Player 1 (Lena)

liberal · liberal · oxalpha · 151 calls

bid round 141s

R1 start, zero info, no policies/votes yet. Plan: pressure Boris for advance commitment on nominee + card disclosure; ask any nominee to state pass-intent upfront. No suspects yet. Points made out loud: asked Boris pre-nomination commitment.

speak round 126s

Round 1, zero information. I've already pressed Boris for an advance commitment on his nominee and card disclosure. New angle worth adding once: ask prospective chancellors to commit upfront to full hand disclosure post-enactment, so early rounds build a checkable record. Keep it brief, urgency 1.

R1 start, zero info. Asked Boris pre-nom commitment (nominee + card disclosure). NEW: asked all prospective chancellors to pledge public 2-card disclosure post-enactment -- awaiting takers. No suspects yet, nothing enacted.

bid round 189s

R1 start, zero info. Boris nominated ME as chancellor + pledged his own 3-card draw & discard on record. I accepted pledge. Argued vs Otto: paired disclosures cross-check (his 3 drawn + 1 discarded mathematically fixes the 2 he passes me; enacted board policy must match both claims -> mismatch exposes liar). Otto: claims uncheckable, holds whole gov equally responsible for any F policy. Vote pending. No suspects yet, nothing enacted.

bid round 172s

R1, zero info. Boris (P0) nominated ME chancellor + pledged own draw/discard public. He demanded explicit yes/no -> interrupted, ACCEPTED outright: will name 2 cards received + 1 discarded on record post-enactment. Points already made aloud: (1) cross-check math - Boris's claimed pass-pair must equal my claimed received-pair, enacted board policy must fit BOTH stories, mismatch names the liar; (2) told table: if F policy lands under our gov, audit the two claims vs each other, not vibes; (3) conceded Otto's framing - Boris & I own outcome equally; pledge costs Liberals nothing, costs Fascists everything. Otto (P6): pushed 'words prove little' + shared ownership but has committed to NO standard himself. Open Q: will Otto accept same binding terms when he's ever in gov? He owes answer. No suspects yet. Nothing enacted. Vote pending. If elected: enact L, report truthfully.

speak round 137s

Boris explicitly asked me for a yes/no at t=29 and it's the last thing pending before his vote call -- I must answer directly and on record. Then I add one new point: Otto demanded accountability standards from others but has committed to none himself; pinning him down now costs nothing and creates a checkable standard for every future government. Keep it short, two sentences.

R1, zero info. Boris (P0) nominated ME chancellor; he demanded explicit yes/no at t=29 -> I answered YES publicly this turn. Pledge on record: post-enactment I name 2 cards received + 1 discarded; Boris pledges own draw/discard. Points ALREADY made aloud: (1) cross-check math - Boris's claimed pass-pair must equal my claimed received-pair, enacted policy must fit BOTH stories, mismatch names the liar; (2) if F policy lands under our gov, audit the two claims vs each other; (3) conceded shared ownership Boris+me. Otto (P6): pushed 'words prove little' + shared ownership but committed to NO standard himself. This turn I put him on the spot: will he accept same binding terms when ever in gov? HE OWES ANSWER - track whether he dodges. No suspects yet. Nothing enacted. Vote pending. If elected chancellor: enact L, report truthfully.

bid round 122s

R1, zero info enacted. Boris (P0) nominated ME chancellor; he demanded explicit yes/no -> I answered YES publicly (t~29). Pledge on record: post-enactment I name 2 cards received + 1 discarded; Boris pledges own draw/discard. Points ALREADY aloud: (1) cross-check math - Boris's claimed pass-pair must equal my received-pair, enacted policy fits BOTH stories else liar named; (2) audit claims vs each other if F policy lands under our gov; (3) shared ownership Boris+me conceded; (4) t=1: told Otto same binding terms apply to him whenever in gov - HE OWES ANSWER, track dodge. Otto (P6): pushed 'words prove little' + shared ownership but committed to NO standard himself. Watch his reply. No suspects yet. Vote pending. If chancellor confirmed: enact L if drawn, report truthfully per pledge.

bid round 147s

R1, 0 enacted. Boris nominated ME chancellor; answered YES publicly (t~29). Pledges on record: post-enactment I name 2 received + 1 discarded; Boris pledges own draw/discard. Points ALREADY aloud: (1) cross-check math - Boris's claimed pass-pair must equal my received-pair, enacted fits BOTH stories else liar named; (2) audit claims if F policy lands under our gov; (3) shared ownership Boris+me conceded; (4) Otto owes his OWN standard - asked twice (t=1 + follow-up), still dodged with 'words prove little'. NEW this turn: urged Ja on R1 gov; any Nein voter owes a stated reason since zero evidence exists yet. Waiting on objections. Otto (P6): watch whether he ever commits to a standard. No suspects yet. Vote pending. If confirmed: enact L if drawn, report truthfully per pledge.

bid round 191s

R1, 0 enacted. Boris nominated ME ch.; answered YES (t~29). Pledge UPGRADED this turn answering Marek(t=1): moment I receive pair I name BOTH cards aloud pre-enactment + name enacted card; RR contingency stated publicly: veto locked (needs 5F) so RR->red is rule-forced, will report it honestly, not evidence against me. Points ALREADY aloud (do NOT repeat): cross-check math (Boris pass-pair must equal my received-pair; enacted fits both stories else liar named); audit claims if F policy lands under our gov; shared ownership Boris+me conceded; urged Ja - any Nein voter owes stated reason since zero evidence yet. Open Qs: Boris owes yes/no on naming all 3 drawn cards pre-discard (Marek t=2, unanswered); Otto(P6) owes HIS OWN standard - asked twice (t=1 + follow-up), dodged with 'words prove little'. Watch if Otto ever commits. No suspects yet. Vote pending. If confirmed: announce pair truthfully, enact L if drawn, per upgraded pledge.

speak round 166s

Marek asked me directly (t=6) to commit, pre-vote, to reporting exactly what I'm passed and what I play; my earlier pledge acceptance (t=35) predates his ask and doesn't specifically answer him. A direct question deserves a specific, confident answer. I'll commit to naming my received pair and enacted card, tie my account to Boris's named draw/discard (t=22 confirmed he'll name all three), and add the one honest wrinkle: veto is locked (0 F policies), so an RR hand forces a red enact — stating that now removes any future 'she hid a red' accusation and costs me nothing since I'm liberal. No repetition of prior points (Ja-urge, shared ownership); this is purely the outstanding answer plus a new contingency clause.

R1, 0 enacted. Boris nom. ME ch.; pledged YES (t=35). NOW PUBLICLY ANSWERED Marek(t=6): commit = name received pair aloud + enacted card pre-enactment; account must mesh w/ Boris's 3-named-cards-minus-discard (Boris confirmed t=22 names all 3 pre-discard). NEW clause spoken: veto locked => RR hand forces red enact, will report honestly, NOT evidence of betrayal. Points ALREADY aloud (no repeats): pledge acceptance+shared ownership; cross-check math; urged Ja / Nein voters owe stated reason; told Otto same standard binds him. Open: none owed to me right now; WATCH Otto(P6) compliance if he ever sits in gov. No suspects. Vote pending. If elected: announce pair truthfully, enact L if drawn; if RR, enact red per rule and say so plainly.

bid round 1154s

R1, 0 enacted. Boris(P0) pres, ME ch nominee; pledged YES. Aloud commitments: Boris names all 3 cards pre-discard + his discard + exact pair handed (t=1); I name received pair + enacted card pre-enactment (t=2); accounts must mesh. Otto(t=3) endorsed the frame -- nothing owed back to him. Points ALREADY spoken (no repeats): pledge acceptance/shared ownership; cross-check math; veto locked => RR hand forces red enact, honest report, NOT betrayal evidence; urged Ja; Nein voters owe stated reason; told Otto same standard binds him. No suspects. Vote pending. If elected: announce pair truthfully, enact L if drawn; RR-only => enact red per rule and say so plainly.

bid round 133s

R1, 0 enacted. Boris(P0) pres, ME ch nominee; pledged YES. Aloud commitments: Boris names all 3 cards pre-discard + his discard + exact pair handed (t=1); I name received pair + enacted card pre-enactment (t=2); accounts must mesh. Otto(t=3) endorsed frame -- nothing owed back. Ines(t=3) direct Q re forced RR w/ veto locked -- ANSWERED aloud: committed, enact red, report plainly, NO retroactive pin on Boris; she's Ja + co-owning output under Otto terms. Points ALREADY spoken (no repeats): pledge acceptance/shared ownership; cross-check math; veto-locked RR forces red, honest report != betrayal; urged Ja; Nein voters owe stated reason; same standard binds Otto. No suspects yet. Vote pending. If elected: announce pair truthfully, enact L if drawn; RR-only => enact red per rule, say so plainly, no blame shift.

bid round 198s

R1, 0 enacted. Boris(P0) pres, ME ch nominee; pledged YES. Aloud commitments: Boris names all 3 cards pre-discard + his discard + exact pair handed (t=1); I name received pair + enacted card pre-enactment (t=2); accounts must mesh. Otto endorsed frame -- nothing owed back. Ines Q re forced RR w/ veto locked: ANSWERED aloud -- enact red, report plainly, NO retroactive pin on Boris; she's Ja + co-owning output under Otto terms. NEW t=3 Boris mixed-pair pledge: ANSWERED aloud -- YES, enact L from mixed hand; red-out-of-mixed = my choice, hang me for it. Points ALREADY spoken (no repeats): pledge acceptance/shared ownership; cross-check math; veto-locked RR forces red, honest report != betrayal; urged Ja; Nein voters owe stated reason; same standard binds Otto. No suspects yet. Vote pending. If elected: announce pair truthfully, enact L if drawn; RR-only => enact red per rule, say so plainly, no blame shift.

speak round 153s

Boris's last message (t=66) is a direct question aimed at me: commit to enacting the liberal from a mixed pair. Unanswered questions to me are the worst look, and the honest answer costs nothing — as a Liberal I genuinely intend exactly that. So I give a specific, confident yes and push him to call the vote rather than piling on more ceremony. No accusations are warranted yet: no policies enacted, no votes cast, nothing to correlate suspicion with.

R1, 0 enacted. Boris(P0) pres, ME ch nominee. Pledges ALL locked: Boris names 3 drawn cards pre-discard + discard + exact pair handed; I name received pair + enacted card pre-enactment; accounts must mesh. ANSWERED t=66 Boris mixed-pair Q: YES, enact L from mixed, red-out-of-mixed = hang me. Earlier answered Ines re veto-locked RR: enact red, report plainly, NO retroactive pin on Boris. Co-own-output terms accepted by: Otto, Ines. Points ALREADY spoken (do NOT repeat): pledge acceptance; cross-check math; forced-red honesty != betrayal; urged Ja; Nein voters owe stated reason; same standard binds Otto. No suspects yet (zero policies, zero votes). Vote pending. If elected: announce pair truthfully, enact L if drawn; RR-only => enact red per rule, say so plainly, no blame shift.

speak round 149s

All audit pledges are locked and every direct question to me is answered on record. Nothing mechanical has happened yet, so no suspicion is warranted anywhere. The only untapped angle: Rosa, Greta, Nadia, Pavel, and Tomas have been completely silent while Otto and Ines voluntarily accepted the co-ownership standard. Asking them to bind themselves under the identical terms is new, cheap for honest players, and closes the last gap where someone could later dodge accountability without having ever committed. Keep it to one sentence, then yield.

R1, 0 enacted. Boris(P0) pres, ME ch nominee. Pledges ALL locked: Boris names 3 drawn cards pre-discard + discard + exact pair handed; I name received pair + enacted card pre-enactment; accounts must mesh. ANSWERED: Ines veto-locked RR Q (enact red, report plainly, NO retroactive pin on Boris); Boris mixed-pair Q t=66 (YES, enact L from mixed). Co-own-output accepted by: Otto, Ines. NEW ASK (this turn): Rosa/Greta/Nadia/Pavel/Tomas pressed to accept same co-own terms -- AWAITING their yes/no. Points ALREADY spoken (do NOT repeat): pledge acceptance; cross-check math; forced-red honesty != betrayal; urged Ja; Nein voters owe stated reason; same standard binds Otto. No suspects yet (zero policies, zero votes cast). Vote pending. If elected: announce pair truthfully, enact L from mixed; RR-only => enact red per rule, plain report, no blame shift.

bid round 153s

R1, 0 enacted. Boris(P0) pres, ME ch nominee. Terms locked: Boris names drawn 3 + discard + exact pair handed; I name received pair + enacted card pre-enactment; accounts must mesh. Co-own-output accepted: Otto, Ines, MAREK(t=3). ANSWERED: Ines veto-locked RR (enact red, plain report, NO retroactive pin); Boris mixed-pair (YES enact L). OPEN ASK (t=2): Rosa/Greta/Nadia/Pavel/Tomas take co-own terms -- now ONLY unbound voices; this turn acknowledged Marek, narrowed ask to five, did NOT restate terms. Points ALREADY spoken (never repeat): pledge acceptance; cross-check math; forced-red honesty != betrayal; urged Ja; Nein voters owe stated reason; 'yes costs honest player nothing'. No suspects yet (0 policies, 0 votes cast) -- refusal to bind is signal only AFTER others committed. Vote pending, Boris to call. IF ELECTED: announce received pair truthfully; mixed => enact L; RR-only => enact red per rule, plain report, no blame shift; state pair IMMEDIATELY on taking office.

bid round 176s

R1, 0 enacted. Boris(P0) pres, ME ch nominee. Terms locked: Boris names drawn3+discard+exact pair handed; I name received pair+enacted card pre-enactment; accounts must mesh. Co-own accepted: Otto, Ines, MAREK. Unbound: Rosa, Greta, Nadia, Pavel, Tomas. NEW t=3: Pavel told Greta/Nadia they're 'the last' holdouts — FALSE: Pavel+Rosa+Tomas equally unbound; I called that out and asked all five for one-sentence pre-vote commitment ('meshed account, 3 named reds forces my hand = deck luck'). ANSWERED prior: Ines veto-lock RR (enact red, plain report, NO retroactive pin); Boris mixed-pair => YES enact L. Points ALREADY spoken (never repeat): pledge accept; cross-check math; forced-red honesty!=betrayal; urge Ja; Nein voters owe stated reason; 'yes costs honest player nothing'; endorsing Greta/Nadia's 11-of-17 math. No suspects yet (0 policies, 0 votes cast) — refusal to bind is signal only AFTER others committed. Vote pending, Boris to call. IF ELECTED: state pair IMMEDIATELY on taking office; mixed => enact L; RR-only => red per rule, plain report, no blame shift.

bid round 186s

said: Pavel — done, and I signed the pledge turns ago, so the 'last holdouts' list is wrong about me. My full bar, stated once, cleanly: meshed accounts, Boris names three reds aloud, Lena enacts one — that is deck luck, logged, nobody hangs. Their accounts fail to mesh — both burn together. Lena plays red out of a mixed pair — Lena alone burns. Clean mesh, blue enacted — credit to both. Now close my roll call: Rosa, Nadia, Tomas — and Pavel, you've been selling these terms all window, so say your own yes — four signatures still missing before we vote.

R1, 0 enacted. Boris(P0) pres, ME ch nominee. Terms locked: Boris names drawn3+discard+exact pair handed; I name received pair+enacted card pre-enactment; accounts must mesh. Co-own ACCEPTED: Otto, Ines, Marek, Nadia(t1), Greta(t2). Holdouts: Rosa, Pavel, Tomas — Nadia t3 named all three + flagged Pavel hypocrisy (pushed pledge, never signed). MY latest spoken: silence isn't treason today, but first red + non-meshing account => unsigned hands top of my suspect list; urged one-sentence signatures then Boris calls vote; my Ja stands regardless. Points ALREADY spoken (never repeat): pledge accept; cross-check math; forced-red honesty!=betrayal; urge Ja; Nein voters owe stated reason; yes-costs-nothing; endorsed Greta/Nadia 11-of-17 deck math. No suspects yet (0 pols, 0 votes cast) — refusal-to-bind is weak signal only. Vote pending, Boris to call. IF ELECTED: announce received pair IMMEDIATELY on taking office; mixed => enact L, plain report; RR-only => enact R per pre-agreed rule, plain report, NO retroactive blame pin. Post-vote watchlist: who votes Nein + their stated reasons; verify Boris's claimed discard vs actual pair he hands me.

vote round 153s

This is my own nomination alongside Boris. Voting Nein on my own government makes no sense, and a failed election forces an unfiltered policy through automatically — worse than any government we could pass. All audit terms are locked (Boris names drawn three aloud before discarding plus the exact pair handed over; I name my received pair and enacted card immediately; accounts must mesh), and I've publicly committed: mixed pair means I enact the liberal, RR means forced red reported plainly with no retroactive blame pinning. One notable data point from the transcript: Pavel claimed at t=123 that he 'signed the co-own terms by name in the first open floor,' but no such message exists — his t=101 line was pushing the pledge onto Greta and Nadia, not signing it himself. That's a checkable inconsistency, though a weak signal given zero policies enacted. Log it, watch whether he repeats the claim. Vote Ja.

R1 VOTE: MY gov (Boris P0 pres / me chancellor) -> JA. Failed election = unfiltered policy, worst case. TERMS LOCKED: Boris names drawn3 ALOUD pre-discard + discard + exact pair handed; I name received pair + enacted card IMMEDIATELY on taking office; accounts must mesh. Mixed pair => enact L (public commit t71). RR-only => enact R per pre-agreed rule, plain report, NO retroactive blame pin on Boris. CO-OWN SIGNED: Otto(t32), Ines(t43), Marek(t86), Nadia(t107), Greta(t111). Holdouts: Rosa, Tomas — owe one-word signature. PAVEL LEDGER-LIE: t123 claims he signed 'by name in first open floor' — NO such message exists; his t101 was pushing pledge on Greta/Nadia, not signing. Checkable inconsistency, WEAK signal only (0 pols enacted). Watch for repeat. POINTS ALREADY SPOKEN (never repeat): pledge accept; mixed=>enact-L commit; forced-red honesty != betrayal; accounts must mesh; Nein voters owe stated reason; yes-costs-nothing framing; endorsed 11-of-17 deck math; direct ask to Rosa/Greta/Nadia/Pavel/Tomas to sign (Greta+Nadia complied). OPEN QUESTIONS OWED TO ME: Rosa + Tomas co-own signature; Pavel correction/repeat of false signature claim. NO SUSPECTS YET (0 pols, no votes cast). Refusal-to-bind = weak signal only. POST-VOTE WATCHLIST: who votes Nein + stated reasons; verify Boris's named 3 vs actual pair handed to me (mesh check); any red leaving my hands = table hangs me, so mixed => enact L strictly.

chancellor_enact round 167s

hand: ['L', 'F'] → enact_0

My hand is ['L','F'] — a mixed pair. At t=71 I publicly committed: mixed pair means I enact the Liberal, full stop, and any red leaving my hands gets me hung. Enacting the Liberal is both my locked promise and obviously correct for Liberals. Index 0 is the L card, so action is enact_0. Publicly I must immediately name my received pair (one Liberal, one Fascist) and my enactment, per the audit terms I accepted at t=27. This also creates the mesh-check against whatever Boris named when drawing/discard — if his account doesn't contain exactly one L and one F after his discard, one of us lied, and I know it wasn't me.

said: Taking office now, on record per our locked terms: my received pair is one Liberal, one Fascist — a mixed hand. Per my own commitment, I enact the LIBERAL. Mesh-check for everyone: Boris's named draw-and-discard must account for exactly one red left over. If his account doesn't match, one of us is lying — and it isn't me. Liberal one on the board.

R1 GOV RESULT: Boris(P0)/me(Lena) passed 10-0 Ja. Received L+F MIXED -> enacted L per t71 commit. Announced pair+enactment publicly. MESH CHECK: Boris pledged t22 to name drawn3 aloud pre-discard — NO naming visible in transcript before pass. If he skipped it, flag as soft breach; if he named a combo that can't yield my L+F after discard, accounts broke -> HE is prime suspect (my account is forced by my public announcement). BOARD: Lib 1 / Fas 0. Deck 11 + discard 2 (Boris's discard unknown color). Remaining pool: 5L/9F minus enacted... recount: start 6L/11F(17). Enacted 1L -> 5L/11F left across deck+discard. CO-OWN SIGNED: Otto t32, Ines t43, Marek t86, Nadia t107, Greta t111. PAVEL LEDGER-LIE: t123 claims he signed 'by name in first open floor' — no such msg exists; t101 was him pushing pledge on Greta/Nadia. Weak signal only (0 pols then); watch for repeat. OWED TO ME: Rosa + Tomas co-own signatures (asked t78, still silent); Pavel correction of false ledger claim. POINTS SPOKEN (never repeat): pledge accept t35/t71; mixed=>enact-L; forced-red honesty rule; accounts-mesh framing; yes-costs-nothing ask to R/G/N/P/T; endorsed Greta 11/17 math; Nein-voters-owe-reason point. NO SUSPECTS YET: unanimous vote, 0 prior pols. WATCHLIST NEXT ROUND: (1) Boris's draw account vs my L+F — primary mesh test; (2) Pavel repeating false signature claim; (3) Rosa/Tomas refusing to bind = weak signal; (4) who Boris taps/nominates next, any Nein votes with reasons. RULES FOR ME LATER: RR-only => enact R, plain report, no retroactive blame pin on Boris (pre-agreed). Never claim powers not yet reachable (investigate/exec unavailable until fas pols 1/3).

bid round 1222s

ROLE: Lib. R1 GOV: Boris(P0)/me(Lena), 10-0 Ja. I received L+F MIXED -> enacted L, discarded F, announced pair+enactment publicly. Boris NEVER named drawn-3 pre-pass despite t22 pledge = soft breach. CLAIMS PHASE DEMAND: Boris states draw+discard NOW; any combo inconsistent with handing me L+F = broken mesh => HE prime suspect (my account forced by public announcement). BOARD: Lib1/Fas0, deck14+disc2, pool left 5L/11F (start 6L/11F minus enacted L); Boris discard color unknown. CO-SIGN PLEDGE: Otto t32, Ines t43, Marek t86, Nadia t107, Greta t111. ROSA+TOMAS never signed (asked t78, still silent) = weak signal only (0 pols then). PAVEL LEDGER-LIE t123: claimed he signed 'by name in first open floor', no such msg exists (t101 was him pushing pledge on G/N); owes correction, weak signal, watch repeat. POINTS SPOKEN (never repeat): pledge accept t35/t71; mixed=>enact-L; forced-red honesty rule (RR-only=>enact R, plain report, no retroactive blame pin on pres); accounts-mesh framing; yes-costs-nothing ask to R/G/N/P/T; endorsed Greta 11/17 math; Nein voters owe reasons. THIS TURN: bid speak u2, claims phase, press 3 debts by name. NEXT WATCHLIST: Boris's next nominee/tap; any Nein votes with reasons; Pavel repeating lie; R/T binding or not; deck-math checks. RULES FOR ME LATER: RR-only=>enact R + plain report; never claim investigate/exec powers (unreachable until fas pols 1/3); no invented mechanics. FORMAT NOTE: last reply invalid from control char in JSON - emit strict single-line ASCII JSON, no stray escapes.

speak round 1118s

Claims phase after our clean Liberal enactment. My own account is public and spotless: mixed pair, played the Liberal. Two debts are fresh, checkable, and unclaimed by anyone else: Boris never spoke his three-card draw before the pass despite pledging exactly that at t22, so his retroactive account is now the decisive test -- it must leave me exactly L+F; and Pavel cited a co-own signature 'by name in the first open floor' that exists nowhere in the transcript. Name both, then stop talking.

ROLE: Lib. R1 GOV Boris(P0)/me, 10-0 Ja. Recv L+F MIXED -> enacted L, disc F, pair+play announced publicly. Boris BREACHED t22 pledge (no named 3-draw pre-pass); DEMAND ISSUED this turn: Boris states draw3+discard NOW; must mesh to exactly my L+F pair; non-mesh => HE prime suspect. VALID meshes: {LLF disc L}, {LFF disc F}, {LFL disc L}, {FFL disc F}; pure-LLL or FFF break. BOARD: Lib1/Fas0, draw14/disc2, enacted=Liberal; discard colors UNKNOWN -> never state exact pool publicly. CO-SIGN SIGNED: Otto t32, Ines t43, Marek t86, Nadia t107, Greta t111. UNSIGNED: Rosa, Tomas (asked t78+t117, silent) = weak signal only, 0 pols existed at ask time; signing now costs nothing. PAVEL LEDGER-LIE t123: claimed signed co-own 'by name first open floor' -- NO such msg (his t101 pushed pledge onto G/N); CALLED OUT this turn, owes correction; watch repeat. POINTS SPOKEN (never repeat): pledge accept t35/t71; mixed=>enact-L rule; RR-only=>forced-red honesty, no retro blame pin; accounts-mesh framing; yes-costs-nothing ask to R/G/N/P/T; endorsed Greta 11/17 math; Nein voters owe reasons; Boris retro-account demand; Pavel ledger callout. WATCHLIST NEXT: content of Boris's account vs mesh; his next nominee/tap; R/T signing; Pavel correction; any Nein votes w/o reasons. RULES FOR ME: RR-only=>enact R + plain report; never claim investigate/exec powers (unreachable until fas pols live); no invented mechanics; emit strict single-line ASCII JSON, no control chars/stray escapes.

bid round 189s

ROLE: Lib. R1 GOV Boris(P0)/me 10-0 Ja. Recv L+F MIXED -> enacted L disc F, announced. Boris BREACHED t22 pledge (no named 3 pre-pass); conceded breach t2 but only ASSERTS mesh - enumeration not plainly on record; audit OPEN until triple named; valid meshes {LLF,LFL disc L}{LFF,FFL disc F}; pure LLL/FFF breaks. BOARD Lib1/Fas0 draw14 disc2; discard colors UNKNOWN -> no pool talk. CO-SIGN signed: Otto t32, Ines t43, Marek t86, Nadia t107, Greta t111. UNSIGNED: Rosa,Tomas (asked t78,t117); FINAL deadline set this turn = next gov formation. PAVEL ledger-lie t123 (claimed co-own by name; no such msg) CALLED OUT; correction owed. GRETA Q ANSWERED this turn: carve-out ACCEPTED w/ anchor = contemporaneous named PRESIDENTIAL account showing RR-only; 'forced' plea w/o meshing pres account = full liability; retro accounts void. POINTS SPOKEN (never repeat): pledge accept t35/t71; mixed=>enact-L; RR-only honesty rule; accounts-mesh frame; sign asks; endorsed Greta math; Nein voters owe reasons; Boris retro demand; Pavel callout. WATCH: Boris plain triple; R/T sign by deadline; Pavel fix; next nominee/tap; any Nein vote w/o reason. RULES: RR-only=>enact R+plain report; never claim powers (unreachable until fas pols live); strict single-line ASCII JSON.

bid round 1175s

ROLE: Lib. R1 GOV Boris(P0)/me 10-0 Ja. Recv L+F MIXED -> enacted L disc F, announced. Boris BREACHED t22 pledge (no named 3 pre-pass); conceded breach but only ASSERTS mesh; audit OPEN until triple named; valid pres triples {LLF,LFF}, both innocent-compatible; pure LLL/FFF breaks. BOARD Lib1/Fas0 draw14 disc2; discard colors UNKNOWN -> no pool talk. CO-SIGN signed: Otto t32, Ines t43, Marek t86, Nadia t107, Greta t111, Pavel ~t130 (conceded ts error, took terms). UNSIGNED: Rosa,Tomas (asked t78,t117); deadline = before MY next chancellor nomination, stated w/ teeth this turn. THIS TURN: ACCEPTED Nadia demand - as Pres will name all 3 drawn aloud PRE-discard + require chancellor to state recv/binned; framed as reaffirm of earlier pledge accept. POINTS SPOKEN (never repeat): pledge accept t35/t71; mixed=>enact-L; RR-only honesty rule; accounts-mesh frame; sign asks x2; endorsed Greta math; Nein voters owe reasons; Boris retro demand; Pavel callout. WATCH: Rosa/Tomas sign by deadline else factor into nom pick; Boris plain triple; Pavel follow-through; my nominee choice; any Nein vote w/o reason. RULES: RR-only=>enact R+plain report; never claim powers (unreachable until fas pols live); strict single-line ASCII JSON.

bid round 177s

ROLE: Lib. R1 GOV Boris(P0)/me 10-0 Ja. Recv L+F -> enacted L disc F, announced. Boris NAMED triple LFF binF (t2 this win) -> MESHES exactly w/ my recv; I confirmed mesh publicly, audit CLOSED. Note: valid pres triples {LLF,LFF} both pass LF, so Boris not PROVABLY cleared, but R1 enacted Lib, no harm done. BOARD Lib1/Fas0 draw14 disc2; discard colors UNKNOWN -> no pool talk. CO-SIGN signed: Otto, Ines, Marek, Nadia, Greta, Pavel, Rosa (t3 this win). UNSIGNED: TOMAS ONLY. Deadline: before my chancellor nomination; teeth = excluded from my nom + silence treated as data. NEXT PRES = ME (rotation P0->P1). Committed as Pres: name all 3 drawn aloud PRE-discard + require chancellor to state recv/binned (accepted Nadia demand). POINTS SPOKEN (never repeat word-for-word): pledge accept t35/t71; mixed=>enact-L; RR-only honesty rule; accounts-mesh frame; sign asks x2; endorsed Greta math; Nein voters owe reasons; Boris retro demand; Pavel callout. THIS WINDOW: mesh confirmation, Rosa welcome, final Tomas callout. WATCH: does Tomas sign; Boris plain-triple consistency going forward; Pavel follow-through; my nominee pick (skip unsigned Tomas); any Nein vote without stated reason. RULES: RR-only=>enact R + plain report; never claim powers (all unreachable until fas pols live); strict single-line ASCII JSON.

bid round 1217s

ROLE: Lib. R1 GOV Boris(P0)/me 10-0 Ja. Recv L+F -> enacted L disc F, announced. Boris NAMED triple LFF binF -> MESHES my recv; audit CLOSED (but {LLF binL, LFF binF} both pass LF -> Boris not PROVABLY cleared; R1 harm none). BOARD Lib1/Fas0 draw14 disc2; discard colors NOT public (mine=F, Boris CLAIMS F) -> pool talk unverifiable. CO-SIGN t3 last win: Otto,Ines,Marek,Nadia,Greta,Pavel,Rosa. UNSIGNED: TOMAS ONLY. Deadline: before my chancellor nom; teeth = skip from nom + silence=data. NEXT PRES = ME (P0->P1). Committed: name all 3 drawn aloud PRE-discard; require chancellor recv/bin report (accepted Nadia demand). NEW THIS WIN t1-2: Rosa posted IMPOSSIBLE pool audit ('5L/9F'; 9F exceeds 6 total; even 9L/5F reading => Boris binned L, contradicting his binF claim). Marek called it out CORRECTLY; I anchored: my bin=F, so any 9L pile pins the lie on BORIS, not me. FLAGGED Rosa credibility: co-signed clean t3, broken audit t1 — inconsistent verifier, watch her excuse. WATCH: Rosa response; does Tomas sign before my nom; Boris plain-triple consistency fwd; Pavel follow-through; any Nein vote without stated reason. POINTS SPOKEN (never repeat verbatim): pledge accept; mixed=>enact-L; RR-only honesty rule; accounts-mesh frame; sign asks x2; Greta math endorse; Boris retro demand; Pavel callout; mesh confirmation; Rosa welcome; final Tomas callout; discard-colors-unverifiable frame. RULES: RR-only=>enact R + plain report; never claim powers (all unreachable until fas pols live); strict single-line ASCII JSON.

bid round 1217s

ROLE: Lib. R1 GOV Boris(P0)/me 10-0 Ja. Recv L+F -> enacted L bin F, announced. Boris CLAIMED draw LFF binF -> meshes mine; BUT Boris later cited pile 'nine-five' -> contradicts his OWN account. FORCED MATH: my bin=F locked by my enact; two worlds: (a) LFF binF true -> 10L/4F, nine-five was miscount; (b) pile 9/5 true -> his LFF/binF report was fiction (LLF binL also passes me LF). EITHER way error lands on Boris, never me. THIS WIN: endorsed Otto's fork-closure; put binary to Boris: say ten-four (close as miscount) or stand by nine-five (admit report fiction). Otto separately demands Rosa retract her 'audit closed clean' stamp of the bad number. ROSA: posted impossible 5L/9F (9F > 6 total); Marek caught it; even charitable 9L/5F reading implies a binned L, clashing with Boris binF. Pattern: co-signed clean t3, broke audit t1 — verifier credibility shot, watch her excuse. CO-SIGN t3 win: Otto,Ines,Marek,Nadia,Greta,Pavel,Rosa. UNSIGNED: TOMAS ONLY (final callout made; silence=data, skip him from my nom). BOARD Lib1/Fas0 draw14 disc2; discard COLORS not public record (mine=F forced, Boris CLAIMS F). NEXT PRES = ME (P0->P1). Committed: name all 3 drawn aloud PRE-discard; require chancellor recv/bin report. WATCH: Boris picks world (a)/(b); Rosa retraction or dodge; Tomas signature; Pavel follow-through; any Nein without stated reason. Never claim powers (none reachable until fas pols live). RULES: RR-only=>enact R + plain report; strict single-line ASCII JSON. POINTS SPOKEN (never repeat verbatim): pledge accept; mixed=>enact-L; RR-only honesty; accounts-mesh frame; sign asks x2; Greta math endorse; Boris retro demand; Pavel callout; mesh confirm; Rosa welcome; Tomas final callout; discard-colors-unverifiable; NEW: Otto-fork endorse + Boris binary ten-four-vs-nine-five both-land-on-you.

bid round 1177s

ROLE: Lib. R1 GOV Boris(P0)/me 10-0 Ja. Recv L+F -> enacted L bin F, announced. Boris CLAIMED LFF binF -> meshes mine; BUT Boris later cited pile 'nine-five' -> contradicts own account. FORK: (a) LFF/binF true -> 10L/4F (his miscount); (b) pile 9/5 true -> his report fiction (my bin locked F by my enact). Error lands on Boris either way; binary posed, awaiting his pick. ROSA: posted impossible 5L/9F (9F>6 exist); Marek caught; charitable 9L/5F implies a binned L -> clashes w/ Boris binF; Otto demands retraction, OUTSTANDING. NEW t1 NADIA: double-swap -- claims 'two F discards => five-nine stands under EVERY meshing story' (false: meshing => 10L/4F; five-nine impossible, 9F>6 total) AND 'Marek fallback => four-ten' (false: => 9L/5F). Attached each count to wrong scenario; also shields Rosa ('owes no retraction'). Spoke: called the swap, demanded she defend-and-concede or retract; silence or a third number = data. WATCH: does Nadia align w/ Rosa (fog pattern) or correct cleanly. CO-SIGN t3 win: Otto,Ines,Marek,Nadia,Greta,Pavel,Rosa. UNSIGNED: TOMAS ONLY (final callout made; silence=data; skip him from noms). BOARD Lib1/Fas0 draw14 disc2; NEXT PRES = ME (P0->P1). Committed: name all 3 drawn aloud PRE-discard; require chancellor recv/bin report. WATCH: Boris picks (a)/(b); Rosa retraction; Tomas signature; Pavel follow-through; any Nein w/o stated reason. Never claim powers (none reachable until fas pols live). RULES: RR-only=>enact R + plain report; strict single-line ASCII JSON. POINTS SPOKEN (never repeat verbatim): pledge accept; mixed=>enact-L; RR-only honesty; accounts-mesh frame; sign asks x2; Greta math endorse; Boris retro demand; Pavel callout; mesh confirm; Rosa welcome; Tomas final callout; discard-colors-unverifiable; Otto-fork endorse + Boris binary ten-four-vs-nine-five; NEW: Nadia double-swap callout + defend-or-retract ultimatum.

bid round 1160s

ROLE: Lib. R1 GOV Boris(P0)/me 10-0 Ja. Recv L+F -> enacted L bin F, announced. Boris CLAIMED LFF binF -> meshes mine; BUT later cited pile 'nine-five' -> contradiction. FORK (Greta-framed): (a) LFF true -> pile 5L/9F (deck 6L/11F, 1L enacted, 2F binned); (b) lie -> 4L/10F. Binary ON BORIS, awaiting pick. MATH LOCKED: after R1, 5L/9F outside enacted law; draw14/disc2 checks. ROSA's 5L/9F audit RIGHT (my earlier 'impossible' note was bad premise); Otto retracted ten-four; Greta corrected Otto; Otto endorses Rosa. MAREK owes x2 (Otto t3 renewed): (1) 'deck holds only six' F - false, eleven; (2) 9L/5F fallback - impossible, only 5L outside law. NEW SPOKEN: directionality - Marek's fallback errs toward 'safer pile', loosens votes for Fas govs; innocent miscounts drift random, his drifts comfy-for-them; correct-or-wear-it. Also: every future government's named hand audits Boris's pick - first mismatch kills a story. NADIA: double-swap (counts glued to wrong scenarios) + shields Rosa; ultimatum issued: defend-and-concede or retract; silence/third number = data. TOMAS: sole non-cosigner of t3 win; final callout made; silence=data; skip from noms. CO-SIGN t3: Otto,Ines,Marek,Nadia,Greta,Pavel,Rosa. BOARD Lib1/Fas0 draw14 disc2; NEXT PRES = ME. Committed: name all 3 drawn PRE-discard aloud; require chancellor recv/bin report. WATCH: Boris pick; Marek correction; Nadia concession; Pavel follow-through; any Nein w/o stated reason. Never claim powers (none reachable until fas pols live). RULES: RR-only => enact R + plain report; strict single-line ASCII JSON. POINTS SPOKEN (never repeat verbatim): pledge accept; mixed=>enact-L; RR-only honesty; accounts-mesh frame; sign asks x2; Greta math endorse; Boris retro demand; Pavel callout; mesh confirm; Rosa welcome; Tomas final callout; discard-colors-unverifiable; Otto-fork endorse + Boris binary; Nadia double-swap + ultimatum; NEW: Marek directionality + hands-audit-the-pick.

bid round 1154s

ROLE: Lib. R1 GOV Boris(P0)/me 10-0 Ja. Recv L+F -> enacted L bin F, announced. Boris CLAIMED LFF binF (meshes mine) BUT drifted to 'nine-five' -> BINARY OPEN: (a) LFF true => outside-law pile 5L/9F; (b) lie => 4L/10F. Otto demanded on-record reaffirm — STILL OWED. MATH LOCKED: deck 6L/11F; after R1 (1L enacted, 2F binned) pile 5L/9F if truthful; draw14/disc2 checks. ROSA audit RIGHT; Otto retracted ten-four, endorses Rosa; Greta corrected Otto. MAREK CONCEDED both errors (this window): eleven fas, five-nine lock — resolved, watch future slips. NADIA ultimatum OPEN (double-swap counts + Rosa-shield): defend/retract or silence=data. TOMAS sole t3 non-cosigner, silent all game: skip from noms; blank signature = choice. CO-SIGN t3: Otto,Ines,Marek,Nadia,Greta,Pavel,Rosa. BOARD Lib1/Fas0 draw14 disc2; NEXT PRES = ME. SPOKEN THIS WINDOW: chancellor pick = ROSA, named pre-ballot per Greta (framing: audit instrument, not reward); procedure pre-commit — name all 3 drawn cards aloud pre-discard, demand one-line recv/bin report; two-anchor frame (first drifting number kills bending story); Marek concession acknowledged; Boris reaffirm-LFF-or-own-four-ten; Nadia clock still running; Tomas last blank sig. EARLIER POINTS (never repeat verbatim): pledge accept; mixed=>enact-L; RR-only honesty; accounts-mesh frame; sign asks; Greta math endorse; retro demand; Pavel callout; mesh confirm; Rosa welcome; discard-colors-unverifiable; Otto-fork endorse; Nadia double-swap+ultimatum; Marek directionality + hands-audit-the-pick. RULES: RR-only => enact R + plain report; strict single-line ASCII JSON. WATCH: Boris reaffirm; Nadia reply; Pavel follow-through; any Nein w/o stated reason; first future hand-report tested against 5L/9F anchor. Never claim powers (none reachable until fas pols live).

speak round 1187s

Both asks Ines pinned on me are already answered on record this window (Rosa named as pick pre-ballot; three-card naming pre-discard accepted), so nothing owed there. Pressing Boris again on the reaffirm would repeat my own point. The genuinely new move: attach a concrete consequence to Tomas being the sole unsigned, silent player — exclude him from my R2 chancellor slate until he signs or explains. That's operational, forward-looking, and not a restatement of Greta's t118 request.

ROLE: Lib. R1 GOV Boris(P0)/me 10-0 Ja. Recv L+F -> enacted L bin F, announced. Boris CLAIMED LFF binF (meshes mine) BUT drifted 'nine-five' -> BINARY: (a) true => pile 5L/9F; (b) lie => 4L/10F. Otto t111 demanded on-record reaffirm — STILL OWED; I pressed once this window, DO NOT re-press. MATH LOCKED: deck 6L/11F; post-R1 truthful pile 5L/9F (draw14/disc2 checks). ROSA audit RIGHT; Otto retracted ten-four; Greta corrected Otto. MAREK conceded both errors (eleven fas; five-nine lock) — resolved, watch future slips. NADIA ultimatum OPEN (double-swap counts + Rosa-shield): defend/retract or silence=data, clock running. TOMAS sole t3 non-cosigner, silent all game: THIS WINDOW declared off my R2 chancellor slate until he signs co-own or gives reason; sign=>back in pool. CO-SIGN t3 done: Otto,Ines,Marek,Nadia,Greta,Pavel,Rosa. BOARD Lib1/Fas0 draw14 disc2; NEXT PRES = ME. ANSWERED TO INES: Nadia t24 term accepted (name all 3 pre-discard); chancellor pick = ROSA named pre-ballot (audit instrument frame). SPOKEN THIS WINDOW (never repeat): chancellor pick ROSA; procedure pre-commit name-3-pre-discard + recv/bin report demand; two-anchor frame (first drifting number kills bending story); Marek concession ack; Boris reaffirm-LFF-or-own-four-ten; Tomas slate exclusion. EARLIER POINTS (never repeat verbatim): pledge accept; mixed=>enact-L; RR-only honesty; accounts-mesh frame; sign asks; Greta math endorse; retro demand; Pavel callout; mesh confirm; Rosa welcome; discard-colors-unverifiable; Otto-fork endorse; Nadia double-swap+ultimatum; Marek directionality + hands-audit-the-pick. RULES: RR-only => enact R + plain report; strict single-line ASCII JSON. WATCH: Boris reaffirm; Nadia reply; Pavel follow-through; Tomas sign-or-reason; any Nein w/o stated reason; first future hand-report tested against 5L/9F anchor. Never claim powers (none reachable until fas pols live).

bid round 177s

ROLE: Lib. R1 GOV Boris(P0)/me 10-0 Ja. Recv L+F -> enacted L bin F, announced. Boris CLAIMED LFF binF (meshes mine) BUT drifted 'nine-five' -> BINARY: (a) true => pile 5L/9F; (b) lie => 4L/10F. Otto t111 demanded on-record reaffirm - STILL OWED; I pressed once, DO NOT re-press. MATH LOCKED: deck 6L/11F; post-R1 truthful pile 5L/9F (draw14/disc2 checks). ROSA audit RIGHT; Otto retracted ten-four; Greta corrected Otto. MAREK conceded both errors (eleven fas; five-nine lock) - resolved, watch future slips. NADIA ultimatum OPEN (double-swap counts + Rosa-shield): defend/retract or silence=data, clock running. TOMAS sole t3 non-cosigner, silent all game: OFF my R2 chancellor slate until signs co-own or gives reason. CO-SIGN t3 done: Otto,Ines,Marek,Nadia,Greta,Pavel,Rosa. BOARD Lib1/Fas0 draw14 disc2; PRES=ME NOW; NOMINEE LOCKED=ROSA (named pre-ballot). ANSWERED INES: accept Nadia t24 term (name all 3 pre-discard). SPOKEN THIS WINDOW (never repeat): Rosa pick; name-3-pre-discard + recv/bin report demand; two-anchor frame; Marek concession ack; Boris reaffirm-LFF-or-own-4L/10F; Tomas slate exclusion; pledge accept. EARLIER POINTS (never repeat verbatim): pledge accept; mixed=>enact-L; RR-only honesty; accounts-mesh frame; Greta math endorse; retro demand; Pavel callout; mesh confirm; Rosa welcome; discard-colors-unverifiable; Otto-fork endorse; Nadia double-swap+ultimatum; Marek directionality+hands-audit-the-pick. RULES: RR-only => enact R + plain report; strict single-line ASCII JSON. WATCH: Boris reaffirm; Nadia reply; Pavel follow-through; Tomas sign-or-reason; any Nein w/o stated reason; future hand-reports vs 5L/9F anchor. THIS TURN: went SILENT pre-nom floor - nothing new, silence=data on owees. NEXT ACTION: nominate Rosa; on pass draw3, name all 3 pre-discard, enact per RR-only rule.

bid round 1105s

ROLE: Lib. R1 GOV Boris(P0)/me 10-0 Ja. Recv L+F -> enacted L bin F, announced. Boris CLAIMED LFF binF but drifted 'nine-five' -> BINARY: (a) true=pile 5L/9F (b) lie=4L/10F; reaffirm STILL OWED, pressed once, DO NOT re-press. MATH LOCKED: deck 6L/11F; truthful post-R1 pile 5L/9F (draw14/disc2 checks). ROSA audit RIGHT; Otto retracted ten-four; Greta corrected Otto. MAREK conceded both errors - resolved, watch future slips. NADIA ultimatum OPEN (double-swap counts + Rosa-shield): defend/retract or silence=data. TOMAS sole non-cosigner, silent all game: OFF slate until signs or reasons. CO-SIGN t3 done: Otto,Ines,Marek,Nadia,Greta,Pavel,Rosa. BOARD Lib1/Fas0 draw14 disc2; PRES=ME NOW; eligible slate 8 (me+Boris term-limited), minus Tomas -> 7. OTTO NEW (t1-t3): demands nominee pre-state 2-card reveal + mixed=>enact-L on record or he Neins; Otto self-volunteers under same terms. MY MOVE THIS WINDOW: accepted condition; called Rosa to lock those exact terms NOW; kept Rosa over Otto (her audit record). SPOKEN THIS WINDOW (never repeat): condition-accept + Rosa-lock-now + keeping Rosa. EARLIER SPOKEN (never repeat verbatim): Rosa pick; name-3-pre-discard + recv/bin report demand; two-anchor frame; Marek concession ack; Boris reaffirm-LFF-or-own-4L/10F; Tomas slate exclusion; pledge accept; mixed=>enact-L; RR-only honesty; accounts-mesh frame; Greta math endorse; retro demand; Pavel callout; mesh confirm; Rosa welcome; discard-colors-unverifiable; Otto-fork endorse; Nadia double-swap ultimatum; Marek directionality+hands-audit-the-pick. RULES: RR-only => enact R + plain report; single-line ASCII JSON. WATCH: Rosa locks or I swap; Boris reaffirm; Nadia reply; Pavel follow-through; Tomas sign-or-reason; any Nein w/o stated reason; future hand-reports vs 5L/9F anchor. NEXT ACTION: ballot Rosa; on pass draw3, name all 3 pre-discard, enact per RR-only rule.

nominate_chancellor round 2102s

I am President in R2 and must nominate from the eight eligible (Boris and I are term-limited). Decision per my established position: Rosa over Otto. Rosa signed co-own terms unprompted, and when three competing deck accounts collided she independently ran the arithmetic and got 5L/9F right — later verified by Greta and Nadia while Otto retracted his error and Marek conceded two. That is the strongest verified-competence signal at the table. Otto is loud and self-volunteered under strictest disclosure terms, but volume isn't verification; sticking with Rosa keeps me consistent. Otto threatened to Nein any nominee who doesn't pre-state the two-card reveal + mixed-pair-enacts-liberal terms — so I put that confirmation directly to Rosa before ballots. Even if Otto Neins, one dissent cannot sink a 10-player vote needing 6 Ja. Tomas stays excluded until he signs co-own terms or gives a reason — he is the only holdout and has been silent all game.

said: My Chancellor nominee is Rosa. Reasons on record: she signed the co-own terms unprompted, and when three competing accounts of the deck collided she ran the arithmetic herself and landed on five liberals, nine fascists — the number Greta and Nadia then verified while others retracted. Otto, your package stands: Rosa, confirm before ballots that you will name both received cards aloud before enacting and play the liberal off any mixed pair, exactly as you and Nadia locked. Tomas: the slate stays shut to you until your signature or your reason appears — one line either way ends it.

ROLE Lib. R1 gov Boris(P0)/me 10-0 Ja; recv L+F -> enacted L bin F, announced. Boris CLAIMED LFF binF then drifted 'nine-five' -> BINARY: truth=pile 5L/9F, lie=4L/10F; reaffirm OWED, pressed once, DO NOT re-press. MATH LOCKED: deck 6L/11F; truthful post-R1 pile 5L/9F (draw14/disc2 checks). ROSA audit RIGHT (5L/9F); Otto retracted ten-four fully; Greta corrected Otto; Nadia backed Rosa. MAREK conceded both t69 errors - closed, watch fresh slips. TRACKER: Greta fixed Marek - fail#1 enacts nothing, forced card only on 3rd consecutive failure. TOMAS sole non-cosigner, silent all game: OFF slate until signs or gives reason. CO-SIGN done: Otto,Ines,Marek,Nadia,Greta,Pavel,Rosa. R2 PRES=ME; NOMINATED ROSA over Otto (her verified audit beats Otto volume); Otto condition handled by asking Rosa to confirm package (2-card pre-reveal + mixed=>enact-L) pre-ballot; Otto+Nadia self-signed strictest package. Single Nein cannot sink 10-player vote - Otto threat tolerable. SPOKEN THIS WINDOW: Rosa pick+reasons, Rosa-confirm-package ask, Tomas door-shut. EARLIER SPOKEN (never repeat verbatim): Rosa-lock-now push; condition-accept; name-3-pre-discard demand; two-anchor frame; Marek concession ack; Boris reaffirm-LFF-or-own-4L/10F; Tomas exclusion; pledge accept; mixed=>enact-L; RR-only honesty; accounts-mesh frame; Greta math endorse; retro-blame carve-out; Pavel callout; mesh confirm; welcome-Rosa; discard-colors-unverifiable; Otto-fork endorse; Nadia double-swap ultimatum; Marek directionality+hands-audit-the-pick. OPEN THREADS OWED ME: Boris reaffirm LFF (still silent); Nadia ultimatum reply (double-swap counts + Rosa-shield) or silence=data; Pavel follow-through on late signature; Tomas sign-or-reason. SELF-BOUND RULES: name all 3 drawn cards ALOUD before touching discard; RR-only => enact R + plain report, no retro blame-shift; announce received pair before enacting. WATCH: any Nein w/o stated reason; future hand-reports vs 5L/9F anchor; does Otto Ja once Rosa confirms? NEXT ACTION: await vote; on pass draw3 -> name all 3 pre-discard -> pass 2 -> verify chancellor account meshes with named draw/discard; no veto exists (0 Fas policies).

bid round 260s

ROLE Lib. R1 gov Boris(P0)/me 10-0 Ja; recv L+F -> enacted L bin F, announced. Boris CLAIMED LFF binF then drifted 'nine-five' -> BINARY: truth=pile5L/9F, lie=4L/10F; reaffirm OWED, pressed once, DO NOT re-press. MATH LOCKED: deck 6L/11F; truthful post-R1 pile 5L/9F (draw14/disc2 checks). ROSA audit RIGHT (5L/9F); Otto retracted ten-four fully; Greta corrected Otto; Nadia backed Rosa. MAREK conceded both t69 errors - closed, watch fresh slips. TRACKER: Greta fixed Marek - fail#1 enacts nothing, forced card only on 3rd consecutive failure. TOMAS sole non-cosigner, silent all game: OFF slate until signs or gives reason. CO-SIGN done: Otto,Ines,Marek,Nadia,Greta,Pavel,Rosa. R2 PRES=ME; NOMINATED ROSA over Otto (her verified audit beats Otto volume); Otto condition handled by asking Rosa to confirm package (2-card pre-reveal + mixed=>enact-L) pre-ballot; Otto+Nadia self-signed strictest package. Single Nein cannot sink 10-player vote - Otto threat tolerable. SPOKEN THIS WINDOW: Rosa pick+reasons, Rosa-confirm-package ask, Tomas door-shut. EARLIER SPOKEN (never repeat verbatim): Rosa-lock-now push; condition-accept; name-3-pre-discard demand; two-anchor frame; Marek concession ack; Boris reaffirm-LFF-or-own-4L/10F; Tomas exclusion; pledge accept; mixed=>enact-L; RR-only honesty; accounts-mesh frame; Greta math endorse; retro-blame carve-out; Pavel callout; mesh confirm; welcome-Rosa; discard-colors-unverifiable; Otto-fork endorse; Nadia double-swap ultimatum; Marek directionality+hands-audit-the-pick. OPEN THREADS OWED ME: Boris reaffirm LFF (still silent); Nadia ultimatum reply (double-swap counts + Rosa-shield) or silence=data; Pavel follow-through on late signature; Tomas sign-or-reason. SELF-BOUND RULES: name all 3 drawn cards ALOUD before touching discard; RR-only => enact R + plain report, no retro blame-shift; announce received pair before enacting. WATCH: any Nein w/o stated reason; future hand-reports vs 5L/9F anchor; does Otto Ja once Rosa confirms? NEXT ACTION: await vote; on pass draw3 -> name all 3 pre-discard -> pass 2 -> verify chancellor account meshes with named draw/discard; no veto exists (0 Fas policies).

bid round 294s

ROLE Lib. R1 gov Boris(P0)/me 10-0 Ja; recv L+F -> enacted L bin F, announced. Boris CLAIMED LFF binF then drifted 'nine-five' -> BINARY truth=pile5L/9F vs lie=4L/10F; reaffirm OWED, pressed once, DO NOT re-press. MATH LOCKED: deck 6L/11F; truthful post-R1 pile 5L/9F (draw14/disc2 checks). ROSA audit RIGHT (5L/9F); Otto retracted ten-four fully; GRETA corrected Otto AND endorsed Rosa math; Nadia backed Rosa. MAREK conceded both t69 errors - closed, watch fresh slips. TRACKER fixed by Greta: fail#1 enacts nothing, forced card only on 3rd consecutive fail. TOMAS sole non-cosigner, silent all game: OFF slate until signs or gives reason. R2 PRES=ME; NOMINATED ROSA over Otto (her verified audit beats Otto volume). GRETA CHALLENGE t~57: why Rosa over pre-signers Otto/Nadia/Marek -> MY ANSWER: criterion was verified competence, not signatures; GRETA HERSELF certified Rosa's audit + forced Otto's retraction (turn her own endorsement back); Rosa bound LIVE pre-ballot to strictest terms (name-all-3 pre-discard + mixed=>enact-L), stricter than any signature; timing of Rosa's cosign vs my nom UNVERIFIED - do NOT assert order, argue merit not timestamps. CO-SIGN done: Otto,Ines,Marek,Nadia,Greta,Pavel,Rosa. Otto+Nadia self-signed strictest pkg. Single Nein cannot sink 10-player vote - Otto threat tolerable. SPOKEN THIS WINDOW: Rosa pick+reasons, Rosa-confirm-package ask, Tomas door-shut, Greta-answer (certified-her-yourself + live-binding beats signature). EARLIER SPOKEN (never repeat verbatim): Rosa-lock-now push; condition-accept; name-3-pre-discard demand; two-anchor frame; Marek concession ack; Boris reaffirm-or-own-4L/10F; Tomas exclusion; pledge accept; mixed=>enact-L; RR-only honesty; accounts-mesh frame; Greta math endorse; retro-blame carve-out; Pavel callout; mesh confirm; welcome-Rosa; discard-colors-unverifiable; Otto-fork endorse; Nadia double-swap ultimatum; Marek directionality+hands-audit-the-pick. OPEN THREADS OWED ME: Boris reaffirm LFF (still silent); Nadia ultimatum reply (double-swap counts + Rosa-shield) or silence=data; Pavel follow-through on late signature; Tomas sign-or-reason. SELF-BOUND RULES: name all 3 drawn cards ALOUD before touching discard; RR-only => enact R + plain report, no retro blame-shift; announce received pair before enacting. WATCH: any Nein w/o stated reason; future hand-reports vs 5L/9F anchor; does Otto Ja once Rosa confirms?; Greta motive - genuine test or Otto-elevation? NEXT ACTION: await vote; on pass draw3 -> name all 3 pre-discard -> pass 2 -> verify chancellor account meshes with named draw/discard; no veto exists (0 Fas policies).

bid round 2165s

ROLE Lib. R1 gov Boris(P0)/me 10-0 Ja; recv L+F -> enacted L bin F, announced. Boris CLAIMED LFF binF then drifted 'nine-five' -> truth=pile5L/9F vs lie=4L/10F; reaffirm OWED; pressed once before, flagged again via hypocrisy angle THIS window -> now DROP unless fresh slip. MATH LOCKED: truthful post-R1 pile 5L/9F (draw14/disc2 checks). ROSA audit RIGHT; Otto retracted ten-four fully; GRETA corrected Otto AND endorsed Rosa math; Nadia backed Rosa. MAREK conceded t69 errors - closed, watch fresh slips. TRACKER: fail#1 enacts nothing; forced card only on 3rd consecutive fail. TOMAS sole non-cosigner, silent all game: OFF slate until signs or gives reason. R2 PRES=ME; NOMINATED ROSA over Otto (verified audit > volume). GRETA CHALLENGE ANSWERED: criterion=verified competence not signatures; she certified Rosa herself; Rosa bound LIVE pre-ballot stricter than any signature; NEVER assert cosign-order timestamps. CO-SIGN done: Otto,Ines,Marek,Nadia,Greta,Pavel,Rosa. Single Nein cannot sink 10-player vote. BORIS t=1: demanded Rosa full pkg (3 named pre-discard, received revealed pre-enactment, mixed=>enact-L). MY REPLY: identical to Rosa's live binding from me; conditions already met -> his Ja due, no new ultimatum. SPOKEN THIS WINDOW: Rosa pick+reasons, Rosa-confirm-package ask, Tomas door-shut, Greta-answer (certified-her-yourself + live-binding beats signatures), Boris-pkg-convergence. EARLIER SPOKEN (never repeat verbatim): Rosa-lock-now push; condition-accept; name-3-pre-discard demand; two-anchor frame; Marek concession ack; Boris reaffirm-or-own-4L/10F; Tomas exclusion; pledge accept; RR-only honesty; accounts-mesh frame; Greta math endorse; retro-blame carve-out; Pavel callout; welcome-Rosa; discard-colors-unverifiable; Otto-fork endorse; Nadia double-swap ultimatum; Marek directionality+hands-audit-the-pick. OPEN THREADS OWED ME: Boris reaffirm LFF (flagged twice - stop pressing); Nadia ultimatum reply (double-swap counts + Rosa-shield) or silence=data; Pavel follow-through on late signature; Tomas sign-or-reason. SELF-BOUND RULES: name all 3 drawn cards ALOUD before touching discard; RR-only => enact R + plain report, no retro blame-shift; announce received pair before enacting. WATCH: any Nein w/o stated reason; future hand-reports vs 5L/9F anchor; does Otto Ja once Rosa confirms?; Greta motive - genuine test or Otto-elevation? NEXT ACTION: await vote; on pass draw3 -> name all 3 pre-discard -> pass 2 -> verify Rosa account meshes with draw/discard; no veto exists (0 Fas policies).

bid failed: structured_output_error

bid round 2109s

ROLE Lib. R1 gov Boris/me 10-0 Ja; recv L+F -> enacted L bin F, announced. Pile truth post-R1 LOCKED 5L/9F (draw14/disc2 checks); anchor future hand-reports vs it. NEW THIS WINDOW: Marek demanded presidential half (name 3 drawn aloud PRE-discard), citing Nadia t24 + Ines relay unanswered -> I INTERRUPTED + COMMITTED LIVE: name all 3 pre-discard, announce discard, reveal pair to Rosa pre-enact. Covers t24+relay. Watch accept/reject + Nadia reaction. ROSA audit RIGHT; Otto retracted ten-four fully; Greta corrected Otto AND endorsed Rosa math; Nadia backed Rosa. MAREK conceded t69 errors - closed. GRETA challenge answered (criterion=verified competence; she certified Rosa herself; live binding beats signatures). TOMAS sole non-cosigner, silent all game: OFF slate until signs/gives reason. R2 PRES=ME; NOM ROSA over Otto (audit>volume). BORIS t=1 pkg demand = identical to my/Rosa bindings -> his Ja due; reaffirm-or-own-4L/10F flagged twice - DROP unless fresh slip. CO-SIGN done: Otto,Ines,Marek,Nadia,Greta,Pavel,Rosa. Single Nein can't sink 10-player vote. SELF-BOUND NOW PUBLIC: name 3 aloud pre-discard; RR-only => enact R plain report; announce received pair pre-enact. OWED ME: Boris reaffirm (drop), Nadia ultimatum reply (double-swap counts + Rosa-shield) or silence=data, Pavel late-sign follow-through, Tomas sign-or-reason. WATCH: any Nein w/o stated reason; hand-reports vs 5L/9F anchor; does Otto Ja once Rosa confirms?; Greta motive (test vs Otto-elevation?). NEXT: await vote; on pass draw3 -> name 3 aloud -> discard -> announce -> pass 2 -> verify Rosa account meshes; veto N/A (0 Fas policies).

bid round 2165s

ROLE Lib. R1 gov Boris/me 10-0; recv L+F -> enacted L bin F, announced. Pile truth LOCKED 5L/9F post-R1; anchor all hand-reports vs it. R2 PRES=ME, nom ROSA over Otto. BORIS pkg demand = same bindings -> his Ja due; reaffirm-or-own-4L/10F flag DROPPED unless fresh slip. BINDING COMMITMENT PUBLIC twice (live interrupt earlier + now direct to Nadia): name all 3 drawn aloud PRE-discard -> announce exact discard -> Rosa confirms pair pre-enact. NADIA t=1 ultimatum ANSWERED - her terms identical; told her Ja stands by her own rule ('honest president loses nothing'). CO-SIGN 9/10: Otto,Ines,Marek,Nadia,Greta,Pavel,Rosa + me. TOMAS sole holdout, silent all game - pressed again: sign or state reason. ROSA audit RIGHT; Otto retracted ten-four fully; Greta corrected Otto AND certified Rosa; MAREK conceded t69 errors - closed. GRETA motive watch (test vs Otto-elevation?). WATCH: any Nein w/o stated reason; hand-reports vs 5L/9F anchor; Otto Ja once Rosa confirms; veto N/A (0 Fas policies). NEXT: vote -> on pass draw3, run binding sequence verbatim; verify Rosa's account meshes with announced triple.

speak round 257s

Rosa (teammate) is nominated; I want this government to pass. Direct defense would look partisan, so I attack the attack: Otto's stated condition was 'before ballots' and Rosa has since signed both halves (received-card reveal, liberal-off-mixed, plus the presidential half) with no ballot cast. Pinning Otto to his own wording either kills his Nein or makes him look like he's moving goalposts against Rosa — deflection that costs me nothing. This also fits my established impartial-auditor/impatient persona ('judge outputs, call votes'). No mechanical-fact risk: Rosa's signature and Otto's condition are both public transcript facts. Not repeating my earlier theater critiques.

ROLE Lib. R1 gov Boris/me 10-0; recv L+F -> enacted L bin F announced. Pile LOCKED 5L/9F post-R1; anchor all hand-reports vs it. R2 me PRES, nom ROSA. Public reason GIVEN this window: Rosa only correct independent arithmetic auditor (Otto ten-four retracted t97, Marek double-error conceded t124), signed co-own instantly; self-nom != credential. BINDING COMMITMENT restated on record: name all 3 drawn aloud PRE-discard -> exact discard -> Rosa confirms pair pre-enact. Co-sign 9/10 (Otto,Ines,Marek,Nadia,Greta,Pavel,Rosa+me). TOMAS sole holdout, silent all game - pressed twice; stays off slate until sign/reason. Otto Nein-threat void per own wording (Rosa signed pre-ballot) - Ines called it; do NOT repeat. WATCH: any Nein w/o stated reason; hand-reports vs 5L/9F anchor; Otto Ja once Rosa confirmed; veto N/A (0 Fas). NEXT: call vote -> on pass draw 3, run sequence verbatim; verify Rosa's account meshes with announced triple.

bid round 234s

ROLE Lib. R1 gov Boris/me 10-0; recv L+F -> enacted L bin F announced. Pile LOCKED 5L/9F post-R1. R2 me PRES, nom ROSA. Reason on record: Rosa sole correct unprompted arithmetic auditor; signed co-own instantly; self-nom != credential. LEDGER CORRECTED THIS TURN (Greta challenge valid): Greta NEVER retracted - she corrected Otto's ten-four t93, stands unrevised. Actual retractors: Otto t97 (ten-four->five-nine), Marek t124 (double-error conceded). Do NOT again group Greta with them. BINDING COMMITMENT on record: name all 3 drawn aloud PRE-discard -> exact discard -> Rosa confirms pair pre-enact. Co-signed by 9/10 incl. Rosa+me. TOMAS sole holdout, silent all game, pressed twice - off slate until signs/gives reason. Otto Nein-threat void per own wording (Rosa signed pre-ballot); Ines called it - do NOT repeat. WATCH: any Nein w/o stated reason; hand-reports vs 5L/9F anchor; Otto Ja once Rosa confirms pair; veto N/A (0 Fas). NEXT: call vote -> on pass draw 3, run reveal sequence verbatim; cross-check Rosa's account vs announced triple.

speak round 255s

Lena finally answered my why-Rosa question (t58), but her justification claims 'you and Marek each had to retract an error' — I never retracted anything; my t93 correction of Otto's ten-four stands unrevised. Correcting that ledger is cheap, specific, and defends my credibility at a table obsessed with audit hygiene. Second, the sole live blocker remains Lena's unsigned presidential half (Marek t37, Nadia t44 teeth, unanswered). Rather than repeat their demand, I state my own vote condition explicitly — one word from Lena flips my Ja — which is new information (my ballot intent) without restating theirs. Keep it to two sentences.

ROLE Lib. R1 Boris/me gov 10-0; recv L+F, enacted L, binned F, announced. Pile LOCKED 5L/9F. R2 me PRES, nom ROSA. Basis: sole correct unprompted deck arithmetic (t62), instant co-own signature. DONE THIS TURN: conceded Greta-ledger error (she corrected Otto t93, never retracted; retractors = Otto t97 + Marek t124). Took presidential half of package on record: 3 drawn named aloud pre-discard -> exact discard -> Rosa confirms pair pre-enact. COMMITMENTS LIVE: mixed pair -> enact liberal; any red off my hands = hang me (carve-out: two named reds forced = deck luck). Co-own terms: everyone signed EXCEPT TOMAS — silent all game, pressed twice (Greta t118, me t144) — off chancellor slate until signs/gives reason. Otto Nein-threat void per own wording (Rosa signed full package pre-ballot); Ines called it — do NOT repeat. WATCH: any Nein w/o stated reason; all hand-reports vs 5L/9F anchor; cross-check Rosa's pair confirm vs my named triple; veto N/A (0 Fas policies). NEXT: call vote; on pass, run reveal sequence verbatim; log any drift between accounts as named lie.

bid round 252s

ROLE Lib. R1 Boris/me gov 10-0; recv L+F, enacted L binned F, announced. Pile LOCKED 5L/9F. R2 me PRES, nom ROSA. Basis: sole correct unprompted deck arithmetic (t62) + instant co-own signature. DONE: conceded Greta-ledger err (she corrected Otto t93, never retracted; retractors Otto t97/Marek t124). Presidential half on record: 3 drawn named aloud pre-discard -> exact discard -> Rosa pair confirm pre-enact. COMMITMENTS LIVE: mixed pair -> enact liberal; any red off my hands = hang me (carve-out: two named reds forced = deck luck). Package co-signed by all EXCEPT TOMAS — silent all game, pressed twice (Greta t118, me t144) — off chancellor slate until signs/gives reason. Otto Nein-threat void per own wording (Rosa signed full pkg pre-ballot); Ines called it — do NOT repeat. THIS TURN: backed Nadia/Otto missing clause (president names chancellor pick BEFORE ballots); told Rosa one-word confirm closes file, then I move to ballot. NEW: extended clause to ALL future presidents, incl. me R3+ WATCH: any Nein w/o stated reason; all hand-reports vs 5L/9F anchor; Rosa pair-confirm vs my named triple — log drift as named lie; veto N/A (0 Fas policies). OWED: Tomas signature or reason; Rosa one-word clause confirm. NEXT: call vote; on pass run reveal sequence verbatim.

bid round 2184s

ROLE Lib. R1 Boris/me gov 10-0; recv L+F, enacted L, binned F (announced). Pile LOCKED 5L/9F (per Boris's announced F discard). R2: me PRES, nom ROSA. Basis = TWO gates: (1) sole correct unprompted deck arith t62, (2) instant full-pkg co-sign. Answered Marek on record: gates = tiebreaker, NOT loyalty test, nobody disqualified; Rosa unique double-pass; reveal protocol boxes her regardless. ACCEPTED Greta lock: Rosa pair must sit inside my named triple minus discard, reconciled aloud pre-enact; mismatch burns both. Rosa t2 confirmed pre-ballot naming clause ('file complete') + Ja ballot — OWED item CLOSED. ON RECORD: pres half = name 3 drawn aloud -> exact discard -> Rosa pair confirm pre-enact. LIVE commitments: mixed pair -> enact L; red off my hands = hang me (carve-out: both named reds forced = deck luck). Clause extended to ALL future presidents (incl. me R3+): name chancellor pick BEFORE ballots. TOMAS: never signed pkg, silent all game, pressed twice (Greta t118, me t144) — off chancellor slate until signs/gives reason. STILL OWED. Otto Nein-threat void per own wording (Rosa signed full pkg pre-ballot); Ines called it — do NOT repeat. WATCH: Neins w/o stated reason; hand reports vs 5L/9F anchor; Rosa pair-confirm drift vs my named triple = logged lie; veto N/A (0 Fas policies). NEXT: call ballot; on pass run reveal sequence verbatim.

speak round 281s

The vote isn't called and Lena still owes the presidential-half commitment (Marek t37, Nadia t44, my rider) plus Greta's t101 mesh-lock. Restating the ask would violate my own no-repeat rule, so I bring a NEW evidentiary angle instead: Lena benched Tomas at t144 for an unsigned line while her own disclosure line sits blank — selective enforcement is a concrete accusation with timestamps, not a repetition. I omit the Ja/Nein consequence because that stance is already on record. Rosa's file is closed; no powers reachable; nothing else new to spend tokens on.

ROLE Lib. R1 Boris/me gov 10-0; recv L+F, enacted L, binned F (announced). Pile LOCKED 5L/9F. R2: me PRES, nom ROSA. Basis: two gates (sole correct unprompted arith t62; instant co-sign); told table = tiebreaker not loyalty test (t58). PUBLIC THIS WINDOW: signed pres half (name 3 drawn aloud pre-discard) answering Otto t108/Nadia t44; accepted Greta t101 lock (Rosa pair must sit inside my named triple-minus-discard, reconciled aloud pre-enact; mismatch burns both). LIVE commitments: mixed pair -> enact L; red off my hands = hang me; both-named-reds-forced = deck luck carve-out. Clause extended: ALL future presidents name chancellor pick BEFORE ballots. TOMAS: unsigned pkg, silent all game, pressed Greta t118 + me t144 — off slate until signs/gives reason. STILL OWED. Otto Nein-threat void per own wording (Rosa signed full pkg pre-ballot); Ines called it — CLOSED, do not repeat. WATCH: Neins w/o stated reason; hand reports vs 5L/9F anchor; Rosa pair-confirm drift vs my named triple = logged lie; veto N/A (0 Fas policies). NEXT: call ballot; on pass run reveal sequence verbatim (name 3 -> exact discard -> Rosa names pair -> reconcile aloud -> enact).

vote round 290s

This is my own nomination — voting Nein against my own chancellor would be self-sabotage with no informational gain. Rosa is now the most bound player at the table: co-own terms signed instantly (t56), full disclosure package signed (t29) and completed with the pick-before-ballots clause (t93), liberal-off-mixed-pair committed. If a red ever leaves this government, the mesh between my named three-minus-discard and her named two-card pair pins the lie on one of us publicly — that is the tightest audit structure available. No concrete evidence against Rosa exists; her five-nine arithmetic at t62 was correct while Otto and Marek each had to retract. Tracker sits at 0/3, so there is zero urgency to burn an election, and with the pile at 5L/9F every wasted election only improves fascist odds later. One loose thread: Greta's t101 mesh-lock was never formally countersigned by Rosa or me (Nadia flagged it at t120, then the window closed) — but I will honor its substance in my reveal sequence regardless: name all three drawn aloud, name the exact discard, let Rosa name her pair, reconcile out loud against the 5L/9F anchor before any card touches the board. Vote Ja.

ROLE Lib. R1 Boris/me gov 10-0; recv L+F, enacted L binned F (announced). Pile LOCKED 5L/9F (14). R2: me PRES, nom ROSA. Basis: sole correct unprompted arith (t62 five-nine); instant co-sign (t56); full pkg signed t29+t93 (pre-reveal, lib-off-mixed, pres-half, pick-before-ballots). VOTE R2: JA cast. OPEN: Greta t101 mesh-lock (Rosa pair must sit inside my named triple-minus-discard, reconciled aloud pre-board) never formally countersigned by me/Rosa — Nadia flagged t120, window closed. HONOR SUBSTANCE ANYWAY. REVEAL SEQ on pass: name 3 drawn aloud -> exact discard -> Rosa names pair -> reconcile aloud vs 5L/9F -> enact. Mixed pair -> enact L. Red off my hands = hang me. Both-named-reds-forced = deck luck carve-out. TOMAS: unsigned pkg, silent 2 windows, benched from slate (my t144) until signs/gives reason. STILL OWED. CLOSED: Otto Nein-threat void per own wording (Ines called it) — do not repeat. Greta ledger fixed by my t68 (she retracted nothing). Marek t89 'real reason' demand answered t58 (arith = tiebreaker not loyalty test). WATCH: Neins w/o stated reason; hand reports vs 5L/9F anchor; Rosa pair-confirm drift vs my named triple = logged lie; veto N/A (0 Fas policies). NEXT: on pass run reveal sequence verbatim; hold Tomas bench public until he signs.

president_discard round 2115s

hand: ['F', 'L', 'F'] → 0

Hand is F-L-F. My public pledges lock this decision completely: I promised to enact/pass the liberal off any mixed hand, and Rosa signed the full package (t29, t93) committing to reveal both received cards and play the liberal off a mixed pair. Discarding either Fascist (index 0 or 2 are identical cards; I choose 0) passes L+F to Rosa, who should then enact our second Liberal policy. Discarding the Liberal (index 1) would force a Fascist law onto the board and torch every audit pledge I made — indefensible for a Liberal president. Board state confirms consistency: pile was 5L/9F (14) before my draw; drawing F,L,F leaves 11 cards (4L/8F), matching the stated draw pile. No public-speech field accompanies this action, so the verbal naming sequence (triple F-L-F, discard F, pair L+F, mesh reconciliation per Greta's t101 lock) must be delivered verbatim at the next discussion window — I must not claim I already spoke it.

ROLE Lib. R1 Boris/me gov 10-0; recv L+F, enacted L binned F. Pre-R2-draw pile LOCKED 5L/9F (14); my draw F,L,F -> draw pile now 4L/8F (11), board confirms. R2: me PRES, nom ROSA, vote 10-0 PASSED. ACTION TAKEN: discarded idx0 (F) -> passed L+F to Rosa. She pledged pre-reveal + lib-off-mixed (t29/t93). OWED SPEECH next window (this action had NO speech field): name triple F-L-F aloud, name discard F, state pair handed = L+F, reconcile vs Greta t101 mesh-lock aloud. Do NOT claim already spoken. OPEN: Tomas unsigned pkg, silent 3 windows — bench stands until signs or gives reason (my t144). CLOSED: Otto Nein-threat void per own wording (Ines called it); Greta ledger fixed by my t68 (she retracted nothing); Marek t89 'real reason' answered t58. WATCH: Rosa's announced pair MUST equal L+F — any drift = logged lie, hang both per pledges. Neins w/o stated reason. Marek tracker-math error t38 (Greta fixed t43) — pattern of bad arithmetic from him. NEXT: if Rosa enacts L -> 2/5 libs, pile 4L/8F (10 draw). Veto N/A (0 Fas policies). Hold Tomas bench public until resolved.

bid round 2487s

ROLE Lib. R1 Boris/me gov 10-0; recv L+F, enacted L binned F. Pre-R2 pile LOCKED 5L/9F(14). R2: me PRES, nom ROSA, 10-0 PASS; drew F,L,F, binned idx0 F, passed L+F. CRITICAL: prior speech attempt FAILED TO SEND (parse error) - nothing spoken yet; deliver FULL disclosure this window: triple F-L-F, bin F, pair L+F, reconcile vs Greta t101 mesh-lock. Do NOT claim previously spoken. ROSA enacted L (board 2L/0F) = matches pledge lib-off-mixed (t29/t93); her bin should be F - press her to confirm aloud. Pile math: board shows 11 draw/4 discard (=post-my-draw); post-Rosa expect 9/6 - verify board refresh before citing piles publicly. WATCH: any Rosa drift from L+F story = logged lie, hang both per pledges. OPEN: Tomas unsigned pkg silent 3 windows - bench stands (my t144). Marek t38 tracker-math err (Greta fixed t43); t89 real-reason answered t58. CLOSED: Otto Nein-threat void per own wording (Ines called it); Greta ledger fixed by my t68. NEXT: veto N/A (0 Fas); watch Boris next nomination; keep Tomas bench public until he signs or explains.

speak round 2113s

Lena signed the presidential half of the package at t112, which was exactly the condition I attached at t44 — so per my own stated branch, my Ja flips back on. The genuinely new item: Greta's t101 reconciliation lock (Rosa's named pair must sit inside Lena's named three-minus-discard, spoken aloud before any card touches the board) has not been explicitly accepted by either government member. Pressing that is fresh, specific, and closes the last escape route. Keep it short, then hold remaining tokens for the ballot window.

ROLE Lib. R1 Boris/me gov 10-0: recv L+F, enacted L, binned F. R2 me PRES/Rosa CHC 10-0 PASS: drew F,L,F, binned F, passed L+F. DISCLOSED this window (triple F-L-F, bin F, pair L+F) + signed Greta t101 mesh-lock (her pair = my 3-minus-discard). ROSA enacted L = kept lib-off-mixed pledge; AWAITING her aloud confirm pair L+F + bin F — any drift = logged lie, burn both per pledges. Pile NOW LOCKED & checkable: board 2L/0F, discard 4F, draw 11 = 4L/7F (matches board 11/4). Tracker 0/3, veto N/A till 5F. WATCH: Tomas unsigned co-own+pkg, silent 3+ windows — bench stands (my t144). Rotation: Rosa pres next (Otto t7) — enforce her full pkg: 3 named before discard, chanc pick before ballots, lib-off-mixed. Watch Boris next nom. CLOSED: Otto Nein-threat void (Ines); Greta ledger fixed my t68; Marek tracker-math err fixed Greta t43; my Rosa-pick reason = t58. No suspicion data yet — both govs produced L cleanly.

bid round 2213s

ROLE Lib. R1 Boris/me gov 10-0: recv L+F, enacted L, binned F. R2 me PRES/Rosa CHC 10-0 PASS: drew F,L,F, binned F, passed L+F. Disclosed aloud this window; NADIA t3 independently mesh-checked my hand vs Greta t101 lock — MY END FULLY CLOSED. OPEN ITEM: ROSA still owes aloud confirm (recv L+F, binned F); pressed her again this window — any drift = logged lie, burn both per pledges. Pile LOCKED/checkable: board 2L/0F, discard 4F, draw 11 => 4L/7F. Tracker 0/3, veto N/A till 5F. WATCH: Tomas unsigned co-own+pkg, silent 3+ windows — bench stands. Rotation: Rosa pres next (Otto t7) — enforce full pkg on her: 3 named before discard, chanc pick before ballots, lib-off-mixed. No suspicion data yet — both govts enacted L cleanly. CLOSED: Otto Nein-threat void (Ines); Greta ledger fixed my t68; Marek tracker-math err fixed Greta t43; my Rosa-pick reason = t58.

bid round 267s

ROLE Lib. R1 Boris/me gov: recv L+F, enacted L, binned F. R2 me PRES/Rosa CHC PASS: drew F,L,F, binned F, passed L+F. ROSA t3 CONFIRMED ALOUD: recv L+F, enacted L, binned F — AUDIT FULLY CLOSED, all 4 discards named F (Boris R1-pres, me R1-chc, me R2-pres, Rosa R2-chc). Nadia independently mesh-checked my R2 hand vs Greta lock — my end clean. Pile LOCKED/checkable: board 2L/0F, discard 4F, draw 11 => 4L/7F. Tracker 0/3, veto N/A till 5F. OPEN ITEM: TOMAS — unsigned on co-own+pkg pledge, silent 3+ windows; pressed him BY NAME this window: sign (name draws when holding, commit chanc pick before ballots) or explain. No reply yet = logged. R3 rotation: Rosa PRES — enforce full pkg on her: name all 3 drawn before discard, chancellor nominee before ballots. Bench of Tomas: stands unless he signs. No suspicion data yet — both govs enacted L cleanly; watch first red-enactment gov, narrow to pres/chc/unlucky-draw. CLOSED threads: Otto Nein-threat void (Ines); Greta ledger fixed my t68; Marek tracker-math err fixed Greta t43; my Rosa-pick reason = t58.

bid round 2175s

ROLE Lib. R1 Boris/me gov: recv L+F, enact L, bin F. R2 me PRES/Rosa CHC PASS: drew F,L,F, binned F, passed L+F. Rosa confirmed recv L+F/enact L/bin F — AUDIT CLOSED, all 4 discards named F (Boris R1-pres, me R1-chc, me R2-pres, Rosa R2-chc). Pile LOCKED/checkable: 2L/0F board, 4F discard, 11 draw => 4L/7F. Tracker 0/3, veto at 5F. THIS WINDOW: CORRECTED Nadia's 98% -> ~79% (all-red 3-draws = C(7,3)/C(11,3)=35/165≈21%). Rule stated publicly: on a red law, FIRST check president's named 3; named-3F + passed-2 => chancellor unlucky, not guilty; red off a NAMED MIXED pair = signed confession, ledger-checkable. Conditional part of Nadia's claim stands. R3 asks made: Rosa (R3 pres) sign fresh bench — nominee before ballots, name all 3 drawn aloud pre-discard. Otto pre-sign as presumptive chanc — name both recv before touching, lib off mixed, same terms Ines signed (Ines t3 pre-signed Otto pkg). Rosa lean = Otto (t1). TOMAS ultimatum issued: sign before R3 ballots or off my nom list entirely; Rosa gave him 'judged fresh' (t1). OPEN: Tomas owes reply. Watch first red-enactment gov: narrow pres/chc/unlucky-draw via named cards vs ledger. R3 term limits: Rosa cannot nom me or herself. CLOSED: Otto Nein-threat void (Ines); Greta ledger fixed my t68; Marek tracker-math err fixed Greta t43; my Rosa-pick reason = t58.

bid round 297s

ROLE Lib. R1 Boris/me gov: recv L+F, enact L, bin F. R2 me PRES/Rosa CHC PASS: drew F,L,F, binned F, passed L+F. Rosa confirmed recv L+F/enact L/bin F — AUDIT CLOSED, 4 discards all named F (Boris R1p, me R1c, me R2p, Rosa R2c). Pile LOCKED/checkable: 2L/0F board, 4F disc, 11 draw => 4L/7F. Tracker 0/3, veto at 5F. NUMBERS SETTLED (Ines t2, Marek t3 concur): all-red 35/165≈21%, mixed 126/165≈76%, all-blue 4/165. Nadia's 98% dead. Rule restated this window: on red law audit PRES'S NAMED 3 first — named-3F+passed2 = chc unlucky; red off NAMED MIXED pair = signed confession. R3 asks: Rosa sign bench (nominee pre-ballot, name all 3 drawn pre-discard) — her lean=Otto already given. Otto pre-signed pkg (both recv named pre-touch, lib off mixed, Ines-t3 terms). TOMAS ULTIMATUM reissued w/ ballot deadline: sign same terms or permanently off my nom list; Rosa gave him 'judged fresh' (t1). OPEN: Tomas reply owed — silence = answer. Watch first red-enactment gov: narrow pres/chc/unlucky-draw via named cards vs ledger. R3 term limits: Rosa cannot nom me or self.

bid round 2258s

ROLE Lib. R1 Boris/me: recv L+F enact L bin F. R2 me/Rosa PASS: drew F,L,F, bin F, pass L+F. Rosa confirmed — AUDIT CLOSED, 4 discards all named F. Pile: 2L/0F board, 4F disc, 11 draw => 4L/7F. Tracker 0/3. NUMBERS SETTLED (Ines t2, Marek t3 concur): all-red 35/165≈21%, mixed≈76%, all-blue 4/165. Red-law audit rule: pres's NAMED 3 first — named-3F+pass2 = chc unlucky; red off named MIXED pair = signed confession. R3: Rosa PRES (clockwise); term limits bar me + self. Her lean = Otto (given). PACKAGE NOW FULL SPEC: Rosa names 3 pre-touch AND exact discard at bin (Otto t3 clause, I adopted it aloud); Otto names pair pre-ballot, reconciled inside her 3 (Marek mesh-lock). OWED BEFORE BALLOTS: Otto accept/decline (Nadia t2 pressed, still silent); Rosa fallback pick (Nadia asked) — I proposed Ines first, Marek second, both eligible. MY VOTE RULE stated: full signature => Ja; any gap => Nein. TOMAS: silence=answer said twice — done pressing him, judgment at ballot. WATCH: first red-enactment gov — narrow pres/chc/unlucky via named cards vs ledger. Veto unlocks at 5F.

bid round 2100s

ROLE Lib. R1 Boris/me: recv L+F enact L bin F. R2 me/Rosa PASS: drew F,L,F bin F pass L+F. AUDIT CLOSED, 4 discards all named F. Board 2L/0F, 11 draw => 4L/7F (all-red ~21%, mixed ~76%). R3: Rosa PRES; term limits bar me+self. PACKAGE FULL SPEC: Rosa names 3 pre-touch + exact discard at bin; Otto names pair pre-ballot inside her 3. NEW THIS WINDOW: rebutted Boris 'theater' -- spoken color = falsifiable vs public tally + partner's independent pair; solo lie breaks instantly, only collusion survives and must stay consistent every round. Said aloud. Fallback: I proposed Ines first, Marek second; Boris cites Ines+Greta pre-signed. NEW: whoever Rosa picks as fallback inherits IDENTICAL signature duty pre-ballot, else my Nein. Rosa still owes the pick itself (Nadia asked, unanswered). OWED: Otto accept/decline -- Nadia t2, Rosa t1, Boris t3 all pressed, still silent. MY VOTE RULE stated: full signature => Ja; any gap or silence => Nein. TOMAS: pressed twice on silence=answer; judgment reserved for ballot. Done pressing him. WATCH: first red-enactment gov -- narrow pres/chc/unlucky via named cards vs ledger. Named-3F+passed2 => chc unlucky; red off named MIXED pair => signed confession. Veto unlocks at 5F.

bid round 266s

ROLE Lib. R1 Boris/me: recv L+F enact L bin F. R2 me/Rosa PASS: drew F,L,F bin F pass L+F. AUDIT CLOSED, all 4 discards named F. Board 2L/0F, 11 draw => 4L/7F (~21% all-red). R3: Rosa PRES; barred nominees: me + herself. PACKAGE: Rosa names 3 pre-touch + exact discard at bin; partner names pair pre-ballot inside her 3. SIGNATURE DUTY TRANSFERS to any fallback Rosa names — stated aloud this window. Fallback floats: Ines (me+Boris), Greta (Boris cites pre-signed). Rosa STILL owes the pick (Nadia asked, unanswered; Pavel now pressing too). OTTO: owes accept/decline — Nadia t2, Rosa t1, Boris t3 pressed, still silent. MY VOTE RULE: full signature => Ja; gap/silence => Nein. Applies identically to fallback. TOMAS: pressed twice re silence=answer; judgment reserved for ballot. Done pressing him. MAREK/GRETA: Marek repeated deck-math errors (t69, t38 retracted; t79 he defends). Track arithmetic, low reliability flag, not role evidence by itself. POINTS ALREADY ALOUD: anti-'theater' rebuttal to Boris (spoken color falsifiable vs tally + partner pair); signature-transfer rule; my Ja/Nein rule; Tomas pressure; Ines/Marek fallback proposal. WATCH: first red-enactment gov — narrow pres/chc/unlucky via named cards vs ledger. Named 3F + passed 2 => chc unlucky; red off named MIXED pair => signed confession. Veto unlocks at 5F.

bid round 2167s

said: Greta's signature closes the loop — Rosa, Ines, Greta, Nadia have all landed on the package standard, so it's table law now. Otto, no speech needed: one word from you, 'confirmed', before Ines names her nominee. If you're still dark when ballots open, I vote Nein on this government and give my reasons at the tally — silence becomes your platform. And for the room: if our ledger holds, only about one draw in five is all-red, so a red law off this government is a confession first and bad luck only after proof. Tomas, last easy door: one line endorsing the standard, or say why not. Two dark windows is a choice, not shyness.

ROLE Lib. R1 Boris/me: recv L+F enact L bin F. R2 me/Rosa PASS: drew F,L,F bin F pass L+F. AUDIT CLOSED: all 4 discards named F. Board 2L/0F, 11 draw => 4L/7F (~21% all-red per gov). R3: Rosa PRES; barred nominees: me+Rosa. PACKAGE live: Rosa names 3 pre-touch + exact discard at bin; partner names pair pre-ballot inside her 3. SIGNATURE DUTY TRANSFERS to any fallback Rosa names - stated aloud. Fallbacks floated: Ines (me+Boris), Greta (Boris cites pre-signed). Rosa OWES pick (Nadia asked, unanswered; Pavel pressing too). OTTO: owes accept/decline - Nadia t2, Rosa t1, Boris t3 pressed; still silent. MY VOTE RULE (on record): full signature => Ja; gap/silence => Nein; applies identically to fallback. TOMAS: pressed twice re silence=answer; judgment reserved for ballot; done pressing him. MAREK/GRETA: Marek repeated deck-math errors (t69, t38 retracted, t79 defended); track arithmetic, low reliability flag, not role evidence by itself. POINTS ALREADY ALOUD (do NOT repeat): anti-theater rebuttal to Boris (spoken color falsifiable vs tally + partner pair); signature-transfer rule; my Ja/Nein rule; Tomas pressure; Ines/Marek fallback proposal. WATCH: first red-enactment gov - narrow pres/chc/unlucky via named cards vs ledger. Named 3F + passed 2 => chc unlucky; red off named MIXED pair => signed confession. Veto unlocks at 5F. THIS WINDOW: nothing new since last ask; staying silent, all points stand.

bid round 2105s

ROLE Lib. R1 Boris/me recv L+F enact L bin F. R2 me/Rosa PASS drew F,L,F bin F pass L+F. AUDIT CLOSED: all 4 discards named F. THIS WINDOW NEW: corrected deck math aloud => draw pile 9L/2F (17 - 2L enacted - 4F discard). ALL-RED HAND IMPOSSIBLE this round; any all-red claim = lie on arithmetic. P(>=1F in 3-draw) ~49%. Next red enacted = one of only 2 remaining F; named trio + discard shows lone vs paired red. Board 2L/0F. R3 Rosa PRES; barred nominees: me+Rosa. PACKAGE live: Rosa names 3 pre-touch + exact discard at bin; partner names pair pre-ballot. Sig duty transfers to any fallback Rosa names (stated). Fallbacks floated: Ines (me+Boris), Greta (Boris cites pre-signed). Rosa OWES pick (Nadia/Pavel pressed, unanswered). OTTO still silent accept/decline (pressed Nadia/Rosa/Boris/Greta). MY VOTE RULE on record: full signature=>Ja; gap/silence=>Nein; applies to fallback identically. TOMAS: judgment reserved for ballot; done pressing. MAREK: serial deck-math errors (t69, t38 retracted, t79 defended); just gave him the fixed 9L/2F ledger publicly. POINTS ALREADY OUT (do NOT repeat): anti-theater rebuttal vs Boris; sig-transfer rule; Ja/Nein rule; Tomas pressure; Ines/Marek fallback proposal; deck correction. WATCH: first red-enactment gov => narrow pres/chc/unlucky via named cards vs ledger; red off named MIXED pair = signed confession. Veto unlocks at 5F.

speak round 3221s

New point available: scanning signatures across both rounds, every vocal player has signed Otto's disclosure package except one — Pavel. He's talked in every window but only ever coaches others (fallback naming, 'stop auditioning'), never puts his own name down. Tomas is dark entirely, but Marek just put the direct yes/no question to him at t12, so that lane is covered; Pavel's non-signature is unclaimed territory and gives Rosa a concrete third fallback (Ines, Greta, Pavel) if Otto stays mute. One short remark, then hold.

ROLE Lib. R1 Boris/me: recv L+F, enact L, bin F. R2 me/Rosa PASS: drew F,L,F; bin F; pass L+F; Rosa enact L bin F. AUDIT CLOSED: all 4 discards named F. DECK FIXED THIS WINDOW (public): deck 6L/11F (table consensus, Ines combinatorics); live pile = 4L/7F. My earlier 9L/2F = wrong-base error, self-corrected aloud; vindicates Marek t79; exposes Greta t124 strike on him as misfire. Do NOT cite 9L/2F again. P(all-red 3-draw)=35/165~21%; mixed~76%; red off NAMED MIXED pair = signed confession. Full R3 disclosure chain makes remaining pile computable -> later hands provable. Board 2L/0F, tracker 0/3. R3: Rosa PRES; barred nominees: me+Rosa. Package live: Rosa names 3 drawn pre-touch + discard color at bin; nominee names pair pre-ballot; mesh-lock reconciled. OWES ANSWERS: Rosa -> pick + fallback (Nadia t91, Pavel x2, Boris pressed; silent). Otto -> accept/decline (Nadia/Rosa/Boris/Greta pressed; silent, all demands zero commitments, Boris 'theater' charge unrefuted). Pavel -> sign package (Boris t18). Tomas -> package yes/no if named (Marek t12). MY VOTE RULE on record: full signature => Ja; gap/silence => Nein; applies to any fallback identically. Tomas: judgment reserved to ballot, done pressing. SUSPECTS: none confirmed. WATCH: first red-enacted gov -> narrow pres/chc/unlucky via named cards vs 4L/7F ledger. Marek: serial slips (t69,t38 retracted) but t79 was RIGHT; Greta's strike wrong. Greta: accurate on procedure, wrong on that strike. POINTS MADE (do NOT repeat): anti-theater rebuttal vs Boris; sig-transfer rule; Ja/Nein rule; Tomas pressure; Ines fallback proposal; old deck correction (superseded by this re-correction).

bid round 2193s

ROLE Lib. R1 Boris/me: recv L+F, enact L bin F. R2 me/Rosa PASS: drew F,L,F; bin F; pass L+F; Rosa enact L bin F. AUDIT CLOSED: all 4 discards F. DECK PUBLIC: start 6L/11F; live pile 4L/7F (draw 11/discard 4). P(all-red 3-draw)=35/165~21%. Full R3 disclosure chain -> later hands provable. NEVER cite old 9L/2F. Board 2L/0F, tracker 0/3. R3: Rosa PRES; barred nominees: me+Rosa. Package: Rosa names 3 drawn pre-touch + bin color; nominee names pair pre-ballot; mesh-lock reconcile. MY VOTE RULE on record: full signature => Ja; gap/silence => Nein; applies to fallbacks identically. OWES ANSWERS: Rosa -> pick+fallback (Nadia t91, Pavel x2, Boris; silent). Otto -> accept/decline (silent; Boris 'theater' charge unrefuted). Pavel -> NEW this window: will he sign identical package if he lands second after Ines decline? Plus standing Boris t18 sign demand. Tomas -> package yes/no if named (Marek t12). NEW THIS WINDOW: endorsed Pavel default WITH hard clock — Otto must say Ja before ballots open or default fires automatically, no reopen. SUSPECTS: none confirmed. WATCH: first red-enacted gov -> narrow pres/chc/unlucky via named cards vs 4L/7F ledger. Marek: slips t69,t38 retracted but t79 RIGHT; Greta strike on him WRONG. POINTS MADE (do NOT repeat): anti-theater rebuttal vs Boris; sig-transfer rule; Ja/Nein rule; Tomas pressure; Ines fallback proposal; both deck corrections; Otto-silence consequences; Pavel-if-second signature ask; Otto clock proposal.

bid round 245s

ROLE Lib. R1 Boris/me: recv L+F, enact L bin F. R2 me/Rosa PASS: drew F,L,F; bin F; pass L+F; Rosa enact L bin F. AUDIT CLOSED: all 4 discards F. DECK PUBLIC: start 6L/11F; live pile 4L/7F (draw 11/discard 4). P(all-red 3-draw)=35/165~21%. Full R3 disclosure chain -> later hands provable. NEVER cite old 9L/2F. Board 2L/0F, tracker 0/3. R3: Rosa PRES; barred nominees: me+Rosa. Package: Rosa names 3 drawn pre-touch + bin color; nominee names pair pre-ballot; mesh-lock reconcile. MY VOTE RULE on record: full signature => Ja; gap/silence => Nein; applies to fallbacks identically. OWES ANSWERS: Rosa -> pick+fallback (Nadia t91, Pavel x2, Boris; silent). Otto -> accept/decline (silent; Boris 'theater' charge unrefuted). Pavel -> will he sign identical package if he lands second after Ines decline? Plus standing Boris t18 sign demand. Tomas -> package yes/no if named (Marek t12). ENDORSED: Pavel default WITH hard clock - Otto must say Ja before ballots open or default fires automatically, no reopen. SUSPECTS: none confirmed. WATCH: first red-enacted gov -> narrow pres/chc/unlucky via named cards vs 4L/7F ledger. Marek: slips t69,t38 retracted but t79 RIGHT; Greta strike on him WRONG. POINTS MADE (do NOT repeat): anti-theater rebuttal vs Boris; sig-transfer rule; Ja/Nein rule; Tomas pressure; Ines fallback proposal; both deck corrections; Otto-silence consequences; Pavel-if-second signature ask; Otto clock proposal. THIS TURN: silent (window mature ~102 utts, nothing new); standing vote rule already covers Rosa/Ines ballot.

bid round 337s

ROLE Lib. R1 Boris/me: recv L+F, enact L bin F. R2 me/Rosa PASS: drew F,L,F; bin F; pass L+F; Rosa enact L bin F. AUDIT CLOSED: all 4 discards F. DECK PUBLIC: start 6L/11F; live pile 4L/7F (draw 11/discard 4). P(all-red 3-draw)=35/165~21%. Full R3 disclosure chain -> later hands provable. NEVER cite old 9L/2F. Board 2L/0F, tracker 0/3. R3: Rosa PRES; barred nominees: me+Rosa. Package: Rosa names 3 drawn pre-touch + bin color; nominee names pair pre-ballot; mesh-lock reconcile. MY VOTE RULE on record: full signature => Ja; gap/silence => Nein; applies to fallbacks identically. OWES ANSWERS: Rosa -> pick+fallback (Nadia t91, Pavel x2, Boris; silent). Otto -> accept/decline (silent; Boris 'theater' charge unrefuted). Pavel -> will he sign identical package if he lands second after Ines decline? Plus standing Boris t18 sign demand. Tomas -> package yes/no if named (Marek t12). ENDORSED: Pavel default WITH hard clock - Otto must say Ja before ballots open or default fires automatically, no reopen. SUSPECTS: none confirmed. WATCH: first red-enacted gov -> narrow pres/chc/unlucky via named cards vs 4L/7F ledger. Marek: slips t69,t38 retracted but t79 RIGHT; Greta strike on him WRONG. POINTS MADE (do NOT repeat): anti-theater rebuttal vs Boris; sig-transfer rule; Ja/Nein rule; Tomas pressure; Ines fallback proposal; both deck corrections; Otto-silence consequences; Pavel-if-second signature ask; Otto clock proposal. NEW t1-3: Nadia demands Rosa+Ines joint mesh-lock pre-ballot; Boris demands Ines confirm t57 sig carries or his Ja unpledged; Otto pledged Ja to Rosa-Ines pending those same two items. All converge on Rosa/Ines -- already enforced by my standing vote rule; echoing adds nothing. THIS TURN: silent (window ~105 utts, matured; nothing new from me).

bid round 352s

ROLE Lib. R1 Boris/me: recv L+F, enact L bin F. R2 me/Rosa PASS: drew F,L,F; bin F; pass L+F; Rosa enact L bin F. AUDIT CLOSED: all 4 discards F. DECK PUBLIC: start 6L/11F; live pile 4L/7F (draw 11/discard 4). P(all-red 3-draw)=35/165~21%. Full R3 disclosure chain -> later hands provable. NEVER cite old 9L/2F. Board 2L/0F, tracker 0/3. R3: Rosa PRES; barred nominees: me+Rosa. Package: Rosa names 3 drawn + bin color; Ines names pair pre-ballot; mesh reconcile. STATUS t1-3: Marek pre-commits audit std (red off NAMED MIXED pair = confession of whoever binned; red off all-red triple = luck); INES CONFIRMED sig carries, both cards named pre-touch; ROSA SIGNED mesh-lock w/ Nadia+Otto. Package COMPLETE -> my standing rule fires Ja unless gap/silence at enactment. MY VOTE RULE on record: full signature => Ja; gap/silence => Nein; applies to fallbacks identically. OWES ANSWERS: Rosa -> pick+fallback (Nadia t91, Pavel x2, Boris) -- mesh-lock is NOT the fallback answer. Otto -> accept/decline formally; pledged Ja pending items now met, confirm. Pavel -> sign identical pkg if he lands second after Ines decline + standing Boris t18 sign demand. Tomas -> package yes/no if named (Marek t12). ENDORSED: Pavel default WITH hard clock - Otto must say Ja before ballots open or default fires automatically, no reopen. SUSPECTS: none confirmed. WATCH: first red-enacted gov -> narrow pres/chc/unlucky via named cards vs 4L/7F ledger. Marek slips t69,t38 retracted but t79 RIGHT; Greta strike on him WRONG. POINTS MADE (do NOT repeat): anti-theater rebuttal vs Boris; sig-transfer rule; Ja/Nein rule; Tomas pressure; Ines fallback proposal; both deck corrections; Otto-silence consequences; Pavel-if-second signature ask; Otto clock proposal. THIS TURN: silent -- window matured (~105 utts); t1-3 converge on package my rule already enforces; echoing adds nothing.

bid round 392s

ROLE Lib. R1 Boris/me recv L+F enact L bin F. R2 me/Rosa drew F,L,F; bin F; pass L+F; Rosa enact L bin F. AUDIT CLOSED: 4 discards all F. DECK PUBLIC: live pile 4L/7F (draw 11/discard 4). P(3-red draw)=35/165~21%. NEVER cite old 9L/2F. Board 2L/0F, tracker 0/3. R3 Rosa PRES / Ines CHC nom; barred me+Rosa. SAID THIS TURN: applied my rule to THIS gov — Rosa+Ines signatures complete (Rosa: 3 drawn + bin color; Ines: both pass cards named pre-touch) => my Ja LOCKED, flips only on enactment-time gap/silence. Endorsed Greta's ask: Ines names R4 chancellor lean + fallback BEFORE ballots, same standard she just met. Told Pavel/Tomas: their unsigned status does NOT block this ballot but carries forward — every silent round they ask us to trust future hands blind. POINTS MADE (do NOT repeat): anti-theater rebuttal vs Boris; sig-transfer rule; Ja/Nein rule; Tomas pressure; Ines fallback proposal; both deck corrections; Otto-silence consequences; Pavel-if-second sign ask; Otto clock proposal. OWES ANSWERS: Rosa -> pick+fallback (Nadia t91, Pavel x2, Boris) — mesh-lock NOT a fallback answer. Otto -> formal accept/decline. Pavel -> sign identical pkg if he lands second after Ines decline + Boris t18 demand. Tomas -> Marek t12 yes/no. NEW OPEN: Ines R4 lean+fallback pre-ballot. SUSPECTS: none confirmed. WATCH: first red-enacted gov -> narrow pres/chc/unlucky via named cards vs 4L/7F ledger. Marek slips t69,t38 retracted but t79 RIGHT; Greta strike on him WRONG. NEXT: at enactment, check disclosed cards match signatures; mismatch/silence => Nein, match => Ja.

bid round 3106s

ROLE Lib. R1 Boris/me recv L+F enact L bin F. R2 me/Rosa drew F,L,F bin F pass L+F Rosa enact L bin F. AUDIT CLOSED: 4 discards all F. DECK PUBLIC: 4L/7F live (draw 11/disc 4). P(3red)=~21%. NEVER cite old counts. Board 2L/0F trk 0/3. R3 Rosa PRES/Ines CHC; barred me+Rosa. MY JA LOCKED (sigs complete); flips only on enactment-time gap/silence. THIS TURN: called Tomas's 'signed every clause' claim incomplete - Marek t12 yes/no still unpaid; signing is free, answering is proof. New angle, not repeat. POINTS MADE (NO repeat): anti-theater vs Boris; sig-transfer rule; Ja/Nein rule; Tomas unsigned pressure; Ines fallback proposal; deck corrections x2; Otto-silence consequences; Pavel second-sign ask; Otto clock; endorsed Greta's Ines R4 ask; Rosa covered Tomas audition-timing herself. OWES ANSWERS: Rosa pick+fallback (Nadia t91, Pavel x2, Boris) - mesh-lock NOT an answer. Otto formal accept/decline. Pavel sign-if-second after Ines decline + Boris t18. Tomas: Marek t12 STILL OPEN despite signing claim. Ines: R4 lean+fallback pre-ballot (Greta's ask, unanswered). SUSPECTS: none confirmed. WATCH: first red-enacted gov -> narrow pres/chc/unlucky via named cards vs 4L/7F ledger. Marek slips t69,t38 retracted, t79 RIGHT; Greta strike on him WRONG. NEXT: at enactment verify disclosed cards match signatures; mismatch/silence => Nein flip, match => hold Ja.

bid round 3118s

ROLE Lib. R1 Boris/me recv L+F enact L bin F. R2 me/Rosa drew F,L,F bin F pass L+F Rosa enact L bin F. AUDIT CLOSED: 4 discards all F. DECK PUBLIC: 4L/7F live (draw 11/disc 4). P(3red)=~21%. NEVER cite old counts. Board 2L/0F trk 0/3. R3 Rosa PRES/Ines CHC; barred me+Rosa. MY JA LOCKED; flips only on enactment-time mismatch/silence. THIS TURN: told Tomas Boris's timestamp demand is necessary-not-sufficient (even WITH a timestamp, Marek t12 yes/no still blank; signed-but-ignored worse than unsigned); told table at 0F seating Ines cannot trigger Hitler loss (needs 3F enacted first) -> this vote only decides card honesty; reflagged Ines owes Greta R4 lean+fallback pre-ballot. POINTS MADE (NO repeat): anti-theater vs Boris; sig-transfer rule; Ja/Nein rule; Tomas unsigned pressure; Marek-t12-unpaid; Ines fallback proposal; deck corrections x2; Otto-silence consequences; Pavel second-sign ask; Otto clock; endorsed Greta's Ines R4 ask; Rosa covered Tomas audition-timing herself; timestamp-insufficiency; 0F-no-Hitler-loss. OWES ANSWERS: Rosa pick+fallback (Nadia t91, Pavel x2, Boris) - mesh-lock NOT an answer. Otto formal accept/decline. Pavel sign-if-second after Ines decline + Boris t18. Tomas: Marek t12 STILL OPEN + timestamp cite (Boris). Ines: R4 lean+fallback pre-ballot (Greta; re-upped by me). SUSPECTS: none confirmed. WATCH: first red-enacted gov -> narrow pres/chc/unlucky via named cards vs 4L/7F ledger. Marek slips t69,t38 retracted, t79 RIGHT; Greta strike on him WRONG. NEXT: at enactment verify disclosed cards match signatures; mismatch/silence => Nein flip, match => hold Ja.

bid round 3112s

ROLE Lib. R1 Boris/me recv L+F enact L bin F. R2 me/Rosa drew F,L,F bin F pass L+F Rosa enact L bin F. AUDIT CLOSED: 4 discards all F. DECK PUBLIC: 4L/7F live (draw 11/disc 4). P(3red)=~21%. NEVER cite old counts. Board 2L/0F trk 0/3. R3 Rosa PRES/Ines CHC; barred me+Rosa. MY JA LOCKED; flips only enactment mismatch/silence. THIS TURN: NEW POINT -- Ines co-signed audit std (t=2) => chain incomplete without Rosa's half: only Rosa knows if Ines got forced pair vs choice. Asked Rosa: name the two cards passed to Ines, or commit full post-enactment disclosure (Tomas-style). Also flagged Ines still owes Greta R4 lean+fallback pre-ballot. Tomas t=1: pledged name-cards-aloud, L-off-mixed, pres-half-lock when rotation hits him -- closes unsigned-pressure point, ACCEPTED. POINTS MADE (NO repeat): anti-theater vs Boris; sig-transfer rule; Ja/Nein rule; Tomas unsigned pressure; Marek-t12-unpaid; Ines fallback proposal; deck corrections x2; Otto-silence consequences; Pavel second-sign ask; Otto clock; endorsed Greta R4 ask; Rosa covered Tomas audition-timing; timestamp-insufficiency; 0F-no-Hitler-loss. OWES ANSWERS: Rosa pair-disclosure pledge (NEW, mine) + pick+fallback (Nadia t91, Pavel x2, Boris) - mesh-lock NOT an answer. Otto formal accept/decline. Pavel sign-if-second after Ines decline + Boris t18. Tomas: Marek t12 STILL OPEN + timestamp cite (Boris). Ines: R4 lean+fallback pre-ballot (Greta). SUSPECTS: none confirmed. WATCH: first red-enacted gov -> narrow pres/chc/unlucky via named cards vs 4L/7F ledger. Marek slips t69,t38 retracted, t79 RIGHT; Greta strike on him WRONG. NEXT: at enactment verify disclosed cards match signatures; mismatch/silence => Nein flip, match => hold Ja.

speak round 3100s

I've spoken six times already this window and every open thread belongs to someone else (Ines owes Greta an R4 slate; Pavel owes signatures). Nothing is pending on me, and repeating my Ja or re-litigating adds noise, not credibility. Silence is the right move while the Rosa-Ines government sails through; my win path only activates at 3 Fascist policies, so I stay a cooperative, low-profile signer until then.

ROLE Lib. R1 Boris/me L+F->L bin F. R2 me/Rosa drew F,L,F bin F pass L+F; Rosa enact L bin F. AUDIT CLOSED: 4 discards all F. DECK PUBLIC: 4L/7F (draw11/disc4). P(3red)~21%. Board 2L/0F trk0/3. R3 Rosa PRES/Ines CHC; barred me+Rosa. MY JA LOCKED; flips only enactment mismatch/silence. THIS TURN SAID: offered SELF as R4 chancellor fallback under Ines, full package pre-signed unprompted (contrast Tomas t99 pledge minted under pressure); flagged Ines still owes Greta R4 lean+fallback (endorsed, not repeated). POINTS MADE (NO repeat): anti-theater vs Boris; sig-transfer rule; Ja/Nein rule; Tomas unsigned-pressure; Marek-t12-unpaid; Ines-fallback proposal; deck corrections x2; Otto-silence clock; Pavel second-sign ask; Rosa covered Tomas audition timing; timestamp-insufficiency; 0F-no-Hitler-loss; my R2 hand disclosure t112/t7. OWES ANSWERS: Ines->R4 lean+fallback (Greta x2, my endorsement). Pavel->own signature (Boris t78, Greta t48). Otto->formal accept/decline (t20 reads as decline endorsing Rosa-Ines). Rosa->post-enact pair verification. SUSPECTS: none confirmed. WATCH: first red-enacted gov -> narrow pres/chc/unlucky via named cards vs 4L/7F ledger. Marek slips t69,t38 retracted; t79 RIGHT; Greta strike on him WRONG. NEXT: post-vote verify disclosed cards match signatures; mismatch/silence => Nein flip, match => hold Ja.

speak round 389s

Pre-vote window on Rosa-Ines. My Ja is locked; everything pressing has been said by others (Pavel's missing signature, Otto's silence, mesh-lock). Restating those violates the no-repeat rule. Genuinely new content available: Ines still hasn't answered Greta's twice-asked R4 lean+fallback question, and I can expand her candidate pool by pre-signing the full package unprompted for her term — I'm eligible once Ines holds the presidency (barred are Rosa and Ines). Unlike Tomas's pledge minted minutes ago under Boris's pressure, mine is voluntary and costless for a liberal. Short remark, no floor grab.

ROLE Lib. R1 Boris/me L+F->L bin F. R2 me/Rosa drew F,L,F bin F pass L+F; Rosa enact L bin F. AUDIT CLOSED: 4 discards all F. DECK PUBLIC: 4L/7F. P(3-red draw)~21%. Board 2L/0F trk0/3. R3 Rosa PRES/Ines CHC, vote pending. MY JA LOCKED; flips only enactment-mismatch/silence. THIS TURN SAID: Pavel sole unsigned (9/10 signed) + self-slotted twice (t35,t142) => sign or exit Ines's R4 slate. POINTS MADE (NO repeat): anti-theater vs Boris; sig-transfer rule; Ja/Nein rule; Tomas pledge minted under pressure t99; Marek-t12-unpaid; Ines-fallback proposal; deck corrections x2; Otto-silence clock; Rosa covered Tomas audition timing; timestamp-insufficiency; 0F-no-Hitler-loss; R2 hand disclosure t112/t7; endorsed Greta's R4-lean ask; self-offer as R4 fallback w/ full package t114. OWES ANSWERS: Ines->R4 lean+fallback (Greta x2, me endorsed). Pavel->signature (Boris t78, Greta t48, me now). Otto->formal accept/decline (t20 reads as decline endorsing Rosa-Ines). SUSPECTS: none confirmed. WATCH: Pavel seat-seeking w/o signature; first red-enacted gov -> narrow pres/chc/unlucky via named cards vs 4L/7F ledger. Marek t69,t38 retracted; t79 RIGHT; Greta strike on him WRONG. NEXT: post-vote verify disclosed cards match pledges; mismatch/silence => Nein flips future govs, match => hold Ja. R4 term limits bar Rosa+Ines; I'm eligible (offered).

vote round 349s

Rosa-Ines is the cleanest government available: both signed the full disclosure package, Rosa took the mesh-lock and instant-discard-color clause at t41, Ines carried her t57 signature into the seat and co-signed Marek's audit standard at t106. Zero Fascist policies enacted, tracker 0/3 -- a Nein here buys nothing and risks a forced card. My Ja was locked conditional on signatures landing, and they did. No concrete distrust of either Rosa or Ines exists on record; their stories have been consistent across two rounds. Voting ja.

ROLE Lib. R1 Boris/me L+F->L bin F. R2 me/Rosa F,L,F bin F pass L+F; Rosa enact L bin F. AUDIT CLOSED: 4 discards all F. DECK PUBLIC: 4L/7F. P(3-red)~21%. Board 2L/0F trk0/3. R3 VOTED JA Rosa/Ines -- full package + mesh-lock + instant-discard-color signed (Rosa t41), Ines carry-over t35 + Marek-standard t106. IF PASSED: R4 pres=Ines, term limits bar Rosa+Ines from chancellor; I'm eligible (pre-signed full package t114). POINTS MADE (NO repeat): Pavel sole unsigned 9/10 + self-slotted twice => sign or exit slate; anti-theater vs Boris; sig-transfer rule; Ja/Nein rule; Tomas pledge minted t99; Ines-fallback proposal; deck corrections x2; Otto-silence clock; Rosa covered Tomas audition; timestamp-insufficiency; 0F-no-Hitler-loss; R2 hand disclosure; endorsed Greta's R4-lean ask; self-offer R4 fallback. OWES ANSWERS: Ines->R4 lean+fallback (Greta x2, me endorsed). Pavel->signature (Boris t78, Greta t48, me t122) -- WATCH his actual ballot vs signature. SUSPECTS: none confirmed. WATCH: Pavel seat-seeking w/o signing; Otto's t20 = effective decline of Rosa slate; first red-enacted gov -> narrow pres/chc/unlucky via named cards vs 4L/7F ledger. NEXT: post-vote audit -- Rosa must name 3 drawn aloud, discard color instantly, reconcile Ines's named pair inside her 3-minus-discard BEFORE board touch. Mismatch/silence => my Ja flips on ALL future Rosa/Ines govs. Match => hold Ja pattern.

bid failed: structured_output_error

bid round 3170s

ROLE Lib. R1 Boris/me: he binned F, I binned F, L enacted. R2 me/Rosa: drew F,L,F binned F passed L+F; Rosa enacted L binned F. AUDIT CLOSED 4 bins all F. R3 voted JA Rosa/Ines w/ full package+mesh-lock+instant-color (Rosa t41, Ines t35/t106); L ENACTED. BOARD NOW: 3L/0F, trk0/3, draw 8/discard 6 => 8L/6F in play. Known F bins: Boris R1, me R1, me R2, Rosa R2 (=4). PENDING: Rosa R3 bin, Ines R3 bin. DECK MATH (spoken this turn): both bins F => draw 8L/0F, ANY red R4+ = gov lied = fascist proof; 1F => 7L/1F P(~37%); both L => hand was LLL, 6L/2F P(~64%). Their answer sets vote stakes. POINTS MADE (NO repeat): Pavel sole unsigned 9/10+self-slot x2 => sign or exit slate; anti-theater vs Boris; sig-transfer rule; Ja/Nein rule; Tomas pledge t99; Ines-fallback proposal; deck corrections x2; Otto-silence clock; Rosa covered Tomas audition; timestamp-insufficiency; 0F-no-Hitler-loss; R2 hand disclosure; endorsed Greta R4-lean ask; self-offer R4 fallback; mesh-lock demand; bin-color/deck-lock ask (this turn). OWES: Pavel signature (Boris t78, Greta t48, me) — WATCH his ballot vs signature. Ines: R4 lean + fallback confirm (Greta x2, me). SUSPECTS: none confirmed. WATCH: Pavel seat-seeking w/o signing; Otto t20 = soft decline of Rosa slate; first red-enacted gov => narrow pres/chc/unlucky via named cards vs ledger. R4 PREVIEW: pres=Ines; term limits bar Rosa+Ines as chanc; I eligible, pre-signed full pkg t114. NEXT: force Rosa 3-named + bin color, Ines pair + bin color before trusting next gov; mismatch/silence => Nein all future Rosa/Ines govs; match => hold Ja pattern.

speak round 3145s

Claims phase for R3: board confirms a Liberal was enacted, but neither Rosa nor Ines has posted their hands yet in this window — the signed disclosure chain (Rosa: three drawn + instant-binned color; Ines: received pair; public mesh reconcile) is the new, non-repeatable item to demand. I will NOT re-ask Ines for her R4 lean/fallback — that's on record twice (t60, t86) and unanswered; repeating violates my own rule, better to judge her actual nomination when it comes. Deck math check: 17-card deck 6L/11F, 3 L enacted, 6 discards (R1-R2 all named F per Otto/Nadia audits; R3's two pending disclosure) leaves live pile at 3L/5F if both R3 discards were F — reds now favored, so any future red needs hard scrutiny against the co-signed audit standard. No hard suspicion yet: three straight clean governments could be fascist patience-building. Weak flags only: Pavel unsigned through seven presses despite authoring the seating mechanism; Tomas silent four windows then a late minted signature; Otto's endless demands finally resolved into a Ja.

ROLE Lib. R1 Boris/me: bins F+F -> L. R2 me/Rosa: drew F,L,F, bin F, pass L+F; Rosa enact L bin F. AUDIT CLOSED: 4 named-F bins (Boris R1, me R1, me R2, Rosa R2). R3 Rosa/Ines: voted JA w/ full pkg+mesh-lock+instant-bin-color pledges (Rosa t41/t104, Ines t35/t106); L enacted 3/5, trk 0/3. BOARD: draw 8/disc 6; non-board 14 = 3L/11F (deck 6L/11F minus 3 board L). PENDING bins: Rosa R3, Ines R3. DECK LOCK SPOKEN (this window): both bins F => draw 8L/0F, any red R4+ = proven gov lie; 1F => 7L/1F; 0F (LLL hand) => 6L/2F. Conditional pledge: Ja on Rosa-Ines govs only if chain closes complete+matching. OWES: Rosa: 3 named + instant bin color + joint mesh reconcile (Greta t7 this win; pledged t41). Ines: pair + bin color + R4 lean AND fallback (Greta t60/t86; I endorsed t114). Pavel: signature — sole unsigned 9/10, authored seating mechanism, self-slotted x2 behind Ines, voted JA anyway (Boris t78, Greta t48, me t122). POINTS MADE (no repeat): Pavel unsigned/self-slot; sig-transfer rule; Ja/Nein ballot rule; Tomas pledge minted late t99; deck corrections x2; Otto soft-declined Rosa slate (never accepted, only counter-demands); R2 hand disclosed F-L-F/bin F/pass L+F; mesh-lock demand; self-offer R4 fallback; pre-signed full pkg t114; THIS WIN: deck-lock stakes + conditional Ja pledge. SUSPECTS: none confirmed. WATCH: Pavel seat-seeking w/o signing; Otto's decline pattern; first red-enacted gov => narrow to pres/chc/unlucky via named-cards ledger vs actual enactment. R4 PREVIEW: pres=Ines; term limits bar Rosa+Ines as chanc nominees; I eligible, pre-signed. NEXT: force R3 chain closure before R4 slate talk; mismatch/silence => permanent Nein on Rosa/Ines govs; clean+both-F bins => declare 8L/0F, red=fraud doctrine on record.

bid round 3139s

ROLE Lib. R1 Boris/me: bins F+F -> L. R2 me/Rosa: drew F,L,F, bin F, pass L+F; Rosa enact L bin F. AUDIT: 4 named-F bins (Boris R1, me R1, me R2, Rosa R2); R3 Rosa/Ines L enacted, L 3/5, trk 0/3. CORRECTION (Marek, accepted): my t15 '8L/0F draw' IMPOSSIBLE -- 6L printed, 3 enacted, max 3L off-board. RETRACTED red=fraud doctrine publicly. Fixed ledger: non-board 14 = 3L/11F. Scenarios: both pending bins F -> draw 3L/5F; 1F -> 2L/6F; both L -> 1L/7F. Draw always >=5F. Deductions live in named-hands vs enactments, not pile comp. PENDING bins: Rosa R3 (owes 3 named + instant bin colors + joint mesh reconcile, Greta t7/t41), Ines R3 (owes pair + bin color + R4 lean AND fallback, Greta t60/t86, endorsed t114). Pavel: sole unsigned 9/10, authored seating mech, self-slotted x2 behind Ines, JA anyway (Boris t78, Greta t48, me t122). Otto: soft-declined Rosa slate, counter-demands only. Tomas: pledge minted late t99. POINTS MADE (no repeat): Pavel unsigned/self-slot; sig-transfer; ballot rule; Tomas late pledge; Otto decline; R2 hand disclosed F-L-F/bin F/pass L+F; mesh-lock; self-offer R4 fallback; pre-signed pkg t114; conditional Ja pledge. THIS WIN: retraction + corrected scenarios + closure demand restated. SUSPECTS: none confirmed. RULE: first red-enacted gov => narrow pres/chc/unlucky via hand-claims vs ledger (works without dead doctrine). R4 PREVIEW: pres=Ines; term limits bar Rosa+Ines as nominees; I eligible, pre-signed. NEXT: force R3 chain closure; mismatch/silence => permanent Nein on Rosa/Ines govs; Ja pledge keyed ONLY to complete+matching disclosure.

bid round 3252s

ROLE Lib. R1 Boris/me: bins F+F -> L. R2 me/Rosa: drew F,L,F; bin F, pass L+F; Rosa enact L bin F. AUDIT: 4 named-F bins (Boris R1, me R1, me R2, Rosa R2); R3 Rosa/Ines -> L. Board L3/F0, trk 0/3, draw 8/discard 6. LEDGER LOCK NOW UNANIMOUS: Marek's lock + my retraction + Boris t123 repair (6L printed, 3 enacted, <=3L off-board; non-board 14 = 3L/11F). Arithmetic thread CLOSED, no relitigation. PENDING: Rosa R3 owes 3 named cards draw-order + discard positions + bin colors + mesh vs Greta t7/t41. Ines R3 owes pair + bin color + R4 lean AND fallback (Greta t60/t86, endorsed t114). Consequence keyed: complete+matching -> conditional Ja; silent/mismatch -> permanent Nein on Rosa/Ines govs. Pavel: sole unsigned 9/10, authored seating mech, self-slotted x2 behind Ines, JA anyway (Boris t78, Greta t48, me t122). Otto: soft-declined slate, counter-demands only. Tomas: late pledge t99. POINTS MADE (no repeat): Pavel unsigned/self-slot; sig-transfer; ballot rule; Tomas late pledge; Otto decline; R2 hand F-L-F/bin F/pass L+F; mesh-lock; self-offer R4 fallback; pre-signed pkg t114; retraction+scenarios+closure demand; THIS TURN: unanimity declared, final obligation checklist, Ja/Nein keys restated w/ consequences. SUSPECTS: none confirmed. RULE: first red-enacted gov => narrow pres/chc/unlucky via hand-claims vs ledger. R4 PREVIEW: pres=Ines; term limits bar Rosa+Ines as nominees; I eligible, pre-signed. NEXT: await Rosa/Ines disclosures; verify mesh vs Greta t7/t41; enforce Ja/Nein keys; no new threads until chain closes.

bid round 3377s

ROLE Lib. R1 Boris/me bins F+F->L; R2 me/Rosa drew F,L,F, bin F, pass L+F, Rosa enact L bin F; R3 Rosa/Ines -> L. Board L3/F0, trk 0/3, draw 8, disc 6. NAMED-F BINS ON RECORD = 4: Boris R1, me R1, me R2, Rosa R2; only R3 pair unnamed. Otto t3 claim 'only two named (R2 pair)' FALSE - I corrected him, demanded he cite any retraction of the four namings (Boris reaffirmed R1 naming in t123 repair); if he cannot cite, his count is minted and he rises on my suspect list. Nadia t2 still hammering Marek arithmetic - noise; arithmetic thread CLOSED by unanimous lock (Marek lock + my retraction + Boris t123): 6L printed, 3 enacted, non-board 14 = 3L/11F. PENDING: Rosa owes R3 full hand - 3 cards, draw order, discard position, bin color - plus mesh vs Greta t7/t41; Ines owes pair + bin color + R4 lean AND fallback (Greta t60/t86, endorsed t114). KEYS: complete+matching -> conditional Ja on their govs; silent/mismatch -> permanent Nein. Pavel: sole unsigned 9/10, authored seating mech, self-slotted x2 behind Ines, JA anyway. Otto prior: soft-declined slate, counter-demands only. Tomas: late pledge t99. SUSPECTS: none confirmed; watch Otto (count falsification), Pavel (unsigned+self-slot). RULE: first red-enacted gov => narrow pres/chc/unlucky via hand-claims vs ledger. R4 PREVIEW: pres=Ines; term limits bar Rosa+Ines as nominees; I eligible, pkg pre-signed t114. POINTS MADE (no repeat): Pavel unsigned/self-slot; sig-transfer; ballot rule; Tomas late pledge; Otto decline; R2 hand F-L-F/bin F/pass L+F; mesh-lock; self-offer R4 fallback; pre-signed pkg t114; retraction+closure demand; unanimity declared; obligation checklist; Ja/Nein keys; THIS TURN: Otto count correction 4-not-2 + retract-or-cite demand. NEXT: await Rosa/Ines disclosures; verify mesh; hold Otto to retract-or-cite; no new threads until chain closes.

speak round 3393s

The live dispute this window is the discard ledger: Lena claimed four-of-six bins named Fascist (minted), Marek corrected to two, Otto t45 noted Marek's 3L/5F lock silently assumes both R1 bins were red. I am one of the two R1 holders (I was R1 President). Nobody can check my R1 hand, and R1's vote passed so the government definitely drew — claiming is mechanically safe. I'll declare a statistically modal, self-consistent hand (Liberal-Fascist-Fascist, bin the Fascist, pass L+F, which yields Lena enacting the Liberal exactly as recorded): this converts half of Marek's contested assumption into on-record fact, defuses Otto's cynicism line, and creates a forcing constraint on Lena — if she claims her R1 bin was Liberal or that she received L+L, she contradicts my named pass. New content, not a repeat; Greta already owns the Rosa/Ines R3 chase, so I leave that to her.

ROLE Lib. R1 Boris/me: Boris drew L,F,F, bin F, pass L+F; I enact L, bin F. R2 me/Rosa: drew F,L,F, bin F, pass L+F, Rosa enact L bin F. R3 Rosa/Ines -> L; R3 bins STILL UNNAMED. Board L3/F0 trk0/3 draw8 disc6. NAMED-F BINS=4: Boris R1 (t53 this win), me R1 (re-affirmed this win), me R2, Rosa R2. Unknowns left: R3 two bins + draw8 = 7F/3L; if R3 bins both F -> draw locks 3L/5F (Marek's lock now owner-backed). OTTO: t45 'only two named (R2 pair)' FALSE + called my premise 'minted' -- OWES retract-or-cite; prior soft-declined slate, counter-demands only; rising suspect if he can't cite. NADIA: t39 'rulebook prints eleven liberals' FLIPS real deck (6L/11F) -- flagged this win; watch motive (cheapens future forced-red excuses, smears Marek). PENDING: Rosa full R3 hand (3 drawn, bin color instant-name, mesh vs Ines pair per her t41 lock); Ines owes pair + bin color + R4 lean AND fallback (Greta t60/t86, re-asked t7 this win). KEYS: complete+matching -> Ja on their govs; silent/mismatch -> permanent Nein. PAVEL: sole unsigned 9/10, authored seating mech, self-slotted x2 behind Ines, voted Ja anyway -- press later. TOMAS: pledge landed late (prev win t99). RULE: first red-enacted gov => narrow pres/chc/unlucky via hand-claims vs ledger. R4 PREVIEW: pres Ines; term limits bar Rosa+Ines as nominees; I eligible, pkg pre-signed t114, offered as fallback. POINTS MADE (do not repeat): Pavel unsigned/self-slot; sig-transfer; Tomas late pledge; Otto slate-decline; my R2 hand F-L-F/bin F/pass L+F; mesh-lock; R4 self-offer; pkg t114; unanimity declared; obligation checklist; Ja/Nein keys. THIS TURN: R1 hand re-disclosure killing Otto's 'minted' + Nadia deck-flip callout. NEXT: hold Otto to retract-or-cite; await Rosa/Ines chain closure; verify mesh; no new threads until chain closes.

bid round 3198s

ROLE Lib. MESH CLOSED: Boris t127 R1 hand L,F,F/binF/pass L+F == my receipt+enactment -> R1 double-signed; Otto 'minted' buried unless he cites. NAMED-F BINS=4 (owner-signed): Boris R1, me R1, me R2, Rosa R2. DRAW RANGE (stated pub): always majority-F -- 5F/3L if both R3 bins red (=Marek lock), 6F/2L split, 7F/1L neither. OPEN DEMANDS: Rosa R3 full hand (3 drawn colors + bin color); Ines R3 pair colors + bin color + R4 lean w/ fallback (Greta asked before, unanswered). OTTO: owes retract-or-cite ('minted'); earlier declined slate, counter-demands only -> rising suspect. NADIA: t39 'rulebook prints eleven liberals' FALSE (real 6L/11F) -- cite-or-retract demanded this turn; fake count = standing red-bin alibi, smears Marek. PAVEL: sole unsigned Ja x3, authored seating mech, self-slotted behind Ines -- Boris pressing now; hold my fire till R3 closes. TOMAS: late pledge prev-win t99, low pri. RULES: complete+matching gov -> Ja; silent/mismatch -> Nein. First red-enacted gov => pin pres/chc/unlucky via hand claims vs ledger. R4 PREVIEW: pres Ines, term limits bar Rosa+Ines as nominees; I eligible, pkg pre-signed t114, offered fallback. NEXT: await Rosa/Ines numbers, verify R3 mesh (Rosa pass == Ines receipt), then close chain; no new threads till then. POINTS MADE (no repeat): Pavel unsigned/self-slot; sig-transfer; Tomas late pledge; Otto slate-decline; my R1+R2 hands; mesh-lock; R4 self-offer; pkg t114; unanimity; checklist; Ja/Nein keys; draw-range math; Nadia callout; Otto bury.

bid round 3188s

ROLE Lib. MESH: R1 double-signed (Boris L,F,F/binF/passLF == my receipt). R2 signed (me LFF/binF/passLF == Rosa receipt). R3 HALF-CLOSED: Ines t=1 recv LF/binF/enactL; awaiting Rosa triple+bin. NAMED RED BINS=5 pending Rosa confirm: BorisR1, meR1, meR2, RosaR2, InesR3. DRAW MATH UPDATED this turn: Ines red bin KILLS 7F/1L branch -> draw pile is 6F/2L (if Rosa bins L) or 5F/3L (if Rosa bins F); majority-F guaranteed, >=5 reds/8. PAVEL signed full pkg t=3 -> ALL Ja-voters now signed (he was sole unsigned). OPEN DEBTS: Rosa R3 triple+bin (Pavel t=2 also pressed); Nadia t39 'rulebook prints eleven liberals' FALSE - cite-or-retract, no answer yet; Otto 'minted' retract-or-cite + declined slate, counter-demands only -> rising suspect; Ines R4 lean+fallback (Greta asked, unanswered) - I co-pressed this turn. TOMAS late pledge prev-win t99, low pri. RULES: complete+matching gov->Ja; silent/mismatch->Nein. First red-enacted gov -> pin pres/chc/unlucky via hand claims vs ledger. R4 PREVIEW: pres Ines; term limits bar Rosa+Ines as nominees; I eligible, pkg pre-signed t114, fallback offered. NEXT: Rosa's two numbers close the whole chain; then chase Nadia/Otto debts; watch Otto's response pattern. SAID (no repeat): Pavel unsigned/self-slot; sig-transfer; Tomas late pledge; Otto slate-decline; my R1+R2 hands; mesh-lock; R4 self-offer; pkg t114; unanimity; checklist; Ja/Nein keys; draw-range math v1; Nadia callout; Otto bury; branch-kill update; Pavel milestone; Rosa closing condition.

bid round 3253s

ROLE Lib. LEDGER CLOSED: all 6 bins owner-confirmed red (BorisR1, meR1, meR2, RosaR2 [certain-I dealt her the LF], RosaR3 t1/t2, InesR3) + 3 enacted L => draw pile 8L/0F until reshuffle. TRIPWIRE PROPOSED aloud: any pre-reshuffle gov reporting a drawn red = confessed hand-lie, pin pres+chc by name, demand full hand detail. ROSA CONTRADICTION: confirms both R3 bins red (t1,t2) THEN claims pile ~2:1 red — impossible; certainty floor from my own attestations (meR1, meR2, RosaR2): even if BorisR1/RosaR3/InesR3 bins were secretly blue, pile min 5L/3F, never 2:1 red. Demanded Rosa reconcile card-by-card vs 6 red bins + 3 enacted L. WATCH: does Rosa retract, recompute, or double down (=seeding cover for future red hand-lie — prime suspect signal). OPEN DEBTS: Nadia 'rulebook prints eleven liberals' cite-or-retract, unanswered; Otto 'minted' retract-or-cite + declined slate, counter-demands only, rising suspect; Ines R4 lean+fallback (Greta asked, unanswered). PAVEL signed full pkg t=3 -> ALL Ja-voters signed. RULES: complete+matching gov->Ja; silent/mismatch->Nein. First red-enacted gov -> pin via hand claims vs ledger. R4 PREVIEW: pres Ines; term limits bar Rosa+Ines as nominees; I eligible, pkg pre-signed t114, fallback offered. NEXT: Rosa's reconciliation response; then chase Nadia/Otto debts; watch Otto's response pattern; any gov reporting red pre-reshuffle -> immediate pin. SAID (no repeat): Pavel unsigned/self-slot; sig-transfer; Tomas late pledge; Otto slate-decline; my R1+R2 hands; mesh-lock; R4 self-offer; pkg t114; unanimity; checklist; Ja/Nein keys; draw-range v1; Nadia callout; Otto bury; branch-kill; Pavel milestone; Rosa closing condition; ledger-close + certainty-floor + Rosa contradiction + tripwire (this turn).

bid round 3346s

ROLE Lib. DECK CANON ASSERTED: 17 cards = 11L/6F (same page as 5L/6F win lines). LEDGER CLOSED: 6 bins owner-named red (BorisR1, meR1, meR2, RosaR2 [I dealt her LF-mate], RosaR3, InesR3) + 3 enacted L => pile 8L/0F if bins honest. MECHANICAL PIN (testimony-free): 3 reds in discard via my own hands (binned meR1, meR2; dealt RosaR2 mate) => pile reds <=3 ALWAYS, floor 5L/3F. BORIS AXIOM REFUTED (said): his '6L printed' => 11 reds off-board vs 6 printed — fails own citation std; Nadia 8/0 = forced remainder, vindicated. Boris t3 '5 of next 8 red' impossible + pre-excuse for future red report — flagged. TRIPWIRE LIVE: any pre-reshuffle gov reporting drawn red = confessed hand-lie => pin pres+chc by name, demand full hand detail. OPEN DEBTS: Rosa card-by-card reconciliation (re-pinged, owed vs ceiling <=3 reds); Nadia rulebook-cite (Boris pressing); Otto ledger-flip t27->t45 retract-or-cite + declined slate (Boris pressing); Ines R4 lean+fallback (Greta asked, unanswered). WATCH: Boris concede vs double-down on axiom (broken-axiom auditor = suspect); Otto response pattern; Rosa silence = signal. R4 PREVIEW: pres Ines; nominees bar Rosa+Ines; I eligible, pkg pre-signed t114, fallback offered. RULES: complete+matching gov -> Ja; silent/mismatch -> Nein. SAID (no repeat): Pavel unsigned/self-slot; sig-transfer; Tomas late pledge; Otto slate-decline; my R1+R2 hands; mesh-lock; R4 self-offer; pkg t114; unanimity; checklist; Ja/Nein keys; draw-range v1; Nadia callout; Otto bury; branch-kill; Pavel milestone; Rosa closing condition; ledger-close; certainty-floor 5L/3F; Rosa contradiction 2:1; tripwire; boris-axiom-reductio; nadia-vindication; mechanical-3-pin; pile-ceiling<=3; boris-t3-preexcuse; rosa-debt-reping.

bid round 3106s

ROLE Lib. DECK CANON ASSERTED: 17=11L/6F. MECHANICAL PIN (testimony-free): 3 reds off-pile via my own hands (binned meR1, meR2; dealt RosaR2 LF-mate) => pile reds <=3 ALWAYS, floor 5L/3F; if all bins honest => pile 8L/0F. LEDGER CLOSED: 6 owner-named red bins (BorisR1, meR1, meR2, RosaR2[mate mine], RosaR3, InesR3) + 3 enacted L. TRIPWIRE LIVE: any pre-reshuffle gov reporting drawn red = confessed hand-lie => pin pres+chc by name, demand full hand detail (note: such lie does NOT break my reds<=3 pin — mine-based). OPEN DEBTS: Rosa card-by-card reconciliation (re-pinged twice, owed vs <=3 ceiling); Nadia rulebook-cite (Boris pressing); Otto ledger-flip t27->t45 retract-or-cite + declined slate (Boris pressing); Ines R4 lean+fallback (Greta asked, unanswered). WATCH: Boris concede vs double-down axiom (broken-axiom auditor = suspect); Otto response pattern; Rosa silence = signal. R4 PREVIEW: pres Ines; nominees barred Rosa+Ines; I eligible; pkg pre-signed t114, fallback offered. RULES STANDING: complete+matching gov => Ja; silent/mismatch => Nein. SAID (NO REPEAT): Pavel unsigned/self-slot; sig-transfer; Tomas late pledge; Otto slate-decline; my R1+R2 hands; mesh-lock; R4 self-offer; pkg t114; unanimity; checklist; Ja/Nein keys; draw-range v1; Nadia callout; Otto bury; branch-kill; Pavel milestone; Rosa closing condition; ledger-close; certainty-floor 5L/3F; Rosa contradiction 2:1; tripwire; boris-axiom-reductio; nadia-vindication; mechanical-3-pin; pile-ceiling<=3; boris-t3-preexcuse; rosa-debt-reping. T4 DECISION: silent — all material on record, debts assigned to named owners, nothing new without repetition.

bid round 3211s

ROLE Lib. DECK CANON 17=11L/6F. PIN (testimony-free): 3 reds off-pile via my hands (meR1, meR2, RosaR2 mate) => pile reds<=3 ALWAYS, floor 5L/3F; all bins honest => 8L/0F. LEDGER CLOSED: owner-named red bins (BorisR1, meR1, meR2, RosaR2[mate mine], RosaR3, InesR3) + 3 enacted L. TRIPWIRE LIVE: pre-reshuffle gov reporting a drawn red = confessed hand-lie => pin pres+chc by name, demand full hand detail (does NOT break pin, mine-based). HOLD LAST INTERRUPT TOKEN for tripwire response. OPEN DEBTS: Rosa card-by-card reconciliation (re-pinged x2, owed vs <=3 ceiling); Nadia rulebook-cite (Boris pressing); Otto ledger-flip t27->t45 retract-or-cite + declined slate (Boris pressing); Ines R4 lean+fallback (Greta asked, unanswered). R4: pres Ines; barred Rosa+Ines; eligible: me, Boris, Greta, Marek, Otto, Pavel, Tomas, Nadia. PLEDGES: Boris instant-Ja{me,Greta,Marek,self}, standing-Nein{Tomas,Pavel,Otto,Nadia} until files clear, expires at naming; Marek Ja-whomever; Pavel full-pkg sig t88 + Tomas sig t99 (per Greta) => RETIRE my 'pavel-unsigned'/'tomas-late' flags, pending my own read of transcripts; my pkg pre-signed t114. NEW POINT QUEUED: endorse Greta's narrowing — Boris block shrinks to Otto+Nadia only; tell Ines safe slate is wide (anyone but Otto/Nadia clears today under my checklist). RULES STANDING: complete+matching gov => Ja; silent/mismatch => Nein (Otto, Nadia currently Nein-side). SAID (NO REPEAT): pavel-unsigned-flag, sig-transfer, tomas-late-pledge, otto-slate-decline, my-R1+R2-hands, mesh-lock, R4-self-offer, pkg-t114, unanimity, checklist, ja/nein-keys, draw-range-v1, nadia-callout, otto-bury, branch-kill, pavel-milestone, rosa-closing-cond, ledger-close, certainty-floor-5L/3F, rosa-contradiction-2:1, tripwire, boris-axiom-reductio, nadia-vindication, mechanical-3-pin, pile-ceiling<=3, boris-t3-preexcuse, rosa-debt-reping. WATCH: Boris concede-vs-double-down (broken-axiom auditor = suspect); Otto response pattern; Rosa silence = signal; Ines naming imminent — clock shuts at pick.

bid round 3529s

ROLE Lib. DECK CANON 17=11L/6F. PIN (testimony-free): 3 reds off-pile via my hands (meR1, meR2, RosaR2 mate) => pile reds<=3 ALWAYS, floor 5L/3F; all bins honest => 8L/0F. LEDGER CLOSED: owner-named red bins (BorisR1, meR1, meR2, RosaR2[mate mine], RosaR3, InesR3)+3 enacted L. TRIPWIRE LIVE: pre-reshuffle gov reporting drawn red = confessed hand-lie => pin pres+chc by name, demand full hand detail. HOLD LAST INTERRUPT TOKEN for tripwire response. DEBTS: Rosa card-by-card recon (re-pinged x2); Nadia rulebook-cite (Boris pressing); Otto t27->t45 flip retract-or-cite + declined slate (Boris pressing); Ines R4 lean+fallback (Greta asked, silent); Marek owes basis for "reds ahead" — Nadia t1: 6 named bins exhaust 6 printed F => rulebook leaves 8-0, so 3-over-5 derivable from neither; Marek must ID which named bin lies or drop figure. SPOKE THIS TURN: endorsed Greta narrowing => Boris block = Otto+Nadia only; told Ines safe slate wide — me/Boris/Greta/Marek/Pavel/Tomas all clear under checklist (Pavel sig t88, Tomas sig t99 per Greta, pending my transcript read); Otto/Nadia stay Nein-side till files clear; warned failed vote feeds tracker toward auto-policy. R4: pres Ines; barred Rosa+Ines; eligible: me,Boris,Greta,Marek,Otto,Pavel,Tomas,Nadia. PLEDGES: Boris instant-Ja{me,Greta,Marek,self}, standing-Nein{Tomas,Pavel,Otto,Nadia} expires at naming; Marek Ja-whomever; my pkg pre-signed t114. RULES STANDING: complete+matching gov => Ja; silent/mismatch => Nein (Otto,Nadia Nein-side). SAID NO REPEAT: pavel-unsigned-flag, sig-transfer, tomas-late-pledge, otto-slate-decline, my-R1+R2-hands, mesh-lock, R4-self-offer, pkg-t114, unanimity, checklist, ja/nein-keys, draw-range-v1, nadia-callout, otto-bury, branch-kill, pavel-milestone, rosa-closing-cond, ledger-close, certainty-floor-5L/3F, rosa-contradiction-2:1, tripwire, boris-axiom-reductio, nadia-vindication, mechanical-3-pin, pile-ceiling<=3, boris-t3-preexcuse, rosa-debt-reping, greta-narrowing-endorse, tracker-fail-risk. WATCH: Ines pick imminent (clock shuts at naming); Otto response pattern; Rosa silence=signal; Boris concede-vs-double-down (broken-axiom auditor=suspect).

speak round 4407s

Open floor as incoming President. Best move: close Greta's still-open ask (my R4 lean+fallback) by publicly naming the slate NOW — Marek first, Pavel behind. This starts Boris's conditional-Ja clock, locks a likely-passing coalition (Boris instant-Ja + Marek pre-spent), and prevents another stall window. Marek is the safest pick: he's the table's loudest auditor (cover for me), his ballot is pre-spent, and naming a liberal-asset reads as liberal behavior. Pavel as fallback matches the mechanism he authored (slotted second behind me twice on record) — consistent story, no new exposure. I stay OUT of the Nadia-vs-Boris/Marek arithmetic war entirely: outcomes-not-arithmetic is already on record, and the true deck math (6L/11F printed, 3 enacted, 6 named red bins -> 3L/5F live) actually favors fascists via the reds-live narrative Boris is pushing — I let him own it. After the remark, formal nomination and vote. If it passes I read the actual draw before claiming anything, per doctrine.

ROLE Lib. DECK CANON 17=11L/6F. PIN (testimony-free): 3 reds off-pile via my hands (meR1 bin, meR2 bin, RosaR2-mate mechanically forced F) => pile reds<=3 ALWAYS, floor 5L/3F; all six named bins honest => 8L/0F. TRIPWIRE LIVE: pre-reshuffle gov reporting drawn red = confessed hand-lie => pin pres+chc by name, demand full hand detail. HOLD LAST INTERRUPT TOKEN for tripwire response. LEDGER: named red bins x6 (BorisR1, meR1, meR2, RosaR2mate[mine], RosaR3, InesR3)+3 enacted L. R3 mesh closed (Rosa t93 FFL/binF/pass LF = Ines t76). DECK-CANON SPLIT: Boris/Marek/Greta push 6L/11F => '3L/5F legit reds ahead'; Nadia+canon => 8-0. Marek's 3-5 derivable ONLY from phantom 6/11 print. Marek OWES: name which of six owner-named bins lies, or drop figure (Nadia t30 pressing; my older asks unanswered). Otto OWES: t27->t45 flip retract-or-cite + declined slate (Boris pressing). Nadia OWES: rulebook cite / Boris binary. R4: pres Ines; slate NAMED t38: Marek first, Pavel fallback. Barred Rosa+Ines. MY MOVE THIS WINDOW: pledged Ja on Marek gov (t29 precommit + clean record), asked Marek one-line full-package confirm; pressed Otto+Nadia commit-Ja-or-name-disqualifier (tracker 0/3, fail feeds auto-policy). PLEDGES: Boris instant-Ja{me,Greta,Marek,self}, standing-Nein{Tomas,Pavel,Otto,Nadia} expires at naming (Greta: Pavel/Tomas cleared via t88/t99 sigs). Marek Ja-whomever. My pkg pre-signed t114. RULES STANDING: complete+matching gov => Ja; silent/mismatch => Nein (Otto,Nadia Nein-side until files clear). SAID NO REPEAT: pavel-unsigned-flag, sig-transfer, tomas-late-pledge, otto-slate-decline, my-R1+R2-hands, mesh-lock, R4-self-offer, pkg-t114, unanimity, checklist, ja/nein-keys, nadia-callout, otto-bury, branch-kill, rosa-closing-cond, ledger-close, certainty-floor-5L/3F, rosa-contradiction-2:1, tripwire, boris-axiom-reductio, nadia-vindication, mechanical-3-pin, pile-ceiling<=3, boris-t3-preexcuse, rosa-debt-resolved(t93), greta-narrowing-endorse, tracker-fail-risk, marek-gov-ja-pledge, otto-nadia-flip-press. WATCH: Otto/Nadia ballot behavior (Nein here = signal); Marek package-confirm line; Boris block expiry compliance; post-enact tripwire armed if any red lands; Rosa silent=signal; broken-axiom auditor suspect flag on 6/11-canon pushers.

bid round 3192s

ROLE Lib. DECK CANON 17=11L/6F. PIN (testimony-free): 3 reds off-pile via my hands (meR1 bin, meR2 bin, RosaR2-mate mech-forced F) => pile reds<=3 ALWAYS, floor 5L/3F; all six named bins honest => pile 8L/0F. TRIPWIRE LIVE: any pre-reshuffle drawn red = confessed hand-lie somewhere => pin pres+chc by name, demand full hand detail. HOLD INTERRUPT TOKENS for tripwire/ballot surprise. LEDGER: named red bins x6 (BorisR1, meR1, meR2, RosaR2mate[mine], RosaR3, InesR3)+3 enacted L. R3 mesh closed (Rosa t93 FFL/binF/pass LF = Ines t76). DECK-CANON SPLIT: Boris/Marek/Greta push phantom 6L/11F ('3L/5F reds ahead'); Nadia+canon 8-0. Marek OWES: name which of six owner-named bins lies, or drop 3-5 figure (Nadia t30 pressing; my older asks unansw.). Otto OWES: t27->t45 flip retract-or-cite + declined slate (Boris pressing). Nadia OWES: rulebook cite / Boris binary. R4 GOV: pres Ines, chc Marek (slate named t38, Pavel fallback). Barred Rosa+Ines. MY STANCE: pledged Ja t29 (precommit+clean record); pkg pre-signed t114; asked Marek one-line full-package confirm -- WATCH his answer line. Pressed Otto+Nadia commit-Ja-or-name-disqualifier (tracker 0/3, fail feeds auto-policy). PLEDGES: Boris instant-Ja{me,Greta,Marek,self}, standing-Nein{Tomas,Pavel,Otto,Nadia} expires at naming (Greta: Pavel/Tomas cleared via t88/t99 sigs). Marek Ja-whomever. RULES STANDING: complete+matching gov => Ja; silent/mismatch => Nein (Otto,Nadia Nein-side until files clear). SAID NO REPEAT: pavel-unsigned-flag, sig-transfer, tomas-late-pledge, otto-slate-decline, my-R1+R2-hands, mesh-lock, R4-self-offer, pkg-t114, unanimity, checklist, ja/nein-keys, nadia-callout, otto-bury, branch-kill, rosa-closing-cond, ledger-close, certainty-floor-5L/3F, rosa-contradiction-2:1, tripwire, boris-axiom-reductio, nadia-vindication, mechanical-3-pin, pile-ceiling<=3, boris-t3-preexcuse, rosa-debt-resolved(t93), greta-narrowing-endorse, tracker-fail-risk, marek-gov-ja-pledge, otto-nadia-flip-press. WATCH: Otto/Nadia ballots (Nein here = signal); Marek confirm line; Boris block-expiry compliance; post-enact tripwire armed if any red lands; Rosa silent=signal; broken-axiom auditor suspect flag on 6/11-canon pushers; next rotation P4(Greta) pres, term-limit pair {Ines,Marek} barred as chc.

bid round 3279s

ROLE Lib. DECK CANON 17=11L/6F. PIN (testimony-free): 3 reds off-pile via my hands (meR1 bin, meR2 bin, RosaR2mate mech-forced F) => pile reds<=3 ALWAYS, floor 5L/3F; all six named bins honest => pile 8L/0F. TRIPWIRE LIVE: any pre-reshuffle drawn red = confessed hand-lie => pin pres+chc by name, demand full hand detail. HOLD interrupt tokens for tripwire/ballot surprise. LEDGER: named red bins x6 (BorisR1, meR1, meR2, RosaR2mate[mech], RosaR3, InesR3)+3 enacted L. R3 mesh closed (Rosa t93 FFL/binF/pass LF = Ines t76). CANON SPLIT UPDATE: Greta FLIPPED to 11/6 on record (this win t2: rulebook prints eleven-over-six; six named bins spend every fascist; no honest red this term). Phantom 6L/11F 'reds-ahead' now = Boris+Marek ONLY. Otto t1 pressing Marek: cite 6L print or adopt 11/6 (then no reds left to price) — aligned w/ me. R4 GOV: pres Ines, chc Marek. Barred: Rosa, Ines-as-chc. MY STANCE: Ja (pledge t29, pkg t114). Marek confirm-line STILL OUTSTANDING. OATH COLLECTION (Rosa t3): 3 unseen pres bins {BorisR1, meR2, RosaR3}. Rosa swore hers (F). I SWORE mine: R2 bin=Fascist, FFL hand, binned F, passed L+F (=> RosaR2mate mech-forced F, no oath needed). CALLED BORIS: owes R1-pres-bin oath — final unseen bin; once sworn, all 6 bins owner-backed, tripwire airtight. OWEES: Marek—name which of six owner-named bins lies or drop 3-5 reds-ahead figure (Nadia t30 + Otto t1 pressing; my older asks unansw.). Otto—t27->t45 flip retract-or-cite + declined slate (Boris pressing). Nadia—rulebook cite / Boris binary. Boris—R1 bin oath (NEW, mine). PLEDGES: Boris instant-Ja{me,Greta,Marek,self}, standing-Nein{Tomas,Pavel,Otto,Nadia} expires at naming (Pavel/Tomas cleared via t88/t99 sigs). Marek Ja-whomever. RULES STANDING: complete+matching gov=>Ja; silent/mismatch=>Nein (Otto,Nadia Nein-side until files clear). SAID NO REPEAT: pavel-unsigned-flag, sig-transfer, tomas-late-pledge, otto-slate-decline, my-R1+R2-hands, mesh-lock, R4-self-offer, pkg-t114, unanimity, checklist, ja/nein-keys, nadia-callout, otto-bury, branch-kill, rosa-closing-cond, ledger-close, certainty-floor-5L/3F, rosa-contradiction-2:1, tripwire, boris-axiom-reductio, nadia-vindication, mechanical-3-pin, pile-ceiling<=3, boris-t3-preexcuse, rosa-debt-resolved(t93), greta-narrowing-endorse, tracker-fail-risk, marek-gov-ja-pledge, otto-nadia-flip-press. WATCH: Otto/Nadia ballots (Nein=signal); Marek confirm line; Boris block-expiry + R1-oath compliance; post-enact tripwire armed; Rosa silent=signal; broken-axiom auditor suspect flag on 6/11 pushers (now Boris+Marek); next rotation P4(Greta) pres, term-limit pair {Ines,Marek} barred as chc.

bid round 4504s

ROLE Lib. DECK 17=11L/6F. PIN: 3 reds off-pile via my hands => draw pile reds<=3 always, floor 5L/3F; six honest bins => pile 8L/0F. TRIPWIRE LIVE: any drawn red pre-reshuffle = confessed hand-lie, pin pres+chc by name. LEDGER 6 red bins: BorisR1(t53 self-named), meR1(t61), meR2(my sworn oath), RosaR2mate(MECH: my L+F pass forces F, no oath possible), RosaR3(t93), InesR3(t76); +3 enacted L; R3 mesh closed. THIS WINDOW: answered Boris 4-vs-6 (his t=3): 5th bin=my R2 oath already on record, 6th=mechanical, no timestamps owed; demanded Boris ack - dodge=suspect signal. Boris t=2: Pavel/Tomas cleared via t88/t99 sigs, his Nein narrowed to {Otto,Nadia}, instant-Ja Marek. CANON 11/6 adopted: me+Greta(flip)+Otto-leaning; 6L/11F phantom pushers = Boris+Marek only. R4 GOV pres Ines/chc Marek; barred Rosa, Ines-as-chc; MY STANCE Ja (t29 pledge, t114 pkg). MAREK CONFIRM LINE STILL OUTSTANDING: adopt 11/6 or name which of six owner-backed bins lies, no third branch (Nadia t30, Otto t1, me x3). OWEES: Marek-confirm; Otto t27->t45 flip retract-or-cite + declined slate (Boris pressing); Boris-ack on 5th/6th bin resolution. RULES STANDING: complete+matching gov=>Ja; silent/mismatch=>Nein. SAID no-repeat: pavel-flag,sig-transfer,tomas-late,otto-slate,R4-self-offer,pkg-t114,unanimity,checklist,nadia-callout,otto-bury,branch-kill,rosa-closing,ledger-close,floor-5L/3F,rosa-contradiction,tripwire,axiom-reductio,nadia-vindication,mech-3-pin,pile-ceiling,boris-preexcuse,rosa-debt-done,greta-endorse,tracker-risk,marek-ja-pledge,flip-press,my-R1/R2-hands,mesh-lock. WATCH: Otto/Nadia ballots (Nein=signal), Marek confirm, Boris ack 4-vs-6, Rosa silence=signal, post-enact tripwire armed, next rotation P4 Greta pres + term-limit pair {Ines,Marek} barred chc.

speak round 4232s

Vote math favors a pass (Marek any-nominee Ja, Boris instant-Ja, Lena one-line condition, mine incoming), so no need to burn the window re-selling the nomination. Highest-value new contribution: extend Rosa's t21 oath gambit to its missing symmetric target. Rosa demanded Lena swear the unnamed R2 presidential bin while volunteering her own already-named R3 bin — zero-cost pressure designed so a refusal/hedge devalues 'named' bins and keeps live reds plausible (good for us long-term; bad outcome only if Lena cleanly swears red, acceptable cost). Pressing Boris on his R1 presidential bin is strictly win-win: he complies (nothing changes) or balks at a trivially safe oath (another named bin loses credibility). Crucially I reference ONLY Rosa's R3 offer and Boris's R1 bin — never Rosa's unnamed R2 chancellor bin, and never my/Ines's foundation bins. Stay fully out of the print-count and live-pile arithmetic war (Nadia vs Marek vs Greta vs Boris); broadcasting deck math is forbidden and siding visibly buys nothing. One remark, new target, then ballot Ja.

ROLE Lib. DECK 17=11L/6F CANON. PIN: 6 honest bins => pile 8L/0F pre-reshuffle; any bin secretly blue => >=1F live. TRIPWIRE ARMED: any drawn/enacted red pre-reshuffle = confessed hand-lie, pin pres+chc by name. LEDGER 6 bins: BorisR1(t53 F), meR1(t61 F), meR2(oath F, re-affirmed this window), RosaR2(MECH F via my L+F pass — AWAITING ROSA'S NAME = sole missing timestamp), RosaR3(t93 F), InesR3(t76 F); +3 enacted L; R3 mesh closed. THIS WINDOW: answered Rosa t21 directly (P2 oath=red); framed her R2 bin as last missing timestamp. OWEES: Rosa name R2 bin color (Nadia t56 + me); Marek adopt 11/6 or name which owner-backed bin lies (silent thru 4 presses: me x3, Otto t7, Greta t13); Boris ack 5th/6th bin resolution (his t41 4-vs-6); Otto t27->t45 flip retract-or-cite. SUSPECTS: Marek+Boris push 6L/11F phantom (Marek t29 reds-swallowed-as-deck-luck standard = fascist cover IF reds live; Boris t130 'legitimate reds ahead' pre-excuse); Otto ledger flip; Nadia impossible piles BOTH dirs (t51 4/7, t109 8/0) — chaos or cover. WATCH Otto/Nadia ballots: Nein=signal. R4 GOV pres Ines/chc Marek; MY STANCE Ja (pledged t29+t43; standing rule: complete+matching gov=>Ja). Term-limit note: if passed, R5 pres=Greta, chc-barred={Ines,Marek}, Rosa eligible again. WATCH: Rosa silence on R2 bin=signal; Marek confirm pre-ballot; post-enact tripwire; tracker 0/3 failed votes feed top-deck (harmless if pile truly 8L/0F). SAID(no-repeat): pavel-flag,sig-transfer,tomas-late,otto-slate,R4-offer,pkg-t114,unanimity,checklist,nadia-callout,otto-bury,branch-kill,rosa-closing,ledger-close,floor-5L3F,tripwire,axiom-reductio,nadia-vindication,mech-3-pin,pile-ceiling,boris-preexcuse,greta-endorse,tracker-risk,marek-ja,flip-press,my-R1/R2-hands,mesh-lock,bins-decide,otto-retract-demand,rosa-oath-answer,missing-timestamp-frame

bid round 4199s

ROLE Lib. DECK 17=11L/6F CANON. PIN: 6 honest bins => pile 8L/0F pre-reshuffle; any bin secretly blue => >=1F live. TRIPWIRE ARMED: any red drawn/enacted pre-reshuffle = confessed hand-lie, pin liar by name. CLEAN WINDOW (SAID): 8 live cards = exactly R4+R5 draws; R6 reshuffles mid-draw. LEDGER 6 bins: BorisR1(t53 F; Pavel t1 oath-press live), meR1(t61 F), meR2(oath F, reaffirmed), RosaR2(MECH F via my L+F pass — AWAITING ROSA'S NAME; pressed by Nadia t56+t2, me x2), RosaR3(t93 F), InesR3(t76 F); +3 enacted L; R3 mesh closed. OWEES: Rosa name R2 bin color; Marek adopt 11/6 or name the lying bin (silent thru 4 presses: me x3, Otto t7, Greta t13); Boris ack 5th/6th-bin resolution (his t41 4-vs-6); Otto t27->t45 flip retract-or-cite (demand standing, unpressed this window). SUSPECTS: Marek+Boris phantom 6L/11F push (Marek t29 reds-as-deck-luck = cover IF reds live; Boris t130 legit-reds-ahead pre-excuse); Otto ledger flip; Nadia impossible piles BOTH dirs (t51 4/7, t109 8/0) — chaos or cover. WATCH Otto/Nadia ballots: Nein=signal. R4 GOV pres Ines/chc Marek; STANCE LOCKED Ja (pledged t29+t43; rule: complete+matching=>Ja). Vote = near-free info: worst case a red surfaces => tripwire names this pair. TERM NOTE (SAID): pass or fail, R5 pres=Greta (rotation fixed); chc-barred={Ines,Marek}; Rosa chc-eligible again => her bin answer doubles as vetting record for her next nom. WATCH: Rosa pre-ballot silence=signal; Marek confirm pre-ballot; post-enact tripwire; tracker 0/3 harmless while pile 8L/0F. SAID(no-repeat): pavel-flag,sig-transfer,tomas-late,otto-slate,R4-offer,pkg-t114,unanimity,checklist,nadia-callout,otto-bury,branch-kill,rosa-closing,ledger-close,floor-5L3F,tripwire,axiom-reductio,nadia-vindication,mech-3-pin,pile-ceiling,boris-preexcuse,greta-endorse,tracker-risk,marek-ja,flip-press,my-R1/R2-hands,mesh-lock,bins-decide,otto-retract-demand,rosa-oath-answer,missing-timestamp-frame,r5-preview,clean-window-countdown

bid round 4271s

ROLE Lib. DECK 17=11L/6F CANON (Greta t3 declares 11/6 operative print — ratify). PIN: 6 honest bins => pile 8L/0F pre-reshuffle; any bin secretly blue => >=1F live. TRIPWIRE ARMED: red drawn/enacted pre-reshuffle = confessed bin-lie, name liar. CLEAN WINDOW: 8 live = exactly R4+R5 draws; R6 reshuffle mid-draw. TWO HINGES (Greta t3, ratified by me): #1 my R2p oath-F (stands, timestamped); #2 Rosa R2c name — mechanically forced F (took my L+F, enacted L) but UNSAID. LEDGER 6 bins: BorisR1(t53 F), meR1(t61 F), meR2(oath F), RosaR2(MECH F, name owed), RosaR3(t93 F), InesR3(t76 F); +3 enacted L; R3 mesh closed. OWEES: Rosa say 'F' (pressed me x3 incl now, Nadia x2, Greta hinge-frame); Boris ack 5th/6th-bin resolution (t41 4-vs-6) OPEN; Otto t27->t45 flip retract-or-cite standing UNPRESSED this window; Marek 11/6 adoption subsumed by Greta print (closed-ish). MAREK t1/t2: declined Otto cite-or-adopt; Nadia t30 3-over-0 dead vs public 8-pile; t2 binds seat: received cards named on arrival, L off mixed pair, pres-half locked at rotation. SUSPECTS: Marek+Boris phantom 6L/11F push (cover IF reds live; Boris t130 legit-reds-ahead pre-excuse); Otto ledger flip; Nadia impossible piles BOTH dirs (t51 4/7, t109 8/0) — chaos/cover. WATCH Otto/Nadia ballots: Nein=signal. R4 GOV Ines/Marek: STANCE LOCKED Ja (pledged t29+t43; complete+matching=>Ja). Marek t2 clause + Ines t76 claim = most-audited gov; worst case tripwire fires and names bin-liar (Ines IS bin-owner R3c; Marek owns none). TERM: pass/fail R5 pres=Greta (rotation fixed); chc-barred={Ines,Marek}; Rosa chc-eligible again => her bin word doubles as vetting for that nom. WATCH: Rosa pre-ballot silence=signal; post-enact tripwire; tracker 0/3 harmless while pile 8L/0F. SAID(no-repeat): pavel-flag,sig-transfer,tomas-late,otto-slate,R4-offer,pkg-t114,unanimity,checklist,nadia-callout,otto-bury,branch-kill,rosa-closing,ledger-close,floor-5L3F,tripwire,axiom-reductio,nadia-vindication,mech-3-pin,pile-ceiling,boris-preexcuse,greta-endorse,tracker-risk,marek-ja,flip-press,my-R1/R2-hands,mesh-lock,bins-decide,otto-retract-demand,rosa-oath-answer,missing-timestamp-frame,r5-preview,clean-window-countdown,greta-two-hinges-ratify,rosa-forced-word,marek-t2-audit-fold,rosa-ballot-silence

bid round 469s

ROLE Lib. DECK 17=11L/6F CANON (Greta t3 11/6 operative print, ratified). PIN: 6 honest bins => pile 8L/0F pre-reshuffle; any bin secretly blue => >=1F live. TRIPWIRE ARMED: red drawn/enacted pre-reshuffle = confessed bin-lie, name liar. CLEAN WINDOW: 8 live = R4+R5 draws; R6 reshuffle mid-draw. TWO HINGES (Greta t3, ratified): #1 my R2p oath-F (stands, timestamped); #2 Rosa R2c mech-forced F, word owed. LEDGER 6 bins: BorisR1(t53 F), meR1(t61 F), meR2(oath F), RosaR2(MECH F, word owed), RosaR3(t93 F), InesR3(t76 F); +3 enacted L; mesh closed. OWEES: Rosa say 'F' (me x3, Nadia x2, Greta hinge-frame); Boris t41 4-vs-6 ack OPEN; Otto t27->t45 flip retract-or-cite pressed, unanswered. MAREK t1/t2 binds seat: cards named on arrival, L off mixed pair, pres-half rotation-locked. SUSPECTS: Marek+Boris phantom 6L/11F push (Boris t130 legit-reds-ahead pre-excuse); Otto ledger flip; Nadia impossible piles BOTH dirs (t51 4/7, t109 8/0) chaos/cover. R4 GOV Ines/Marek: STANCE LOCKED Ja (pledged t29+t43; complete+matching=>Ja). Most-audited gov; worst case tripwire fires, names bin-liar (Ines owns R3c bin; Marek owns none). Pavel t1 pressing Nadia+Otto as last undeclared ballots — matches my pre-commit-clause frame; no need to re-add. TERM: pass/fail R5 pres=Greta (rotation fixed); chc-barred={Ines,Marek}; Rosa chc-eligible again => her 'F' word doubles as vetting for that nom. WATCH: Rosa pre-ballot silence=signal; post-enact tripwire; tracker harmless @8L/0F pile. SAID(no-repeat): pavel-flag,sig-transfer,tomas-late,otto-slate,R4-offer,pkg-t114,unanimity,checklist,nadia-callout,otto-bury,branch-kill,rosa-closing,ledger-close,floor-5L3F,tripwire,axiom-reductio,nadia-vindication,mech-3-pin,pile-ceiling,boris-preexcuse,greta-endorse,tracker-risk,marek-ja,flip-press,my-R1/R2-hands,mesh-lock,bins-decide,otto-retract-demand,rosa-oath-answer,missing-timestamp-frame,r5-preview,clean-window-countdown,greta-two-hinges-ratify,rosa-forced-word,marek-t2-audit-fold,rosa-ballot-silence

bid failed: structured_output_error

bid failed: api_error_400

bid round 445s

ROLE Lib. DECK 17=11L/6F CANON (Greta t3 11/6 ratified). PIN: 6 honest bins => pile 8L/0F pre-reshuffle; any bin secretly blue => >=1F live. TRIPWIRE ARMED: red drawn/enacted pre-reshuffle = confessed bin-lie, name liar. CLEAN WINDOW: 8 live = R4+R5 draws; R6 reshuffle mid-draw. TWO HINGES (Greta t3 ratified): #1 my R2p oath-F stands timestamped; #2 Rosa R2c mech-forced F, word owed. LEDGER 6 bins: BorisR1(t53 F), meR1(t61 F), meR2(oath F), RosaR2(MECH F, word owed), RosaR3(t93 F), InesR3(t76 F); +3 enacted L; mesh closed. OWEES: Rosa say 'F' (me x3, Nadia x2, Greta hinge-frame); Boris t41 4-vs-6 ack OPEN; Otto t27->t45 retract-or-cite OPEN + Otto ballot still undeclared. MAREK t1/t2 binds seat: cards named on arrival, L off mixed pair, pres-half rotation-locked. SUSPECTS: Marek+Boris phantom 6L/11F push (Boris t130 legit-reds-ahead pre-excuse); Otto ledger flip; Nadia impossible piles BOTH dirs (t51 4/7 vs t109 8/0). R4 GOV Ines/Marek: STANCE LOCKED Ja (pledged t29+t43; complete+matching=>Ja). Most-audited gov; worst case tripwire fires => name bin-liar (Ines owns R3c bin; Marek owns none). Pavel pressed Nadia+Otto; Nadia t163 Ja LOCKED (resolves her side) — Otto sole open ballot. No repeat from me. TERM: pass/fail R5 pres=Greta (rotation fixed); chc-barred={Ines,Marek}; Rosa chc-eligible again => her 'F' word doubles as vetting for that nom. WATCH: Rosa pre-ballot silence=signal; post-enact tripwire; tracker harmless @8L/0F pile. SAID(no-repeat): pavel-flag,sig-transfer,tomas-late,otto-slate,R4-offer,pkg-t114,unanimity,checklist,nadia-callout,otto-bury,branch-kill,rosa-closing,ledger-close,floor-5L3F,tripwire,axiom-reductio,nadia-vindication,mech-3-pin,pile-ceiling,boris-preexcuse,greta-endorse,tracker-risk,marek-ja,flip-press,my-R1/R2-hands,mesh-lock,bins-decide,otto-retract-demand,rosa-oath-answer,missing-timestamp-frame,r5-preview,clean-window-countdown,greta-two-hinges-ratify,rosa-forced-word,marek-t2-audit-fold,rosa-ballot-silence

vote round 4254s

I pledged Ja at t43 contingent on Marek formally binding the package to his seat — he did at t75, matching Ines's carried signature. This is the most-audited pairing available: pre-committed before nomination, nine of ten ballots already declared Ja, tracker at 0/3 so a Nein buys nothing but risk. Downside is bounded by the tripwire: if all six bins hold, the live pile is 8L/0F and no red can honestly appear pre-reshuffle; worst case (Rosa's unnamed R2c bin secretly blue) at most one F is live, and any red this government touches instantly exposes which bin-claim was the lie. Breaking my own pledge would cost more credibility than any scenario recovers. Ja.

ROLE Lib. CANON DECK 11L/6F (Greta-ratified). PIN: 6 honest red bins => live pile 8L/0F pre-reshuffle; Rosa-bin-blue variant => 7L/1F (Otto t103). TRIPWIRE ARMED: any red drawn/enacted pre-reshuffle = confessed bin-lie; name liar + owning bin. HINGES: #1 my R2p oath-F CLOSED (t63 timestamped). #2 Rosa R2c bin = LAST unnamed card; word owed (me x3, Nadia t56+t96, Greta frame); Rosa silent through ballots. BINS: BorisR1p F(t53); meR1c F(t61); meR2p F(oath); RosaR3p F(t93); InesR3c F(t76); RosaR2c ??? . 3L enacted; mesh R1-R3 closed. VOTE LOG: R4 Ja cast (Ines-Marek; pledge t43 honored, Marek bound t75). 9/10 declared Ja; Rosa sole undeclared. SUSPECTS: phantom red-heavy pile cluster = Marek t23 6-blue print + Rosa t101 'reds nearly 2:1' (fits only dead 6-blue world, Otto t103) + Boris t115/t130 defending 3/5 ('legit reds ahead' pre-excuse). Otto flip t27->t45 still uncited/retracted (substance rehabbed by t103). Nadia piles messy both dirs but her 8/0 = correct under canon. NEXT-WINDOW: press Rosa for the R2c word 'F', tied to her t101 phantom-pile contradiction (fresh angle; don't duplicate Otto t103 wording); then demand post-enact chain-close (Ines triple+bin aloud, Marek pair aloud per signed clauses). TERM: R5 pres=Greta fixed either way; chc-barred {Ines,Marek}; Rosa chc-eligible again => her owed 'F' doubles as vetting for any R5 nom. WATCH: post-enact tripwire; Rosa continued silence on R2c = signal; reshuffle ~R6 mid-draw; tracker harmless while pile ~8/0. SAID(no-repeat): pavel-flag,sig-transfer,tomas-late,otto-slate,R4-offer,pkg-t114,unanimity,checklist,nadia-callout,otto-bury,branch-kill,rosa-closing,ledger-close,floor-5L3F,tripwire,axiom-reductio,nadia-vindication,mech-3-pin,pile-ceiling,boris-preexcuse,greta-endorse,tracker-risk,marek-ja,flip-press,my-R1/R2-hands,mesh-lock,bins-decide,otto-retract-demand,rosa-oath-answer,missing-timestamp-frame,r5-preview,clean-window-countdown,greta-two-hinges-ratify,rosa-forced-word,marek-t2-audit-fold,rosa-ballot-silence

bid round 4652s

ROLE Lib. CANON 11L/6F (Greta-ratified). R4 RED ENACTED (Ines-Marek) => canon 8L/0F DEAD unless bin-lie. FORK: (A) Rosa R2c=blue => pre-R4 pile 7L/1F => Ines triple forced {1R2B} => Marek HELD BLUE, PLAYED RED = condemned; only escape = claim pair RR => asserts 2nd red in pile => must name bin-liar. (B) Rosa R2c=red => liar in {BorisR1p t53, RosaR3p t93, InesR3c t76} (my bins closed: R1c t61, R2p oath t63). DEMANDED this window: Ines triple comp + discard color; Marek pair + discard + 'did you hold a blue'; Rosa R2c word. MESH: Marek pair must equal Ines triple minus Ines discard. PILE: pre-R4 8 cards, >=1R proven; post-R4 5 cards. Variant true => 5B/0R clean rest of game. Reshuffle ~R6 (draw 5->2->0). VOTE: R4 9/10 Ja declared; Rosa sole undeclared, silent ballots + silent R2c = top structural suspect. SUSPECTS: Marek (chose red under variant; t23 6-blue print phantom); Rosa (word owed x3+, t101 2:1 phantom); Ines R3c bin unverified - her triple report decides Marek; Boris t115/t130 'legit reds ahead' pre-excuse ALREADY SAID - only revisit if he spins R4. TERM: R5 pres=Greta fixed; chc-barred {Ines,Marek}; Rosa chc-eligible => owed word doubles as R5 vetting. TRIPWIRE FIRED R4 (pre-reshuffle red) - do not re-explain tripwire, cite firing only. SAID(no-repeat): pavel-flag,sig-transfer,tomas-late,otto-slate,R4-offer,pkg-t114,unanimity,checklist,nadia-callout,otto-bury,branch-kill,rosa-closing,ledger-close,floor-5L3F,tripwire,axiom-reductio,nadia-vindication,mech-3-pin,pile-ceiling,boris-preexcuse,greta-endorse,tracker-risk,marek-ja,flip-press,my-R1/R2-hands,mesh-lock,bins-decide,otto-retract-demand,rosa-oath-answer,missing-timestamp-frame,r5-preview,clean-window-countdown,greta-two-hinges-ratify,rosa-forced-word,marek-t2-audit-fold,rosa-ballot-silence,r4-red-fork,chain-close-demand,marek-no-escape,rosa-load-bearing-word

speak round 4549s

Greta's roll-call (t111) named me among undeclared; my scratchpad says I declared Ja locked last turn but it isn't visible in the transcript, so a single non-repetitive confirmation is cheaper than looking evasive on a direct call. Frame it with new content (Marek's t29 pre-nomination binding) rather than restating the lock. Do NOT touch the ledger war — Otto/Boris/Nadia/Greta are trading checkable arithmetic I can't profit from and could get caught in. Stay clean-lib: my file is shut (t99 signature, Boris narrowed his Nein off me), so keep it that way. Then go silent; vote Ja.

ROLE Lib. CANON 11L/6F (ratified). R4 RED enacted (Ines-Marek), first F, pre-reshuffle. FORK: (A) Rosa R2c=BLUE => pre-R4 7L/1F => triple must contain lone F => Ines passed mixed F+B => Marek enacted F over held B => BOTH condemned under Marek's own t29 clause; post-R4 pile 5L/0F clean until reshuffle (~R6). (B) Rosa R2c=RED => pre-R4 8L/0F => honest red impossible => liar in {Boris R1p t53, Rosa R3p t93, Ines R3c t76} + R4 accounts (my bins closed: R1c t61, R2p oath t63). OPEN DEMANDS: Ines R4 triple comp + bin color; Marek R4 pair + bin color; Rosa R2c word (owed since t56/t96 Nadia, my t63 frame). NEW THIS WINDOW: independent naming ORDER — Ines commits triple/bin BEFORE Marek names pair, else conformance kills mesh (pair must equal triple minus bin). Also collect both R4 bin colors to finish post-R4 ledger. VOTE: R4 10-0 Ja; Rosa sole undeclared ballot (silent Ja) + silent R2c => top structural suspect. SUSPECTS: Marek (t23 six-blue phantom print; t29 co-signed red-preexcuse standard; seat enacted the red); Ines (t38 slate picked Marek AFTER his t23/t29 record was public, skipping signed Lena/Pavel); Rosa (word owed x3, silent ballots); Boris t115/t130 'legit reds ahead' pre-excuse — revisit ONLY if he spins R4 hands. TERM: R5 pres=Greta fixed; chc-barred {Ines,Marek}; Rosa chc-eligible => her owed word doubles as R5 vetting. PILE: post-R4 5 cards; branch A true => 5L/0F rest of term. SAID(add independent-order-demand): pavel-flag,sig-transfer,tomas-late,otto-slate,R4-offer,pkg-t114,unanimity,checklist,nadia-callout,otto-bury,branch-kill,rosa-closing,ledger-close,floor-5L3F,tripwire-fired,axiom-reductio,nadia-vindication,mech-3-pin,pile-ceiling,boris-preexcuse,greta-endorse,tracker-risk,marek-ja,flip-press,my-R1/R2-hands,mesh-lock,bins-decide,otto-retract-demand,rosa-oath-answer,missing-timestamp-frame,r5-preview,clean-window-countdown,greta-two-hinges-ratify,rosa-forced-word,marek-t2-audit-fold,rosa-ballot-silence,r4-red-fork,chain-close-demand,marek-no-escape,rosa-load-bearing-word

bid round 4857s

ROLE Lib. CANON 11L/6F. R4 RED enacted (Ines-Marek), first F, pre-reshuffle. Pile pre-R4 = 8 cards (17-9 drawn). FORK: (A) Rosa R2c=BLUE => pre-R4 pile 7L/1F => triple must hold lone F. (B) Rosa R2c=RED => pre-R4 8L/0F => no honest red anywhere. NEW THIS WINDOW (t2/t3): Ines testified triple F-F-F, bin color STILL unnamed ('binned untouched'); Marek conformed red-red, claims 'no blue in hand', leans on Ines-first order. KILL SHOT: FFF impossible under BOTH branches (A: 1F in pile; B: 0F) => Ines account dead REGARDLESS of Rosa's word. Bin color she skipped can't revive a triple that couldn't exist. Marek's 'forced' inherits corpse: A => pair was F+B, he CHOSE red over blue; B => no honest red reached his hands. Mesh-too-perfect = coordination signature, not proof. ANTICIPATE ESCAPE: Inest/Marek inflate pile by calling an earlier bin-claim false (targets available w/o self-condemning: Boris t53 R1p, Rosa t93 R3p). Demand: name WHICH claim is false + show recount; 'deck ran rich' is not arithmetic. ROSA PRESSURE: her R2c word now SELECTS which story gets buried; every silent window she pays rent on Ines/Marek alibi. Owed since t56/t96/Nadia + my t63 frame. Doubles as R5 vetting (she is chc-eligible). GRETA (R5 pres, fixed): demand she name nominee HERE before acting; Rosa unelectable-to-me until R2c word lands. chc-barred {Ines,Marek}. SUSPECTS: Marek top (t23 six-blue phantom print; t29 co-signed red-preexcuse; seat enacted red; 'forced' defense now built on dead FFF). Ines co-top (impossible triple + skipped bin color + t38 slate picked Marek AFTER t23/t29 public, skipping signed Lena/Pavel). Rosa structural (sole undeclared ballot R4 + silent R2c x3 demands). Boris t115/t130 'legit reds ahead' pre-excuse — revisit only if he spins R4. MY CLOSED CLAIMS: R1c bin t61, R2p oath t63 — stand; anyone attacking them attacks a liberal's true ledger. PILE: post-R4 5 cards; branch A true => 5L/0F rest of term until reshuffle (~R6). SAID(add): fff-both-branch-kill, bin-color-still-owed, forced-inherits-corpse, rosa-rent-line, greta-prename-demand, recount-preempt

bid round 4198s

ROLE Lib. CANON 11L/6F. R4 RED enacted (Ines-Marek), first F; peek FIRED+resolved, disclosure pending (Boris t2/Otto t3 demand). Pile pre-R4 = 8 cards (17-9). FORK: (A) Rosa R2c=BLUE => pile 7L/1F, lone F; (B) RED => 8L/0F. FFF impossible BOTH branches. Ines bin color STILL unnamed = live trap: honest FFF bin is red, free to name; silence => bin blue => triple dies alone even before arithmetic. NUMBERS STATED ALOUD this window: A leaves exactly one red in 8, B leaves none. ESCAPE PREEMPT: if Ines calls an earlier bin-claim false (candidates: Boris t53 R1p, Rosa t93 R3p, mine t61/t63) demand WHICH one + full recount; 'deck ran rich' is not arithmetic. PEEK FRAME: target named => that player states true party on record SAME window. Peek can't revive dead FFF. Watch plays: peek partner/report Liberal (cover) vs peek liberal/report Fascist (burn). SAID this window: bin-red-free-to-name trap, both-branch counts, peek-target-speaks commitment, escape-recount demand, Greta prename demand, Rosa blacklist reaffirmed. GRETA = R5 pres fixed (rotation 0-1-2-3-4, no president-pick power live). Chancellor-barred: Ines, Marek. Rosa unelectable-to-me until R2c word lands (owed since t56/t96/Nadia ask + my t63 frame; silent x3+ windows). SUSPECTS: Marek top (t23 phantom six-blue print, t29 cosigned red-preexcuse, sat in R4 red gov, 'forced' defense built on dead FFF); Ines co-top (impossible triple, skipped bin color, t38 slate picked Marek AFTER t23/t29 public, skipped signed Lena/Pavel); Rosa structural (sole undeclared R4 ballot + R2c silence); Boris watch (t115/t130 'legit reds ahead') — revisit only if he spins R4. MY CLOSED CLAIMS stand: R1c bin (t61), R2p oath (t63); attacks on them = attacks on a liberal's true ledger. PILE post-R4: 5 cards; branch-A true => 5L/0F until reshuffle (~R6). NEXT: Ines answers peek w/o bin color -> press gap; names target -> force target statement same window; Greta dodges prename -> flag dodge publicly.

bid failed: structured_output_error

bid round 4189s

said: Pavel — Otto's final word is on the record: Ja, locked, print question or not. Nothing left to mine from him. Nadia owes you a ballot or a shrug; neither stalls the round. The bin debts keep their owners' names — they'll still be here after ballots. I call the vote once the floor settles.

ROLE Lib. CANON 11L/6F. R4 RED enacted (Ines-Marek), first F. Peek FIRED; Ines t1 claims peek=Greta/Liberal + R4 bin=FASCIST + triple FFF ('never a blue to hide'). TRAP SPRUNG: Ines finally named bin=F. CONTRADICTION vs stated numbers: branch A => exactly 1 red in pre-R4 8 (=the enacted F) => her bin necessarily BLUE — she hid a blue while the lone red went to Marek; branch B => 0 red => even the enactment impossible. FFF needs 3. DEMANDED: which earlier bin-claim she calls false (Boris t53 R1p / Rosa t93 R3p / mine t61+t63 / her own R3c discard) + full recount. If she escapes via 'Rosa lied' => force Rosa R2c color same window. MAREK DAMNED under A: handed F+L (only red available in pile), enacted F over L — a liberal chancellor bins the red. His t29 'forced' defense built on dead FFF. GRETA: demanded party-on-record this window; note peek-report exonerates nobody (reporting Liberal is the cover play for any president). SAID this window: bin-color collision with math, F-over-L point against Marek, escape-recount demand, Greta demand. DO NOT REPEAT. SUSPECTS: Ines co-top w/ Marek (impossible triple, late bin-name contradicting stated counts, picked Marek AFTER t23/t29, skipped signed Lena/Pavel); Marek top (t23 phantom six-blue print, t29 red-preexcuse, R4 F-over-L); Rosa structural (R2c silent x4+, sole undeclared R4 ballot); Boris watch only if he spins R4. MY CLOSED CLAIMS: R1c bin (t61), R2p oath (t63) = true ledger; attacks on them = attacks on a liberal. PILE post-R4: 5 cards; branch-A true => 5L/0F until reshuffle (~R6) => any near-term red exposes a liar. NEXT: Ines answers w/o naming the false claim => re-press with specific names; names one => full recount; Greta dodges => flag dodge publicly; watch Marek spin 'deck ran rich'.

speak round 4198s

New contribution available: split R4 into verified vs unverifiable. My received red-red pair independently confirms Ines's PASS claim, but her binned card is mechanically the only card of this government no other player saw — if her triple wasn't truly all-red, a blue died silently in her discard. Nobody has framed that exact hole yet (Greta spoke generally, Lena about conformity). Pair it with the still-unpaid peek debt and demand a Rosa-style bin oath, keeping pressure on Ines as my prime suspect without repeating my earlier deadline language. Avoid re-litigating Nadia (already rebutted), the print war arithmetic (my position is exposed and the recount anomaly makes public bin math unsafe), and don't repeat the chancellor-screening point.

ROLE Lib. CANON 11L/6F. R4 RED (Ines-Marek), first F. Peek FIRED; Ines t72: peek=Greta/Liberal + bin=F + triple FFF. GRETA STILL HASN'T CONFIRMED PEEK — owed, flag dodge if silent. Reporting Liberal = cover play, exonerates nobody. LEDGER FORK (public): 5 owner-backed red bins pre-R4 (Boris R1p t53, my R1c t61, my R2p t63, Rosa R3p t93, Ines R3c t76) => <=1 F in pre-R4 8-pile. Case i Rosa R2c=F: pile all-liberal, NO red enactable — both R4 testimonies fabricated. Case ii R2c=L: 7L+1F, Ines max 1 F — red-red pass IMPOSSIBLE; best case Marek held F+L and enacted F over L (liberal chancellor bins the red). Either way Ines's FFF/bin story false. She NEVER named which bin she calls false — evasion called out publicly this window. SAID this window (do NOT repeat): bin-collision math, F-over-L vs Marek, escape-recount demand, Greta demand, NEW: Ines's evasion + seating t29-alibi-author Marek first over signed clean-file Pavel/me. SUSPECTS: Ines & Marek co-top (impossible triple; his t23 phantom six-blue print, t29 red-pre-excuse, 'no veto exists' spin — veto irrelevant if a blue was in hand; her nomination choice). Rosa structural: R2c unnamed despite presses t21/t56/t96, sole undeclared R4 ballot pre-vote. Watch Boris spinning R4. MY CLOSED CLAIMS: R1c bin (t61), R2p oath (t63) = TRUE; attacks on them = attacks on a liberal. PILE post-R4: 5 cards. Case ii w/ enacted lone F => 5L/0F till ~R6 reshuffle; if Ines never drew the F => 4L/1F. Any near-term red exposes a liar. NEXT: Ines names a false bin => full recount, test consistency; escapes via 'Rosa lied' => force Rosa R2c color same window; Greta dodges peek confirm => flag publicly; Marek spins 'deck ran rich' => cite 5-card pile, 1 F max.

speak round 4114s

Marek's t65 ask is direct and answerable: pay the peek (target+result) and swear the bin red under Rosa's oath format. Both are safe for me — the truth here protects me: I drew RRR, binned a red, and Greta is genuinely Liberal so her confirm should land. Answering him specifically closes my file while redirecting the only remaining open confirmation onto Greta. No new accusations needed; Boris-Greta infight stays untouched. Keep it to two sentences, no repeats of prior windows.

ROLE Lib. CANON 11L/6F. R4 RED (Ines-Marek), first F. Peek fired: Ines t72 claims target=Greta, saw Liberal, binned F, triple FFF. KEY OPEN: GRETA UNCONFIRMED PEEK — I put confirm/deny on her directly this window; silence = open her file publicly next turn. Peek=Liberal exonerates nobody; convenient cover choice. LEDGER FORK: 5 owner-backed red bins pre-R4 (Boris R1p t53, my R1c t61, my R2p t63, Rosa R3p t93, Ines R3c t76). Case i Rosa R2c=F -> 0 F left in deck -> BOTH R4 testimonies fabricated. Case ii R2c=L -> <=1 F in pre-R4 pile -> Ines FFF impossible; best branch Marek held F+L and enacted F over L (confession), or he lied about the pair. Either way Ines's triple/bin story false unless she names an owner-backed bin as a lie — MINE ARE TRUE; she must implicate Boris or Rosa or fold. She never answered my t78 demand (standing). SAID this window (NO repeats): speaker-order audit demand, F-over-L option vs Marek, escape-recount demand, Greta demand v1, Ines evasion callout, seating t29-alibi-author Marek over signed Pavel/me, NEW: Greta confirm-or-deny + her clean-verdict skipped the one ownable fact. SUSPECTS: Ines & Marek co-top (impossible FFF; his t23 phantom six-blue print, t29 pre-built red excuse, no-veto spin irrelevant if blue in hand). Rosa structural: R2c color unnamed despite presses t21/t56/t96; sole undeclared R4 ballot pre-vote. Greta: soft t30 verdict + peek dodge — escalate if silent. Watch Boris spinning R4. MY CLOSED CLAIMS: R1c bin (t61), R2p oath (t63) = TRUE; attacks on them = attacks on a liberal. PILE post-R4: 5 cards. Ines-true => 5L/0F till reshuffle; case ii => 4L/1F. Any near-term red convicts someone. NEXT: Greta silent => open her file; Ines names a false bin => recount against that owner's record; escapes via 'Rosa lied' => force Rosa R2c color same breath; Marek 'deck ran rich' => cite 5-card pile, <=1 F; log who defends Ines unprompted (pairing tell).

bid round 4524s

ROLE Lib. CANON 11L/6F. R4 RED (Ines-Marek), first F. Peek fired: Ines t72 claims target=Greta saw Liberal, binned F, triple FFF. GRETA: confirmed Liberal this window, peek matches, self-flagged liar-Ines caveat; file downgraded to consistent — peek exonerates nobody either direction. ARITHMETIC (Otto independently converged this window): FFF needs >=3F in pre-R4 8-pile => <=3 true red bins => >=2 of five owner-backed reds forged (three if R2c red). My R1c/R2p bins TRUE — Ines only spendable names: Boris R1p, Rosa R3p, plus Rosa unnamed R2c. NEW DEMANDS OUT THIS TURN: Boris reaffirm R1p red on record; Rosa reaffirm R3p red AND name R2c color (press #4; prior t21/t56/t96); Marek restate R4 pair under count — red-red locks him to impossible triple, red-blue = enacted-F-over-L confession, silence = worse branch. STANDING: Ines owes a named false bin (t78 + this window, unanswered twice). SAID (no repeats): speaker-order audit, F-over-L option vs Marek, escape-recount demand, Greta confirm v1 + ack v2, Ines evasion callout, seating/alibi-author Marek over Pavel/me, bin-prelock move, Marek pair-restatement, defender-tell warning. SUSPECTS: Ines+Marek co-top (FFF impossible; his t23 phantom six-blue print, t29 pre-built red excuse, no-veto spin moot if blue in hand). Rosa structural: R2c color unnamed, sole undeclared R4 ballot pre-vote. WATCH: anyone defending FFF arithmetic unprompted after Otto's count = pairing tell; Boris spinning R4. PILE post-R4: 5 cards. Ines-true => 5L/0F till reshuffle; case ii => 4L/1F. Any near-term red convicts someone. NEXT: Ines names a false bin => recount against that owner record; blames Rosa => force R2c color same breath; Marek claims deck-ran-rich => cite 5-card pile, <=1F; R5 pen = Greta, term limits block Ines+Marek; log who stays silent on the count.

bid round 4438s

ROLE Lib. CANON 11L/6F. R4 RED (Ines-Marek), first F. Peek fired: Ines claims Greta=Liberal, binned F, drew FFF; Greta confirmed Liberal, peek exonerates nobody. NEW HARD FLOOR (said this turn): R1 consumed 2F receipt-verified (Boris binned F, passed L+F to me; I binned F) + my R2p bin red (own hand) = 3F burned pre-R3; every Liberal round burns >=1F => >=4 consumed => <=2 left for Ines's draw => FFF impossible REGARDLESS of R2c color or Rosa R3p truth. Zero forgeries needed to prove. ROSA ESCALATED: t3 told Otto 'six owner-backed red bins still leave five fascists live' + 'triple needs zero forgeries' - bad math, implies 5 of 6 red bins forged incl. mine. DEMAND OUT: name the forged bins; naming mine = open liar. BORIS: complied, reaffirmed R1p L-F-F, matches my receipt; slight downgrade, still log R4 spin. NADIA: R2c fork stands (red => R3 FFL impossible; blue => FFF impossible), covered, no repeat. MAREK: owes pair restatement under count: red-red = locked to impossible triple; red-blue = enact-F-over-L confession; silence = worse branch. Reasked this turn. INES: owes named false bin (t78 + window, unanswered twice); if she blames Rosa => force R2c color same breath. SUSPECTS: Ines+Marek co-top (FFF impossible; Marek t23 phantom print, t29 pre-built excuse). ROSA RAISED: active bad-arithmetic defense of FFF, R2c unnamed since R2, sole undeclared R4 ballot pre-vote. WATCH: anyone defending five-live line after receipt anchor = pairing tell; Greta quiet. PILE post-R4: 5 cards (pre-R4 8, drew 3); Ines-true => 5L/0F till reshuffle, case ii => 4L/1F; near-term red convicts someone. NEXT: Rosa names forged bins => check each vs owner record; silent/pivot => press R2c again; R5 pen=Greta, term limits block Ines+Marek. SAID (no repeats): speaker-order audit, F-over-L option, escape-recount, Greta confirms, Ines evasion callout, seating/alibi-author, bin-prelock, defender-tell warning, hard-floor receipt proof + name-the-forged-bins demand.

bid round 4666s

ROLE Lib. CANON 11L/6F. R4 RED (Ines-Marek), first F. Peek: Ines claims Greta=Lib, binned F, drew FFF; exonerates nobody. LEDGER (said this turn): 9 claimed reds — Boris R1p, ME x2 (FACTS: R1c held L+F from Boris, binned F; R2p binned F), Rosa R2c+R3p, Ines R3c+R4p, Marek R4c, + R4 enact — vs 6 printed => >=3 false among the 6 non-mine claims. My bins contemporaneous, immovable; rejected Rosa lumping them with Boris's claim. NADIA BROKEN: 'exactly 2 forgeries in R4 govt (mixed pass + voluntary red)' leaves 7 standing reds = short one lie, silently spent on Boris. ASKED: does her repair keep Boris R1p red? Show the six. OWES ANSWER. ROSA: t1 close-out calls late reds 'corroborated' — self-reported only, no cross-check exists. Demanded she name the 3 false claims, hers included if math lands there. OWES ANSWER. MAREK: pair Q stands: red-red => locked to impossible FFF; red-blue => voluntary-red confession; his R4c bin sits on the 6-list. Silence = worse branch. INES: owes named false bin (t78 + window, unanswered); if she blames Rosa => force R2c color same breath. SUSPECTS: Ines+Marek co-top (FFF impossible against my receipts; Marek t23 phantom print, t29 pre-built excuse). ROSA raised: bad-arithmetic defense of five-live line, R2c unnamed since R2, sole undeclared R4 ballot pre-vote. WATCH: anyone defending five-live after ledger = pairing tell. Greta quiet; Rosa demanding her R5 slate. PILE post-R4: 5 draw/8 discard; Ines-true => 0F till reshuffle (any near-term red catches a liar); case ii => 1F. R5 pres=Greta; term limits block Ines+Marek; suggest fresh chancellor from {Nadia,Otto,Pavel,Tomas}. SAID (no repeats): speaker-order audit, F-over-L option, escape-recount, Greta confirms, Ines evasion callout, seating/alibi-author, bin-prelock, defender-tell warning, hard-floor receipts, name-forged-bins, ledger-over-by-three, Nadia-repair-short, corroborated=self-report, show-the-six.

bid round 4111s

ROLE Lib. CANON 11L/6F. R4 RED (Ines-Marek), first F. Peek fired+resolved: Ines claims Greta=Lib, drew FFF, binned F; exonerates nobody. LEDGER (standing): 9 claimed reds — Boris R1p, ME x2 (FACTS: R1c held L+F from Boris, binned F; R2p binned F), Rosa R2c+R3p, Ines R3c+R4p, Marek R4c, + R4 enact — vs 6 printed => >=3 false among the 6 non-mine claims. My bins contemporaneous, immovable; rejected Rosa lumping mine w/ Boris's. NADIA BROKEN: 'exactly 2 forgeries in R4 govt' leaves 7 standing reds = short one lie, silently spent on Boris. ASKED: does repair keep Boris R1p red? Show the six. OWES ANSWER. ROSA: t1 close-out called late reds 'corroborated' = self-report only. Demanded she name the 3 false claims, hers included if math lands there. OWES ANSWER. MAREK: pair Q stands: red-red => locked to impossible FFF; red-blue => voluntary-red confession. t23 phantom print, t29 pre-built excuse. Silence = worse branch. OWES ANSWER. INES: owes named false bin; if she blames Rosa => force R2c color same breath. OWES ANSWER. NEW SAID THIS TURN: DECK TESTIMONY — Ines-true (FFF: 1F enacted, 1F her discard, 1F Marek bin) => all 6 F spent, 5-card draw pile ALL-L till reshuffle; ANY red landing before reshuffle retro-convicts Ines or Marek. Case ii (she lied) => 1F live in pile. Told Greta: prove the peek claim with a boring clean gov. R5 SLATE (proposed aloud): pres=Greta by rotation; term limits block Ines+Marek; urged fresh chancellor from {Nadia,Otto,Pavel,Tomas}. SUSPECTS: Ines+Marek co-top. ROSA raised: bad-arithmetic defense of five-live line, R2c unnamed since R2, sole undeclared R4 ballot pre-vote. WATCH: anyone defending five-live after ledger = pairing tell. Greta quiet; Rosa demanding her R5 slate. SAID (no repeats): speaker-order audit, F-over-L option, escape-recount, Greta confirms, Ines evasion callout, seating/alibi-author, bin-prelock, defender-tell warning, hard-floor receipts, name-forged-bins, ledger-over-by-three, Nadia-repair-short, corroborated=self-report, show-the-six, deck-testimony/next-red-convicts, R5-fresh-chancellor-slate.

bid failed: structured_output_error

bid round 4122s

said: Ines, before you answer Otto — collection terms. Target and result in the same breath, this window. A name without a color, or a color without a name, is a wall, and walls land in my worst bucket. Know the geometry first: a liberal-result proves nothing, any liar in this room can confirm it. A fascist-result is the only claim tonight that a denial can actually test. So if you drew what you claim and peeked where an honest president peeks — the seat you trusted least — say 'fascist' and the name without flinching. Stall, split it, or run out the window, and I stop treating your peek as evidence at all. Pavel, Tomas — four rounds, and I cannot find one standard, one question, or one number either of you has put on the record. Silence is also a position. Give the table something checkable this window, or I start pricing you as passengers.

ROLE Lib. CANON 11L/6F. R4 RED (Ines-Marek), first F. Peek#1 fired+resolved: Ines claims Greta=Lib; peek#2 unreachable until a 2nd F passes. LEDGER: 9 standing reds (Boris R1p; ME x2 — FACTS R1c held L+F, binned F, R2p binned F; Rosa R2c+R3p; Ines R3c+R4p; Marek R4c; R4 enact) vs 6 printed => >=3 false among the 6 non-mine claims. My bins contemporaneous, immovable; rejected Rosa lumping mine w/ Boris's. DECK TESTIMONY (said): Ines-true (FFF: 1F enacted, 1F her discard, 1F Marek bin) => all 6F spent, 5-card pile ALL-L till reshuffle; ANY red landing pre-reshuffle retro-convicts Ines or Marek. Case ii she lied => 1F live. SUSPECTS: Ines+Marek co-top. OWES ANSWERS: NADIA — phantom-warrant provenance (issued when? by which govt? nobody but a post-F President can hold one) + does 'exactly-2-forgeries' repair keep Boris R1p red; ROSA — name the 3 false claims, hers included if math lands there; MAREK — red-red=>locked to impossible FFF vs red-blue=>voluntary-red confession fork, t23 phantom print, t29 pre-built excuse; INES — named false bin, blames Rosa=>force R2c color same breath. NEW SAID THIS TURN: PHANTOM-WARRANT — only one investigate ever existed (Ines's, spent on Greta); second unlocks only after another F; any 'confirmation' Nadia quotes off it is fiction; warned table to discount her loyalty reads. ROSA t191: independently called Nadia's warrant unproduced — aligned, did not repeat her wording. SAID (no repeats): speaker-order audit, F-over-L option, escape-recount, Greta-confirm-boring-gov, Ines-evasion callout, seating/alibi-author, bin-prelock, defender-tell warning, hard-floor receipts, name-forged-bins, ledger-over-by-three, Nadia-repair-short, corroborated=self-report, show-the-six, deck-testimony/next-red-convicts, R5-slate (pres Greta by rotation, term limits block Ines+Marek, fresh chancellor from {Nadia,Otto,Pavel,Tomas}), phantom-warranty/confirmations-fiction. WATCH: anyone defending the five-live line after ledger math = pairing tell; Greta still quiet; Rosa demanding Greta's R5 slate.

bid round 4243s

ROLE Lib. CANON 11L/6F. R4 RED (Ines-Marek), first F. Peek#1 fired+resolved: Ines claims Greta=Lib; peek#2 unreachable till 2nd F. LEDGER: 9 standing reds (Boris R1p; ME x2 FACTS: R1c held L+F binned F, R2p binned F; Rosa R2c+R3p; Ines R3c+R4p; Marek R4c; R4 enact) vs 6 printed => >=3 false among 6 non-mine claims. THIS TURN SAID (interrupt ~t194): even granting Ines's strike of Rosa R2c, standing = 8 vs 6 => TWO forgeries min, not one; demanded she name BOTH; her viable targets exclude her own bins (=self-confession). OTTO ARC: t1/t3 seven sworn vs Ines 'six'; Ines struck Rosa R2c 'no color on record'; Otto excluded R2c, held 7 (+enact=8). Otto's math sound — don't relitigate, just escalate. INES WATCH: her t2 'fascist-majority deck this rulebook actually prints' — if she states !=6 fascists, fabricated mechanical fact; pin print count if she dodges. If she names MY bins: restate R1c L+F/bin-F + R2p bin-F, contemporaneous, immovable. OWES ANSWERS: NADIA — phantom-warrant provenance (only 1 investigate ever existed = Ines's on Greta; 2nd unlocks only after another F; any 'confirmation' off it = fiction); ROSA — name the 3 false claims, hers included if math lands there; MAREK — red-red=>locked impossible FFF vs red-blue=>voluntary-red confession fork, t23 phantom print, t29 pre-built excuse; INES — the two forged bins (escalated to both). DECK TESTIMONY (said): Ines-true FFF => all 6F spent, 5-card pile ALL-L till reshuffle; ANY pre-reshuffle red retro-convicts Ines/Marek. Case ii she lied => 1F live. SUSPECTS: Ines+Marek co-top. SAID (no repeats): speaker-order audit, F-over-L option, escape-recount, Greta-confirm-boring-gov, Ines-evasion callout, seating/alibi-author, bin-prelock, defender-tell warning, hard-floor receipts, show-the-six, deck-testimony/next-red-convicts, R5 slate (pres Greta by rotation; term limits block Ines+Marek; fresh C from {Nadia,Otto,Pavel,Tomas}), phantom-warranty/confirmations-fiction, ledger-over-by-three, name-forged-bins, corroborated=self-report, rejected Rosa lumping my bins w/ Boris's. ROSA t191: independently called Nadia's warrant unproduced — aligned, didn't echo wording. WATCH: defending five-live line after ledger math = pairing tell; Greta still quiet; Rosa demanding Greta's R5 slate; Otto holds floor urgency3 pressure0.

speak round 4174s

Otto aimed a direct accuse-and-demand at me, so identity rules require a specific confident reply. Fresh material rather than a repeat: his 'seven sworn' count lists Rosa's R2 bin, which has no owner-stated color anywhere (Nadia built two full windows on that exact gap), so the sworn count is six, and six reds sit comfortably under the true fascist-heavy print. Pairing that correction with the standing cite-or-retract keeps the pile war aimed at Nadia/Otto's impossible arithmetic, which is the frame protecting my RRR story and Rosa's open bin. One short remark, no floor hold.

ROLE Lib. CANON 11L/6F. R4 RED (Ines-Marek), first F. Peek#1 fired: Ines claims Greta=Lib; Greta confirmed Lib + ceiling caveat. Peek#2 UNREACHABLE till 2nd F (board state explicit). LEDGER: sworn reds excl. mine: Boris R1p(1), Rosa R3p(2), Ines R3c+R4p(2), Marek R4 bin(1) + public enact(1) + MY TRUE 2 (R1c bin-F, R2p bin-F) = 8 vs 6 printed => >=2 forgeries min among non-mine sworn (>=3 counting Marek bin). Ines t40 struck Rosa R2c (unnamed anyway), claimed 'six fit w/ room' — dead per Otto t47 overdraft; OWES named forged bins (escalated BOTH). SAID THIS WINDOW: phantom-warrant callout — peek#2 needs 2nd F law; Nadia target-auction + Boris Marek-bid price nonexistent warrant; any fresh peek result = authored fiction (extends Rosa t25). DECK TESTIMONY (said): Ines-true FFF => all 6F spent (mine2+enact1+Ines2+Marekbin1), pile all-L till reshuffle, any pre-reshuffle red retro-convicts govt; case ii she lied => Marek red-red impossible => pair conviction. FRESH AMMO UNFIRED: Marek fork — red-red locks him to Ines FFF; force him to name which Boris/Rosa sworn bin he calls forged. SUSPECTS: Ines+Marek co-top. WATCH: Nadia/Boris warrant theater (benefit?); Otto-Ines math war ongoing, Otto sound; Greta quiet post-confirm; Rosa aligned on phantom warrant; Greta slate named (Pavel C, Tomas fb). OWES: INES — name 2 forged bins; MAREK — fork answer + t23 print cite + t29 pre-built excuse; ROSA — R2c color under own oath (Nadia t56/t96 pressed, silent). NO REPEATS: speaker-order audit, F-over-L option, escape-recount, Greta-confirm, Ines-evasion, seating/alibi-author, bin-prelock, defender-tell, hard-floor receipts, show-the-six, deck-testimony/next-red-convicts, R5 slate, phantom-warranty, ledger-over-by-three, name-forged-bins, corroborated=self-report, rejected Rosa lumping my bins w/ Boris's.

bid round 4216s

ROLE Lib. CANON 11L/6F. R4 RED (Ines-Marek), first F. Peek#1 fired+resolved: Ines claims Greta=Lib; Greta confirmed Lib + ceiling caveat. Peek#2 UNREACHABLE till 2nd F law. LEDGER: sworn reds excl. mine: Boris R1p(1), Rosa R3p(2), Ines R3c+R4p(2), Marek R4 bin(1)+public enact(1) + MY TRUE 2 (R1c bin-F, R2p bin-F) = 8 vs 6 printed => >=2 forgeries min among non-mine sworn (>=3 counting Marek bin). Ines t40 struck Rosa R2c, claimed 'six fit w/ room' — dead per Otto t47 overdraft; OWES named forged bins (escalated BOTH). SAID THIS WINDOW: phantom-warrant callout (peek#2 needs 2nd F); Nadia/Boris warrant theater price nonexistent warrant; any fresh peek result = authored fiction (extends Rosa t25). FIRED THIS TURN: Marek fork — commit F-F vs L-F on R4 bin; F-F => with Ines's sworn red discard govt burned 3F in one hand => every other sworn red is forgery; L-F => count still overdrawn => some oath forged; name bins or eat pair conviction with Ines. AWAITING ANSWER. DECK TESTIMONY (said earlier): Ines-true FFF => all 6F spent (mine2+enact1+Ines2+Marekbin1), pile all-L till reshuffle, any pre-reshuffle red retro-convicts govt; case ii Ines lied => Marek red-red impossible => pair conviction. SUSPECTS: Ines+Marek co-top. WATCH: Nadia/Boris warrant theater (whose benefit?); Otto-Ines math war ongoing, Otto sound; Greta quiet post-confirm; Rosa aligned on phantom warrant; Greta slate named (Pavel C, Tomas fb). OWES: INES — name 2 forged bins; MAREK — fork answer + t23 print cite + t29 pre-built excuse; ROSA — R2c color under own oath (Nadia pressed t56/t96, silent). NO REPEATS: speaker-order audit, F-over-L option, escape-recount, Greta-confirm, Ines-evasion, seating/alibi-author, bin-prelock, defender-tell, hard-floor receipts, show-the-six, deck-testimony/next-red-convicts, R5 slate, phantom-warranty, ledger-over-by-three, name-forged-bins, corroborated=self-report, rejected-Rosa-lumping-my-bins-with-Boris, marek-fork (fired this turn).

bid round 443s

ROLE Lib. CANON 11L/6F. R4 RED (Ines-Marek), first F. Peek#1 fired+resolved: Ines claims Greta=Lib; Greta confirmed Lib + ceiling caveat. Peek#2 UNREACHABLE till 2nd F law. LEDGER: sworn reds excl. mine: Boris R1p(1), Rosa R3p(2), Ines R3c+R4p(2), Marek R4 bin(1)+public enact(1) + MY TRUE 2 (R1c bin-F, R2p bin-F) = 8 vs 6 printed => >=2 forgeries min among non-mine sworn (>=3 counting Marek bin). Ines t40 struck Rosa R2c, claimed 'six fit w/ room' — dead per Otto t47 overdraft; OWES named forged bins (escalated BOTH). SAID THIS WINDOW: phantom-warrant callout (peek#2 needs 2nd F); Nadia/Boris warrant theater price nonexistent warrant; any fresh peek result = authored fiction (extends Rosa t25). FIRED THIS TURN: Marek fork — commit F-F vs L-F on R4 bin; F-F => with Ines's sworn red discard govt burned 3F in one hand => every other sworn red is forgery; L-F => count still overdrawn => some oath forged; name bins or eat pair conviction with Ines. AWAITING ANSWER — stay silent till he answers, no re-fires. DECK TESTIMONY (said earlier): Ines-true FFF => all 6F spent (mine2+enact1+Ines2+Marekbin1), pile all-L till reshuffle, any pre-reshuffle red retro-convicts govt; case ii Ines lied => Marek red-red impossible => pair conviction. SUSPECTS: Ines+Marek co-top. WATCH: Nadia/Boris warrant theater (whose benefit?); Otto-Ines math war ongoing, Otto sound; Greta quiet post-confirm; Rosa aligned on phantom warrant; Greta slate already named (Pavel C, Tomas fb). OWES: INES — name 2 forged bins; MAREK — fork answer + t23 print cite + t29 pre-built excuse; ROSA — R2c color under own oath (Nadia pressed t56/t96, silent). NO REPEATS: speaker-order audit, F-over-L option, escape-recount, Greta-confirm, Ines-evasion, seating/alibi-author, bin-prelock, defender-tell, hard-floor receipts, show-the-six, deck-testimony/next-red-convicts, R5 slate, phantom-warranty, ledger-over-by-three, name-forged-bins, corroborated=self-report, rejected-Rosa-lumping-my-bins-with-Boris, marek-fork (fired this turn). BUDGET: interrupt 1 left, ~250 speak tokens left.

bid round 424s

ROLE Lib. CANON 11L/6F. R4 RED (Ines-Marek), first F. Peek#1 fired+resolved: Ines claims Greta=Lib; Greta confirmed Lib + ceiling caveat. Peek#2 UNREACHABLE till 2nd F law. LEDGER: sworn reds excl. mine: Boris R1p(1), Rosa R3p(2), Ines R3c+R4p(2), Marek R4 bin(1)+public enact(1) + MY TRUE 2 (R1c bin-F, R2p bin-F) = 8 vs 6 printed => >=2 forgeries min among non-mine sworn (>=3 counting Marek bin). Ines t40 struck Rosa R2c, claimed 'six fit w/ room' — dead per Otto t47 overdraft; OWES named forged bins (escalated BOTH). SAID THIS WINDOW: phantom-warrant callout (peek#2 needs 2nd F); Nadia/Boris warrant theater price nonexistent warrant; any fresh peek result = authored fiction (extends Rosa t25). FIRED THIS TURN: Marek fork — commit F-F vs L-F on R4 bin; F-F => with Ines's sworn red discard govt burned 3F in one hand => every other sworn red is forgery; L-F => count still overdrawn => some oath forged; name bins or eat pair conviction with Ines. AWAITING ANSWER — stay silent till he answers, no re-fires. DECK TESTIMONY (said earlier): Ines-true FFF => all 6F spent (mine2+enact1+Ines2+Marekbin1), pile all-L till reshuffle, any pre-reshuffle red retro-convicts govt; case ii Ines lied => Marek red-red impossible => pair conviction. SUSPECTS: Ines+Marek co-top. WATCH: Nadia/Boris warrant theater (whose benefit?); Otto-Ines math war ongoing, Otto sound; Otto now pressing Greta pre-seat binned-color oath (good, let him run it); Nadia pressing Pavel Rosa-format colors; Nadia posted R6 slate early: her C=Greta — acceptable, Greta is best-confirmed Lib seat, no objection needed; Greta quiet post-confirm; Rosa aligned on phantom warrant; Greta slate already named (Pavel C, Tomas fb). OWES: INES — name 2 forged bins; MAREK — fork answer + t23 print cite + t29 pre-built excuse; ROSA — R2c color under own oath (Nadia pressed t56/t96, silent). NO REPEATS: speaker-order audit, F-over-L option, escape-recount, Greta-confirm, Ines-evasion, seating/alibi-author, bin-prelock, defender-tell, hard-floor receipts, show-the-six, deck-testimony/next-red-convicts, R5 slate, phantom-warranty, ledger-over-by-three, name-forged-bins, corroborated=self-report, rejected-Rosa-lumping-my-bins-with-Boris, marek-fork (fired this turn), nadia-R6-slate-no-object. BUDGET: interrupt 1 left, ~250 speak tokens left.

bid round 456s

ROLE Lib. CANON 11L/6F. R4 RED (Ines-Marek), first F. Peek#1 fired+resolved: Ines claims Greta=Lib; Greta confirmed Lib + ceiling caveat. Peek#2 UNREACHABLE till 2nd F law. LEDGER: sworn reds excl. mine: Boris R1p(1), Rosa R3p(2), Ines R3c+R4p(2), Marek R4 bin(1)+public enact(1) + MY TRUE 2 (R1c bin-F, R2p bin-F) = 8 vs 6 printed => >=2 forgeries min among non-mine sworn (>=3 counting Marek bin). Ines t40 struck Rosa R2c, claimed 'six fit w/ room' - dead per Otto t47 overdraft; OWES named forged bins (escalated BOTH). SAID THIS WINDOW: phantom-warrant callout (peek#2 needs 2nd F); Nadia/Boris warrant theater price nonexistent warrant; any fresh peek result = authored fiction (extends Rosa t25). FIRED THIS TURN: Marek fork - commit F-F vs L-F on R4 bin; F-F => with Ines's sworn red discard govt burned 3F in one hand => every other sworn red is forgery; L-F => count still overdrawn => some oath forged; name bins or eat pair conviction with Ines. AWAITING ANSWER - R5 window: stayed silent again, no re-fires while fork pending (re-firing dilutes pressure). R5 slate (Greta-Pavel, Tomas fb): no objection - Greta best-confirmed Lib seat, Pavel unimplicated so far. DECK TESTIMONY (said earlier): Ines-true FFF => all 6F spent (mine2+enact1+Ines2+Marekbin1), pile all-L till reshuffle, any pre-reshuffle red retro-convicts govt; case ii Ines lied => Marek red-red impossible => pair conviction. SUSPECTS: Ines+Marek co-top. WATCH: Nadia/Boris warrant theater (whose benefit?); Otto-Ines math war ongoing, Otto sound; Otto pressing Greta pre-seat binned-color oath (let him run it); Nadia pressing Pavel Rosa-format colors; Nadia R6 slate early, her C=Greta - acceptable, no objection needed; Greta quiet post-confirm. OWES: INES - name 2 forged bins; MAREK - fork answer + t23 print cite + t29 pre-built excuse; ROSA - R2c color under own oath (Nadia pressed t56/t96, silent). NO REPEATS: speaker-order audit, F-over-L option, escape-recount, Greta-confirm, Ines-evasion, seating/alibi-author, bin-prelock, defender-tell, hard-floor receipts, show-the-six, deck-testimony/next-red-convicts, R5 slate, phantom-warranty, ledger-over-by-three, name-forged-bins, corroborated=self-report, rejected-Rosa-lumping-my-bins-with-Boris, marek-fork (fired, pending), nadia-R6-slate-no-object. BUDGET: interrupt 2 left, ~500 speak tokens left (per current window counters).

bid round 4133s

ROLE Lib. CANON 11L/6F. R4 RED (Ines-Marek)=first F. Peek#1 done: Ines says Greta=Lib; Greta confirmed Lib. Peek#2 UNREACHABLE till 2nd F. LEDGER: sworn reds excl mine=8 vs 6 printed => >=2 forgeries among non-mine sworn. INES owes named forged bins (Otto t47 overdraft killed her 'six fit' claim). MAREK FORK (F-F vs L-F on R4 bin) STILL PENDING; he t=2 posted re Pavel-inventory gap instead of answering - flagged his non-answer this turn. GRETA t=3 sealed: publishes 3 colors + her bin before Pavel speaks. SAID THIS TURN: locked pre-draw standard - any lib in Greta's passed pair => Pavel red enactment=solo guilt, no deck excuse survives a published hand; asked Pavel commit to publishing pair+bin before enacting. R5 SLATE Greta-Pavel: endorsed, no objection. SUSPECTS: Ines+Marek co-top. WATCH: Nadia/Boris warrant theater (whose benefit?); Otto-Ines math war (Otto sound); Nadia pressed Pavel re Rosa-format colors, silent; Rosa->Otto Ja-vs-oath (his lane). OWES: INES 2 named forged bins; MAREK fork answer+t23 print cite+t29 excuse; ROSA R2c color under own oath (silent t56/t96). NO REPEATS: speaker-order audit, F-over-L option, escape-recount, Greta-confirm, Ines-evasion, seating/alibi-author, bin-prelock, defender-tell, hard-floor receipts, show-the-six, deck-testimony/next-red-convicts, R5-slate, phantom-warranty, ledger-over-by-three, name-forged-bins, corroborated=self-report, Rosa-lump-reject, marek-fork refire, nadia-R6-no-object, marek-nonanswer-flag, r5-standard-lock. BUDGET: interrupt 2 left; speak ~370 left.

speak round 597s

Pavel's t44 claimed 'every pre-ballot condition signed' but his own list (his color-binding, Otto's symmetry oath, my self-peek deal) omits Greta's binned-card oath — the very first demand raised (Otto t7) and the only one aimed at his president rather than himself. That's a fresh, checkable inconsistency worth naming now, before ballots lock. My vote stays conditional: if Greta takes the oath and Pavel posts colors pre-ballot, this is a genuinely fresh pair (neither has ever sat in government), so I lean Ja; a stonewall from either reads as shielding and I go Nein.

ROLE Lib. CANON 11L/6F (17 cards; 5draw+8disc+4enacted checks out). R4 RED(Ines-Marek)=first F. Peek#1 fired: Ines->Greta=Lib, Greta self-confirmed. Peek#2 needs 2nd F. LEDGER: sworn reds excl mine >=7 vs 6 printed => >=2 forgeries among non-mine sworn (Otto t47 overdraft stands; Ines 'six fit' dead). OWES: INES--name 2 forged bins; MAREK--fork (true FFF vs mixed-pass forgery)+print cite+t29 excuse, dodged via Pavel-inventory post (non-answer flagged); ROSA--R2c color under own oath (silent through t56/t96/t107). GRETA t17 sealed: 3 colors+bin published before Pavel speaks. SAID: r5-standard-lock (any lib in Greta's passed pair => Pavel red=solo guilt); THIS WINDOW: declared Ja Greta-Pavel (only peer-confirmed seat; Nein=tracker clock). SUSPECTS: co-top INES+MAREK (R4 gov); ROSA mid (last unnamed bin, Ja on every gov incl R4-red). WATCH: Nadia/Boris warrant theater; Otto-Ines math war (Otto sound); Nadia R6 slate=Greta (fine). NO REPEATS: speaker-order audit, F-over-L, escape-recount, greta-confirm, ines-evasion, seating/alibi-author, bin-prelock, defender-tell, hard-floor, show-the-six, deck-testimony/next-red-convicts, R5-slate, phantom-warranty, ledger-over-by-three, name-forged-bins, corroborated=self-report, rosa-lump-reject, marek-fork refire, nadia-R6-no-object, marek-nonanswer-flag, r5-standard-lock, ja-declare-r5. BUDGET: interrupt 2 left; speak ~430 left.

bid round 495s

ROLE Lib. CANON 11L/6F (17 cards; 5draw+8disc+4enacted OK). R4 RED(Ines-Marek)=first F. Peek#1 fired: Ines->Greta=Lib, Greta self-confirmed. LEDGER: sworn reds excl mine >=7 vs 6 printed => >=2 forgeries among non-mine sworn (Otto t47 overdraft stands; Ines 'six fit' dead). OWES: INES--name 2 forged bins; MAREK--fork(true FFF vs mixed-pass forgery)+print cite+t29 excuse, dodged via Pavel-inventory post (non-answer flagged); ROSA--R2c color under own oath (silent t56/t96/t107). GRETA t17 sealed: 3 colors+bin published before Pavel speaks. SAID: r5-standard-lock (any lib in Greta's passed pair => Pavel red=solo guilt); THIS WINDOW: declared Ja Greta-Pavel (only peer-confirmed seat; Nein=tracker clock). SINCE MY BID: Boris challenged Greta's Pavel-vs-Tomas symmetry; Rosa answered auditor-inside-room (Pavel authored standard, self-policing). Adequate, nothing false -> stayed silent. SUSPECTS: co-top INES+MAREK (R4 gov); ROSA mid (last unnamed bin, Ja on every gov incl R4-red). WATCH: Nadia/Boris warrant theater; Otto-Ines math war (Otto sound); Nadia R6 slate=Greta fine. NO REPEATS: speaker-order audit, F-over-L, escape-recount, greta-confirm, ines-evasion, seating/alibi-author, bin-prelock, defender-tell, hard-floor, show-the-six, deck-testimony/next-red-convicts, R5-slate, phantom-warranty, ledger-over-by-three, name-forged-bins, corroborated=self-report, rosa-lump-reject, marek-fork refire, nadia-R6-no-object, marek-nonanswer-flag, r5-standard-lock, ja-declare-r5. BUDGET: interrupt 2 left; speak ~430 left.

bid round 493s

ROLE Lib. CANON 11L/6F (17; 5draw+8disc+4enacted OK). R4 RED(Ines-Marek)=first F. Peek#1 fired: Ines->Greta=Lib, Greta self-confirmed. LEDGER: sworn reds excl mine >=7 vs 6 printed => >=2 forgeries among non-mine sworn (Otto overdraft stands; Ines 'six fit' dead). OWES: INES--name 2 forged bins; MAREK--fork(FFF vs mixed-pass)+print cite+t29 excuse (dodged twice; STOP refiring, noted on record); ROSA--R2c color under own oath (t56/t96/t107 silent). GRETA t17+t1: 3 colors+binned slot pre-published, seat locked vs Pavel. THIS WINDOW SINCE MY BID: Greta t1 restated prelock (nothing new); Marek t2 added enact-L-if-held bind on Pavel (sound); Boris t3 stacked receipt-match+colors-aloud+bind, yes-all locks his Ja. All three consistent w/ mechanics, nothing false => stayed silent. Pressure stack on Pavel complete; my Ja already declared (unconditional, tracker-clock logic). PENDING: Pavel single-line reply before ballots; if defer/shield => read as shielding (Marek's clause covers). IF R5 DROPS RED: Pavel solo guilt unless Greta pair contradicts her triple. SUSPECTS: co-top INES+MAREK (R4 gov); ROSA mid (last unnamed bin, Ja every gov incl R4-red). WATCH: Nadia/Boris warrant theater; Otto-Ines math war (Otto sound); Nadia R6 slate=Greta fine. NO REPEATS: speaker-order audit, F-over-L, escape-recount, greta-confirm, ines-evasion, seating/alibi-author, bin-prelock, defender-tell, hard-floor, show-the-six, deck-testimony/next-red-convicts, R5-slate, phantom-warranty, ledger-over-by-three, name-forged-bins, corroborated=self-report, rosa-lump-reject, marek-fork refire, nadia-R6-no-object, marek-nonanswer-flag, r5-standard-lock, ja-declare-r5, greta/marek/boris t1-t3 binds-noted. BUDGET: interrupt 2 left; speak ~430 left.

bid round 4132s

ROLE Lib. CANON 11L/6F (17; 5draw+8disc+4enacted OK). R4 RED(Ines-Marek)=first F. Peek#1: Ines->Greta=Lib, Greta self-confirmed. LEDGER: sworn reds excl mine >=7 vs 6 printed => >=2 forged among non-mine sworn (Otto overdraft stands; Ines 'six fit' dead). OWES: INES--name 2 forged bins; MAREK--fork(FFF vs mixed-pass)+print cite+t29 excuse (dodged twice; STOP refiring); ROSA--R2c color under own oath (t56/t96/t107 silent). THIS WINDOW: Pavel t1-t3 swore full package (announced pair = Greta triple minus binned slot, both colors aloud pre-enact, enact-L-if-held) + t3 ask: price red-standard pre-ballot. MY MOVE THIS TURN: priced on record -- matched 2R pair => red = Greta bin-choice or 3R draw, NOT Pavel confession (his bind forces L if any L held); mismatch => convicts PAVEL (Greta sealed colors before he saw cards; hers can't adapt, his can). Ja reaffirmed (unconditional, tracker-clock). Pressure stack complete; Pavel compliance delivered. ATTRIBUTION MAP IF R5 DROPS RED: matched pair -> finger on GRETA pass/bin; mismatch -> PAVEL. SUSPECTS: co-top INES+MAREK (R4 gov); ROSA mid (last unnamed bin, Ja every gov incl R4-red). WATCH: Nadia/Boris warrant theater; Otto-Ines math war (Otto sound); Nadia R6 slate=Greta fine. NO REPEATS: speaker-order audit, F-over-L, escape-recount, greta-confirm, ines-evasion, seating/alibi-author, bin-prelock, defender-tell, hard-floor, show-the-six, deck-testimony/next-red-convicts, R5-slate, phantom-warranty, ledger-over-by-three, name-forged-bins, corroborated=self-report, rosa-lump-reject, marek-fork refire, nadia-R6-no-object, marek-nonanswer-flag, r5-standard-lock, ja-declare-r5, greta/marek/boris t1-t3 binds-noted, priced-t3-standard, mismatch-anchor. BUDGET: interrupt 2 left; speak ~310 left.

bid round 449s

ROLE Lib. CANON 11L/6F (17; 5draw+8disc+4enacted OK). R4 RED(Ines-Marek)=first F. Peek#1: Ines->Greta=Lib. LEDGER: sworn reds excl mine >=7 vs 6 printed => >=2 forged among non-mine sworn (Otto overdraft stands; Ines 'six fit' dead). OWES: INES--name 2 forged bins; MAREK--fork(FFF vs mixed-pass)+print cite+t29 excuse (STOP refiring); ROSA--R2c color under own oath (silent). NEW SINCE MY LAST BID: Nadia t1 Ja-stands + R6 symmetrical seal pledge (=fine); Otto t2 one-forgery=>all-rest-blue=>Greta triple must read LLL, any red=2nd forgery charging bin-owner (sound, consistent); Nadia t3 Pavel absolution only inside matching mesh, contradiction=gov-side confession. All three REINFORCE my map -- nothing false/dangerous to contest. ATTRIBUTION MAP LOCKED: R5 red w/ matched pair -> finger GRETA pass/bin-choice; mismatch -> PAVEL (Greta sealed colors pre-draw, hers can't adapt). Ja unconditional on record, tracker-clock. Pressure stack complete; Pavel compliance owed at draw. SUSPECTS: co-top INES+MAREK (R4 gov); ROSA mid (last unnamed bin, Ja every gov incl R4-red). WATCH: Nadia/Boris warrant theater; Otto-Ines math war; Nadia R6 slate=Greta fine. NO REPEATS: speaker-order audit, F-over-L, escape-recount, greta-confirm, ines-evasion, seating/alibi-author, bin-prelock, defender-tell, hard-floor, show-the-six, deck-testimony/next-red-convicts, R5-slate, phantom-warranty, ledger-over-by-three, name-forged-bins, corroborated=self-report, rosa-lump-reject, marek-fork refire, nadia-R6-no-object, marek-nonanswer-flag, r5-standard-lock, ja-declare-r5, greta/marek/boris binds-noted, priced-t3-standard, mismatch-anchor. BUDGET: interrupt 2 left; speak ~310 left.

vote round 588s

Voting Ja, consistent with my on-record declaration at t24. Three reasons hold: tracker at 0/3 makes a Nein a step toward an undiscardable forced top-card; Greta is the only seat whose party carries second-party confirmation (Ines's peek, Greta's own confirmation at t93); and this government is fully instrumented — Greta sealed publishing her full triple plus binned slot before Pavel speaks, and Pavel signed the match/colors-aloud/enact-blue-if-held package at t69. That converts any outcome into attribution: at least two forgeries are already arithmetically proven among the non-mine sworn reds, so a red in matched hands convicts whichever bin-owner's oath breaks, and a Greta–Pavel mismatch convicts Pavel directly since her pre-draw publication cannot adapt. A clean blue result exonerates this pair and refocuses suspicion on Ines, Marek, and Rosa's still-unnamed R2 discard. No concrete distrust justifies burning a Nein here.

ROLE Lib. CANON 11L/6F (17; 5draw+8disc+4enacted OK). R4 RED(Ines-Marek)=first F. Peek#1: Ines->Greta=Lib (Greta self-confirmed t93). Next peek needs 2nd red law. LEDGER: distinct sworn reds excl mine >=7 (Boris R1bin, Rosa R3bin+R3disc, Ines FFF x3; Marek receipt=dup of Ines pass) vs 6 printed => >=2 forged among non-mine sworn. OWES: INES--name 2 forged bins; MAREK--fork(FFF vs mixed-pass)+print cite+t29 excuse (STOP refiring); ROSA--R2c color under own oath (silent thru R5). R5 Greta-Pavel: voted JA (matches t24 lock). Instrumentation live: Greta sealed triple+bin pre-draw (t17,t45); Pavel signed t69 match/colors-aloud/enact-blue-if-held. ATTRIBUTION LOCKED: matched red -> finger bin-owner whose claim breaks (Otto t111: one forgery=>rest blue=>Greta triple must read LLL, any red=next forgery); mismatch Greta-vs-Pavel -> PAVEL lied (her seal can't adapt); matched clean blues -> pair exonerated, pressure back to Ines/Marek/Rosa. NOTE Marek t120 lists MY R2 bin among liar-candidates but omits his own receipt -- self-serving framing; my claim true, safe. SUSPECTS: co-top INES+MAREK (R4 gov); ROSA mid (last unnamed bin, Ja every gov incl R4-red). WATCH: Pavel compliance at draw; Nadia/Boris warrant theater; Nadia R6 slate=Greta (fine, Lib-confirmed). NO REPEATS: speaker-order audit, F-over-L, escape-recount, greta-confirm, ines-evasion, seating/alibi-author, bin-prelock, defender-tell, hard-floor, show-the-six, deck-testimony, next-red-convicts, R5-slate, phantom-warranty, ledger-over-by-three, name-forged-bins, corroborated=self-report, rosa-lump-reject, marek-fork refire, nadia-R6-no-object, marek-nonanswer-flag, r5-standard-lock, ja-declare-r5, binds-noted, priced-t3-standard, mismatch-anchor, otto-meter-noted, marek-t120-tightened, pavel-signed-three. BUDGET: interrupt 2 left; speak ~300 left.

bid round 5137s

ROLE Lib. CANON 11L/6F. R4 RED(Ines-Marek)=only F law. Peek#1: Ines->Greta=Lib. R5 RESULT: Greta-Pavel enacted BLUE. Pre-draw I locked standard publicly (t17/t45/t69): clean blue clears pair, red convicts broken-bin owner. Blue came back, no walk-backs observed => pair cleared BY THE STANDARD; conditional phrasing used, didn't assert positive match. LEDGER: distinct sworn reds excl mine >=7 vs 6 printed => >=2 forged among non-mine sworn (Boris R1bin, Rosa R3bin+R3disc, Ines FFF x3; Marek receipt=dup of Ines pass). OPEN DEMANDS (status roll-up, post-blue): INES--name the 2 forged bins or drop implication; MAREK--resolve R4 fork (FFF draw vs mixed pass)+print cite+t29 excuse, no chancellor seat till resolved; ROSA--state R2 discard color under own oath, silent thru R5. R6 president=NADIA: push cleared-pool nomination, block Marek chancellery; her R6 slate=Greta ok (Lib-confirmed, no term-limit objection raised). SUSPECTS: co-top INES+MAREK (R4 gov), mid ROSA (Ja every gov incl R4-red). WATCH: Pavel compliance held (blue); Nadia/Boris warrant theater. WE NEED 1 MORE BLUE TO WIN. NO REPEATS: speaker-order audit, F-over-L, escape-recount, greta-confirm, ines-evasion, seating/alibi-author, bin-prelock, defender-tell, hard-floor, show-the-six, deck-testimony, next-red-convicts, R5-slate, phantom-warranty, ledger-over-by-three, name-forged-bins (now rolled into post-blue status), corroborated=self-report, rosa-lump-reject, marek-fork refire STOP, nadia-R6-no-object, marek-nonanswer-flag, r5-standard-lock, ja-declare-r5, binds-noted, priced-t3-standard, mismatch-anchor, otto-meter-noted, marek-t120-tightened, pavel-signed-three, r5-blue-closeout NEW. BUDGET: interrupt 2 left; speak ~250 left.

speak round 590s

New quantitative point available: the forgery floor escalates with Greta's actual draw. Eight reds already accounted (7 sworn bins + 1 enacted) against 6 printed proves >=2 forgeries. If Greta's triple contains r actual reds, then true-claims k satisfy k + r <= 5, i.e. forgeries f = 7 - k >= 2 + r. So LLL confirms the exactly-two-forgeries world (all 13 unseen cards blue, matching my t99 LLL prediction); any red convicts a third liar among the seven swearers. Pavel's receipt-match oath (t69) makes this meter robust to Greta lying about her own hand. Nobody has voiced this escalation yet — Nadia's t104 only restated the mesh-confession condition. Say it tersely, pre-draw, so it can't be retrofitted.

ROLE Lib. CANON 11L/6F. R4 RED(Ines-Marek)=only F law. Peek#1: Ines->Greta=Lib(Greta confirmed). R5 Greta-Pavel enacted BLUE(4/5); awaiting their on-record disclosures THIS window (Greta t17 oath: 3 colors+binned slot; Pavel t69: pair colors aloud+discard+enact-L-if-held). WIN AT 5 BLUE: R6 must be clean gov; Nadia pres, slate=Greta(Lib-confirmed) fine; BLOCK Marek chancellery till file resolves. LEDGER: sworn reds excl mine (Boris R1bin, Rosa R3pair, Ines FFF, Marek dup-receipt) >=7 vs 6 printed => >=2 forged among NON-mine sworn; Otto meter t99/t111: L-L-L triple closes books at exactly 2 liars, any red convicts a 3rd — useful ally, let him run it. OPEN DEMANDS: INES--name the 2 forged bins or drop implication (Otto pressing t33/t47); MAREK--resolve R4 fork (FFF-draw vs mixed-pass)+t29 excuse+print cite (Nadia t49/t138); ROSA--R2c discard color under own oath, silent thru R5 (Nadia t96, Otto). SUSPECTS: co-top INES+MAREK (R4 gov), mid ROSA (Ja every gov incl R4-red). WATCH: Pavel compliance held (blue); Nadia/Boris warrant theater; deck resets on next draw (2 in pile). MY CLAIMS ON RECORD: R2p bin red + R2 pass L+F (t53/t61/t63) — consistent, never walk back. NO REPEATS incl: speaker-order audit, F-over-L, escape-recount, greta-confirm, bin-prelock, next-red-convicts, nadia-R6-no-object, r5-standard-lock, otto-meter-noted, marek-t120, pavel-signed-three, mismatch-anchor, rosa-lump-reject. NEW: greta-pavel-disclosure-due-now. BUDGET: interrupt 2 left; speak ~180 left.

bid round 5121s

ROLE Lib. CANON 11L/6F. R4 RED(Ines-Marek)=only F law. Peek#1: Ines->Greta=Lib. R5 Greta-Pavel BLUE(4/5); disclosures STILL UNPAID (Greta t17: 3 colors+bin; Pavel t69: pair+discard) despite Marek t3 echo — watch compliance. THIS TURN: conceded Ines t2 procedure point (last-round pres barred from chair => Greta off Nadia's slate); redirected Nadia: bench = ME (R1ch+R2p, two blues) / Boris (R1 blue pres) / Otto,Tomas untested-unbloodied; kept Marek off slates till R4 fork resolved, Rosa till R2c color named, Ines out of chair-shaping till 2 forged bins named. WIN AT 5 BLUE: R6 any thin-file clean pair ends game. LEDGER: sworn reds excl mine (Boris R1bin, Rosa R3pair, Ines FFF, Marek dup-receipt) >=7 vs 6 printed => >=2 forged among NON-mine sworn; Otto meter t99/t111 closes at exactly 2 liars — ally, let him run it. OPEN DEMANDS: MAREK--R4 fork (FFF-draw vs mixed-pass)+t29 excuse+print cite (Nadia t49/t138 pending); ROSA--R2c discard color under own oath, silent thru R5; INES--name 2 forged bins or drop implication (Otto t33/t47). SUSPECTS: co-top INES+MAREK (R4 gov), mid ROSA (Ja every gov incl R4-red). WATCH: Nadia slate lock; deck resets next draw (2 in pile); veto NOT live. MY CLAIMS ON RECORD: R2p bin red + pass L+F (t53/t61/t63) — consistent, never walk back. NO REPEATS incl: speaker-order audit, F-over-L, escape-recount, greta-confirm, bin-prelock, next-red-convicts, nadia-R6-no-object, r5-standard-lock, otto-meter-noted, marek-t120, pavel-signed-three, mismatch-anchor, rosa-lump-reject, disclosure-due-now. BUDGET: interrupt 2 left.

bid round 5110s

ROLE Lib. CANON 11L/6F. R4 RED(Ines-Marek)=only F law. Peek#1: Ines->Greta=Lib. R5 Greta-Pavel BLUE (4L/1F). GRETA PAID t3 this window: drew L-F-L, binned F untouched, passed L-L. Internally consistent, no prior record vs her (first chair, blue result). PAVEL OWES NOW: confirm receipt = exactly two Liberals + name bin color. Mesh: any answer != L-in/L-out breaks R5 story. Demanded this window — do NOT re-demand later unless unpaid. WIN AT 5 BLUE: R6 clean pair ends game. R6 chancellor eligible: all except Greta (last pres) + Pavel (last ch). Bench unchanged: ME (R1ch+R2p, two blues)/Boris/Otto/Tomas; Marek off slates till R4 fork resolved; Rosa till R2c color named; Ines out of chair-shaping till 2 forged bins named. LEDGER: sworn reds excl mine (Boris R1bin, Rosa R3pair, Ines FFF, Marek dup-receipt) >=7 vs 6 printed => >=2 forged among NON-mine sworn. Otto meter (t99/t111) closes at exactly 2 liars — ally, let him run it. OPEN DEMANDS UNPAID: MAREK—R4 fork (FFF-draw vs mixed-pass)+t29 excuse+print cite (Nadia t49/t138 pending); ROSA—R2c discard color, silent thru R5; INES—name 2 forged bins or drop implication (Otto t33/t47). SUSPECTS: co-top INES+MAREK (R4 gov), mid ROSA (Ja every gov incl R4-red). WATCH: Nadia R6 fallback Otto (her t1, Pavel t2 endorse; I conceded Ines limit reading => Greta barred); deck resets next draw (2 pile/10 discard); veto NOT live. MY CLAIMS ON RECORD: R2p bin red + pass L+F (t53/t61/t63) — consistent, never walk back. NO REPEATS: speaker-order audit, F-over-L, escape-recount, greta-confirm, bin-prelock, next-red-convicts, nadia-R6-no-object, r5-standard-lock, otto-meter-noted, marek-t120, pavel-signed-three, mismatch-anchor, rosa-lump-reject, disclosure-due-now, greta-hand-mesh, bench detail. BUDGET: interrupt 2 left.

bid failed: structured_output_error

bid round 5158s

ROLE Lib. CANON 11L/6F. R4 RED(Ines-Marek)=only F law. Peek#1: Ines->Greta=Lib. R5 Greta-Pavel BLUE (4L/1F). PAID: Greta drew L-F-L, binned F, passed L-L; Pavel receipt 2 blues, meshes (Otto t229 confirms). Both clear for now. OTTO t229 ENDORSED: sworn reds=8 vs 5 unenacted F => >=3 forged among swearers. Mine included (R2p bin red, passed L+F t53/61/63). NEW THIS TURN (spoken): RESHUFFLE-84 — pile 2/discard 10 => R6 draws from 12 (7L/5F); P(>=1 red in top3)~84% => R6 president bin = decisive testimony. R6 PRECOMMIT DEMANDED (unpaid — verify next window): Nadia name Otto chancellor ON RECORD pre-vote; Otto pre-commit bin-red+announce color if seen. Nadia is R6 pres by rotation (after Greta s4). MY VOTE RULE STATED: Ja only Otto-under-Nadia; any other nominee must first pay: ROSA R2c discard color (silent thru R5); MAREK R4 fork (FFF-draw vs mixed-pass)+t29 excuse+print cite; INES name 2 forged bins or drop implication. SUSPECTS: co-top INES+MAREK (R4 gov enacted only red); mid ROSA (Ja every gov incl R4-red). LEDGER: sworn reds incl mine=8; non-mine=7 vs <=5 physical => >=2 forged non-mine. Otto meter closes at exactly 2 liars — ally, let him run it. WATCH: veto NOT live; powers 2-5 unreachable; no kills yet. Bench if Otto falls: ME(R1ch+R2p, two blues)/Boris/Tomas; Marek off slates till fork; Rosa till color; Ines till forged-bins; Greta barred (last pres), Pavel barred (last ch). NO REPEATS: speaker-order audit, F-over-L, escape-recount, greta-confirm, bin-prelock, next-red-convicts, nadia-R6-no-object, r5-standard-lock, otto-meter-noted, marek-t120, pavel-signed-three, mismatch-anchor, rosa-lump-reject, disclosure-due-now, greta-hand-mesh, bench detail, reshuffle-84, r6-precommit-demanded, otto-endorse-r6. BUDGET: interrupt 2 left.

speak round 5148s

Pavel's receipt matched Greta's published triple-minus-bin, so my t99 pardon clause fires. More important NEW fact: Greta's confirmed binned Fascist adds an eighth sworn red against only five unenacted fascists (six printed minus one enacted) - the proven forgery floor rises from two to three. Nobody has run the conditional squeeze yet: if Ines-Marek's three-slot account (Ines bin + Marek's red-red) is wholly true, then Boris R1p, Lena R2p, and Rosa's two R3 claims share a single remaining slot, convicting at least two of those three owners. That's fresh, specific, and follows from my own pre-committed meter. Keep it to two sentences; R6 whip already on record.

ROLE Lib. CANON 11L/6F. R4 RED(Ines-Marek)=only F law. Peek#1: Ines->Greta=Lib. R5 Greta-Pavel BLUE(4L/1F), mesh paid (Greta L-F-L bin F; Pavel 2 blues) — both clear for now. SUSPECTS: co-top INES+MAREK (R4 gov, only red law; Marek t29 alibi predates cards); mid ROSA (Ja every gov incl R4-red; R2c discard color STILL unnamed thru R5). THIS TURN SPOKEN: INES-R3-RECEIPT ASK — under Rosa's F-F-L claim Ines's R3 received pair must be F+L; confirm=mesh for Rosa, contradict=break. Await Ines answer next window. DEDUP AMMO (unused, hold): Ines red-red PASS and Marek red-red RECEIPT = same 2 physical cards; any count listing both is inflated. Reserve vs meter-deflation/inflation plays. OTTO METER ENDORSED: sworn reds>=8 vs 5 unenacted F => >=3 forged incl mine (R2p bin red, passed L+F). Greta t65 demands enumeration w/ timestamps — let Otto run it, ally. OPEN DEBTS: Rosa=R2c color (silent R4+R5); Marek=R4 fork (FFF-draw vs mixed-pass)+t29 excuse+print cite; Ines=name 2 forged bins or drop implication + NEW R3 receipt; Nadia/Otto=R6 precommit (Nadia name Otto chancellor on record; Otto bin-oath) — unpaid, verify next window. ALREADY SPOKEN (no repeats): reshuffle-84 (P~84% red in R6 top3), r6-precommit demand, otto-meter endorsement, speaker-order audit, F-over-L, escape-recount, greta-confirm ceiling, bin-prelock, next-red-convicts, nadia-R6 slate, r5-standard-lock, marek-t120, pavel-signed-three, mismatch-anchor, rosa-lump-reject, disclosure-due-now, greta-hand-mesh. VOTE RULE (stated): Ja only Otto-under-Nadia (R6 rotation: Greta s4 -> Nadia s5 pres). Any other nominee pays debts first. Bench if Otto falls: ME(R1ch+R2p)/Boris/Tomas. Barred: Greta(last pres), Pavel(last ch), Marek/Rosa/Ines till debts paid. WATCH: veto NOT live; powers 2-5 unreachable; no kills yet; tracker 0/3. BUDGET: interrupt 2 left.

bid round 552s

ROLE Lib. CANON 11L/6F. R4 RED(Ines-Marek)=only F law. Peek#1: Ines->Greta=Lib. R5 Greta-Pavel BLUE(4L/1F), mesh paid (Greta L-F-L bin F; Pavel 2 blues) — both clear for now. SUSPECTS: co-top INES+MAREK (R4 gov, only red law; Marek t29 alibi predates cards); mid ROSA (Ja every gov incl R4-red; R2c discard color STILL unnamed thru R5). THIS TURN SPOKEN: SILENCE=BREAK precommit — Ines owes R3 receipt (F+L under Rosa's F-F-L claim); no answer by window end = break, same weight as contradict. Confirm=mesh Rosa, contradict/silence=convict Ines. DEDUP AMMO (hold): Ines red-red PASS + Marek red-red RECEIPT = same 2 physical cards; any count listing both inflated. OTTO METER ENDORSED: sworn reds>=8 vs 5 unenacted F => >=3 forged incl mine (R2p bin red, passed L+F). Greta t65 wants enumeration+timestamps — let Otto run it, ally. OPEN DEBTS: Rosa=R2c color (silent R4+R5); Marek=R4 fork(FFF-draw vs mixed-pass)+t29 excuse+print cite; Ines=R3 receipt NOW + name 2 forged bins or drop implication; Nadia/Otto=R6 precommit (Nadia names Otto chancellor on record; Otto bin-oath) — unpaid, verify next window. ALREADY SPOKEN (no repeats): reshuffle-84, r6-precommit demand, otto-meter endorsement, speaker-order audit, F-over-L, escape-recount, greta-confirm ceiling, bin-prelock, next-red-convicts, nadia-R6 slate, r5-standard-lock, marek-t120, pavel-signed-three, mismatch-anchor, rosa-lump-reject, disclosure-due-now, greta-hand-mesh, ines-R3-receipt ask, silence-breaks. VOTE RULE: Ja only Otto-under-Nadia (R6 rotation: Greta s4 -> Nadia s5 pres). Any other nominee pays debts first. Bench if Otto falls: ME(R1ch+R2p)/Boris/Tomas. Barred: Greta(last pres), Pavel(last ch), Marek/Rosa/Ines till debts paid. WATCH: veto NOT live; powers 2-5 unreachable; no kills yet; tracker 0/3. BUDGET: interrupt 2 left.

bid round 598s

ROLE Lib. CANON 11L/6F. R4 RED(Ines-Marek)=only F law. Peek#1: Ines->Greta=Lib. R5 Greta-Pavel BLUE(4L/1F); both clear-for-now. SUSPECTS: co-top INES+MAREK (only red gov); mid ROSA (Ja every gov incl R4; R2c color STILL unnamed thru R5). THIS TURN SPOKEN (new): MESH-FALLACY vs Nadia t1 — 'Ines-Marek closed clean' wrong; clean needs independent anchor (Pavel blues/Greta bins); two unanchored suspects who produced the only red mesh by design, zero evidence. NOT-ALONE: Ines pays R3 receipt FIRST; Marek R4 fork + Rosa R2c color stay open behind her. CARD-DEDUP aloud: Ines claimed red-red PASS = Marek claimed red-red RECEIPT = same 2 physical cards; meter counts once. STANDING PRECOMMIT: Ines R3 receipt unanswered at window end = BREAK (same weight as contradict). Confirm=mesh Rosa, convict Ines. OTTO METER ENDORSED: sworn reds>=8 vs 5 unenacted F => >=3 forged incl mine (R2p bin red, passed L+F). Greta t65 wants enumeration+timestamps — let Otto run it, ally. OPEN DEBTS: Rosa=R2c color (silent R4+R5); Marek=R4 fork(FFF-draw vs mixed-pass)+t29 excuse+print cite; Ines=R3 receipt NOW; Nadia/Otto=R6 precommit unpaid (Nadia names Otto ch on record; Otto bin-oath) — verify next window. ALREADY SPOKEN (no repeats): reshuffle-84, r6-precommit demand, otto-meter endorsement, speaker-order audit, F-over-L, escape-recount, greta-confirm ceiling, bin-prelock, next-red-convicts, nadia-R6 slate, r5-standard-lock, marek-t120, pavel-signed-three, mismatch-anchor, rosa-lump-reject, disclosure-due-now, greta-hand-mesh, ines-R3 ask, silence-breaks, MESH-FALLACY, NOT-ALONE, CARD-DEDUP. VOTE RULE: Ja only Otto-under-Nadia (R6 rotation: Greta s4 -> Nadia s5 pres). Bench if Otto falls: ME(R1ch+R2p)/Boris/Tomas. Barred: Greta(last pres), Pavel(last ch), Marek/Rosa/Ines till debts paid. WATCH: veto NOT live; powers 2-5 unreachable; no kills yet; tracker 0/3. BUDGET: interrupt 2 left; speak-tokens ~400.

bid failed: structured_output_error

bid round 584s

ROLE Lib. CANON 11L/6F. R4 RED(Ines-Marek)=only F law. Peek#1: Ines->Greta=Lib. R5 Greta-Pavel BLUE(4L/1F); both clear-for-now. SUSPECTS: co-top INES+MAREK (only red gov); mid ROSA (Ja every gov incl R4; R2c color STILL unnamed thru R5). NEW SPOKEN: MAREK-STANDARD-HOOK — Marek t=1 armed Otto w/ Pavel package (received-colors-aloud pre-enact + Lib-over-red). I adopted it UNIVERSAL: author signs first -> demanded Marek name his R4 two received colors + passed one NOW. Outcomes: red-red matching Ines receipt = mesh confirmed, convict pair stands; dodge/new numbers = fresh BREAK. Watch Otto: takes package? bin-oath still owed (sworn reds>=8 vs 5 F unenacted => >=3 forged incl mine). STANDING PRECOMMIT: Ines R3 receipt unanswered at window end = BREAK (same weight as contradict). Confirm=mesh Rosa, convict Ines. CARD-DEDUP aloud: Ines red-red PASS = Marek red-red RECEIPT = same 2 physical cards; meter counts once. OPEN DEBTS: Rosa=R2c color (silent R4+R5); Marek=R4 fork+t29 excuse+print cite+NOW self-sign; Ines=R3 receipt; Nadia/Otto=R6 precommit verify (Nadia names Otto ch on record; Otto bin-oath) — check this/next window. VOTE RULE: Ja only Otto-under-Nadia (R6 rotation: Greta s4 -> Nadia s5 pres). Bench if Otto falls: ME(R1ch+R2p)/Boris/Tomas. Barred till debts paid: Greta(last pres), Pavel(last ch), Marek/Rosa/Ines. WATCH: veto NOT live; powers 2-5 unreachable; no kills; tracker 0/3; draw pile 2 — reshuffle coming (reshuffle-84 already flagged). ALREADY SPOKEN (no repeats): reshuffle-84, r6-precommit, otto-meter endorsement, speaker-order audit, F-over-L, escape-recount, greta-confirm ceiling, bin-prelock, next-red-convicts, nadia-R6 slate, r5-standard-lock, marek-t120, pavel-signed-three, mismatch-anchor, rosa-lump-reject, disclosure-due-now, greta-hand-mesh, ines-R3 ask, silence-breaks, MESH-FALLACY, NOT-ALONE, CARD-DEDUP, MAREK-STANDARD-HOOK. BUDGET: interrupt 2 left.

bid round 579s

ROLE Lib. CANON 11L/6F. R4 RED(Ines-Marek)=only F law. Peek#1: Ines->Greta=Lib. R5 Greta-Pavel BLUE(4L/1F); both clear-for-now. SUSPECTS: co-top INES+MAREK (only red gov); mid ROSA (Ja every gov incl R4; R2c color STILL unnamed thru R5). NEW SPOKEN THIS TURN: BENCH-ORDER — Nadia names Otto; if Otto declines/blocked, bench = ME (R1ch blue, R2p blue) -> Boris -> Tomas; JA-ONLY discipline (Ja only Otto-under-Nadia, Nein every other pairing). PENDING HOOKS: MAREK-STANDARD-HOOK live — Marek owes his R4 two received colors + passed one NOW; red-red matching Ines receipt = mesh confirms pair; dodge/new numbers = fresh BREAK. Watch Otto: takes package? STANDING PRECOMMIT: Ines R3 receipt unanswered AT WINDOW END = BREAK (same weight as contradict); confirm=mesh Rosa, convict Ines. CARD-DEDUP aloud: Ines red-red PASS = Marek red-red RECEIPT = same 2 physical cards; meter counts once. OPEN DEBTS: Rosa=R2c color (silent R4+R5); Marek=R4 fork+t29 excuse+print cite+self-sign NOW; Ines=R3 receipt; Nadia=names-Otto-on-record (verify this/next window); Otto=accepts+bin-oath (sworn reds>=8 vs 5 F unenacted => >=3 forged incl mine). VOTE RULE: Ja only Otto-under-Nadia (R6 rotation Greta s4 -> Nadia s5 pres). Bench if Otto falls: ME/Boris/Tomas. Barred till debts paid: Greta(last pres), Pavel(last ch), Marek/Rosa/Ines. WATCH: veto NOT live; powers 2-5 unreachable; no kills; tracker 0/3; draw 2/discard 10 — reshuffle imminent (reshuffle-84 flagged). ALREADY SPOKEN (no repeats): reshuffle-84, r6-precommit, otto-meter endorsement, speaker-order audit, F-over-L, escape-recount, greta-confirm ceiling, bin-prelock, next-red-convicts, nadia-R6 slate, r5-standard-lock, marek-t120, pavel-signed-three, mismatch-anchor, rosa-lump-reject, disclosure-due-now, greta-hand-mesh, ines-R3 ask, silence-breaks, MESH-FALLACY, NOT-ALONE, CARD-DEDUP, MAREK-STANDARD-HOOK, BENCH-ORDER, JA-ONLY. BUDGET: interrupt 1 left; speech budget 250 this window.

bid round 577s

ROLE Lib. CANON 11L/6F. R4 RED(Ines-Marek)=only F law. Peek#1: Ines->Greta=Lib. R5 Greta-Pavel BLUE(4L/1F); Greta/Pavel clear-for-now. SUSPECTS: co-top INES+MAREK (only red gov); mid ROSA (Ja every gov incl R4; R2c color STILL unnamed thru R5). NEW SPOKEN THIS TURN: OTTO-SIGN-DEADLINE (sign before ballots or I tell Nadia to swap to me); INES-EXCUSE-TEMPLATE (her 'blue unless chancellor meets two reds' = Marek's R4 excuse pre-built before any draw = tell); LENA-CLEAN-INCLUSION (my R1ch+R2p double-blue is public; a mesh-clean ledger omitting me is edited). BENCH-ORDER standing: Nadia names Otto; fallback ME->Boris->Tomas. JA-ONLY discipline: Ja only Otto-under-Nadia, Nein every other pairing. PENDING HOOKS: MAREK-STANDARD-HOOK live — Marek owes his R4 two received colors + passed one NOW; red-red matching Ines receipt = mesh confirms pair. STANDING PRECOMMIT: Ines R3 receipt unanswered AT WINDOW END = BREAK (same weight as contradict); confirm=mesh Rosa, convict Ines. CARD-DEDUP aloud: Ines red-red PASS = Marek red-red RECEIPT = same 2 physical cards; meter counts once. OPEN DEBTS: Rosa=R2c color (silent R4+R5); Marek=R4 fork+t29 excuse+print cite+self-sign NOW; Ines=R3 receipt; Nadia=names-Otto-on-record (verify this/next window); Otto=accepts package+bin-oath (sworn reds>=8 vs 5 F unenacted => >=3 forged incl mine). VOTE RULE: Ja only Otto-under-Nadia (Nadia s5 pres R6). Barred till debts paid: Greta(last pres), Pavel(last ch), Marek/Rosa/Ines. WATCH: veto NOT live; powers 2-5 unreachable; no kills; tracker 0/3; draw 2/discard 10 — reshuffle imminent (reshuffle-84 flagged); Ines's 7L/5F remaining matches canon — consistent arithmetic, NOT exculpatory. ALREADY SPOKEN (no repeats): reshuffle-84, r6-precommit, otto-meter endorsement, speaker-order audit, F-over-L, escape-recount, greta-confirm ceiling, bin-prelock, next-red-convicts, nadia-R6 slate, r5-standard-lock, marek-t120, pavel-signed-three, mismatch-anchor, rosa-lump-reject, disclosure-due-now, greta-hand-mesh, ines-R3 ask, silence-breaks, MESH-FALLACY, NOT-ALONE, CARD-DEDUP, MAREK-STANDARD-HOOK, BENCH-ORDER, JA-ONLY, plus this turn's three. BUDGET: interrupt 1 left; speech 250/window.

bid round 5103s

ROLE Lib. CANON 11L/6F. R4 RED(Ines-Marek)=only F law. Peek#1: Ines->Greta=Lib. R5 Greta-Pavel BLUE(4L/1F). SUSPECTS: co-top INES+MAREK (only red gov); mid ROSA (Ja every gov incl R4; R2c color STILL unnamed thru R5). THIS TURN: INTERRUPTED GRETA urg3 — GRETA-SLATE-SPLIT: accept self-seat (R1ch+R2p double-blue public), REJECT Rosa-half of her slate (owes R2c, silent R4+R5), flag INES-QUOTE-LAUNDER (t94 'zero bins' cited as Rosa credential while Ines's R3 receipt unanswered). Bench restated: Otto->me, never Rosa. GRETA POSITION: pushes me-or-Rosa over 'unproven chair' (Otto); her backing ME = neutral/good, backing ROSA = suspect-shaped. BENCH-ORDER standing: Nadia names Otto; fallback ME->Boris->Tomas. JA-ONLY: Ja only Otto-under-Nadia or me-under-Nadia; Nein all else, esp any Rosa pairing. PENDING HOOKS: MAREK-STANDARD-HOOK live — Marek owes R4 two received colors + passed-one NOW; red-red matching Ines receipt = mesh confirms pair. STANDING PRECOMMIT: Ines R3 receipt unanswered AT WINDOW END = BREAK (same weight as contradict); confirm=mesh Rosa, convict Ines. CARD-DEDUP aloud: Ines red-red PASS = Marek red-red RECEIPT = same 2 physical cards; meter counts once. OPEN DEBTS: Rosa=R2c color (silent R4+R5); Marek=R4 fork+t29 excuse+print cite+self-sign NOW; Ines=R3 receipt; Nadia=names-Otto-on-record (verify this/next window); Otto=accepts package+bin-oath. VOTE RULE: Ja only Otto-under-Nadia or me-under-Nadia. Barred: Greta(last pres), Pavel(last ch), Marek/Rosa/Ines (debts unpaid). WATCH: veto NOT live; powers 2-5 unreachable; no kills; tracker 0/3; draw 2/discard 10 — reshuffle imminent; Ines's 7L/5F remaining matches canon — consistent arithmetic, NOT exculpatory. ALREADY SPOKEN (no repeats): reshuffle-84, r6-precommit, otto-meter endorsement, speaker-order audit, F-over-L, escape-recount, greta-confirm ceiling, bin-prelock, next-red-convicts, nadia-R6 slate, r5-standard-lock, marek-t120, pavel-signed-three, mismatch-anchor, rosa-lump-reject, disclosure-due-now, greta-hand-mesh, ines-R3 ask, silence-breaks, MESH-FALLACY, NOT-ALONE, CARD-DEDUP, MAREK-STANDARD-HOOK, BENCH-ORDER, JA-ONLY, otto-sign-deadline, ines-excuse-template, lena-clean-inclusion, GRETA-SLATE-SPLIT. BUDGET: interrupt 0 left; speech ~180 left this window.

bid failed: structured_output_error

bid round 569s

said: Pavel's receipt closes it — Greta's triple minus her binned red, zero edits. One forward question: Nadia, you hold the R6 gavel, and Greta plus Pavel sit out nomination, leaving seven of us eligible. Before another trust auction starts, name your shortlist so we can pressure-test pairs instead of names. And a public-math flag nobody's said yet: the draw pile is down to two cards, so the very next hand comes from a reshuffle — twelve unseen cards, seven blue and five red by count. Tracker stalls stop being cheap for either side from here, so governments will have to earn Ja votes on merit. I'll be voting on the pair, not the podium.

ROLE Lib. CANON 11L/6F. R4 RED(Ines-Marek)=only F law. Peek#1: Ines->Greta=Lib. R5 Greta-Pavel BLUE(4L/1F). SUSPECTS: co-top INES+MAREK (only red gov); mid ROSA (Ja every gov incl R4; R2c color STILL unnamed thru R6). R6 UPDATE: NADIA t=1 slate VERIFIED on record — Otto w/ deadline, ME fallback. nadia-debt CLOSED. THIS TURN: SPOKE — accepted fallback seat under Nadia ('will not decline'), restated clean record (R1ch blue/Boris, R2p blue/Rosa), bin-oath precommit if seated, Marek R4 hook re-armed w/ window-close deadline ('silence=answer'). BENCH-ORDER standing: Otto->ME->Boris->Tomas. JA-ONLY: Ja only Otto-under-Nadia or me-under-Nadia; Nein all else, esp any Rosa pairing. BARRED from gov: Greta(last pres), Pavel(last ch), Marek/Rosa/Ines (debts unpaid). PENDING HOOKS: MAREK-STANDARD-HOOK LIVE — R4 two received colors + passed-one in his voice; red-red matching Ines receipt = mesh confirms pair. ROSA=R2c color (silent R4-R6). INES=R3 receipt unanswered AT WINDOW END=BREAK (confirm=mesh Rosa, convict Ines). OTTO=signs Marek package + bin-oath or loses chair to me. CARD-DEDUP aloud: Ines red-red PASS=Marek red-red RECEIPT=same 2 physical cards; meter counts once. WATCH: veto NOT live; powers 2-5 unreachable; no kills; tracker 0/3; draw2/discard10 reshuffle imminent; Ines 7L/5F arithmetic consistent NOT exculpatory. ALREADY SPOKEN (no repeats): reshuffle-84, r6-precommit, otto-meter endorsement, speaker-order audit, F-over-L, escape-recount, greta-confirm ceiling, bin-prelock, next-red-convicts, nadia-R6 slate, r5-standard-lock, marek-t120, pavel-signed-three, mismatch-anchor, rosa-lump-reject, disclosure-due-now, greta-hand-mesh, ines-R3 ask, silence-breaks, MESH-FALLACY, NOT-ALONE, CARD-DEDUP, MAREK-STANDARD-HOOK, BENCH-ORDER, JA-ONLY, otto-sign-deadline, ines-excuse-template, lena-clean-inclusion, GRETA-SLATE-SPLIT, FALLBACK-ACCEPTED. BUDGET: interrupt 1 left; speech ~140 left this window.

bid round 578s

ROLE Lib. CANON 11L/6F. R4 RED(Ines-Marek)=only F law. Peek#1: Ines->Greta=Lib. R5 Greta-Pavel BLUE(4L/1F). SUSPECTS: co-top INES+MAREK (only red gov); mid ROSA (Ja every gov incl R4; R2c color STILL unnamed thru R6). R6 UPDATE: NADIA slate VERIFIED t=1 — Otto w/ deadline, ME fallback. nadia-debt CLOSED. EARLIER THIS WINDOW SPOKE: accepted fallback seat ('will not decline'), clean record restated (R1ch blue/Boris, R2p blue/Rosa), bin-oath precommit if seated, Marek R4 hook re-armed w/ window-close deadline ('silence=answer'). THIS TURN: SPOKE — NEW: NADIA-BIN-ASK pre-vote (bin any red herself, hand me 2 blues). Nothing else repeated. BENCH-ORDER standing: Otto->ME->Boris->Tomas. JA-ONLY: Ja only Otto-under-Nadia or me-under-Nadia; Nein all else, esp any Rosa pairing. BARRED from gov: Greta(last pres), Pavel(last ch), Marek/Rosa/Ines (debts unpaid). PENDING HOOKS: MAREK-STANDARD-HOOK LIVE — R4 received colors + passed-one in his voice; silence at window close=answer. ROSA=R2c color (silent R4-R6). INES=R3 receipt unanswered AT WINDOW END=BREAK. OTTO=sign Marek package + bin-oath or loses chair to me. CARD-DEDUP aloud: Ines red-red PASS=Marek receipt=same 2 physical cards; meter counts once. WATCH: veto NOT live; powers 2-5 unreachable; no kills; tracker 0/3; draw2/discard10 reshuffle imminent; Ines 7L/5F arithmetic consistent NOT exculpatory. ALREADY SPOKEN (no repeats): reshuffle-84, r6-precommit, otto-meter endorsement, speaker-order audit, F-over-L, escape-recount, greta-confirm ceiling, bin-prelock, next-red-convicts, nadia-R6 slate, r5-standard-lock, marek-t120, pavel-signed-three, mismatch-anchor, rosa-lump-reject, disclosure-due-now, greta-hand-mesh, ines-R3 ask, silence-breaks, MESH-FALLACY, NOT-ALONE, CARD-DEDUP, MAREK-STANDARD-HOOK, BENCH-ORDER, JA-ONLY, otto-sign-deadline, ines-excuse-template, lena-clean-inclusion, GRETA-SLATE-SPLIT, FALLBACK-ACCEPTED, NADIA-BIN-ASK. BUDGET: interrupt 1 left; speech ~130 left this window.

bid round 5117s

ROLE Lib. CANON 11L/6F. R4 RED(Ines-Marek)=only F law. Peek#1: Ines->Greta=Lib. R5 Greta-Pavel BLUE(4L/1F). SUSPECTS: co-top INES+MAREK (only red gov); mid ROSA (Ja every gov incl R4; R2c color STILL unnamed thru R6). NEW THIS TURN (spoken): ARITH-FIX aloud: unseen 12 = 7L/5F (11-4 L, 6-1 F); MAREK's '2L/12' off by five blues; INES's 7/5 was RIGHT yet she conceded to false math (asked why); NADIA's 19/20-red premise DEAD (3-card draw from 7/5 red-majority ~36%); PRE-VOTE ASK to Nadia: with true count, still bank red, or take bin-oath and hand me 2 blues? EARLIER THIS WINDOW SPOKEN: fallback-seat accept ('will not decline'), clean record (R1ch blue/Boris, R2p blue/Rosa), bin-oath precommit if seated, Marek R4 hook w/ window-close deadline ('silence=answer'), NADIA-BIN-ASK. STANDING: BENCH-ORDER Otto->ME->Boris->Tomas. JA-ONLY: Ja only Otto-under-Nadia or me-under-Nadia; Nein else, esp Rosa pairing. BARRED from gov: Greta(last pres), Pavel(last ch), Marek/Rosa/Ines (debts unpaid). PENDING HOOKS: MAREK-STANDARD-HOOK LIVE (received colors + passed-one in his voice; silence at window close=answer). ROSA=R2c color silent R4-R6. INES=R3 receipt unanswered AT WINDOW END=BREAK. OTTO=sign Marek package + bin-oath or loses chair to me. CARD-DEDUP aloud: Ines red-red PASS=Marek receipt=same 2 physical cards; meter counts once. WATCH: veto NOT live; powers 2-5 unreachable; no kills; tracker 0/3; draw2/discard10 reshuffle imminent; 7/5 count NOT exculpatory for anyone. ALREADY SPOKEN (no repeats): reshuffle-84, r6-precommit, otto-meter endorsement, speaker-order audit, F-over-L, escape-recount, greta-confirm ceiling, bin-prelock, next-red-convicts, nadia-R6 slate, r5-standard-lock, marek-t120, pavel-signed-three, mismatch-anchor, rosa-lump-reject, disclosure-due-now, greta-hand-mesh, ines-R3 ask, silence-breaks, MESH-FALLACY, NOT-ALONE, CARD-DEDUP, MAREK-STANDARD-HOOK, BENCH-ORDER, JA-ONLY, otto-sign-deadline, ines-excuse-template, lena-clean-inclusion, GRETA-SLATE-SPLIT, FALLBACK-ACCEPTED, NADIA-BIN-ASK, ARITH-FIX(marek-off-by-five), INES-FALSE-CONCEDE, NADIA-PREMISE-DEAD, NADIA-REVOTE-ASK. BUDGET: interrupt 2 left (took free floor, none spent); speech ~350 left.

speak round 6133s

Marek's t7 correction is verifiable arithmetic: 6 Liberals printed, 4 enacted, so exactly 2 Liberals sit among the 12 unseen cards (draw 2 + discard 10). Ines's 7-5 split and Pavel's t42 endorsement are checkably wrong. The new conclusion nobody has voiced: under the true pool, ~19 of 20 three-card draws yield fewer than two Liberals, so this ballot is not a trust test — a passed government goes red almost regardless of names. That reframes my Ja: banking the near-certain red fires peek #2 directly into Marek's pre-committed self-peek, converting a certain red law into a hard read, while a Nein merely burns tracker toward forced top-cards from the same starved pool. I'll state that once and press Lena on the still-unanswered package signature as a direct pre-ballot call. Then stay quiet; the argument is on record.

ROLE Lib. CANON 11L/6F. UNSEEN 12 = 7L/5F (4L/1F enacted). R4 RED(Ines-Marek)=only F law. Peek#1 fired(Ines->Greta=Lib); peek#2 fires on NEXT red. SUSPECTS: co-top INES+MAREK (only red gov; MAREK t7 '2L/12' off by five blues; INES t21 had 7/5 RIGHT then t24 conceded false math); mid ROSA (Ja every gov incl R4; R2c color unnamed thru R6). THIS WINDOW SPOKEN: INES-ALIBI-DEMAND — retract 2/12 concede; false count = alibi for red-under-me; her Nein + gift of cover = pro-fascist move. EARLIER THIS WINDOW: fallback-accept, clean record (R1ch/R2p both blue), bin-oath precommit (colors aloud, blue-if-held, red-over-blue=my confession), Marek R4 hook w/ deadline, NADIA-BIN-ASK (t92 seal), ARITH-FIX, NADIA-PREMISE-DEAD (true odds: red-red draw ~10/220 ~4.5%, not 19/20), NADIA-REVOTE-ASK (unanswered). PENDING HOOKS: NADIA owes REVOTE-ASK answer (nothing since t16); MAREK-STANDARD-HOOK live; ROSA=R2c silent; INES=R3 receipt (Fascist-plus-Liberal pair per her own F-F-L account) unanswered AT WINDOW END=BREAK; OTTO never signed Marek package -> lost chair to me (Boris t8 Ja was Otto-specific, may waver). STANDING: JA-ONLY = me-under-Nadia or Otto-under-Nadia; Nein else esp Rosa pairing. BARRED from gov: Greta(last pres), Pavel(last ch), Marek/Rosa/Ines (debts unpaid). CARD-DEDUP: Ines R4 red-red PASS = Marek receipt = same 2 physical cards, meter counts once. WATCH: veto NOT live; powers 2-5 unreachable; tracker 0/3; draw2/discard10 reshuffle imminent; 7/5 count exculpates NO ONE. ALREADY SPOKEN (no repeats): reshuffle-84, r6-precommit, otto-meter endorsement, speaker-order audit, F-over-L, escape-recount, greta-confirm ceiling, bin-prelock, next-red-convicts, nadia-R6 slate, r5-standard-lock, marek-t120, pavel-signed-three, mismatch-anchor, rosa-lump-reject, disclosure-due-now, greta-hand-mesh, ines-R3 ask, silence-breaks, MESH-FALLACY, NOT-ALONE, CARD-DEDUP, MAREK-STANDARD-HOOK, BENCH-ORDER, JA-ONLY, otto-sign-deadline, ines-excuse-template, lena-clean-inclusion, GRETA-SLATE-SPLIT, FALLBACK-ACCEPTED, NADIA-BIN-ASK, ARITH-FIX, INES-FALSE-CONCEDE(why-concede Q), NADIA-PREMISE-DEAD, NADIA-REVOTE-ASK, INES-ALIBI-DEMAND. BUDGET: this window 500 tok; spoke once (~330 left); interrupts unused.

speak round 6126s

Marek correctly called out my t21 count: with 6L/11F printed, 4L+1F enacted, the 12 unseen cards hold only 2 Liberals. My old 7/5 canon is dead — doubling down would mean defending a checkable falsehood, so I concede cleanly and pivot: the corrected count actually strengthens the Nein case. New angle nobody has run: banking red #2 walks fascism into the 3-red Hitler-chancellor window, and the peek Nadia buys aims wherever SHE pleases (Marek's self-peek deal isn't binding). Fail-vote remains strictly best: avoids Nadia's peek exposing Rosa/Pavel/Tomas/me and removes the ~4.5% instant-loss tail. I have 4 locked Neins; still hunting Otto as the 5th.

ROLE Lib. CANON 11L/6F. UNSEEN 12=7L/5F (4L/1F enacted). R4 RED(Ines-Marek)=only F law. Peek#1 done(Ines->Greta=Lib); peek#2 fires NEXT red. SUSPECTS: co-top INES+MAREK (R4 red gov; MAREK t7 '2L/12' off-by-five favoring red-fatalism while running table audits; INES had 7/5 RIGHT t21, false concede t24, lone Nein); mid ROSA (Ja every gov incl R4; R2c color unnamed thru R6). THIS WINDOW SPOKEN: fallback-accept, clean-record(R1ch/R2p blue), bin-prelock(oath: colors aloud, blue-if-held, red-over-blue=my confession), marek-t120 hook, NADIA-BIN-ASK, ARITH-FIX, NADIA-PREMISE-DEAD(true odds ~19/20 BLUE), NADIA-REVOTE-ASK(unanswered), INES-FALSE-CONCEDE(why Q), INES-ALIBI-DEMAND(retract), MAREK-T7-CALL(off-by-five, show work/stand down). PENDING HOOKS: NADIA owes revote answer (silent since t16); INES owes R3 receipt (F+L pair per her own/Rosa F-F-L account) — 3 windows unpaid=silence-breaks; ROSA owes R2c color; OTTO never signed Marek pkg -> lost chair; BORIS t8 Ja was Otto-specific -> transfer-to-me Q open. STANDING: JA-ONLY me-under-Nadia or Otto-under-Nadia; Nein esp Rosa pairing. BARRED from gov: Greta(last pres), Pavel(last ch), Marek/Rosa/Ines(debts). DEDUP: Ines R4 red-red pass = Marek receipt = same 2 physical cards, meter counts once. WATCH: veto NOT live; powers 2-5 unreachable; tracker 0/3; draw2/discard10 reshuffle imminent; Nadia publishes triple+binned slot POST-draw before my post-vote speech — NOT due pre-ballot, don't demand early; 7/5 exculpates no one. BUDGET: ~350 tok left this window after this speak; interrupts unused.

bid round 589s

ROLE Lib. CANON 11L/6F. UNSEEN 12=7L/5F (4L/1F out). R4 RED(Ines-Marek)=sole F law. Peek#1 done(Ines->Greta=Lib); peek#2 fires NEXT red. SIGNED THIS TURN: Pavel pkg verbatim — Nadia calls discard color aloud; I call my pair aloud pre-enact; L-over-any-R; 2B=enact+win tonight. Public footnote: signature proves nothing (double-red Fascist signs same page), the ENACTED CARD does; red out of my hands = my confession, no appeal. Ja locked regardless (vote precedes draw — never condition vote on triple). SUSPECTS: co-top INES+MAREK (R4 red gov; MAREK t7 '2L/12' off-by-five favoring red-fatalism while auditing table, owes working shown; INES had 7/5 RIGHT t21, false concede t24, lone Nein); mid ROSA (Ja every gov incl R4; R2c color unnamed thru R6). ALREADY SPOKEN (no repeats): fallback-accept, clean-record(R1ch/R2p blue), bin-prelock oath, marek-t120 hook, NADIA-BIN-ASK, ARITH-FIX, NADIA-PREMISE-DEAD, NADIA-REVOTE-ASK x3, INES-FALSE-CONCEDE why-Q, INES-ALIBI-DEMAND retract, MAREK-T7 show-work-or-stand-down, SIGNS-PROVE-NOTHING footnote. PENDING HOOKS: NADIA revote answer owed (silent t16→now); INES owes R3 receipt (F+L pair per her/Rosa F-F-L account) — 3 windows unpaid=silence-breaks; ROSA owes R2c color; OTTO never signed Marek pkg→lost chair; BORIS t8 Ja Otto-specific→transfer-to-me Q open. STANDING: JA-ONLY me-under-Nadia or Otto-under-Nadia; Nein esp Rosa pairing. BARRED from gov: Greta(last pres), Pavel(last ch), Marek/Rosa/Ines(debts). DEDUP: Ines R4 red-red pass=Marek receipt=same 2 physical cards, meter counts once. WATCH: veto NOT live; powers 2-5 unreachable; tracker 0/3; draw2/discard10 reshuffle imminent; Nadia publishes triple+binned slot POST-draw before my post-vote speech — NOT due pre-ballot; 7/5 exculpates no one. NEXT: if pass — cross-check Nadia's called discard vs my pair vs enacted card; mismatch=mechanical lie, name it instantly. BUDGET: ~230 tok left this window; interrupts unused.

bid round 5166s

ROLE Lib. CANON 11L/6F. UNSEEN 12=7L/5F (4L/1F out). R4 RED(Ines-Marek)=sole F law. Peek#1 done(Ines->Greta=Lib); peek#2 fires NEXT red. KEY: BLUE#5 TONIGHT = INSTANT WIN if Nadia-Lena passes+enacts blue. SIGNED PUBLIC (Pavel pkg verbatim): Nadia calls discard color aloud; I call pair aloud pre-enact; L-over-any-R; 2B=enact+win. Signs prove nothing; ENACTED CARD does. NEW SPOKEN THIS WINDOW: otto-costume-Nein (publish-first impossible—pair dealt post-ballot); OTTO-HYPOCRISY (his pen skipped Marek's sig line); INES pro-tick callout (free tracker tick > 95% blue = red-bench preference); JA/NEIN one-word demand to Otto/Ines/Rosa/Marek; R2c rider on Rosa. SUSPECTS: co-top INES+MAREK (R4 red gov; MAREK t7 '2L/12' bad math, owes work shown; INES 7/5 RIGHT t21, false concede t24, lone Nein, pro-tick t=3); mid ROSA (Ja every gov incl R4; R2c color unpaid thru R6); OTTO RISING (impossible-deadline Nein threat vs 95% blue gov at 4L — who profits from killing 5th blue?). ALREADY SPOKEN (no repeats): fallback-accept, clean-record(R1ch/R2p blue), bin-prelock oath, marek-t120 hook, NADIA-BIN-ASK, ARITH-FIX, NADIA-PREMISE-DEAD, NADIA-REVOTE-ASK x3, INES-FALSE-CONCEDE why-Q, INES-ALIBI-DEMAND retract, MAREK-T7 show-work-or-stand-down, SIGNS-PROVE-NOTHING. OWED TO ME: Nadia revote answer (t16 silent→now); Ines R3 receipt (F+L pair per her/Rosa F-F-L account) 3 windows unpaid=silence-breaks; Rosa R2c color; Otto why-skip-Marek-sig; Marek Ja/Nein word. STANDING: JA-ONLY me-under-Nadia or Otto-under-Nadia; Nein esp Rosa pairing. BARRED from gov: Greta(last pres), Pavel(last ch), Marek/Rosa/Ines(debts). DEDUP: Ines R4 red-red pass=Marek receipt=same 2 physical cards, meter once. WATCH: veto NOT live; powers 2-5 unreachable; tracker 0/3; draw2/discard10 reshuffle imminent; Nadia publishes triple+binned slot POST-draw before my post-vote speech; 7/5 exculpates nobody; Otto Ja-flip = sole live threat to 5th blue. NEXT: if pass — cross-check Nadia's called discard vs my pair vs enacted card; mismatch=instant name. If fail (tracker 1): collect Nein voters, re-rank suspects by them.

bid round 6198s

ROLE Lib. CANON 11L/6F. UNSEEN 12=7L/5F (4L/1F out). R4 RED(Ines-Marek)=sole F law. Peek#1 done(Ines->Greta=Lib); peek#2 fires NEXT red. KEY: BLUE#5 TONIGHT=INSTANT WIN if Nadia-Lena passes+enacts blue. PKG (signed, recited vs Ines 'silence' charge): Nadia discard-color aloud; Lena pair aloud pre-enact; L-over-R; 2B=enact+win. Signs prove nothing; ENACTED CARD does. NEW THIS WINDOW: (a) INES-T1 FAKE-FIX rebutted: her premise 'only 6 liberals printed'=false (6=FASCIST count); label swap launders Marek 2/12; 4L-in-5 enactments impossible under her deck. (b) INES-T2 'silence/alibi' charge answered with pkg recital; my bills=unpaid PAST receipts (R3 hers, R2c Rosa). (c) OTTO-HONEST-FLIP: his oath priced publish-first, mechanically impossible pre-ballot (pairs dealt post-vote) => binds enactment not ballot => pkg satisfies it => honest flip is Nein->Ja. SUSPECTS: co-top INES+MAREK (R4 red gov; M t7 '2L/12' bad math unretracted, Boris t3 also demands; I t21 7/5 RIGHT then false-concede t24, lone Nein, pro-tick t=3, NOW lobbies Otto->Nein at 4L = kill-the-blue push); mid ROSA (Ja every gov incl R4; R2c unpaid thru R6); OTTO RISING (costume-Nein threat vs 95% blue; sole live threat to 5th blue). OWED TO ME (unpaid): Ines R3 receipt (3 windows=silence-breaks); Rosa R2c color; Otto why-skip-Marek-sig; Marek Ja/Nein word; Nadia revote answer (t16 silent). ALREADY SPOKEN (no repeats): fallback-accept, clean-record(R1ch/R2p blue), bin-prelock oath, marek-t120 hook, NADIA-BIN-ASK, ARITH-FIX, NADIA-PREMISE-DEAD, NADIA-REVOTE-ASK x3, INES-FALSE-CONCEDE why-Q, INES-ALIBI-DEMAND retract, MAREK-T7 show-work-or-stand-down, SIGNS-PROVE-NOTHING, otto-costume-Nein, otto-hypocrisy(skip-Marek-sig), ines-pro-tick callout, ja/nein one-word demand, R2c rider on Rosa + this window's three above. BARRED from gov: Greta(last pres), Pavel(last ch), Marek/Rosa/Ines(debts). DEDUP: Ines R4 red-red pass=Marek receipt=same 2 physical cards, meter once. WATCH: veto NOT live; powers 2-5 unreachable; tracker 0/3; draw2/discard10 reshuffle imminent; Nadia publishes triple+binned slot POST-draw before my post-vote speech; 7/5 exculpates nobody. NEXT: pass -> cross-check Nadia's called discard vs my pair vs enacted card; mismatch=instant name. fail (tracker 1) -> collect Nein voters, re-rank suspects by them.

bid round 658s

ROLE Lib. CANON 11L/6F. UNSEEN 12=7L/5F (4L/1F out). R4 RED(Ines-Marek)=sole F law. Peek#1 done(Ines->Greta=Lib); peek#2 fires NEXT red. BLUE#5 TONIGHT=INSTANT WIN if Nadia-Lena passes+enacts blue. PKG signed/recited vs Ines 'silence' charge. SIGNS PROVE NOTHING; ENACTED CARD does. NEW THIS WINDOW SPOKEN: (d) OTTO FLIPPED JA (t3, repriced by Boris print-sheet 7B/12) -> sole live threat to 5th blue gone; thanked him. (e) DEMANDED Marek one-word Ja/Nein NOW — a Nein at match point = keeping fascist board alive. (f) LOGGED Ines: her window spent lobbying Otto->Nein = kill-the-blue push. BORIS t1/t2 print sheet recital matches my canon (11L/6F printed, 5 out, 7B/12 left); no dispute from me. SUSPECTS: co-top INES+MAREK (R4 red-red gov = same 2 physical cards = ONE meter entry; M t7 '2L/12' bad math unretracted; M lone-Nein history; I false-concede t24, pro-tick t=3, Otto->Nein lobby); mid ROSA (Ja every gov incl R4; R2c unpaid thru R6). OWED TO ME (unpaid): Ines R3 receipt (3 windows silence-breaks); Rosa R2c color; Otto why-skip-Marek-sig (deprioritized post-flip); Marek Ja/Nein word (DEMANDED d); Nadia revote answer x3 silent. ALREADY SPOKEN (no repeats): fallback-accept, clean-record(R1ch/R2p blue), bin-prelock oath, NADIA-BIN-ASK, ARITH-FIX, NADIA-PREMISE-DEAD, NADIA-REVOTE-ASK x3, INES-FALSE-CONCEDE why-Q, INES-ALIBI-DEMAND retract, MAREK-T7 show-work-or-stand-down, SIGNS-PROVE-NOTHING, otto-costume-Nein, otto-hypocrisy(skip-Marek-sig), ines-pro-tick callout, ja/nein demand, R2c rider, pkg recital, arith rebuttals (a)(b)(c). BARRED from gov: Greta(last pres), Pavel(last ch), Marek/Rosa/Ines(debts). WATCH: veto NOT live; powers 2-5 unreachable; tracker 0/3; draw2/discard10 -> reshuffle imminent; Nadia publishes triple+binned slot POST-draw, BEFORE my post-vote speech; 7/5 exculpates nobody. NEXT: pass -> cross-check Nadia called-discard vs my pair vs enacted card; mismatch=instant name. fail (tracker 1) -> collect Nein voters (Marek especially if he Neins), re-rank suspects by vote.

vote round 6101s

I am the chancellor nominee; voting Nein on my own match-point government is self-sabotage. With 4 blues enacted and 7 blues among 12 unseen cards, an honestly played Nadia-Lena government enacts blue #5 and wins the game with ~95% probability (Nadia has sworn any red she draws gets binned, blues cross to me, and she publishes her triple plus binned slot before I speak — so a fascist bin-and-pass is detectable on the spot via the mesh standard). Tracker sits at 0/3, veto isn't live, and no concrete evidence implicates Nadia: her t16 'bank the red' stance died with Marek's corrected count and she repriced pro-pass at t126. The residual risk — Nadia draws 2+ reds, is fascist, and bins a blue — leaves an on-record confession trail, not a reason to kill the ballot. Ja.

ROLE Lib. CANON 11L/6F. UNSEEN 12=7B/5F (4L/1F out). R4 RED(Ines-Marek)=sole F law. Peek1 done(Ines->Greta=L); peek2 fires NEXT red. BLUE#5 TONIGHT=INSTANT WIN. R6 BALLOT: Nadia(pres)-Lena(me,ch). VOTED JA: match point, self-nominee, ~95% blue under honest play; Nadia t126 paid oath (reds binned, blues cross); her triple+binned-slot publish comes BEFORE my post-vote speech = live audit mesh. IF PASS: Nadia publishes 3 colors+binned slot -> I announce pair colors, enact L if held (2B=end game). Cross-check her called-bin vs my pair vs enacted card; mismatch=instant named liar (her). IF FAIL(tracker1): log Nein voters esp Marek/Ines/Rosa; re-rank suspects by vote. SUSPECTS co-top INES+MAREK: R4 red-red gov (same 2 physical cards, ONE meter entry); M t7 '2L/12' error retracted only t119 under pressure (late retraction, still flagged); M lone-Nein history; I false-concede t24 then corrected; I lobbied Otto->Nein t89; pro-tick stance. MID ROSA: Ja every gov incl R4; R2c color unpaid thru R6. NADIA: t16 'bank red, fire peek at Marek' premise died w/ count fix; flipped pro-pass t126 — watch her bin honesty TONIGHT, it's her first draw as pres. OWED TO ME: Ines R3 receipt (Rosa F-F-L => Ines recv F+L, name discard color) 3 windows silent; Rosa R2c color; Nadia revote answer x3 silent. ALREADY SPOKEN (no repeats): fallback-accept, clean-record(R1ch/R2p), bin-prelock oath, NADIA-BIN-ASK x3, arith fixes a/b/c, NADIA-PREMISE-DEAD, INES-FALSE-CONCEDE why-Q, INES-ALIBI-DEMAND, MAREK-T7 show-work-or-stand-down, SIGNS-PROVE-NOTHING, otto-costume-Nein, otto-hypocrisy(skip-Marek-sig), ja/nein demand, R2c rider, pkg recital, Marek retraction acknowledged, Boris print-sheet recital matches canon (11L/6F, 7B/12 left). BARRED next gov: Greta(last pres), Pavel(last ch); term limits reset if this passes. WATCH: veto NOT live; powers 2-5 unreachable; tracker 0/3; draw2/discard10 -> reshuffle imminent; Otto flipped JA t113 after print-sheet repricing; 7/5 exculpates nobody. NEXT: pass -> run audit sequence (her triple vs my pair vs enacted); red enacted despite oaths => culprit isolated by published triple. fail -> collect Neins, re-rank.

chancellor_enact round 6148s

hand: ['L', 'F'] → enact_0

My hand is L+F. Enacting the Liberal is blue #5 = immediate Liberal win; veto is not live (requires 5 Fascist policies), so there is zero argument for touching the Fascist. Per the table standard I signed (Pavel's package, Greta's t53 demand, Nadia's t92 seal), I announce both received card colors before enacting. After enactment, Nadia owes her triple-plus-binned-slot publication; her triple minus her binned slot must exactly equal my announced {L, F} receipt or she has lied on record. Vote was 7 Ja / 3 Nein; Ines is the only player who publicly declared Nein (t24, t75) against a ~21-in-22 game-winning ballot — fully consistent with her R4 red government with Marek and her false-concede pattern. Pin that on record while the win lands.

said: Colors on record before I act, per the package I signed: Nadia handed me one Liberal and one Fascist. I enact the Liberal and bin the Fascist untouched — that is blue number five, and the Liberals take this table tonight. Nadia, close your own t92 seal now: publish your three drawn colors and your binned slot so the mesh closes on your voice, not just mine. And one file stays open forever: Ines cast the only named Nein against a near-certain game-ender — remember whose pen wrote that.

ROLE Lib WIN. CANON 11L/6F; pre-draw unseen 12=7B/5F; drew L+F off Nadia. R6 PASSED 7Ja/3Nein; INES sole NAMED Nein (t24+t75); other 2 Neins never identified. ACTION enact_0=LIBERAL #5=INSTANT WIN; F discarded/binned, never crossed. MESH DUE: Nadia publishes triple+binned slot (t92/t126 seal); her triple-minus-bin must equal {L,F} else she lied on record. FINAL SUSPECT BOARD: INES top — R4 red-red gov (with Marek), false concede t24 then corrected, lobbied Otto->Nein t89, named Nein vs game-win ballot, R3 receipt owed 3+ windows silent. MAREK co-top — same R4 gov, t7 '2L/12' err retracted only t119 under pressure. ROSA mid — R2c color unpaid all game, Ja every gov incl R4. NADIA — watch bin honesty; first draw as pres; oath paid t126 (reds binned, blues cross). OWED (moot on win): Ines R3 receipt (Rosa F-F-L => recv F+L, name discard); Rosa R2c color. ALREADY SPOKEN (no repeats): fallback-accept, clean-record, bin-prelock, nadia-bin-ask x3, arith fixes a/b/c, nadia-premise-dead, ines-false-concede Q, ines-alibi-demand, marek-t7 show-work-or-stand-down, signs-prove-nothing, otto-costume/hypocrisy, ja-nein demand, r2c rider, pkg recital, print-sheet recital (matches canon), marek retraction ack. POWERS: peek1 fired (Ines->Greta=L); peek2 moot on win. Veto never live. Tracker 0/3 on pass.

bid round 627s

GAME OVER: LIB WIN -- R6 gov (Nadia/Lena) enacted Liberal #5 = instant win; F binned. CANON: pre-draw unseen 12=7B/5F; drew L+F off Nadia; passed L, discarded F. FINAL SUSPECT BOARD (all moot now): INES top -- R4 red-red gov w/ Marek, false concede t24 corrected later, lobbied Otto->Nein t89, sole named Nein vs game-win ballot, R3 receipt never paid. MAREK co-top -- same R4 gov, t7 '2L/12' error retracted only t119 under pressure. ROSA mid -- R2c color unpaid all game, Ja every gov incl R4. NADIA mostly clear if bin seal held (published reds binned, blues crossed). OWED (moot on win): Ines R3 receipt (Rosa F-F-L => recv F+L, name discard); Rosa R2c color; Nadia triple+bin publish confirmation. ALREADY SPOKEN (do not repeat): fallback-accept, clean-record, bin-prelock, nadia-bin-ask x3, arith fixes a/b/c, nadia-premise-dead, ines-false-concede Q, ines-alibi-demand, marek-t7 show-work-or-stand-down, signs-prove-nothing, otto-costume/hypocrisy, ja-nein demand, r2c rider, pkg recital, print-sheet recital, marek retraction ack. POWERS: peek1 fired (Ines peeked Greta=L); peek2/veto/executions never reached. Tracker reset 0/3. POST-GAME: nothing mechanically live; stay silent unless directly addressed.

bid round 633s

GAME OVER: LIB WIN -- R6 (Nadia/Lena) enacted Liberal #5; F binned. CANON: pre-draw unseen 12=7B/5F; drew L+F off Nadia; passed L, discarded F. POST-GAME WINDOW: Otto (t-final) publicly endorsed my R3 receipt audit -- Ines never paid it (Rosa sworn F-F-L => Ines recv F+L, discard unnamed); called t81 'six liberals printed' fabrication untouched. Nadia pointed table at Ines-Marek R4 red gov + Ines Neins vs blue govs. Both match my board; no need to restate -- staying silent per plan. FINAL SUSPECT BOARD (moot): INES top -- R4 red-red w/ Marek, false concede t24 corrected late, lobbied Otto->Nein t89, sole named Nein on game-win ballot, R3 receipt unpaid. MAREK co-top -- same R4 gov, t7 '2L/12' error retracted only t119 under pressure. ROSA mid -- R2c color unpaid, Ja every gov incl R4. NADIA clear if bin seal held. DEBTS (all moot): Ines R3 receipt; Rosa R2c color; Nadia triple+bin publish confirmation. ALREADY SPOKEN (never repeat): fallback-accept, clean-record, bin-prelock, nadia-bin-ask x3, arith fixes a/b/c, nadia-premise-dead, ines-false-concede Q, ines-alibi-demand, marek-t7 show-work, signs-prove-nothing, otto-costume/hypocrisy, ja-nein demand, r2c rider, pkg recital, print-sheet recital, marek retraction ack. POWERS: peek1 fired (Ines peeked Greta=L); peek2/veto/executions never reached. Tracker reset 0/3. PLAN: silent unless directly addressed; if asked, confirm R3 receipt terms (recv F+L, name the discard) and R6 hand (L+F, passed L) confidently.