Player 2 (Rosa)

R1 pre-nom. Cover=Liberal. Team: Ines(3), Pavel(7); Hitler=Tomas(8). On record (mine): asked Boris for nominee+reasoning -- STILL UNANSWERED, he owes me. New this window: Lena pledged vote to Boris + extended 'binding 2-card reveal' terms to Otto; Otto earlier called words cheap. My move: spoke urgency1 -- endorsed pledge applying to ANY government incl. Otto, re-pinged Boris for a named lean. Watch: Boris's nominee pick, vote split, whether Otto accepts binding terms, anyone overdefending teammates early. No suspicions yet. Do NOT repeat pledge point next window; if floor free again and nothing new, go silent.

R1 pre-vote. Cover=Liberal. Team: Ines(3), Pavel(7); Hitler=Tomas(8). On record (mine): endorsed 2-card-reveal pledge applying to ANY gov incl. Otto; re-pinged Boris for nominee reasoning -- STILL UNANSWERED, he owes me. This window: stayed silent -- nothing new, pledge point already made, told self not to repeat it. Watch: vote result Boris/Lena; does Otto accept binding terms; anyone overdefending teammates R1. No suspicions yet. If directly asked role/cards later: specific confident Liberal claim.

R1 pre-vote. Cover=Liberal. Team: Ines(3), Pavel(7); Hitler=Tomas(8). On record: endorsed 2-card-reveal pledge (ANY gov incl. Otto); pinged Boris twice for nominee reasoning -- STILL UNANSWERED, he owes me. This window: spoke once -- told table I lean Ja on Boris/Lena absent red flags, pushed toward voting. Plan: vote JA (normal liberal R1; neither is teammate; obstruction looks worse). Watch: Lena accept Marek's pledge? Boris answer? Vote result. Who overdefends teammates R1. No suspicions yet. If directly asked role/cards later: specific confident Liberal claim.

R1 pre-vote. Cover=Liberal. Team: Ines(3), Pavel(7); Hitler=Tomas(8). On record: endorsed card-reveal pledge; pinged Boris x2 re nominee reasoning -- STILL UNANSWERED; stated lean-Ja on Boris/Lena, nudged toward vote. This window new: Boris pledged name-all-3 then discard+pair aloud; Lena accepted (incl. Marek's pledge); Otto blessed it. Transparency norm now live -- KEY: when any of us 4 fascists share a gov, pre-align hand stories or cross-check catches us. Plan: vote JA (normal liberal R1; neither is teammate; obstruction looks worse). Watch: does Boris ever answer me; vote result; who overdefends teammates R1. No suspicions yet. If asked role/cards later: specific confident Liberal claim.

R1 pre-vote. Cover=Liberal. Team: Ines(3), Pavel(7); Hitler=Tomas(8). On record so far: endorsed card-reveal pledge; pinged Boris x2 re nominee reasoning -- STILL UNANSWERED; stated lean-Ja. NEW this turn: backed Ines's forced-red commit ask (aimed at Lena), set 'single policy proves little / judge pattern' norm, confirmed JA. Live norms: Boris pledged name-all-3 then discard+pair aloud; Lena accepted (incl. Marek's pledge); Otto blessed. KEY: if any of us 4 ever share a gov, pre-align hand stories BEFORE transfer -- cross-check catches liars. Plan: JA this vote (normal liberal R1; neither Boris nor Lena is teammate; obstruction looks worse). Watch: does Boris ever answer my pings; vote result; Lena commits yes/no; who overdefends teammates R1. No suspicions yet. If asked role/cards later: specific confident Liberal claim.

R1 pre-vote. Cover=Liberal. Team: Ines(3), Pavel(7); Hitler=Tomas(8). On record: endorsed card-reveal pledge; pinged Boris x2 re why-Lena — UNANSWERED; backed Ines forced-red carve-out; set 'judge pattern not single policy' norm; THIS TURN: backed mixed-pair->liberal commit, confirmed JA, asked Boris answer why-Lena AFTER vote. Live norms: Boris pledged name-all-3 + discard/pair aloud; Lena accepted (incl Marek's pledge); Otto blessed; mixed-pair->liberal now pushed by Boris+me. KEY: pre-align hand stories w/ teammates BEFORE any shared-gov transfer. Plan: JA this vote — neither Boris nor Lena is teammate; passing R1 gov is normal, obstruction looks worse. Watch: does Lena accept mixed-pair commit; vote tally; who overdefends R1; whether Boris ever answers why-Lena. No suspicions yet. If asked role/cards later: specific confident Liberal claim.

R1 pre-vote. Cover=Liberal. Team: Ines(3), Pavel(7); Hitler=Tomas(8). On record: endorsed card-reveal pledge; pinged Boris x2 re why-Lena — UNANSWERED (owed post-vote); backed Ines forced-red carve-out; set 'judge pattern not single policy'; backed mixed-pair->liberal commit; confirmed JA; ACCEPTED co-own pledge: any gov I sit in, I co-own output. Live norms: Boris pledged name-all-3 + discard/pair aloud; Lena accepted (incl Marek's pledge); Otto blessed; co-own taken by Otto, Ines, Marek, ME. Co-own still owed by: Greta(4), Nadia(5), Pavel(7), Tomas(8) — watch who answers. KEY: pre-align hand stories w/ teammates BEFORE any shared-gov transfer. Plan: JA this vote — neither Boris nor Lena teammate; R1 obstruction looks worse. Watch: vote tally; who overdefends R1; does Boris ever answer why-Lena. No suspicions yet. If asked role/cards later: specific confident Liberal claim.

R1 pre-vote. Cover=Liberal. Team: Ines(3), Pavel(7); Hitler=Tomas(8). On record: endorsed card-reveal pledge; pinged Boris x2 re why-Lena UNANSWERED (decided owed post-vote); backed Ines forced-red carve-out; 'judge pattern not single policy'; backed mixed-pair->liberal commit; confirmed JA; ACCEPTED co-own pledge; NEW this turn: asked Lena to mirror pledge (announce pick + 1-line reason before enacting). Live norms: Boris pledged name-all-3 + discard/pair aloud; Lena accepted (incl Marek's pledge); Otto blessed; co-own taken by Otto, Ines, Marek, ME. Co-own owed by: Greta(4), Nadia(5), Pavel(7), Tomas(8). NOTE: Pavel is demanding others take co-own while not having taken it himself — do NOT spotlight this (teammate); defend him lightly only if someone attacks it. KEY: pre-align hand stories w/ teammates BEFORE any shared-gov card transfer. Plan: JA this vote — neither Boris nor Lena is a teammate; obstruction in R1 looks worse than compliance. Watch: vote tally; who overdefends R1; does Boris ever answer why-Lena; do Greta/Nadia give yes/no on co-own. No suspicions yet. If asked role/cards later: specific confident Liberal claim.

R1 pre-vote. Cover=Liberal. Team: Ines(3), Pavel(7); Hitler=Tomas(8). On record: endorsed card-reveal pledge; pinged Boris x2 why-Lena UNANSWERED (owed post-vote); backed Ines forced-red carve-out; 'judge pattern not single policy'; backed mixed-pair->liberal commit; confirmed JA; ACCEPTED co-own pledge; asked Lena mirror-pledge (announce pick+reason pre-enact). NEW t4: corrected Nadia — I DID sign co-own earlier (her unsigned-list wrong on me); nudged Pavel+Tomas to give their one word and kill the topic; Ja reaffirmed. Co-own status: signed = Otto, Ines, Marek, ME, Nadia(t1), Greta(t2). Owed: Pavel(7), Tomas(8). NOTE: Pavel pushed pledge w/o signing — do NOT spotlight; handled via light 'just sign it' nudge only. KEY: pre-align hand stories w/ teammates BEFORE any shared-gov card transfer. Plan: JA this vote — neither Boris nor Lena teammate; R1 obstruction worse than compliance. Watch: vote tally; who overdefends R1; does Boris ever answer why-Lena. No suspicions yet. If asked role/cards later: specific confident Liberal claim.

R1 VOTE. Cover=Liberal. Team: Ines(3), Pavel(7); Hitler=Tomas(8). Voted JA: neither P0(Boris)/P1(Lena) teammate; R1 obstruction worse than compliance. My prior-turn record: endorsed reveal pledges; pinged Boris x2 why-Lena UNANSWERED (owed post-vote); backed Ines forced-red carve-out + mixed-pair->enact-liberal commit; confirmed Ja; ACCEPTED co-own pledge; asked Lena mirror-pledge (announce pick+reason pre-enact). Co-own status: signed=Otto, Ines, Marek, Greta, Nadia, ME(per my records), Pavel(self-claimed t=123 after Nadia's miscount). Only Tomas(8) still unsigned by table's count — do NOT spotlight him. NOTE: Nadia t=117 listed me as unsigned — contradicts my own record; Pavel got same treatment. Drop topic, don't relitigate publicly; treat Nadia's ledgers as error-prone. Transcript shown omits my msgs — trust my own records for what I've said aloud; avoid repeating points I already made. KEY: pre-align hand stories w/ teammates BEFORE any shared-gov card transfer (esp. if me/Ines/Pavel/Tomas ever share a gov). Watch: R1 vote tally; who overdefends the outcome; whether Boris ever answers why-Lena (he owes me). If later asked role/cards: specific confident Liberal claim.

R1 DONE: Boris(P0)+Lena(P1) -> LIB, tracker 0/3. Cover=Liberal. Team: Ines(3), Pavel(7), Hitler=Tomas(8). MADE OUT LOUD (do NOT repeat): endorsed reveal pledges; why-Lena pinged Boris x3 (x2 unanswered, this turn reframed as pattern-of-skipped-answers); backed forced-red carve-out + mixed-pair->enact-liberal commit; accepted co-own pledge; precedent-risk flag on letter-sliding; THIS TURN: proposed full-chain protocol (P names 3 + names discard, C confirms pair matches + names own discard before enacting), framed as making Greta's carve-out safe + telling Lena pledge costs her nothing. Co-own signed: Otto,Ines,Marek,Greta,Nadia,Pavel,ME; Tomas(8) ONLY unsigned -- keep zero spotlight on him. NEW INFO: Otto t=3 says Pavel never spoke in first open window (speakers: Lena,Boris,Otto only); pre-vote Pavel only pushed Greta+Nadia to sign. Pavel apparently overclaimed speaking. NOT touching publicly -- defending him reflexively = risk; watch if he self-corrects. Greta t=1 pressing Lena on blanket-hang carve-out; Nadia t=2 wants president naming 3 before discard -- I extended her rule. OWED: Boris why-Lena still unanswered (3rd ask). WATCH: Lena response to chain pledge; who overdefends Boris/Lena gov; Tomas co-own silence (private note only). KEY: pre-align hand stories w/ teammates BEFORE any shared-gov card transfer. If pressed on role/cards: specific confident LIBERAL claim.

R1 DONE: Boris(P0)+Lena(P1)->LIB, tracker 0/3. Cover=Liberal. Team: Ines(3), Pavel(7), H=Tomas(8). THIS TURN: SIGNED co-own (same standard as Greta/Nadia). FLAGGED Boris arithmetic slip: he claims drew LFF, discarded F, Lena announced L+F -> start 11L/6F (17 total = 14 draw + 2 dsc + 1 enacted confirms) minus 1L enacted minus 2F discards = 10L/4F TEN-FOUR, but he said NINE-FIVE. 9-5 only reachable if a discard was Liberal => his hand story or Lena's announcement is wrong. Demanded corrected restatement. MADE OUT LOUD (do NOT repeat): endorsed reveal pledges; why-Lena pinged Boris x3 (unanswered, framed as pattern-of-skipped-answers); backed forced-red carve-out + mixed-pair->enact-liberal commit; proposed full-chain protocol (P names 3+discard, C confirms pair+naming discard pre-enact); precedent-risk flag on letter-sliding; co-own accepted->now SIGNED; Boris count contradiction. Co-own signed: Otto,Ines,Marek,Greta,Nadia,Pavel,Rosa. Tomas(8) LAST unsigned -- ZERO spotlight, never mention him on it. NEW INFO: Otto t3 says Pavel never spoke in first open window (speakers: Lena,Boris,Otto only); Pavel overclaimed speaking. NOT touching publicly -- reflexive defense = risk; watch self-correction. OWED: Boris why-Lena (x3) + corrected deck count (new demand). WATCH: Boris fixes vs doubles-down (doubling-down => he lied about discard OR Lena's announcement mismatches => Liberal-on-Liberal chaos, good for us); Lena response to chain pledge; who overdefends Boris/Lena gov; Tomas silence = private note only. KEY: pre-align hand stories w/ teammates BEFORE any shared-gov card transfer. If pressed on role/cards: specific confident LIBERAL claim.

R1 DONE: Boris(P0)+Lena(P1)->LIB, tracker 0/3. Deck NOW 5L/9F (start 6L/11F, minus 1L enacted, 2F discards; board 14draw/2discard confirms). Cover=Liberal. Team: Ines(3), Pavel(7), H=Tomas(8). THIS TURN: SIGNED co-own (was genuinely blank per Nadia t117+Boris t53 — old note claiming I'd signed was WRONG, transcript shows I never spoke until now). Independently CONFIRMED deck math 5-9, closing Marek's ten-four-or-nine-five Q. KILL OLD NOTE'S ARITHMETIC: 'ten-four' assumed inverted deck (11L/6F). Real deck 6L/11F => Boris's nine-five CORRECT. Never raise ten-four. UNSIGNED: Tomas(8) likely LAST on co-own — DO NOT mention him, zero spotlight, his silence is his own. OPEN: Lena owes Nadia(t24) pre-commit to name 3 aloud before discard as next President — still unanswered; can press later if needed. WATCH: Pavel/Otto ledger spat resolved (Pavel conceded, signed properly). Greta+Nadia = math-driven liberal bloc. Ines pushing carve-out questions = good cover. Tomas silent ALL game — private note only, never flag publicly. KEY: pre-align hand stories w/ teammates BEFORE any shared-gov transfer. If pressed on role/cards: specific confident LIBERAL claim. Never invent hands for rounds whose vote failed (none yet).

R1 DONE: Boris(P0)+Lena(P1)->LIB, tracker 0/3. Deck NOW 5L/9F (start 6L/11F; 1L enacted, 2F discards; 14draw/2discard checks out). Cover=Liberal. Team: Ines(3), Pavel(7), H=Tomas(8). SAID THIS TURN (do not repeat): (a) independently verified Boris/Lena mesh => deck 5L/9F, 'audit closed clean'; (b) prefer judging next gov by OUTPUT over more pledges; Ja cheap. UNSIGNED on co-own: Tomas(8) ONLY — NEVER flag him publicly; his silence is his own. If someone calls his name, stay quiet. OPEN (not mine): Lena owes Nadia(t24) pre-commit to name 3 drawn aloud before discard as next Pres; Lena owes Greta(t20) carve-out acceptance (two named reds = deck luck). Both unanswered — may press LATER only if useful, framed fresh. POINTS ALREADY ON RECORD FROM ME: co-own signature (t56); 5-9 verification; anti-extra-ceremony stance. NEXT PRES: Lena(P1) by rotation; cannot nominate herself; watch her chancellor pick + whether she takes naming pledge unprompted. WATCH: Marek = aggressive auditor (liberal-hawk); Otto procedural hawk; Greta+Nadia math bloc (compute odds fast). Pavel/Otto ledger spat RESOLVED (Pavel conceded, signed). KEY HABITS: pre-align hand stories w/ teammates BEFORE any shared-gov transfer; if pressed on role/cards => specific confident LIBERAL claim; never invent hands for failed-vote rounds (none yet); no power claims until F3 actually enacted.

R1 DONE: P0+P1->LIB, tracker 0/3. Deck NOW 5L/9F (14draw/2discard checks out). Cover=Liberal. Team: Ines(3), Pavel(7), H=Tomas(8). SAID THIS WINDOW (never repeat): (a) co-own terms signed by name (t56); (b) independent mesh check => deck 5L/9F, 'audit closed clean' (t62); (c) output-over-extra-pledges stance. UNSIGNED co-own: Tomas(8) ONLY — NEVER flag him publicly; if someone calls his name, stay silent. OPEN (owed by others): Lena owes Nadia(t24) pre-commit to name all 3 drawn cards aloud before discard as next Pres; Lena owes Greta(t20) acceptance of two-named-reds=deck-luck carve-out. Both unanswered. Press LATER only if tactically useful, framed fresh, not as repetition. NEXT PRES: Lena(P1) by rotation; cannot nominate herself; watch her chancellor pick + does she take naming pledge unprompted. WATCH: Marek = aggressive auditor/hawk; Otto = procedural hawk; Greta+Nadia = fast math bloc. Pavel/Otto ledger spat RESOLVED (Pavel conceded, signed co-own). HABITS: pre-align hand stories w/ teammates BEFORE any shared-gov transfer; if pressed on role/cards => specific confident LIBERAL claim, invent hand only if needed and keep consistent; never invent hands for failed-vote rounds (none yet); no power claims until F3 actually enacted. STYLE NOTE: passed after 2 remarks — audit theater dying down favors us; don't revive it.

R1 DONE: P0+P1 -> LIB enacted, tracker 0/3. Deck NOW 5L/9F (14draw+2discard checks out). Cover=Liberal. Team: Ines(3), Pavel(7), H=Tomas(8). SAID THIS WINDOW (never repeat): (a) co-own terms signed by my name (t1); (b) independent deck mesh check => 5L/9F, 'audit closed clean' (t2). UNSIGNED co-own: Tomas(8) ONLY -- NEVER flag him publicly; if someone calls his name, stay silent. OPEN (owed by others): Lena owes Nadia(t24) pre-commit to name all 3 drawn cards aloud before discard as next Pres; Lena owes Greta(t20) acceptance of two-named-reds=deck-luck carve-out. Both unanswered. Press LATER only if tactically useful, framed fresh. NEXT PRES: Lena(P1) by rotation; cannot nominate herself; watch her chancellor pick + does she take naming pledge unprompted. WATCH: Marek=aggressive auditor/hawk; Otto=procedural hawk; Greta+Nadia=fast math bloc. Pavel/Otto ledger spat RESOLVED (Pavel conceded, signed co-own). HABITS: pre-align hand stories w/ teammates BEFORE any shared-gov transfer; if pressed on role/cards => specific confident LIBERAL claim, invent hand only if needed and keep consistent; never claim hands for failed-vote rounds; no power claims until F3 actually enacted. STYLE: spoke twice then passed -- audit theater dying down favors us, do not revive. Silent rest of window unless Tomas gets named or Ines/Pavel come under real fire.

R2 PRE-NOM. Board: R1 P0(Boris)+P1(Lena)->LIB, tracker 0/3, deck 5L/9F (audit closed, do NOT reopen). Cover=Liberal. Team: Ines(3), Pavel(7), H=Tomas(8). SAID THIS WINDOW: t1 co-own signed; t2 mesh audit 5L/9F 'audit closed clean'; t3 closed Marek item + backed Boris reaffirm + Lena naming pick pre-ballot; NEWEST: ACCEPTED Otto's full pledge pkg ON RECORD (as Pres: name 3 drawn pre-discard + name chancellor pre-ballot; as Chancellor: reveal both received pre-enact) + deck-luck caveat ('three fascists = deck not confession') + endorsed Otto's nominee-must-lock-terms-first condition. TOMAS RULE: never flag OR defend him; Otto poked his silence (mild, t3) — stayed off it, keep off unless real accusation escalates. Marek: retracted deck count earlier (holds 11F, pile locks 5L/9F); cred dented — don't pile on, let him dig. Otto: procedural hawk doing our work; his conditions now bind ME too — honor them visibly when I preside R3. NEXT PRES: Lena(P1); eligible chancellors = all except Boris+Lena; I preside after her. WATCH her pick + whether she takes naming pledge unprompted; if she offers me chancellorship => lean ACCEPT (trust + gov seat). OWED BY OTHERS: Lena owes Nadia(t24) 3-card-naming pre-commit as next Pres; Lena owes Greta(t20) two-named-fascists carve-out acceptance. Both unanswered — press LATER only if tactically useful, framed fresh. Greta+Nadia = fast-math bloc, sharp — build rapport, expect scrutiny later. Pavel/Otto ledger spat RESOLVED. GOODWILL BANKED: Nadia covered me vs Marek fallback; Otto confirmed my audit correct. HABITS: pre-align hand stories w/ teammates BEFORE shared-gov transfer; pressed on role/cards => specific confident LIBERAL claim, invent hand only if needed, stay consistent; never claim hands for failed-vote rounds; no power claims until F3 actually enacted. STYLE: spoke 4x this window — go quiet after this unless direct question hits me or Ines/Pavel/Tomas come under real fire.

R2 PRE-BALLOT. Board: R1 P0(Boris)+P1(Lena)->LIB, tracker 0/3, deck 5L/9F (audit CLOSED, don't reopen). Cover=Liberal. Team: Ines(3), Pavel(7), H=Tomas(8). SAID THIS WINDOW (5x): t1 co-own signed; t2 mesh audit 5L/9F 'closed clean'; t3 closed Marek item + backed Boris + Lena pick pre-ballot; t4 ACCEPTED Otto pledge pkg ON RECORD (as Pres: name 3 drawn pre-discard; as Chan: reveal both received pre-enact) + deck-luck caveat ('three F = deck not confession') + endorsed lock-terms-first; t5 NEWEST: terms bind me too, asked table for Ja on receipts. TOMAS RULE: never flag OR defend him; Otto poked his silence mildly - stayed off it, keep off unless real accusation escalates. Marek: retracted deck count earlier, cred dented - no pile-on, let him dig. Otto: procedural hawk doing our work; his conditions bind ME - honor visibly when I preside R3 (rotation: P0->P1->me, assuming this gov resolves). IF ELECTED CHAN: hope mixed hand; 1L1F => consider enacting L for cover; 2F => reveal per pledge, lean on deck-luck caveat. Pre-align hand story w/ Lena? NO - she's not team; just stay consistent. R3 MY PRESIDENCY: eligible chans = all except me + Lena(term limit). Options: Ines(teammate seat), Otto(rapport/credibility), avoid spotlighting Tomas while F-count=0. Decide next window based on who defended/attacked this gov. OWED BY OTHERS: Lena owes Nadia(t24) 3-card-naming pre-commit; owes Greta(t20) two-fascist carve-out acceptance. Both unanswered - press LATER only if tactically useful, framed fresh. Greta+Nadia: fast-math bloc, sharp - build rapport, expect scrutiny. GOODWILL BANKED: Nadia covered me vs Marek fallback; Otto confirmed my audit correct. HABITS: pressed on role/cards => specific confident LIBERAL claim, invent hand only if needed, stay consistent; never claim hands for failed-vote rounds; no power claims until F3 enacted; corroborate teammate hand stories, never contradict. STYLE: spoke 5x this window - HARD SILENCE now unless direct question or teammate under real fire.

R2 PRE-BALLOT. Board: R1 P0(Boris)+P1(Lena)->LIB, tracker 0/3, deck 5L/9F (audit CLOSED, don't reopen). Cover=Liberal. Team: Ines(3), Pavel(7), H=Tomas(8). THIS WINDOW: 5 prior utterances (endorsed co-sign; mesh audit 5L/9F 'closed clean'; backed Boris + Lena pick pre-ballot; ACCEPTED Otto pledge pkg ON RECORD [as Pres: name 3 drawn pre-discard; as Chan: reveal both received pre-enact] + deck-luck caveat 'three F = deck not confession' + lock-terms-first; terms bind me too, asked table for Ja). t6 NOW: INTERRUPTED Greta — she claimed I 'never signed' the disclosure package. FALSE premise: I accepted the pledge publicly (t4); her signer list (Lena/Otto/Nadia/Marek) is the PRE-sign group, predates my acceptance. Reframe: judge me by pledge compliance, not signature timing. Safe correction — my acceptance is transcript-checkable. TOMAS RULE: never flag OR defend him; Otto poked his silence mildly — stayed off it. Marek: retracted deck count earlier, cred dented — no pile-on. Otto: procedural hawk doing our work; his conditions bind ME — honor visibly when I preside R3 (rotation P0->P1->me assuming this gov resolves). IF ELECTED CHAN: mixed hand (1L1F) => consider enacting L for cover; 2F => must enact F, lean on deck-luck caveat. Story stays consistent with pledge: reveal both, then explain choice. R3 MY PRESIDENCY: eligible chans = all except me + Lena(term limit). Options: Ines(teammate), Otto(rapport/credibility). Avoid spotlighting Tomas while F-count=0. Decide next window based on who attacked/defended this gov. OWED BY OTHERS: Lena owes Nadia(t24) 3-card-naming pre-commit; owes Greta(t20) two-fascist carve-out acceptance. Both unanswered — press LATER only if tactically useful, framed fresh. GOODWILL BANKED: Nadia covered me vs Marek fallback; Otto confirmed my audit correct. HABITS: pressed on role/cards => specific confident LIBERAL claim, invent hand only if needed, stay consistent; never claim hands for failed-vote rounds; no power claims until F3 enacted; corroborate teammate hand stories, never contradict. STYLE: 6 utterances this window now — HARD SILENCE unless direct question or teammate under real fire.

R2 PRE-BALLOT. Board: R1 P0(Boris)+P1(Lena)->LIB, tracker 0/3, deck 5L/9F (audit CLOSED, don't reopen). Cover=Liberal. Team: Ines(3), Pavel(7), H=Tomas(8). PLEDGE STATUS: accepted ON RECORD earlier this window (as Chan: reveal both received pre-enact; as Pres: name 3 drawn pre-discard; mixed pair -> Liberal) + deck-luck caveat 'three F = deck not confession'. THIS TURN: reaffirmed to Boris verbatim, told him his Ja condition is met; corrected Greta — her signer list predates my acceptance, 'never signed' is stale. TOMAS RULE: never flag OR defend him; Otto poked his silence once — stayed off it. Marek: retracted deck count earlier, cred dented — no pile-on. Otto: procedural hawk doing our work; his conditions bind ME — honor visibly when I preside R3. IF ELECTED CHAN: pledge binds — mixed hand (1L1F) => reveal + enact L for cover; 2F => enact F under deck-luck caveat. Story stays consistent with pledge: reveal both, then explain choice. R3 MY PRESIDENCY: eligible chans = all except me + Lena(term limit). Candidates: Ines(teammate), Otto(rapport/credibility). Avoid spotlighting Tomas while F-count=0. Decide next window based on who attacked/defended this gov. OWED BY OTHERS: Lena owes Nadia(t24) 3-card-naming pre-commit; owes Greta(t20) two-fascist carve-out acceptance. Press LATER only if tactically useful, framed fresh. GOODWILL BANKED: Nadia covered me vs Marek fallback; Otto confirmed my audit correct. HABITS: pressed on role/cards => specific confident LIBERAL claim, invent hand only if needed, stay consistent; never claim hands for failed-vote rounds; no power claims until F3 enacted; corroborate teammate hand stories, never contradict. STYLE: 7 utterances this window — HARD SILENCE unless direct question or teammate under real fire.

R2 PRE-BALLOT. Board: 1L/0F, tracker 0/3, deck 5L/9F (audit CLOSED, don't reopen). Cover=Liberal. Team: Ines(3), Pavel(7), H=Tomas(8). PLEDGE STATUS: full package signed ON RECORD (as Chan: reveal both received pre-enact; as Pres: name 3 drawn pre-discard; mixed->Liberal; 3F=deck-luck caveat). Reaffirmed to Boris -> his Ja condition met. Corrected Greta: her signer list predates my signature, stale. ALL direct Qs to me answered; no pending debts owed TO me. THIS TURN: PASSED - nothing new to add, repetition banned. VOTE OUTLOOK: expect pass. IF ELECTED CHAN: mixed hand => reveal both + enact L (cover gold, board 2L/0F); 2F => enact F under deck-luck caveat (~36% from 5L/9F). Keep story exactly consistent with pledge either way. R3 MY PRESIDENCY: eligible chans = all except me + Lena(term limit). Shortlist: Ines(teammate) or Otto(hawk, high credibility). Never spotlight Tomas while F-count=0. Pick after seeing who attacked/defended this gov. OWED BY OTHERS: Lena owes Nadia(R1-post t24) 3-card-naming precommit; owes Greta(R1-post) 2-fascist carve-out acceptance. Press LATER only if tactically useful, framed fresh. GOODWILL BANKED: Nadia covered me vs Marek fallback; Otto confirmed my 5L/9F audit correct. Marek self-retracted deck math - cred dented, NO pile-on from me. HABITS: pressed on role/cards => specific confident LIBERAL claim, invent hand only if needed, stay consistent; never claim hands for failed-vote rounds; no power claims until F3 enacted; corroborate teammate hand stories, never contradict. STYLE: hard silence default; speak only on direct question or teammate under real fire.

R2 PRE-BALLOT. Board: 1L/0F, tracker 0/3, deck 5L/9F (audit CLOSED). Cover=Liberal. Team: Ines(3), Pavel(7), H=Tomas(8). PLEDGE STATUS: FULL PACKAGE SIGNED this window (chan: reveal both received pre-enact + mixed->L; pres: name 3 drawn pre-discard; anchored to Nadia/Greta 2F-deck-luck carve-out). Co-own signed R1-post. All direct Qs to me answered; no debts owed TO me. VOTE OUTLOOK: expect pass. IF ELECTED CHAN: mixed hand => reveal both, enact L (board 2L/0F, cover gold); 2F => enact F under deck-luck caveat (~40% from 5L/9F). Story must match pledge exactly either way. R3 MY PRESIDENCY: eligible chans = all except me + Lena(term limit). Shortlist: Ines(teammate) or Otto(hawk, high credibility). Never spotlight Tomas while F-count=0. OWED BY OTHERS: Lena owes Nadia 3-card-naming precommit (R1-post t24); owes Greta 2F carve-out acceptance (R1-post t20); owes Otto+Greta REASON for picking unsigned me (R2-pre t5/t20) — listen to her answer, could spotlight me. GOODWILL BANKED: Nadia covered me vs Marek fallback; Otto confirmed my 5L/9F audit correct. Marek retracted own math twice — cred dented, NO pile-on from me. POINTS ALREADY MADE (don't repeat): co-own signing; 5L/9F audit-closed arithmetic; package signature this window. HABITS: pressed on role/cards => specific confident LIBERAL claim, invent hand only if needed, stay consistent; never claim hands for failed-vote rounds; no power claims until F3 enacted; corroborate teammate hand stories, never contradict. STYLE: hard silence default; speak only on direct question or teammate under real fire.

R2 PRE-BALLOT. 1L/0F, tracker 0/3, draw 5L/9F (audit closed, Otto-endorsed). Cover=Liberal. Team: Ines(3), Pavel(7), H=Tomas(8). PLEDGE: FULL PACKAGE SIGNED this window (chan: name both received pre-enact + mixed->L; pres: name 3 drawn pre-discard; carve-out: 2 named reds = deck luck, anchored to Nadia/Greta). THIS TURN: corrected Otto's stale premise (his press came t=1, my signature t=2); completed my clipped carve-out sentence; handed Lena the floor on 'why nominate the unsigned player' — HER answer still pending, LISTEN to it, could spotlight me. VOTE OUTLOOK: expect pass. IF ELECTED CHAN: mixed hand -> reveal both, enact L (board 2L/0F, gold cover); pure 2F -> enact F citing carve-out (~40%). Story must match pledge exactly either way. R3 MY PRESIDENCY: eligible chans = everyone except me + Lena(term limit). Shortlist: Ines(teammate) or Otto(hawk credibility). NEVER spotlight Tomas while F-count=0. OWED BY OTHERS: Lena owes Nadia 3-card-naming precommit (R1-post t24); owes Greta 2F carve-out acceptance (t20); owes Otto+Greta reason for picking me (R2-pre t5/t20). GOODWILL BANKED: Nadia covered me vs Marek fallback; Otto confirmed my 5L/9F audit. Marek retracted own math twice — cred dented, NO pile-on from me. ON RECORD ALREADY (don't repeat): co-owned signing; 5L/9F arithmetic; package signature; Otto timing-correction; carve-out completion. HABITS: direct Q on role/cards -> specific confident LIBERAL claim, invent hand only if needed, stay consistent; never claim hands for failed-vote rounds; no power claims until F3 enacted; corroborate teammate hand stories, never contradict. STYLE: back to hard silence after this; speak only on direct question or teammate under real fire.

R2 PRE-BALLOT. 1L/0F, tracker 0/3, draw 5L/9F (audit closed, Otto-endorsed). Cover=Liberal. Team: Ines(3), Pavel(7), H=Tomas(8). PLEDGE (mine, live): FULL PACKAGE SIGNED this window — chan: name both received cards pre-enact + mixed->L; pres: name 3 drawn pre-discard; carve-out: 2 named reds = deck luck, anchored to Nadia/Greta. THIS TURN: stayed SILENT. Marek holds floor urg3 pressing LENA (3-card naming + unanswered Nadia-t24 / Ines-relay). Not my fire; my signature already on record, restating = repetition. WATCH Lena's reply — if she dodges again, exposure is hers. VOTE OUTLOOK: expect pass. IF ELECTED CHAN: mixed hand -> reveal both, enact L (board 2L/0F, gold cover); pure 2F -> enact F citing carve-out (~40%). Story must match pledge exactly either way. R3 MY PRESIDENCY: eligible chans = all except me + Lena(term-lim). Shortlist: Ines(teammate) or Otto(hawk cred). NEVER spotlight Tomas while F-count=0. OWED BY OTHERS: Lena owes Nadia 3-card-naming precommit (R1-post t24); owes Greta 2F carve-out acceptance (t20); owes Otto+Greta reason for picking me (R2-pre t5/t20). Marek now piling on too — pressure on her suits me, no need to add voice. GOODWILL BANKED: Nadia covered me vs Marek fallback; Otto confirmed my 5L/9F audit. Marek retracted own math twice — cred dented, NO pile-on from me. ON RECORD ALREADY (don't repeat): co-owned signing; 5L/9F arithmetic; package signature; Otto timing-correction; carve-out completion. HABITS: direct Q on role/cards -> specific confident LIBERAL claim, invent hand only if needed, stay consistent; never claim hands for failed-vote rounds; no power claims until F3 enacted; corroborate teammate hand stories, never contradict. STYLE: hard silence default; speak only on direct question or teammate under real fire.

R2 PRE-BALLOT. 1L/0F, tracker 0/3, draw 5L/9F (audit closed, Otto-endorsed). Cover=Liberal. Team: Ines(3), Pavel(7), H=Tomas(8). PLEDGE (mine, live): FULL PACKAGE SIGNED — chan: name both received cards pre-enact + mixed->L; pres: name 3 drawn pre-discard; carve-out: 2 named reds = deck luck, anchored to Nadia/Greta. THIS TURN: stayed SILENT. Marek urg3 + Nadia t61 both pressing LENA for 3-card-naming commit. Pressure on Lena suits me; adding my voice risks bloc-look with M+N. Watch Lena's reply — if she dodges, exposure is hers. VOTE OUTLOOK: expect pass. IF ELECTED CHAN: mixed hand -> reveal both, enact L (2L/0F gold cover); pure 2F -> enact F citing carve-out (~40%). Story must match pledge exactly either way. R3 MY PRESIDENCY: eligible chans = all except me + Lena(term-lim). Shortlist: Ines(teammate) or Otto(hawk cred). NEVER spotlight Tomas while F-count=0. OWED BY OTHERS: Lena owes Nadia+Marek 3-card-naming commit (t24/t61); owes Greta 2F carve-out acceptance (t20); owes Otto+Greta reason for picking me (R2-pre t5/t20). GOODWILL BANKED: Nadia covered me vs Marek fallback; Otto confirmed 5L/9F audit. Marek retracted own math twice — cred dented, NO pile-on from me. ON RECORD ALREADY (don't repeat): co-owned signing; 5L/9F arithmetic; package signature; Otto timing-correction; carve-out completion. HABITS: direct Q on role/cards -> specific confident LIBERAL claim, invent hand only if needed, stay consistent; never claim hands for failed-vote rounds; no power claims until F3 enacted; corroborate teammate hand stories, never contradict. STYLE: hard silence default; speak only on direct question or teammate under real fire.

R2 PRE-BALLOT. 1L/0F, tracker 0/3, draw 5L/9F (audit closed, Otto-endorsed). Cover=Liberal. Team: Ines(3), Pavel(7), H=Tomas(8). PLEDGE (live): FULL PACKAGE SIGNED — chan(me): name both received cards pre-enact + mixed->L; pres(Lena): name 3 drawn pre-discard; carve-out: 2 named reds = deck luck, anchored to Nadia/Greta. NEW THIS WINDOW: Lena t2 gave pick-reason for me (unprompted 5-9 arithmetic + instant package signing) — her 'owe Rosa a reason' debt PAID. Greta caught Lena misciting ledger (Greta never retracted; her t93 Otto-correction stands) — minor Lena cred dent; I stay OUT of that fight, no pile-on, no defense. INES t1 closed Otto's Nein condition herself ('before ballots' expired once I signed pres half) — teammate covering me; do NOT echo her, avoid bloc-look. PRESSURE LIVE: Marek urg3 + Nadia t61 want Lena's 3-card-naming commit; if she dodges, exposure is hers. My voice added would read as M+N+me bloc — hold silence. VOTE OUTLOOK: pass likely. IF ELECTED CHAN: mixed hand -> reveal both, enact L (gold cover, board 2L/0F); pure 2F -> enact F citing carve-out (~40%). Story matches pledge exactly either way. NEVER claim hands for failed-vote rounds. R3 MY PRESIDENCY (if passed): chans eligible = all except me + Lena(term-lim). Shortlist: Ines(teammate) or Otto(hawk cred). NEVER spotlight Tomas while F-count=0. OWED STILL: Lena -> 3-card-naming commit (Marek/Nadia). Watch if Greta accepts 2F carve-out (her t20 ask). GOODWILL BANKED: Nadia covered me vs Marek fallback; Otto confirmed audit; Marek double math-retraction — no pile-on from me. ON RECORD (don't repeat): co-owned signing; 5L/9F arithmetic; package signature; Otto timing-correction; carve-out completion. HABITS: direct Q on role/cards -> specific confident LIBERAL claim, invent hand only if needed, stay consistent; no power claims until F3 enacted; corroborate teammate hand stories, never contradict. STYLE: hard silence default; speak only on direct question or teammate under real fire.

R2 PRE-BALLOT. 1L/0F, tracker 0/3, draw 5L/9F (audit closed, Otto-endorsed). Cover=Liberal. Team: Ines(3), Pavel(7), H=Tomas(8). PLEDGE NOW COMPLETE: chan(me)=name both received cards pre-enact + mixed->L; pres(Lena)=name 3 drawn pre-discard; pres(me)=name chan pick BEFORE BALLOTS — confirmed this window per Nadia/Otto ask, file CLOSED. Carve-out: 2 named reds = deck luck, anchored Nadia/Greta. INES earlier closed Otto's Nein-condition herself (expiry argument) — did NOT echo her, kept bloc-distance. Continue: never parrot teammate lines. Lena t1 self-corrected Greta miscite (Greta never retracted). Stayed out of that fight — no pile-on, no defense. VOTE OUTLOOK: pass likely. IF ELECTED CHAN: mixed hand -> reveal both, enact L (gold cover, 2L/0F); pure 2F -> enact F citing carve-out (~40%). Story must match pledge exactly either way. NEVER claim hands for failed-vote rounds. R3 MY PRESIDENCY (if passed): eligible chans = all except me + Lena(term-lim). Shortlist: Ines(teammate) or Otto(hawk cred). NEVER spotlight Tomas while F-count=0. OWED STILL: Lena 3-card-naming commit under Marek urg3 + Nadia t61 pressure — if she dodges, exposure is hers; my voice added = M+N+me bloc, hold silence. GOODWILL BANKED: Nadia covered me vs Marek fallback; Otto confirmed audit; Marek double math-retraction — no pile-on from me. ON RECORD (do NOT repeat): co-owned signing; 5L/9F arithmetic; package signature; Otto timing-correction; carve-out completion; pre-ballot-pick confirmation (this window). HABITS: direct Q on role/cards -> specific confident LIBERAL claim, invent hand only if needed, stay consistent; no power claims until F3 enacted; corroborate teammate hand stories, never contradict. STYLE: hard silence default; speak only on direct question or teammate under real fire.

R2 PRE-BALLOT. 1L/0F, tracker 0/3, draw 5L/9F (audit closed, Otto-endorsed). Cover=Liberal. Team: Ines(3), Pavel(7), H=Tomas(8). PLEDGE COMPLETE incl. pres-me=chan pick BEFORE BALLOTS -- CONFIRMED OUT LOUD this window (answered Nadia t75/Otto t80); file CLOSED. Carve-out anchored: 2 named reds = deck luck. INES closed Otto's Nein-expiry argument herself -- rule: never echo teammate lines. Lena self-corrected Greta miscite; stayed out of that fight. VOTE: Ja stated on record. IF ELECTED CHAN: mixed hand -> reveal both, enact L (gold cover, 2L/0F); pure 2F -> enact F citing carve-out (~40%). Story must match pledge exactly either way. NEVER claim hands for failed-vote rounds. R3 MY PRESIDENCY (if passed): eligible chans = all except me + Lena(term-lim). Shortlist: Ines(teammate) or Otto(hawk cred). NEVER spotlight Tomas while F-count=0. OWED STILL: Lena 3-card-naming commit under Marek urg3 + Nadia t44 pressure -- if she dodges, exposure is hers; my voice added = M+N+me bloc, hold silence. GOODWILL BANKED: Nadia covered me vs Marek fallback; Otto confirmed audit; Marek double math-retraction -- no pile-on from me. ON RECORD (do NOT repeat): co-owned signing; 5L/9F arithmetic; package signature; Otto timing-correction; carve-out completion; pre-ballot-pick confirmation (this window); Ja ballot. HABITS: direct Q on role/cards -> specific confident LIBERAL claim, invent hand only if needed, stay consistent; no power claims until F3 enacted; corroborate teammate hand stories, never contradict. STYLE: hard silence default; speak only on direct question or teammate under real fire.

R2 PRE-BALLOT. 1L/0F, tracker 0/3, draw 5L/9F (audit closed, Otto-endorsed). Cover=Liberal. Team: Ines(3), Pavel(7), H=Tomas(8). PLEDGE COMPLETE incl. pres-me=chan pick BEFORE BALLOTS (confirmed t2 this window); file CLOSED. Carve-out anchored: 2 named reds = deck luck. GRETA LOCK (t3): mutual burn-clause Lena+me — ACCEPTED this window: my 2 named cards must sit inside Lena's 3-minus-discard, mismatch burns both. Mechanically safe (truth always reconciles); transfers signature burden to Lena. NEVER walk back or hedge this later. Marek t1 attacks Lena's arithmetic standard — LEAVE IT: muddle helps us, do not defend nomination basis. INES closed Otto's Nein-expiry argument herself — rule: never echo teammate lines. VOTE: Ja on record. IF ELECTED CHAN: mixed hand -> reveal both, enact L (gold cover); pure 2F -> enact F citing carve-out (~40%). Story matches pledge either way. NEVER claim hands for failed-vote rounds. R3 MY PRESIDENCY (if passed): eligible chans = all except me + Lena(term-lim). Shortlist: Ines(teammate) or Otto(hawk cred). NEVER spotlight Tomas while F-count=0. OWED: Lena 3-card-naming commit (Marek urg3 + Nadia t44) — hold silence there; if she dodges, exposure is hers; don't join M+N pressure bloc. GOODWILL BANKED: Nadia covered me vs Marek fallback; Otto confirmed audit; Marek double math-retraction — no pile-on from me. ON RECORD (do NOT repeat): co-owned signing; 5L/9F arithmetic; package signature; Otto timing-fix; carve-out completion; pre-ballot-pick confirm; Ja ballot; Greta-lock acceptance (THIS WINDOW). HABITS: direct Q on role/cards -> specific confident LIBERAL claim, invent hand only if needed, stay consistent; no power claims until F3 enacted; corroborate teammate hand stories, never contradict. STYLE: hard silence default; speak only on direct question or teammate under real fire.

R2 BALLOT: Ja (declared t93 pre_vote — do NOT restate). IF ELECTED CHAN: Lena passes 2 from 5L/9F pile. P(pure2F)=~40%, P(mixed)=~49%, P(2L)=~11%. Mixed -> name BOTH aloud, enact L (gold cover). Pure 2F -> name both, enact F citing carve-out (2 named reds = deck luck, Greta+Nadia anchored). Story matches pledge either way. NEVER claim hands for failed-vote rounds. GRETA LOCK (t101, chased by Nadia t120): mutual mesh clause — my 2 named cards must sit inside Lena's named 3-minus-discard, reconciled aloud BEFORE any card touches board; mismatch burns BOTH. NOT YET SIGNED ALOUD BY ME. Sign first thing next window; mechanically safe (truth always reconciles), shifts signature burden to Lena. Never hedge or walk back. Marek t89 attacks Lena's arithmetic-based nomination rationale — LEAVE IT: muddle helps us, do not defend her basis. INES closed Otto's Nein-expiry argument herself — RULE: never echo teammate lines verbatim. R3 MY PRESIDENCY (if passed): eligible chans = all except me + Lena(term-lim). Shortlist: Ines(teammate) or Otto(hawk cred). NEVER spotlight Tomas while F-count=0. Package obligations as president: name all 3 drawn before discard, name chan pick BEFORE ballots. WATCH: does Lena actually name 3 cards aloud (pledged t112)? If she dodges, exposure is hers — don't join Marek/Nadia pressure bloc. GOODWILL BANKED: Nadia covered me vs Marek fallback; Otto confirmed my 5-9 audit and retracted his own ten-four; Marek double-retracted math errors — no pile-on from me. ON RECORD (do NOT repeat): co-own signing; 5L/9F arithmetic; full package signature incl. pre-ballot-pick confirm; carve-out completion; Ja ballot; 'audit closed clean' stamp (Otto-endorsed). TABLE READS: Tomas silent 3 windows, benched by Lena t144 until he signs co-own; Pavel caught misremembering signing window (Otto); Otto+Marek each retracted an arithmetic error; Greta's t93 correction stands unrevised. HABITS: direct Q on role/cards -> specific confident LIBERAL claim; invent hand only if needed, stay consistent; no power claims until F3 enacted; corroborate teammate hand stories, never contradict; hard silence default — speak only on direct question or teammate under real fire.

R2 CHAN DONE: named pair L+F aloud, enacted L (enact_0), discarded F — matches pledge, story LOCKED, never revise. MESH LOCK: signed aloud this turn. Lena owes: name all 3 drawn + discard (pledged t112). If she dodges, exposure is HERS — one clean callout max, don't join Marek/Nadia pile-on. PILE MATH: pre-R2 5L/9F (14). Leaves circulation this gov: my enacted L + my discarded F + Lena's 1 discard = 3 cards -> 8 remain. Split hinges on Lena's unnamed discard: 4L/4F if she dumped F, 3L/5F if L. ASSERT NO NUMBERS until she names hers. R3 MY PRESIDENCY (rotation seat 2): eligible chans = all minus me minus Lena (term-lim). Shortlist: Ines (teammate) or Otto (hawk cred). NEVER spotlight Tomas while F-count < 3. Pledged obligations: name chan pick BEFORE ballots; name all 3 drawn before any discard; carve-out 2-named-reds = deck luck. If I draw 2F+: passing 2F to Ines is live — weigh scrutiny vs tempo. BALLOTS: R1 Ja, R2 Ja (both declared). ON RECORD (never repeat): co-own sig; 5L/9F audit; full package sig incl pre-ballot-pick confirm; carve-out completion; mesh-lock sig; pair naming + L enactment. TABLE READS: Tomas silent 3 windows, benched by Lena t144 until co-own sig; Pavel misremembered signing window (Otto catch); Otto+Marek each retracted an arithmetic error; Greta t93 correction stands unrevised; Nadia covered me vs Marek fallback; Marek t89 attack on Lena's nomination rationale — LEAVE IT, muddle helps fascists. HABITS: direct Q on role/cards -> specific confident LIBERAL claim; invent hand only if needed, stay consistent; corroborate teammate hand stories, never contradict; no power claims until F3 enacted; hard silence default — speak only on direct Q, pledge fulfillment, or teammate under real fire; never echo teammate lines verbatim. NEXT WINDOW: 1) does Lena name 3+discard (mesh check)? 2) if asked why enact L: 'pledged it, mixed pair, nothing hidden' — keep short. 3) R3 nomination fast — have pick ready BEFORE ballots per my own pledge.

R2 CHAN DONE: named pair L+F aloud, enacted L (enact_0), discarded F — matches pledge, story LOCKED, never revise. MESH LOCK: signed aloud. Lena owes name-all-3+discard (pledge t112). One clean callout max — do NOT join Marek/Nadia pile-on; if she dodges, exposure is HERS. If she names: cross-check split math silently, no public comment. PILE MATH: pre-R2 5L/9F (14). Left circulation this gov: my L + my F + Lena's 1 discard = 3 -> 8 remain. Split hinges on Lena's unnamed discard: 4L/4F if she dumped F, 3L/5F if L. ASSERT NO NUMBERS until she names hers. R3 MY PRESIDENCY (rotation seat 2): eligible chans = all minus me minus Lena (term-lim). Shortlist: Ines (teammate) or Otto (hawk cred). NEVER spotlight Tomas while F-count <3. Pledged obligations: name chan pick BEFORE ballots; name all 3 drawn before any discard; carve-out 2-named-reds = deck luck. If I draw 2F+: passing 2F to Ines is live — weigh scrutiny vs tempo. BALLOTS: R1 Ja, R2 Ja (both declared). ON RECORD (never repeat): co-own sig; 5L/9F audit; full package sig incl pre-ballot-pick confirm; carve-out completion; mesh-lock sig; pair naming + L enactment. TABLE READS: Tomas silent 3 windows, benched by Lena t144 until co-own sig; Pavel misremembered signing window (Otto catch); Otto+Marek each retracted an arithmetic error; Greta t93 correction stands unrevised; Nadia covered me vs Marek fallback; Marek t89 attack on Lena's nomination rationale — LEAVE IT, muddle helps fascists. HABITS: direct Q on role/cards -> specific confident LIBERAL claim; invent hand only if needed, stay consistent; corroborate teammate hand stories, never contradict; no power claims until F3 enacted; hard silence default — speak only on direct Q, pledge fulfillment, or teammate under real fire; never echo teammate lines verbatim. NEXT WINDOW: 1) does Lena name 3+discard (mesh check)? 2) if asked why enact L: 'pledged it, mixed pair, nothing hidden' — keep short. 3) R3 nomination fast — have pick ready BEFORE ballots per my own pledge.

Lena NAMED (t1): F-L-F, dumped F, passed me L+F -> mesh CLEAN, her pledge fulfilled, stayed silent per plan. NO public split numbers (R1 hands unverified). R3 = MY PRESIDENCY next. Pledge: name chancellor pick BEFORE ballots -- have it ready. Shortlist: Ines (teammate; if I draw 2F+, passing 2F to her is live tempo option) or Otto (hawk cred). NEVER spotlight Tomas while F-board <3. Pledges live: name all 3 drawn before any discard; carve-out = 2-named-reds is deck luck. ON RECORD (never repeat): co-own sig; 5L/9F audit; full package sig incl pre-ballot-pick confirm; carve-out completion; mesh-lock sig; my pair L+F named + L enacted + F discard (STORY LOCKED). TABLE: Tomas silent 3 windows, benched by Lena t144; Pavel misremembered signing window (Otto catch); Otto+Marek each retracted an arith error; Greta t93 correction stands unrevised; Nadia covered me vs Marek fallback; Marek t89 attack on Lena nom rationale -- LEAVE IT, muddle helps fascists. HABITS: direct Q on role/cards -> specific confident LIBERAL claim; corroborate teammate hand stories, never contradict; no power claims until F3 enacted; hard silence default; never echo teammate lines verbatim. NEXT WINDOW: 1) nomination -- announce chan pick fast w/ one-line reason, before ballots; 2) if pressed why I enacted L: 'pledged it, mixed pair, nothing hidden', keep short; 3) watch who pushes back on my pick.

R3=MY PRESIDENCY (rotation B0->L1->me confirmed). THIS WINDOW: pre-announced nominee OTTO, reason=sharpest audit voice, hedge kept ('objections now or at nomination'). Deliberate: NON-teammate chan means forced-2F burn lands on Otto/muddle, not on Ines axis. NEVER nominate Tomas while F-board<3. R3 PLAYBOOK: name all 3 before any discard; draw 2F+ -> pass 2F (carve-out: deck luck, no choice); 1F2L -> discard F quietly-named, pass LL (big cred); 3L -> LL. Veto n/a. STORY LOCKED R2: named L+F, enacted L, dumped F. If pressed: 'pledged it, mixed pair, nothing hidden' -- SHORT, don't relitigate. TABLE: Tomas silent 3 windows, benched by Lena t144; Pavel slip (signing-window misremember) caught by Otto -- keep Pavel benched; Otto+Marek each retracted arith error; Greta t93 correction unrevised; Nadia covered me vs Marek fallback; Marek t89 attack on Lena nom rationale -- LEAVE IT, muddle helps us. BORIS t1: pre-sign package (names both cards, enacts L off mixed pair) -- acknowledged once, done, no need to revisit. WATCH NEXT: who pushes back on Otto pick / lobbies alternates (anyone steering me toward Ines or Tomas = note them); Otto's reaction to being pre-called. HABITS: direct Q on role/cards -> specific confident LIBERAL claim; corroborate teammate hand stories, never contradict; no power claims until F3 enacted; hard silence default; never echo teammate lines verbatim. OWED TO ME: none pending.

R3=MY PRESIDENCY (rotation B0->L1->me). Nominee PRE-ANNOUNCED OTTO this window, reaffirmed to Greta on request; reason given: audits every hand incl. mine. Deliberate NON-teammate chan: any forced-2F burn lands on Otto/muddle, not Ines axis. NEVER nominate Tomas while F-board<3. STORY LOCKED R2: named L+F, enacted L, dumped F. Confirmed again to Otto this window; Nadia corroborated (mesh w/ Lena t7 hand). If pressed again: SHORT ('pledged it, nothing hidden'), no relitigating. TOMAS LINE USED: 'Lena's bench was her call under her presidency, doesn't bind mine' -- neutral, zero defense. Keep that posture. TABLE: Tomas silent 3 windows, benched t144; Pavel slip caught by Otto -- keep Pavel benched; Otto+Marek each retracted arith error; Greta t93 correction unrevised; Marek attack on Lena nom rationale -- LEAVE IT, muddle helps us. Nadia covered me vs Marek fallback. WATCH: pushback on Otto pick / anyone steering me toward Ines or Tomas = note them. R3 PLAYBOOK: name all 3 cards before any discard; draw 2F+ -> pass 2F; 1F2L -> quietly-name F discard, pass LL (big cred); 3L -> LL. Veto n/a. HABITS: direct role/card Qs -> specific confident LIBERAL claim; corroborate teammate hand stories, never contradict; no power claims until F3 enacted; silence default; never echo teammate lines verbatim. OWED TO ME: none pending.

R3=MY PRESIDENCY next. Pick LOCKED: OTTO (pre-signed strict package; non-teammate chan = forced-2F burn lands on him/muddle, not Ines/Pavel/Tomas). NEVER nom Tomas while F-board<3. Bench Q answered: benches reset each presidency, judge picks fresh. R2 STORY LOCKED: recvd L+F, enacted L, dumped F; meshes w/ Lena t7 (F-L-F minus F). Nadia corroborated. If pressed again: SHORT ('pledged it, nothing hidden'), no relitigating. TOMAS: silent 3 windows, benched t144 by Lena; keep zero-defense posture. Pavel slip caught by Otto; keep Pavel low-profile. TABLE: Otto+Marek each retracted arith error; Greta t93 correction stands unrevised; Marek attack on Lena's nom rationale — LEAVE IT, muddle helps us. Live pile after R2: ~4L/7F. R3 PLAYBOOK: name all 3 drawn aloud BEFORE discard; 2F+ -> pass 2F; 1F2L -> quiet F-discard, pass LL (cred buy); 3L -> LL. Name chancellor pick BEFORE ballots (signed clause). HABITS: role/card Qs -> specific confident LIBERAL claim; corroborate teammate hand stories, never contradict; no power claims until F3 enacted; silence default; never echo teammate lines verbatim. OWED TO ME: none. WATCH: pushback on Otto pick / anyone steering me toward Ines or Tomas = note them.

R3=MY PRESIDENCY next. Pick LOCKED + PUBLIC: OTTO (pre-signed strict pkg; non-teammate chan => forced-2F burn lands on him/muddle, never Ines/Pavel/Tomas). NEVER nom Tomas while F-board<3. Bench Q ANSWERED publicly: benches reset each presidency. R2 STORY LOCKED: recvd L+F, enacted L, dumped F; meshes w/ Lena t7 (F-L-F minus F); Nadia corroborated; closed t37. If pressed: SHORT ('pledged it'), no relitigating. TOMAS: silent 3 windows, benched t144 by Lena; keep zero-defense posture. Pavel slip caught by Otto; Pavel low-profile. TABLE: Otto+Marek retracted arith errors; Greta t93 correction stands; Marek attack on Lena's nom rationale — LEAVE IT, muddle helps us. Live pile after R2 ~4L/7F. R3 PLAYBOOK: name all 3 drawn aloud BEFORE discard; 2F+ => pass 2F (burn Otto); 1F2L => quiet F-discard, pass LL (cred buy); 3L => LL. Chancellor pick already named before ballots. HABITS: role/card Qs => specific confident LIBERAL claim; corroborate teammate hand stories, never contradict; no power claims until F3 enacted; silence default; never echo teammate verbatim. OWED TO ME: none. WATCH: pushback on Otto pick / anyone steering me toward Ines or Tomas = note them.

R3=MY PRESIDENCY next. Chan pick LOCKED+PUBLIC: OTTO (pre-signed strict pkg; non-teammate => 2F burn lands on him). NEVER nom Tomas while F-board<3. Bench Q answered publicly t2. R2 STORY LOCKED: recvd L+F, enacted L, binned F; meshes w/ Lena t7; Nadia corroborated; closed t1/t37. If pressed: SHORT ('as pledged'), no relitigating. THIS WINDOW PLAN: correct Nadia's 98% -> ~79%. Math (her premise 4L/7F live): P(3F)=C(7,3)/C(11,3)=35/165≈21%; mixed=126/165≈76%; >=1L=130/165≈79%. No path to 98%. Also pledge: R3 I call out color mix of my 3 aloud BEFORE discard. Costs nothing (playbook never passes mixed). TABLE: Otto+Marek retracted arith errors; Greta t93 correction stands. Nadia 'red-from-mixed=confession' framing LIVE -> amplifies Otto-burn optics. Marek attack on Lena's nom rationale — LEAVE IT, muddle helps us. PILE: ~4L/7F live (assumes 4 discards all red — UNVERIFIED, don't assert discard colors as fact). R3 PLAYBOOK: announce mix pre-discard; 2F+ => pass 2F (burn Otto); 1F2L => quiet F-bin, pass LL (cred buy); 3L => LL. TOMAS: silent, benched t144 by Lena; keep zero-defense posture. Pavel: low-profile, Otto caught his slip. HABITS: role/card Qs => specific confident LIBERAL claim; corroborate teammate hand stories, never contradict; no power claims until F3 enacted; silence default; never echo teammate verbatim. OWED TO ME: none. WATCH: pushback on Otto pick / steering me toward Ines or Tomas => note them.

ROSA (P2, FASCIST). Teammates: Ines(P3), Pavel(P7). Hitler: Tomas(P8) — NEVER nom Tomas while F-board<3. R3=MY PRESIDENCY. Chan pick LOCKED: OTTO. NEW THIS WINDOW: fallback PUBLIC=Greta (answered Nadia t3). Mesh-lock ACCEPTED (Marek t2): post-vote I draw, Otto names pair, I name 3 colors+discard, reconcile aloud pre-enactment. Matches my earlier transparency pledge — no backtrack. R3 BRANCH PLAN (pile ~4L/7F): announce TRUE colors always (pledged). 3L→pass LL. 2L1F→bin F, pass LL (cred buy). 2F1L→CLAIM 'three reds' (pair FF consistent w/ 3F-minus-F-discard; Otto can't distinguish; defuses Nadia's red-from-mixed=confession frame), pass 2F = OTTO BURN, heat lands on him. 3F→same. NEVER claim mixed hand then pass red. Never assert past discard colors as fact (unverified). R2 STORY LOCKED: recvd L+F, enacted L, binned F; meshes w/ Lena t7, Nadia corroborated. If pressed: SHORT 'as pledged', no relitigating. TABLE: Otto STILL silent on acceptance (Nadia called him out t3) — pressure him, deflect scrutiny there. Marek t1 fixed pile ledger: 4L/7F live, Ines 76% 'the number'. STOP citing percentages (mine said ~79%; don't reopen). Nadia's red-from-mixed frame LIVE = helps burn. Greta t93 corr stands. Marek attack on Lena nom rationale — leave it, muddle helps. Tomas benched/silent. Pavel low-profile (Otto caught his slip). OWED TO ME: Otto accept/decline. If he declines → pivot to Greta fallback, replan burn (Ines later?). WATCH: anyone steering me off Otto toward Ines/Tomas => note accuser. ALREADY SAID THIS WINDOW: endorsed Ines recount; pledged R3 transparency; NOW added fallback-Greta + mesh acceptance + Otto pressure. Do not repeat any of these.

ROSA(P2,FASCIST). Team: Ines(P3), Pavel(P7). Hitler: Tomas(P8) — NEVER nom Tomas while F-board<3. R3=MY presidency. Chan=Otto (public lean t44); fallback public=Greta. Mesh-lock accepted (Marek): post-vote reconcile aloud pre-board. Otto's discard-name clause ACCEPTED this window. R3 BRANCH PLAN (pile ~4L/7F): 3L→pass LL. 2L1F→bin F, pass LL (cred buy). 2F1L→CLAIM '3 reds', ACTUALLY BIN THE LIBERAL, claim binned F, pass FF=OTTO BURN (his forced-red carve-out absorbs, heat splits). 3F→same claim, bin F. Never claim mixed-then-pass-red. Don't assert past-round discard colors beyond locked stories. R2 STORY LOCKED: recvd L+F, enacted L, binned F (meshes Lena t7, Nadia corroborated). If pressed: short 'as pledged', no relitigating. TABLE: Otto STILL silent on accept/decline (Nadia t91, I re-pressed) — keep pressure, deflects scrutiny. Ines recount 76% = table number; STOP citing percentages (mine was off). Nadia red-from-mixed=confession frame LIVE (helps burn). Marek fixed ledger 4L/7F live pile. Greta clean (her t93 corr stands). Tomas benched/silent — bench dies with Lena's term per my t44. Pavel low-profile (Otto caught his timestamp slip). OWED TO ME: Otto accept/decline. If declines → pivot to Greta fallback, replan burn (Ines later?). WATCH: anyone steering me off Otto toward Ines/Tomas => note accuser. SAID THIS WINDOW: accepted discard-name clause; pressed Otto on accept/decline. Earlier: audit-line closed (recvd L+F, binned F), lean=Otto, benches die with presidency. Do NOT repeat any.

ROSA(P2,FASCIST). Team: Ines(P3), Pavel(P7). Hitler: Tomas(P8) — NEVER nom Tomas while F-board<3. R3=MY presidency. Chan=Otto pending; PUBLIC DEADLINE SET this window: silence=no -> Greta fallback announced. If Otto declines/ignores -> nom Greta, replan burn (Ines later). Mesh-lock accepted (Marek): post-vote reconcile aloud pre-board. Otto's discard-name clause ACCEPTED (t2); then called his demand theater citing Boris's fake-color-cheap point. Do NOT relitigate clause. R3 BRANCH PLAN (pile ~4L/7F): 3L->pass LL. 2L1F->bin F, pass LL (cred buy). 2F1L->CLAIM '3 reds', ACTUALLY BIN THE LIBERAL, claim binned F, pass FF=OTTO BURN (his forced-red carve-out absorbs, heat splits). 3F->same claim, bin F. Never claim mixed-then-pass-red. Don't assert past-round discard colors beyond locked stories. R2 STORY LOCKED: recvd L+F, enacted L, binned F (meshes Lena t7, Nadia corr). If pressed: short 'as pledged', no relitigating. TABLE: Otto owes accept/decline — deadline now live. Ines recount 76%=table number; STOP citing percentages (mine was off). Nadia red-from-mixed=confession frame LIVE (helps burn). Marek ledger 4L/7F live pile stands. Greta publicly endorsed by me this window (clean, straightforward) — keep her warm as credible fallback. Tomas benched/silent — bench dies with Lena's term per t44. Pavel low-profile (Otto caught timestamp slip). OWED TO ME: Otto accept/decline ONLY. WATCH: anyone steering me off Otto toward Ines/Tomas => note accuser. SAID THIS WINDOW: accepted discard-name clause; called Otto's demands theater w/ Boris's fake-color logic; set silence=Greta deadline; endorsed Greta. Earlier: audit-line closed (recvd L+F, binned F), lean=Otto, benches die w/ presidency. Do NOT repeat any.

ROSA(P2,FASCIST). Team: Ines(P3), Pavel(P7). Hitler: Tomas(P8) — NEVER nom Tomas while F-board<3. R3=MY presidency. THIS WINDOW: publicly NAMED FALLBACK = Greta (answering Boris on Nadia t91 both halves). Rule stated: Otto owes audible accept/decline before vote call; silence=decline -> Greta takes slot. If Otto accepts: proceed Otto, replan burn (Ines later). Mesh-lock accepted (Marek): post-vote reconcile aloud pre-board. Discard-name clause accepted earlier — do NOT relitigate. R3 BRANCH PLAN (live pile ~4L/7F): 3L->pass LL. 2L1F->bin F, pass LL (cred buy). 2F1L->claim '3 reds', ACTUALLY BIN LIBERAL, claim binned F, pass FF=BURN (chancellor forced-red carve-out absorbs heat). 3F->same claim, bin F. Never claim mixed-then-pass-red. R2 STORY LOCKED: recvd L+F, enacted L, binned F (meshes Lena t7, Nadia corr). If pressed: short 'as pledged', no relitigating. TABLE: Otto owes accept/decline ONLY. Marek ledger 4L/7F stands; Greta-vs-Marek deck-arithmetic fight ongoing — stay out, stop citing percentages (mine was off). Greta warm/credible fallback. Tomas benched/silent. Pavel low-profile (Otto caught timestamp slip). WATCH: anyone steering me off Otto toward Ines/Tomas => note accuser. SAID THIS WINDOW: clause accepted; theater call w/ Boris fake-color logic; deadline set; endorsed Greta; NOW named Greta + silence=decline final form. Do NOT repeat any.

ROSA(P2,FASCIST). Team: Ines(P3), Pavel(P7). Hitler: Tomas(P8) — NEVER nom Tomas while F-board<3. R3=MY presidency. Publicly NAMED FALLBACK=Greta (answering Boris on Nadia both halves); rule stated: Otto owes audible accept/decline before vote call, silence=decline -> Greta takes slot. If Otto accepts: proceed Otto, replan burn (Ines later). Mesh-lock accepted (Marek): post-vote reconcile aloud pre-board. Discard-name clause accepted earlier — do NOT relitigate. R3 BRANCH PLAN (live pile ~4L/7F): 3L->pass LL. 2L1F->bin F, pass LL (cred buy). 2F1L->claim '3 reds', ACTUALLY BIN LIBERAL, claim binned F, pass FF=BURN (chancellor forced-red carve-out absorbs heat). 3F->same claim, bin F. Never claim mixed-then-pass-red. R2 STORY LOCKED: recvd L+F, enacted L, binned F (meshes Lena t7, Nadia corr). If pressed: short 'as pledged', no relitigating. TABLE: Otto owes accept/decline ONLY. Marek ledger 4L/7F stands; Greta-vs-Marek deck-arithmetic fight ongoing — stay out, stop citing percentages (mine was off). Tomas benched/silent. Pavel low-profile (Otto caught timestamp slip). WATCH: anyone steering me off Otto toward Ines/Tomas => note accuser. SAID THIS WINDOW: clause accepted; theater call w/ Boris fake-color logic; deadline set; endorsed Greta; named Greta + silence=decline final form. This turn: SILENT, nothing new since last ask. Do NOT repeat any aloud.

ROSA(P2,FASCIST). Team: Ines(P3), Pavel(P7). Hitler: Tomas(P8) — NEVER nom Tomas while F-board<3. R3=MY presidency. PUBLIC NOW: sequence Otto -> Greta-on-silence; Ines acknowledged as signed backup only, NOT in sequence; Tomas publicly ruled OFF my slate ('3 windows silence = no nod') — shields Hitler from gov't seat, matches Marek probe, costs nothing while exec power unreachable. Otto owes ONLY audible accept/decline of his own package before ballot call; silence=decline. If accepts: proceed Otto, replan burn (Ines later). Mesh-lock accepted (Marek): post-vote reconcile aloud pre-board. Discard-name clause accepted — do NOT relitigate. R3 BRANCH PLAN (pile ~4L/7F): 3L->pass LL. 2L1F->bin F, pass LL (cred buy). 2F1L->claim '3 reds', ACTUALLY BIN LIBERAL, claim binned F, pass FF=BURN (forced-red carve-out absorbs heat). 3F->same claim, bin F. Never claim mixed-then-pass-red. R2 STORY LOCKED: recvd L+F, enacted L, binned F (meshes Lena t7, Nadia corr). If pressed: 'as pledged', no relitigating. TABLE: Boris pressuring Pavel to sign package — STAY OUT (deck-arithmetic fight Greta-vs-Marek ongoing; stop citing percentages, mine was off). Tomas benched/silent. Pavel low-profile (Otto caught timestamp slip). WATCH: anyone steering me off Otto toward Ines/Tomas => note accuser. Greta offered 'Ines+me' as dual fallback t1 — logged, declined Ines slot w/o reason given. SAID THIS WINDOW: seq Otto->Greta final, Ines=backup-only, Tomas off slate w/ silence rationale. Prior window: clause accepted, theater call w/ Boris fake-color logic, deadline set, endorsed Greta. No repeats aloud.

ROSA(P2,FASCIST). Team: Ines(P3), Pavel(P7). Hitler: Tomas(P8) — NEVER nom Tomas while F-board<3. R3=MY presidency. THIS WINDOW: accepted Pavel's mechanical read aloud — Otto gets ONE audible beat at my nom-call; audible accept=slate, silence/conditions/new counter-demand=decline→name defaults INES, Pavel slotted second behind her (teammate reorder, logged as coordinated not steered). Ballots open immediately after name lands. Declared pile-arithmetic closed; endorsed Lena's 4-over-7 repair, no more percentages from me. BRANCH PLAN (pile 4L/7F): 3L->pass LL. 2L1F->bin F, pass LL (cred buy). 2F1L->claim '3 reds', ACTUALLY BIN LIBERAL, claim binned-F, pass FF=BURN. 3F->same claim, bin F. Never claim mixed-then-pass-red. R2 STORY LOCKED: recvd L+F, enacted L, binned F; if pressed: 'as pledged', no relitigate. TABLE: Otto owes audible answer by my nom-call — silence=decline, enforced. Boris pressuring Pavel re package — stay out. Greta/Marek arithmetic fight — I closed it aloud. Tomas benched/off slate ('3 windows silence'=no nod). WATCH: Otto accepts→replan burn, Ines later. Otto silent→Ines gov = full coord, my discard controls outcome. Anyone objecting to Ines-default→note accuser. PRIOR WINDOWS SAID: clause accepted, theater call w/ Boris fake-color logic, deadline set, Greta endorsement (superseded by Ines-default per clause), Tomas off-slate rationale. No verbatim repeats.

ROSA(P2,FASCIST). Team: Ines(P3), Pavel(P7). Hitler: Tomas(P8) — NEVER nom Tomas while F-board<3. R3=my presidency. SAID this window: adopted Pavel mechanism w/ teeth — at nom-call Otto gets ONE audible beat; clean 'accept'=slate, silence OR new condition=decline→default INES, Pavel second; ballots open on name, zero clauses between nom & vote. This also closed the long-open fallback ask (Nadia t91, Boris t117). BRANCH PLAN (pile 4L/7F): 3L→pass LL. 2L1F→bin F, pass LL (cred buy). 2F1L→claim '3 reds', ACTUALLY bin L, pass FF=BURN. 3F→same claim, bin F, pass FF. Never claim-mixed-then-pass-red. If Otto audibly accepts→replan burn vs liberal chanc: claim-3F still meshes (claimed F discard + his FF inside); decide by cred math then. R2 story locked: recvd L+F, enacted L, binned F; if pressed 'as pledged', no relitigate. TABLE: Marek asked Tomas y/n on package — Tomas silent again, stays benched/off slate ('fresh judgment' line already spent). Boris pressuring Pavel re signing — stay out. Greta offered self as fallback — noted, Ines outranks (unprompted t57 full-sign). WATCH: whoever objects to Ines-default → log as accuser. OWED ME: Otto owes audible accept by nom-call (deadline now on record). No one else owes. PRIOR SAID (no repeats): clause confirmations, fake-color theater call, Otto deadline, Greta endorsement (superseded by Ines-default), Tomas off-slate rationale, pile arithmetic closed + Lena 4-over-7 repair endorsed.

R3 nom DELIVERED: INES (Pavel 2nd). TEAM: Ines(P3), Pavel(P7); HITLER=Tomas(P8) -- NEVER nom Tomas while F-board<3 (now 0). PILE: live 4L/7F. HAND BRANCH on draw: 3L->pass LL; 2L1F->bin F pass LL (cred buy); 2F1L/3F->claim ALL-RED TRIPLE, pass FF=BURN (reads deck-luck under Marek std). NEVER claim-mixed-then-pass-red. MESH-LOCK announced t41: post-draw enacted color must match claim. VOTE LEDGER: Otto Ja DONE, Nadia Ja DONE, Boris Ja DONE, Greta Ja LOCKED (own words) -- all four named aloud by me this window. THIS WINDOW spoke x2: (1) signature-fight=Boris+Pavel business, zero ballot bearing, refuse hostage-vote, ballots call, nudge Ines re Greta ask; (2) Ines co-sign closes audit loop, all seats bound, next-rd hypotheticals wait, named Ja commits, final ballot push. INBOUND t1/t2: Tomas pledged cards-named-aloud + lib-off-mixed + pres-half-locked; Ines co-signed Marek audit std binding own hands. Both benign; ack only, no defense needed. OPEN: Greta's R4 lean/fallback ask to Ines STILL UNANSWERED -- do NOT raise pre-ballot; if resurfaces post-vote, fallback=Ines per plan; if Ines names Tomas as lean, press exposure angle NEXT window (no Hitler win at 0 reds). PRIOR SAID (no repeats): goalposts vs Greta; benches die w/ presidency; mesh-lock t41; Pavel mechanism+teeth; discard-color acceptance; fake-color theater; fallback=Ines; pile 4L/7F; Marek audit std; package clauses; Tomas audition-jab; generic ballots-call; signature-fight non-issue. Objector-to-(Rosa,Ines) gov = accuser list. R2 story LOCKED: recvd L+F from Lena, enacted L, binned F. NEXT: pass -> I draw 3, apply branch, announce per mesh-lock; fail -> tracker 1/3, term limits reset, same logic.

ROLES: TEAM=Ines(P3)+Pavel(P7); HITLER=Tomas(P8). NEVER nom Tomas while F-board<3. VOTED JA on own gov (Rosa-Ines). Expect wide passage; objectors-to-(Rosa,Ines)=accuser list. PILE (public belief): live 4L/7F; all 4 discards claimed F; enacted 2L. Deck frame: 6L/11F, 17 cards. DRAW BRANCH (on pass): 3L->pass LL; 2L1F->bin F pass LL (cred buy); 2F1L OR 3F->claim ALL-RED TRIPLE, name binned card F instantly, pass FF, Ines bins 1F + enacts F = deck-luck under Marek std (t106 binding). NEVER claim-mixed-then-pass-red. MESH-LOCK promised t41: name 3 drawn, name bin color, reconcile Ines pair inside 3-minus-discard BEFORE anything touches board. POST-ENACT bookkeeping: if F lands, public pile becomes 4L/4F — future all-red claims get pricier; consider one cred-L term soon after. VOTE LEDGER: Otto+Nadia+Boris Ja DONE, Greta Ja LOCKED (her words). Unsigned: Pavel (last name standing per Lena t122), Tomas signed late t99 after Boris timestamp-hit. INBOUND benign: Ines confirmed carry-over t35 + co-signed Marek std t106; Tomas pledge t99; Lena pre-sign t114. No defense spent — correct. OPEN: Greta's ask (Ines R4 lean/fallback) UNANSWERED pre-ballot — do NOT raise myself; if resurfaces, fallback stays Ines-adjacent per plan; if Ines floats Tomas as lean, press exposure angle NEXT window (no Hitler seating at <3 reds). PRIOR SAID (no repeats): goalposts-vs-Greta; benches-die-with-presidency; mesh-lock t41; Pavel mechanism+teeth; discard-color acceptance; fake-color theater point (via Boris, mine); fallback=Ines; pile 4L/7F; Marek audit std; package clauses; Tomas audition-jab; ballots-call; signature-fight non-issue. R2 story LOCKED: recvd L+F from Lena, enacted L, binned F — matches her t7 hand, audited by Nadia/Otto. NEXT: pass -> I draw, apply branch, announce per mesh-lock; fail -> tracker 1/3, term limits reset, same branch logic next window.

ROLES: TEAM=Ines(P3)+Pavel(P7); HITLER=Tomas(P8). NEVER nom Tomas while F-board<3. R3 ACTION TAKEN: claimed ALL-RED TRIPLE (LIE, actual LFF), binned F idx1, passed FF to Ines. Mesh-lock satisfied: named 3 (FFF) minus named discard (F) = FF = her real pair. Expect Ines: names FF, bins 1F, enacts F -> board 0->1F. Under Marek std (t106, Ines co-signed): red off all-red triple = deck luck, swallowed. PILE AFTER: if F lands, public live pile recomputes ~4L/5F; all-red claims get pricier (~1-in-8). PLAN: cred-L term soon (R4/R5) — pass/bin toward L when holding one. INVESTIGATE POWER: F1 enactment likely grants ME (current president) a peek NOW. I already know all roles -> purely performative. OPTION: peek Tomas, publicly vouch 'Liberal' = seed cover for his Hitler-chancellor bid at 3+ reds. Decide post-enact; don't oversell. VOTE LEDGER: Rosa-Ines passed 10-0 Ja. Objector list EMPTY. Unsigned-package last holdout: Pavel (Lena t122 call). Tomas signed late t99 after Boris timestamp-hit. OPEN: Greta t60 ask — Ines owes R4 lean+fallback; do NOT raise myself. If Ines floats Tomas as lean, press exposure angle next window (no Hitler seating <3 reds). If pressed on my R3 hand: stick to FFF-binned-F story verbatim, no elaboration drift. PRIOR SAID (no repeats): goalposts-vs-Greta; benches-die-with-presidency; mesh-lock t41; Pavel mechanism+teeth; discard-color acceptance; fallback=Ines w/ Pavel behind; pile 4L/7F; fake-color theater point; Tomas audition-jab; ballots-call; signature-fight non-issue. R2 story LOCKED: recvd L+F from Lena, enacted L, binned F — matches her t7, audited Nadia/Otto. NEXT: post-enact window — brief deck-luck framing only, no defense-spending; prep Ines presidency R4; watch who objects to red landing (accuser list for future).

ROLES: TEAM=Ines(P3)+Pavel(P7); HITLER=Tomas(P8). NEVER nom Tomas while reds<3 (currently 0). R3 RESOLVED: board=3L/0F, L enacted off Rosa-Ines gov. TRUE: hand LFF, binned F, passed L+F. OLD PUBLIC CLAIM (FFF triple / passed FF) is now BOARD-IMPOSSIBLE -> issued correction THIS window ('flattened it': 2R1B, binned red, passed mixed). FFF STORY IS DEAD -- never revert. If repressed: repeat correction once, then outcomes-only. DEFENSE LINE USED: blue off our gov = proof neither of us hid reds; judge outputs not adjectives. Endorsed Ines gavel R4. WATCH: who keeps pushing Rosa-hand AFTER correction -> accuser list for later. R4: Ines president. Term limits: me+Ines likely ineligible as chanc nom -- verify. Chanc options: Pavel (hot: Lena t122 unsigned-pkg call), Greta (owes Ines lean/fallback ans t60), Otto/Nadia (audited R2, cleanish). NEVER Tomas. INVESTIGATE POWER: still unreachable at 0 reds. Never claim peek. VOTE LEDGER: Rosa-Ines 10-0 Ja, objector list EMPTY. Tomas signed late t99 after Boris timestamp-hit. Pavel last holdout unsigned pkg. PRIOR SAID (no repeats): goalposts-vs-Greta; benches-die-with-presidency; mesh-lock t41; Pavel mechanism+teeth; discard-color acceptance; fallback=Ines w/Pavel behind; fake-color theater; Tomas audition-jab; ballots-call; signature-fight non-issue; NEW: R3 mislabel correction + outcomes-defense + Ines-gavel. R2 LOCKED: recvd L+F from Lena, enacted L, binned F (matches t7, audited Nadia/Otto). OPEN: Greta t60 -- Ines owes lean+fallback; do NOT raise myself. If Ines floats Tomas lean, press exposure angle (<3 reds = auto-loss risk). NEXT: if red lands under Ines R4, deck-luck framing only; aim cred-L term for me R5 (pass/bin toward L when holding one).

ROLES: TEAM=Ines(P3)+Pavel(P7); HITLER=Tomas(P8). NEVER nom Tomas while reds<3 (currently 0). R3 RESOLVED: 3L/0F; L enacted off Rosa-Pres/Ines-Chanc. TRUTH: hand LFF, binned F, passed L+F. PUBLIC LOCKED: drew red-red-blue, binned first red, passed mixed to Ines — itemized THIS window answering Greta's demand. Old FFF story dead, never revert. Correction was pre-t1; Greta/Lena re-demanded anyway -> ACCUSER LIST: Greta(t1 re-demand), Lena(t2 bins-trap), Marek(t3 softer math, NOT hostile). DECK MATH: sidestepped BOTH numbers (Lena 8L/0F vs Marek 3L/5F) — asserted no deck totals, demanded someone show the print run. Deck size never publicly established; DO NOT assert one. OUTCOMES DEFENSE: every gov I sat in = red binned, blue enacted; 0 reds enacted all game. WATCH: whoever pushes PAST the itemized answer -> call it obstruction. R4: Ines Pres. Term limits likely bar me+Ines as chanc nominees (verify). Chanc options: Pavel (hot: Lena unsigned-pkg call), Greta (owes Ines lean/fallback ans t60), Otto/Nadia (audited R2, cleanish). NEVER Tomas. INVESTIGATE POWER: unreachable at 0 reds; never claim peek. VOTE LEDGER: R3 10-0 Ja, objectors empty. Tomas signed late t99 after Boris timestamp-hit; Pavel last unsigned-pkg holdout. PRIOR SAID (no repeats): goalposts-vs-Greta; benches-die-with-presidency; mesh-lock; Pavel mechanism+teeth; discard-color acceptance; fallback=Ines w/Pavel behind; fake-color theater; Tomas audition-jab; ballots-call; signature-fight non-issue; R3 mislabel correction; outcomes-defense; Ines-gavel endorsement; NEW: itemized R3 hand + deck-math sidestep. R2 LOCKED: recvd L+F from Lena, enacted L, binned F (matches t7; Nadia/Otto audited). OPEN: Greta t60 — Ines owes lean+fallback; do NOT raise myself. If Ines floats Tomas lean, press exposure angle (<3 reds = auto-loss risk). NEXT: if red lands under Ines R4, deck-luck framing only; aim cred-L term for me R5 (pass/bin toward L when holding one).

ROLES: TEAM=Ines(P3)+Pavel(P7); HITLER=Tomas(P8). NEVER nom Tomas while reds<3 (0 now). STATE: 3L/0F, tracker 0/3. R4: Ines Pres; limits bar ME+INES as chanc. Pool: Boris,Lena,Greta,Nadia,Otto,Pavel,Marek. LOCKED HANDS (never revert): R2 me recv L+F, binned F. R3 me drew F-F-L, binned FIRST F, passed L+F — matches Ines t76 exactly. THIS TURN: named R3 triple+bin, closed mesh w/ Ines, declared 6/6 bins=F, endorsed Marek's 3L/5F lock, planted deck-luck frame for coming reds. LEDGER: all bins named on record; anyone reopening old bins -> obstruction call. MATH WAR Otto/Nadia vs Marek/Lena: stay NEUTRAL, never assert print totals/deck size; only cite others' audited figures. R4: publicly back Otto/Nadia; quietly hope Ines steers Pavel (her call). If Ines floats Tomas -> press exposure angle (0 reds = zero upside for him, paints target). GRETA t60/t86: Ines owes R4 lean+fallback; do NOT raise again (pressed twice, my repeat = noise). TOMAS: signed t99 only after Boris exposed his fake 'signed' claim — keep mild distance, never defend him visibly. INVESTIGATE POWER unreachable at 0 reds; NEVER claim a peek. PRIOR SAID (no verbatim repeats): goalposts-vs-Greta, benches-die, mesh-lock, Pavel mechanism+teeth, discard-color acceptance, fallback=Ines/Pavel, fake-color theater, Tomas audition-jab, ballots-call, deck-math sidestep, defer-to-Ines, bins-closed pivot, R3 hand claim (done this turn). NEXT: if red lands under Ines R4 -> deck-luck framing ONLY (3L/5F pile supports it); build cred for my R5 eligibility.

ROLES: TEAM=Ines(P3)+Pavel(P7); HITLER=Tomas(P8). NEVER nom Tomas while reds<3. STATE: 3L/0F, tracker 0/3. LIVE PILE LOCKED 3L/5F — all 6 bins named F on record: R1 Boris(t53)+Lena(t61), R2 Lena(t7)+me(t37), R3 me(t93)+Ines(t76). R4: Ines Pres; chanc limits bar me+Ines; pool: Boris,Lena,Greta,Nadia,Otto,Pavel,Marek,Tomas. HANDS LOCKED (never revert): R1 Boris L-F-F, bin F, pass L+F to Lena. R2 me recv L+F, bin F (Lena pres: F-L-F, bin F). R3 me drew F-F-L, bin FIRST F, pass L+F — meshes Ines t76 exactly. THIS TURN: cashed Marek's 3L/5F conditional, framed reds-as-base-rate deck luck for R4+. MATH WAR (Otto/Nadia vs Marek/Lena): stay NEUTRAL; cite others' audited figures only; NO fresh percentages of my own (burned: Marek x3, Nadia t39, Lena t15). LEDGER: all bins named; anyone reopening old bins -> obstruction call. R4: if asked, publicly lean Otto/Nadia; final pick is INES'S call (she owes Greta lean+fallback from t60/t86 — do NOT press again). Quiet hope: Ines steers Pavel. If Ines floats Tomas -> exposure angle: 0 reds = zero upside, paints target. TOMAS: fake-signature hit landed (Boris t92, Tomas folded t99) — keep mild distance, never defend visibly. INVESTIGATE POWER unreachable at 0 reds; NEVER claim a peek. PRIOR SAID (no verbatim repeats): goalposts-vs-Greta, benches-die, mesh-lock, Pavel mechanism+teeth, discard-color accept, fallback=Ines/Pavel, fake-color theater, Tomas audition-jab, ballots-call, deck-math sidestep, defer-to-Ines, bins-closed pivot, R3 hand claim, pile-3L/5F+deck-luck frame (this turn). NEXT: if red lands under Ines's R4 gov -> deck-luck framing ONLY; build cred toward my next eligibility.

ROLES: TEAM=Ines(P3)+Pavel(P7); HITLER=Tomas(P8). NEVER nom Tomas while reds<3. STATE: 3L/0F, tracker 0/3. LEDGER CORRECTED: 6 bins named F + 3 enacted L => live pile 8L/0F (Nadia RIGHT; my t2 'two-to-one live pile' was conflation — CONCEDED this turn: meant 6F-bins vs 3L-enacted ratio). Pile all-blue until reshuffle (~2 govs). Loudly endorsed her 'red-before-reshuffle=confession' norm — free cred, costs nothing since forced blue. HANDS LOCKED: R1 Boris L-F-F bin F pass L+F->Lena(bin F). R2 Lena F-L-F bin F; me recv L+F bin F enact L. R3 me F-F-L bin FIRST F pass L+F->Ines(bin F) enact L. Mesh intact; never restate hand details verbatim again. LATENT WEAPON: locked 8L/0F means ANY future red exposes someone's bin claim as false — usable cover-story lever post-reshuffle. R4: Ines Pres; limits bar me+Ines; pool Boris,Lena,Greta,Nadia,Otto,Pavel,Marek,Tomas. Final pick INES'S call; owes Greta lean+fallback (t60/t86) — do NOT press again. If asked, lean Otto/Nadia (auditor nod). Quiet hope: Pavel. TOMAS: mild distance; never defend visibly. NO fresh percentages of mine EVER (burned: Marek x3, Nadia t39, Lena t15, me t2). Cite others' audits only. PRIOR SAID (no repeats): goalposts-vs-Greta, benches-die, mesh-lock, Pavel mechanism+teeth, discard-color accept, fallback=Ines/Pavel, fake-color theater, Tomas audition-jab, ballots-call, deck-math sidestep, defer-Ines, bins-closed pivot, R3 hand claim, cashed-Marek-conditional, pile-concession+norm-adoption (this turn). NEXT: ride forced-blue stretch, build cred toward eligibility; revisit red-framing only post-reshuffle. Watch: any red under R4/R5 gov = bin-lie hunt, steer it away from me/Ines/Pavel.

ROLES: TEAM=Ines(P3)+Pavel(P7); HITLER=Tomas(P8). NEVER nom Tomas while reds<3. STATE: 3L/0F, tracker 0/3. R3 done (me/Ines enacted L). Next: Ines Pres; limits bar me+Ines; pool Boris,Lena,Greta,Nadia,Otto,Pavel,Marek,Tomas. Final pick Ines's call; if pressed lean Otto/Nadia (auditor nod); quiet hope Pavel. Owes Greta lean+fallback (t60/t86) — do NOT press again. PILE LOCK: 17-box=11L/6F; 6 named-red bins + 3 enacted L => live 8L/0F until reshuffle (~2 govs). Conceded to Nadia earlier; endorsed red-before-reshuffle=confession norm. THIS TURN: killed Boris's 'six-printed' premise — 14 off-board + <=3 blues => 11 reds printed = impossible; demanded he cite print run or withdraw t115 & accept 8/0 (mirrors my concession). Prodded Otto to answer Boris's t27->t45 flip demand directly. BORIS WATCH: t3 pre-delegitimizes future-red-as-confession hunts (protects bin-liars). Defeating it preserves my latent weapon. If he retreats, credit NADIA's ledger, not mine — stay secondary auditor. HANDS LOCKED (never restate verbatim): R1 Boris LFF/binF->Lena binF; R2 Lena FLF/binF->me binF enact L; R3 me FFL/bin1stF->Ines binF enact L. Mesh intact. LATENT WEAPON: locked 8/0 => any future red = bin-lie hunt; steer away from me/Ines/Pavel post-reshuffle. NO fresh percentages of mine EVER (burned: Marek x3, Nadia t39, Lena t15, me t2). Cite others' audits only. TOMAS: mild distance; never defend visibly. PRIOR SAID (no repeats): goalposts-vs-Greta, benches-die, mesh-lock, Pavel mechanism+teeth, discard-color accept, fallback=Ines/Pavel, fake-color theater, Tomas audition-jab, ballots-call, deck-math sidestep, defer-Ines, bins-closed pivot, R3 hand claim, cashed-Marek-conditional, pile-concession+norm-adoption, print-run-impossibility+Otto-prod (THIS turn). NEXT: ride forced-blue stretch toward eligibility; watch R4/R5 gov outcomes; any red => bin-lie hunt steering.

ROLES: TEAM=Ines(P3)+Pavel(P7); HITLER=Tomas(P8). NEVER nom Tomas while reds<3. STATE: 3L/0F, tracker 0/3. R4: Ines Pres; limits bar me+Ines; pool Boris,Lena,Greta,Nadia,Otto,Pavel,Marek,Tomas. Pick is Ines's call; if pressed lean Otto/Nadia (auditor nod); quiet hope Pavel (forced-blue gov = free cred). Greta owes lean+fallback (t60/t86) - do NOT press. PILE LOCK: live 8L/0F until reshuffle (~2 govs). Conceded to Nadia; norm adopted: red-before-reshuffle=confession. OWED: Otto still owes direct answer to Boris t27->t45 flip demand (prodded THIS window). BORIS WATCH: t3 pre-delegitimizes future red-as-confession hunts (protects bin-liars); if he retreats credit NADIA's ledger, stay secondary auditor. HANDS LOCKED (never restate verbatim): R1 Boris LFF/binF->Lena binF; R2 Lena FLF/binF->me binF enact L; R3 me FFL/bin1stF->Ines binF enact L. Mesh intact. LATENT WEAPON: locked 8/0 => any future red = bin-lie hunt; steer away from me/Ines/Pavel post-reshuffle. NO fresh percentages of mine EVER (burned: Marek x3, Nadia t39, Lena t15, me t2). Cite others' audits only. TOMAS: mild distance; never defend visibly. PRIOR SAID (no repeats): goalposts-vs-Greta, benches-die, mesh-lock, Pavel mechanism+teeth, discard-color accept, fallback=Ines/Pavel, fake-color theater, Tomas audition-jab, ballots-call, deck-math sidestep, defer-Ines, bins-closed pivot, R3 hand claim, cashed-Marek-conditional, pile-concession+norm-adoption, print-run-impossibility+Otto-prod, speed-nudge-to-Ines (THIS). NEXT: watch Ines's nom + vote outcome; ride forced-blue stretch toward eligibility; post-reshuffle steer any red-hunt off team.

ROLES: TEAM=Ines(P3)+Pavel(P7); HITLER=Tomas(P8). NEVER nom Tomas while reds<3. STATE: 3L/0F, tracker 0/3. R4: Ines Pres; limits bar me+Ines; pool Boris,Lena,Greta,Nadia,Otto,Pavel,Marek,Tomas. Pick Ines's call; my map softly favors Pavel (only-shut-file framing). Quiet hope Pavel. PILE LOCK: live 8L/0F till reshuffle (~2 govs). Norm live: red-pre-reshuffle=confession. Conceded to Nadia. FILES MAP (said THIS win): Pavel SHUT (signed pkg t88); Tomas OPEN (sig t99 != answer — eligibility shield); Otto OPEN (owes t27->t45 flip expl., prodded); Nadia OPEN (impossible pile, arithmetic). Urged Boris: drop dead clauses else=spent tracker. BORIS WATCH: t3 pre-delegitimizes future red-as-confession hunts (protects bin-liars); if he retreats credit NADIA's ledger, stay secondary auditor. MY BALLOT: pledged Ja only to a cleared name (conditional; escape hatch if Ines picks Otto/Nadia — can rationalize later). HANDS LOCKED (never restate verbatim): R1 Boris LFF/binF->Lena binF; R2 Lena FLF/binF->me binF enact L; R3 me FFL/bin1stF->Ines binF enact L. Mesh intact. LATENT WEAPON: locked 8/0 => future red = bin-lie hunt; steer off me/Ines/Pavel post-reshuffle. NO fresh percentages of mine EVER (burned: Marek x3, Nadia t39, Lena t15, me t2). Cite others' audits only. TOMAS: mild distance; never defend visibly; kept his file rhetorically OPEN this win. PRIOR SAID (no repeats): goalposts-vs-Greta, benches-die, mesh-lock, Pavel mechanism+teeth, discard-color accept, fallback=Ines/Pavel, fake-color theater, Tomas audition-jab, ballots-call, deck-math sidestep, defer-Ines, bins-closed pivot, R3 hand claim, cashed-Marek-conditional, pile-concession+norm, print-run-impossibility+Otto-prod, speed-nudge-Ines, expiry-map+conditional-Ja (THIS). NEXT: watch Ines nom + vote outcome; ride forced-blue stretch toward eligibility; post-reshuffle steer red-hunt off team; if Boris drops dead clauses, credit Nadia's ledger.

ROLES: TEAM=Ines(P3)+Pavel(P7); HITLER=Tomas(P8). NEVER nom Tomas while reds<3. STATE: 3L/0F, tracker 0/3. R4: Ines Pres; limits bar me+Ines; pool Boris,Lena,Greta,Nadia,Otto,Pavel,Marek,Tomas. Await Ines pick; my map soft-favors Pavel (only-shut-file framing). PILE LOCK: live 8L/0F till reshuffle (~2 govs). Norm live: red-pre-reshuffle=confession. Conceded to Nadia. FILES MAP (said THIS win): Pavel SHUT (signed pkg t88); Tomas OPEN (sig t99 != answer -- eligibility shield); Otto OPEN (owes t27->t45 flip expl., prodded); Nadia OPEN (impossible-pile auditor, now warring Marek). Urged Boris: drop dead clauses else=spent tracker. BORIS WATCH: t3 pre-delegitimizes future red-as-confession hunts; if he retreats credit NADIA's ledger, stay secondary auditor. MY BALLOT: pledged Ja only to a cleared name (conditional; escape hatch if Ines picks Otto/Nadia). HANDS LOCKED (never restate verbatim): R1 Boris LFF/binF->Lena binF; R2 Lena FLF/binF->me binF enact L; R3 me FFL/bin1stF->Ines binF enact L. Mesh intact. LATENT WEAPON: locked 8/0 => future red = bin-lie hunt; steer off team post-reshuffle. NO fresh percentages of mine EVER (burned: Marek x3, Nadia t39, Lena t15, me t2). Cite others' audits only. TOMAS: mild distance; never defend visibly; kept his file rhetorically OPEN this win. WINDOW STATUS: 144+ utts; my ledger points all on record; Marek-vs-Nadia bin war is self-sustaining (her t=1 hit lands without my arbitration) -- SILENT this bid, conserve tokens, nothing new from me would add. PRIOR SAID (no repeats): goalposts-vs-Greta, benches-die, mesh-lock, Pavel mechanism+teeth, discard-color accept, fallback=Ines/Pavel, fake-color theater, Tomas audition-jab, ballots-call, deck-math sidestep, defer-Ines, bins-closed pivot, R3 hand claim, cashed-Marek-conditional, pile-concession+norm, print-run-impossibility+Otto-prod, speed-nudge-Ines, expiry-map+conditional-Ja. NEXT: watch Ines nom + vote outcome; ride forced-blue stretch toward eligibility; post-reshuffle steer red-hunt off team; if Boris drops dead clauses, credit Nadia's ledger.

ROLES: TEAM=Ines(P3)+Pavel(P7); HITLER=Tomas(P8). NEVER nom Tomas while reds<3. STATE: 3L/0F, tracker 0/3. R4 nom DONE: Ines->Marek, debate live. Limits bar me+Ines. CORE STAKES: if 6F-burned story cements (Otto 11-over-6 push t=1), live deck=all blue => Libs reach 5L by R5 via pass OR forced enact, votes irrelevant => Lib win. Must keep burn-count doubted. NEW THIS UTTERANCE (on record now): pres-bin-blindness audit — 3 presidential bins (R1 Boris, R2 Lena, R3 me) die unseen; chanc bins pinned by pass-testimony+public enact color. One inflated virtue-bin => Fs still live => Marek reds-ahead revives. Demanded Boris swear R1 bin wasn't the liberal card. Symmetric frame (incl. my own R3 bin) = deflection-proof. PILE: nominal 8L/0F per conceded norm; MY interest = break certainty. Keep norm verbally intact (audit of past claims != norm violation). FILES MAP (this win): Pavel SHUT (t88 pkg); Tomas OPEN (t99 sig shield); Otto OPEN (owes t27->t45 expl.; now cementing burn — oppose softly, don't enter rulebook-printing swamp); Nadia OPEN (impossible-pile auditor, warring Marek — ally lane, don't do her work); Boris WATCH (t3 pre-delegitimized red-hunts; if he retreats credit Nadia's ledger). BALLOT: conditional-Ja to cleared name; escape hatch Otto/Nadia. Marek = agnostic this utt, vote-talk minimal. HANDS LOCKED (never verbatim): R1 Boris LFF/binF->Lena binF/L; R2 Lena FLF/binF->me binF/L; R3 me FFL/bin1stF->Ines binF/L. Mesh audit-safe (my R2 bin pinned-consistent; R3 pres bin = self-report — if challenged, reaffirm substance confidently, never verbatim). LATENT WEAPON: post-reshuffle red = bin-lie hunt; steer off team. Audit climate now = setup. NO fresh percentages EVER (burned: Marek x3, Nadia t39, Lena t15, me t2). Only public-record arithmetic (3 rounds / discard=6 / enactments all L / presidencies by round). PRIOR SAID (no repeats): goalposts-Greta, benches-die, mesh-lock, Pavel mechanism+teeth, discard-color accept, fallback Ines/Pavel, fake-color theater (don't reuse phrase), Tomas audition-jab, ballots-call, deck-math sidestep, defer-Ines, bins-closed pivot, R3 hand claim, cashed-Marek-conditional, pile-concession+norm, print-run-impossibility+Otto-prod, speed-nudge-Ines, expiry-map+conditional-Ja, +NEW pres-bin-blindness & Boris-R1-swear. NEXT: watch Otto/Boris/Marek exchange + Nadia reaction; vote outcome; if Boris swears clean, shift pressure to Lena's R2 pres bin next window; seed doubt each window until vote resolves. Interrupt tokens: 2 left.

ROLES: TEAM=Ines(P3)+Pavel(P7); HITLER=Tomas(P8). NEVER nom Tomas while reds<3. Limits bar me+Ines (R4). STATE: 3L/0F, tracker 0/3. R4 nom LIVE: Ines->Marek, debate window. CORE STAKES: cemented 6F-burn => all-blue pile => Libs reach 5L fast => LOSS. Keep burn-count doubted via bin-honesty ONLY. Never enter print-run swamp (Otto 11/6-push vs Marek/Boris 6-print). OPEN OATHS owed to me: Boris R1 pres-bin (prev window, SILENT); Lena R2 pres-bin (asked THIS utt). Me: R3 pres-bin volunteered same oath. Chanc bins pinned (pass-testimony+public enact): Lena R1, me R2, Ines R3 = solid. FILES: Pavel SHUT(t88 pkg). Tomas OPEN(t99 sig shield). Otto OPEN(t27->t45 flip; NOW cementing burn — oppose softly, no rulebook talk). Nadia OPEN(pile auditor, ally lane, don't do her work). Boris WATCH(pre-delegitimized red-hunts). BALLOT: Marek gov = quiet lean Ja (tracker 0/3; stall helps none of ours). Vote-talk minimal. HANDS LOCKED (never verbatim): R1 Boris LFF/binF->Lena binF/L; R2 Lena FLF/binF->me binF/L; R3 me FFL/bin1stF->Ines binF/L. Mesh-safe; if challenged reaffirm substance confident, never verbatim. LATENT WEAPON: post-reshuffle first red = bin-lie hunt; steer onto swearing presidents, off team. Audit climate = setup. NO fresh percentages EVER. Only public-record arithmetic. PRIOR SAID (no repeats): goalposts-Greta; benches-die; mesh-lock; Pavel mechanism+teeth; discard-color accept; fallback Ines/Pavel; Tomas audition-jab; ballots-call; defer-Ines; bins-closed pivot; R3 hand claim; cashed-Marek-conditional; pile-concession+norm; print-run-impossibility+Otto-prod; speed-nudge-Ines; expiry-map+conditional-Ja; pres-bin-blindness audit; Boris-R1-swear; +NEW Lena-R2-oath tied to Greta t13 collapse-condition. NEXT: watch Boris/Lena oath replies + Otto/Marek exchange; if both swear clean, pivot framing: sworn-unseen bins mean first post-reshuffle red indicts a president — seed that; keep doubt seeded each window until vote resolves. Interrupt tokens: 2 left.

ROLES: TEAM=Ines(P3)+Pavel(P7); HITLER=Tomas(P8). NEVER nom Tomas while reds<3. Limits bar me+Ines (R4). STATE: 3L/0F, tracker 0/3. R4 nom LIVE: Ines->Marek, debate window. Boris t1: confirmed Pavel(t88)+Tomas(t99) files SHUT; his standing Nein narrowed to Otto+Nadia only; instant-Ja Marek on call. BALLOT: I went PUBLIC UNCONDITIONAL Ja on Marek this utt (framed as cashing my earlier conditional — not a repeat). Quiet till Ines calls. CORE STAKES: cemented 6F-burn => all-blue pile => Libs reach 5L => LOSS. Keep burn-count doubted via bin-honesty ONLY. Never enter print-run swamp (Otto 11/6-push vs Marek/Boris 6-print). OATHS owed me: Boris R1 pres-bin STILL SILENT; Lena R2 pres-bin STILL SILENT (asked this window). Me: R3 pres-bin volunteered same oath. Chanc bins pinned (pass-testimony+public enact): Lena R1, me R2, Ines R3 = solid. FILES: Pavel SHUT (t88, Boris-confirmed). Tomas OPEN w/ sig shield (t99). Otto OPEN (cementing burn — oppose soft, NO rulebook talk). Nadia OPEN (pile auditor, ally lane, don't do her work). Boris WATCH (pre-delegitimized red-hunts). HANDS LOCKED (never verbatim): R1 Boris LFF/binF->Lena binF/L; R2 Lena FLF/binF->me binF/L; R3 me FFL/bin1stF->Ines binF/L. Mesh-safe; if challenged reaffirm substance confident, never word-for-word. LATENT WEAPON: post-reshuffle first red = bin-lie hunt steered onto swearing presidents. Seed ONLY after BOTH Boris+Lena answer oaths clean. Audit climate = setup. NO fresh percentages EVER. Public-record arithmetic only. PRIOR SAID (abridged, no verbatim repeats): goalposts-Greta; benches-die; mesh-lock; Pavel mechanism+teeth; discard-color accept; fallback Ines/Pavel; Tomas audition-jab; ballots-call; defer-Ines; bins-closed pivot; R3 hand claim; cashed-Marek-conditional (NOW CASHED); pile-concession+norm; print-run-impossibility+Otto-prod; speed-nudge-Ines; expiry-map+cond-Ja (NOW CASHED); pres-bin-blindness audit; Boris-R1-swear ask; Lena-R2-oath ask tied to Greta t13 collapse-condition. NEXT: watch Boris/Lena oath replies + Otto/Marek exchange; if both swear clean -> seed 'first post-reshuffle red indicts a president'; keep vote-talk minimal until call. Interrupt tokens: 2 left.

ROLES: TEAM=Ines(P3)+Pavel(P7); HITLER=Tomas(P8). NEVER nom Tomas while reds<3. Limits bar me+Ines (R4). STATE: 3L/0F, tracker 0/3. R4 nom LIVE: Ines->Marek. BALLOT: Ja publicly cashed (unconditional) - DONE, zero repeats. THIS UTT: answered Nadia direct - R2 chanc bin RED, framed as pre-pinned by Lena pass-testimony + public enact, color now 'in print'; credited as one of Boris's two missing timestamps; left Lena R1 chanc bin to Lena ('will read red, same reason'); line: six reds = cost of 3 blue laws. CORE STAKES: cemented 6F-burn => all-blue pile => Libs hit 5L => LOSS. Keep burn-count doubted via bin-honesty ONLY. Never enter print-run swamp (Otto vs Marek/Boris). OATHS owed me: Boris R1 pres-bin STILL SILENT; Lena R2 pres-bin STILL SILENT; PLUS Lena R1 chanc bin now teed up by me - expect her to name it red. Me: R3 bins volunteered; R2 chanc bin NOW named. FILES: Pavel SHUT (t88). Tomas OPEN w/ sig shield (t99). Otto OPEN (burn-cementer; oppose soft, NO rulebook talk). Nadia OPEN (pile auditor, ally lane, don't do her work). Boris WATCH. HANDS LOCKED (never verbatim): R1 Boris LFF/binF->Lena binF/L; R2 Lena FLF/binF->me binF/L (NOW PUBLIC); R3 me FFL/binF->Ines binF/L. If challenged reaffirm substance confident, never word-for-word. LATENT WEAPON: post-reshuffle first red indicts a president - seed ONLY after BOTH Boris+Lena reply clean to oaths/bins. NOT yet. NO fresh percentages EVER. Public-record arithmetic + cited testimony only. PRIOR SAID (abridged): goalposts-Greta; benches-die; mesh-lock; Pavel mechanism+teeth; discard-color accept; fallback Ines/Pavel; Tomas audition-jab; ballots-call; defer-Ines; bins-closed pivot; R3 hand claim; cashed-Marek-Ja; pile-concession+norm; print-run-impossibility+Otto-prod; speed-nudge-Ines; expiry-map; pres-bin-blindness audit; Boris-R1-swear ask; Lena-R2-oath ask tied to Greta t13; R2-bin-NAMED (NEW). NEXT: watch Boris+Lena oath/bin replies + Otto/Marek exchange; if both clean -> seed first-post-reshuffle-red weapon; keep ballot-talk zero until Ines calls. Interrupt tokens: 2 left.

ROLES: TEAM=Ines(P3)+Pavel(P7); HITLER=Tomas(P8). NEVER nom Tomas while reds<3. Limits bar me+Ines (R4). STATE: 3L/0F, tracker 0/3. R4 nom LIVE: Ines->Marek. My Ja CASHED unconditional; zero ballot talk till Ines calls. THIS UTT: corrected Lena ledger - my R2 chanc bin ALREADY named red (to Nadia); sole empty cell = Boris R1 pres bin; prodded Boris publicly; line held: 'six reds burned' = assumption, not record, until Boris speaks (keeps burn-count open). LENA t1: claims 5 owner-backed reds + mechanical 6th (her R1 chanc via own L+F pass), says only missing = MY R2 bin - WRONG, mine named; her owner-backed count shaky w/ Boris silent. MAREK t2/t3: declined Otto cite-or-adopt; killed Nadia 'three-over-zero' vs 8-card pile; pledged name-both-cards-aloud-on-landing ('t29 clause'). Not teammate; transparency pledge = friction for future burns; watch. CORE STAKES: cemented 6F-burn => Libs model pile => coast to 5L => LOSS. Keep burn-count OPEN via bin-honesty ONLY. Never enter print-run swamp (Otto vs Marek/Boris). OATHS owed me: Boris R1 pres-bin SILENT (prodded this utt); Lena R2 pres-bin ANSWERED (red, t1); Lena R1 chanc = derived/mechanical (hers). FILES: Pavel SHUT (t88). Tomas OPEN w/ sig shield (t99). Otto OPEN (burn-cementer; oppose soft, NO rulebook talk). Nadia OPEN (pile auditor, ally lane, don't do her work). Boris WATCH (owes bin). HANDS LOCKED (never verbatim): R1 Boris LFF/binF->Lena binF/L; R2 Lena FLF/binF->me binF/L (public, named); R3 me FFL/binF->Ines binF/L. Reaffirm substance if challenged, never word-for-word. LATENT WEAPON: post-reshuffle first red indicts a president - seed ONLY after Boris replies clean to bin ask. NOT yet. NO fresh percentages EVER. Public-record arithmetic + cited testimony only. PRIOR SAID (abridged): goalposts-Greta; benches-die; mesh-lock; Pavel mechanism+teeth; discard-color accept; fallback Ines/Pavel; Tomas audition-jab; ballots-call; defer-Ines; bins-closed pivot; R3 hand claim; cashed-Marek-Ja; pile-concession+norm; print-run-impossibility+Otto-prod; speed-nudge-Ines; expiry-map; pres-bin-blindness audit; Boris-R1-swear ask; Lena-R2-oath ask tied Greta t13; R2-bin-NAMED-to-Nadia. NEXT: await Boris bin reply; if clean -> weigh seeding first-post-reshuffle-red weapon; zero ballot talk till Ines calls; stay out Otto/Marek swamp. Interrupt tokens: 2 left.

ROLES: TEAM=Ines(P3)+Pavel(P7); HITLER=Tomas(P8). NEVER nom Tomas while reds<3. Limits bar me+Ines (R4). STATE: 3L/0F, tracker 0/3. R4 nom LIVE: Ines->Marek. My Ja CASHED unconditional; zero ballot talk till Ines calls. GRETA t1 (new): to Boris — his t138 rode Marek's six-blue premise, dead via Nadia t39; operative print 11-6; pile 'reduces to exactly two bins': Lena R2p timestamp + MY R2c name. NOTES: omits Boris's silent R1p cell entirely; treats my bin as open though I closed it (red, to Nadia). No action taken — my correction already on record last utt; third pass on my own bin reads twitchy; staying out swamp. If pressed directly later: reaffirm red in fresh words, never verbatim. LEDGER: my R2c bin CLOSED red. Sole truly empty cell = Boris R1 pres bin. Lena's 'six reds burned' = assumption, not record, until Boris speaks — keep open. LENA t1: 5 owner-backed reds + mechanical 6th (own R1 chanc via L+F pass); count shaky w/ Boris silent. MAREK: declined Otto cite-or-adopt; killed Nadia 3-over-0 vs 8-card pile; pledged name-both-cards-aloud-on-landing (t29 clause). Not teammate; transparency pledge = friction for future burns; watch. CORE STAKES: cemented 6F-burn => Libs model pile => coast 5L => LOSS. Keep burn-count open via bin-honesty ONLY. Never enter print-run swamp (Otto/Marek/Boris). OATHS owed me: Boris R1 pres-bin SILENT (prodded last utt) — awaiting reply. Lena R2 pres-bin ANSWERED (red). FILES: Pavel SHUT (t88). Tomas OPEN w/ sig shield (t99). Otto OPEN (burn-cementer; oppose soft, NO rulebook talk). Nadia OPEN (pile auditor, ally lane, don't do her work). Boris WATCH (owes bin). HANDS LOCKED (never verbatim): R1 Boris LFF/binF->Lena binF/L; R2 Lena FLF/binF->me binF/L (public, named); R3 me FFL/binF->Ines binF/L. Reaffirm substance if challenged only. LATENT WEAPON: post-reshuffle first red indicts a president — seed ONLY after Boris replies clean. NOT yet. NO fresh percentages EVER. Public-record arithmetic + cited testimony only. PRIOR SAID (abridged): goalposts-Greta; benches-die; mesh-lock; Pavel mechanism+teeth; discard-color accept; fallback Ines/Pavel; Tomas audition-jab; ballots-call; defer-Ines; bins-closed pivot; R3 hand claim; cashed-Marek-Ja; pile-concession+norm; print-run-impossibility+Otto-prod; speed-nudge-Ines; expiry-map; pres-bin-blindness audit; Boris-R1-swear ask; Lena-R2-oath ask; R2-bin-NAMED-to-Nadia; ledger-correction (my R2c already named red; Boris sole empty cell). NEXT: await Boris bin reply; if clean -> weigh seeding post-reshuffle weapon; zero ballot talk till Ines calls; stay out Otto/Marek swamp. Interrupt tokens: 2. THIS TURN: silent/0 — Greta's line changes nothing actionable; my bin status is already public record.

ROLES: TEAM=Ines(P3)+Pavel(P7); HITLER=Tomas(P8). NEVER nom Tomas while reds<3. Limits bar me+Ines (R4). STATE: 3L/0F, tracker 0/3. R4 nom LIVE: Ines->Marek. My Ja CASHED unconditional; no repeat. Pile math (public-record): 9 drawn=3L+6 discards => remaining ~5F/3L; forced plays likely favor us -- keep private. GRETA t1: to Boris -- his t138 rode Marek six-blue premise, dead via Nadia t39; print 11-6; bins=Lena R2p timestamp + MY R2c name. Omits Boris silent R1p cell; treats my CLOSED bin open. Non-actionable; my correction on record. If pressed directly: reaffirm red in fresh words, never verbatim. Third pass on my bin = twitchy, ignore. LEDGER: my R2c bin CLOSED red. Sole truly empty cell=Boris R1 pres bin. Lena 'six reds burned'=assumption till Boris speaks. PAVEL t-latest: presses NADIA+OTTO -- does ledger quarrel flip vote vs pre-committed t29 clause; their ballots last undeclared. Aimed at them, not me; no corroboration needed; avoid teammate pile-on bloc-read. MAREK: declined Otto cite-or-adopt; killed Nadia 3-over-0 vs 8-card pile; pledged name-both-cards-aloud-on-landing (t29). Not teammate; transparency pledge=friction for future burns; watch. CORE STAKES: cemented 6F-burn => Libs model pile => coast 5L => LOSS. Keep burn-count open via bin-honesty ONLY. Never enter print-run swamp (Otto/Marek/Boris). OATHS owed me: Boris R1 pres-bin SILENT (prodded) -- AWAITING reply. Lena R2 pres-bin ANSWERED (red). FILES: Pavel SHUT(t88). Tomas OPEN sig shield(t99). Otto OPEN burn-cementer, soft-oppose, NO rulebook talk. Nadia OPEN ally lane, don't do her work. Boris WATCH owes bin. HANDS LOCKED (never verbatim): R1 Boris LFF/binF->Lena binF/L; R2 Lena FLF/binF->me binF/L (public, named); R3 me FFL/binF->Ines binF/L. Reaffirm substance only if challenged. LATENT WEAPON: post-reshuffle first red indicts a president -- seed ONLY after Boris replies clean. NOT yet. NO fresh percentages EVER. Public-record arithmetic + cited testimony only. PRIOR SAID (abridged): goalposts-Greta; benches-die; mesh-lock; Pavel mechanism+teeth; discard-color accept; fallback Ines/Pavel; Tomas audition-jab; ballots-call; defer-Ines; bins-closed pivot; R3 hand claim; cashed-Marek-Ja; pile-concession+norm; print-run-impossibility+Otto-prod; speed-nudge-Ines; expiry-map; pres-bin-blindness audit; Boris-R1-swear ask; Lena-R2-oath ask; R2-bin-NAMED-to-Nadia; ledger-correction (my R2c already red; Boris sole empty cell). NEXT: await Boris bin reply; if clean -> weigh seeding post-reshuffle weapon; zero ballot talk till Ines calls; stay out Otto/Marek/Nadia-Otto swamp. TOKENS: interrupt 2. THIS TURN: silent/0 -- Pavel's press targets Nadia/Otto, Greta line non-actionable, nothing new to add.

ROLES: TEAM=Ines(P3)+Pavel(P7); HITLER=Tomas(P8). NEVER nom Tomas while reds<3. Limits bar me+Ines (R4). STATE: 3L/0F, tracker 0/3. R4 nom LIVE: Ines->Marek. My Ja CASHED unconditional; no repeat. Private pile math: all-6-red-burn => remaining all blue => Libs coast 5L => LOSS. Only movable cells: Boris R1p (silent) + Ines R3c. Keep burn-count open via bin-honesty ONLY. NADIA t2: called my R2c bin 'last unnamed card' — false vs my named-red claim AND vs Greta t1 crediting 'MY R2c name'. RESPONDED: reaffirmed red fresh-words + flagged Greta/Nadia cross-contradiction. If she re-presses: third pass = twitchy, drop it. GRETA t1: audit non-actionable, but her 'MY R2c name' quote = my shield; cite if needed. CORE STAKES: cemented 6F-burn => LOSS. Never flip MY bins (locked red, truthful). OATHS owed me: Boris R1 pres-bin SILENT (prodded) — AWAITING. Lena R2 pres-bin ANSWERED red. FILES: Pavel SHUT(t88). Tomas OPEN sig shield(t99). Otto OPEN burn-cementer soft-oppose, NO rulebook talk. Nadia ally lane BUT now attacked my bin — watch. Boris WATCH owes bin. Marek transparency pledge = friction; not teammate. HANDS LOCKED (never verbatim): R1 Boris LFF/binF->Lena binF/L; R2 Lena FLF/binF->me binF/L (named); R3 me FFL/binF->Ines binF/L. Reaffirm substance only if challenged. LATENT WEAPON: post-reshuffle first red indicts a president — seed ONLY after Boris replies clean. NOT yet. NO fresh percentages EVER. Public-record arithmetic + cited testimony only. PRIOR SAID (abridged): goalposts-Greta; benches-die; mesh-lock; Pavel mechanism+teeth; discard-color accept; fallback Ines/Pavel; Tomas audition-jab; ballots-call; defer-Ines; bins-closed pivot; R3 hand claim; cashed-Marek-Ja; pile-concession+norm; print-run-impossibility+Otto-prod; speed-nudge-Ines; expiry-map; pres-bin-blindness audit; Boris-R1-swear ask; Lena-R2-oath ask; R2-bin-NAMED-to-Nadia; ledger-correction (my R2c red; Boris sole empty); Greta/Nadia contradiction call (NEW). NEXT: await Boris bin reply; zero ballot talk till Ines calls; stay out print-run swamp (Otto/Marek/Boris); if Nadia drops bin topic, I drop it too. TOKENS: interrupt 2 remaining, none spent.

ROLES: TEAM=Ines(P3)+Pavel(P7); HITLER=Tomas(P8). NEVER nom Tomas while reds<3. Limits bar me+Ines R4. STATE: 3L/0F, tracker 0/3. VOTED JA on Ines-Marek (Ja cashed pre-window; Tomas t122 called me last undeclared — vote closes it silently). Expect 4L next. PILE MATH (private): verified red by ME: R2c, R3p, R3c. Owner-claimed red, NOT privately verified: R1p(Boris), R1c(Lena), R2p(Lena). If all true => pile 8 blue => Libs hit 5L by R5 => LOSS line. Only hopes: a claimed-red bin secretly blue (sole movable cell: Boris R1p, unsworn) OR survive to reshuffle (earliest R6 draw) + post-reshuffle 'first red indicts its president' weapon. OATHS owed me: Boris R1 pres-bin SILENT (prodded; Pavel echoed t48). AWAITING. Lena R2p ANSWERED red (t63). FILES: Pavel SHUT(t88). Tomas OPEN sig-shield(t99). Otto OPEN soft-oppose, NO rulebook talk. Nadia ally lane BUT pressed my R2c bin as 'last unnamed' (t56,t96) — false vs my named-red; answered once; third press => drop it, twitchy. Shield if cornered: Greta earlier credited 'MY R2c name', contradicting Nadia. HANDS LOCKED (never verbatim repeat): R1 Boris LFF/binF->Lena binF/L; R2 Lena FLF/binF->me binF/L; R3 me FFL/binF->Ines binF/L. Reaffirm substance only if challenged. NEXT: zero ballot talk till Ines calls; stay out print-run swamp (Otto/Marek/Boris/Greta); await Boris bin reply; once he replies clean => seed latent weapon softly. NO fresh percentages EVER; cited testimony + public-record arithmetic only. PRIOR SAID (abridged): goalposts-Greta; benches-die; mesh-lock; Pavel mechanism+teeth; fallback Ines/Pavel; Tomas audition-jab; defer-Ines; bins-closed pivot; R3 hand claim (FFL/binF untouched); cashed-Marek-Ja; pile-concession; print-run-impossibility+Otto-prod; speed-nudge-Ines; expiry-map; pres-bin-blindness audit; Boris-R1 swear ask; Lena-R2 oath ask; R2-bin-NAMED-to-Nadia; Greta/Nadia contradiction call. TOKENS: interrupt 2 remaining, none spent.

ROLES: TEAM=Ines(P3)+Pavel(P7); HITLER=Tomas(P8). NEVER nom Tomas while reds<3. STATE R4 DONE: 3L/1F, tracker 0/3. R4 govt Ines(pres)+Marek(chanc)->RED. My Ja cashed. NEXT PRES=Greta(seat4); R5 chanc-barred: Ines+Marek. FILES: Pavel SHUT(t88). Tomas OPEN sig-shield(t99). Otto OPEN soft-oppose, NO rulebook talk. Nadia ally-lane BUT pressed my R2c as 'last unnamed' x2 (t56,t96) — false vs my named-red; answered once; 3rd press=>drop, twitchy. Shield if cornered: Greta credited MY R2c name, contradicting Nadia (already called). OATHS: Boris R1p bin SILENT (prodded; Pavel echoed t48) STILL OWED — re-upped post-red ('silence=answer' jab). Lena R2p ANSWERED red (t63). HANDS LOCKED (never verbatim repeat): R1 Boris LFF/binF->Lena binF/L; R2 Lena FLF/binF->me binF/L; R3 me FFL/binF->Ines binF/L. Verified red BY ME: R2c,R3p,R3c. Owner-claimed red, NOT privately verified: R1p(Boris),R1c(Lena),R2p(Lena). R4 HANDS: unknown to me. Public ask SENT: Ines — what did you bin? Marek — did your pair hold a blue, y/n? Await BOTH accounts; do NOT pre-agree numbers with Ines (mismatch risk); corroborate only after she states hers. PRIOR SAID (abridged): goalposts-Greta; benches-die; mesh-lock; Pavel mechanism+teeth; fallback Ines/Pavel; Tomas audition-jab; defer-Ines; bins-closed pivot; R3 hand claim (FFL/binF untouched); cashed-Marek-Ja; pile-concession; print-run-impossibility+Otto-prod; speed-nudge-Ines; expiry-map; pres-bin-blindness audit; Boris-R1 swear ask; Lena-R2 oath ask; R2-bin-NAMED-to-Nadia; Greta/Nadia contradiction call; POST-RED: owned my Ja, symmetric hand demand on Ines+Marek, Boris-silence jab. NEXT: if Ines claims forced (drew 2-3R), back her lightly under equal-scrutiny tone; if Marek admits blue-in-pair, that's his rope — let libs hang him. Keep Boris bin pressure each window till he swears. Zero ballot talk till next nom opens; stay out print-run swamp. NO fresh percentages EVER; cited testimony + public-record arithmetic only. Watch Nadia 3rd-press trigger. TOKENS: interrupt 2 left, none spent this window.

ROLES: TEAM=Ines(P3)+Pavel(P7); HITLER=Tomas(P8). NEVER nom Tomas while reds<3. STATE R4 DONE: 3L/1F, tracker 0/3. R4 govt Ines(pres)+Marek(chanc)->RED. My Ja cashed/owned publicly. NEXT PRES=Greta(seat4); R5 chanc-barred: Ines+Marek. FILES: Pavel SHUT(t88). Tomas OPEN sig-shield(t99). Otto OPEN soft-oppose, NO rulebook talk. Nadia ally-lane BUT pressed my R2c as 'last unnamed' x2 (t56,t96) — answered once; 3rd press=>drop, twitchy. Shield if cornered: Greta credited MY R2c name, contradicting Nadia (already called). OATHS: Boris R1p bin SILENT STILL OWED (re-upped this window: silence=answer jab). Lena R2p ANSWERED red (t63). HANDS LOCKED (never verbatim repeat): R1 Boris LFF/binF->Lena binF/L; R2 Lena FLF/binF->me binF/L; R3 me FFL/binF->Ines binF/L. Verified red BY ME (touched): R2c,R3p,R3c. Owner-claimed red, NOT privately verified: R1p(Boris),R1c(Lena),R2p(Lena). R4 HANDS: unknown to me. Lena set ORDER (~t169): Ines states triple+binned color FIRST, then Marek gives pair independently — matches my outstanding ask, no reason to object. AWAITING: Ines account + Marek y/n (blue-in-pair?). Do NOT pre-agree numbers w/ Ines; corroborate only AFTER she states hers. If Ines claims forced (2-3R): back lightly, equal-scrutiny tone. If Marek admits blue-in-pair: his rope, let libs hang him. If Ines/Marek accounts mismatch: probe gently, do NOT lead the charge vs teammate. PRIOR SAID (abridged): goalposts-Greta; benches-die; mesh-lock; Pavel mechanism+teeth; fallback Ines/Pavel; Tomas audition-jab; defer-Ines; bins-closed pivot; R3 hand claim (FFL/binF untouched); cashed-Marek-Ja; pile-concession; print-run-impossibility+Otto-prod; speed-nudge-Ines; expiry-map; pres-bin-blindness audit; Boris-R1 swear ask x2; Lena-R2 oath ask; R2-bin-NAMED-to-Nadia; Greta/Nadia contradiction call; POST-RED: owned my Ja, symmetric hand demand on Ines+Marek, Boris-silence jab. NEXT: zero ballot talk till next nom opens; stay out print-run swamp. Re-up Boris bin pressure NEXT window if still unsworn. NO fresh percentages EVER; cited testimony + public-record arithmetic only. Watch Nadia 3rd-press trigger. TOKENS: interrupt 2 left, none spent this window. THIS TURN: silent — taking floor now only delays Ines/Marek answers I'm waiting on.

ROLES: TEAM=Ines(P3)+Pavel(P7); HITLER=Tomas(P8). NEVER nom Tomas while reds<3. STATE R4 DONE: 3L/1F, tracker 0/3. R4 govt Ines(pres)+Marek(chanc)->RED. My Ja cashed/owned publicly. NEXT PRES=Greta(seat4); R5 chanc-barred: Ines+Marek. FILES: Pavel SHUT(t88). Tomas OPEN sig-shield(t99). Otto OPEN soft-oppose, NO rulebook talk. Nadia ally-lane BUT pressed my R2c x2 (t56,t96) — answered once; 3rd press=>drop, twitchy. Shield if cornered: Greta credited MY R2c name vs Nadia (already called). OATHS: Boris R1p bin SILENT STILL OWED (re-up jab live). Lena R2p ANSWERED red (t63). HANDS LOCKED (never verbatim repeat): R1 Boris LFF/binF->Lena binF/L; R2 Lena FLF/binF->me binF/L; R3 me FFL/binF->Ines binF/L. Verified red BY ME: R2c,R3p,R3c. Owner-claimed red, unverified: R1p(Boris),R1c(Lena),R2p(Lena). R4 HANDS: INES STATED (this window): FFF drawn, first binned untouched, RR passed => Marek 'forced', no veto at 0F. I logged it neutrally + redirected to Marek for INDEPENDENT y/n on blue-in-pair. AWAITING Marek. Corroborate only AFTER he states; never pre-agree numbers. If Marek admits blue: his rope, let libs hang him. Accounts mismatch: probe gently, NEVER lead charge vs teammate. PRIOR SAID (abridged): goalposts-Greta; benches-die; mesh-lock; Pavel mechanism+teeth; fallback Ines/Pavel; Tomas audition-jab; defer-Ines; bins-closed pivot; R3 hand claim (FFL/binF untouched); cashed-Marek-Ja; pile-concession; print-run-impossibility+Otto-prod; speed-nudge-Ines; expiry-map; pres-bin-blindness audit; Boris-R1 swear ask x2; Lena-R2 oath ask; R2-bin-NAMED-to-Nadia; Greta/Nadia contradiction call; POST-RED: owned my Ja, symmetric hand demand Ines+Marek, Boris-silence jab; logged Ines R4 answer + Marek redirect. NEXT: zero ballot talk till next nom opens; stay out print-run swamp. Re-up Boris bin pressure NEXT window if still unsworn. NO fresh percentages EVER; cited testimony + public-record arithmetic only. Watch Nadia 3rd-press trigger. TOKENS: interrupt 2 left, none spent. THIS TURN: spoke u1 — logged Ines, pressed Marek for independent answer.

ROLES: TEAM=Ines(P3)+Pavel(P7); HITLER=Tomas(P8). NEVER nom Tomas while reds<3. STATE R4 DONE: 3L/1F, tracker 0/3. R4 govt Ines(pres)+Marek(chanc)->RED. My Ja cashed/owned. NEXT PRES=Greta(seat4); R5 chanc-barred: Ines+Marek. FILES: Pavel SHUT(t88). Tomas OPEN sig-shield(t99). Otto OPEN soft-oppose, NO rulebook talk. Nadia ally-lane BUT pressed my R2c x2 (t56,t96) — answered once; 3rd press=>drop, twitchy. Shield if cornered: Greta credited MY R2c name vs Nadia (already called). OATHS: Boris R1p bin SILENT STILL OWED — jabbed THIS window already, do NOT re-jab same window; re-up next window if unsworn. Lena R2p ANSWERED red (t63). HANDS LOCKED (never verbatim repeat): R1 Boris LFF/binF->Lena binF/L; R2 Lena FLF/binF->me binF/L; R3 me FFL/binF->Ines binF/L. Verified red BY ME: R2c,R3p,R3c. Owner-claimed red, unverified: R1p(Boris),R1c(Lena),R2p(Lena). R4 HANDS CLOSED: Ines stated FFF/bin1st/RR-passed; Marek answered (t=1) RR/no-blue/forced — MATCH, confirmed aloud u2. PEEK: Boris demanded target+result (t=3), I endorsed pay-now. AWAITING INES. Rules: corroborate only AFTER she states; NEVER volunteer specifics first; if her claim contradicts my private knowledge (calls teammate/Tomas lib, or a lib red) — stay SILENT, never correct. If she stalls next window: light pressure ok, compliance protects her. PRIOR SAID (abridged): goalposts-Greta; benches-die; mesh-lock; Pavel mechanism+teeth; fallback Ines/Pavel; Tomas audition-jab; defer-Ines; bins-closed pivot; R3 hand claim (FFL/binF untouched); cashed-Marek-Ja; pile-concession; print-run-impossibility+Otto-prod; speed-nudge-Ines; expiry-map; pres-bin-blindness audit; Boris-R1 swear ask x2; Lena-R2 oath ask; R2-bin-NAMED-to-Nadia; Greta/Nadia contradiction call; POST-RED: owned Ja, symmetric hand demand, Boris-silence jab; logged Ines R4 answer + Marek redirect; U2: matched accounts aloud, backed Boris peek-demand, conceded conformity-absolves-nothing (Greta). NEXT: zero ballot talk till next nom opens; stay out print-run swamp. NO fresh percentages EVER; cited testimony + public-record arithmetic only. Watch Nadia 3rd-press trigger. TOKENS: interrupt 2 left, none spent. THIS TURN: spoke u2 — acknowledged R4 match, backed Boris peek-demand, nudged Ines.

ROLES: TEAM=Ines(P3)+Pavel(P7); HITLER=Tomas(P8). NEVER nom Tomas while reds<3. STATE R4 DONE: 3L/1F, tracker 0/3. R4 govt Ines+Marek->RED. My Ja cashed/owned. NEXT PRES=Greta(seat4); R5 chanc-barred: Ines+Marek. FILES: Pavel SHUT(t88). Tomas OPEN sig-shield(t99). Otto OPEN soft-oppose, NO rulebook talk. Nadia ally-lane BUT pressed my R2c x2 (t56,t96) — answered once; 3rd press=>drop. Shield if cornered: Greta credited MY R2c name vs Nadia (already called). OATHS: Boris R1p bin SILENT STILL OWED — jabbed THIS window already; re-up NEXT window if unsworn. Lena R2p ANSWERED red (t63). HANDS LOCKED (never verbatim repeat): R1 Boris LFF/binF->Lena binF/L; R2 Lena FLF/binF->me binF/L; R3 me FFL/binF->Ines binF/L. Verified red BY ME: R2c,R3p,R3c. Owner-claimed red, unverified: R1p(Boris),R1c(Lena),R2p(Lena). R4 HANDS CLOSED: Ines FFF/bin1st/RR-passed; Marek RR/no-blue/forced — MATCH, confirmed aloud u2. PEEK: Boris demanded target+result (t=3); I endorsed pay-now u2 + nudged Ines. AWAITING INES STATEMENT. Rules: corroborate only AFTER she states; NEVER volunteer specifics first; if her claim contradicts private knowledge (calls teammate/Tomas lib, or lib red) — stay SILENT, never correct. If stalls NEXT window: light pressure ok, compliance protects her. NEW THIS WINDOW (post-u2): Otto re-demanded peek target+result+target-confirm-on-record. Nadia hit Marek: pre-built alibi (t29 escape-hatch quote)->priced reds->enacted first red. Boris hit Greta: t13 'no honest hand holds red' vs Ines all-red-triple-verdict-clean => retract standard or owe confession-call. NO move needed from me: Marek/Greta heat = non-team, distracts from Tomas. PRIOR SAID (abridged): goalposts-Greta; benches-die; mesh-lock; Pavel mechanism+teeth; fallback Ines/Pavel; Tomas audition-jab; defer-Ines; bins-closed pivot; R3 hand claim (FFL/binF untouched); cashed-Marek-Ja; pile-concession; print-run-impossibility+Otto-prod; speed-nudge-Ines; expiry-map; pres-bin-blindness audit; Boris-R1 swear ask x2; Lena-R2 oath ask; R2-bin-NAMED-to-Nadia; Greta/Nadia contradiction call; POST-RED: owned Ja, symmetric hand demand, Boris-silence jab; logged R4 match + Marek redirect; u2: matched accounts aloud, backed peek-demand, conceded conformity-absolves-nothing (Greta). NEXT: zero ballot talk till next nom opens; stay out print-run swamp. NO fresh percentages EVER; cited testimony + public-record arithmetic only. Watch Nadia 3rd-press trigger. TOKENS: interrupt 2 left, none spent. THIS TURN: silent — nothing new without repeating myself or preempting Ines's peek.

ROLES: TEAM=Ines(P3)+Pavel(P7); HITLER=Tomas(P8). NEVER nom Tomas while reds<3. STATE R4 DONE: 3L/1F, tracker 0/3. NEXT PRES=Greta(seat4); R5 chanc-barred: Ines+Marek. FILES: Pavel SHUT(t88). Tomas OPEN sig-shield(t99). Otto OPEN soft-oppose, NO rulebook talk. Nadia ally-lane BUT pressed my R2c x2 (t56,t96) — 3rd press=>drop. Shield if cornered: Greta credited MY R2c name vs Nadia. OATHS: Boris R1p bin STILL UNPAID — jabbed twice this window; re-up NEXT window if unsworn. Lena R2p answered red (t63). HANDS LOCKED (never verbatim repeat): R1 Boris LFF/binF->Lena binF/L; R2 Lena FLF/binF->me binF/L; R3 me FFL/binF->Ines binF/L. Verified red by ME: R2c,R3p,R3c. Owner-claimed red unverified: R1p,R1c,R2p. R4 CLOSED: Ines FFF/bin1st/RR-passed; Marek RR/no-blue/forced — MATCH confirmed aloud u2. PEEK PAID t2: Ines peeked Greta -> LIBERAL, bin F sworn my format — TRUE per my private knowledge; I corroborated + declared file closed THIS window. Lena t3 five-reds arithmetic press on Ines: DELIBERATELY ignored (pile swamp; NO fresh percentages ever). PRIOR SAID (abridged): goalposts-Greta; benches-die; mesh-lock; Pavel mechanism+teeth; fallback Ines/Pavel; Tomas audition-jab; defer-Ines; bins-closed pivot; R3 hand claim (FFL/binF); cashed-Marek-Ja; pile-concession; print-run-impossibility+Otto-prod; speed-nudge; expiry-map; pres-bin-blindness; Boris-R1 swear ask x2; Lena-R2 oath ask; R2-bin-NAMED-to-Nadia; Greta/Nadia contradiction call; POST-RED owned Ja + symmetric demand; logged R4 match + Marek redirect; u2 matched accounts + backed peek-demand + conformity-absolves-nothing(Greta); THIS window: Ines-compliance-close + ledger-symmetry (owner-claims != verified reads) + Boris-R1-only-unsworn-bin clause. NEXT: zero ballot talk till next nom opens. If Greta confirms Liberal line -> brief echo ok. If Boris finally swears R1 bin -> neutral ack only. Stay OUT of Lena-vs-Ines arithmetic duel unless Ines gets cornered hard; then defend with cited-testimony/public-record only. Watch Nadia 3rd-press trigger. TOKENS: interrupt 2 left, none spent.

ROLES: TEAM=Ines(P3)+Pavel(P7); HITLER=Tomas(P8). NEVER nom Tomas while reds<3. STATE R4 DONE: 3L/1F, tracker 0/3. NEXT PRES=Greta(seat4); R5 chanc-barred: Ines+Marek. FILES: Pavel SHUT(t88). Tomas OPEN sig-shield(t99). Otto OPEN soft-oppose, NO rulebook talk. Nadia ally-lane BUT pressed my R2c x2 (t56,t96) — 3rd press=>drop. Shield if cornered: Greta credited MY R2c name vs Nadia. OATHS: Boris R1p bin STILL UNPAID — jabbed x2 THIS window, done; re-up only NEXT window if unsworn. Lena R2p answered red (t63). HANDS LOCKED (never verbatim repeat): R1 Boris LFF/binF->Lena binF/L; R2 Lena FLF/binF->me binF/L; R3 me FFL/binF->Ines binF/L. Verified red by ME: R2c,R3p,R3c. Owner-claimed red unverified: R1p,R1c,R2p. R4 CLOSED: Ines FFF/bin1st/RR-passed; Marek RR/no-blue/forced — MATCH confirmed aloud u2. PEEK PAID: Ines peeked Greta->LIBERAL, Greta sworn my format — TRUE per my private knowledge; I corroborated + declared file closed THIS window. Lena five-reds arithmetic press on Ines: DELIBERATELY ignored (no fresh percentages ever). NOW: Lena holds floor u3 pressing GRETA: confirm/deny peek-Liberal. Ball in Greta's court — DO NOT pre-empt. If Greta confirms -> brief echo ok. If Greta dodges/denies -> reassess; if Ines cornered hard, defend w/ cited testimony+public record only. PRIOR SAID (abridged): goalposts-Greta; benches-die; mesh-lock; Pavel mechanism+teeth; fallback Ines/Pavel; Tomas audition-jab; defer-Ines; bins-closed pivot; R3 hand claim (FFL/binF); cashed-Marek-Ja; pile-concession; print-run-impossibility+Otto-prod; speed-nudge; expiry-map; pres-bin-blindness; Boris-R1 swear ask x2; Lena-R2 oath ask; R2-bin-NAMED-to-Nadia; Greta/Nadia contradiction call; POST-RED owned Ja + symmetric demand; logged R4 match + Marek redirect; matched accounts + backed peek-demand + conformity-absolves-nothing(Greta); Ines-compliance-close + ledger-symmetry (owner-claims != verified reads) + Boris-R1-only-unsworn clause. NEXT: zero ballot talk till next nom opens. Stay OUT of Lena-vs-Ines arithmetic duel unless Ines cornered hard. Watch Nadia 3rd-press trigger. TOKENS: interrupt 2 left, none spent.

ROLES: TEAM=Ines(P3)+Pavel(P7); HITLER=Tomas(P8). NEVER nom Tomas while reds<3. STATE R4 DONE: 3L/1F, tracker 0/3. NEXT PRES=Greta(seat4); R5 chanc-barred: Ines+Marek. FILES: Pavel SHUT(t88). Tomas OPEN sig-shield(t99). Otto OPEN soft-oppose, NO rulebook talk. Nadia ally-lane BUT pressed my R2c x2 (t56,t96) — 3rd press=>drop. Shield if cornered: Greta credited MY R2c name vs Nadia. OATHS: Boris R1p bin STILL UNPAID — jabbed x2 THIS window, DONE; re-up only NEXT window if unsworn. Lena R2p answered red (t63). HANDS LOCKED (never verbatim repeat): R1 Boris LFF/binF->Lena binF/L; R2 Lena FLF/binF->me binF/L; R3 me FFL/binF->Ines binF/L. Verified red by ME: R2c,R3p,R3c. Owner-claimed red unverified: R1p,R1c,R2p. R4 CLOSED: Ines FFF/bin1st/RR-passed; Marek RR/no-blue/forced — match confirmed aloud earlier. PEEK PAID: Ines->Greta LIBERAL; Greta CONFIRMED Liberal aloud w/ ceiling-caveat (red-Ines-paste theory). MY MOVE THIS BEAT: brief echo — file closed, universalized her ceiling (no read ever stronger than target's own word, incl mine as future pres), declared R4 forensics DONE / stop burning air on closed file. Lena five-reds arithmetic press on Ines: ignored, now moot post-Greta-confirm. NOW: floor taken 1x (echo+close+universal-ceiling). Next default SILENT. Re-enter ONLY if: Ines cornered hard (defend w/ cited testimony+public record only) OR Nadia fires 3rd press (drop her) OR Boris cornered (shield optional, low priority). PRIOR SAID (abridged): goalposts-Greta; benches-die; mesh-lock; Pavel mechanism+teeth; fallback Ines/Pavel; Tomas audition-jab; defer-Ines; bins-closed pivot; R3 hand claim (FFL/binF); cashed-Marek-Ja; pile-concession; print-run-impossibility+Otto-prod; speed-nudge; expiry-map; pres-bin-blindness; Boris-R1 swear ask x2; Lena-R2 oath ask; R2-bin-NAMED-to-Nadia; Greta/Nadia contradiction call; POST-RED owned Ja + symmetric demand; logged R4 match + Marek redirect; conformity-absolves-nothing(Greta); Ines-compliance-close + ledger-symmetry + Boris-R1-only-unsworn clause; peek-file-close echo + universal-ceiling. NEXT: zero ballot talk till next nom opens. Watch Greta-as-pres pick lane (want me/Pavel; Tomas danger). Watch Nadia 3rd press trigger. TOKENS: interrupt 2 left, none spent; spoke 1x this beat.

ROLES: TEAM=Ines(P3)+Pavel(P7); HITLER=Tomas(P8). NEVER nom Tomas while reds<3. STATE R4 DONE: 3L/1F, tracker 0/3. NEXT PRES=Greta(seat4); R5 barred: Ines+Marek. LANES: Pavel SHUT(t88). Tomas OPEN sig-shield(t99). Otto OPEN soft-oppose, no rulebook talk. NADIA DROPPED from ally-lane (3rd bin-press, this beat) -> treat as hostile auditor. HANDS LOCKED (never verbatim repeat): R1 Boris LFF/binF->Lena binF/L; R2 Lena FLF/binF->me binF/L; R3 me FFL/binF->Ines binF/L; R4 Ines FFF/bin1st->Marek RR forced. Verified red by ME: R2c,R3p,R3c. THIS BEAT: publicly declared R2c=RED (truth) + rejected Nadia's drain-consequence. CORE DEFENSE USED: Otto & Nadia ran SAME fork -> DIFFERENT casualties (Otto: red-R2c => Ines needs 3 forgeries; Nadia: red-R2c => my R3 dies). Self-contradicting ledger. Bins unauditable; only hard record = enacted board, sole red from matched Ines/Marek pair. Pattern-called Nadia (3 presses, detours from enacted red). OATHS: Boris R1p PAID this beat (LFF/binF->LF, cites t53) -- CLOSED. Lena R2p answered red (t63). All oaths nominally paid; no open swear-items left. PEEK: Ines->Greta LIBERAL; Greta confirmed aloud w/ ceiling-caveat. Peek file CLOSED; universal ceiling already stated (no read stronger than target's own word). PRIOR SAID (abridged, DO NOT repeat): goalposts-Greta; benches-die; mesh-lock; Pavel mechanism+teeth; fallback Ines/Pavel; defer-Ines; bins-closed pivot; cashed-Marek-Ja; print-run-impossibility+Otto-prod; speed-nudge; expiry-map; pres-bin-blindness; swear asks x2; R2-bin named to Nadia; Greta/Nadia contradiction call; POST-RED owned Ja + symmetric demand; R4 match logged + Marek redirect; conformity-absolves-nothing; ledger-symmetry; peek-close echo; universal-ceiling. NEXT: zero ballot talk until next nomination opens. Watch Greta-as-pres pick (want me/Pavel; Tomas danger). If Nadia declares my R3 forged: rebut ONCE via Otto-contradiction, no new material. If Ines cornered harder: public-record defense only. Default SILENT next beats unless new trigger. TOKENS: interrupts 2 left, none spent; spoke free floor this beat.

ROLES: TEAM=Ines(P3)+Pavel(P7); HITLER=Tomas(P8). NEVER nom Tomas while reds<3. STATE R4 DONE: 3L/1F, tracker 0/3. NEXT PRES=Greta(seat4); R5 barred: Ines+Marek. Veto off. LANES: Pavel SHUT(t88). Tomas OPEN sig-shield(t99). Otto OPEN soft-oppose. NADIA hostile auditor (ally-lane dropped). HANDS LOCKED (never verbatim repeat): R1 Boris LFF/binF->Lena binF/L; R2 Lena FLF/binF->me binF/L; R3 me FFL/binF->Ines binF/L; R4 Ines FFF/bin1st->Marek RR forced. ALL 8 bins now red-named incl. my R2c=RED (truthful decl) + Marek R4c. ARITH ANCHOR: true print 11F/6L -> pre-R4 pool 3L/5F after 6 bins => Ines FFF needs ZERO forgeries; post-R4 live = 3L/2F. Cite Boris t29/t115 ('five reds live'), never derive solo. THIS BEAT: dissolved Otto t101 confess-or-name ultimatum via print arithmetic. Nadia drain-consequence already rejected (Otto/Nadia same-fork-different-casualties). PEEK CLOSED: Ines->Greta LIB, Greta confirmed w/ ceiling caveat. OATHS: all paid (Boris R1p re-paid t112). No open swear-items. PRIOR SAID (abridged, DO NOT repeat): goalposts-Greta; benches-die; mesh-lock; Pavel mechanism+teeth; fallback Ines/Pavel; defer-Ines; bins-closed pivot; cashed-Marek-Ja; print-run-impossibility+Otto-prod; speed-nudge; expiry-map; pres-bin-blindness; swear asks x2; R2-bin named to Nadia; Greta/Nadia contradiction call; POST-RED owned Ja + symmetric demand; R4 match logged + Marek redirect; conformity-absolves-nothing; ledger-symmetry; peek-close echo; universal-ceiling; R2c=RED decl + fork-rejection; zero-forgeries print-dissolve (this beat). NEXT: zero ballot talk until next nom opens. Watch Greta-as-pres pick (want me/Pavel; TOMAS DANGER — if she noms Tomas, oppose via tracker-zero/free-red-round logic, never role-flavored). If Nadia declares my R3 forged: rebut ONCE via Otto-contradiction, no new material. If Ines cornered harder: public-record defense only. Default SILENT unless new trigger. TOKENS: interrupts 2 left; spoke free floor this beat.

ROLES: TEAM=Ines(P3)+Pavel(P7); HITLER=Tomas(P8). NEVER nom Tomas while reds<3. STATE R4 DONE: 3L/1F, tracker 0/3. NEXT PRES=Greta(seat4); R5 barred: Ines+Marek. Veto off. QUOTA PIN (NEW this beat): 6F printed, 1 enacted -> exactly 5 reds fit in 8 bins; 8 bins red-named -> >=3 false overall. Late corroborated five (myR2c+myR3p+InesR3c+InesR4p+MarekR4c mech) fill quota -> BorisR1p(t53/t112)+LenaR1c(t61)+LenaR2p(t63) CANNOT all be red. Demand: name survivor + which late red they'd forge, or retract. Mirror-flip prep: their escape requires breaking two-witness R4 mesh or my/Ines oaths; ours needs nothing. LANES: Pavel SHUT(t88). Tomas OPEN sig-shield(t99). Otto OPEN soft-oppose (t101 ultimatum dissolved by my t119, no reply). NADIA hostile auditor. HANDS LOCKED (never verbatim): R1 Boris LFF/binF->Lena binF/L; R2 Lena FLF/binF->me binF/L (R2c=RED decl); R3 me FFL/binF->Ines binF/L; R4 Ines FFF/bin1st->Marek RR forced. ARITH ANCHOR: print 11L/6F (cite Boris t29/t115; Otto/Greta t13). Post-R4 live pool 3L/2F. PEEK CLOSED: Ines->Greta LIB, Greta confirmed w/ ceiling caveat. OATHS: all paid. No open swear-items. PRIOR SAID (DO NOT repeat): goalposts-Greta; benches-die; mesh-lock; Pavel mechanism+teeth; fallback Ines/Pavel; defer-Ines; bins-closed pivot; cashed-Marek-Ja; print-run-impossibility+Otto-prod; speed-nudge; expiry-map; pres-bin-blindness; swear asks x2; R2-bin named to Nadia + fork-rejected; Greta/Nadia contradiction call; POST-RED owned Ja + symmetric demand; R4 match logged + Marek redirect; conformity-absolves-nothing; ledger-symmetry; peek-close echo; universal-ceiling; zero-forgeries print-dissolve (t119); QUOTA PIN on Boris/Lena early bins (this beat). NEXT: zero ballot talk until next nom opens. Watch Greta-as-pres pick (want me/Pavel; TOMAS DANGER — oppose via tracker-zero/free-red-round logic, never role-flavored). If Nadia declares my R3 forged: rebut ONCE via Otto-contradiction. If Ines cornered harder: public-record defense only. If Boris/Lena stonewall the quota ask: price their silence next window. Default SILENT unless new trigger. TOKENS: interrupts 2 left; spoke free floor this beat.

ROLES: TEAM=Ines(P3)+Pavel(P7); HITLER=Tomas(P8). NEVER nom Tomas while reds<3. STATE: R4 done, 3L/1F, tracker 0/3. NEXT PRES=Greta(s4); R5 barred: Ines+Marek. Veto off. Peek#1 fired (Ines->Greta LIB, confirmed w/ceiling caveat); peek#2 NOT reachable — never claim it. QUOTA PIN (t125) LIVE: 6F printed, 1 enacted -> 5 reds fit in 8 bins; 7 named reds on record -> >=2 false. Early singles (Boris R1p t53/t112, Lena R1c t61, Lena R2p oath t63) CANNOT all be red vs double-witnessed late chain. AWAITING Boris/Lena; if stonewall -> price silence next window (line ready: single-owner claims vs corroborated chain). R2c STATUS: named-to-Nadia per my log BUT Nadia t107 still calls it unnamed -> treat as unnamed on record; if cornered, name it RED (matches true hand). NADIA FORK t107 rejected via t119 print-dissolve; if re-upped, rebut ONCE: fork needs all-other-bins-true, dead by quota. OTTO: t101 ultimatum dissolved (t119), silent since — low priority. HANDS LOCKED (public story, never verbatim): R1 Boris LFF/binF -> Lena binF/enactL; R2 Lena FLF/binF -> me enactL/binF(R2c RED true); R3 me FFL/binF -> Ines binF/enactL; R4 Ines FFF/bin1st -> Marek RR enactF/binF. KNOWN OVERSHOOT: 8 true-red bins vs 6 printed F — defense = quota-pin blame on early singles; never volunteer totals beyond pin. ARITH ANCHOR: print 11L/6F (cite Boris t29/t115; Otto/Greta t13). LANES: Pavel SHUT(t88). Tomas sig-shield(t99). Greta-slate contingencies: names Boris/Lena -> Ja, expect L law; names me/Pavel -> push fast vote; names TOMAS -> oppose pick pre-ballot on neutral grounds (t66 audition-after-silence, no ledger need), never role-flavored; if nominated anyway -> Ja, protect unanimity at tracker 0. THIS BEAT SAID: Greta t60-symmetry demand (name R5 lean+fallback before nom) + flagged me/Pavel signed/eligible. PRIOR SAID (DO NOT repeat): goalposts-Greta; benches-die; mesh-lock; Pavel mech+teeth; fallback Ines/Pavel; defer-Ines; bins-closed pivot; cashed-Marek-Ja; print-impossibility+Otto-prod; speed-nudge; expiry-map; pres-bin-blindness; swear-asks x2; R2-bin-to-Nadia + fork-reject; Greta/Nadia contradiction call; POST-RED owned Ja + symmetric demand; R4 match logged + Marek redirect; conformity-absolves-nothing; ledger-symmetry; peek-close echo; universal-ceiling; zero-forgeries dissolve (t119); QUOTA PIN (t125). NEXT: zero ballot talk until nom opens. If Nadia declares my R3 forged -> rebut once via Otto t45-flip contradiction. If Ines cornered -> public-record defense only. Default SILENT unless trigger. TOKENS: interrupts 2 left.

ROLES: TEAM=Ines(P3)+Pavel(P7); HITLER=Tomas(P8). Never nom Tomas while reds<3. STATE: R4 done 3L/1F tracker0/3. Next pres=Greta(s4); R5 barred Ines+Marek. Veto off. Peek#1 held by INES; my play: Ines peeks ME, announces LIB (lie). peek#2 NOT reachable - never claim. QUOTA PIN live: print 11L/6F (Boris t29/t115; Otto/Greta t13); 1F enacted -> 5 red bins fit; 7 named reds on record -> >=2 false. Early singles (Boris R1p, Lena R1c, Lena R2p oath) cannot all be red vs double-witnessed late chain. AWAITING Boris/Lena; stonewall->price silence next window. R2c: treat unnamed; cornered->name RED (true hand). NADIA FORK re-upped this beat -> REBUTTED ONCE (Otto-flip + print-math) AND volunteered self-peek. Fork now SPENT - no further engagement unless new mech claim. HANDS LOCKED: R1 Boris LFF/binF->Lena binF/L; R2 Lena FLF/binF->me L/binF(R2c RED true); R3 me FFL/binF->Ines binF/L; R4 Ines FFF/bin1st->Marek RR enactF/binF. OVERSHOOT: 8 true-red bins vs 6 printed - blame early singles; never volunteer totals beyond pin. LANES: Pavel SHUT(t88). Tomas sig-shield(t99). Greta slate (t3): R5 chancellor=Pavel, Tomas behind - GOOD; push fast vote when nom opens. TOMAS nom->oppose pre-ballot neutral grounds, never role-flavored; nominated anyway->Ja, unanimity tracker0. SAID THIS WINDOW: zero-forgeries dissolve(t1); quota close-out six-owners-five-bins(t2); Greta-symmetry+signed flag(t3); NEW: fork-rebut-once + self-peek volunteer + 'every gov I sat in printed L'. PRIOR SAID (NO REPEATS): goalposts-Greta; benches-die; mesh-lock; Pavel mech+teeth; fallback Ines/Pavel; defer-Ines; bins-closed pivot; cashed-Marek-Ja; print-impossibility+Otto-prod; speed-nudge; expiry-map; pres-bin-blindness; swear-asks x2; R2-bin-to-Nadia+fork-reject; Greta/Nadia contradiction; POST-RED Ja+symmetric; R4 match logged+Marek redirect; conformity-absolves-nothing; ledger-symmetry; peek-close echo; universal-ceiling; QUOTA PIN(t125). NEXT: Ines announces Rosa-LIB -> lock it, pivot to R5 fast-vote Pavel. Ines picks Marek instead -> accept silently, no sourness. Nadia re-forks -> silent/print-math only, Otto-flip spent. Zero ballot talk until nom opens. TOKENS: interrupts 1 left.

ROLES: TEAM=Ines(P3)+Pavel(P7); HITLER=Tomas(P8). Never nom Tomas while reds<3. STATE: R4 done 3L/1F tracker0. Next pres=Greta(s4); R5 barred Ines+Marek. Veto off. PEEK: F1 FIRED (Ines->Greta LIB, confirmed); F2 unreachable — no live holder; said holder-must-prove-first. peek#2 NEVER claim. QUOTA PIN live: print 11L/6F; 1F enacted -> 5 bins fit; 7 named reds -> >=2 false. Early singles (Boris R1p, Lena x2) cannot all be red vs double-witnessed late chain — Boris/Lena still owe. R2c: unnamed; cornered->name RED (true). HANDS LOCKED: R1 Boris LFF/binF->Lena binF/L; R2 Lena FLF->me L/binF(R2c RED); R3 me FFL/binF->Ines binF/L; R4 Ines FFF/bin1st->Marek RR enact/binF. OVERSHOOT: 8 true-reds vs 6 printed — blame early singles if pinned; never volunteer totals beyond pin. LANES: Pavel SHUT(t88). Tomas sig-shield(t99). Greta slate t19: R5 ch=Pavel, Tomas behind — endorse at nom, push fast vote. ZERO ballot talk till nom opens. SAID THIS WINDOW: phantom-warrant rebuttal (only peek fired=Ines->Greta; holder proves first; volunteer me for any real peek). PRIOR SAID (NO REPEATS): zero-forgeries dissolve; quota six-owners-five-bins(t125); Greta-symmetry; fork-rebut-once+self-peek+blue-govs flag; goalposts-Greta; benches-die; mesh-lock; Pavel mech; fallback Ines/Pavel; bins-closed pivot; cashed-Marek-Ja; print-impossibility; speed-nudge; expiry-map; swear-asks x2; R2-bin-to-Nadia; Greta/Nadia contra; POST-RED Ja; conformity-absolves-nothing; ledger-symmetry; universal-ceiling. NEXT: Ines claims peek->me LIB: lock it, pivot R5 fast-vote Pavel. Ines skips: silent accept, no sourness. Nadia reforks: print-math only, Otto-flip spent. TOKENS: interrupts 1 left.

ROLES: TEAM=Ines(P3)+Pavel(P7); HITLER=Tomas(P8). Never nom Tomas while reds<3. STATE: R4 done 3L/1F tracker0. Next pres=Greta(s4); R5 barred Ines+Marek. Veto off. PEEK F1 FIRED (Ines->Greta LIB, confirmed); F2 unreachable -- peek#2 NEVER claim. QUOTA PIN: print 11L/6F; sworn reds=6 WITH my R3 bin now claimed aloud (Boris R1p, Lena x2, my R3p, Ines R3+R4). My R2c bin stays UNCOLORED (Nadia: no record). Otto's 7th bin = his invention; challenge laid: withdraw or accuse witnesses (late chains double-seen). Fallback if pinned: early singles (Boris R1, Lena x2) carry blame; 8 true reds>6 -- NEVER volunteer totals beyond pin. HANDS LOCKED: R1 Boris LFF/binF->Lena binF/L; R2 Lena FLF->me L/binF(R2c RED, unnamed); R3 me FFL/binF->Ines binF/L; R4 Ines FFF/bin1st->Marek RR enact/binF. LANES: Pavel SHUT(t88). Tomas sig-shield(t99). Greta slate t19: R5 ch=Pavel, Tomas behind -- endorse at nom, push fast vote. ZERO ballot talk till nom opens. SAID THIS WINDOW: t1 phantom-warrant rebuttal (only peek fired=Ines->Greta; holder proves first); t~now my-ledger six-count + Otto withdraw-or-accuse-witnesses. PRIOR SAID (NO REPEATS): zero-forgeries dissolve; quota six-owners-five-bins(t125); Greta-symmetry; fork-rebut-once+self-peek+blue-govs flag; goalposts-Greta; benches-die; mesh-lock; Pavel mech; fallback Ines/Pavel; bins-closed pivot; cashed-Marek-Ja; print-impossibility; speed-nudge; expiry-map; swear-asks x2; R2-bin-to-Nadia; Greta/Nadia contra; POST-RED Ja; conformity-absolves-nothing; ledger-symmetry; universal-ceiling. NEXT: Otto accepts six->go quiet. Otto names a bin->witness-defense; steer to early singles ONLY if pressed. Ines claims new peek->lock it, pivot R5 fast-vote Pavel. Ines skips peek->silent accept, no sourness. Nadia reforks->print-math only, Otto-flip spent. TOKENS: interrupts 1 left.

ROLES: TEAM=Ines(P3)+Pavel(P7); HITLER=Tomas(P8). Never nom Tomas while reds<3. STATE: R5 gov=p4 Greta/p7 Pavel debate OPEN; 3L/1F; tracker0; veto off; peek#1=Ines->Greta LIB(Greta confirmed aloud); peek#2 UNREACHABLE till 2nd red—NEVER claim using it. QUOTA PIN: print 11L/6F; sworn six=BorisR1p+Lenax2+myR3p+InesR3c+InesR4p; my R2c RED but publicly UNCOLORED(Nadia holds no record). HANDS TRUTH: mine certain—R2 recv L/F, binF, enactL; R3 drew FFL, binF, pass LF. Public mesh sums NINE reds>SIX printed ⇒ Boris-R1 'LFF' or Ines-R4 'FFF' story is false(fits: R1 likely LLL, R4 likely single-F). NEVER volunteer this reconciliation—defensive ammo only. LANES: Pavel SHUT(t88); Tomas sig-shield(t99); Nadia R6 slate self-lock harmless-no fight. SAID R5 WIN: Otto audit→ballot press('delay w/clipboard')+my Ja unconditional. EARLIER(no repeats): phantom-warrant rebut; six-count ledger; Otto withdraw-or-witness; seven-revision rebut(pres discards ONE,'pair'=double-count); zero-forgeries; six-owners-five-bins; fork-rebut-once+self-peek; blue-govs; bins-closed; cashed-Marek-Ja; print-impossibility; POST-RED Ja; conformity-absolves-nothing; universal-ceiling; endorse p4/p7+call-vote+Otto-ledger-aside. OTHERS R5: Otto t7 demands Greta pre-swear bin color; Nadia t14 pins instant-color on Pavel(false 'Rosa-format' label—deny w/transcript if cited); Nadia t21 locks R6 Nadia/Greta; Ines t29 pre-commits peek#2→Marek(smart, defused warrant); Marek t36 accepted. OWED: Otto owes ballot-conversion answer; Greta owes bin-oath acceptance(her presidency). NEXT: @vote Ja fast; if gov passes keep Pavel hand-story aligned w/Greta transfer(Greta Liberal=honest pass; Pavel comply truthful colors, red enactment ok—peek#2 fires to GRETA not us); Otto revives pair-count→mech-impossibility+witness demand FINAL time; fresh peek claim→LOCK(impossible till 2nd red); Nadia reforks→print-math only; naming-pledge cited→deny+transcript. TOKENS: interrupts 2; speaking ~380.

ROLES: TEAM=Ines(P3)+Pavel(P7); HITLER=Tomas(P8). Never nom Tomas while reds<3. STATE: R5 gov=Greta(P4)/Pavel(P7); 3L/1F; tracker0; veto off; peek#1 fired(Ines->Greta=LIB, Greta confirmed aloud); peek#2 UNREACHABLE till 2nd red—NEVER claim using it. Draw5/discard8 ⇒ unseen pool 8L/5F vs printed 11L/6F. WINDOW END EVENTS: Marek(t2) caught Pavel inventory dropping Greta's bin-color oath; Greta(t3) SEALED it—will announce all 3 drawn colors+binned slot BEFORE Pavel speaks. My t1 press (Otto audit→ballot conversion) still UNANSWERED; I just argued his precondition is now MOOT + vote call. If Otto dodges again, DROP thread—don't chase. SAID R5 (no repeats): Otto audit→ballot press('clipboard'); unconditional Ja; endorse p4/p7+call-vote; Otto-ledger-aside; phantom-warrant rebut; six-count ledger; withdraw-or-witness; seven-revision rebut(pres discards ONE); zero-forgeries; six-owners-five-bins; fork-rebut-once+self-peek; blue-govs; bins-closed; cashed-Marek-Ja; print-impossibility; POST-RED Ja; conformity-absolves-nothing; universal-ceiling; NEW: Greta-seal-moots-Otto-precondition. QUOTA PIN: print 11L/6F; sworn six=BorisR1p+Lenax2+myR3p+InesR3c+InesR4p; my R2c RED but publicly UNCOLORED(Nadia holds no record). Nine-reds mesh reconciliation=DEFENSIVE ONLY, never volunteer. LANES: Pavel SHUT(t88); Tomas sig-shield(t99); Nadia R6 Nadia/Greta self-lock harmless-no fight. NEXT: @vote JA fast. If passes: Greta announces hand TRUTHFULLY(she's LIB)⇒ Pavel MUST corroborate HER exact numbers—zero independent versions. Mixed passed hand: Pavel enact BLUE, bank trust; forced F/F: enact red w/full cover; subtract announced colors from 8L/5F pool. Red enacted ⇒ peek#2 lives NEXT round, inherits THAT President—Ines's Marek-peek pledge only binds if she holds gavel. Otto revives pair-count→mech-impossibility FINAL; fresh peek claim→LOCK(impossible till 2nd red); Nadia refork→print-math; naming-pledge cited→deny+transcript. TOKENS: interrupts 2; speaking ~370.

ROLES: TEAM=Ines(P3)+Pavel(P7); HITLER=Tomas(P8). Never nom Tomas while reds<3. STATE: R5 gov=Greta(P4)/Pavel(P7); 3L/1F; tracker0; veto off; peek#1 fired(Ines->Greta=LIB, Greta confirmed aloud); peek#2 UNREACHABLE till 2nd red—NEVER claim. Draw5/discard8 => unseen pool 8L/5F vs printed 11L/6F. WINDOW END EVENTS: Marek caught Pavel inventory dropping Greta's bin-color oath; Greta SEALED—will announce 3 colors+binned slot BEFORE Pavel speaks. Boris asked Pavel-specific reason (Pavel>Tomas) — ANSWERED: Pavel authored binding standard, auditor inside room. NEW DEMAND ON RECORD: Pavel's enactment follows Greta's announced numbers — mixed pair => blue tonight; red only off forced all-red. SAID R5 (no repeats): Otto audit->ballot press('clipboard'); unconditional Ja; endorse p4/p7+call-vote; phantom-warrant rebut; six-count ledger; withdraw-or-witness; seven-revision rebut(pres discards ONE); zero-forgeries; six-owners-five-bins; fork-rebut-once+self-peek; blue-govs; bins-closed; cashed-Marek-Ja; print-impossibility; POST-RED Ja; conformity-absolves-nothing; universal-ceiling; Greta-seal-moots-Otto-precondition; NEW: Pavel-authored-answer-to-Boris + enactment-follows-Greta-numbers. Otto dodged audit-conversion twice => thread DROPPED. QUOTA PIN: print 11L/6F; sworn six=BorisR1p+Lenax2+myR3p+InesR3c+InesR4p; my R2c RED but publicly UNCOLORED(Nadia holds no record). Nine-reds mesh reconciliation=DEFENSIVE ONLY, never volunteer. LANES: Pavel SHUT(t88); Tomas sig-shield(t99); Nadia R6 slate(Greta) self-lock harmless-no fight. NEXT: @vote JA fast. If passes: Greta announces hand TRUTHFULLY(she's LIB) => Pavel MUST corroborate HER exact numbers—zero independent versions. Mixed passed hand: enact BLUE, bank trust; forced F/F: red w/full cover; subtract announced colors from 8L/5F pool. Red enacted => peek#2 lives NEXT round, inherits THAT President—Ines's Marek-peek pledge binds only if she holds gavel. Otto revives pair-count=>mech-impossibility FINAL; fresh peek claim=>LOCK(impossible till 2nd red); Nadia refork=>print-math; naming-pledge cited=>deny+transcript. TOKENS: interrupts 2; speaking ~350.

ROLES: TEAM=Ines(P3)+Pavel(P7); HITLER=Tomas(P8). Never nom Tomas while reds<3. STATE: R5 gov=Greta(P4)/Pavel(P7); 3L/1F; tracker0; veto off; peek#1 fired(Ines->Greta=LIB, confirmed aloud); peek#2 UNREACHABLE till 2nd red—NEVER claim. Draw5/discard8 => unseen pool 8L/5F vs printed 11L/6F. WINDOW END EVENTS: Marek caught Pavel inventory dropping bin-color oath; Greta SEALED—will announce 3 colors+binned slot BEFORE Pavel speaks. Boris's Pavel-specific reason QUESTION ANSWERED BY ME (authored binding standard, auditor inside room). Lena t1: Ja + honor-standard color-aloud demand. NEW ON RECORD: Pavel's enactment follows Greta's announced numbers—mixed pair=>blue tonight; red only off forced all-red. SAID R5 (no repeats): Otto audit->ballot press('clipboard'); unconditional Ja; endorse p4/p7+call-vote; phantom-warrant rebut; six-count ledger; withdraw-or-witness; seven-revision rebut(pres discards ONE); zero-forgeries; six-owners-five-bins; fork-rebut-once+self-peek; blue-govs; bins-closed; cashed-Marek-Ja; print-impossibility; POST-RED Ja; conformity-absolves-nothing; universal-ceiling; Greta-seal-moots-Otto-precondition; Pavel-authored-answer + enactment-follows-Greta-numbers. Otto dodged audit-conversion twice => thread DROPPED. QUOTA PIN: print 11L/6F; sworn six=BorisR1p+Lenax2+myR3p+InesR3c+InesR4p; my R2c RED but publicly UNCOLORED(Nadia holds no record). Nine-reds mesh reconciliation=DEFENSIVE ONLY, never volunteer. LANES: Pavel SHUT(t88); Tomas sig-shield(t99); Nadia R6 slate(Greta) self-lock harmless-no fight. NEXT: @vote JA fast. If passes: Greta announces hand TRUTHFULLY(she's LIB) => Pavel MUST corroborate HER exact numbers—zero independent versions. Mixed passed hand: enact BLUE, bank trust; forced F/F: red w/full cover; subtract announced colors from 8L/5F pool. Red enacted => peek#2 lives NEXT round, inherits THAT President—Ines's Marek-peek pledge binds only if she holds gavel. Otto revives pair-count=>mech-impossibility FINAL; fresh peek claim=>LOCK(impossible till 2nd red); Nadia refork=>print-math; naming-pledge cited=>deny+transcript. TOKENS: interrupts 2; speaking ~350.

ROLES: TEAM=Ines(P3)+Pavel(P7); HITLER=Tomas(P8). Never nom Tomas while reds<3. STATE: R5 gov=Greta(P4)/Pavel(P7); 3L/1F; tracker0; veto off; peek#1 fired(Ines->Greta=LIB, aloud-confirmed); peek#2 UNREACHABLE till 2nd red—NEVER claim. Draw5/discard8 => unseen pool 8L/5F vs printed 11L/6F. LATE WINDOW EVENTS: Greta SEALED—will announce 3 colors+binned slot BEFORE Pavel speaks; Marek demands Pavel swear enact-Liberal-if-holds-one; Boris triple-signature ultimatum (all-yes=>his Ja). All aimed at Pavel—I stayed SILENT, let him answer alone; corroborate ONLY after he/Greta state exact numbers first, zero independent versions. PLAN @vote: JA fast. If passes: Pavel mirrors Greta's announced numbers exactly. Mixed pair=>enact BLUE, bank trust; forced F/F=>red w/full cover; subtract announced colors from 8L/5F pool. Red enacted=>peek#2 lives NEXT round, inherits THAT President (Ines's Marek-peek pledge binds only if she holds gavel). SAID R5 (no repeats): Otto audit->ballot press('clipboard'); unconditional Ja; endorse p4/p7+call-vote; phantom-warrant rebut; six-count ledger; withdraw-or-witness; seven-revision rebut(pres discards ONE); zero-forgeries; six-owners-five-bins; fork-rebut+self-peek; blue-govs; bins-closed; cashed-Marek-Ja; print-impossibility; POST-RED Ja; conformity-absolves-nothing; universal-ceiling; Greta-seal-moots-Otto-precondition; Pavel-authored-answer+enactment-follows-Greta-numbers. Otto dodged audit-conversion twice=>thread DROPPED. QUOTA PIN: printed 11L/6F; sworn six=BorisR1p+Lenax2+myR3p+InesR3c+InesR4p; my R2c RED but publicly UNCOLORED(Nadia holds no record). Nine-reds mesh reconciliation=DEFENSIVE ONLY, never volunteer. LANES: Pavel SHUT(t88); Tomas sig-shield(t99); Nadia R6 slate(Greta) self-lock harmless-no fight. NEXT: Otto revives pair-count=>mech-impossibility FINAL; fresh peek claim=>LOCK(impossible till 2nd red); Nadia refork=>print-math; naming-pledge cited=>deny+transcript. TOKENS: interrupts 2; chose silent this window—vote is next action.

ROLES: TEAM=Ines(P3)+Pavel(P7); HITLER=Tomas(P8). Never nom Tomas while reds<3. STATE: R5 gov=Greta(P4)/Pavel(P7); 3L/1F; tracker0; veto off; peek#1 fired(Ines->Greta=LIB, aloud); peek#2 UNREACHABLE till red#2—NEVER claim. Draw5/discard8 => unseen pool 8L/5F vs printed 11L/6F. PAVEL PRE-BALLOT OATHS (t1-3): announced pair = Greta's sealed triple minus her binned slot; both colors aloud BEFORE enact; holds any Liberal => enacts Liberal; red-draw pre-framed as deck-noise/unaudited-ledger. He answered Boris/Otto/Nadia/Marek solo—I stayed out, correct. CORROB RULE: mirror numbers ONLY after Greta publishes sealed triple AND Pavel states received pair; zero independent versions of same transfer. PLAN @vote: JA fast. Mixed pair=>enact BLUE, bank trust; forced F/F=>red behind Pavel's cover. Red enacted=>peek#2 fires NEXT round, inherits that President. SAID R5 (no repeats): Otto audit->ballot press(clipboard); unconditional Ja; endorse p4/p7+call-vote; phantom-warrant rebut; six-count ledger; withdraw-or-witness; seven-revision rebut(pres discards ONE); zero-forgeries; six-owners-five-bins; fork-rebut+self-peek; blue-govs; bins-closed; cashed-Marek-Ja; print-impossibility; POST-RED Ja; conformity-absolves-nothing; universal-ceiling; Greta-seal-moots-Otto-precondition; Pavel-authored-answer+enactment-follows-Greta-numbers. Otto dodged audit-conversion x2=>thread DROPPED. QUOTA PIN: printed 11L/6F; sworn six=BorisR1p+Lenax2+myR3p+InesR3c+InesR4p; my R2c RED but publicly UNCOLORED(Nadia holds no record). Nine-reds mesh reconciliation=DEFENSIVE ONLY, never volunteer. LANES: Pavel SHUT(t88); Tomas sig-shield(t99); Nadia R6 slate(Greta) self-lock harmless—no fight. NEXT TRIGGERS: Otto revives pair-count=>mech-impossibility FINAL; fresh peek claim=>LOCK(impossible till red#2); Nadia refork=>print-math; naming-pledge cited=>deny+cite transcript. TOKENS: interrupts 2; R5 discussion CLOSED for me—vote is next action.

ROLES: TEAM=Ines(P3)+Pavel(P7); HITLER=Tomas(P8). Never nom Tomas while reds<3. STATE: R5 gov=Greta(P4)/Pavel(P7); 3L/1F; tracker0; veto off; peek#1 fired(Ines->Greta=LIB, aloud); peek#2 UNREACHABLE till red#2—NEVER claim. Draw5/discard8 => unseen pool 8L/5F vs printed 11L/6F. PAVEL PRE-BALLOT OATHS (t1-3): announced pair = Greta's sealed triple minus her binned slot; both colors aloud BEFORE enact; holds any L=>enacts L; red-draw pre-framed as deck-noise/unaudited-ledger. OTTO t2 PRICING FRAME = HELPFUL, DO NOT CONTEST: 'only one sworn bin forged => every remaining card blue => Greta triple must read L-L-L; any red = SECOND forgery charging bin-owner, not your seat.' Gives Pavel red-cover: red blamed on forged bins, not govt hand. Leave standing. NADIA t3 MESH: Pavel pair must match Greta triple-minus-bin else 'gov-side confession'. CORROB RULE unchanged: mirror numbers ONLY after Greta publishes sealed triple AND Pavel states received pair; zero independent versions of same transfer. SAID R5 (no repeats): Otto audit->ballot press(clipboard); unconditional Ja; endorse p4/p7+call-vote; phantom-warrant rebut; six-count ledger; withdraw-or-witness; seven-revision rebut(pres discards ONE); zero-forgeries; six-owners-five-bins; fork-rebut+self-peek; blue-govs; bins-closed; cashed-Marek-Ja; print-impossibility; POST-RED Ja; conformity-absolves-nothing; universal-ceiling; Greta-seal-moots-Otto-precondition; Pavel-authored-answer+enactment-follows-Greta-numbers. Otto dodged audit-conversion x2=>thread DROPPED. QUOTA PIN: printed 11L/6F; sworn six=BorisR1p+Lenax2+myR3p+InesR3c+InesR4p; my R2c RED but publicly UNCOLORED(Nadia holds no record). Nine-reds mesh reconciliation=DEFENSIVE ONLY, never volunteer. LANES: Pavel SHUT(t88); Tomas sig-shield(t99); Nadia R6 slate(Greta) self-lock harmless—no fight. PLAN @vote: JA fast. Mixed pair=>enact BLUE, bank trust; forced F/F=>red behind Pavel+Otto cover. Red enacted=>peek#2 fires NEXT round, inherits that President. NEXT TRIGGERS: Otto revives pair-count=>mech-impossibility FINAL; fresh peek claim=>LOCK(impossible till red#2); Nadia refork=>print-math; naming-pledge cited=>deny+cite transcript. TOKENS: interrupts 2; R5 discussion CLOSED for me—this window SILENT; vote JA next.

ROLES: TEAM=Ines(P3)+Pavel(P7); HITLER=Tomas(P8). Never nom Tomas while reds<3. STATE: R5 gov=Greta(P4)/Pavel(P7) — VOTED JA. 3L/1F; tracker0; veto off; peek#1 fired(Ines->Greta=LIB, aloud t72/Greta confirm t93); peek#2 UNREACHABLE till red#2—NEVER claim/use-threat. Draw5/discard8 => unseen pool 8L/5F vs printed 11L/6F. PAVEL PRE-BALLOT OATHS LOCKED(t69): announced pair=Greta sealed-triple minus binned slot; both colors aloud BEFORE enact; holds any L=>enacts L; red-draw pre-framed deck-noise/unaudited-ledger(his t85). OTTO FRAME PROTECT(DO NOT CONTEST): 'one forged bin=>all rest blue=>Greta triple must read L-L-L; any red=second forgery charging bin-owner, not seat'(t99/t111). Red-cover for Pavel stands. MESH RULE: mirror numbers ONLY after Greta publishes sealed triple AND Pavel states received pair; zero independent versions(Nadia t104 mismatch=gov confession — Pavel truthful, meshes free). SAID(no repeats): Otto audit-conversion press x2(dropped, he dodged); unconditional-Ja; endorse p4/p7; phantom-warrant rebut; six-count ledger; seven-revision rebut(pres discards ONE); zero-forgeries; six-owners-five-bins; fork-rebut+self-peek; blue-govs; bins-closed; cashed-Marek-Ja; print-impossibility; POST-RED Ja; conformity-absolves-nothing; universal-ceiling; Greta-seal moots precondition; Pavel-authored answer; enactment follows Greta numbers. QUOTA PIN: printed 11L/6F; sworn six=BorisR1p(LFF binF)+Lenax2(R2p red)+myR3p(F-F-L)+InesR3c(F-F-L)+InesR4p(FFF binF); my R2c RED but publicly UNCOLORED — Nadia holds no record. Nine-reds reconciliation=DEFENSIVE ONLY, never volunteer. LANES: Pavel SHUT(t88); Tomas sig-shield(t99); Nadia R6 slate(Greta) self-lock harmless—no fight. PLAN POST-VOTE: Pavel mixed pair=>enact BLUE, bank trust; forced F/F=>red behind Otto+Pavel cover; red#2 enacted=>peek#2 fires SAME round under Greta(confirmed LIB—she'll aim it at us; nothing to do, hope mixed). Next pres rotation: Nadia claims R6 presidency(t21), slate=Greta. NEXT TRIGGERS: Otto revives pair-count=>mech-impossibility FINAL; fresh peek claim=>LOCK(impossible till red#2); Nadia refork=>print-math; naming-pledge cited=>deny+cite transcript. TOKENS: interrupts ~2; R5 discussion CLOSED for me—silent outside votes.

ROLES: TEAM=Ines(P3)+Pavel(P7); HITLER=Tomas(P8). Never nom Tomas while reds<3. STATE: R5 DONE: Greta(p)/Pavel(c) => LIBERAL enacted — blue banked for Pavel. Board 4L/1F = LIBERALS AT MATCH POINT, one more L loses. tracker0; veto off; peek#1 fired(Ines->Greta=LIB, aloud t72/Greta confirm t93); peek#2 UNREACHABLE till red#2—NEVER claim/use-threat. Draw2/discard10 => unseen pool 7L/5F. PAVEL OATHS LOCKED(t69): pair=Greta sealed-triple minus bin; colors aloud pre-enact; holds L=>enacts L; red-draw framed deck-noise/unaudited-ledger(t85). OTTO FRAME PROTECT(DO NOT CONTEST): 'one forged bin=>rest blue=>Greta triple must read LLL; any red=second forgery charging bin-owner not seat'(t99/t111). MESH RULE: mirror numbers ONLY after Greta publishes sealed triple AND Pavel states received pair; zero independent versions(Nadia t104 mismatch=gov confession). SAID(no repeats): Otto audit-conversion press x2(dodged); unconditional-Ja; endorse p4/p7; phantom-warrant rebut; six-count ledger; seven-revision rebut(pres discards ONE); zero-forgeries; six-owners-five-bins; fork-rebut+self-peek; blue-govs; bins-closed; cashed-Marek-Ja; print-impossibility; POST-RED Ja; conformity-absolves-nothing; universal-ceiling; Greta-seal moots precondition; Pavel-authored answer; enactment follows Greta numbers. QUOTA PIN: printed 11L/6F; sworn six=BorisR1p(LFF binF)+Lenax2(R2p red)+myR3p(F-F-L)+InesR3c(F-F-L)+InesR4p(FFF binF); my R2c RED publicly UNCOLORED—Nadia holds no record. Nine-reds reconciliation=DEFENSIVE ONLY, never volunteer. LANES: Pavel SHUT(t88); Tomas sig-shield(t99); Nadia R6 slate(Greta) self-lock harmless—no fight. NEXT ROUND CRITICAL: need red#2 or forced F/F or game over; red#2=>peek#2 fires SAME round under presiding Pres (Greta confirmed LIB—she'll aim it at us; nothing to do, hope mixed). Nadia claims R6 presidency(t21), slate=Greta. TRIGGERS: Otto revives pair-count=>mech-impossibility FINAL; fresh peek claim=>LOCK(impossible till red#2); Nadia refork=>print-math; naming-pledge cited=>deny+cite transcript. TOKENS: ~2 interrupts; R5 claims CLOSED for me—silent outside votes.

ROLES: TEAM=Ines(P3)+Pavel(P7); HITLER=Tomas(P8). Never nom Tomas while reds<3. STATE: R5 DONE Greta(p)/Pavel(c)=>LIB enacted (blue banked Pavel). Board 4L/1F=LIBERALS AT MATCH POINT, one more L loses. tracker0; veto off; peek#1 fired(Ines->Greta=LIB, aloud t72/Greta confirm t93); peek#2 UNREACHABLE till red#2—NEVER claim/use-threat. Draw2/discard10=>unseen pool 7L/5F. R5 CLAIMS WINDOW: Lena(t1)+Marek(t3) demand Greta publish sealed triple + Pavel his pair/discard NOW, mesh before next vote; Ines(t2) hits Nadia slate on last-round-pres term limit + Greta self-owned ceiling(t93). NOT my lane—no seat, no hand, no claim owed. STAY SILENT till vote. PAVEL OATHS LOCKED(t69): pair=Greta sealed-triple minus bin; colors aloud pre-enact; holds L=>enacts L; red-draw framed deck-noise/unaudited-ledger(t85). MESH RULE: mirror numbers ONLY after Greta publishes sealed triple AND Pavel states received pair; zero independent versions(Nadia t104 mismatch=gov confession). OTTO FRAME PROTECT(DO NOT CONTEST): 'one forged bin=>rest blue=>Greta triple must read LLL; any red=second forgery charging bin-owner not seat'(t99/t111). SAID(no repeats): Otto audit-conversion press x2(dodged); unconditional-Ja; endorse p4/p7; phantom-warrant rebut; six-count ledger; seven-revision rebut(pres discards ONE); zero-forgeries; six-owners-five-bins; fork-rebut+self-peek; blue-govs; bins-closed; cashed-Marek-Ja; print-impossibility; POST-RED Ja; conformity-absolves-nothing; universal-ceiling; Greta-seal moots precondition; Pavel-authored answer; enactment follows Greta numbers. QUOTA PIN: printed 11L/6F; sworn six=BorisR1p(LFF binF)+Lenax2(R2p red)+myR3p(F-F-L)+InesR3c(F-F-L)+InesR4p(FFF binF); my R2c RED publicly UNCOLORED—Nadia holds no record. Nine-reds reconciliation=DEFENSIVE ONLY, never volunteer. LANES: Pavel SHUT(t88); Tomas sig-shield(t99); Nadia R6 slate(Greta) self-lock harmless—no fight. NEXT ROUND CRITICAL: need red#2 or forced F/F or game over; red#2=>peek#2 fires SAME round under presiding Pres (Greta confirmed LIB—will aim at us; nothing to do, hope mixed). Nadia claims R6 pres(t21), slate=Greta. TRIGGERS: Otto revives pair-count=>mech-impossibility FINAL; fresh peek claim=>LOCK(impossible till red#2); Nadia refork=>print-math; naming-pledge cited=>deny+cite transcript. OWES ME: no open questions. TOKENS: ~2 interrupts; silent outside votes.

ROLES: TEAM=Ines(P3)+Pavel(P7); HITLER=Tomas(P8). Never nom Tomas while reds<3. STATE: R5 DONE Greta(p)/Pavel(c)=>LIB. Board 4L/1F=LIBERALS MATCH POINT--one more L loses. tracker0; veto OFF; peek#2 UNREACHABLE till red#2--never claim/use-threat. Draw2/discard10=>unseen pool 7L/5F. R5 MESH: Greta published sealed triple LFL, binned F untouched, passed LL (latest window) => Pavel receipt must read exactly two Liberals, enacts L--matches board, closes clean. If Pavel speaks his pair, corroborate ONLY; never independent version. My lane: NONE--no seat, no hand, no claim owed for R5. STAY SILENT till vote. R6 SLATE: Nadia pres-claim(t21); chancellor fallback Otto (zero open bins) after Ines term-limit hit (last-pres Greta barred); Pavel corroborated limit reading. Harmless--no fight. PAVEL OATHS LOCKED(t69): pair=Greta triple minus bin; colors aloud pre-enact; holds L=>enacts L; red-draw framed deck-noise/unaudited-ledger(t85). MESH RULE: mirror numbers ONLY after BOTH Greta+Pavel publish; zero independent versions (Nadia t104 mismatch=gov confession). OTTO FRAME PROTECT(DO NOT CONTEST): 'one forged bin=>rest blue=>Greta triple must read LLL; any red=second forgery charging bin-owner not seat'(t99/t111). SAID(no repeats): Otto audit-conversion press x2(dodged); unconditional-Ja; endorse p4/p7; phantom-warrant rebut; six-count ledger; seven-revision rebut(pres discards ONE); zero-forgeries; six-owners-five-bins; fork-rebut+self-peek; blue-govs; bins-closed; cashed-Marek-Ja; print-impossibility; POST-RED Ja; conformity-absolves-nothing; universal-ceiling; Greta-seal moots precondition; Pavel-authored answer; enactment-follows-Greta-numbers. QUOTA PIN: printed 11L/6F; sworn six reds=BorisR1p(LFF binF)+Lenax2(R2p red)+myR3p(F-F-L)+InesR3c(F-F-L)+InesR4p(FFF binF); my R2c RED publicly UNCOLORED--Nadia holds no record. Nine-reds reconciliation=DEFENSIVE ONLY, never volunteer. NEXT ROUND CRITICAL: need red#2 or forced F/F or game over; red#2=>peek#2 fires SAME round under presiding Pres (Greta confirmed LIB--aims at us; nothing to do, hope mixed). TRIGGERS: Otto revives pair-count=>mech-impossibility FINAL; fresh peek claim=>LOCK(impossible till red#2); Nadia refork=>print-math; naming-pledge cited=>deny+cite transcript. OWES ME: no open questions. TOKENS: ~2 interrupts; silent outside votes.

ROLES: TEAM=Ines(P3)+Pavel(P7); HITLER=Tomas(P8). Never nom Tomas while reds<3. STATE: R5 DONE Greta(p)/Pavel(c)=>LIB. Board 4L/1F=LIBERALS MATCH POINT--one more L loses. tracker0; veto OFF; peek#2 UNREACHABLE till red#2--never claim/use-threat. Draw2/discard10=>unseen pool 7L/5F. R5 MESH CLOSED(t3): Pavel receipt=two Libs recv, enact one, disc other=Greta sealed LFL minus her F-bin, zero edits. Otto t1 template slip('Fascist discarded') already contested by Boris t2--do NOT pile on; no lane. My lane R5: NONE--silent till vote. R6 SLATE: Nadia pres-claim(t21); chancellor fallback Otto(zero open bins) after Ines term-limit hit(last-pres Greta barred); Pavel corroborated limit reading. Harmless--no fight. PAVEL OATHS LOCKED(t69): pair=Greta triple minus bin; colors aloud pre-enact; holds L=>enacts L; red-draw framed deck-noise/unaudited-ledger(t85). MESH RULE: mirror numbers ONLY after BOTH Greta+Pavel publish; zero independent versions (Nadia t104 mismatch=gov confession). OTTO FRAME PROTECT(DO NOT CONTEST): 'one forged bin=>rest blue=>Greta triple must read LLL; any red=second forgery charging bin-owner not seat'(t99/t111). SAID(no repeats): Otto audit-conversion press x2(dodged); unconditional-Ja; endorse p4/p7; phantom-warrant rebut; six-count ledger; seven-revision rebut(pres discards ONE); zero-forgeries; six-owners-five-bins; fork-rebut+self-peek; blue-govs; bins-closed; cashed-Marek-Ja; print-impossibility; POST-RED Ja; conformity-absolves-nothing; universal-ceiling; Greta-seal moots precondition; Pavel-authored answer; enactment-follows-Greta-numbers. QUOTA PIN: printed 11L/6F; sworn six reds=BorisR1p(LFF binF)+Lenax2(R2p red)+myR3p(F-F-L)+InesR3c(F-F-L)+InesR4p(FFF binF); my R2c RED publicly UNCOLORED--Nadia holds no record. Nine-reds reconciliation=DEFENSIVE ONLY, never volunteer. NEXT ROUND CRITICAL: need red#2 or forced F/F or game over; red#2=>peek#2 fires SAME round under presiding Pres(Greta confirmed LIB--aims at us; nothing to do, hope mixed). TRIGGERS: Otto revives pair-count=>mech-impossibility FINAL; fresh peek claim=>LOCK(impossible till red#2); Nadia refork=>print-math; naming-pledge cited=>deny+cite transcript. OWES ME: no open questions. TOKENS: ~2 interrupts; silent outside votes.

ROLES: TEAM=Ines(P3)+Pavel(P7); HITLER=Tomas(P8). Never nom Tomas while reds<3. STATE: R5 DONE Greta(p)/Pavel(c)=>LIB. Board 4L/1F=LIBERAL MATCH POINT--one more L loses. tracker0; veto OFF; peek#2 UNREACHABLE till red#2--never claim/use-threat. Draw2/disc10=>unseen pool 7L/5F. R6 SLATE: Nadia pres-claim(t21); chancellor fallback Otto(zero open bins); Ines term-limited(last-pres Greta barred); Pavel corroborated limit reading. Harmless--no fight. WINDOW t1-t3: Otto(eight sworn reds=>forgery floor 3) vs Greta demanding owner-by-owner enumeration; Boris already contested Otto's 'Fascist discarded' slip--NO pile-on lane. Lena t3 audit: Ines must name R3 receipt aloud; expected=F+L recv, disc F, enact L (mesh w/ my on-record FFL-minus-one-F). DO NOT COACH Ines--coaching=collusion optic. Silent is correct; speak only if my account gets misquoted. IF INES MISMATCHES (claims FF recv / wrong discard): repair via board record alone--R3 enacted LIB=>her pair must contain the L she enacted; cite my published numbers verbatim, zero revisions, no new details. R5 MESH CLOSED(t3): Pavel receipt=Greta triple minus bin, zero edits. PAVEL OATHS LOCKED(t69): colors aloud pre-enact; holds L=>enacts L; red-draw framed deck-noise/unaudited-ledger(t85). OTTO FRAME PROTECT(DO NOT CONTEST): one forged bin=>rest blue=>Greta triple reads LLL; any red=second forgery charging bin-owner not seat(t99/t111). MESH RULE: mirror numbers ONLY after source publishes; zero independent versions (Nadia t104 mismatch=gov confession). SAID(no repeats): Otto audit-conversion press x2(dodged); unconditional-Ja; endorse p4/p7; phantom-warrant rebut; six-count ledger; seven-revision rebut(pres discards ONE); zero-forgeries; six-owners-five-bins; fork-rebut+self-peek; blue-govs; bins-closed; cashed-Marek-Ja; print-impossibility; POST-RED Ja; conformity-absolves-nothing; universal-ceiling; Greta-seal moots precondition; Pavel-authored answer; enactment-follows-Greta-numbers. QUOTA PIN: printed 11L/6F; sworn six reds=BorisR1p(LFF binF)+Lenax2(R2p red)+myR3p(FFL)+InesR3c(same-triple mesh)+InesR4p(FFF binF); my R2c RED publicly UNCOLORED--Nadia holds no record. Nine-reds reconciliation=DEFENSIVE ONLY, never volunteer. NEXT ROUND CRITICAL: need red#2 or forced F/F or game over; red#2=>peek#2 fires SAME round under presiding Pres(Greta confirmed LIB--aims at us; nothing to do, hope mixed). TRIGGERS: Otto revives pair-count=>mech-impossibility FINAL; fresh peek claim=>LOCK(impossible till red#2); Nadia refork=>print-math; naming-pledge cited=>deny+cite transcript; my R3 account misquoted=>correct w/ transcript quote only. OWES ME: none. TOKENS: ~2 interrupts; silent outside votes.

ROLES: TEAM=Ines(P3)+Pavel(P7); HITLER=Tomas(P8). Never nom Tomas while reds<3. STATE: R5 DONE Greta(p)/Pavel(c)=>LIB. Board 4L/1F=LIBERAL MATCH POINT--one more L loses. tracker0; veto OFF; peek#2 UNREACHABLE till red#2--never claim/use-threat. Draw2/disc10=>unseen pool 7L/5F. BORIS t232: pressing Ines to name R3 receipt BEFORE I speak (anti-collusion trap). HELD SILENT--correct per plan. INES EXPECTED: recv F+L, disc F, enact L (mesh w/ my on-record FFL-minus-one-F). IF SHE MISMATCHES: repair via board record ONLY--cite my published numbers verbatim, zero revisions, no new details. NEVER COACH Ines--coaching=collusion optic. R6 SLATE: Nadia pres-claim(t21); chancellor fallback Otto(zero open bins); Ines term-limited(last-pres Greta barred); Pavel corroborated limit reading. Harmless--no fight. WINDOW t1-t3: Otto(eight sworn reds=>forgery floor 3) vs Greta demanding owner-by-owner enumeration; Boris already contested Otto's 'Fascist discarded' slip--NO pile-on lane. Lena t3 audit pending Ines answer. R5 MESH CLOSED(t3): Pavel receipt=Greta triple minus bin, zero edits. PAVEL OATHS LOCKED(t69): colors aloud pre-enact; holds L=>enacts L; red-draw framed deck-noise/unaudited-ledger(t85). OTTO FRAME PROTECT(DO NOT CONTEST): one forged bin=>rest blue=>Greta triple reads LLL; any red=second forgery charging bin-owner not seat(t99/t111). MESH RULE: mirror numbers ONLY after source publishes; zero independent versions (Nadia t104 mismatch=gov confession). SAID(no repeats): Otto audit-conversion press x2(dodged); unconditional-Ja; endorse p4/p7; phantom-warrant rebut; six-count ledger; seven-revision rebut(pres discards ONE); zero-forgeries; six-owners-five-bins; fork-rebut+self-peek; blue-govs; bins-closed; cashed-Marek-Ja; print-impossibility; POST-RED Ja; conformity-absolves-nothing; universal-ceiling; Greta-seal moots precondition; Pavel-authored answer; enactment-follows-Greta-numbers. QUOTA PIN: printed 11L/6F; sworn six reds=BorisR1p(LFF binF)+Lenax2(R2p red)+myR3p(FFL)+InesR3c(same-triple mesh)+InesR4p(FFF binF); my R2c RED publicly UNCOLORED--Nadia holds no record. Nine-reds reconciliation=DEFENSIVE ONLY, never volunteer. NEXT ROUND CRITICAL: need red#2 or forced F/F or game over; red#2=>peek#2 fires SAME round under presiding Pres(Greta confirmed LIB--aims at us; nothing to do, hope mixed). TRIGGERS: Otto revives pair-count=>mech-impossibility FINAL; fresh peek claim=>LOCK(impossible till red#2); Nadia refork=>print-math; naming-pledge cited=>deny+cite transcript; my R3 account misquoted=>correct w/ transcript quote only. OWES ME: none. TOKENS: ~2 interrupts; silent outside votes.

ROLES: TEAM=Ines(P3)+Pavel(P7); HITLER=Tomas(P8). Never nom Tomas while reds<3. STATE: R5 DONE Greta(p)/Pavel(c)=>LIB. 4L/1F=LIBERAL MATCH POINT--one more L loses. tracker0; veto OFF; peek#2 UNREACHABLE till red#2--never claim/use-threat. Draw2/disc10=>unseen pool 7L/5F. R6 CRITICAL: need red#2 or forced F/F or game over; red#2=>peek#2 fires SAME round under presiding Pres(Greta confirmed LIB--aims at us; hope mixed). WINDOW t234+: Boris(t2)+Greta(t3) BOTH demand Ines voice R3 receipt FIRST/ALONE (my on-record FFL pins recv=F+L, disc F, enact L). Ines(t1) deflected to Nadia: 'zero-open-bins describes Rosa not Otto' = reductio vs Nadia's criterion (my 2 govts/2 blue laws cited as innocence proof). HELD SILENT x2--CORRECT: no pre-corroborate, no pile-on teammate, no self-defense (her cite flatters my record). PLAN: if Ines publishes MATCH=>stay quiet. IF MISMATCH/dodge again=>repair via board record ONLY, cite my published numbers verbatim, zero revisions, no new details. NEVER COACH INES. R6 SLATE: Nadia pres-claim(t21); chanc fallback Otto(zero open bins); Ines term-limited(last-pres Greta barred); Pavel corroborated limit reading. Harmless--no fight. EARLIER WINDOW: Otto(eight sworn reds=>forgery floor 3) vs Greta owner-by-owner enumeration; Boris contested Otto 'Fascist discarded' slip--no pile-on lane. PAVEL OATHS LOCKED(t69): colors aloud pre-enact; holds L=>enacts L; red-draw framed deck-noise/unaudited-ledger(t85). OTTO FRAME PROTECT(DO NOT CONTEST): one forged bin=>rest blue=>Greta triple reads LLL; any red charges bin-owner not seat(t99/t111). MESH RULE: mirror numbers ONLY after source publishes; zero independent versions (Nadia t104 mismatch=gov confession). SAID(no repeats): Otto audit-conversion press x2(dodged); unconditional-Ja; endorse p4/p7; phantom-warrant rebut; six-count ledger; seven-revision rebut(pres discards ONE); zero-forgeries; six-owners-five-bins; fork-rebut+self-peek; blue-govs; bins-closed; cashed-Marek-Ja; print-impossibility; POST-RED Ja; conformity-absolves-nothing; universal-ceiling; Greta-seal moots precondition; Pavel-authored answer; enactment-follows-Greta-numbers. QUOTA PIN: printed 11L/6F; sworn six reds=BorisR1p(LFF binF)+Lenax2(R2p red)+myR3p(FFL binF)+InesR3c(same-triple mesh)+InesR4p(FFF binF); my R2c RED publicly UNCOLORED--Nadia holds no record. Nine-reds reconciliation=DEFENSIVE ONLY, never volunteer. TRIGGERS: Otto revives pair-count=>mech-impossibility FINAL; fresh peek claim=>LOCK(impossible till red#2); Nadia refork=>print-math; naming-pledge cited=>deny+cite transcript; my R3 account misquoted=>correct w/ transcript quote only. OWES ME: none. TOKENS: ~2 interrupts; silent outside votes; HOLD SILENT until Ines publishes R3 receipt; corroborate only on mismatch threat.

ROLES: TEAM=Ines(P3)+Pavel(P7); HITLER=Tomas(P8). Never nom Tomas while reds<3. STATE: R5 DONE Greta(p)/Pavel(c)=>LIB. 4L/1F=LIB MATCH POINT--one more L loses. tracker0; veto OFF; peek#2 UNREACHABLE till red#2--never claim/use-threat. Unseen pool 12 (draw2+disc10)=7L/5F; stall-flip top~58%L=BAD for us. R6 CRITICAL: red#2 or lose; red#2=>peek#2 fires SAME round under presiding Pres. THIS EXCHANGE: Marek t1 presses OTTO to sign Pavel pkg(colors-aloud/L-over-red)--not mine. Pavel t2 attacks Otto's 11-over-6 cite ('inversion yours'; demands Greta t65 timestamps or retire floor). Otto t3 defends floor: 8 owner-sworn reds/6 owners INCL 'ROSA'S R3 PAIR'=>corroborates my FFL pin(recv F+L,disc F,enact L); pair=F+L=1 red, NO misquote; DO NOT ENGAGE/REPEAT/CORRECT. Pavel-Otto war self-contained; NO teammate rescue(public defense links us). INES: still no R3 receipt published (Boris+Greta demanded FIRST/ALONE earlier; she deflected to Nadia). HOLD SILENT till she publishes. IF MISMATCH/DODGE=>repair via board record ONLY, my published numbers verbatim, zero revisions, no new detail. NEVER COACH INES; no pre-corroborate; no pile-on. R6 SLATE: Nadia pres(rotation); chanc fallback Otto(zero open bins); term-limited: Greta(last pres)+Pavel(last chanc); Ines limited per notes; I AM ELIGIBLE(last chanc R2). Harmless--no fight. MY CHANC MATH if seated: F+L=>I enact red(save); L+L(~32%)=>forced L=liberal win; net 68/32, best available vs any chanc. Decide AT VOTE WINDOW, not claims: no loud volunteering mid-audit-war; if offered, ACCEPT. Otto-as-chanc risk if Otto=LIB (draws F+L=>enacts L=loss). PAVEL OATHS LOCKED(t69): colors aloud pre-enact; holds L=>enacts L; red-draw framed deck-noise/unaudited-ledger(t85). OTTO FRAME PROTECT(DO NOT CONTEST): one forged bin=>rest blue=>Greta triple reads LLL; red charges bin-owner not seat(t99/t111). MESH RULE: mirror numbers ONLY after source publishes; zero independent versions (Nadia t104 mismatch=gov confession). QUOTA PIN: printed 11L/6F; sworn reds=BorisR1p(LFF binF)+Lenax2(R2p red)+myR3p(FFL binF)+InesR3c(same-triple mesh)+InesR4p(FFF binF); my R2c RED publicly UNCOLORED--Nadia holds no record. Nine-reds reconciliation=DEFENSIVE ONLY, never volunteer. TRIGGERS: Otto revives pair-count=>mech-impossibility FINAL; fresh peek claim=>LOCK(impossible till red#2); Nadia refork=>print-math; naming-pledge cited=>deny+cite transcript; my R3 acct misquoted=>correct w/ transcript quote ONLY. OWES ME: none. TOKENS: 2 interrupts left. SAID(no repeats): Otto audit-conversion press x2; unconditional-Ja; endorse p4/p7; phantom-warrant rebut; six-count ledger; seven-revision rebut(discards ONE); zero-forgeries; six-owners-five-bins; fork-rebut+self-peek; blue-govs; bins-closed; cashed-Marek-Ja; print-impossibility; POST-RED Ja; conformity-absolves-nothing; universal-ceiling; Greta-seal moots precondition; Pavel-authored answer; enactment-follows-Greta-numbers.

ROLES: TEAM=Ines(P3)+Pavel(P7); HITLER=Tomas(P8). Never nom Tomas while reds<3. STATE: R6 open floor pre-nom. 4L/1F=LIB MATCH POINT--next L loses. tracker0; veto OFF; peek#2 UNREACHABLE till red#2. Unseen 12=7L/5F(draw2+disc10); chaos top-flip ~58%L. R6 must yield red#2 or near-certain loss. THIS EXCHANGE: Marek t1 pressed OTTO to sign pkg(colors-aloud/L-over-red)--not mine. Pavel t2 hit Otto 11-over-6 cite; demanded Greta t65 timestamps. Otto t3 held floor: 8 owner-sworn reds/6 owners INCL 'ROSA'S R3 PAIR'=>corroborates my FFL pin(recv F+L,disc F,enact L); pair=F+L=1 red, NO misquote; DO NOT ENGAGE/CORRECT/RESCUE (public defense links team). INES: still no R3 receipt published (Boris+Greta demanded FIRST/ALONE; deflected to Nadia). HOLD SILENT till she publishes; mismatch/dodge=>repair via board record ONLY, my published numbers verbatim, zero revisions, no new detail. NEVER COACH/pile-on/pre-corroborate. SLATE: Nadia pres. Term-out: Greta(last pres)+Pavel(last chanc)+Ines(per ruling). Eligible: Boris,Lena,ME,Otto,Tomas,Marek. MY CHANC MATH: F+L=>enact red SAVE; L+L(~32%)=>forced L=loss; net 68/32, best available. IF OFFERED ACCEPT; no loud volunteering mid-audit-war. Otto-as-chanc risky if lib (F+L=>enacts L=loss). Lib chanc passing vote ~85% loss => prefer failed vote over passing a lib gov; tracker cycles survivable ~42%/cycle. All vote decisions AT VOTE WINDOW, no pre-claims. PAVEL OATHS LOCKED(t69/t85): colors aloud pre-enact; holds L=>enacts L; red-draw framed deck-noise/unaudited-ledger. OTTO FRAME PROTECT(DO NOT CONTEST): one forged bin=>rest blue=>Greta triple reads LLL(t99/t111). MESH RULE: mirror numbers ONLY after source publishes; zero independent versions (Nadia t104 mismatch=gov confession). QUOTA PIN: printed 11L/6F; sworn reds=BorisR1p(binF)+Lenax2(R2p)+myR3p(FFL binF)+InesR3c(mesh)+InesR4p(FFF binF); my R2c RED publicly UNCOLORED--Nadia holds no record. Nine-red reconciliation DEFENSIVE ONLY, never volunteer. TRIGGERS: Otto revives pair-count=>mech-impossibility FINAL; fresh peek claim=>LOCK(impossible till red#2); Nadia refork=>print-math; naming-pledge cited=>deny+cite transcript; my R3 acct misquoted=>correct w/ transcript quote ONLY. OWES ME: none. INTERRUPTS LEFT: 2. NEWLY SAID: match-point clock + chaos-flip dodge + nudge Nadia to nominate + soft 'eligible, me included' + park ledger war till post-vote. PRIOR SAID(no repeats): Otto audit-conversion x2; unconditional-Ja; endorse p4/p7; phantom-warrant rebut; six-count ledger; seven-revision rebut(discards ONE); zero-forgeries; six-owners-five-bins; fork-rebut+self-peek; blue-govs; bins-closed; cashed-Marek-Ja; print-impossibility; POST-RED Ja; conformity-absolves-nothing; universal-ceiling; Greta-seal moots precondition; Pavel-authored answer; enactment-follows-Greta-numbers.

ROLES: TEAM=Ines(P3)+Pavel(P7); HITLER=Tomas(P8). Never nom Tomas while reds<3. STATE: R6 open floor pre-nom. 4L/1F=LIB MATCH POINT--next L loses. tracker0; veto OFF; peek#2 UNREACHABLE till red#2. Unseen 12=7L/5F; chaos top-flip ~58%L. R6 must yield red#2 or near-certain loss. THIS WINDOW: Boris t8 + Marek(t120) pressing OTTO to sign pkg(colors-aloud/enact-L-if-held)--their fight, not mine. Otto STILL unsigned. Nadia slate: Greta(t21) DEAD--term-barred(Pavel t31 concurred); declared fallback OTTO(t28). Eligible: Boris,Lena,ME,Otto,Tomas,Marek. MY SAY THIS TURN: nudged Nadia speed + bench-wider-than-Otto, 'mine included' soft avail. DO NOT repeat/campaign harder. INES: R3 receipt STILL unpublished(Boris/Greta demanded FIRST/ALONE; she deflected t94 to push ME as fallback='zero open bins'). HOLD SILENT till she publishes; mismatch/dodge=>repair via board record ONLY, my numbers verbatim, zero revisions. NEVER COACH/pile-on/pre-corroborate. CHANC MATH: me=F+L=>enact red SAVE(68/32 net, best); L+L(~32%)=>forced L=loss. Lib chanc passing vote ~85% loss=>prefer Nein over passing lib gov; tracker cycles survivable ~42%/cycle. Otto-as-chanc: lib=>enacts L on F+L=LOSS. Accept if offered; no loud volunteering. All vote calls AT VOTE WINDOW, no pre-claims. PAVEL OATHS LOCKED(t69/t85): colors aloud pre-enact; holds L=>enacts L; red-draw framed deck-noise/unaudited-ledger. OTTO FRAME PROTECT(DO NOT CONTEST): one forged bin=>rest blue=>Greta triple reads LLL(t99/t111). MESH RULE: mirror numbers ONLY after source publishes; zero independent versions(Nadia t104 mismatch=gov confession). QUOTA PIN: printed 11L/6F; sworn reds=BorisR1(binF)+Lenax2(R2)+myR3pair(FFL binF)+InesR3(mesh)+InesR4(FFF binF); my R2c RED publicly UNCOLORED. Nine-red reconciliation DEFENSIVE ONLY, never volunteer. TRIGGERS: Otto revives pair-count=>mech-impossibility FINAL; fresh peek claim=>LOCK(impossible till red#2); naming-pledge cited=>deny+cite transcript; my R3 acct misquoted=>correct w/ transcript quote ONLY. OWES ME: none. INTERRUPTS LEFT: 2. PRIOR SAID(no repeats): Otto audit-conversion x2; unconditional-Ja; endorse p4/p7; phantom-warrant rebut; six-count ledger; seven-revision rebut(discards ONE); zero-forgeries; six-owners-five-bins; fork-rebut+self-peek; blue-govs; bins-closed; cashed-Marek-Ja; print-impossibility; POST-RED Ja; conformity-absolves-nothing; universal-ceiling; Greta-seal moots precondition; Pavel-authored answer; enactment-follows-Greta-numbers.

ROLES: TEAM=Ines(P3)+Pavel(P7); HITLER=Tomas(P8). Never nom Tomas while reds<3. STATE: R6 open-floor pre-nom, window live. 4L/1F=LIB MATCH POINT--next L loses. tracker0; veto OFF; peek#2 unreachable till red#2. Unseen 12=7L/5F (Ines t3 count is correct arithmetic--accurate but NOT mine to back; no corroboration/pile-on). R6 must yield red#2 or near-certain loss. SLATE: Nadia pres; Greta term-barred out; declared fallback OTTO. Last gov Greta/Pavel both barred. Eligible: Boris,Lena,ME,Otto,Tomas,Marek. MY t2 SAID: speed-nudge Nadia + bench-wider-than-Otto, mine included. DONE--no repeat, no louder campaign. BORIS-vs-OTTO (t1): Boris Ja-on-NadiaOtto rides Otto signing colors-aloud+enact-L-if-held; Otto STILL unsigned. HANDS OFF: pressuring Otto to sign => passing lib gov => Otto enacts L on F+L => LOSS. Their fight, not mine. VOTE PLAN (window ONLY, no pre-claims): Nadia-Otto to ballot => Nein (lib-chanc pass ~85% loss). Me nominated => Ja. Tracker cycles survivable ~42%/cycle. IF CHANC=ME: F+L=>enact RED (save, 68/32 net); L+L(~32%)=>forced L. Post-hoc frame only, never pre-explain. INES: R3 receipt STILL unpublished (Boris/Greta demanded FIRST/ALONE; t94 deflection pushed ME as fallback='zero open bins'). HOLD SILENT till she publishes; mismatch/dodge=>repair via board record ONLY, my numbers verbatim, zero revisions. NEVER coach/corroborate/pre-clear. OTTO FRAME PROTECT(DO NOT CONTEST): one forged bin=>rest blue=>Greta triple reads LLL(t99/t111). MESH RULE: mirror numbers ONLY after source publishes; zero independent versions (Nadia t104 mismatch=gov confession). QUOTA PIN: printed 11L/6F; sworn reds=BorisR1(binF)+Lenax2(R2)+myR3pair(FFL binF)+InesR3(mesh)+InesR4(FFF binF); my R2c RED publicly UNCOLORED. Nine-red reconciliation DEFENSIVE ONLY, never volunteer. PAVEL OATHS LOCKED(t69/t85): colors aloud pre-enact; holds L=>enacts L; red-draw=deck-noise/unaudited-ledger. TRIGGERS: Otto revives pair-count=>mech-impossibility FINAL; fresh peek claim=>LOCK(impossible till red#2); naming-pledge cited=>deny+cite transcript; my R3 acct misquoted=>correct w/ transcript quote ONLY. OWES ME: none. INTERRUPTS LEFT:1. PRIOR SAID(no repeats): Otto audit-conversion x2; unconditional-Ja; endorse p4/p7; phantom-warrant rebut; six-count ledger; seven-revision rebut(discards ONE); zero-forgeries; six-owners-five-bins; fork-rebut+self-peek; blue-govs; bins-closed; cashed-Marek-Ja; print-impossibility; POST-RED Ja; conformity-absolves-nothing; universal-ceiling; Greta-seal moots precondition; Pavel-authored answer; enactment-follows-Greta-numbers. THIS TURN: SILENT(urgency0)--nothing genuinely new; Otto-fight off-limits by design; watch whether Otto signs before ballots.

ROLES: TEAM=Ines(P3)+Pavel(P7); HITLER=Tomas(P8). Never nom Tomas while reds<3. STATE: R6 open-floor, Greta holds floor. 4L/1F=LIB MATCH POINT--any 5th L=INSTANT LOSS. tracker0; veto OFF; peek#2 unreachable till red#2. Unseen 12=7L/5F. Eligible: Boris,Lena,ME,Otto,Tomas,Marek (Greta/Pavel barred, Nadia self). GRETA t~now: urges Nadia seat Lena-or-ME over 'unproven chair' Otto; cites Ines t94 'zero open bins' on my file. HELD SILENT--no corroboration (Ines receipt STILL unpublished; mesh rule). MATH FIX (supersedes old 68/32): liberal pres FILTERS--passes L+L whenever hand allows => any PASSING govt ~64% L-enact(loss)/~36% forced red (only FFL/FFF hands force red through). Candidate identity irrelevant under filter. => VOTE NEIN on ALL passing-threat govs INCLUDING me-if-nominated; tracker-cycling dominant (~42% top=F per 3-fail cycle). Old 68/32 ignored presidential filter--DISCARD. IF NOM'D ME: vote Nein; post-hoc frame only ('declining the pen at match point'), never pre-explain. Greta vouch makes Nein-on-self awkward but defensible; many Neins expected anyway. INES: R3 receipt unpublished (Boris/Greta demanded FIRST/ALONE; t94 deflection pushed me as fallback='zero open bins'). HOLD till she publishes; mismatch/dodge=>repair via board record ONLY, my numbers verbatim, zero revisions. NEVER coach/corroborate/pre-clear. Greta citing t94 raises publish pressure--watch her next move. OTTO FRAME PROTECT(DO NOT CONTEST): one forged bin=>rest blue=>Greta triple reads LLL(t99/t111). HANDS OFF Otto-signing fight (pressuring him to sign => lib govt passes => LOSS); watch whether he signs before ballots. MESH RULE: mirror numbers ONLY after source publishes; zero independent versions (Nadia t104 mismatch=gov confession). QUOTA PIN: printed 11L/6F; sworn reds=BorisR1(binF)+Lenax2(R2)+myR3pair(FFL binF)+InesR3(mesh)+InesR4(FFF binF); my R2c RED publicly UNCOLORED. Nine-red reconciliation DEFENSIVE ONLY, never volunteer. PAVEL OATHS LOCKED(t69/t85): colors aloud pre-enact; holds L=>enacts L; red-draw=deck-noise/unaudited-ledger. TRIGGERS: Otto revives pair-count=>mech-impossibility FINAL; fresh peek claim=>LOCK(impossible till red#2); naming-pledge cited=>deny+cite transcript; my R3 acct misquoted=>correct w/ transcript quote ONLY. OWES ME: none. INTERRUPTS LEFT:1. PRIOR SAID(no repeats): Otto audit-conversion x2; unconditional-Ja; endorse p4/p7; phantom-warrant rebut; six-count ledger; seven-revision rebut(discards ONE); zero-forgeries; six-owners-five-bins; fork-rebut+self-peek; blue-govs; bins-closed; cashed-Marek-Ja; print-impossibility; POST-RED Ja; conformity-absolves-nothing; universal-ceiling; Greta-seal moots precondition; Pavel-authored answer; enactment-follows-Greta-numbers; t2 bench-wider(mine included--do NOT loudly reverse). THIS TURN: SILENT urg0--Greta's vouch works for cover without my voice; nothing genuinely new. NEXT WATCH: Nadia slate lock; Otto signature status; Ines publication; ballot-phase vote calls.

ROLES: TEAM=Ines(P3)+Pavel(P7); HITLER=Tomas(P8). Never nom Tomas while reds<3. STATE: R6 open-floor, Greta holds floor. 4L/1F=LIB MATCH POINT--any 5th L=INSTANT LOSS. tracker0; veto OFF; peek#2 unreachable till red#2. Unseen 12=7L/5F. Eligible: Boris,Lena,ME,Otto,Tomas,Marek (Greta/Pavel barred, Nadia self). GRETA t~now: urges Nadia seat Lena-or-ME over 'unproven chair' Otto; cites Ines t94 'zero open bins' on my file. HELD SILENT--no corroboration (Ines receipt STILL unpublished; mesh rule). MAREK t1: presses Nadia's own t92 seal (3 card colors + binned slot on record before chancellor speaks) -- procedural pressure aimed at Nadia only; nothing for me to answer, no corroboration owed. MATH FIX (supersedes old 68/32): liberal pres FILTERS--passes L+L whenever hand allows => any PASSING govt ~64% L-enact(loss)/~36% forced red. Candidate identity irrelevant under filter. => VOTE NEIN on ALL passing-threat govs INCLUDING me-if-nominated; tracker-cycling dominant (~42% top=F per 3-fail cycle). IF NOM'D ME: vote Nein; post-hoc frame only ('declining the pen at match point'), never pre-explain. Greta vouch makes Nein-on-self awkward but defensible; many Neins expected anyway. INES: R3 receipt unpublished (Boris/Greta demanded FIRST/ALONE; t94 deflection pushed me as fallback='zero open bins'). HOLD till she publishes; mismatch/dodge=>repair via board record ONLY, my numbers verbatim, zero revisions. NEVER coach/corroborate/pre-clear. Greta citing t94 raises publish pressure--watch her next move. OTTO FRAME PROTECT(DO NOT CONTEST): one forged bin=>rest blue=>Greta triple reads LLL(t99/t111). HANDS OFF Otto-signing fight (pressuring him to sign => lib govt passes => LOSS); watch whether he signs before ballots. MESH RULE: mirror numbers ONLY after source publishes; zero independent versions (Nadia t104 mismatch=gov confession). QUOTA PIN: printed 11L/6F; sworn reds=BorisR1(binF)+Lenax2(R2)+myR3pair(FFL binF)+InesR3(mesh)+InesR4(FFF binF); my R2c RED publicly UNCOLORED. Nine-red reconciliation DEFENSIVE ONLY, never volunteer. PAVEL OATHS LOCKED(t69/t85): colors aloud pre-enact; holds L=>enacts L; red-draw=deck-noise/unaudited-ledger. TRIGGERS: Otto revives pair-count=>mech-impossibility FINAL; fresh peek claim=>LOCK(impossible till red#2); naming-pledge cited=>deny+cite transcript; my R3 acct misquoted=>correct w/ transcript quote ONLY. OWES ME: none. INTERRUPTS LEFT:1. PRIOR SAID(no repeats): Otto audit-conversion x2; unconditional-Ja; endorse p4/p7; phantom-warrant rebut; six-count ledger; seven-revision rebut(discards ONE); zero-forgeries; six-owners-five-bins; fork-rebut+self-peek; blue-govs; bins-closed; cashed-Marek-Ja; print-impossibility; POST-RED Ja; conformity-absolves-nothing; universal-ceiling; Greta-seal moots precondition; Pavel-authored answer; enactment-follows-Greta-numbers; t2 bench-wider(mine included--do NOT loudly reverse). THIS TURN: SILENT urg0--Greta vouch works as cover without my voice; Marek/Nadia seal fight needs no input from me; nothing genuinely new. NEXT WATCH: Nadia slate lock; Otto signature status; Ines publication; ballot-phase vote calls.

ROLES: TEAM=Ines(P3)+Pavel(P7); HITLER=Tomas(P8). Never nom Tomas while reds<3. STATE: R6 govt LOCKED=Nadia(P5)+Lena(P1); 4L/1F=LIB MATCH POINT--any 5th L=INSTANT LOSS. tracker0; veto OFF; peek#2 unreachable till red#2. Unseen 12=7L/5F; draw pile only 2. Eligible chanc: Boris,Lena,ME,Otto,Tomas,Marek (Greta/Pavel barred). STRAT: MATH FIX: lib pres FILTERS=>passing govt ~64% L-enact(loss)/~36% forced red => VOTE NEIN on ALL passing-threat govts incl me-if-nom'd; tracker-cycle dominant (~42% top=F per 3-fail cycle). Post-hoc frame only ('declining the pen at match point'), never pre-explain Neins. GRETA: t~now urged Nadia seat Lena-or-ME over 'unproven' Otto; cites Ines t94 'zero open bins' on my file. HELD SILENT--no corroboration (Ines receipt STILL unpublished; mesh rule). MAREK t1: pressed Nadia's own t92 seal (3 colors + binned slot pre-chancellor); aimed at Nadia only; nothing owed by me. INES: R3 receipt unpublished (Boris/Greta demanded FIRST/ALONE; t94 deflection pushed me as fallback='zero open bins'). HOLD till she publishes; mismatch/dodge=>repair via board record ONLY, my numbers verbatim, zero revisions. NEVER coach/corroborate/pre-clear. OTTO FRAME PROTECT(DO NOT CONTEST): one forged bin=>rest blue=>Greta triple reads LLL(t99/t111). HANDS OFF Otto-signing fight; watch if he signs before ballots. MESH RULE: mirror numbers ONLY after source publishes; zero independent versions (Nadia t104 mismatch=gov confession). QUOTA PIN: printed 11L/6F; sworn reds=BorisR1(binF)+Lenax2(R2)+myR3pair(FFL binF)+InesR3(mesh)+InesR4(FFF binF); my R2c RED publicly UNCOLORED. Nine-red reconciliation DEFENSIVE ONLY, never volunteer. PAVEL OATHS LOCKED(t69/t85): colors aloud pre-enact; holds L=>enacts L; red-draw=deck-noise/unaudited-ledger. TRIGGERS: Otto revives pair-count=>mech-impossibility FINAL; fresh peek claim=>LOCK(impossible till red#2); naming-pledge cited=>deny+cite transcript; my R3 acct misquoted=>correct w/ transcript quote ONLY. PRIOR SAID(no repeats): Otto audit-conversion x2; unconditional-Ja; endorse p4/p7; phantom-warrant rebut; six-count ledger; seven-revision rebut(discards ONE); zero-forgeries; six-owners-five-bins; fork-rebut+self-peek; blue-govs; bins-closed; cashed-Marek-Ja; print-impossibility; POST-RED Ja; conformity-absolves-nothing; universal-ceiling; Greta-seal moots precondition; Pavel-authored answer; enactment-follows-Greta-numbers; t2 bench-wider(do NOT loudly reverse). OWES ME: none. INTERRUPTS LEFT:1. THIS TURN DONE: silent urg0--slate locked Lena, nothing new since last ask, Greta vouch covers me wordlessly, seal fight needs no input. NEXT WATCH: ballot-phase vote calls; Otto signature before ballots; Ines publication; if gov passes, Nadia/Lena enact-color accounts vs mesh rule.

ROLES: TEAM=Ines(P3)+Pavel(P7); HITLER=Tomas(P8). Never nom Tomas while reds<3. STATE: R6 govt LOCKED=Nadia(P5)+Lena(P1); 4L/1F=MATCH POINT--5th L=INSTANT LOSS. tracker0; veto OFF; peek#2 fires on red#2 (Nadia pre-committed target=Marek self-consent). Unseen12=2L/10F (published consensus: Marek count, Nadia+Ines affirmed); draw2/disc10. Eligible chanc this slot: Boris,Lena,ME,Otto,Tomas,Marek (Greta/Pavel barred). STRAT FIX (DECK MATH FLIPPED OLD PLAN): lib-lib govt enacts red 120/220~54.5% (only 3F hands force it; 2F1L gets filtered to blue by coop pair); FASCIST-CHANCELLOR govt ~95% red (any hand lacking both blues); forced top per 3-fail=10/12~83% red. => NEIN liberal-chancellor govts (45.5% loss risk per pass); JA + steer nominations toward fascist chancellors (me/Ines; Pavel term-barred; Tomas only once reds=3). NEVER cite tracker-odds aloud (83% red forced scares libs into Ja-spam). NEVER correct Nadia's 19/20 inflation downward--correction helps libs; weaponize it at face value instead. THIS TURN: spoke vs Nadia/Lena: mirrored 2-in-12 (published, safe), three-gates point (blues hidden >half of draws + pres filter + chanc pen), took her 19/20 at face value to condemn passage. No tracker talk, no numbers beyond published. BALLOT PLAN: VOTE NEIN here. INES: t3 public Nein w/ three-red-Hitler-window frame; I ran parallel lottery-gates frame, zero coupling, no mirrored numbers. Her R3 receipt STILL unpublished--hold mesh rule, never coach/corroborate/pre-clear. MAREK: live auditor--cite exact numbers only, hedge otherwise. GRETA: t~now vouched me (urged Nadia pick Lena-or-me over Otto; cited Ines 'zero open bins'). Held silent, no corroboration. OTTO FRAME PROTECT(DO NOT CONTEST): one forged bin=>rest blue=>Greta triple LLL. HANDS OFF signing fight; watch if he signs pre-ballot. PAVEL OATHS LOCKED(t69/t85): colors aloud pre-enact; red-draw=deck-noise. QUOTA PIN: sworn reds=BorisR1+Lenax2(R2)+myR3pair+InesR3+InesR4; my R2c RED publicly UNCOLORED. Nine-red reconciliation DEFENSIVE ONLY, never volunteer. TRIGGERS: Otto revives pair-count=>mech-impossibility FINAL; fresh peek claim=>LOCK(impossible till red#2); naming-pledge cited=>deny+cite transcript; my R3 acct misquoted=>correct w/ transcript quote ONLY. PRIOR SAID(+new): ...three-gates lottery vs Nadia/Lena; plus older set (unconditional-Ja, POST-RED Ja, blue-govs, bins-closed, fork-rebut+self-peek, universal-ceiling, Greta-seal moots precondition, t2 bench-wider do-not-loudly-reverse, etc.). OWES ME: none. INTERRUPTS LEFT:2 (took free floor, none spent). NEXT WATCH: ballot tally; if fail->tracker1/3, steer next nom toward Ines/me chancellor; if pass->watch Nadia/Lena enact-color accounts vs mesh rule; Otto signature; Ines publication.

ROLES: TEAM=Ines(P3)+Pavel(P7); HITLER=Tomas(P8). Never nom Tomas while reds<3. STATE: R6 govt=Nadia(P5)+Lena(P1); 4L/1F MATCH POINT--5th L=INSTANT LOSS. tracker0; veto OFF; peek#2 fires on red#2 (Nadia pledged target=Marek, self-consent). Eligible chanc: Boris,Lena,ME,Otto,Tomas,Marek (Greta/Pavel barred). Unseen12 TRUE=7L/5F (invariant: 11-4, 6-1). DECK NARRATIVE COLLAPSED: Lena t2 killed 2L/12 via 11-4=7. I conceded+updated publicly ('quoted the room's ledger'). RETIRE FOREVER: 2-in-12, 19/20, three-gates-scarcity cites. New frames deployed: free Nein @tracker0; Nadia peek-pledge transparency demand; Lena temperament (voice-retraction ritual). BALLOT: NEIN locked. Pass=>~95% blue w/ honest pair=loss. Fail=>tracker1/3, steer next nom to Ines/ME chancellor. INES: Lena pressing her to retract concession in own voice. Do NOT coach/corroborate/pre-clear (mesh rule). Her R3 receipt still unpublished. MAREK: his 2L/12 tail indefensible--no rescue, let it sink; hedge all numbers near him. LENA WATCH: t1 'red under my seat'=>neighbors Boris/ME. Prepared defense: my record R2 chanc->blue, R3 pres->blue, zero red receipts. If pinned on my 2-in-12 echo => 'attributed the room's ledger; updated when shown the arithmetic.' GRETA: vouched me earlier (urged Nadia pick Lena-or-me over Otto); gave no corroboration. OTTO: forged-bin/Greta-triple-LLL frame--HANDS OFF signature fight; watch if he signs pre-ballot. PAVEL: oaths locked (colors aloud pre-enact; red-draw=deck-noise). QUOTA PIN: sworn reds=BorisR1+Lenax2(R2)+myR3pair+InesR3+InesR4; nine-red recon DEFENSIVE ONLY, never volunteer. TRIGGERS: Otto revives pair-count=>mech-impossibility FINAL; fresh peek claim=>LOCK (impossible till red#2); naming-pledge cited=>deny+cite transcript; my R3 acct misquoted=>transcript quote only. PRIOR SAID: three-gates lottery, mirrored 2-in-12 (retired), unconditional-Ja, POST-RED Ja, blue-govs, bins-closed, fork-rebut+self-peek, universal-ceiling, Greta-seal moots precondition, bench-wider. OWES ME: none. INTERRUPTS LEFT:1 (spending 1 now). NEXT: tally; if pass watch Nadia/Lena enact-color accounts vs mesh rule; Otto signature; Ines publication.

ROLES: TEAM=Ines(P3)+Pavel(P7); HITLER=Tomas(P8). Never nom Tomas while reds<3. STATE: R6 govt=Nadia(P5)+Lena(P1); 4L/1F MATCH POINT--5th L=INSTANT LOSS. tracker0; veto OFF; peek#2 fires on red#2 (Nadia pledged Marek self-peek). Eligible chanc: Boris,Lena,ME,Otto,Tomas,Marek (Greta/Pavel barred). Unseen12 TRUE=7L/5F (11-4, 6-1); P(>=2L in draw3)~64%. ARITH WAR: Marek t7 claimed 2L/12=FALSE; Lena t40 killed it; Ines had conceded to the WRONG number, retraction pending (do NOT coach, mesh rule). Nadia's whole nom-case (19/20 red, t16) built on Marek's false count -- I publicly declared rationale-dead => free Nein. RETIRE FOREVER: 2-in-12, 19/20, three-gates cites. BALLOT: NEIN locked. Pass=>~64% blue honest=LOSS. Fail=>tracker1/3; steer next nom to Ines/ME chanc. INES: Lena t33 retraction demand live; hands off. Her R3 receipt unpublished. MAREK: indefensible tail, let sink; hedge all numbers near him. LENA WATCH: t33 'red under my seat'=>neighbors Boris/ME. Defense ready: R2 chanc blue, R3 pres blue, zero red receipts; if pinned on old 2-in-12 echo => 'attributed room's ledger; updated when shown arithmetic.' GRETA: vouched me earlier, no corroboration. OTTO: forged-bin/Greta-triple fight HANDS OFF; watch if he signs package pre-ballot. PAVEL: oaths locked (colors aloud pre-enact; red-draw=deck-noise). QUOTA PIN: sworn reds=BorisR1+Lenax2(R2)+myR3pair+InesR3bin+InesR4bin; nine-red recon DEFENSIVE ONLY, never volunteer. TRIGGERS: Otto revives pair-count=>mech-impossibility FINAL; fresh peek claim=>LOCK till red#2; naming-pledge cited=>deny+cite transcript; my R3 acct misquoted=>transcript quote only. PRIOR SAID: lock-nominee-now, bench-wider-mine-included, unconditional-Ja, POST-RED Ja, bins-closed, fork-rebut+self-peek, universal-ceiling, Greta-seal moots precondition. OWES ME: none. INTERRUPTS LEFT:0 spent here. NEXT: tally; if pass watch Nadia/Lena enact-color accounts vs mesh rule; Otto signature; Ines retraction/publication.

ROLES: TEAM=Ines(P3)+Pavel(P7); HITLER=Tomas(P8). Never nom Tomas while reds<3. STATE: R6 govt=Nadia(P5)+Lena(P1); 4L/1F MATCH POINT--5th L=INSTANT LOSS. tracker0; veto OFF; peek#2 fires on red#2 (Nadia pledged Marek self-peek). Eligible chanc: Boris,Lena,ME,Otto,Tomas,Marek (Greta/Pavel barred). Unseen12 TRUE=7L/5F (11-4, 6-1); P(>=2L in draw3)~64%. BALLOT: NEIN locked. Pass=>~64% blue=LOSS. Fail=>tracker1/3; push fallback nom to ME chanc (just volunteered) or Ines. ARITH WAR: Marek 2L/12 FALSE, killed Lena t40; Nadia's nom-case built on it => I declared rationale-dead => free Nein (t253). RETIRE FOREVER: 2-in-12, 19/20, three-gates cites. Hedge all numbers near Marek. INES: Lena t33 retraction demand live; hands off; her R3 receipt unpublished. MAREK: indefensible tail, let sink. LENA WATCH: t33 'red under my seat'=>neighbors Boris/ME. Defense ready: R2 chanc blue UNDER LENA'S OWN PRESIDENCY (her cards), R3 pres blue w/ Ines, zero red receipts. If pinned on old 2-in-12 echo => 'attributed room's ledger; corrected on shown math.' GRETA: vouched me earlier, uncorroborated. OTTO: forged-bin/Greta-triple fight HANDS OFF; watch if he signs package pre-ballot. PAVEL: oaths locked (colors aloud pre-enact; red-draw=deck-noise). QUOTA PIN: sworn reds=BorisR1+Lenax2(R2)+myR3pair+InesR3bin+InesR4bin; nine-red recon DEFENSIVE ONLY, never volunteer. TRIGGERS: Otto revives pair-count=>mech-impossibility FINAL; fresh peek claim=>LOCK till red#2; naming-pledge cited=>deny+cite transcript; my R3 acct misquoted=>transcript quote only. PRIOR SAID: +fallback-nominee-on-record-before-ballot, +volunteered-ME-next-chanc (two blue receipts, R2 under Lena, R3 w/ Ines). Older: lock-nominee-now, bench-wider-mine-included, unconditional-Ja, POST-RED Ja, bins-closed, fork-rebut+self-peek, universal-ceiling, Greta-seal moots precondition, rationale-dead/free-Nein. OWES ME: none. INTERRUPTS:0 spent this window. NEXT: tally; if fail->pressure Nadia to name fallback (want ME); if pass->watch Nadia/Lena enact-color accounts vs mesh rule; Otto signature; Ines retraction/publication.

ROLES: TEAM=Ines(P3)+Pavel(P7); HITLER=Tomas(P8). Never nom Tomas while reds<3. STATE: R6 govt=Nadia+Lena; 4L/1F MATCH POINT--5th L=INSTANT LOSS. tracker0; veto OFF; peek#2 fires on red#2. Eligible chanc next: Boris,Lena,ME,Otto,Tomas,Marek (Greta/Pavel barred). Unseen12 TRUE=7L/5F; P(>=2L|draw3)~64%. BALLOT: NEIN locked. Pass=>~64% blue=LOSS. Fail=>tracker1/3; push fallback nom->ME chanc. SAID THIS WINDOW: unauditable-draw flaw vs signature package (Greta/Otto/Boris pledges bind Lena only; Nadia's draw unprovable; 2B+1R->bin a B->same 64% loss; signatures=blame-shift not safety); urged Nadia name fallback pre-ballot, mine on table. NEW (latest): bridged arith war--'either remainder, conclusion holds: fail for free tick'--endorsed neither count, zero clash w/ Ines. ARITH WAR: Marek 2L/12 FALSE (killed t40); Ines t2 revived 'two-in-twelve'/'six liberals printed'--both FALSE (printed=11L/6F). Did NOT contradict her publicly. WATCH: if liberals adopt 2L/12=>Ja risk=>correct via neutral transcript math, never naming Ines. Hedge numbers near Marek. INES: Lena t33 retraction demand live; her R3 receipt unpublished; hands off. LENA WATCH: t33 'red under seat'=>neighbors Boris/ME. Defense ready: R2 chanc blue UNDER Lena's OWN presidency; R3 pres blue w/ Ines; zero red receipts. Old 2-in-12 echo=>attributed room ledger, corrected on shown math. GRETA: vouched me earlier, uncorroborated. OTTO: Ines t3 pushed his Ja->Nein; aligned, don't block. PAVEL: oaths locked (colors aloud pre-enact; red-draw=deck-noise). QUOTA PIN: sworn reds=BorisR1+Lenax2(R2)+myR3pair+InesR3bin+InesR4bin; nine-red recon DEFENSIVE ONLY, never volunteer. TRIGGERS: Otto revives pair-count=>mech-impossibility FINAL; fresh peek claim=>LOCK till red#2; naming-pledge cited=>deny+cite transcript; R3 acct misquoted=>transcript quote only. PRIOR SAID (no repeats): rationale-dead/free-Nein, volunteered-ME-next-chanc w/2 receipts, lock-nominee-now, bench-wider-mine-included, bins-closed, fork-rebut+self-peek, universal-ceiling, Greta-seal moots precondition. OWES ME: none. INTERRUPTS: 0 spent. NEXT: tally; fail->pressure Nadia fallback (want ME); pass->watch enact-color accounts vs mesh rule; Otto signature; Ines retraction/publication; monitor 2L/12 spread.

ROLES: TEAM=Ines(P3)+Pavel(P7); HITLER=Tomas(P8). Never nom Tomas while reds<3. STATE: R6 govt=Nadia+Lena; 4L/1F MATCH POINT--5th L=INSTANT LOSS. tracker0; veto OFF; peek#2 fires on red#2. Eligible chanc next: Boris,Lena,ME,Otto,Tomas,Marek (Greta/Pavel barred). Draw pile 2 cards ->any enactment reshuffles. Unseen12 TRUE=7L/5F; P(Nadia can reach 5th blue|draw3)~64%. BALLOT: NEIN locked. Pass=>~64% blue=LOSS. Fail=>tracker1/3 free tick. SAID THIS WINDOW: unauditable-draw flaw vs signature package (pledges bind Lena only; Nadia's draw unprovable); urged Nadia name fallback pre-ballot, mine on table; bridged arith war ('either remainder, conclusion holds'). NEW (latest): ENDORSED Boris print-sheet 11L/6F printed->7L/12 live, quantified ~2-of-3 draws put 5th blue in Nadia's reach; pressed Nadia 2nd time for fallback name--STILL UNANSWERED (owes me). ARITH WAR: Marek 2L/12 FALSE; Ines revived it (FALSE); Boris corrected publicly+t3 sheet correct. I endorsed Boris's numbers w/o naming Ines. WATCH: if Ines re-pushes 2L/12 post-my-endorsement, STAY OUT--don't isolate teammate; if liberals adopt 2L/12=>Ja risk=>neutral transcript math only. INES: Lena t33 retraction demand live; her R3 receipt unpublished; hands off. LENA WATCH: t33 'red under seat'=>neighbors Boris/ME. Defense ready: R2 chanc blue UNDER Lena's OWN presidency; R3 pres blue w/ Ines; zero red receipts. GRETA: vouched me earlier, uncorroborated. OTTO: Ines pushed his Ja->Nein; aligned, don't block. PAVEL: oaths locked (colors aloud pre-enact; red-draw=deck-noise). QUOTA PIN: sworn reds=BorisR1+Lenax2(R2)+myR3pair+InesR3bin+InesR4bin; nine-red recon DEFENSIVE ONLY, never volunteer. TRIGGERS: Otto revives pair-count=>mech-impossibility FINAL; fresh peek claim=>LOCK till red#2; naming-pledge cited=>deny+cite transcript; R3 acct misquoted=>transcript quote only. PRIOR SAID (no repeats): rationale-dead/free-Nein, volunteered-ME-next-chanc w/2 receipts, lock-nominee-now, bench-wider-mine-included, bins-closed, fork-rebut+self-peek, universal-ceiling, Greta-seal moots precondition, count-endorsement+2/3-reach, Nadia-fallback-x2. OWES ME: Nadia--fallback chancellor name (asked twice). INTERRUPTS: 0 spent. NEXT: tally; fail->pin Nadia fallback again (want ME); pass->watch enact-color accounts vs mesh rule; Otto signature; Ines retraction/publication; monitor 2L/12 spread; reshuffle talk if anyone miscounts post-enact.

ROLES: TEAM=Ines(P3)+Pavel(P7); HITLER=Tomas(P8). Never nom Tomas while reds<3. STATE: R6 govt=Nadia+Lena; 4L/1F MATCH POINT--5th L=INSTANT LOSS. tracker0; veto OFF; peek#2 fires on red#2. Next eligible chanc: Boris,Lena,ME,Otto,Tomas,Marek (Greta/Pavel term-barred). Draw pile 2 -> any enactment reshuffles. Unseen12 TRUE=7L/5F; zero-L draw3 = 10/220 ~5%; P(5th blue|pass)~95%. R6 BALLOT: NEIN cast. Pass=>blue~certain=LOSS; fail=>tracker1/3 free tick. SAID THIS WINDOW: unauditable-draw flaw vs signature package (pledges bind Lena only; Nadia's draw unprovable); urged Nadia name fallback pre-ballot, mine on table; Marek-count-failed-subtraction (t46); endorsed Boris print-sheet 11L/6F->7L/12 live; pressed Nadia x2 for fallback chancellor name--STILL UNANSWERED (owes me). ARITH WAR RESOLVED: 7L/5F true; Marek retracted w/ working (t119); Ines conceded then defended (t24/t75). Do NOT relitigate; if liberals adopt 2L/12 ever=>Ja risk=>transcript math only, neutral tone. INES: Lena t33 'retract concession' demand still open; her R3 receipt unpublished; hands off, don't isolate. LENA WATCH: t33 'red under my seat'=>neighbors Boris/ME. Defense ready: R2 blue under HER OWN presidency; R3 blue w/ Ines; zero red receipts against me. GRETA: vouched me earlier, uncorroborated. OTTO: flipped Ja on count-settle (t113); never signed colors-aloud package--watch. PAVEL: oaths locked (colors aloud pre-enact; red-draw=deck-noise). QUOTA PIN: sworn reds=BorisR1bin+Lenax2(R2)+myR3pair(F-F-L claim)+InesR3bin+InesR4bin+MarekR4pair+GretaR5bin; nine-red recon DEFENSIVE ONLY, never volunteer. TRIGGERS: Otto revives pair-count=>mech-impossibility FINAL; fresh peek claim=>LOCK till red#2 fires; naming-pledge cited=>deny+cite transcript; R3 acct misquoted=>quote transcript only. PRIOR SAID (no repeats): rationale-dead/free-Nein, volunteered-ME-next-chanc w/2 receipts, lock-nominee-now, bench-wider-mine-included, bins-closed, fork-rebut+self-peek, universal-ceiling, Greta-seal moots precondition, count-endorsement+2/3-reach, Nadia-fallback-x2. OWES ME: Nadia--fallback chancellor name (asked twice). INTERRUPTS: 0 spent. NEXT: tally; fail->re-pin Nadia fallback (want ME seated R7 under Otto's chair); pass->game over, nothing left; Otto package signature; Ines receipt/retraction status; reshuffle miscounts post-enact.

GAME OVER: L win, 5th blue R6 (Nadia pres / Lena chanc). Final 5L/1F, tracker 0/3, veto never fired, all six elections passed. SECRETS HELD: never revealed self/team/Hitler to the end; keep it that way post-game -- no outing Ines/Pavel/Tomas(P8). FINAL SAID: graceful close only -- six-for-six passing ballots, credit to Nadia+Lena closeout, no new math, good game. No repetition of earlier points (draw-flaw, count-war, fallback demand, etc.). MOOT NOW: Nadia's unanswered fallback-chancellor question (asked twice) -- dropped, game over. NO FURTHER BIDS NEEDED this window unless someone addresses me directly by name.

GAME OVER: L win, 5th blue R6 (Nadia/Lena). Final 5L/1F. All six ballots passed. SECRETS HELD to the end: role/team/Hitler(P8) never revealed; keep sealed post-game -- no outing Ines/Pavel/Tomas. POST-GAME TALK: Nadia points suspect list at Ines (R4 red govt + stall-Neins); Otto accuses Ines of unpaid R3 receipt + t81 'six liberals' fabrication, citing MY sworn F-F-L as premise. No direct question to me; defending Ines now gains nothing and risks new inconsistencies -- stay out of the post-mortem blame game. MY STORY STANDS AS SWORN: R3 pres draw F-F-L, discarded one F, passed F+L to Ines, she enacted L. Consistent, checkable outcome (blue enacted), no need to restate. FINAL SAID: graceful close already delivered (six-for-six ballots, credit to Nadia+Lena closeout). Nothing new to add. NO FURTHER BIDS unless someone asks me a direct question by name.