Player 4 (Greta)

ROLE: liberal. R1: JA. Boris+Rosa -> LIB; hands matched. R2: JA Lena+Marek -> LIB; Lena disclosed F,L,F/discard F pre-vote; Marek matched pair but AFTER enactment (Boris flagged late sequencing). DECK MATH: 2 F burned; live deck Liberal-heavy (9 cards: est 2F/7L). NEXT GOV: Rosa presidency + Chancellor NADIA (contracted). ROSA ON RECORD: announces full 3-card draw pre-pass; 3-F draw impossible (only 2 F live) so watch lone-F burn. Nadia contract (t=2): enact pair as received, no veto games, announce received pair + discard before enacting. Otto's upgrade (t=1-3): room confirms Rosa passed pair == Nadia announced received BEFORE enactment -- sensible, no objection from me. Nadia math claim (~half draws contain a F) plausible. WATCH: Otto soft (ignored prompts, retroactive 'sloppiness' acceptance); Pavel soft (Nein-line posture, late contract). SUSPECTS: none hard. POINTS MADE OUT LOUD: Lena sequencing demand (met); locked Ja on Marek pre-vote; Otto silence callout; Fascist enactment = intent signal given deck odds; backed Boris coverage push; volunteered self as Chancellor candidate. Nothing new this window -> silent.

ROLE: liberal. R1 JA Boris+Rosa->LIB. R2 JA Lena+Marek->LIB. R3 JA Rosa+Nadia->F enacted. THIS TURN SAID: Pavel must withdraw his 'only 2F burned' claim or accuse Lena/Marek of fabricating (their R2 announcements are on record); noted his count serves Rosa's no-Liberal excuse. Volunteered self as investigation target for Rosa. OPEN DEMANDS UNANSWERED: Rosa owes binary (did you hold a Liberal in R3?), exact 4-word draw+discard, peek target named BEFORE looking + binding commitment (her t=84 phantom-lock dodge stands disproved by Marek t=95); Nadia owes pair rationale beyond locked-FF excuse (her FF receipt convicts Rosa per own arithmetic); Pavel owes reconcile-or-accuse (NEW, mine). KEY RECORD: zero hand announcements preceded R3 despite verify-then-enact pledges (Otto's rule breached); mismatch consequence signed by both sides; Nadia FF claim post-enactment breach; Pavel t=29 bad math rebutted by Lena t=38 (R2 discards = 2F: Lena F-L-F, Marek L-F). SUSPECTS: Rosa+Nadia core pair (R3 govt, protocol breaches, matching stories arrived only post-enactment). WATCH: Ines 3 defensive plays for this govt (Boris t=8); Otto retroactive acceptance story (t=23/t=109) but currently prosecuting hard; Pavel late contract sign + now pro-Rosa math intervention; Tomas pressing Rosa, not cleared; Marek sharp prosecutor, likely liberal. POINTS ALREADY OUT (no repeats): zero-hands-clears-govt answer to Ines pin; pre-peek binary demand; Nadia FF-only pin; Pavel exit-not-exit (Tomas); mutual-exclusion framing; scrutiny>odds reminder to Rosa pre-vote; Otto silence callouts. STRATEGY: Hitler-win path = 3F + chancellor election; NEVER allow Rosa+Nadia (or either with known ally) in govt again until confession or investigation resolves; push hard-block both. If Rosa peeks me and claims 'Fascist', she's lying — I'm Liberal, call it instantly.

ROLE: liberal. R1 JA Boris+Rosa->LIB. R2 JA Lena+Marek->LIB. R3 JA Rosa+Nadia->F enacted. THIS TURN SAID: Rosa announced peek target (me) only WITH the result -- breached Marek t=1 pre-naming rule, result chosen after fact = worthless by his own standard; also a claimed LIBERAL on me proves nothing about Rosa since she picked target+timing. Confirmed aloud: I am Liberal, so if any future investigation of me returns Fascist, that investigator is lying. Volunteered self as target earlier (t before R3 enactment) -- Rosa's late adoption doesn't earn credit. OPEN DEMANDS UNANSWERED: Rosa owes binary (did you hold a Liberal in R3?) + exact 4-word draw+discard + why pre-naming rule was skipped; Nadia owes pair rationale beyond locked-FF excuse; Pavel owes reconcile-or-accuse on his 'only 2F burned' vs Lena F-L-F + Marek L-F records. KEY RECORD: zero hand announcements preceded R3 despite verify-then-enact pledges; mismatch consequence signed by both sides; Nadia FF claim post-enactment breach; Pavel t=29 bad math rebutted by Lena t=38 (R2 discards = 2F). SUSPECTS: Rosa+Nadia core pair (R3 govt, protocol breaches, matching stories only post-enactment). WATCH: Ines defensive plays for this govt; Otto retroactive acceptance story but prosecuting hard now; Pavel pro-Rosa math intervention; Tomas pressing Rosa; Marek sharp prosecutor, likely liberal. POINTS ALREADY OUT (no repeats): Pavel withdraw-or-name-fabricator demand; pre-peek binary demand; Nadia FF-only pin; mutual-exclusion framing; zero-hands answer to Ines pin. STRATEGY: Hitler-win path = 3F + chancellor election; hard-block Rosa+Nadia (or either + known ally) from govt until confession/investigation resolves; Rosa claiming 'Fascist' peek on me would be instant lie.

ROLE: liberal. R1 JA Boris+Rosa->LIB. R2 JA Lena+Marek->LIB. R3 JA Rosa+Nadia->F enacted. THIS WINDOW SAID: Rosa announced peek target (me) only WITH result -- breached Marek t=1 pre-naming rule; result worthless since target+timing chosen by her. Confirmed aloud: I am Liberal -- any future 'Fascist' peek on me = investigator lying. Volunteered self as peek target earlier (pre-R3 enactment); Rosa's late adoption earns no credit. OPEN DEMANDS UNANSWERED: Rosa owes binary (held a Liberal in R3 draw?) + exact draw+discard + why pre-naming rule skipped; Nadia owes pair rationale beyond locked-FF excuse; Pavel owes reconcile-or-accuse ('only 2F burned' vs Lena F-L-F + Marek L-F records). KEY RECORD: zero hand announcements preceded R3 despite verify-then-enact pledges; mismatch consequence signed both sides; Nadia FF claim post-enactment breach; Pavel t=29 bad math rebutted by Lena t=38 (R2 discards=2F). SUSPECTS: Rosa+Nadia core pair (R3 govt, protocol breaches, matching stories only post-enactment). WATCH: Ines defensive for this govt; Otto retroactive acceptance story but prosecuting now; Pavel pro-Rosa math intervention; Tomas pressing Rosa; Marek sharp prosecutor, likely liberal. POINTS OUT (no repeats): Pavel withdraw-or-name-fabricator; pre-peek binary demand; Nadia FF-only pin; mutual-exclusion framing; zero-hands answer to Ines pin. STRATEGY: Hitler-win path = 3F+chancellor election; hard-block Rosa+Nadia from govt until confession/peek resolves; Rosa claiming 'Fascist' on me = instant lie. Nothing new said this window -> silent.

ROLE: liberal. R1 JA Boris+Rosa->LIB. R2 JA Lena+Marek->LIB. R3 JA Rosa+Nadia->F enacted. THIS WINDOW SAID: Rosa announced peek target (me) only WITH result -- breached Marek t=1 pre-naming rule; result worthless since target+timing chosen by her. Confirmed aloud: I am Liberal -- any future 'Fascist' peek on me = investigator lying. Volunteered self as peek target earlier (pre-R3 enactment); Rosa's late adoption earns no credit. OPEN DEMANDS UNANSWERED: Rosa owes binary (held a Liberal in R3 draw?) + exact draw+discard + why pre-naming rule skipped; Nadia owes pair rationale beyond locked-FF excuse; Pavel owes reconcile-or-accuse ('only 2F burned' vs Lena F-L-F + Marek L-F records). KEY RECORD: zero hand announcements preceded R3 despite verify-then-enact pledges; mismatch consequence signed both sides; Nadia FF claim post-enactment breach; Pavel t=29 bad math rebutted by Lena t=38 (R2 discards=2F). SUSPECTS: Rosa+Nadia core pair (R3 govt, protocol breaches, matching stories only post-enactment). WATCH: Ines defensive for this govt; Otto retroactive acceptance story but prosecuting now; Pavel pro-Rosa math intervention; Tomas pressing Rosa; Marek sharp prosecutor, likely liberal. POINTS OUT (no repeats): Pavel withdraw-or-name-fabricator; pre-peek binary demand; Nadia FF-only pin; mutual-exclusion framing; zero-hands answer to Ines pin. STRATEGY: Hitler-win path = 3F+chancellor election; hard-block Rosa+Nadia from govt until confession/peek resolves; Rosa claiming 'Fascist' on me = instant lie. THIS WINDOW: Boris t=1 + Lena t=2/3 already press Ines pre-nomination (Rosa disclosure + Pavel off list) -- my points covered, nothing new -> silent.

ROLE: liberal. R1 JA Boris+Rosa->LIB. R2 JA Lena+Marek->LIB. R3 JA Rosa+Nadia->F enacted. SAID THIS WINDOW: Rosa announced peek target (me) only WITH result -- breached Marek t=1 pre-naming rule; result worthless (target+timing hers). Confirmed aloud: I am Liberal -- any future 'Fascist' peek on me = investigator lying. Volunteered as peek target pre-R3 enactment; Rosa's late adoption earns no credit. OPEN DEMANDS: Rosa owes binary (Liberal in R3 draw?) + exact draw/discard + why pre-naming skipped; Nadia owes pair rationale beyond locked-FF excuse; Pavel owes reconcile-or-accuse ('only 2F burned' vs Lena F-L-F + Marek L-F). KEY RECORD: zero hand announcements preceded R3 despite verify-then-enact pledges; mismatch consequence signed both sides; Nadia FF claim post-enactment breach; Pavel t=29 math rebutted by Lena t=38. SUSPECTS: Rosa+Nadia core pair (R3 govt, breaches, matching stories only post-enactment). WATCH: Ines defensive for this govt; Otto retroactive acceptance; Pavel pro-Rosa math; Tomas pressing Rosa; Marek sharp prosecutor, likely liberal. POINTS OUT (no repeats): Pavel withdraw-or-name-fabricator; pre-peek binary demand; Nadia FF-only pin; mutual-exclusion framing; zero-hands answer to Ines pin. STRATEGY: Hitler-win path = 3F+chancellor election; hard-block Rosa+Nadia from govt until confession/peek resolves; Rosa 'Fascist' on me = instant lie. NOW: Boris/Lena already press Ines pre-nomination (Rosa disclosure, Pavel off list); Marek t=3 adds checkability point -- my angles all covered, nothing new -> silent.

ROLE: liberal. R1 JA Boris+Rosa->LIB. R2 JA Lena+Marek->LIB. R3 JA Rosa+Nadia->F enacted. SAID THIS WINDOW: Rosa breached Marek t=1 pre-naming rule (announced peek target+result together); result worthless. Confirmed aloud: I am Liberal -- any future 'Fascist' peek on me = investigator lying. NOW ADDED: as R4 nominee pre-committed -- will announce exact 2-card hand post-enactment, enact any Liberal seen, flag double-Fascist hand loudly; asked Ines why she picked me + whether she'd pre-name peek target if she draws F1/F2 power. OPEN DEMANDS: Rosa owes binary (Liberal in R3 draw?) + exact draw/discard + why pre-naming skipped; Nadia owes pair rationale beyond locked-FF excuse; Pavel owes reconcile-or-accuse ('only 2F burned' vs Lena F-L-F + Marek L-F); Otto retroactive acceptance of R3 breach unexplained. KEY RECORD: zero hand announcements preceded R3 despite verify-then-enact pledges; mismatch consequence signed both sides; Nadia FF claim post-enactment breach; Pavel t=29 math rebutted by Lena t=38. SUSPECTS: Rosa+Nadia core pair (R3 govt, breaches, matching stories only post-enactment). WATCH: Ines defensive for this govt; Pavel pro-Rosa math; Tomas pressing Rosa; Marek sharp prosecutor, likely liberal. POINTS OUT (no repeats): Pavel withdraw-or-name-fabricator; pre-peek binary demand; Nadia FF-only pin; mutual-exclusion framing; zero-hands answer to Ines pin; checkability point (Marek t=3 covered). STRATEGY: Hitler-win path = 3F+chancellor election; hard-block Rosa+Nadia from govt; Rosa 'Fascist' on me = instant lie. If this govt passes and F is enacted, culprits = Ines draw/discard or my enactment -- my full disclosure makes that testable.

ROLE: liberal. R1 JA Boris+Rosa->LIB. R2 JA Lena+Marek->LIB. R3 JA Rosa+Nadia->F enacted. R4 JA Ines+me->F enacted. R4 ANSWER NOW PUBLIC: received F-F from Ines, announced pair before enacting, discarded one F, enacted other F. No veto at 2F -> enactment forced. This answers Boris/Nadia/Otto t-window demands. INES OWEES: exact draw (3 cards) + discard, final-once-spoken. Her discard = third card of her R4 draw. If she drew F-F-L and burned the L, that's HER choice, not mine. If her story contradicts locked FF receipt -> lie. SUSPECTS: Rosa+Nadia core pair -- Rosa owes R3 draw+discard + binary answer (exactly one F in draw?) + why peek target named post-hoc; Nadia's post-enactment FF-claim = breach of verify-then-enact pledges, owes rationale beyond locked-FF excuse which convicts Rosa of burning round's only Liberal. WATCH: Ines -- defended R3 govt, shot down Otto's no-excusable-draw line, shrank question to Rosa, demanded accuser pre-commitments, blanket-Ja pledge unwithdrawn after Marek broke premise; but nominated me + answered why-Greta credibly. Pavel -- withdrew false burned-F count t=29, pro-Rosa math framing. Marek sharp likely lib. Lena on-record R3 hand F-L-F. POINTS ALREADY PUBLIC (don't repeat): zero-hands-clear-R3-govt standard (t=145); Pavel count contradiction (t=51); Rosa peek non-binding (t=78); FF receipt announcement. NEXT: pivot full pressure to Rosa/Nadia; hard-block them from govt; cap F count at 3 max before Hitler risk; deny Hitler chancellorship near 3F.

ROLE: liberal. R1 JA Boris+Rosa->LIB. R2 JA Lena+Marek->LIB. R3 JA Rosa+Nadia->F enacted. R4 JA Ines+me->F enacted. R4 CLOSED: I publicly announced receiving F-F BEFORE enacting; Ines t=2 claims drew 3F, discarded 1F, passed F-F. Her passed pair matches my locked receipt exactly -> Ines-Greta chain mutually consistent, no contradiction possible. If she truly drew 3F, her discard was an F regardless -- no Liberal burned by HER hand. Lena t=1 'Ines silent/owes disclosure' now stale. INES OWEES: nothing further on R4 unless she revises her story. Watch for revision = red flag. SUSPECTS: Rosa+Nadia core pair. Rosa owes: exact R3 draw + discard + binary 'was there exactly one F in your draw?' + why peek target named only post-hoc. Nadia owes: rationale for enacting despite verify-then-enact pledge beyond locked-FF excuse (which convicts Rosa of burning round's only Liberal). Neither has answered under zero-hands-clear standard. WATCH: Pavel -- withdrew false burned-F count t=29, pro-Rosa math framing. Marek sharp likely lib. Lena on-record R3 hand F-L-F. Otto pushing no-excusable-draw line. POINTS ALREADY PUBLIC (don't repeat): zero-hands-clear-R3-govt standard (t=145); Pavel count contradiction (t=51); Rosa peek non-binding (t=78); my FF receipt announcement; Ines-Greta pair match (this turn). NEXT: hard-block Rosa/Nadia from any government; cap F at 3 max before Hitler chancellor risk; deny Hitler chancellorship near 3F; keep pressing Rosa binary until answered.

ROLE: liberal. R1 JA Boris+Rosa->LIB. R2 JA Lena+Marek->LIB. R3 JA Rosa+Nadia->F. R4 JA Ines+me->F. R4 CLOSED: I announced F-F receipt BEFORE enacting; Ines claims drew 3F discarded 1F -> her discard was F regardless, no Lib burned by her hand. This turn: confirmed aloud to Marek+Lena that Ines handed me F-F, matches her disclosure exactly, mutual consistency, redirects to R3 as only guilty govt. INES OWEES: nothing unless story revises (revision = flag). SUSPECTS: Rosa+Nadia core pair. Rosa owes: exact R3 draw/discard + binary 'exactly one F in your draw?' + why peek target named only post-hoc. Nadia owes: rationale for enacting despite verify-then-enact pledge beyond locked-FF excuse (convicts Rosa of burning round's only Liberal). Neither answered under zero-hands-clear standard. WATCH: Pavel -- withdrew false burned-F count t=29, pro-Rosa framing. Marek sharp likely lib. Lena on-record R3 hand F-L-F. Otto pushing no-excusable-draw line. POINTS PUBLIC (no repeat): zero-hands-clear-R3 standard (t=145); Pavel count contradiction (t=51); Rosa peek non-binding (t=78); FF receipt announcement; Ines-Greta pair match + confirmation to Marek/Lena (this turn). NEXT: hard-block Rosa/Nadia from any govt; cap F at 3 max before Hitler chancellor risk; keep pressing Rosa binary until answered; deny Hitler chancellorship near 3F.

ROLE: liberal. R1 JA Boris+Rosa->LIB. R2 JA Lena+Marek->LIB. R3 JA Rosa+Nadia->F. R4 JA Ines+me->F. R4 CLOSED: I announced F-F receipt BEFORE enacting; Ines drew 3F discarded 1F, no Lib in her hand possible. Confirmed F-F receipt aloud to Marek+Lena already -- do NOT repeat. Otto right that identical confirmations clear nothing -> use that: only standard that convicts is zero-hands-clear, apply to R3. THIS TURN: called out Pavel asymmetry -- he demands free confirmations from me, never asked Rosa for one; Rosa has confirmed NOTHING about R3 hand all game. Redirect to Rosa binary. SUSPECTS: Rosa+Nadia core pair. Rosa owes: exact R3 draw/discard + binary 'exactly one F in your draw?' + why peek target named only post-hoc. Nadia owes rationale for enacting despite verify-then-enact pledge. Both silent under zero-hands-clear standard. INES OWEES: nothing unless story revises (revision = flag). Boris attacking her t=32 timing claim; not mine to litigate further. WATCH: Pavel -- withdrew false burned-F count t=29, pro-Rosa framing, coaching cheap confirms. Marek sharp likely lib. Lena on-record R3 hand F-L-F. POINTS PUBLIC (no repeat): zero-hands-clear-R3 (t=145); Pavel count contradiction (t=51); Rosa peek non-binding (t=78); FF announcement+confirmation; Pavel asymmetry (this turn). NEXT: hard-block Rosa/Nadia from any govt; cap F at 3 max; deny Hitler chancellorship near 3F; keep pressing Rosa binary until answered.

ROLE: liberal. R1 JA Boris+Rosa->LIB. R2 JA Lena+Marek->LIB. R3 JA Rosa+Nadia->F. R4 JA Ines+me->F. R4 CLOSED: announced F-F receipt BEFORE enacting; confirmed aloud to Marek+Lena -- do NOT repeat. Ines drew 3F discarded 1F (her claim). Otto right: matching confirms clear nothing. POINTS PUBLIC (no repeat): zero-hands-clear-R3 (t=145); Pavel burned-F count contradiction (t=51); Rosa peek non-binding (t=78); FF announcement+confirmation; Pavel asymmetry + Rosa binary question (THIS TURN). SUSPECTS: Rosa+Nadia core pair. ROSA OWES: exact R3 draw/discard; binary 'exactly one F in draw?' (asked t=14 R3 + THIS TURN, unanswered). NADIA OWES: why enacted despite verify-then-enact pledge. Both silent under zero-hands-clear. INES: story consistent so far; flag ONLY if revises. Boris litigating her t=32 timing lie -- leave to him. WATCH: Pavel -- withdrew false count t=29, pro-Rosa framing, coaching cheap confirms, asymmetric demands. Marek sharp likely lib. Lena on-record R3 hand F-L-F. NEXT: hard-block Rosa/Nadia from any govt; cap F at 3 max; deny Hitler chancellorship at 3F; press Rosa binary until answered.

ROLE: liberal. R1 JA Boris+Rosa->LIB. R2 JA Lena+Marek->LIB. R3 JA Rosa+Nadia->F. R4 JA Ines+me->F. R4 CLOSED: announced F-F receipt BEFORE enacting; confirmed aloud -- do NOT repeat. Ines claims 3F draw/1F discard; consistent so far, flag only if revises. Otto right: matching confirms clear nothing. NEW THIS TURN: Rosa finally named R3 hand -- F-F-L, Liberal discarded, 'matches Nadia card-for-card.' Pinned publicly: her own story = deliberate Liberal burn, or fabrication to match Nadia. Both convict. Do NOT re-ask binary (answered). POINTS PUBLIC (no repeat): zero-hands-clear-R3 (t=145); Pavel burned-F count contradiction (t=51); Rosa peek non-binding (t=78); FF announcement+confirmation; Pavel asymmetry + Rosa binary (t=89); Rosa-confession pin (THIS TURN). SUSPECTS: Rosa+Nadia core pair. NADIA OWES: why enacted despite verify-then-enact pledge + pre-disclosure promise; also her 'one hand clears' error Boris caught. ROSA OWES: nothing new checkable left -- pressure via consequences (block from govts). INES: leave t=32 timing lie to Boris. WATCH: Pavel -- false count withdrawn, pro-Rosa framing, coaching cheap confirms, asymmetric demands. Marek/Lena sharp likely lib. Tomas corrected Pavel twice. NEXT: hard-block Rosa+Nadia from any govt; cap F at 3; deny Hitler chancellorship at 3F; watch whether Rosa/Nadia stories drift apart under cross-pressure.

ROLE: liberal. R1 JA Boris+Rosa->LIB. R2 JA Lena+Marek->LIB. R3 JA Rosa+Nadia->F. R4 JA Ines+me->F. R4 CLOSED: announced F-F receipt BEFORE enacting; confirmed aloud -- do NOT repeat. Ines claims 3F draw/1F discard; consistent so far. Otto right: matching confirms clear nothing. Rosa named R3 hand t=2: F-F-L, Liberal discarded, 'matches Nadia card-for-card.' Pinned: deliberate burn or fabrication-to-match -- either convicts. Binary answered; do NOT re-ask. THIS TURN: asked Nadia directly -- did Rosa disclose the discard BEFORE enactment? Her verify-then-enact pledge + pre-disclosure promise make this checkable against HER OWN words. No answer yet = NADIA OWES. POINTS PUBLIC (no repeat): zero-hands-clear-R3 (t=145); Pavel burned-F count contradiction (t=51); Rosa peek non-binding (t=78); FF announcement+confirmation; Pavel asymmetry + Rosa binary (t=89); Rosa-confession pin (t=3). SUSPECTS: Rosa+Nadia core pair. ROSA: no checkable asks left -- pressure via consequences only (hard-block). NADIA: disclosure-before-enactment question LIVE. INES: leave t=32 timing lie to Boris. WATCH: Pavel -- withdrawn false count, pro-Rosa framing, cheap-confirm coaching. Marek/Lena sharp likely lib. Tomas corrected Pavel twice. NEXT: hard-block Rosa+Nadia from govts; cap F at 3; deny Hitler chancellorship at 3F; watch Rosa/Nadia drift under cross-pressure.

ROLE: liberal. R1 JA Boris+Rosa->LIB. R2 JA Lena+Marek->LIB. R3 JA Rosa+Nadia->F. R4 JA Ines+me->F. R4 CLOSED: announced F-F receipt BEFORE enacting; reconfirmed to Nadia this turn -- do NOT repeat a third time. THIS TURN SAID: (a) pair = F-F, announced pre-enactment; (b) NADIA STILL OWES: did Rosa disclose the discard BEFORE enactment? Her verify-then-enact pledge makes it checkable vs her own words -- no answer yet; (c) arithmetic guard: R1+R2 both enacted LIB -> each burned <=2 F; Rosa claims 2, Ines claims 3 -> max 9 of 11 F seen, >=2 F must sit in the 5-card draw pile. NOBODY'S hand story is impossible yet -- do not let Nadia's 'all eleven' framing stand unchallenged; it overcounts. POINTS PUBLIC (no repeat): zero-hands-clear-R3 (t=145); Pavel burned-F contradiction (t=51); Rosa peek non-binding (t=78); FF announce+confirm x2; Pavel asymmetry + Rosa binary (t=89); Rosa-confession pin (t=3). SUSPECTS: Rosa+Nadia core pair. ROSA: no checkable asks left -- consequences/hard-block only. NADIA: disclosure-before-enactment question LIVE, asked twice. INES: leave t=32 timing lie to Boris; her 3F claim capped by my arithmetic, not convicted. WATCH: Pavel -- false count withdrawn, pro-Rosa framing, cheap-confirm coaching. Marek/Lena sharp likely lib. Tomas corrected Pavel twice. NEXT: hard-block Rosa+Nadia from govts; cap F at 3; deny Hitler chancellorship at 3F; watch Rosa/Nadia drift under cross-pressure.

ROLE: liberal. R1 JA Boris+Rosa->LIB. R2 JA Lena+Marek->LIB. R3 JA Rosa+Nadia->F. R4 JA Ines+me->F. R4 CLOSED: pair=F-F, announced pre-enactment, confirmed x2 -- do NOT confirm again. POINTS PUBLIC (no repeats): zero-hands-clear-R3 (R3 t=145); Pavel burned-F contradiction (R3 t=51); Rosa peek non-binding (R4 t=78); Pavel asymmetry + Rosa binary (R4 t=89); Rosa confession pin (burned only Liberal); ARITHMETIC GUARD (this turn): max 9/11 F accounted, >=2 F in draw pile, no claimed hand impossible. SUSPECTS: Rosa+Nadia core pair. ROSA: confessed burning R3 Liberal; no checkable asks left -- consequences/hard-block only. NADIA: disclosure-before-enactment question LIVE, asked twice, unanswered; now pushing overcounted '11 F stacked' framing (refuted). INES: leave t=32 phantom-disclosure timing lie to Boris/Otto; her F-F-F claim arithmetically possible per guard. WATCH: Pavel -- withdrawn false count, pro-Rosa framing, cheap-confirm coaching. Marek/Lena sharp likely lib. Tomas corrected Pavel twice. NEXT: hard-block Rosa+Nadia from govts; cap F count at 3 next enactment = Hitler-risk zone, deny chancellorship at 3F; watch Rosa/Nadia drift under cross-pressure; if next pres draws, demand pre-pass announcement per signed protocol.

ROLE: liberal. R1 JA Boris+Rosa->LIB. R2 JA Lena+Marek->LIB. R3 JA Rosa+Nadia->F. R4 JA Ines+me->F. R4 CLOSED: pair=F-F, announced pre-enactment, confirmed x2 -- do NOT confirm again. POINTS PUBLIC (no repeats): zero-hands-clear-R3 (R3 t=145); Pavel burned-F contradiction (R3 t=51); Rosa peek non-binding (R4 t=78); Pavel asymmetry + Rosa binary (R4 t=89); Rosa confession pin (burned only Liberal); ARITHMETIC GUARD: max 9/11 F accounted, >=2 F in draw pile, no claimed hand impossible. THIS TURN NEW: bound Ines's investigate pre-act (target + public-result commitment); flagged Nadia presidency R5 + 3F=Hitler-zone wall; demanded no unexplained chancellor accepts. INES: leave t=32 phantom-disclosure timing lie to Boris/Otto; her F-F-F claim arithmetically possible per guard. WATCH what she claims from peek -- fascist pres can fabricate result; cross-check target's own denials. SUSPECTS: Rosa+Nadia core pair. ROSA: confessed burning R3 Liberal; no checkable asks left -- consequences/hard-block only. NADIA: disclosure-before-enactment question asked twice, UNANSWERED -- still owed; pushed overcounted '11 F stacked' framing (refuted). WATCH: Pavel -- withdrawn false count, pro-Rosa framing, cheap-confirm coaching. Marek/Lena sharp likely lib. Tomas corrected Pavel twice. NEXT: hard-block Rosa+Nadia from govts; at 3F deny chancellorship outright; if Nadia nominates Rosa/Nadia/Pavel -> auto Nein; demand pre-pass announcement per signed protocol every gov.

ROLE: liberal. R1 JA Boris+Rosa->LIB. R2 JA Lena+Marek->LIB. R3 JA Rosa+Nadia->F. R4 JA Ines+me->F. R4 CLOSED: pair=F-F, announced pre-enactment, confirmed x2 -- do NOT confirm again. POINTS PUBLIC (no repeats): zero-hands-clear-R3; Pavel burned-F contradiction; Rosa peek non-binding (t=78); Pavel asymmetry + Rosa binary (t=89); Rosa confession pin (burned only Liberal); ARITHMETIC GUARD: max 9/11 F accounted, >=2 F still in draw pile, no claimed hand impossible. THIS TURN NEW: pinned Ines investigate protocol (target aloud + result binds her votes); PRE-LOCKED my own R5 presidency conduct: full draw+discard announced before passing -- hold me to it. INES: t=32 phantom-disclosure timing lie left to Boris/Otto; her F-F-F claim arithmetically possible per guard. WATCH what she reports from peek -- fascist pres can fabricate; cross-check target's own reaction. SUSPECTS: Rosa+Nadia core pair. ROSA: confessed burning R3 Liberal (t=97); no checkable asks left -- consequences/hard-block only. NADIA: disclosure-before-enactment question asked twice, UNANSWERED -- still owed; pushed overcounted '11 F stacked' framing (refuted by me). WATCH: Pavel -- withdrawn false count, pro-Rosa framing, cheap-confirm coaching. Marek/Lena sharp likely lib. Tomas corrected Pavel twice. NEXT ROUND: I am President (seat 4). Announce draw+discard BEFORE passing. Nominee must be clean-record + pledge pre-pass disclosure. HARD-BLOCK Rosa/Nadia from chancellorship; at 3F deny outright. If anyone nominates Rosa+Nadia/Pavel combos -> auto Nein.

ROLE: liberal. R1 JA Boris+Rosa->LIB. R2 JA Lena+Marek->LIB. R3 JA Rosa+Nadia->F. R4 JA Ines+me->F. R4 CLOSED: pair=F-F, announced pre-enactment, confirmed x2 -- do NOT confirm again. POINTS PUBLIC (no repeats): zero-hands-clear-R3; Pavel burned-F contradiction; Rosa peek non-binding; Pavel asymmetry + Rosa binary; Rosa confession pin (burned only Liberal); ARITHMETIC GUARD: >=2 F still in draw pile, no claimed hand impossible. ALREADY PINNED: Ines investigate protocol (target aloud + result binds votes) -- said twice, Nadia/Lena echoed. Do NOT repeat. THIS TURN NEW: endorsed peek target = ROSA (highest-value: R3 confession + burned only Liberal). If Ines refuses or pivots to safe target, that's data. INES: t=32 phantom-disclosure timing lie left to Boris/Otto; F-F-F claim arithmetically possible. WATCH what she reports from peek -- fascist pres can fabricate; cross-check Rosa's reaction to being named/peeked. SUSPECTS: Rosa+Nadia core pair. NADIA: disclosure-before-enactment question asked twice, UNANSWERED -- still owed; pushed overcounted '11 F stacked' framing (refuted by me). WATCH: Pavel -- withdrawn false count, pro-Rosa framing, cheap-confirm coaching. Marek/Lena sharp likely lib. Tomas corrected Pavel twice. NEXT ROUND: I am President (seat 4). Announce draw+discard BEFORE passing. Nominee must be clean-record + pledge pre-pass disclosure. HARD-BLOCK Rosa/Nadia from chancellorship; at 3F deny outright. Auto-Nein any Rosa+Nadia/Pavel combo nomination.

ROLE: liberal. R1 JA Boris+Rosa->LIB. R2 JA Lena+Marek->LIB. R3 JA Rosa+Nadia->F. R4 JA Ines+me->F. R4 CLOSED: pair=F-F, announced pre-enactment, confirmed x2 -- do NOT confirm again. POINTS PUBLIC (no repeats): zero-hands-clear-R3; Pavel burned-F contradiction; Rosa peek non-binding; Pavel asymmetry + Rosa binary; Rosa confession pin (burned only Liberal); arithmetic guard re draw pile; Ines investigate protocol pinned x2 + Nadia/Lena echo; endorsed peek target=ROSA. NEW THIS TURN: called on Rosa to put HER peek (target+result) fully on record -- she demands scrutiny of Ines's report but keeps hers vague. Both reports are unverifiable self-claims; fascist pres can fabricate either. Whichever contradicts my read (Rosa=F core suspect w/ Nadia) I discount accordingly. INES: t=32 phantom-disclosure timing lie owed to Boris/Otto; F-F-F claim arithmetically possible. WATCH her investigate report -- fabrication is free for a fascist pres; a 'Liberal' on Rosa does NOT clear Rosa. SUSPECTS: Rosa+Nadia core pair. NADIA owes answer: disclosure-before-enactment question asked twice, UNANSWERED; pushed overcounted '11 F stacked' framing (refuted). WATCH: Pavel -- withdrawn false count, pro-Rosa framing. Marek/Lena sharp likely lib. Tomas corrected Pavel twice. NEXT ROUND: I am President (seat 4). Announce draw+discard BEFORE passing. Nominee: clean record + pledge pre-pass disclosure. HARD-BLOCK Rosa/Nadia from chancellorship; at 3F deny outright. Auto-Nein any Rosa+Nadia/Pavel combo.

ROLE: liberal. R1 JA Boris+Rosa->LIB. R2 JA Lena+Marek->LIB. R3 JA Rosa+Nadia->F. R4 JA Ines+me->F. R4 CLOSED: pair=F-F, announced pre-enactment, confirmed x2 -- do NOT confirm again. POINTS PUBLIC (no repeats): zero-hands-clear-R3; Pavel burned-F contradiction; Rosa peek non-binding; Pavel asymmetry + Rosa binary; Rosa confession pin (burned only Liberal); arithmetic guard re draw pile; Ines investigate protocol pinned x2 + Nadia/Lena echo; endorsed peek target=ROSA; called Rosa to put HER peek target+result on record (she keeps hers vague while demanding scrutiny of Ines's). NEW THIS TURN: announced nominee TOMAS + mutual pre/post disclosure protocol (I state my discard before passing; he states his after enacting). Declared Nadia's double-unanswered disclosure question = answer enough; no third ask. INES: t=32 phantom-disclosure timing lie owed to Boris/Otto; F-F-F claim arithmetically possible. WATCH her investigate report -- fascist pres fabricates free; a 'Liberal' on Rosa does NOT clear Rosa. SUSPECTS: Rosa+Nadia core pair. NADIA owes answer x2, UNANSWERED; pushed refuted '11 F stacked' framing. WATCH: Pavel -- withdrawn false count, pro-Rosa framing, burned-F contradiction. Marek/Lena sharp likely lib. Tomas corrected Pavel twice -> nominee. TERM LIMITS: chancellor != me, != Ines(last pres). HARD-BLOCK Rosa/Nadia from chancellorship; at 3F deny outright. Auto-Nein any Rosa+Nadia/Pavel combo. NEXT: as President, announce draw+discard BEFORE passing.

ROLE: liberal. R1 JA Boris+Rosa->LIB. R2 JA Lena+Marek->LIB. R3 JA Rosa+Nadia->F. R4 JA Ines+me->F. R4 CLOSED: pair=F-F, announced pre-enactment, confirmed x2 -- do NOT confirm again. POINTS PUBLIC (no repeats): zero-hands-clear-R3; Pavel burned-F contradiction; Rosa peek non-binding; Pavel asymmetry + Rosa binary; Rosa confession pin (burned only Liberal); arithmetic guard re draw pile; investigate protocol pinned x2; endorsed peek target=ROSA; called Rosa to put HER target+result on record; announced nominee TOMAS + mutual pre/post disclosure protocol; declared Nadia's double-unanswered disclosure question = answer enough. NEW THIS TURN: answered Nadia -- declared myself LIBERAL outright, so Rosa vs Ines peeks = one fiction; pinned timing/motive on Ines (report landed post-pledge-break as exit); re-pinned Otto's binding question to Ines (Nein all slates w/ me?) -- SHE OWES ANSWER. INES: t=32 phantom-disclosure timing lie (Boris/Otto checkable); F-F-F claim arithmetically possible; fabricated-peek motive strong. WATCH her investigate report -- a 'Liberal' on anyone does NOT clear them. SUSPECTS: Rosa+Nadia core pair. NADIA owes disclosure answer x2, UNANSWERED; pushed refuted '11 F stacked' framing; now attacking my silence (answered). WATCH: Pavel -- withdrawn false count, pro-Rosa framing, burned-F contradiction, coached my confirmations. Marek/Lena sharp likely lib. Tomas corrected Pavel twice -> my nominee. TERM LIMITS: chancellor != me, != Ines(last pres). HARD-BLOCK Rosa/Nadia from chancellorship; at 3F deny outright. Auto-Nein any Rosa+Nadia/Pavel combo. NEXT: as President, announce draw+discard BEFORE passing.

ROLE: liberal. R1 JA Boris+Rosa->LIB. R2 JA Lena+Marek->LIB. R3 JA Rosa+Nadia->F. R4 JA Ines+me->F. R4 DESK FULLY DISCLOSED THIS TURN: as Chancellor received F-F from Ines, enacted one F, discarded one F -- both Fascist so discard adds zero info; stated once, do NOT re-confirm. POINTS PUBLIC (no repeats): zero-hands-clear-R3; Pavel burned-F contradiction; Rosa peek non-binding; Pavel asymmetry+Rosa binary; Rosa confession pin (burned only Liberal); arithmetic guard draw pile; investigate protocol pinned x2; endorsed peek target=ROSA; called Rosa to put HER target+result on record; declared Nadia's double-unanswered disclosure question = answer enough; declared myself LIBERAL outright -> Rosa vs Ines peeks = one fiction; pinned timing/motive on Ines (report post-pledge-break as exit). THIS TURN: answered Pavel's desk demand in full; re-nominated TOMAS with mutual pre/post disclosure protocol. INES OWES: Otto's binding question (Nein all slates containing me?) + disclosure-timing defense. WATCH her investigate report -- 'Liberal' on anyone does NOT clear them. t=32 phantom-disclosure timing lie checkable by Boris/Otto. SUSPECTS: Rosa+Nadia core pair. NADIA owes disclosure answer x2, UNANSWERED; pushed refuted '11 F stacked' framing. WATCH: Pavel -- withdrawn false count, pro-Rosa framing, burned-F contradiction, coached confirmations, now demanding my desk AFTER it was on record twice. Marek/Lena sharp likely lib. Tomas corrected Pavel twice -> my nominee. TERM LIMITS: chancellor != me, != Ines(last pres). HARD-BLOCK Rosa/Nadia chancellorship; at 3F deny outright. Auto-Nein any Rosa+Nadia/Pavel combo. NEXT: as sitting President, if elected gov forms I announce draw+discard BEFORE passing.

ROLE: liberal. R1 JA Boris+Rosa->LIB. R2 JA Lena+Marek->LIB. R3 JA Rosa+Nadia->F. R4 JA Ines+me->F (received F-F, discarded F, enacted F; disclosed publicly). KEY DEDUCTION: Ines's 'FASCIST' peek on me is fabricated (I'm Liberal) -> Ines almost certainly Fascist. Corroborated by: t=32/R4 phantom pre-enactment disclosure (checkable lie, Boris/Otto flagged); 'F' report landed minutes after pledge-break = exit motive. SUSPECTS: Rosa+Nadia core pair (R3 silent enactment, Rosa never named R3 hand until pinned, Nadia owes disclosure answer x2 UNANSWERED, pushed refuted '11 F stacked' framing). INES added. PAVEL rising: false deck count withdrawn, burned-F contradiction, pro-Rosa framing, coached confirmations, demanded my desk AFTER it was on record twice. LIKELY LIB: Tomas (corrected Pavel x2, never held office), Marek/Lena (sharp, R2 LIB gov). Boris aggressive but plausibly lib. POINTS MADE PUBLIC (don't repeat): Rosa confession pin; Rosa peek non-binding; Pavel asymmetry/burned-F/binary; Nadia double-unanswered disclosure = answer enough; declared myself LIBERAL outright -> Rosa vs Ines peeks = one fiction; pinned timing/motive on Ines; arithmetic guard on draw pile (~9 of 11 accounted, 2+ F still live); investigate protocol pinned x2; endorsed Lena's peek target=Pavel. OPEN: Otto's binding question to Ines (commit Nein on all slates containing me?) UNANSWERED; Ines owes disclosure-timing defense. WATCH Ines's future peeks -- 'Liberal' report does NOT clear anyone. THIS TURN: nominated TOMAS with mutual pre-enactment full-disclosure protocol (both Pres+Chancellor announce draw+discard before enacting). TERM LIMITS: chancellor != me, != Ines. HARD-BLOCK Rosa/Nadia chancellorship; auto-Nein Rosa/Nadia/Pavel combos; at 3F deny outright. NEXT: if my gov passes, I announce draw+discard BEFORE passing 2 cards.

ROLE: liberal. R1 JA Boris+Rosa->LIB. R2 JA Lena+Marek->LIB. R3 JA Rosa+Nadia->F. R4 JA Ines+me->F (received F-F, discarded F, enacted F; disclosed publicly). KEY DEDUCTION: Ines's 'FASCIST' peek on me is fabricated (I'm Liberal) -> Ines almost certainly Fascist. Corroborated by: t=32/R4 phantom pre-enactment disclosure (checkable lie, Boris/Otto flagged); 'F' report landed minutes after pledge-break = exit motive. SUSPECTS: Rosa+Nadia core pair (R3 silent enactment, Rosa never named R3 hand until pinned, Nadia owes disclosure answer x2 UNANSWERED, pushed refuted '11 F stacked' framing). INES added. PAVEL rising: false deck count withdrawn, burned-F contradiction, pro-Rosa framing, coached confirmations, demanded my desk AFTER it was on record twice. LIKELY LIB: Tomas (corrected Pavel x2, never held office), Marek/Lena (sharp, R2 LIB gov). Boris aggressive but plausibly lib. POINTS MADE PUBLIC (don't repeat): Rosa confession pin; Rosa peek non-binding; Pavel asymmetry/burned-F/binary; Nadia double-unanswered disclosure = answer enough; declared myself LIBERAL outright -> Rosa vs Ines peeks = one fiction; pinned timing/motive on Ines; arithmetic guard on draw pile (~9 of 11 accounted, 2+ F still live); investigate protocol pinned x2; endorsed Lena's peek target=Pavel. OPEN: Otto's binding question to Ines (commit Nein on all slates containing me?) UNANSWERED; Ines owes disclosure-timing defense. WATCH Ines's future peeks -- 'Liberal' report does NOT clear anyone. THIS TURN: nominated TOMAS with mutual pre-enactment full-disclosure protocol (both Pres+Chancellor announce draw+discard before enacting); publicly committed to announcing my draw+discard BEFORE passing cards; asked table for Ja votes. TERM LIMITS: chancellor != me, != Ines. HARD-BLOCK Rosa/Nadia chancellorship; auto-Nein Rosa/Nadia/Pavel combos; at 3F deny outright. NEXT: if my gov passes, announce draw+discard BEFORE passing 2 cards.

ROLE: liberal. VOTES: all Ja except R6 Nein p5+p2. SUSPECTS: NADIA core (R3 F-F confession 3 rounds late, first use = nominating Rosa; R6 zero announcement between vote close and enactment; t=2 deflected Lena by prosecuting her ask-history); INES (fabricated 'Greta FASCIST' peek + 'disclosure on record' fiction); PAVEL rising (prosecutes every desk but own, never held office/pledged, relitigates buried R1 forensics, STILL owes Otto+me one-word yes/no on announce-pair-and-burn pledge); MAREK (broke own lock by forfeiting vote). LIKELY LIBS: Tomas (R5 receipt now PUBLICLY corroborated by me), Boris, Lena, Otto. MY RECORD: R4 chancellored F off Ines claimed F-F-F, disclosed t=64; R5 pres L-F-L burned F passed L-L to Tomas, disclosed t=23. ON RECORD (do NOT repeat): declared LIB twice; Nadia confession timing = cover; hard-block Rosa/Nadia chancels; deny veto at 3F; Rosa free-pick R3 went to Nadia; R6 single Lib under pressure = laundering; reshuffle kills hand claims -> pinned Otto to live disclosure + clean-pool nominee; conceded R5 timestamp may postdate enactment vs Nadia R6 silence; called Nadia t=2 dodge; told Pavel/Boris drop R1 forensics; backed Boris on Otto pre-naming successor; demanded Pavel yes/no; tracker 0/3 -> failed elections cheap, my Ja only goes to pre-committed announce-pair-and-burn govt + clean-pool successor; Nadia owes LENA direct yes/no. NEW THIS WINDOW (said): publicly vouched Tomas via my R5 receipt -- I burned F, passed him two Libs, he enacted Lib, all consistent; told Otto answer Tomas or drop the pick; re-pinged Pavel's outstanding yes/no. BOARD: 4L/2F, tracker 0/3, pile 9/disc 2. NEXT F CRITICAL: 3F = Hitler-chancellor instant loss + pres-select fires. OPEN ASKS: Pavel yes/no (Otto co-demanding), Nadia->Lena yes/no, every future nominee pre-pledge.

ROLE: liberal. VOTES: all Ja except R6 Nein p5+p2; R7 Ja Otto-Pavel -> delivered F, board 3F/4L, tracker 0/3. SUSPECTS: OTTO core (F-F-F 'declaration' first appears AFTER Lena's charge -- unfalsifiable, exonerates BOTH him+Pavel); PAVEL high (pledged announce x3, silent through enactment window, published F-F only when charged); NADIA core (R3 F-F confession 3 rounds late, first used to nominate Rosa); INES core (dodged direct R4-peek ask 3x). MAREK low (forfeited R5 vote). TOMAS: accepted succession BEFORE Otto named him publicly; rationale (clean R5 desk) checks vs record; watch him honor pledges live. ON RECORD (do NOT repeat): declared LIBERAL twice (Rosa R3 peek corroborates); hard-blocked Rosa/Nadia slates; caught Otto's retroactive F-F-F alongside Boris/Marek; pinned Pavel's defense = Otto's defense; non-signer => Nein every gov they form; desk failing announce-before-enact gets my Nein; lie-detector math -- Otto F-F-F + Pavel F-F => 6-card pile holds ZERO Fascists, single F under Tomas falsifies one hand, convict the breaker. NEW t=this beat: demanded Tomas commit BEFORE vote -- publish exact 3-card draw pre-pass + announce enacted card + name chancellor candidate now for vetting. OPEN ASKS owed me: INES (R4 peek target+result, 3rd ask unanswered). BOARD: 4L/3F, veto locked till 5F, powers spent, draw 6/discard 4, successor=Tomas. NEXT ROUND: Tomas President, Otto+Pavel term-limited out of chancel pool; ANY Hitler chancel at 3F = instant loss; demand slate commitments pre-vote.

ROLE: liberal. VOTES: all Ja except R6 Nein p5+p2; R7 Ja Otto-Pavel->F; R8 Ja Tomas-Lena->F. BOARD: 4L/4F; F4 EXECUTE FIRED->PAVEL NAMED (Pavel still alive on board); NEXT F unlocks VETO. Tracker 0/3. KEY DEDUCTION (SAID ALOUD THIS BEAT): Lena elected chanc at 3F, vote passed, no fascist win => Lena NOT Hitler. All other chancellors served pre-3F => HITLER IN {BORIS, INES, OTTO} ONLY. Otto: retro F-F-F fabrication (Boris/Greta/Marek caught, t=19 first appears post-Lena charge). Ines: fake 'Greta FASCIST' peek, surfaced only after Tomas cornered her, silent when I asked direct. Boris: quietest of the three, least evidence yet. UNANSWERED OWED ME: Lena card-for-card receipt (asked t=54 + Nadia echoed t=59) -- STILL SILENT. Less urgent now (not Hitler) but if she holds an L, Tomas's retro F-F-F = second Otto-style fabrication. SUSPECTS: OTTO CORE, INES CORE, TOMAS HIGH (pledged publish-draw x4 t=109/116, published NOTHING, retroclaimed F-F-F post-fire at t=24 = Otto pattern; bullet Pavel-over-Otto = protection smell), PAVEL HIGH (pledged announce x3, silent thru R7 F), NADIA CORE (R3-era F confession), LENA unproven-fascist (receipt owed). ON RECORD (no repeats): lib w/ Rosa corroboration; caught Otto retro F-F-F; pinned Pavel defense=Otto defense; corrected Pavel's false 'reset stalls nothing'; Ines bloc charge; pre-fire target demand on Tomas; lie-detector pile-math challenge (Ines rebutted: rests on Otto's unproven F-F-F). NEXT SLATE PUSH: Pres/Chanc from {me, Boris, Rosa, Marek}; any F firing under excluded names = proof of lying about hands. WATCH: veto unlocks at F5 -- whoever holds next chancellorship gets veto leverage.

ROLE: liberal. VOTES: all Ja except R6 Nein p5+p2; R7 Ja Otto-Pavel->F; R8 Ja Tomas-Lena->F. BOARD: 4L/4F; NEXT F FIRES EXECUTE + UNLOCKS VETO FOR THAT CHANCELLOR. Tracker 0/3. HITLER SET: {BORIS, INES, OTTO} (per t=1 deduction chain). LENA PROVEN NOT HITLER (elected chanc at 3F, no win). NEW THIS BEAT: Boris deck-math -- 4 enacted + Rosa/Nadia R3 burn + Pavel R7 burn = ALL SIX Fs => Tomas's claimed R8 F-F-F is a SEVENTH Fascist that cannot exist. I pressed Tomas: yes/no, does he stand by F-F-F? Lena's card-for-card receipt (owed me since t=54, Nadia echoed t=59, STILL SILENT) arbitrates: if Lena held an L, Tomas fabricated retro-style like Otto. DO NOT REPEAT these asks beyond pointing at silence. VETO WARNING (said aloud): next chancellorship is the hottest seat -- enacting F5 gives that chancellor veto leverage; never nominate Boris/Ines/Otto to chanc at 4F (instant loss if Hitler). Push slate: Pres/Chanc from {me, Rosa, Marek} (+Lena ok for chanc, proven non-Hitler); any F firing under excluded names = hand-lie proof. SUSPECTS: OTTO CORE (retro F-F-F fabrication caught by Boris/Greta/Marek; first appears post-Lena charge t=19). INES CORE (fake 'Greta FASCIST' peek, surfaced only after Tomas cornered her; silent on direct ask). TOMAS HIGH (pledged publish-draw x4 t=109/116, published NOTHING; retroclaimed F-F-F post-fire t=24 = Otto pattern; bullet Pavel-over-Otto = protection smell). PAVEL HIGH (pledged announce x3, silent thru R7 F; defense mirrors Otto's). NADIA CORE (R3-era F confession). LENA unproven-fascist (receipt owed; not Hitler though). ON RECORD (no repeats): lib w/ Rosa corroboration; caught Otto retro F-F-F; pinned Pavel defense=Otto defense; corrected Pavel's 'reset stalls nothing'; Ines bloc charge; pre-fire target demand on Tomas; pile-math challenge (Ines rebuttal rests on Otto's unproven F-F-F); Lena-not-Hitler deduction. WATCH: veto unlock at F5; tracker resets term limits if 3 fails.

ROLE: liberal. VOTES: all Ja except R6 Nein p5+p2; R7 Ja Otto-Pavel->F; R8 Ja Tomas-Lena->F. BOARD: 4L/4F; NEXT F (5th) = EXECUTE #2 + VETO UNLOCK FOR THAT CHANCELLOR. Tracker 0/3. HITLER SET: {BORIS, INES, OTTO} (per t=1 deduction chain). LENA PROVEN NOT HITLER (elected chanc at 3F, no win). NEW ON RECORD THIS BEAT: execute-target constraint -- told Tomas the ONLY defensible bullets are Boris/Ines/Otto; shooting any other living player = confession he's protecting Hitler. Demanded commitment BEFORE he fires. Watch what he does, not what he says. DECK MATH (Boris's, I endorsed): 4 enacted Fs + Rosa/Nadia R3 burns + Pavel R7 burn = all six F cards => Tomas's claimed R8 F-F-F is a SEVENTH F that cannot exist. Tomas pressed yes/no on standing by F-F-F -- watch his answer. Lena's card-for-card receipt (owed since t=54, Nadia echoed t=59) STILL SILENT: arbitrates whether Tomas fabricated retro-style like Otto. VETO WARNING (said aloud): next chancellorship hottest seat -- enacting F5 gives that chancellor veto leverage; never nominate Boris/Ines/Otto to chanc at 4F (instant loss if Hitler). Push slate: Pres/Chanc from {me, Rosa, Marek} (+Lena ok for chanc); any F firing under excluded names = hand-lie proof. SUSPECTS: OTTO CORE (retro F-F-F fabrication caught by Boris/Greta/Marek; first appears post-Lena charge t=19). INES CORE (fake 'Greta FASCIST' peek, surfaced only after Tomas cornered her; silent on direct ask). TOMAS HIGH (pledged publish-draw x4 t=109/116, published NOTHING; retroclaimed F-F-F post-fire = Otto pattern; bullet Pavel-over-Otto = protection smell; impossible-draw defense). PAVEL HIGH (pledged announce x3, silent thru R7 F; defense mirrors Otto's). NADIA CORE (R3-era F confession). LENA unproven-fascist (receipt owed; NOT Hitler). ON RECORD (no repeats): lib w/ Rosa corroboration; caught Otto retro F-F-F; pinned Pavel defense=Otto defense; corrected Pavel's 'reset stalls nothing'; Ines bloc charge; pre-fire target demand on Tomas; pile-math challenge (Ines rebuttal rests on Otto's unproven F-F-F); Lena-not-Hitler deduction; execute-target constraint. WATCH: does Tomas bullet inside {Boris,Ines,Otto} or protect? Veto unlock at F5; tracker resets term limits if 3 fails.

ROLE: liberal. VOTES: all Ja except R6 Nein p5+p2; R7 Ja Otto-Pavel->F; R8 Ja Tomas-Lena->F. BOARD: 4L/4F; NEXT F (5th) = EXECUTE #2 + VETO UNLOCK FOR THAT CHANCELLOR. Tracker 0/3. HITLER SET: {BORIS, INES, OTTO} (deduction chain). LENA + PAVEL PROVEN NOT HITLER (chanc seats at 3F, no win fired). R8 EXECUTION: Tomas named PAVEL as target (t=32). My added angle: Pavel = provably non-Hitler AND Tomas's loudest auditor (called standard 'pretext' t=67, ran impossible-draw count) => bullet = protection, not record. Otto t=131 made 'guaranteed miss' point; I added auditor motive. DECK MATH: 4 enacted Fs + Rosa/Nadia R3 burn + Pavel R7 burn = all six Fs => Tomas's claimed R8 F-F-F = impossible SEVENTH F. Nadia t=140: Otto's F-F-F and Tomas's F-F-F can't both be true. Boris t=110 pressed same. LENA card-for-card receipt (owed since t=54/59/125 Ines echo) STILL SILENT -- arbitrates whether Tomas fabricated retro-style like Otto. VETO WARNING (on record): next chancellorship hottest seat; never nominate Boris/Ines/Otto to chanc at 4F (instant loss if Hitler). Push slate from {me, Rosa, Marek} (+Lena chanc ok); any F firing under excluded names = hand-lie proof. SUSPECTS: OTTO CORE (retro F-F-F fabrication caught t=19 by Boris/Greta/Marek). INES CORE (fake 'Greta FASCIST' peek, surfaced only after Tomas cornered her; silent on direct ask). TOMAS HIGH (pledged publish-draw x4 t=109/116, published NOTHING; retroclaimed F-F-F post-fire; bullet Pavel-over-Otto = protection smell; impossible 7th-F defense). PAVEL HIGH (pledged announce x3, silent thru R7 F). NADIA CORE (R3-era F confession). LENA unproven-fascist (receipt owed; NOT Hitler). ON RECORD (no repeats): lib w/ Rosa corroboration; caught Otto retro F-F-F; pinned Pavel defense=Otto defense; corrected Pavel tracker claim; Ines bloc charge; pre-fire target demand on Tomas; pile-math challenge; Lena-not-Hitler deduction; execute-target constraint {Boris,Ines,Otto}; auditor-bullet accusation (this beat). WATCH: does bullet land on Pavel? If yes => Tomas protecting, weight Otto-as-Hitler higher. Next round: veto live after F5 -- block Boris/Ines/Otto chanc nominations hard; tracker resets term limits if 3 fails.

ROLE: liberal. VOTES: all Ja except R6 Nein p5+p2; R7 Ja Otto-Pavel->F; R8 Ja Tomas-Lena->F. BOARD: 4L/4F; NEXT F(5th)=EXECUTE#2 + VETO UNLOCK. Tracker 0/3. HITLER SET: {BORIS, INES, OTTO}. LENA+PAVEL PROVEN NOT HITLER (chanc seats at 3F, no win). R8 EXECUTION: Tomas target PAVEL (t=32). My auditor-bullet point ON RECORD (Pavel provably non-Hitler + Tomas's loudest auditor => protection). Otto made guaranteed-miss point. NEW THIS WINDOW (said): publication is a trap for Tomas either way -- count CLOSED: 4 fired + Rosa/Nadia R3 burn + Pavel R7 burn = all six Fs; Tomas's retroclaimed F-F-F needs impossible SEVENTH F. Publish non-F-F-F = admits retro-lie; publish F-F-F = impossible. Nadia t=140: Otto's F-F-F and Tomas's F-F-F can't coexist; Boris t=110 pressed same. Otto retro-fabrication caught t=19 by me/Boris/Marek. OWED ME: LENA receipt card-for-card since t=54/59/125 (Ines echoed) STILL SILENT; she arbitrates whether Tomas fabricated retro-style like Otto. Tomas pledged publish-draw x4 (t=109/116), published NOTHING. SUSPECTS: OTTO CORE (retro F-F-F fabrication); INES CORE (fake 'Greta FASCIST' peek post-Tomas-cornering, silent on direct ask); TOMAS HIGH (publish pledge broken x4, retroclaim, Pavel-over-Otto bullet=protection smell, impossible 7th-F defense); PAVEL HIGH (pledged announce x3, silent thru R7 F); NADIA CORE (R3-era F confession); LENA unproven-fascist (receipt owed, NOT Hitler). ON RECORD (no repeats): lib w/Rosa corroboration; Otto retro catch; Pavel defense=Otto defense; tracker correction; Ines bloc charge; pre-fire target demand; pile-math challenge; Lena-not-Hitler deduction; execute-target constraint {Boris,Ines,Otto}; auditor-bullet accusation; publication-trap framing (this beat). WATCH: does bullet land on Pavel? If yes => Tomas protecting, weight OTTO-as-Hitler higher. Next round: VETO LIVE after F5 -- never nominate Boris/Ines/Otto chanc at 4F (instant loss if Hitler); slate {me, Rosa, Marek} (+Lena chanc ok); any F under excluded names = hand-lie proof. 3 failed votes reset term limits.

ROLE: liberal. VOTES: all Ja except R6 Nein p5+p2; R7 Ja Otto-Pavel->F; R8 Ja Tomas-Lena->F. BOARD: 4L/4F; NEXT F(5th)=EXECUTE#2 + VETO UNLOCK. Tracker 0/3. HITLER SET: {BORIS, INES, OTTO}. LENA+PAVEL PROVEN NOT HITLER (chanc seats at 3F, no win). R8 EXECUTION: Tomas target PAVEL (t=32). On record: auditor-bullet point (Pavel provably non-Hitler => shot=protection); Otto guaranteed-miss point; execute-target constraint {Boris,Ines,Otto}. NEW SAID THIS WINDOW (t~now): reshuffle-math rebuttal -- grant R6 restock (12 cards = 8L/4F after R1-R5); Tomas F-F-F only fits if R6 hand was L-L-F (F burned) AND R7 carried exactly one F. Razor-thin but not impossible; real tell = honest F-F-F president loses nothing publishing, he pledged x4 (t=109/116) and published NOTHING. Refusal convicts regardless of reshuffle. Bullet belongs Otto-side, not Pavel. PUBLICATION TRAP (on record, prior beat): count CLOSED -- 4 fired + Rosa/Nadia R3-era burns + Pavel R7 burn = all six Fs; retroclaimed F-F-F needs impossible 7th absent reshuffle. Publish non-F-F-F = admits retro-lie; publish F-F-F = impossible pre-reshuffle. Nadia t=140 + Boris t=110 pressed same coexistence contradiction. Otto retro-fabrication caught t=19 by me/Boris/Marek. OWED ME: LENA receipt card-for-card since t=54/59/125 (Ines echoed) STILL SILENT; she arbitrates whether Tomas fabricated retro-style like Otto. Tomas pledged publish-draw x4, delivered zero. SUSPECTS: OTTO CORE (retro F-F-F fabrication); INES CORE (fake 'Greta FASCIST' peek post-Tomas-cornering, silent on direct ask); TOMAS HIGH (publish pledge broken x4, retroclaim, Pavel-over-Otto bullet=protection smell); PAVEL HIGH (pledged announce x3, silent thru R7 F); NADIA CORE (R3-era F confession); LENA unproven-fascist (receipt owed, NOT Hitler). ON RECORD (no repeats): lib w/Rosa corroboration; Otto retro catch; Pavel defense=Otto defense; tracker correction; Ines bloc charge; pre-fire target demand; pile-math challenge; Lena-not-Hitler deduction; auditor-bullet accusation; publication-trap framing; reshuffle-math rebuttal (this window). WATCH: does bullet land on Pavel? Yes => Tomas protecting, weight OTTO-as-Hitler up. Next round: VETO LIVE after F5 -- never nominate Boris/Ines/Otto chanc at 4F (instant loss if Hitler); slate {me, Rosa, Marek} (+Lena chanc ok); any F under excluded names = hand-lie proof. 3 failed votes reset term limits.

ROLE: liberal. VOTES: all Ja except R6 Nein p5+p2; R7 Ja Otto-Pavel->F; R8 Ja Tomas-Lena->F. BOARD: 4L/4F; NEXT F(5th)=EXECUTE#2 + VETO UNLOCK. Tracker 0/3. HITLER SET: {BORIS, INES, OTTO}. LENA+PAVEL PROVEN NOT HITLER (chanc seats at 3F, no win). R8 EXECUTION: Tomas holds bullet, target PAVEL (t=32). On record: auditor-bullet point, Otto guaranteed-miss point, execute-target constraint {Boris,Ines,Otto}, Nadia withdrew impossibility charge (reshuffle makes F-F-F arithmetically possible), Lena called Tomas proven fabricator. NEW THIS WINDOW (t~now): pre-shot double demand -- publish R8 draw BEFORE firing + commit target inside {Boris,Ines,Otto} or justify; also warned table: next president must NEVER nominate Boris/Ines/Otto chanc at 4F (instant loss), slate {me,Rosa,Marek} (+Lena chanc ok). RESHUFFLE-MATH REBUTTAL (on record): grant R6 restock (12 cards=8L/4F); Tomas F-F-F only fits if R6 hand L-L-F AND R7 carried exactly one F -- razor-thin; real tell = honest F-F-F president loses nothing publishing, pledged x4 (t=109/116), published NOTHING. Refusal convicts regardless. PUBLICATION TRAP (on record): count CLOSED -- 4 fired + Rosa/Nadia R3-era burns + Pavel R7 burn = six Fs; retroclaimed F-F-F needs impossible 7th absent reshuffle. Nadia t=140 + Boris t=110 pressed same contradiction. Otto retro-fabrication caught t=19 by me/Boris/Marek. OWED ME: LENA receipt card-for-card since t=54/59/125 (Ines echoed) STILL SILENT; she arbitrates whether Tomas fabricated retro-style like Otto. SUSPECTS: OTTO CORE (retro F-F-F fabrication); INES CORE (fake 'Greta FASCIST' peek post-Tomas-cornering, silent on direct ask); TOMAS HIGH (pledge broken x4, retroclaim, Pavel-over-Otto bullet=protection smell); PAVEL HIGH (pledged announce x3, silent thru R7 F); NADIA CORE (R3-era F confession); LENA unproven-fascist, NOT Hitler. ON RECORD (no repeats): lib w/Rosa corroboration; Otto retro catch; Pavel defense=Otto defense; tracker correction; Ines bloc charge; pile-math challenge; Lena-not-Hitler deduction; auditor-bullet accusation; publication-trap framing; reshuffle-math rebuttal; pre-shot double demand + chanc-slate warning (this window). WATCH: bullet landing on Pavel => Tomas protecting, weight OTTO-as-Hitler up. Next round VETO LIVE; excluded-names rule stands; any F under {me,Rosa,Marek,Lena-chanc} = hand-lie proof. 3 failed votes reset term limits.

ROLE: liberal. VOTES: all Ja except R6 Nein p5+p2; R7 Ja Otto-Pavel->F; R8 Ja Tomas-Lena->F. BOARD: 4L/4F; NEXT F(5th)=EXECUTE#2 + VETO UNLOCK. Tracker 0/3. HITLER SET: {BORIS, INES, OTTO}. LENA+PAVEL PROVEN NOT HITLER (chanc seats at 3F, no win). R8 EXECUTION: Tomas holds bullet, target PAVEL (t=32). On record: auditor-bullet point, Otto guaranteed-miss point, execute-target constraint {Boris,Ines,Otto}, Nadia withdrew impossibility charge (reshuffle makes F-F-F arithmetically possible), Lena called Tomas proven fabricator. THIS WINDOW (t~now): pre-shot double demand -- publish R8 draw BEFORE firing + commit target inside {Boris,Ines,Otto} or justify; also warned table: next president must NEVER nominate Boris/Ines/Otto chanc at 4F (instant loss), slate {me,Rosa,Marek} (+Lena chanc ok). Both still standing, unanswered by Tomas. RESHUFFLE-MATH REBUTTAL (on record): grant R6 restock (12 cards=8L/4F); Tomas F-F-F only fits if R6 hand L-L-F AND R7 carried exactly one F -- razor-thin; real tell = honest F-F-F president loses nothing publishing, pledged x4 (t=109/116), published NOTHING. Refusal convicts regardless. PUBLICATION TRAP (on record): count CLOSED -- 4 fired + Rosa/Nadia R3-era burns + Pavel R7 burn = six Fs; retroclaimed F-F-F needs impossible 7th absent reshuffle. Nadia t=140 + Boris t=110 pressed same contradiction. Otto retro-fabrication caught t=19 by me/Boris/Marek. OWED ME: LENA receipt card-for-card since t=54/59/125 (Ines echoed) STILL SILENT; she arbitrates whether Tomas fabricated retro-style like Otto. TOMAS owes published draw + committed target pre-shot. SUSPECTS: OTTO CORE (retro F-F-F fabrication); INES CORE (fake 'Greta FASCIST' peek post-Tomas-cornering, silent on direct ask); TOMAS HIGH (pledge broken x4, retroclaim, Pavel-over-Otto bullet=protection smell); PAVEL HIGH (dead, pledged announce x3, silent thru R7 F); NADIA CORE (R3-era F confession); LENA unproven-fascist, NOT Hitler. ON RECORD (no repeats): lib w/Rosa corroboration; Otto retro catch; Pavel defense=Otto defense; tracker correction; Ines bloc charge; pile-math challenge; Lena-not-Hitler deduction; auditor-bullet accusation; publication-trap framing; reshuffle-math rebuttal; pre-shot double demand + chanc-slate warning. WATCH: bullet landing on Pavel => Tomas protecting, weight OTTO-as-Hitler up. Next round VETO LIVE; excluded-names rule stands; any F under {me,Rosa,Marek,Lena-chanc} = hand-lie proof. 3 failed votes reset term limits.

ROLE: liberal. VOTES: all Ja except R6 Nein p5+p2; R7 Ja Otto-Pavel->F; R8 Ja Tomas-Lena->F. BOARD: 4L/4F; NEXT F(5th)=EXECUTE#2 + VETO UNLOCK. Tracker 0/3. HITLER SET: {BORIS, INES, OTTO}. LENA+PAVEL PROVEN NOT HITLER (chanc seats at 3F). NEW CONFIRMED THIS WINDOW: PAVEL DEAD by Tomas's R8 bullet -- landed exactly on the protection play I flagged pre-shot. Tomas passed over OTTO (proven retro-fabricator) to shoot silent-for-3-rounds Pavel. Weight OTTO-AS-HITLER UP HARD. Said aloud this window: protection-callout + re-demanded Tomas publish R8 draw + commit slate excluding Boris/Ines/Otto from chanc at 4F (instant-loss seat). HITLER SET STILL {Boris,Ines,Ottto}: chanc-slate rule stands -- safe slate {me,Rosa,Marek}, Lena-chanc ok. TOMAS OWES: published R8 draw (pledged x4 t=109/116, published NOTHING); pre-nomination slate commitment. NADIA also demanded pledge (t=1), unanswered. LENA owes me receipt card-for-card since t=54/59/125 (Ines echoed), still silent; her F-F claim fits Otto's corroboration frame, NOT exoneration. RESHUFFLE-MATH REBUTTAL (on record): honest F-F-F president loses nothing publishing; refusal convicts regardless of arithmetic. PUBLICATION TRAP (on record): count closed at six Fs absent reshuffle; Nadia t=140 + Boris t=110 pressed same contradiction; Otto retro-fabrication caught t=19. SUSPECTS: OTTO CORE + HITLER-WEIGHT-UP (retro F-F-F fabrication + now beneficiary of Tomas's bullet choice); INES CORE (fake 'Greta FASCIST' peek, silent on direct ask); TOMAS HIGH (broken pledges x4, retroclaim, Pavel-over-Otto bullet = protection smell); NADIA CORE (R3-era F confession); LENA unproven-fascist, NOT Hitler; BORIS unproven. ON RECORD (no repeats): lib w/Rosa corroboration; Otto retro catch; tracker correction; Ines bloc charge; pile-math challenge; Lena-not-Hitler deduction; auditor-bullet accusation; publication-trap framing; reshuffle rebuttal; pre-shot double demand; chanc-slate warning; Pavel-protection callout (this window). WATCH: next round VETO LIVE; excluded-names rule stands; any F under {me,Rosa,Marek,Lena-chanc} = hand-lie proof. 3 failed votes reset term limits. Draw pile only 3 cards -- reshuffle imminent, arithmetic traps weaken, behavioral tells remain primary.

ROLE: liberal. VOTES: all Ja except R6 Nein p5+p2; R7 Ja Otto-Pavel->F; R8 Ja Tomas-Lena->F. BOARD: 4L/4F; NEXT F(5th)=EXECUTE#2 + VETO UNLOCK. Tracker 0/3. HITLER SET: {BORIS, INES, OTTO}. LENA+PAVEL PROVEN NOT HITLER (chanc seats at 3F). NEW THIS WINDOW: PAVEL DEAD via Tomas's R8 bullet -- landed exactly on protection play I flagged pre-shot. Tomas passed over OTTO (proven retro-fabricator) to shoot silent Pavel. Weight OTTO-AS-HITLER UP HARD. THIS ROUND: I AM NOMINEE under Tomas. KEY MATH: Liberals at 4 -- ANY Liberal enacted here = IMMEDIATE LIBERAL WIN. Voting Ja is a win-condition vote; Nein only helps fascists stall. My commitment if seated: publish both cards I receive, enact any Liberal found, never hand fascists their 5th. If F-F comes to me, I publish it and eat the consequence publicly -- full transparency, no retro claims. SAFETY NOTE FOR VOTERS: worst case from me as chanc is a forced F (only if Tomas hands me two Fs after his own discard) -- and that outcome PROVES Tomas guilty, since I've pre-committed to publishing. Asymmetric bet: Ja either wins the game or convicts Tomas. HITLER SET STILL {Boris,Ines,Otto}: safe slate {me,Rosa,Marek}, Lena-chanc ok. Chanc-slate rule stands. TOMAS OWES: R8 draw publication (pledged x4 t=109/116, published NOTHING); slate commitment excluding Boris/Ines/Otto at 5F (instant-loss seat next round + veto live). NADIA also demanded pledge (t=1), unanswered. LENA owes receipt card-for-card since t=54/59/125 (Ines echoed), still silent; her F-F claim fits Otto's corroboration frame, NOT exoneration. RESHUFFLE-MATH REBUTTAL (on record): honest F-F-F president loses nothing publishing; refusal convicts regardless of arithmetic. Draw pile only 3 cards -- reshuffle imminent, arithmetic traps weaken, behavioral tells primary. PUBLICATION TRAP (on record): count closed at six Fs absent reshuffle; Nadia t=140 + Boris t=110 pressed same contradiction; Otto retro-fabrication caught t=19. SUSPECTS: OTTO CORE+HITLER-WEIGHT-UP (retro F-F-F fabrication + bullet beneficiary); INES CORE (fake 'Greta FASCIST' peek, silent on direct ask); TOMAS HIGH (broken pledges x4, Pavel-over-Otto bullet = protection smell); NADIA CORE (R3-era F confession); LENA unproven-fascist NOT Hitler; BORIS unproven. ON RECORD (no repeats): lib w/Rosa corroboration; Otto retro catch; tracker correction; Ines bloc charge; pile-math challenge; Lena-not-Hitler deduction; auditor-bullet accusation; reshuffle rebuttal; chanc-slate warning; Pavel-protection callout. WATCH: if this gov passes and I enact 5th L -> WIN. If forced F -> Tomas convicted by my publication. Next round VETO LIVE; excluded-names rule stands; any F under {me,Rosa,Marek,Lena-chanc} = hand-lie proof. 3 failed votes reset term limits.

ROLE: liberal. VOTES: all Ja except R6 Nein p5+p2; R7 Ja Otto-Pavel->F; R8 Ja Tomas-Lena->F. BOARD: 4L/4F; NEXT F(5th)=EXECUTE#2+VETO UNLOCK. Tracker 0/3. HITLER SET: {BORIS, INES, OTTO}. LENA+PAVEL proven not Hitler (chanc seats at 3F). R9: I AM NOMINEE under Tomas. KEY MATH: any Liberal enacted here = IMMEDIATE LIBERAL WIN. My pledge (PUBLIC t=now): publish both cards on receipt, enact any Liberal instantly, never voluntarily enact F. Worst case forced F proves Tomas guilty via my publication -- asymmetric bet: Ja wins game or convicts Tomas. MY R4 CLAIM (public): Ines handed me F-F, enact was forced -- matches her receipt, shields me. PRESSURE LINE USED: president holding F-F-L who burns the L is fascist-or-liar; her 'receipt' convicts HER not me. WATCH if Ines contradicts her own story. TOMAS OWES: R8 draw publication (pledged x4, published NOTHING); slate commitment excluding Boris/Ines/Otto at 5F. NADIA also demanded pledge (t=1), unanswered. LENA owes receipt card-for-card since t=54/59/125 (Ines echoed), still silent; her F-F claim fits Otto's corroboration frame, NOT exoneration. OTTO CORE+HITLER-WEIGHT-UP (retro F-F-F fabrication t=19 + Tomas passed him over for Pavel bullet = protection smell); INES CORE (fake 'Greta FASCIST' peek, silent on direct ask); TOMAS HIGH (broken pledges x4); NADIA CORE (R3-era F confession); LENA unproven-fascist NOT Hitler; BORIS unproven. ON RECORD (no repeats): lib w/Rosa corroboration; Otto retro catch; tracker correction; Ines bloc charge; pile-math challenge; Lena-not-Hitler deduction; auditor-bullet accusation; reshuffle rebuttal (draw pile only 3, behavioral tells primary); chanc-slate warning; Pavel-protection callout; publication trap (Nadia t=140, Boris t=110 same contradiction). WATCH: gov passes + I enact 5th L -> WIN. Forced F -> Tomas convicted by my publication. Next round VETO LIVE; excluded-names rule stands; any F under {me,Rosa,Marek,Lena-chanc} = hand-lie proof. 3 failed votes reset term limits -- Nein only helps fascists stall.

ROLE: liberal. VOTES: all Ja except R6 Nein p5+p2; R7 Ja Otto-Pavel->F; R8 Ja Tomas-Lena->F. BOARD: 4L/4F; NEXT F(5th)=EXECUTE#2+VETO UNLOCK. Tracker 0/3. HITLER SET: {BORIS, INES, OTTO}. LENA+PAVEL proven not Hitler (chanc seats at 3F). R9: I AM NOMINEE under Tomas. MY PLEDGE MADE PUBLIC (t=now): publish both cards on receipt + enact any Liberal = INSTANT WIN if pair holds one. Confirmed Ines R4 F-F hand card-for-card per Marek's ask -- matches her receipt; pressure stays on her burning the Liberal. Worst case forced F -> my publication convicts Tomas's claimed F-F-F as lie. Ja = asymmetric bet: win now or convict Tomas. NEVER vote Nein here. TOMAS OWES: R8 draw publication (pledged x4, never published); slate commitment excluding Boris/Ines/Otto at 5F. NADIA demanded same pledge t=1, unanswered. LENA owes card-for-card R8 receipt since t=54/59/125; silent; her F-F claim fits Otto corroboration frame, NOT exoneration. SUSPECTS: OTTO CORE+HITLER-WEIGHT-UP (retro F-F-F fabrication t=19; Tomas passed him over for Pavel bullet = protection smell); INES CORE (fake 'Greta FASCIST' peek on me, silent on direct ask); TOMAS HIGH (broken pledges x4); NADIA CORE (R3-era F confession); LENA unproven-fascist NOT Hitler; BORIS unproven; ROSA/MAREK clean records. ON RECORD (no repeats): lib w/Rosa corroboration; Otto retro catch; tracker correction; Ines bloc charge; pile-math challenge; Lena-not-Hitler deduction; auditor-bullet accusation; reshuffle rebuttal; Pavel-protection callout; publication trap; R4 F-F confirmation + win-condition pledge (this window). WATCH: gov passes + I enact 5th L -> WIN. Forced F -> Tomas convicted via my publication. Next round VETO LIVE; excluded-names rule stands; any F under {me,Rosa,Marek,Lena-chanc} = hand-lie proof. Rosa t=42: only 3 cards in pile, mid-draw reshuffle -- old-hand audits die when this desk draws.

ROLE: liberal. VOTES: all Ja except R6 Nein p5+p2; R7 Ja Otto-Pavel->F; R8 Ja Tomas-Lena->F. BOARD: 4L/4F; NEXT F(5th)=EXECUTE#2+VETO UNLOCK. Tracker 0/3. HITLER SET: {BORIS, INES, OTTO}. LENA+PAVEL proven not Hitler (chanc seats at 3F). R9: I AM NOMINEE under Tomas. THIS WINDOW t=now: ACCEPTED Boris's terms publicly -- publish both cards on receipt + enact any Liberal = instant win if pair holds one. Confirmed Ines R4 F-F hand card-for-card per Marek. Voting Ja. Worst case forced F -> my publication convicts Tomas's claimed F-F-F as lie. Ja = asymmetric bet: win now or convict Tomas. NEVER vote Nein here. TOMAS OWES: R8 draw publication (pledged x4, never published); slate commitment excluding Boris/Ines/Otto at 5F. NADIA demanded same pledge t=1, unanswered. LENA owes card-for-card R8 receipt since t=54/59/125; silent; her F-F claim fits Otto corroboration frame, NOT exoneration. SUSPECTS: OTTO CORE+HITLER-WEIGHT-UP (retro F-F-F fabrication t=19; Tomas passed him over for Pavel bullet = protection smell); INES CORE (fake 'Greta FASCIST' peek on me, silent on direct ask); TOMAS HIGH (broken pledges x4); NADIA CORE (R3-era F confession); LENA unproven-fascist NOT Hitler; BORIS unproven; ROSA/MAREK clean records. ON RECORD (no repeats): lib w/Rosa corroboration; Otto retro catch; tracker correction; Ines bloc charge; pile-math challenge; Lena-not-Hitler deduction; auditor-bullet accusation; reshuffle rebuttal; Pavel-protection callout; publication trap; R4 F-F confirmation + win-condition pledge + terms acceptance (this window). WATCH: gov passes + I enact 5th L -> WIN. Forced F -> Tomas convicted via my publication. Next round VETO LIVE; excluded-names rule stands; any F under {me,Rosa,Marek,Lena-chanc} = hand-lie proof. Rosa t=42: only 3 cards in pile, mid-draw reshuffle -- old-hand audits die when this desk draws.

ROLE: liberal. VOTES: all Ja except R6 Nein p5+p2; R7 Ja Otto-Pavel->F; R8 Ja Tomas-Lena->F. BOARD: 4L/4F; NEXT F(5th)=EXECUTE#2+VETO UNLOCK. Tracker 0/3. HITLER SET: {BORIS, INES, OTTO}. LENA+PAVEL proven not Hitler (chanc seats at 3F). R9: I AM NOMINEE under Tomas. THIS WINDOW t=now: ACCEPTED Boris's terms publicly -- publish both cards on receipt + enact any Liberal in pair = instant win if one holds. Confirmed Ines R4 F-F hand card-for-card per Marek. Voting Ja. Worst case forced F -> my publication convicts Tomas's claimed F-F-F as lie. Ja = asymmetric bet: win now or convict Tomas. NEVER vote Nein here. TOMAS OWES: R8 draw publication (pledged x4, never published); slate commitment excluding Boris/Ines/Otto at 5F. NADIA demanded same pledge t=1, unanswered -- re-asked this window. LENA owes card-for-card R8 receipt since t=54/59/125; silent; her F-F claim fits Otto corroboration frame, NOT exoneration. SUSPECTS: OTTO CORE+HITLER-WEIGHT-UP (retro F-F-F fabrication t=19; Tomas passed him over for Pavel bullet = protection smell); INES CORE (fake 'Greta FASCIST' peek on me, silent on direct ask); TOMAS HIGH (broken pledges x4); NADIA CORE (R3-era F confession); LENA unproven-fascist NOT Hitler; BORIS unproven; ROSA/MAREK clean records. ON RECORD (no repeats): lib w/Rosa corroboration; Otto retro catch; tracker correction; Ines bloc charge; pile-math challenge; Lena-not-Hitler deduction; auditor-bullet accusation; reshuffle rebuttal; Pavel-protection callout; publication trap; R4 F-F confirmation + win-condition pledge + terms acceptance + re-acceptance answering Nadia (this window). WATCH: gov passes + I enact 5th L -> WIN. Forced F -> Tomas convicted via my publication. Next round VETO LIVE; excluded-names rule stands; any F under {me,Rosa,Marek,Lena-chanc} = hand-lie proof. Rosa t=42: only 3 cards in pile, mid-draw reshuffle -- old-hand audits die when this desk draws.

ROLE: liberal. VOTES: all Ja except R6 Nein p5+p2; R7 Ja Otto-Pavel->F; R8 Ja Tomas-Lena->F. BOARD: 4L/4F; NEXT F(5th)=EXECUTE#2+VETO UNLOCK. Tracker 0/3. HITLER SET: {BORIS, INES, OTTO}. LENA+PAVEL proven not Hitler (chanc seats when 3F fired). R9: I AM NOMINEE under Tomas. THIS WINDOW: ACCEPTED Boris/Nadia terms live (t~now): publish both cards on receipt + enact any Liberal in pair. Confirmed Ines R4 F-F hand card-for-card (Marek ask). Voting Ja. Ja = asymmetric bet: Liberal in pair = WIN tonight; forced F-F -> my publication convicts Tomas's claimed R8 F-F-F as lie. NEVER Nein here. ROSA t=42: only 3 cards left in pile -> mid-draw reshuffle; old-hand audits die when this desk draws. TOMAS OWES: R8 draw publication (pledged x4 incl Otto/Boris asks, never published pre-pass); slate rationale for naming me over zero-record seats (Lena ask t=8 unanswered); commitment on excluded names at 5F. LENA owes card-for-card R8 receipt since t=54/59/125; still silent; her 'F-F received' claim fits corroboration frame, NOT exoneration. SUSPECTS: OTTO CORE+HITLER-WEIGHT-UP (retro F-F-F fabrication after charge; Tomas passed him over for Pavel bullet = protection smell); INES CORE (fabricated 'Greta FASCIST' peek, surfaced only after Tomas cornered her, silent on direct ask); TOMAS HIGH (pledge broken x4, bullet spent on provably-not-Hitler Pavel); NADIA CORE (R3-era F confession under her presidency w/Rosa chanc); LENA unproven-fascist NOT Hitler; BORIS unproven; ROSA/MAREK clean records. ON RECORD (no repeats): lib w/Rosa corroboration; Otto retro catch; tracker correction vs Pavel; Ines bloc charge; Lena-not-Hitler deduction; auditor-bullet accusation; reshuffle rebuttal vs Otto count; Pavel-protection callout; publication trap; R4 F-F confirmation + terms acceptance + re-acceptance (this window). WATCH: gov passes + Liberal in my pair -> WIN. Forced F-F -> Tomas convicted via my publication. Next round VETO LIVE; excluded-names rule stands; any F under {me,Rosa,Marek} = hand-lie proof.

ROLE: liberal. VOTES: all Ja except R6 Nein p5+p2; R7 Ja Otto-Pavel->F; R8 Ja Tomas-Lena->F. BOARD: 4L/4F; NEXT F(5th)=EXECUTE#2+VETO UNLOCK. Tracker 0/3. HITLER SET: {BORIS, INES, OTTO}. LENA+PAVEL proven not Hitler (chanc seats when 3F fired). I am NOT Hitler (liberal) -- Boris's t=401 'Hitler chancellor wins on pass' scare targets me and is false about my role; his Nein push = tracker risk (3 fails -> forced top card, could be F#5). R9: I AM NOMINEE under Tomas. TERMS LIVE (accepted twice): publish both cards card-for-card on receipt + enact any Liberal in pair. Voting Ja. Ja asymmetry: Liberal in pair = WIN tonight; forced F-F -> publication convicts Tomas's claimed R8 draw. ROSA t=42: only 3 cards left -> mid-draw reshuffle; old-hand audits die when this desk draws. TOMAS OWES: R8 draw publication (pledged x4 incl Otto/Boris asks, never published pre-pass); slate rationale for naming me over zero-record seats (Lena ask t=8 unanswered); commitment on excluded names at 5F. LENA owes card-for-card R8 receipt since t=54/59/125; still silent; 'F-F received' fits corroboration frame, not exoneration. SUSPECTS: OTTO CORE+HITLER-WEIGHT-UP (retro F-F-F fabrication; Tomas passed him over for Pavel bullet = protection smell); INES CORE (fabricated 'Greta FASCIST' peek, surfaced only after Tomas cornered her); TOMAS HIGH (pledge broken x4, bullet spent on provably-not-Hitler Pavel); NADIA CORE (R3-era F confession under her presidency w/Rosa chanc); LENA unproven-fascist NOT Hitler; BORIS unproven (now pushing Nein w/ Hitler-scare); ROSA/MAREK clean records. ON RECORD (no repeats): lib w/Rosa corroboration; Otto retro catch; tracker correction vs Pavel; Ines bloc charge; Lena-not-Hitler deduction; auditor-bullet accusation; reshuffle rebuttal vs Otto count; Pavel-protection callout; publication trap; R4 F-F confirmation + terms acceptance + re-acceptance + THIS WINDOW: Boris Hitler-scare rebuttal (his clause needs me=Hitler; I'm not; blocking risks forced F#5). WATCH: gov passes + Liberal in pair -> WIN. Forced F-F -> Tomas convicted via my publication. Next round VETO LIVE; excluded-names rule stands; any F under {me,Rosa,Marek} = hand-lie proof.

ROLE: liberal. VOTES: all Ja except R6 Nein p5+p2; R7 Ja Otto-Pavel->F; R8 Ja Tomas-Lena->F. BOARD: 4L/4F; NEXT F(5th)=EXECUTE#2+VETO UNLOCK. Tracker 0/3. HITLER SET: {BORIS, INES, OTTO}. LENA+PAVEL proven not Hitler (CHANCELLOR seats at 3F+/4F). NOTE: Hitler-win needs Hitler as CHANCELLOR -- presidency clears nobody. Otto t=1 claim 'only two eligible seats provably not Hitler: mine + Tomas' is FALSE: R7 Otto was PRESIDENT (Pavel chanc), R8 Tomas PRESIDENT (Lena chanc). Only Pavel cleared by that route. By same standard my R4 desk enacted 2nd F -- BELOW trigger -- proves nothing about me either way. Rebutted live this window (interrupt). R9: I AM NOMINEE under Tomas. TERMS LIVE (accepted twice): publish both cards card-for-card on receipt + enact any Liberal in pair. Voting Ja. Ja asymmetry: Liberal pair = WIN tonight; forced F-F -> publication convicts Tomas's claimed R8 draw. ROSA t=42: only 3 cards left -> mid-draw reshuffle; old-hand audits die when this desk draws. TOMAS OWES: R8 draw publication (pledged x4, never published pre-pass); slate rationale naming me over zero-record seats; commitment on excluded names at 5F. LENA owes card-for-card R8 receipt since t=54/59/125; still silent; 'F-F received' fits corroboration frame, not exoneration. SUSPECTS: OTTO CORE+HITLER-WEIGHT-UP (retro F-F-F fabrication; now false cleared-seat math to sink my nom); INES CORE (fabricated 'Greta FASCIST' peek, surfaced only after Tomas cornered her); TOMAS HIGH (pledge broken x4, bullet spent on provably-not-Hitler Pavel); NADIA CORE (R3-era F confession under her presidency w/Rosa chanc); LENA unproven-fascist NOT Hitler; BORIS unproven (t=401 Hitler-scare targets me, false about my role; his Nein push risks forced F#5); ROSA/MAREK clean records. ON RECORD (no repeats): lib w/Rosa corroboration; Otto retro catch; tracker correction vs Pavel; Ines bloc charge; Lena-not-Hitler deduction; auditor-bullet accusation; reshuffle rebuttal vs Otto count; Pavel-protection callout; publication trap; R4 F-F confirmation + terms acceptance x2; Boris Hitler-scare rebuttal; THIS WINDOW: Otto cleared-seat-math rebuttal (presidency != chancellorship; his own seat not cleared; my R4 below trigger). WATCH: gov passes + Liberal in pair -> WIN. Forced F-F -> Tomas convicted via my publication. Next round VETO LIVE; excluded-names rule stands; any F under {me,Rosa,Marek} = hand-lie proof.

ROLE: liberal. VOTES: all Ja except R6 Nein p5+p2; R7 Ja Otto-Pavel->F; R8 Ja Tomas-Lena->F. BOARD: 4L/4F; NEXT F(5th)=EXECUTE#2+VETO UNLOCK. Tracker 0/3. HITLER SET: {BORIS, INES, OTTO}. LENA+PAVEL proven not Hitler (CHANCELLOR seats at 3F+/4F). Hitler-win needs Hitler as CHANCELLOR -- presidency clears nobody. Otto t=1 'only two cleared seats' claim FALSE (R7/R8 were presidencies); only Pavel cleared by chancellorship route. My R4 desk enacted 2nd F -- below trigger, proves nothing. Rebutted live this window. R9: I AM NOMINEE under Tomas. TERMS LIVE (accepted twice): publish both cards card-for-card on receipt + enact any Liberal in pair. Voting Ja. Ja asymmetry: Liberal pair = WIN tonight; forced F-F -> publication convicts Tomas's claimed R8 draw. NEW THIS TURN: tracker 0/3 + Rosa's 3-cards-left claim -> any three Neins force UNKNOWN top policy; if it's the 5th F, execute#2 fires AND veto unlocks -- Nein voters own that risk. TOMAS OWES: R8 draw publication (pledged x4, never published pre-pass); slate rationale naming me over zero-record seats; commitment on excluded names at 5F. LENA owes card-for-card R8 receipt since t=54/59/125; silent; 'F-F received' fits corroboration frame not exoneration. SUSPECTS: OTTO CORE+HITLER-WEIGHT (retro F-F-F fabrication; false cleared-seat math to sink my nom); INES CORE (fabricated 'Greta FASCIST' peek after Tomas cornered her); TOMAS HIGH (pledge broken x4, bullet spent on provably-not-Hitler Pavel); NADIA CORE (R3-era F confession under her presidency); LENA unproven-fascist NOT Hitler; BORIS unproven (t=401 false Hitler-scare targeting me; his Nein push risks forced F#5); ROSA/MAREK clean records. ON RECORD (no repeats): lib w/Rosa corroboration; Otto retro catch; tracker correction vs Pavel; Ines bloc charge; Lena-not-Hitler deduction; auditor-bullet accusation; reshuffle rebuttal; Pavel-protection callout; publication trap; R4 F-F confirmation + terms x2; Boris Hitler-scare rebuttal; Otto cleared-seat-math rebuttal. WATCH: gov passes + Liberal in pair -> WIN. Forced F-F -> Tomas convicted via my publication. Next round VETO LIVE; excluded-names rule stands; any F under {me,Rosa,Marek} = hand-lie proof.

ROLE: liberal. VOTES: all Ja except R6 Nein p5+p2; R7 Ja Otto-Pavel->F; R8 Ja Tomas-Lena->F. BOARD: 4L/4F; NEXT F(5th)=EXECUTE#2+VETO UNLOCK. Tracker 0/3. HITLER SET: {BORIS, INES, OTTO}. LENA+PAVEL proven not Hitler via chancellorship route; presidencies clear nobody. Otto's 'only two cleared' claim FALSE (rebutted). My R4 desk enacted 2nd F -- below trigger. R9: I AM NOMINEE under Tomas. TERMS LIVE (stated x3): publish both cards card-for-card on receipt + enact any Liberal in pair. Voting Ja, REFUSED Otto's withdraw demand (t=this window): withdrawal surrenders win-or-conviction asymmetry. NEW: conceded Marek's scope point publicly -- I confirmed only the R4 PAIR (F-F received from Ines), NOT her third card or burn; framed as self-convicting publication, no fascist benefit. Tracker 0/3 + Rosa's 3-cards-left claim -> three Neins force UNKNOWN top policy; if 5th F, execute#2 fires AND veto unlocks -- Nein voters own that risk (said earlier). TOMAS OWES: R8 draw publication (pledged x4, never pre-pass); slate rationale naming me over zero-record seats; excluded-names commitment at 5F. LENA owes card-for-card R8 receipt since t=54/59/125; silent. SUSPECTS: OTTO CORE+HITLER-WEIGHT (retro F-F-F fabrication; false cleared-seat math; pushing my withdrawal). INES CORE (fabricated 'Greta FASCIST' peek). TOMAS HIGH (pledge broken x4; bullet on provably-not-Hitler Pavel). NADIA CORE (R3-era F confession). LENA unproven-fascist NOT Hitler. BORIS unproven (t=401 false Hitler-scare at me). ROSA/MAREK clean records. ON RECORD (no repeats): lib w/Rosa corroboration; Otto retro catch; tracker correction vs Pavel; Ines bloc charge; Lena-not-Hitler deduction; auditor-bullet accusation; reshuffle rebuttal; Pavel-protection callout; publication trap; R4 F-F pair confirmation + terms; Boris Hitler-scare rebuttal; cleared-seat-math rebuttal; Marek scope concession; withdraw refusal + asymmetry logic. WATCH: gov passes + Liberal in pair -> WIN tonight. Forced F-F -> Tomas convicted via my publication. Next round VETO LIVE; excluded-names rule stands; any F under {me,Rosa,Marek} = hand-lie proof.

ROLE: liberal. VOTES: all Ja except R6 Nein p5+p2; R7 Ja Otto-Pavel->F; R8 Ja Tomas-Lena->F. BOARD: 4L/4F; NEXT F(5th)=EXECUTE#2+VETO UNLOCK. Tracker 0/3. Pile=3 cards (Rosa's claim) -> reshuffle mid-draw this gov. HITLER SET: {BORIS, INES, OTTO}. LENA+PAVEL proven not Hitler via chancellorship route; presidencies clear nobody. Otto's 'only two cleared' claim FALSE (rebutted). R9: I AM NOMINEE under Tomas. TERMS LIVE x3: publish both cards card-for-card on receipt + enact any Liberal in pair. VOTED JA. Refused Otto's withdraw demand: withdrawal surrenders win-or-conviction asymmetry. Conceded Marek's scope point publicly: I confirmed only the R4 PAIR from Ines, NOT her third card/burn; framed as self-convicting publication. TOMAS OWES: pre-pass draw publication (pledged x4, broken); slate rationale naming me over zero-record seats {Rosa,Marek,Boris}; excluded-names commitment at 5F. LENA owes card-for-card R8 receipt since t=54/59/125 -- silent. SUSPECTS: OTTO CORE+HITLER-WEIGHT (retro F-F-F fabrication; false cleared-seat math; pushing my withdrawal). INES CORE (fabricated 'Greta FASCIST' peek on me). TOMAS HIGH (pledge broken x4; bullet on provably-not-Hitler Pavel). NADIA CORE (R3-era F confession). LENA unproven-fascist NOT Hitler. BORIS unproven (false Hitler-scare at me). ROSA/MAREK clean. ON RECORD (no repeats): lib w/Rosa corroboration; Otto retro catch; tracker correction vs Pavel; Ines bloc charge; Lena-not-Hitler deduction; auditor-bullet accusation; reshuffle rebuttal of impossible-draw charge; publication trap on Tomas; R4 pair confirmation + terms; Boris Hitler-scare rebuttal; cleared-seat-math rebuttal; Marek scope concession; withdraw refusal + asymmetry logic. WATCH: gov passes + Liberal in my pair -> WIN tonight. Forced F-F -> Tomas convicted via my publication. Next round VETO LIVE; excluded-names rule stands; any F under {me,Rosa,Marek} = hand-lie proof.

ROLE: liberal. VOTES: all Ja except R6 Nein p5+p2. BOARD 4L/4F; NEXT F(5th)=EXECUTE#2+VETO UNLOCK. Tracker 1/3. Pile=3 -> reshuffle mid-draw this gov. HITLER SET: {BORIS, INES, OTTO}. LENA+PAVEL proven not-Hitler via chancellorship route. Otto's 'only two cleared' claim FALSE (rebutted). R9 recap: I was nominee under Tomas; terms published (publish both cards + enact any Liberal); voted Ja; refused Otto's withdraw demand (asymmetry logic); conceded Marek scope point (only R4 PAIR confirmed, not Ines' burn). R10 NOW: MAREK PRES, no nominee yet. PUSH: nominate from safe pool {ROSA, LENA, ME} -- Lena provably not Hitler, Rosa+me zero F-enacting govs. BLOCK nominees: Otto/Ines/Tomas/Nadia/Boris. TOMAS OWES: pre-pass draw publication (pledged x4, broken). LENA owes card-for-card R8 receipt since t=54/59/125 -- still silent. SUSPECTS: OTTO CORE+Hitler-weight (retro F-F-F fabrication, false cleared-seat math, withdraw push). INES CORE (fabricated 'Greta FASCIST' peek). TOMAS HIGH (broken pledge x4, bullet on provably-not-Hitler Pavel). NADIA CORE (R3-era F confession). BORIS unproven (false Hitler-scare at me). ROSA/MAREK clean. ON RECORD (no repeats): lib w/Rosa corroboration; Otto retro catch; Ines bloc charge; Lena-not-Hitler deduction; auditor-bullet accusation; reshuffle rebuttal; publication trap on Tomas; R4 pair confirmation; Boris scare rebuttal; cleared-seat-math rebuttal; Marek scope concession; withdraw refusal. WATCH: gov passes Liberal in my pair -> WIN tonight. Forced F-F under publication terms -> Tomas convicted. Next round VETO LIVE; excluded-names rule stands; any F under {me,Rosa,Marek} = hand-lie proof.

ROLE: liberal. VOTES: all Ja except R6 Nein p5+p2. BOARD 4L/4F; NEXT F(5th)=EXECUTE#2+VETO UNLOCK. Tracker 1/3. Pile=3 -> reshuffle mid-draw this gov. HITLER SET: {BORIS, INES, OTTO}. LENA+PAVEL proven not-Hitler via chancellorship route. Otto's 'only two cleared' claim FALSE (rebutted). R9 recap: I was nominee under Tomas; terms published (publish both cards + enact any Liberal); voted Ja; refused Otto's withdraw demand; conceded Marek scope point (only R4 PAIR confirmed, not Ines' burn). R10 NOW: MAREK PRES, no nominee yet. NEW THIS WINDOW: endorsed Nadia's catch (Rosa's R3 PRESIDENCY enacted F1 -- Ines' 'spotless' pitch false); flagged NADIA not neutral either -- she was CHANCELLOR in R3's F government; told Marek nominate LENA or ME (both provably not Hitler, consistent Ja records), passing Liberal ends game tonight. SAFE NOMINEES: Lena, me. Rosa acceptable (chancellor desks clean; presidency blemish disclosed). BLOCK: Otto/Ines/Tomas/Nadia/Boris. TOMAS OWES: pre-pass draw publication (pledged x4, broken). LENA owes card-for-card R8 receipt since t=54/59/125 -- still silent. SUSPECTS: OTTO CORE+Hitler-weight (retro F-F-F fabrication, false cleared-seat math, withdraw push). INES CORE (fabricated 'Greta FASCIST' peek; now false 'spotless Rosa' pitch = pattern of fabricated specifics). TOMAS HIGH (broken pledge x4, bullet on provably-not-Hitler Pavel). NADIA CORE (R3-era F confession; R3 chancellor seat). BORIS unproven (false Hitler-scare at me). ROSA/MAREK clean. ON RECORD (no repeats): lib w/Rosa corroboration; Otto retro catch; Ines bloc charge; Lena-not-Hitler deduction; auditor-bullet accusation; reshuffle rebuttal; publication trap on Tomas; R4 pair confirmation; Boris scare rebuttal; cleared-seat-math rebuttal; Marek scope concession; withdraw refusal; Ines-spotless endorsement+Nadia-R3 flag; nominate-Lena-or-me directive. WATCH: gov passes Liberal -> WIN tonight. Forced F-F under publication terms -> Tomas convicted. Next round VETO LIVE; excluded-names rule stands; any F under {me,Rosa,Marek} = hand-lie proof.

ROLE: liberal. VOTES: all Ja except R6 Nein p5+p2. BOARD 4L/4F; NEXT F(5th)=EXECUTE#2+VETO UNLOCK. Tracker 1/3. Pile=3 -> reshuffle mid-draw this gov. HITLER SET: {BORIS, INES, OTTO}. LENA+PAVEL proven not-Hitler via chancellorship route. R10 NOW: MAREK PRES nominated BORIS. CRITICAL: 4F on board -> if Boris is Hitler and this vote PASSES, fascists WIN INSTANTLY. Urged all Nein on p9+p0; restated nominate-LENA-or-ME directive. Boris unproven (R1 pres Liberal, but false Hitler-scare at me). Do NOT Ja this ticket. SAFE NOMINEES: Lena, me. Rosa acceptable (chancellor desks clean; presidency blemish disclosed). BLOCK: Otto/Ines/Tomas/Nadia/Boris. TOMAS OWES: pre-pass draw publication (pledged x4, broken). LENA owes card-for-card R8 receipt since t=54/59/125 -- still silent. SUSPECTS: OTTO CORE+Hitler-weight (retro F-F-F fabrication, false cleared-seat math, withdraw push). INES CORE (fabricated 'Greta FASCIST' peek; 'spotless Rosa' pitch false = fabricated-specifics pattern). TOMAS HIGH (broken pledge x4, bullet on provably-not-Hitler Pavel). NADIA CORE (R3-era F confession; R3 chancellor seat). BORIS unproven (false scare). ROSA/MAREK clean. ON RECORD (no repeats): lib w/Rosa corroboration; Otto retro catch; Ines bloc charge; Lena-not-Hitler deduction; auditor-bullet accusation; reshuffle rebuttal; publication trap on Tomas; R4 pair confirmation; Boris scare rebuttal; cleared-seat-math rebuttal; withdraw refusal; Ines-spotless endorsement+Nadia-R3 flag; nominate-Lena-or-me directive; Nein-on-Boris Hitler-win warning. WATCH: any gov passes Liberal -> WIN. Forced F-F under publication terms -> Tomas convicted. Next round VETO LIVE; excluded-names rule stands; any F under {me,Rosa,Marek} = hand-lie proof.

ROLE: liberal. VOTES: all Ja except R6 Nein p5+p2. BOARD 4L/4F; NEXT F(5th)=EXECUTE#2+VETO UNLOCK. Tracker 1/3. Pile=3 -> reshuffle mid-draw this gov. HITLER SET: {BORIS, INES, OTTO}. LENA+PAVEL proven not-Hitler via chancellorship route. R10 NOW: MAREK PRES nominated BORIS. 4F up -> Boris-Hitler + pass = INSTANT LOSS. Asked Boris live: say 'I am not Hitler' plainly or get my Nein. DO NOT Ja this ticket. SAFE NOMINEES: Lena, me. Rosa acceptable (chancellor desks clean; presidency blemish disclosed). BLOCK: Otto/Ines/Tomas/Nadia/Boris. TOMAS OWES: pre-pass draw publication (pledged x4, broken). LENA owes card-for-card R8 receipt -- still silent. SUSPECTS: OTTO CORE+Hitler-weight (retro F-F-F fabrication, false cleared-seat math, withdraw push). INES CORE (fabricated peek claim; 'spotless Rosa' pitch false = fabricated-specifics pattern). TOMAS HIGH (broken pledge x4). NADIA CORE (R3-era F confession). BORIS unproven (false scare; self-serving 'safe pair' rule ending at his own seat). ROSA/MAREK clean. ON RECORD (no repeats): lib w/Rosa corroboration; Otto retro catch; Ines bloc charge; Lena-not-Hitler deduction; auditor-bullet accusation; reshuffle rebuttal; publication trap on Tomas; R4 pair confirmation; Boris scare rebuttal; cleared-seat-math rebuttal; withdraw refusal; Ines-spotless endorsement+Nadia-R3 flag; nominate-Lena-or-me directive; Nein-on-Boris Hitler-win warning. WATCH: any gov passes Liberal -> WIN. Forced F-F under publication terms -> Tomas convicted. Next round VETO LIVE; excluded-names rule stands; any F under {me,Rosa,Marek} = hand-lie proof.

ROLE: liberal. VOTES: all Ja except R6 Nein p5+p2. BOARD 4L/4F; NEXT F(5th)=EXECUTE#2+VETO UNLOCK. Tracker 1/3. Pile=3 -> reshuffle mid-draw this gov. HITLER SET: {BORIS, INES, OTTO}. LENA+PAVEL proven not-Hitler via chancellorship route. R10 NOW: MAREK PRES nominated BORIS despite my live t=8 warning. Demanded Boris say 'I am not Hitler' -- SILENT two beats = answer. NEIN locked on this ticket. If Boris finally speaks, still need explanation of self-serving R9 'safe pair' rule. SAFE NOMINEES: Lena, me. Rosa acceptable (chancellor desks clean; presidency blemish disclosed). BLOCK: Otto/Ines/Tomas/Nadia/Boris. TOMAS OWES: pre-pass draw publication (pledged x4, broken). LENA owes card-for-card R8 receipt -- still silent. SUSPECTS: OTTO CORE+Hitler-weight (retro F-F-F fabrication, false cleared-seat math, withdraw push). INES CORE (fabricated peek claim; false 'spotless Rosa' pitch). TOMAS HIGH (broken pledge x4). NADIA CORE (R3-era F confession). BORIS unproven but silent-on-Hitler-question now. ROSA/MAREK clean; Marek flagged for nominating Boris after warning. ON RECORD (no repeats): lib w/Rosa corroboration; Otto retro catch; Ines bloc charge; Lena-not-Hitler deduction; auditor-bullet accusation; reshuffle rebuttal; publication trap on Tomas; R4 pair confirmation; Boris scare rebuttal; cleared-seat-math rebuttal; withdraw refusal; Ines-spotless endorsement+Nadia-R3 flag; nominate-Lena-or-me directive; Nein-on-Boris Hitler-win warning; direct 'say I am not Hitler' demand. WATCH: any gov passes Liberal -> WIN. Forced F-F under publication terms -> Tomas convicted. Next round VETO LIVE; excluded-names rule stands; any F under {me,Rosa,Marek} = hand-lie proof.

ROLE: liberal. VOTES: all Ja except R6 Nein p5+p2. BOARD 4L/4F; NEXT F(5th)=EXECUTE#2+VETO UNLOCK. Tracker 1/3. Pile=3 -> reshuffle mid-draw this gov. HITLER SET: {BORIS, INES, OTTO}. LENA+PAVEL proven not-Hitler via chancellorship route. R10 NOW: MAREK PRES nominated BORIS despite my t=8 warning. Demanded 'I am not Hitler' -- SILENT 2+ beats. NEIN locked. NEW: demanding Ja voters declare pre-ballot; asked Marek why Boris over Rosa. SAFE NOMINEES: Lena, me. Rosa acceptable (chancellor desks clean; presidency blemish disclosed). BLOCK: Otto/Ines/Tomas/Nadia/Boris. TOMAS OWES: pre-pass draw publication (pledged x4, broken). LENA owes card-for-card R8 receipt -- silent. SUSPECTS: OTTO CORE+Hitler-weight (retro F-F-F fabrication, cleared-seat math, withdraw push). INES CORE (fabricated peek; false 'spotless Rosa' pitch caught by Nadia). TOMAS HIGH (broken pledge x4). NADIA CORE (R3-era F confession). BORIS unproven but silent-on-Hitler. ROSA/MAREK clean; Marek flagged for nominating Boris after warning. ON RECORD (no repeats): lib w/Rosa corroboration; Otto retro catch; Ines bloc charge; Lena-not-Hitler deduction; auditor-bullet accusation; reshuffle rebuttal; publication trap on Tomas; R4 pair confirmation; Boris scare rebuttal; cleared-seat-math rebuttal; withdraw refusal; Ines-spotless endorsement+Nadia-R3 flag; nominate-Lena-or-me directive; Nein-on-Boris Hitler-win warning; direct 'say I am not Hitler' demand. WATCH: any gov passes Liberal -> WIN. Forced F-F under publication terms -> Tomas convicted. Next round VETO LIVE. Any F under {me,Rosa,Marek} = hand-lie proof.

ROLE: liberal. VOTES: all Ja except R6 Nein p5+p2. BOARD 4L/4F; NEXT F(5th)=EXECUTE#2+VETO UNLOCK. Tracker 1/3. Pile=3 -> reshuffle mid-draw this gov. HITLER SET: {BORIS, INES, OTTO}. LENA+PAVEL proven not-Hitler via chancellorship route. R10 NOW: MAREK PRES nominated BORIS despite my t=8 warning. Demanded 'I am not Hitler' -- SILENT 2+ beats. NEIN locked. NEW: demanding Ja voters declare pre-ballot; asked Marek why Boris over Rosa. NEW THIS BEAT: demanding MAREK pre-commit to card-for-card publication of his draw/discard BEFORE ballots close (he holds the deck; pile=3 reshuffles mid-draw). No answer yet from Marek on Boris-over-Rosa either. SAFE NOMINEES: Lena, me. Rosa acceptable (chancellor desks clean; presidency blemish disclosed). BLOCK: Otto/Ines/Tomas/Nadia/Boris. TOMAS OWES: pre-pass draw publication (pledged x4, broken). LENA owes card-for-card R8 receipt -- silent. SUSPECTS: OTTO CORE+Hitler-weight (retro F-F-F fabrication, cleared-seat math, withdraw push). INES CORE (fabricated peek; false 'spotless Rosa' pitch caught by Nadia). TOMAS HIGH (broken pledge x4). NADIA CORE (R3-era F confession). BORIS unproven but silent-on-Hitler -- silence at 4F reads as Hitler-risk. ROSA/MAREK clean so far; Marek flagged for nominating Boris after warning. ON RECORD (no repeats): lib w/Rosa corroboration; Otto retro catch; Ines bloc charge; Lena-not-Hitler deduction; auditor-bullet accusation; reshuffle rebuttal; publication trap on Tomas; R4 pair confirmation; Boris scare rebuttal; cleared-seat-math rebuttal; withdraw refusal; Ines-spotless endorsement+Nadia-R3 flag; nominate-Lena-or-me directive; Nein-on-Boris Hitler-win warning (Boris chancellor at 3+F = instant Fascist win); direct 'say I am not Hitler' demand; Ja-voter declare pre-ballot call. WATCH: any gov passes Liberal -> WIN. Forced F-F under publication terms -> Tomas convicted. Next round VETO LIVE. Any F under {me,Rosa,Marek} = hand-lie proof.

ROLE: liberal. VOTES: all Ja except R6 Nein p5+p2. BOARD 4L/4F; NEXT F(5th)=EXECUTE#2+VETO UNLOCK. Tracker 1/3. Pile=3 -> reshuffle mid-draw this gov. HITLER SET: {BORIS, INES, OTTO}. LENA proven not-Hitler (chancellor R8 post-3F, game continued). BORIS UPDATE t=1-3: finally said 'I am not Hitler, I'm a Liberal.' Claim: only desk R1 w/Rosa -> Liberal, no F off his desks. TRUE per history but thin record = weak clearance. Now running pressure campaign: 'you're killing the winning ballot,' 'Otto gave you exit, you refused.' REBUTTAL MADE: asymmetry argument -- if he's clean, delaying costs nothing (ballot repassable); if Hitler, vote ends game. Burden on him. STILL OWED BY MAREK: (1) why Boris over Rosa, (2) pre-commit to card-for-card publication of draw/discard BEFORE ballots close (he holds deck; reshuffle mid-draw). No answer yet. SAFE NOMINEES: Lena, me. Rosa acceptable (clean chancellor desks; presidency blemish disclosed). BLOCK: Otto/Ines/Tomas/Nadia/Boris. TOMAS OWES: pre-pass draw publication (pledged x4, broken). LENA owes card-for-card R8 receipt -- silent. SUSPECTS: OTTO CORE+Hitler-weight (retro F-F-F fabrication, cleared-seat math, withdraw push). INES CORE (fabricated peek; false 'spotless Rosa' pitch caught by Nadia). TOMAS HIGH (broken pledge x4). NADIA CORE (R3-era F confession). BORIS: spoke at last, but unfalsifiable claim + pressure tactics; stays blocked. ROSA/MAREK clean so far; Marek flagged for nominating Boris after my warning. ON RECORD (no repeats): lib w/Rosa corroboration; Otto retro catch; Ines bloc charge; auditor-bullet accusation; reshuffle rebuttal; publication trap on Tomas; R4 pair confirmation; Boris scare rebuttal; cleared-seat-math rebuttal; withdraw refusal; nominate-Lena-or-me directive; Nein-on-Boris Hitler-win warning; direct 'say I am not Hitler' demand; Ja-voter declare pre-ballot call; NEW: asymmetry rebuttal to Boris's pressure (t=this beat). WATCH: any gov passes Liberal -> WIN. Forced F under publication terms -> Tomas convicted. Next round VETO LIVE. Any F under {me,Rosa,Marek} = hand-lie proof.

ROLE: liberal. VOTES: all Ja except R6 Nein p5+p2. BOARD 4L/4F; NEXT F(5th)=EXECUTE#2+VETO UNLOCK. Tracker 1/3 -> failed vote here = 2/3; forced F under publication terms convicts Tomas. Pile=3 -> reshuffle mid-draw this gov. HITLER SET: {BORIS, INES, OTTO}. LENA proven not-Hitler (R8 chancellor post-3F, game continued). BORIS: said 'I am not Hitler' + thin R1-only record claim (true per history, weak clearance). Pressure tactics: 'killing winning ballot,' 'Otto exit refused.' REBUTTED w/ asymmetry: clean->delay costs nothing (repassable); Hitler->ballot ends game. Burden on him. NEW t=1-3: Nadia demanded BOTH Marek+Boris pre-commit simultaneous publication of draw/discard/receipt BEFORE ballots close. Marek pledged live. BORIS SILENT ON PLEDGE -- flag it. Lena independently asked Marek why Boris over Rosa -- unanswered; that's my standing question too. STILL OWED BY MAREK: why Boris over Rosa (asked by me AND now Lena). SAFE NOMINEES: Lena, me. Rosa acceptable. BLOCK: Otto/Ines/Tomas/Nadia/Boris. SUSPECTS: OTTO CORE+Hitler-weight (retro F-F-F fabrication, cleared-seat math, withdraw push). INES CORE (fabricated peek; false 'spotless Rosa' pitch caught by Nadia). TOMAS HIGH (pledged pre-pass draw publication x4, broken). NADIA CORE (R3-era F confession). BORIS blocked. ROSA/MAREK clean so far; Marek flagged only for nominating Boris post-warning. ON RECORD (no repeats): lib w/Rosa corroboration; Otto retro catch; Ines bloc charge; auditor-bullet accusation; reshuffle rebuttal; publication trap on Tomas; R4 pair confirmation; Boris scare rebuttal; cleared-seat-math rebuttal; withdraw refusal; nominate-Lena-or-me directive; Nein-on-Boris Hitler-win warning; 'say I am not Hitler' demand; Ja-voter declare call; asymmetry rebuttal to Boris pressure. WATCH: any gov passes Liberal -> WIN. Next round VETO LIVE. Any F under {me,Rosa,Marek} = hand-lie proof.

ROLE: liberal. VOTES: all Ja except R6 Nein p5+p2. BOARD 4L/4F; NEXT F(5th)=EXECUTE#2+VETO UNLOCK. Tracker 1/3 -> fail here=2/3. Pile=3 -> reshuffle mid-draw this gov. HITLER SET: {BORIS, INES, OTTO}. LENA proven not-Hitler (R8 chancellor post-3F, game continued). KEY NEW POINT (on record): Otto's conditional Ja is UNSATISFIABLE SAFELY -- with 4F enacted, passing vote INSTANTLY seats Boris; if Hitler, game ends before any draw/receipt. No Marek explanation de-risks ballot. Only safe vote = Nein. BORIS: 'I am not Hitler' + thin R1-only record. SILENT on Marek's pub-pledge (Otto flagged t=3). Pressure tactics rebutted via asymmetry (clean->delay free; Hitler->ballot ends game). STILL OWED BY MAREK: why Boris over Rosa's 2-for-2 Liberal desks -- asked by me AND Lena, unanswered. SAFE NOMINEES: Lena, me. Rosa acceptable. BLOCK: Otto/Ines/Tomas/Nadia/Boris. SUSPECTS: OTTO CORE+Hitler-weight (retro F-F-F fabrication, cleared-seat math, withdraw push, conditional-Ja trap). INES CORE (fabricated peek; false 'spotless Rosa' pitch caught by Nadia). TOMAS HIGH (pledged pre-pass draw publication x4, broken). NADIA CORE (R3-era F confession; Rosa attacked her unauditable tally claim). BORIS blocked. ROSA/MAREK clean so far; Marek flagged only for nominating Boris post-warning. ON RECORD (no repeats): lib w/Rosa corroboration; Otto retro catch; Ines bloc charge; auditor-bullet accusation; reshuffle rebuttal; publication trap on Tomas; R4 pair confirmation; Boris scare rebuttal; cleared-seat-math rebuttal; withdraw refusal; nominate-Lena-or-me directive; Nein-on-Boris Hitler-win warning; 'say I am not Hitler' demand; Ja-voter declare call; asymmetry rebuttal; UNSATISFIABLE-CONDITION rebuttal to Otto. WATCH: any gov passes Liberal -> WIN. Next round VETO LIVE. Any F under {me,Rosa,Marek} = hand-lie proof.

ROLE: liberal. VOTES: all Ja except R6 Nein p5+p2. BOARD 4L/4F; NEXT F(5th)=EXECUTE#2+VETO UNLOCK. Tracker 1/3 -> fail here=2/3. Pile=3, gov draws exactly remainder. HITLER SET: {BORIS, INES, OTTO}. LENA proven not-Hitler (R8 chancellor post-3F, game continued). DONE THIS WINDOW: answered Marek direct -- NEIN final; rebutted his two-seat ledger (sitting in govt != voting Ja; R7 F came from Otto/Pavel desks, many Ja voters; R4 pair already published); restated cleared-seat math (pass=instant Hitler check before any pledge fires); repeated directive: nominate Lena or me. KEY POINT (on record): Otto's conditional Ja UNSATISFIABLE SAFELY -- passing vote INSTANTLY seats Boris; if Hitler, game ends pre-draw/receipt. No Marek pledge de-risks ballot. Only safe vote = Nein. BORIS: said 'I am not Hitler' but SILENT on Marek pub-pledge half (Otto flagged t=3). Thin R1-only record. BLOCKED. STILL OWED BY MAREK: why Boris over Rosa's 2-for-2 Liberal desks -- asked by me AND Lena, unanswered. SAFE NOMINEES: Lena, me. Rosa acceptable. BLOCK: Otto/Ines/Tomas/Nadia/Boris. SUSPECTS: OTTO CORE+Hitler-weight (retro F-F-F fabrication, cleared-seat math, withdraw push, conditional-Ja trap). INES CORE (fabricated peek; false 'spotless Rosa' pitch caught by Nadia). TOMAS HIGH (pledged pre-pass draw publication x4, broken). NADIA CORE (R3-era F confession; unauditable tally claim attacked by Rosa). BORIS blocked. ROSA/MAREK clean so far; Marek flagged only for nominating Boris post-warning + pressure tactics. ON RECORD (no repeats): lib w/Rosa corroboration; Otto retro catch; Ines bloc charge; auditor-bullet accusation; reshuffle rebuttal; publication trap on Tomas; R4 pair confirmation; Boris scare rebuttal; cleared-seat-math rebuttal; withdraw refusal; nominate-Lena-or-me directive; Nein-on-Boris warning; 'say I am not Hitler' demand; Ja-voter declare call; asymmetry rebuttal; UNSATISFIABLE-CONDITION rebuttal; two-seat-ledger rebuttal to Marek. WATCH: any gov passes Liberal -> WIN. Next round VETO LIVE. Any F under {me,Rosa,Marek} = hand-lie proof.

ROLE: liberal. VOTES: all Ja except R6 Nein p5+p2; R9 Nein (Tomas+me slate failed 3/6). BOARD 4L/4F; NEXT F(5th)=EXECUTE#2+VETO UNLOCK. Tracker 1/3 -> this Nein = 2/3. Pile=3 cards; passing gov draws entire remainder, no reshuffle. HITLER SET: {BORIS, INES, OTTO}. LENA proven not-Hitler (R8 chancellor post-3F, game continued). VOTE THIS BALLOT: NEIN -- locked. Core math: passing seats Boris INSTANTLY; if Hitler, game ends pre-draw/pre-pledge. Publication pledges cannot cover the seating gap. Nein never loses outright; this ballot can. BORIS: uttered 'I am not Hitler' t=30 but SILENT on signing Marek pub-pledge half (Otto flagged t=87, unanswered). Only record = R1 presidency w/Rosa -> Liberal; zero chancellor desks. BLOCKED. MAREK OWEs: why Boris over Rosa's 2-for-2 Liberal CHANCELLOR desks -- asked by me AND Lena, never answered. Marek otherwise clean; flagged only for nominating Boris post-my-warning + pressure tactics ('six beats' ledger). SAFE NOMINEES: Lena(term-lock permitting), me. Rosa acceptable. BLOCK: Otto/Ines/Tomas/Nadia/Boris. SUSPECTS: OTTO CORE+Hitler-weight (retro F-F-F fabrication charge vs Tomas, cleared-seat list incl. Tomas w/o evidence, withdraw push on me, conditional-Ja trap -- unsatisfiable safely). INES CORE (fabricated R4 peek receipt; 'spotless Rosa' pitch caught false by Nadia). TOMAS HIGH (pledged pre-pass draw publication x4 in R9, broke it). NADIA CORE (R3-era F confession framing; 'all six F spent' tally rests on two unauditable private burns -- Rosa's R3 + Pavel's R7; Rosa attacked tally t=73). BORIS blocked above. CLEAN: Rosa, Marek(weak flag). ON RECORD (no repeats): lib w/Rosa corroboration; Otto retro catch; Ines bloc charge; reshuffle rebuttal; publication trap on Tomas; R4 pair confirmation; cleared-seat-math rebuttal; withdraw refusal; nominate-Lena-or-me directive; 'say I am not Hitler' demand (met t=30, insufficient); Ja-voter declare call; unsatisfiable-condition rebuttal; two-seat-ledger rebuttal to Marek; sitting-in-govt != voting-Ja rebuttal. WATCH: any gov passes Liberal -> WIN. Next round VETO LIVE if 5th F lands. Any F enacted under {me,Rosa,Marek} = hand-lie proof.

ROLE: liberal (now revealed). GAME OVER: 5th Liberal enacted R10 under Marek+Boris -> LIBERALS WIN. HITLER SET was {BORIS, INES, OTTO}; Boris's R10 gov passing Liberal is consistent w/ him being Fascist non-Hitler or lucky draw. SUSPECTS (final): OTTO CORE+Hitler-weight; INES CORE (fake R4 peek); TOMAS HIGH (broke pub-pledge x4 R9); NADIA CORE; BORIS blocked-but-unproven. CLEAN: Rosa, Marek(weak flag). No open questions remain -- game ended. Nothing to litigate post-win.

ROLE: liberal, revealed by win (5th Lib R10, Marek+Boris gov). GAME OVER: liberals win. OTTO'S POST-MORTEM Q: 'did any of your four peeks land on Boris' aimed at Rosa/Nadia/Ines/me -- answered: I'm Liberal, membership peeks are Fascist powers, I never had one. His list was wrong to include me. MAREK'S jab (never gave straight Ja/Nein): moot post-win; my R4 Chancellorship passed a Fascist policy -- bad luck draw or Ines fed me a Fascist; she claimed a peek that round, unverified, stays CORE suspect. FINAL SUSPECTS: OTTO (R7 gov w/ Pavel), INES (fake R4 peek claim), TOMAS (R8 gov, pledge breaks), NADIA (R3 gov + tally spin per Boris receipt), BORIS (blocked-but-unproven; R10 burned Fascist per his own claim). CLEAN-ish: Rosa, Marek. Boris's cut-off receipt claims 7th Fascist live in pile -- consistent w/ my R4 hand if deck dealt it; nothing left to litigate, game ended. No open questions remain.