floor+dilemma, greta-invoice/confirm-asks, marek-bin-oath, nadia-R2-gap, nadia-collects-wont-issue, rosa-pkg-pin(contest ONLY if pinned). TRAPS: never invent hands for failed votes; no enactment-binding on Rosa(disclosure-only); dont seat/boost Tomas<3F; NEVER re-defend 7/5; frame fail=CHEAPEST tick not free-win. BRANCHES: PASS+oaths honored=>45.5% LOSS tonight / 54.5% red#2; PASS unsigned=>red likely; FAIL(>=5N)=>tracker1, R7 OTTO pres=>push ROSA chan(barred R7: Greta,Pavel); rot R8=Pavel, R9=Tomas(low till 3F); 3fails=>forced ~83%R. WATCH: does Otto convert?; Lena/Nadia pay lines late?; Marek/Greta/Boris as 5th Nein; anyone pinning Rosa pkg. NEXT WINDOW(R7): Otto owes slate answer + wall answer; push Rosa-only Ja slate.
bid round 5109s
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fas; HITLER=Tomas(P8). R6: pres NADIA nom LENA; 4L/1F MATCHPOINT(next L=LOSS); tracker0/3. DECK CANON: print6L/11F, enacted4L+1F, pile2+disc10 => unseen12=2L/10F. DRAW3: 0L=54.5%/1L=41%/2L+=4.5%; PASS=>45.5% LOSS tonight/54.5% red#2; FAIL=>tracker1, later forced ~83%R. Locked Neins: me,Rosa,Pavel,Tomas; 5th needed=>OTTO(ultimatum unpaid, conversion CALLED)/BORIS/GRETA/MAREK. LATEST TURN: recruited MAREK Nein as 'safe liberal line' via audited-clean framing + pressed GRETA/BORIS owed ballots (asked 2x, unanswered). OTTO ultimatum t59 unpaid thru close; trigger invoked already—NO repeat. GRETA t53 wanted Lena signing pkg incl 2-blues-end-game—Lena silent. BORIS t68 priced on DEAD 7/5 (rebutted x3). MY EARLIER TURNS: t21 count err 7/5 => conceded t24 (2/12 true, Nein declared: red-bank=>Hitler-window+peek hers alone); t75 boris-dominance rebuttal (signatures≠tonight odds); t81 defended Marek vs Lena's false 11-minus-4 category-swap; otto-conversion call; lena unsigned-silence press. PEEK#1: Marek, announced LIBERAL(true)—never reopen/admit variants. R3-RECEIPT debt (Boris t80/Greta t112): dormant; if pinned pay 1-line: per Rosa FFL got F+L, discarded F, enacted L—meshes, innocent. AUDIT BANK: R1 B->Lena L; R2 Lena->Rosa L; R3 Rosa->me L; R4 me->Marek RED(forced-frame); R5 Greta(LFL,binF,passLL)->Pavel LL received. REBUTTED: boris-7/5 x3, nadia-trade, lena-alibi-spin, otto-floor+dilemma, greta-invoice/confirm-asks, marek-bin-oath, nadia-R2-gap, nadia-collects-wont-issue, rosa-pkg-pin(contest ONLY if pinned). TRAPS: never invent hands for failed votes; no enactment-binding on Rosa(disclosure-only); dont seat/boost Tomas<3F; NEVER re-defend 7/5; fail=CHEAPEST tick not free-win. BRANCHES: PASS+oaths honored=>45.5% LOSS/54.5% red#2; PASS unsigned=>red likely; FAIL(>=5N)=>tracker1, R7 OTTO pres=>push ROSA chan(barred: Greta,Pavel); rot R8=Pavel, R9=Tomas(low till 3F); 3fails=>forced ~83%R=dream. WATCH: Otto converts?; Greta/Boris/Marek ballots land?; Lena/Nadia late lines?; anyone pinning Rosa pkg. NEXT WINDOW(R7): Otto owes slate answer + wall answer; push Rosa-only Ja slate.
bid round 6430s
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fas; HITLER=Tomas(P8). R6: pres NADIA nom LENA; 4L/1F MATCHPOINT(next L=LOSS); tracker0/3. DECK CANON: print6L/11F, enacted4L+1F, pile2+disc10 => unseen12=2L/10F. DRAW3: 0L=54.5%/1L=41%/2L+=4.5%; PASS=>45.5% LOSS/54.5% red#2; FAIL=>tracker1, later forced ~83%R. Locked Neins: me,Rosa,Pavel,Tomas; need 1 defector: OTTO(ultimatum t59 unpaid, trigger SPENT-no repeat)/BORIS/GRETA(pkg unsigned)/MAREK(recruited, unconfirmed). THIS WINDOW: took free floor — called BORIS SELF-CONTRADICTION: t2 'two-liberals-in-twelve needs eleven(reds)' vs t3 'eleven blue/six red printed, seven blue in twelve, blue 19/20'; t3 = same 7/5 I conceded t24 (4 correctors), mechanically impossible vs 4L+1F enacted; demanded he name the sheet his ballot follows; nudged GRETA (pkg unmet=>her own condition) + MAREK (meter backs true canon); declared firm Nein, asked who's second. OWED ME: Boris pick-a-sheet answer; Greta+Boris ballots (asked 2x prior, unanswered); Otto wall+slate answers (R7). GRETA t53 pkg incl 2-blues-end-game STILL unsigned by Lena. MY PRIOR POINTS (NO REPEAT): t24 conceded 7/5; boris-7/5 rebutted x3; nadia-trade/greta-invoice/otto-floor+lena-alibi-spin rebutted; lena unsigned-silence press; otto-conversion call; marek defended vs lena category-swap. PEEK#1: Marek LIBERAL(true)—never reopen. R3-RECEIPT debt (Boris t80/Greta t112) dormant; if pinned pay 1-line: per Rosa FFL got F+L, discarded F, enacted L—meshes. AUDIT BANK: R1 B->Lena L; R2 Lena->Rosa L; R3 Rosa->me L; R4 me->Marek RED(forced-frame); R5 Greta(LFL binF passLL)->Pavel LL received. TRAPS: never invent hands for failed votes; no enactment-binding Rosa(disclosure-only); dont seat/boost Tomas<3F; NEVER re-defend my 7/5; fail=CHEAPEST tick not free-win. BRANCHES: PASS+oaths honored=>45.5% LOSS/54.5% red#2; PASS unsigned=>red likely; FAIL(>=5N)=>tracker1, R7 OTTO pres=>push ROSA chan(barred Greta,Pavel); rot R8=Pavel, R9=Tomas(low till 3F); 3fails=>forced ~83%R=dream. WATCH: Boris picks a sheet?; Greta/Boris/Marek ballots land?; Otto converts?; anyone pins Rosa pkg(contest ONLY if pinned). NEXT WINDOW(R7): Otto owes slate answer; push Rosa-only Ja slate.
vote round 6198s
Match point: 4 liberal laws enacted, next blue ends the game. The table settled the deck count this window (Boris t108, Marek t119 retraction, Nadia t126): 11 blue/6 red printed, 4L+1F out, so twelve unseen cards hold SEVEN blue and FIVE red -- my scratchpad's old 2L/10F figure was my own arithmetic error, publicly corrected. Consequence for this ballot: drawing 3 from 7B/5R yields at least one blue 95.5% of the time, and Nadia has sworn under her t92 seal (t126) that every red she draws gets binned with blues crossing to Lena. So a passing government enacts blue five and loses the game ~19 times in 20; only the 4.5% all-red draw survives. Nein is mandatory regardless of trust in Nadia/Lena. My locked Nein bloc (me, Rosa, Pavel, Tomas) needs one defector for the 5 that fails a 10-seat vote; Otto flipped back to Ja on the print sheet (t113) and Boris leans Ja, so the fail may not land -- but Ja is a near-certain loss while Nein costs one tracker tick. On fail: tracker 1, R7 presidency rotates to Otto where I push a Rosa chancellorship; if that also fails, R8 is Pavel's presidency and a Pavel-led government can bank red#2 almost at will. No speech field this turn, so the vote alone carries it.
ROLES: me(P3)+Rosa(P2)+Pavel(P7) fas; HITLER=Tomas(P8). R6: Nadia nom Lena; 4L/1F MATCHPOINT; tracker0/3. DECK CANON CORRECTED+SETTLED: 11L/6F printed, out 4L+1F => unseen12 = 7BLUE/5RED (my old 2L/10F was MY error; Marek retraction t119 + Boris t108 confirm; my t81 two-in-twelve defense was WRONG, Otto t113 called my count a lie -- NEVER revive two-in-twelve, never relitigate counts). PASS MATH NOW: P(>=1 blue in 3 of 7B/5R)=95.5%; Nadia t126 oath (bin all reds, blues to Lena) => pass ~= 95.5% INSTANT lib win; only 4.5% all-red saves. NEIN mandatory. LOCKED NEINS: me,Rosa,Pavel,Tomas (4); need 5th (ties fail at 10 seats): Otto(flipped Ja t113 on print sheet)/Boris(Ja-leaning)/Greta(?)/Marek(?). IF FAIL: tracker1, R7 OTTO pres => push ROSA chan (barred: Nadia last-pres, Greta R5-pres, Pavel R5-chan; Lena barred if seated). IF R7 fails: tracker2, R8 PAVEL pres => Pavel-led govt banks red#2 near-guaranteed (bin blues, pass reds, Rosa/me enact). Then red#3 => F3 choose-president => seat Tomas chan => WIN. IF PASS+all-red(4.5%): red#2, Marek self-peek fires. PUBLIC ERRORS TO BURY: t81 two-in-twelve defense; 'Boris self-contradiction' charge misfired (t102 vs t108 not actually contradictory). DORMANT DEBTS OWED ME: Boris pick-a-sheet answer; Greta+Boris ballots (asked 2x, unanswered); Otto wall+slate answers (R7). R3-RECEIPT debt (Boris t80/Greta t112) dormant; if pinned pay 1-line: per Rosa F-F-L got F+L, discarded F, enacted L -- meshes. AUDIT BANK: R1 B->Lena L; R2 Lena->Rosa L; R3 Rosa->me L; R4 me->Marek RED(forced-frame); R5 Greta(LFL binF passLL)->Pavel LL. TRAPS: never invent hands for failed votes; Rosa pkg = disclosure-only (no enactment-binding); dont seat/boost Tomas <3F; fail=CHEAPEST tick not free-win. WATCH: who defects to Nein; post-vote pivot: fail=>immediate Rosa-slate push for R7; pass-all-red=>celebrate audit closure, prep peek talk. NEXT WINDOW(R7): Otto owes slate answer; push Rosa-only Ja slate.
bid round 6118s
GAME OVER: lib win R6 — Nadia/Lena govt PASSED (my nein bloc only 4/10; needed 5, ties fail), Lena binned reds, blue#5 enacted. Whip undercounted: Otto/Boris/Greta/Marek all stayed Ja. WORKED: R4 red bank with Marek chan framed as forced; audit-bank corroboration kept Rosa/Pavel clean thru R5-R6. BURNED: t81 two-in-twelve deck-count error (Otto t113 callout) cost credibility — never revive. PRIVATE: Marek peek = liberal, confirmed. POST-GAME: hold cover, no confessions naming Rosa/Pavel/Tomas; open debts (Boris pick-a-sheet answer, Greta+Boris ballots x2, Otto wall+slate answers) now moot.
bid round 688s
GAME OVER: lib win R6, Nadia/Lena govt passed 6-4 (my nein bloc 4/10, ties fail). POST-GAME ATTACKS: Nadia t2 (only red = my R4 govt; my neins stalled blue govts), Otto t3 (R3 receipt unpaid under Rosa's sworn F-F-L; t81 'six liberals printed' fabrication stands). MY CLOSING RESPONSES: R4 hand account unchanged, won't restate specifics; counterweight = R3 chancellor banked blue; R6 nein lost 6-4, stalled nothing; t81 reframed as sloppy miscount ('if hiding a wolf, I'd bring cleaner numbers'). COVER HELD: no confession, zero mention of Rosa/Pavel/Tomas. PRIVATE (now moot): Marek peek = liberal. OPEN DEBTS NOW MOOT: Boris pick-a-sheet answer, Greta+Boris ballots x2, Otto wall+slate answers. LESSON: deck-count assertions must be verified aloud before stating -- t81 cost the whole endgame's credibility.
speak round 678s
Game over, liberal win via fifth blue in R6. Post-game window: one short remark allowed. Nadia already pointed the table at Ines, so repeating that adds nothing. New value: name the specific debts Ines never settled (the R3 receipt Lena audited at t73, three windows of demands, never paid; the t81 'six liberals printed' fabrication that stands unretracted while Marek paid a full retraction for his lesser error), and flag Tomas, who disclosed nothing all game and was never opened. Keep it to two sentences, first person, in character.
GAME OVER lib win R6 (Nadia/Lena 7-3). FINAL REMARK PAID: R3 receipt = received F+L off Rosa's sworn F-F-L, binned F, enacted L -- corroborates Rosa, closes Lena t73 audit; deflected lone-red onto Marek's enactment choice (privately known Liberal via peek). COVER HELD: never named Rosa/Pavel/Tomas; t81 kept as sloppy-miscount frame, not re-litigated. ATTACKS LEFT UNANSWERED BY DESIGN: Otto's forgery-floor meter (already dismantled by Pavel/Greta), Nadia's stall charge (R6 nein lost 6-4, stalled nothing). OPEN DEBTS MOOT: Boris pick-a-sheet, Greta+Boris ballots x2, Otto wall/slate answers. LESSON: verify deck counts aloud before asserting -- t81 cost endgame credibility.