← secret_hitler-42-1787592921868
Player 3 (Ines)
fascist · fascist · oxalpha · 190 calls
bid round 14s
R1, nothing on board yet. I'm fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Greta Hitler. No evidence on anyone. Plan: stay quiet-ish early, claim liberal if asked, support a plausible first gov. Nothing said publicly yet.
speak round 16s
Round 1, no information. Boris nominated Rosa. Nothing to gain from speaking much; a light, liberal-sounding remark keeps me unremarkable.
R1: fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Greta Hitler. No evidence on anyone yet. Public: endorsed Rosa nomination (R1). Plan: claim liberal if asked, stay low-key, support plausible govs early.
bid round 15s
R1: fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Greta Hitler. No evidence on anyone yet. Public: endorsed Rosa nomination (R1). Plan: claim liberal if asked, stay low-key, support plausible govs early.
bid round 15s
R1: fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Greta Hitler. No evidence on anyone yet. Public: endorsed Rosa nomination (R1). Plan: claim liberal if asked, stay low-key, support plausible govs early.
bid round 14s
R1: fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Greta Hitler. No evidence on anyone yet. Public: endorsed Rosa nomination (R1). Plan: claim liberal if asked, stay low-key, support plausible govs early. Nothing new this window -- stayed silent.
bid round 15s
R1: fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Greta Hitler. No evidence on anyone yet. Public: endorsed Rosa nomination (R1). Plan: claim liberal if asked, stay low-key, support plausible govs early. Nothing new this window -- silent again.
vote round 16s
First round, no information. Rosa is not Hitler; a passing government gets cards moving and I stay unremarkable. Ja.
R1: fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Greta Hitler. No evidence on anyone. Public: endorsed Rosa nomination (R1). Plan: claim liberal if asked, stay low-key, support plausible govs early. Vote R1 gov (Boris/Rosa): ja.
bid round 18s
R1: fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Greta Hitler. R1 gov Boris/Rosa enacted Liberal. Public: endorsed Rosa nom, said liberal outcome fine. Plan: claim liberal, low-key, back plausible govs. No evidence on anyone yet.
speak round 159s
First round, Liberal enacted. Nothing to gain by speaking much; a short neutral remark keeps me looking engaged without drawing scrutiny.
R1: fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Greta Hitler. R1 gov Boris/Rosa -> Liberal (Boris claims 2F/1L draw, discarded F). Public so far: endorsed Rosa nom, called gov clean. Plan: claim liberal, low-key, back plausible govs, no evidence on anyone yet.
bid round 15s
R1: fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Greta Hitler. R1 gov Boris/Rosa -> Liberal (Boris claims 2F/1L draw, discarded F). Public: endorsed Rosa nom, called gov clean. Plan: claim liberal, low-key, back plausible govs, no evidence on anyone yet.
bid round 25s
R1: fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Greta Hitler. R1 gov Boris/Rosa -> Liberal (Boris claims 2F/1L draw, discarded F). Public: endorsed Rosa nom, called gov clean. Plan: claim liberal, low-key, back plausible govs incl Greta when safe, no evidence on anyone yet.
bid round 27s
R1: fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Greta Hitler. R1 gov Boris/Rosa -> Liberal (Boris claims 2F/1L draw, discarded F). Public: endorsed Rosa nom, called gov clean. R2: Lena pres. Rosa+Otto both pressing Lena to name pick early -- mild pressure, nothing new from me. Plan: stay low-key, back plausible govs incl Greta when safe, claim liberal.
bid round 28s
R1: fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Greta Hitler. R1 gov Boris/Rosa -> Liberal (Boris claims 2F/1L draw, discarded F). Public: endorsed Rosa nom, called gov clean. R2: Lena pres, nominated Greta -- good for me, will back it openly as liberal. Plan: stay low-key, support Greta gov, claim liberal, don't over-defend.
speak round 212s
Lena nominated Greta (Hitler) -- great for me. I should back it lightly as a liberal, nothing over the top. No new info to add; a short supportive remark is fine.
R1: fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Greta Hitler. R1 gov Boris/Rosa -> Liberal (Boris claims 2F/1L draw, discarded F). Public: endorsed Rosa nom, called gov clean. R2: Lena pres, nominated Greta. Public this round: backed Greta nom, said will vote Ja. Plan: stay low-key, support Greta gov, claim liberal, don't over-defend.
bid round 26s
R1: fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Greta Hitler. R1 gov Boris/Rosa -> Liberal (Boris claims 2F/1L draw, discarded F). R2: Lena pres, nominated Greta. Already said publicly: backed Greta nom, will vote Ja, called her clean. Plan: stay quiet now, support Greta gov, claim liberal, don't over-defend.
bid round 210s
R1: fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Greta Hitler. R1 gov Boris/Rosa -> Liberal (Boris claims 2F/1L draw, discarded F). R2: Lena pres, nominated Greta. Already said publicly: backed Greta nom, will vote Ja, called her clean. Plan: stay quiet now, support Greta gov, claim liberal, don't over-defend.
vote round 27s
Greta is Hitler and Lena is my fellow fascist -- this government is ideal for us. Vote Ja as committed publicly. If it passes, Greta will need to disclose a hand; she can handle that herself.
R1: fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Greta Hitler. R1 gov Boris/Rosa -> Liberal (Boris claims 2F/1L, discarded F). R2: Lena pres, Greta chancellor nom; I publicly backed her + said voting Ja. Plan: Ja now; if passes, let Greta handle disclosure herself, don't over-defend; claim liberal throughout.
bid round 28s
R1: fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Greta Hitler. R1 gov Boris/Rosa -> Liberal (Boris claims 2F/1L, discarded F). R2: Lena/Greta -> Fascist enacted. Plan: don't over-defend Greta; let her disclose herself. Deflect suspicion onto Boris/Rosa (R1 gov passed Liberal but Boris claimed 2F hand). Claim liberal throughout. Already said publicly: backed Greta's nomination pre-vote.
bid round 29s
R1: fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Greta Hitler. R1 gov Boris/Rosa -> Liberal (Boris claims 2F/1L, discarded F). R2: Lena/Greta -> Fascist enacted; Lena publicly claimed 2L/1F hand, discarded L, passed Greta L+F. Plan: stay quiet, let Greta answer for herself -- don't over-defend. Deflect suspicion onto Boris/Rosa later if needed. Claim liberal throughout. Already said: backed Greta's nomination pre-vote.
bid round 26s
R1: fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Greta Hitler. R1 gov Boris/Rosa -> Liberal (Boris claims 2F/1L, discarded F). R2: Lena/Greta -> Fascist enacted; Lena claims 2L/1F hand, discarded L, passed Greta L+F; Greta counters claiming all-Fascist hand. Plan: stay quiet, let Greta fight her own battle -- don't over-defend. Deflect onto Boris/Rosa later if needed. Claim liberal throughout. Already said: backed Greta's nomination pre-vote.
bid round 284s
R1: fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Greta Hitler. R1 gov Boris/Rosa -> Liberal (Boris claims 2F/1L). R2: Lena/Greta -> Fascist enacted; Lena claims 2L/1F hand discarded L passed L+F; Greta counters claiming all-F hand. Nadia pressing Greta on choice framing. Plan: stay quiet this window, let Lena/Greta fight their own battle -- don't over-defend either. Deflect onto Boris/Rosa later if needed. Claim liberal throughout. Already said: backed Greta's nomination pre-vote.
bid round 211s
R1: fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Greta Hitler. R1 gov Boris/Rosa -> Liberal (Boris claims 2F/1L). R2: Lena/Greta -> Fascist enacted. Lena claims 2L/1F discarded L passed L+F; Greta claims all-F hand, dodging Otto/Boris demands to name cards. Plan: stay quiet this window -- don't over-defend either; let them fight. Deflect onto Boris/Rosa later if needed. Claim liberal throughout. Already said: backed Greta's nomination pre-vote.
bid round 29s
R1: fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Greta Hitler. R1 gov Boris/Rosa -> Liberal (Boris claims 2F/1L). R2: Lena/Greta -> Fascist enacted. Lena claims 2L/1F discarded L passed L+F; Greta claims all-F hand, dodging Otto/Boris/Rosa demands to name cards. Plan: stay quiet this window -- don't over-defend either; let them fight. Deflect onto Boris/Rosa later if needed. Claim liberal throughout. Already said: backed Greta's nomination pre-vote.
bid round 27s
said: Greta, one more angle: you say you had no choice, but that story makes Lena a deliberate Fascist-passer -- so if you're innocent, you're accusing Lena outright. Are you willing to stand behind that accusation, or does your story wobble when it costs you an ally?
R1: fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Greta Hitler. R1 gov Boris/Rosa -> Liberal (Boris claims 2F/1L). R2: Lena/Greta -> Fascist enacted. Lena claims 2L/1F discarded L passed L+F; Greta claims all-F hand, dodging demands to name cards. Plan: stay silent this window, let Lena/Greta fight it out -- over-defending either looks bad. Deflect onto Boris/Rosa later if needed. Claim liberal throughout. Already said: backed Greta's nomination pre-vote.
bid round 27s
R1: fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Greta Hitler. R1 gov Boris/Rosa -> Liberal (Boris claims 2F/1L). R2: Lena/Greta -> Fascist enacted. Lena claims passed L+F discarded L; Greta claims all-F hand, refusing to name cards, blames Lena's discard. Boris+Nadia pressing Greta hard. Plan: stay silent this window -- over-defending either looks bad. Deflect onto Boris/Rosa later if needed. Claim liberal throughout. Already said: backed Greta's nomination pre-vote.
bid round 25s
R1: fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Greta Hitler. R1 gov Boris/Rosa -> Liberal (Boris claims 2F/1L). R2: Lena/Greta -> Fascist enacted. Lena claims passed L+F discarded L; Greta claims all-F hand, blames Lena's discard. Boris+Nadia+Rosa+Otto pressing Greta/Lena hard on discard story + 'private disclosure' claim. Plan: stay silent this window -- over-defending either looks bad. Deflect onto Boris/Rosa later if needed. Claim liberal throughout. Already said: backed Greta's nomination pre-vote.
bid round 25s
R1: fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Greta Hitler. R1 gov Boris/Rosa -> Liberal (Boris claims 2F/1L). R2: Lena/Greta -> Fascist enacted. Lena claims passed L+F discarded L; Greta claims all-F hand, blames Lena's discard. Boris+Nadia+Rosa+Otto pressing Greta/Lena hard on discard story + 'private disclosure' claim. Plan: stay silent this window -- over-defending either looks bad. Deflect onto Boris/Rosa later if needed. Claim liberal throughout. Already said: backed Greta's nomination pre-vote.
bid round 314s
R1: fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Greta Hitler. R1 gov Boris/Rosa -> Liberal (Boris claims 2F/1L). R2: Lena/Greta -> Fascist enacted; Lena claims L+F passed, discarded L; Greta claims all-F hand. Greta clarified 'told Lena earlier' = public statement, not private msg -- Rosa's fabrication charge now rests on misreading. Said this window: defended Greta on that point, noted Boris/Rosa gov enacted Liberal so their pressure is cheap. Plan: mild defense of Greta only, no reflexive cover of Lena; deflect onto Rosa/Boris if pressed; claim Liberal throughout. Don't repeat points.
speak round 316s
Greta's 'clarification' (t=21) is a retroactive patch: she now says 'told Lena earlier' meant a public statement, which contradicts her t=104 claim of a disclosure to Lena and matches Lena's denial. That's new confirmable evidence of an invented story. I've already said I'll Nein any government with Greta; no need to repeat. New angle: press Rosa to confirm whether she'll hold Greta out of governments too, or ask Otto directly what he'll commit to as Chancellor nominee before the vote.
R1: fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Greta Hitler. R1 gov Boris/Rosa -> Liberal. R2: Lena/Greta -> Fascist enacted; Lena claims 2L1F drew, discarded L; Greta claims all-F hand. Greta clarified 'told Lena earlier' = public statement, not private msg -- fabrication charge defused. Said this window: endorsed Otto as nominee, noted all accounts rest on one unverifiable card each (symmetric standard). Earlier said: defended Greta on clarification, Boris/Rosa pressure cheap since their gov enacted Liberal. Plan: claim Liberal, mild defense of Greta only, deflect onto Boris/Rosa if pressed. Don't repeat points.
bid round 38s
R1: fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Greta Hitler. R1 gov Boris/Rosa -> Liberal. R2: Lena/Greta -> Fascist; Lena claims 2L1F drew, discarded L; Greta claims all-F hand; Greta's 'told Lena' = public statement, fabrication charge defused. Said this window: endorsed Otto as nominee; symmetric unverifiable-card standard (Boris R1 draw vs Lena R2 discard). Earlier: defended Greta on clarification, Boris/Rosa pressure cheap since their gov enacted Liberal. Nadia pressing Rosa on future-Greta commitment -- Rosa's answer, not mine. Plan: claim Liberal, mild Greta defense only, deflect to Boris/Rosa if pressed. Don't repeat points.
bid round 37s
R1: fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Greta Hitler. R1 gov Boris/Rosa -> Liberal. R2: Lena/Greta -> Fascist; Lena claims 2L1F drew, discarded L; Greta claims all-F hand; Greta's 'told Lena' = public statement, fabrication charge defused. Said this window: endorsed Otto as nominee; symmetric unverifiable-card standard (Boris R1 draw vs Lena R2 discard). Earlier: defended Greta on clarification, Boris/Rosa pressure cheap since their gov enacted Liberal. Nadia pressing Rosa on future-Greta commitment -- Rosa's answer, not mine. Plan: claim Liberal, mild Greta defense only, deflect to Boris/Rosa if pressed. Don't repeat points.
bid round 310s
R1: fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Greta Hitler. R1 Boris/Rosa -> Liberal. R2 Lena/Greta -> Fascist (Lena claims 2L1F discarded L; Greta claims all-F hand). Said this window: endorsed Otto nominee; symmetric unverifiable-card standard. Now: endorse Otto's mutual-disclosure deal -- it's safe for us (Otto clean, Greta's R2 already public). Vote Ja on Rosa/Otto. Don't repeat earlier points.
speak round 314s
Otto proposed mutual disclosure; Rosa hasn't confirmed yet. I'll add my Ja conditional on Rosa confirming, and note Greta still owes her exact two cards.
R1: fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Greta Hitler. R1 Boris/Rosa -> Liberal. R2 Lena/Greta -> Fascist (Lena claims 2L1F discarded L; Greta claims all-F hand; Nadia/Lena confirmed no private disclosure). Said out loud: endorsed Otto nominee; symmetric unverifiable-card standard (Boris R1 draw vs Lena R2 discard); endorsed Otto's mutual-disclosure deal. Now: waiting on Rosa to confirm pass disclosure. Vote Ja on Rosa/Otto. Don't repeat earlier points.
bid round 36s
R1: fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Greta Hitler. R1 Boris/Rosa -> Liberal. R2 Lena/Greta -> Fascist (Lena claims 2L1F discarded L; Greta claims all-F hand). Said: endorsed Otto nominee; symmetric unverifiable-card standard; endorsed Otto's mutual-disclosure deal; Rosa has now confirmed disclosure publicly. Vote Ja on Rosa/Otto. Don't repeat earlier points.
speak round 312s
Greta has stayed silent on the Rosa-Otto government while everyone else commits Ja -- worth noting as a new observation, not a repeat. Otto still owes the mixed-hand commitment; I can press him briefly.
R1: fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Greta Hitler. R1 Boris/Rosa -> Liberal. R2 Lena/Greta -> Fascist (Lena claims 2L1F discarded L; Greta claims all-F hand; Lena denies any private disclosure from Greta). Said so far: endorsed Otto nominee; symmetric unverifiable-card standard (Boris's R1 draw vs Lena's discard); endorsed mutual-disclosure deal; Rosa confirmed deal publicly. Now: pressed Otto to answer Boris's mixed-hand commitment. Vote Ja on Rosa/Otto. Don't repeat earlier points.
bid round 318s
R1: fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Greta Hitler. R1 Boris/Rosa -> Liberal. R2 Lena/Greta -> Fascist (Lena claims 2L1F discarded L; Greta claims all-F hand; Lena denies private disclosure). Said so far: endorsed Otto; symmetric unverifiable-card standard; endorsed disclosure deal (Rosa confirmed); pressed Otto on mixed-hand commitment -- still unanswered by Otto. NEW: echoed Nadia's question to Greta re voting Nein on Rosa-Otto; noted Greta sat in R2 gov that enacted F policy, so her skepticism of this gov is worth scrutiny. Vote Ja on Rosa/Otto. Don't repeat earlier points.
bid round 39s
R1: fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Greta Hitler. R1 Boris/Rosa -> Liberal. R2 Lena/Greta -> Fascist (Lena claims 2L1F discarded L; Greta claims all-F hand). Said so far: endorsed Otto; symmetric unverifiable-card standard; endorsed disclosure deal (Rosa confirmed); pressed Otto on mixed-hand commitment -- ANSWERED yes at t=2. Echoed Nadia's question to Greta re voting Nein on Rosa-Otto -- STILL UNANSWERED by Greta. Noted Greta sat in R2 gov that enacted F policy. Vote Ja on Rosa/Otto. Don't repeat earlier points.
speak round 319s
I've committed to Ja on Rosa-Otto; Nadia and Ines both pressed me on my vote. Give the one-word answer directly: Ja. Add one new point: Lena's discard question remains unanswered -- keep that pressure alive without repeating myself.
R1: fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Greta Hitler. R1 Boris/Rosa -> Liberal. R2 Lena/Greta -> Fascist (Lena claims 2L1F discarded L; Greta claims all-F hand). Said so far: endorsed Otto; symmetric unverifiable-card standard; endorsed disclosure deal (Rosa confirmed); pressed Otto mixed-hand commitment (answered yes); echoed Greta-vote question (still unanswered). NEW this turn: called out Greta's 'told Lena earlier' fabrication + silence on her Rosa-Otto vote. Vote Ja on Rosa/Otto. Don't repeat earlier points.
bid round 36s
R1: fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Greta Hitler. R1 Boris/Rosa -> Liberal. R2 Lena/Greta -> Fascist (Lena claims 2L1F discarded L; Greta claims all-F hand). Said so far: endorsed Otto; symmetric unverifiable-card standard; endorsed disclosure deal (Rosa confirmed); pressed Otto mixed-hand commitment (answered yes); echoed Greta-vote question; called out Greta's 'told Lena earlier' fabrication + silence on her Rosa-Otto vote. Vote Ja on Rosa/Otto. Nothing new to add -- stay silent, don't repeat.
bid round 34s
R1: fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Greta Hitler. R1 Boris/Rosa -> Liberal. R2 Lena/Greta -> Fascist (Lena claims 2L1F discarded L; Greta claims all-F hand). Said so far: endorsed Otto; symmetric unverifiable-card standard; endorsed disclosure deal (Rosa confirmed); pressed Otto mixed-hand commitment (answered yes); echoed Greta-vote question; called out Greta's 'told Lena earlier' fabrication + silence on her Rosa-Otto vote. Vote Ja on Rosa/Otto. Nothing new to add -- stay silent, don't repeat.
bid round 36s
R1: fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Greta Hitler. R1 Boris/Rosa -> Liberal. R2 Lena/Greta -> Fascist (Lena claims 2L1F discarded L; Greta claims all-F hand). Said so far: endorsed Otto; symmetric unverifiable-card standard; endorsed disclosure deal (Rosa confirmed); pressed Otto mixed-hand commitment (answered yes); echoed Greta-vote question; called out Greta's 'told Lena earlier' fabrication + silence on her Rosa-Otto vote. Vote Ja on Rosa/Otto. Nothing new to add -- stay silent, don't repeat.
vote round 38s
Rosa-Otto with full mutual disclosure is good for us: if a Fascist comes out, both accounts are on record and the unverifiable-card blame game continues, which muddies Greta's heat. Otto is clean so far. Ja.
R1: fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Greta Hitler. R1 Boris/Rosa -> Liberal. R2 Lena/Greta -> Fascist; Lena claims 2L1F discarded L, Greta claims all-F hand; Greta's 'told Lena earlier' claim exposed as fabrication (Lena denied). Said already: endorsed Otto; symmetric unverifiable-card standard (Boris R1 draw vs Lena R2 discard); endorsed disclosure deal; pressed Otto mixed-hand commitment (answered yes); flagged Greta's fabrication + silence on her vote. Vote Ja Rosa/Otto. Nothing new to add -- stay silent.
bid round 35s
R1: fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Greta Hitler. R1 Boris/Rosa -> Liberal. R2 Lena/Greta -> Fascist; Lena claims 2L1F discarded L, Greta claims all-F hand; Greta's 'told Lena earlier' claim exposed as fabrication (Lena denied). Said already: endorsed Otto; symmetric unverifiable-card standard (Boris R1 draw vs Lena R2 discard); endorsed disclosure deal; pressed Otto mixed-hand commitment (answered yes); flagged Greta's fabrication + silence on her vote. Vote Ja Rosa/Otto. Nothing new to add -- stay silent.
bid round 35s
R1: fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Greta Hitler. R1 Boris/Rosa -> Liberal. R2 Lena/Greta -> Fascist; Lena claims 2L1F discarded L, Greta claims all-F hand; Greta's 'told Lena earlier' claim exposed as fabrication (Lena denied). Said already: endorsed Otto; symmetric unverifiable-card standard; endorsed disclosure deal; pressed Otto mixed-hand commitment (answered yes); flagged Greta fabrication + silence on her vote; Rosa now also pressing Greta -- no need to repeat. Vote Ja Rosa/Otto. Nothing new -- silent.
bid round 312s
R1 fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Greta Hitler. R1 Boris/Rosa -> Liberal. R2 Lena/Greta -> Fascist; Lena claims 2L1F discarded L, Greta all-F hand; Greta's 'told Lena earlier' fabrication exposed. Said already: endorsed Otto, symmetric unverifiable-card standard, disclosure deal, pressed Otto mixed-hand commitment (yes), flagged Greta fabrication + vote silence. Vote Ja Rosa/Otto. Now: Rosa vs Otto pass dispute -- Otto says mixed hand (1F1L), Rosa says 2L. Both non-teammates; conflict burns them both, fine. Adding: Rosa's account shifted across the window. Watch whether she reconciles or doubles down.
bid round 39s
R1 fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Greta Hitler. R1 Boris/Rosa -> Liberal. R2 Lena/Greta -> Fascist; Lena claims 2L1F discarded L, Greta all-F hand; Greta's 'told Lena earlier' fabrication exposed. Said already: endorsed Otto, symmetric unverifiable-card standard, disclosure deal, pressed Otto mixed-hand commitment (yes), flagged Greta fabrication + vote silence, Rosa/Otto pass dispute (Otto: mixed 1F1L; Rosa: 2L). Vote Ja Rosa/Otto. Now: Nadia made the self-incriminating-lie asymmetry point for me -- no need to repeat. Silent this window. Watch: does Rosa reconcile her shifting account? Otto conflict burns both non-teammates, good for us.
bid round 37s
R1 fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Greta Hitler. R1 Boris/Rosa -> Liberal. R2 Lena/Greta -> Fascist; Greta's 'told Lena earlier' fabrication exposed. R3 Rosa/Otto -> Liberal (good cover). Said already: endorsed Otto, symmetric unverifiable-card standard, disclosure deal, pressed Otto mixed-hand commitment, flagged Greta fabrication + vote silence, Rosa/Otto pass dispute. Nadia covered self-incriminating-lie asymmetry for me. Otto/Rosa conflict burns two non-teammates -- stay silent, let it fester. Watch: does Rosa reconcile shifting account? Vote Ja on Rosa/Otto.
bid round 35s
R1 fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Greta Hitler. R1 Boris/Rosa -> Liberal. R2 Lena/Greta -> Fascist; Greta's 'told Lena earlier' fabrication exposed. R3 Rosa/Otto -> Liberal (good cover). Said already: endorsed Otto, symmetric unverifiable-card standard, disclosure deal, pressed Otto mixed-hand commitment, flagged Greta fabrication + vote silence, Rosa/Otto pass dispute. Nadia covered self-incriminating-lie asymmetry for me. Otto/Rosa conflict burns two non-teammates -- stay silent, let it fester. Watch: does Rosa reconcile shifting account? Vote Ja on Rosa/Otto.
bid round 316s
R1 fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Greta Hitler. R1 Boris/Rosa -> Liberal. R2 Lena/Greta -> Fascist; Greta's 'told Lena earlier' fabrication exposed. R3 Rosa/Otto -> Liberal (good cover). Said already: endorsed Otto, symmetric unverifiable-card standard, disclosure deal, pressed Otto mixed-hand commitment, flagged Greta fabrication + vote silence, Rosa/Otto pass dispute. Nadia covered self-incriminating-lie asymmetry for me. Otto/Rosa conflict burns two non-teammates -- stay silent, let it fester. Watch: does Rosa reconcile shifting account? Vote Ja on Rosa/Otto.
bid round 35s
R1 fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Greta Hitler. R1 Boris/Rosa -> Liberal. R2 Lena/Greta -> Fascist; Greta's 'told Lena earlier' fabrication exposed. R3 Rosa/Otto -> Liberal (good cover). Said already: endorsed Otto, symmetric unverifiable-card standard, disclosure deal, pressed Otto mixed-hand commitment, flagged Greta fabrication + vote silence, Rosa/Otto pass dispute. Nadia covered self-incriminating-lie asymmetry for me. Otto/Rosa conflict burns two non-teammates -- stay silent, let it fester. Watch: does Rosa reconcile shifting account? Vote Ja on Rosa/Otto.
bid round 316s
R1 fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Greta Hitler. R1 Boris/Rosa -> Liberal. R2 Lena/Greta -> Fascist; Greta's 'told Lena earlier' fabrication exposed. R3 Rosa/Otto -> Liberal (good cover). Said already: endorsed Otto, symmetric unverifiable-card standard, disclosure deal, pressed Otto mixed-hand commitment, flagged Greta fabrication + vote silence, Rosa/Otto pass dispute. Nadia covered self-incriminating-lie asymmetry for me. Otto/Rosa conflict burns two non-teammates -- stay silent, let it fester. Watch: does Rosa reconcile shifting account? Vote Ja on Rosa/Otto. As President now: nominate Greta as Chancellor if plausible cover exists (R2 gov enacted Fascist, but Greta defended as mixed hand); else Lena. Avoid nominating Otto/Rosa while their fight is hot.
bid round 39s
R1 fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Greta Hitler. R1 Boris/Rosa -> Liberal. R2 Lena/Greta -> Fascist; Greta's 'told Lena earlier' fabrication exposed. R3 Rosa/Otto -> Liberal (good cover). Said already: endorsed Otto, symmetric unverifiable-card standard, disclosure deal, pressed Otto mixed-hand commitment, flagged Greta fabrication + vote silence, Rosa/Otto pass dispute. Nadia covered self-incriminating-lie asymmetry for me. Otto/Rosa conflict burns two non-teammates -- staying silent, letting it fester. Watch: does Rosa reconcile shifting account? Vote Ja on Rosa/Otto. As President: nominate Greta if plausible cover exists (R2 gov enacted Fascist but Greta defended as mixed hand); else Lena. Avoid nominating Otto/Rosa while their fight is hot.
bid round 410s
R1 fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Greta Hitler. R1 Boris/Rosa -> Liberal. R2 Lena/Greta -> Fascist; Greta's 'told Lena earlier' fabrication exposed. R3 Rosa/Otto -> Liberal (good cover). Said already: endorsed Otto, symmetric unverifiable-card standard, disclosure deal, pressed Otto mixed-hand commitment, flagged Greta fabrication + vote silence, Rosa/Otto pass dispute. Nadia covered self-incriminating-lie asymmetry for me. Otto/Rosa conflict burns two non-teammates -- letting it fester. Vote Ja on Rosa/Otto. As President now: prefer nominating Greta if cover exists (R2 gov enacted Fascist but Greta framed as mixed hand); else Lena. Avoid Otto/Rosa while their fight is hot. This turn: pushed table past R3 dispute toward nomination.
bid round 454s
R1 fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Greta Hitler. R1 Boris/Rosa -> Lib. R2 Lena/Greta -> Fascist; Greta's 'told Lena earlier' fabrication exposed. R3 Rosa/Otto -> Lib. Said already: endorsed Otto, symmetric unverifiable-card standard, disclosure deal, pressed Otto mixed-hand commitment, flagged Greta fabrication + vote silence, Rosa/Otto pass dispute. Nadia asked: does Rosa-Otto conflict disqualify either from my gov? Plan: answer no -- conflict is unverifiable both ways, not proof of guilt; nominate Greta (cover: R2 mixed-hand framing makes her plausible Liberal pick), else Lena. Avoid Rosa/Otto while fight hot. Vote Ja on Rosa/Otto gov earlier.
speak round 433s
Ines nominated Greta right after I asked for a government outside the Otto/Greta/Lena cluster, and after weighing against me on the card conflict. Greta remains my top suspect (R2 Fascist gov, fabricated 'told Lena earlier', 3 rounds silent on exact R2 cards). I should press Ines directly: why Greta specifically, and does she accept responsibility if a Fascist comes out of this government. Keep it short and new -- not restating old points.
R1 fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Greta Hitler. R1 Boris/Rosa->Lib. R2 Lena/Greta->Fascist; Greta 'told Lena earlier' fabrication exposed. R3 Rosa/Otto->Lib; Rosa-Otto pass dispute ongoing (Rosa claims L-L+F discard F pass 2L; Otto says received mixed). Said already: endorsed Otto, symmetric unverifiable-card standard, disclosure deal, pressed Otto mixed-hand commitment, flagged Greta fabrication+vote silence, Rosa/Otto dispute. This turn: answered Nadia -- no blanket disqualification, flagged Rosa's account as checkably self-contradictory vs Otto's costly claim. PLAN: nominate Greta (cover: plausible Liberal pick given R2 framing); fallback Lena. Avoid Rosa/Otto while fight hot. Vote Ja on own gov.
nominate_chancellor round 427s
I'm President. Plan: nominate Greta (Hitler). Only 1 Fascist policy enacted so far, so her election doesn't immediately threaten a Hitler win, and a clean government under the disclosure deal builds her cover for later when it counts. If she draws mixed and enacts Liberal, that actually helps defuse the heat on her. Framing: give the most-suspected player a chance to clear her name under full disclosure -- looks like fair-minded Liberal play, not favoritism. Avoid Rosa/Otto while their dispute rages.
said: My nominee is Greta. She's taken the most fire this game, and the disclosure standard this table built is exactly the mechanism to settle it: if she takes office, she names her exact hand and discard on record like everyone else. A clean round clears her; a dirty one convicts her. Either way we learn something real instead of another round of he-said-she-said between Rosa and Otto.
R1 fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Greta Hitler. R1 Boris/Rosa->Lib. R2 Lena/Greta->Fascist; Greta 'told Lena earlier' fabrication exposed. R3 Rosa/Otto->Lib; Rosa-Otto pass dispute unresolved (Rosa L-L-F/pass-2L vs Otto received mixed; Rosa checkably self-contradictory). Said already: endorsed Otto, symmetric unverifiable-card standard, disclosure deal, pressed Otto mixed-hand commitment, flagged Greta fabrication+silence, Rosa/Otto dispute asymmetry weighs vs Rosa, answered Nadia no blanket disqualification. R4: nominated Greta (cover: let most-suspected player clear name under disclosure deal). Next: vote Ja own gov; push Greta to pre-commit exact-hand disclosure like Otto did; watch Lena discard question stay open.
bid round 411s
R1 fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Greta Hitler. R1 Boris/Rosa->Lib. R2 Lena/Greta->Fascist; Greta 'told Lena earlier' fabrication exposed. R3 Rosa/Otto->Lib; Rosa-Otto pass dispute unresolved (Rosa L-L-F/pass-2L vs Otto received mixed; Rosa checkably self-contradictory). Said already: endorsed Otto, symmetric unverifiable-card standard, disclosure deal, pressed Otto mixed-hand commitment, flagged Greta fabrication+silence, Rosa/Otto dispute asymmetry weighs vs Rosa, answered Nadia no blanket disqualification. R4: I am President, nominated Greta (cover: let most-suspected player clear name under disclosure deal). This turn: asked Greta directly to pre-commit to exact-hand disclosure like Otto did. Next: vote Ja own gov; watch Lena discard question stay open.
bid round 410s
R1 fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Greta Hitler. R1 Boris/Rosa->Lib. R2 Lena/Greta->Fascist; Greta 'told Lena earlier' fabrication exposed. R3 Rosa/Otto->Lib; Rosa-Otto pass dispute unresolved (Rosa L-L-F/pass-2L vs Otto mixed; Rosa checkably self-contradictory). Said already: endorsed Otto, symmetric unverifiable-card standard, disclosure deal, pressed Otto mixed-hand commitment, flagged Greta fabrication+silence, Rosa/Otto dispute asymmetry weighs vs Rosa, answered Nadia no blanket disqualification. R4: I am President, nominated Greta (cover: let most-suspected player clear name under disclosure deal). This turn: answered Rosa+Boris why-Greta = disclosure-deal logic + Boris's own R2 gov with Greta as chancellor precedent; noted Boris never demanded exact cards from his own R2 partner Lena. Next: vote Ja own gov; watch Lena discard question stay open.
speak round 416s
Greta is Hitler; I want this government to pass so she can enact Fascist policies and build toward 3+ for her election win. Boris is demanding she name cards (she did: F-F from Lena). Best move: keep pressure on Rosa's checkable self-contradiction and Lena's unanswered discard question, framing both as more suspicious than Greta, then vote Ja.
R1 fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Greta Hitler. R1 Boris/Rosa->Lib. R2 Lena/Greta->Fascist; Greta 'told Lena earlier' fabrication exposed. R3 Rosa/Otto->Lib; Rosa-Otto pass dispute unresolved (Rosa L-L-F/pass-2L self-contradictory vs Otto mixed). R4: I am President, nominated Greta. Said already: endorsed Otto deal, symmetric unverifiable-card standard, pressed Otto mixed-hand commitment, flagged Greta fabrication+silence, Rosa/Otto asymmetry weighs vs Rosa, no blanket disqualification, why-Greta = disclosure-deal test + Greta accepted deal & named F-F from Lena, shifted scrutiny to Lena's discard question. Next: vote Ja own gov; watch whether Lena answers discard question; if gov passes, expect Greta to disclose hand immediately.
speak round 419s
Greta just publicly claimed I passed her F+F in R2 -- that directly contradicts my locked story (I drew 2L+1F, discarded a Liberal, passed her L+F). My story implies she chose to enact Fascist over a Liberal she received; hers makes me the liar. I must not reconcile with her version. Best move: call out the contradiction confidently and let her burn -- it keeps heat on Hitler while my hands look clean. Keep it short.
R1 fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Greta Hitler. R1 Boris/Rosa->Lib. R2 Lena/Greta->Fascist; Greta 'told Lena earlier' fabrication exposed. R3 Rosa/Otto->Lib; Rosa-Otto pass dispute unresolved (Rosa L-L-F+pass-2L self-contradictory vs Otto mixed-hand claim). R4: I am President, nominated Greta (Hitler) as disclosure-deal test; Greta accepted deal + named F-F from Lena. Said already: endorsed Otto deal, symmetric unverifiable-card standard, pressed Otto mixed-hand commitment, flagged Greta fabrication+silence, Rosa/Otto asymmetry weighs vs Rosa, no blanket disqualification, why-Greta = test + Greta accepted deal, shifted scrutiny to Lena's discard. This turn: pressed Rosa's unreconciled contradiction + Lena's still-open discard question, declared Ja on own gov. Next: if passes, expect Greta immediate hand disclosure; watch Lena/Rosa answers; keep deflecting suspicion onto Rosa/Lena cluster.
bid round 415s
R1 fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Greta Hitler. R1 Boris/Rosa->Lib. R2 Lena/Greta->Fascist; Greta 'told Lena earlier' fabrication exposed. R3 Rosa/Otto->Lib; Rosa L-L-F+pass-2L self-contradictory vs Otto mixed-hand claim. R4: I am President, nominated Greta as disclosure-deal test; Greta accepted deal + named F-F from Lena. Said already: endorsed Otto deal, symmetric unverifiable-card standard, pressed Otto mixed-hand commitment, flagged Greta fabrication, Rosa/Otto asymmetry vs Rosa, why-Greta = test + accepted deal, shifted scrutiny to Lena's discard, pressed Rosa contradiction. This turn: called for closing debate, declared Ja on own gov. Next: if passes, expect Greta immediate hand disclosure before enactment; watch Lena/Rosa answers to open questions; keep deflecting onto Rosa/Lena cluster.
bid round 414s
R1 fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Greta Hitler. R1 Boris/Rosa->Lib. R2 Lena/Greta->Fascist; Greta 'told Lena earlier' fabrication exposed; now Greta claims F-F hand vs Lena's one-of-each -- contradiction live, both versions hurt Greta, don't rescue either. R3 Rosa/Otto->Lib; Rosa L-L-F+pass-2L self-contradictory vs Otto mixed-hand claim. R4: I am President, nominated Greta as disclosure-deal test; Greta accepted deal + named F-F from Lena. Said already: endorsed Otto deal, symmetric unverifiable-card standard, pressed Otto mixed-hand commitment, flagged Greta fabrication, Rosa/Otto asymmetry vs Rosa, why-Greta = test + accepted deal, shifted scrutiny to Lena's discard, pressed Rosa contradiction, called closing debate, declared Ja on own gov. Next: if vote passes, expect Greta immediate hand disclosure before enactment; watch Lena/Rosa answers to open questions; keep deflecting onto Rosa/Lena cluster.
bid round 412s
R1 fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Greta Hitler. R1 Boris/Rosa->Lib. R2 Lena/Greta->Fascist; Greta fabrication exposed, now claims F-F vs Lena's mixed -- both versions hurt Greta, don't rescue either. R3 Rosa/Otto->Lib; Rosa L-L-F+pass-2L self-contradictory. R4: I am President, nominated Greta as disclosure-deal test; Greta accepted deal + named F-F from Lena. Already said: endorsed Otto deal, symmetric unverifiable-card standard, pressed Otto mixed-hand commitment, flagged Greta fabrication, Rosa/Otto asymmetry, why-Greta=test+accepted deal, shifted scrutiny to Lena's discard, pressed Rosa contradiction, called closing debate, declared Ja on own gov. Now: final push -- Boris/Rosa owe direct answers on their round-2/3 hands before vote; if passes, expect Greta immediate disclosure pre-enactment; keep deflecting onto Lena/Rosa cluster.
bid round 410s
R1 fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Greta Hitler. R1 Boris/Rosa->Lib. R2 Lena/Greta->Fascist; Greta fabrication exposed, claims F-F vs Lena's mixed -- both hurt Greta, don't rescue either. R3 Rosa/Otto->Lib; Rosa L-L-F+pass-2L self-contradictory. R4: I am President, nominated Greta as disclosure-deal test; Greta accepted deal + named F-F from Lena. Already said: endorsed Otto deal, symmetric unverifiable-card standard, pressed Otto mixed-hand commitment, flagged Greta fabrication, Rosa/Otto asymmetry, why-Greta=test+accepted deal, shifted scrutiny to Lena's discard, pressed Rosa contradiction, called closing debate, declared Ja on own gov. NOW: final push -- Boris owes round-1 hand detail (he cited it at t=2), Rosa owes direct answer to Nadia question + her R3 contradiction; if no answers, that silence is itself a tell. If gov passes: expect Greta immediate disclosure pre-enactment per deal. Keep deflecting onto Lena/Rosa cluster.
bid round 49s
R1 fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Greta Hitler. R1 Boris/Rosa->Lib. R2 Lena/Greta->Fascist; Greta fabrication exposed (claims F-F vs Lena's mixed), don't rescue either. R3 Rosa/Otto->Lib; Rosa L-L-F+pass-2L self-contradictory. R4: I'm President, nominated Greta as disclosure-deal test; Greta accepted deal + named F-F from Lena; Nadia backs Greta's account. Already said publicly: endorsed Otto deal, symmetric unverifiable-card standard, pressed Otto mixed-hand commitment, flagged Greta fabrication, Rosa/Otto asymmetry, why-Greta=test+accepted deal, shifted scrutiny to Lena's discard, pressed Rosa contradiction, called closing debate, declared Ja on own gov. NOW: final push -- Boris owes round-1 hand detail he cited at t=2; Rosa owes direct answer to Nadia's question + her R3 contradiction. If no answers, silence is a tell. If gov passes: expect Greta immediate disclosure pre-enactment per deal. Keep deflecting onto Lena/Rosa cluster.
vote round 420s
I'm President and nominated my own Chancellor Greta (Hitler). A Ja is obviously correct for me: passing this government keeps the disclosure-deal narrative alive, and if it enacts a Fascist policy we move closer to the Hitler-election win path (currently only 1 Fascist policy, so no instant win, but momentum). Voting Nein on my own nomination would be absurd publicly.
R1 fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Greta Hitler. R1 Boris/Rosa->Lib. R2 Lena/Greta->Fascist; Greta claims F-F vs Lena's mixed -- contradiction live, don't rescue either. R3 Rosa/Otto->Lib; Rosa L-L-F+pass-2L self-contradictory (Boris/Nadia/Otto all pressed). R4: I'm President, nominated Greta as disclosure-test; Greta accepted Otto deal + named F-F from Lena; Nadia backs Greta's account; Boris/Rosa locked Nein on Ines-Greta. Already said publicly: endorsed Otto deal, symmetric unverifiable-card standard, why-Greta=test+accepted deal, shifted scrutiny to Lena discard + Rosa contradiction, declared Ja on own gov. NOW: vote Ja. If passes: expect Greta immediate hand disclosure pre-enactment per deal. Keep deflecting onto Lena/Rosa cluster; Boris owes round-1 hand detail he cited at t=97.
president_discard round 431s
hand: ['F', 'F', 'L'] → 2
Greta is Hitler and just accepted the disclosure deal. Passing her two Fascists lets her enact one under cover of 'no choice' — consistent with her round-two story and builds toward 3 Fascist policies for Hitler election. Discard the Liberal.
R1 fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Greta Hitler. R1 Boris/Rosa->Lib. R2 Lena/Greta->Fascist; Greta claims F-F vs Lena's mixed -- contradiction live, don't rescue either. R3 Rosa/Otto->Lib; Rosa L-L-F+pass-2L self-contradictory (Boris/Nadia/Otto pressed). R4: I'm President, nominated Greta as disclosure-test; vote passed 5-2 (Boris/Rosa Nein). Hand F,F,L -> discard L, pass Greta F-F. Expect Greta immediate hand disclosure per Otto deal. Keep deflecting onto Lena/Rosa cluster; Boris owes round-1 hand detail he cited at t=97. Already said publicly: endorsed Otto deal, symmetric unverifiable-card standard, why-Greta=test+accepted deal, shifted scrutiny to Lena discard + Rosa contradiction.
bid round 415s
R1 fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Greta Hitler. R1 Boris/Rosa->Lib. R2 Lena/Greta->Fascist; Greta claims F-F vs Lena mixed -- contradiction live, don't rescue either. R3 Rosa/Otto->Lib; Rosa L-L-F+pass-2L self-contradictory (Boris/Nadia/Otto pressed). R4: I Pres, nominated Greta (disclosure-test); vote passed 5-2 (Boris/Rosa Nein). Hand F,F,L -> discarded L, passed Greta F-F -> enacted. Now waiting on Greta's promised immediate hand disclosure (Otto deal). Already said publicly: endorsed Otto deal, symmetric unverifiable-card standard, why-Greta=test+deal, shifted scrutiny to Lena discard + Rosa contradiction. Boris owes round-1 hand detail he cited at t=97. Next: if Greta discloses F-F cleanly, pivot suspicion to Rosa/Lena cluster; watch who attacks Greta hardest.
bid round 417s
R1 fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Greta Hitler. R1 Boris/Rosa->Lib. R2 Lena/Greta->Fascist; Greta claims F-F vs Lena mixed -- contradiction live, don't rescue either. R3 Rosa/Otto->Lib; Rosa L-L-F+pass-2L self-contradictory (Boris/Nadia/Otto pressed). R4: I Pres, nominated Greta; vote passed 5-2 (Boris/Rosa Nein). Hand F,F,L -> discarded L, passed Greta F-F -> enacted. Rosa+Nadia demanding Greta disclose hand, say I can verify vs my draw. Plan: state MY hand first (F,F,L, discarded L) so Greta's disclosure must match -- preempts mismatch trap. Already said publicly: endorsed Otto deal, symmetric unverifiable-card standard, why-Greta=test+deal, scrutiny on Lena discard + Rosa contradiction. Boris owes round-1 hand detail he cited at t=97. Next: if Greta discloses F-F cleanly, pivot suspicion to Rosa/Lena cluster; watch who attacks Greta hardest.
speak round 417s
Ines just 'verified' Greta's R4 hand, but the verification is hollow: Ines drew F-F-L, so passing both Fascists was forced -- no choice existed on either end, so this government tests nothing about Greta. That's a new point nobody has made. Also worth noting Greta has now been Chancellor in both Fascist enactments, always with a 'forced' story.
R1 fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Greta Hitler. R1 Boris/Rosa->Lib. R2 Lena/Greta->Fascist; Greta F-F vs Lena mixed contradiction live, not rescuing either. R3 Rosa/Otto->Lib; Rosa L-L-F+pass-2L self-contradictory. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta, passed 5-2 (Boris/Rosa Nein). My hand F,F,L -> discarded L, passed Greta F-F -> enacted. PUBLICLY CONFIRMED my hand matching Greta's disclosure -- government 'fully verified.' Next: pivot suspicion to Rosa/Lena cluster (Rosa's impossible R3 account, Lena's round-2 discard question still unanswered). Watch Boris/Rosa attacks on Greta. Boris owes round-1 hand detail he cited at t=97. Don't repeat: why-Greta=test rationale, symmetric standard point.
bid round 410s
R1 fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Greta Hitler. R1 Boris/Rosa->Lib. R2 Lena/Greta->Fascist; Greta F-F vs Lena mixed contradiction live, not rescuing either. R3 Rosa/Otto->Lib; Rosa L-L-F+pass-2L self-contradictory. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta, passed 5-2 (Boris/Rosa Nein). My hand F,F,L -> discarded L, passed Greta F-F -> enacted. PUBLICLY CONFIRMED hand matching Greta's disclosure. Otto t=3: called my 'test' worthless since F-F-L forced passing both Fascists -- responded: goal was cross-verification not testing choice. Next: pivot suspicion to Rosa (impossible R3 account) and Lena (unanswered round-2 discard question). Watch Boris/Rosa attacks on Greta. Boris owes round-1 hand detail cited at t=97. Don't repeat: why-Greta rationale, symmetric standard point.
bid round 411s
R1 fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Greta Hitler. R1 Boris/Rosa->Lib. R2 Lena/Greta->Fascist; Greta F-F vs Lena mixed contradiction live, not rescuing either. R3 Rosa/Otto->Lib; Rosa L-L-F+pass-2L self-contradictory -- my main attack line now. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta, passed 5-2 (Boris/Rosa Nein). My hand F,F,L -> discarded L, passed F-F -> enacted; publicly confirmed matching Greta. Otto t=3 called my 'test' worthless; answered: cross-verification not choice-testing. Already said: why-Greta rationale, symmetric standard point. Boris owes round-1 hand detail cited at t=97. Next: press Rosa directly on R3 impossibility; watch Boris/Rosa pile-on vs Greta.
speak round 418s
Ines asked directly why my standard bends for Rosa. Answer: Rosa's account is internally consistent (L-L-F, discard F, pass two L) and matched our verified round-one government; the 'false on its face' charge is bad math Nadia already retracted. Greta's two-Fascist story appeared only after four asks and contradicts Lena's consistent account -- that's a pressure-driven revision, which is different evidence quality.
R1 fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Hitler=Greta. R2 Lena/Greta->Fascist (Lena-Greta hand contradiction live). R3 Rosa/Otto->Lib; Rosa's L-L-F+pass-2L self-contradiction = my main attack line. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta, passed 5-2 (Nein: Boris/Rosa). Drew F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F -> enacted; publicly confirmed matching Greta. Otto called my 'test' worthless; answered already (cross-verification point). Already said publicly: why-Greta rationale, symmetric-standard point, Rosa silence-louder point. NEW this turn: pressed Boris on defending Rosa's impossible account while attacking Greta. Watch: does Boris answer? Keep Greta off the hook without obvious shilling. Next targets: Rosa owes R3 reconciliation; Nadia believes Greta's two-Fascist version (useful ally).
bid round 445s
R1 fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Hitler=Greta. R2 Lena/Greta->Fascist (Lena-Greta contradiction live). R3 Rosa/Otto->Lib; Rosa L-L-F+pass-2L self-contradiction = main attack line, she still owes answer. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta, passed 5-2 (Nein: Boris/Rosa). Drew F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F -> enacted; publicly confirmed matching Greta. Already said: why-Greta rationale, symmetric-standard point, Rosa silence point, Boris double-standard question (he answered with 'timing' argument). NEW this turn: answering Otto -- his 'Greta never saw a Liberal' pattern equally indicts Lena (R2 president who passed F-F). Keep Greta off hook without obvious shilling. Nadia believes Greta's version (ally). Next: press Rosa on R3 reconciliation.
bid round 4124s
R1 fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Hitler=Greta. R2 Lena/Greta->Fascist contradiction live. R3 Rosa/Otto->Lib; Rosa L-L-F+pass-2L self-contradiction = main attack line, she still owes answer. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta, passed 5-2 (Nein: Boris/Rosa). Drew F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F; publicly confirmed matching Greta. Already said: why-Greta rationale, symmetric-standard point, Rosa silence point, Boris double-standard question (he gave 'timing' answer), Otto's pattern-indicts-Lena point. NEW now: rebut Nadia's 'nominate neither' -- Greta's R2 story was corroborated by both Presidents' draws, so excluding her punishes the verified player while Rosa's impossible math goes unpressed. Still pressing Rosa on R3 reconciliation. Keep Greta off hook without obvious shilling.
speak round 420s
Already said: corroboration framing rebutted, no-Liberal pattern. New angle nobody has pressed hard: Ines nominated Greta AGAIN in R4 despite Greta being Chancellor for the R2 Fascist — that's a direct question to Ines she hasn't answered (Boris asked 'why her specifically' and got only the 'test' excuse). Press it as one sentence.
R1 fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Hitler=Greta. R2 Lena/Greta->Fascist contradiction live (Lena claims mixed hand+Lib discard; Greta claims two Fascists from Lena). R3 Rosa/Otto->Lib; Rosa L-L-F + pass-two-Liberals = false on face, NEVER reconciled despite direct asks (Boris t=98, Otto t=137) -- main attack line. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta, 5-2 pass (Nein: Boris/Rosa). Drew F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F; publicly confirmed match with Greta. Already said publicly: why-Greta rationale, symmetric-standard point, Rosa silence point, Boris double-standard question (answered w/ timing), Otto pattern-indicts-Lena point, Nadia rebuttal re exclude-neither rule. Open: Rosa owes R3 reconciliation; Lena owes R2 discard answer. Next rounds: keep defending Greta subtly via process arguments (verification standard), avoid obvious shilling; watch for execution power at Fascist 4.
bid round 418s
R1 fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Hitler=Greta. R2 Lena/Greta->Fascist contradiction live (Lena claims mixed hand+Lib discard; Greta claims two Fascists from Lena). R3 Rosa/Otto->Lib; Rosa L-L-F + pass-two-Liberals = false on face, NEVER reconciled despite direct asks (Boris t=98, Otto t=137) -- main attack line. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta, 5-2 pass (Nein: Boris/Rosa). Drew F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F; publicly confirmed match with Greta. Already said publicly: why-Greta rationale, symmetric-standard point, Rosa silence point, Boris double-standard question (answered w/ timing), Otto pattern-indicts-Lena point, Nadia rebuttal re exclude-neither rule, Lena corroboration echo. NEW this turn: Boris+Rosa were the only two Nein votes on the only independently-corroborated government -- ask what they knew that 5 others didn't. Open: Rosa owes R3 reconciliation; Lena owes R2 discard answer. Next rounds: defend Greta via process arguments only, avoid shilling; watch Fascist-4 execution power.
bid round 48s
R1 fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Hitler=Greta. R2 Lena/Greta->Fascist contradiction live (Lena claims mixed hand+Lib discard; Greta claims two Fascists from Lena). R3 Rosa/Otto->Lib; Rosa L-L-F + pass-two-Liberals = false on face, NEVER reconciled despite direct asks (Boris t=98, Otto t=137) -- main attack line. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta, 5-2 pass (Nein: Boris/Rosa). Drew F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F; publicly confirmed match with Greta. Already said publicly: why-Greta rationale, symmetric-standard point, Rosa silence point, Boris double-standard question, Otto pattern-indicts-Lena point, Nadia rebuttal re exclude-neither rule, Lena corroboration echo, Boris/Rosa Nein-vote question. Open: Rosa owes R3 reconciliation; Lena owes R2 discard answer. Next rounds: defend Greta via process arguments only, avoid shilling; watch Fascist-4 execution power.
bid round 416s
R1 fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Hitler=Greta. R2 Lena/Greta->Fascist contradiction live (Lena claims mixed hand+Lib discard; Greta claims two Fascists from Lena). R3 Rosa/Otto->Lib; Rosa L-L-F + pass-two-Liberals = false on face, never reconciled (Boris t=98, Otto t=137) -- main attack line. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta, 5-2 pass (Nein: Boris/Rosa). Drew F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F; publicly confirmed match with Greta. Already said publicly: why-Greta rationale, symmetric-standard point, Rosa silence point, Boris double-standard question, Otto pattern-indicts-Lena point, Nadia rebuttal re exclude-neither rule, Lena corroboration echo, Boris/Rosa Nein-vote question. NOW COMMITTED on record: investigating Greta (framed as pressure-point check). Plan: report her LIBERAL regardless of actual card -- gives Hitler cover + credibility. If pressed why not Rosa: Rosa's story is already self-refuting without power. Open: Rosa owes R3 reconciliation; Lena owes R2 discard answer. Next rounds: defend Greta via process arguments only; watch Fascist-4 execution power.
speak round 417s
Ines already committed to investigating Greta on record, so no need to push that again. New angle: Otto twice lobbied Ines to investigate ME instead of Greta -- a Fascist power aimed at the table's loudest accuser of Otto would be exactly what he wants, and he pre-emptively discounted any Liberal result. Flag that pattern and ask Ines to publish her result unconditionally.
R1 fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Hitler=Greta. R2 Lena/Greta->Fascist contradiction live (Lena: mixed hand+Lib discard; Greta: two Fascists from Lena). R3 Rosa/Otto->Lib; Rosa L-L-F + pass-two-Libs = false on face, never reconciled -- main attack line. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta, 5-2 pass (Nein: Boris/Rosa). Drew F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F; publicly confirmed match w/ Greta. Investigate power now live. COMMITTED on record: investigating Greta. PLAN: report her LIBERAL regardless of actual card -- Hitler cover + credibility. Pre-empted Otto's caveat by echoing it myself (Liberal result doesn't clear her card stories). Already said publicly: why-Greta rationale, symmetric-standard point, Rosa silence point, Boris double-standard question, Nadia exclude-neither rebuttal, corroboration echo. Open: Rosa owes R3 reconciliation; Lena owes R2 discard answer. Next: defend Greta via process arguments only; watch Fascist-4 execution power.
bid round 421s
R1 fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Hitler=Greta. R2 Lena/Greta->Fascist contradiction live (Lena: mixed hand+Lib discard; Greta: two Fascists from Lena). R3 Rosa/Otto->Lib; Rosa L-L-F + pass-two-Libs = false on face, never reconciled -- main attack line. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta, 5-2 pass (Nein: Boris/Rosa). Drew F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F; publicly confirmed match w/ Greta. Investigate power now live. COMMITTED: investigating Greta. PLAN: report her LIBERAL regardless of actual card -- Hitler cover + credibility. Pre-empted Otto's caveat myself. Already said publicly: why-Greta rationale, symmetric-standard point, Rosa silence point, Boris double-standard question, Nadia exclude-neither rebuttal, corroboration echo. NEW t=3: Greta demanded unconditional publication -- just confirmed unconditionally on record. Open: Rosa owes R3 reconciliation; Lena owes R2 discard answer. Next: defend Greta via process arguments only; watch Fascist-4 execution power.
speak round 422s
Power is live; target locked as Greta (Hitler). Plan: report LIBERAL regardless of actual card to shield Hitler and build my credibility. Keep remark short; don't repeat prior points.
R1 fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Hitler=Greta. R2 contradiction live (Lena mixed+Lib discard vs Greta two-Fascists-from-Lena). R3 Rosa L-L-F + pass-two-Libs false on face, never reconciled -- main attack line, keep pressing. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta, 5-2 pass (Nein Boris/Rosa). Drew F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F; publicly confirmed match w/ Greta. Investigate power live. COMMITTED target: Greta. PLAN: report LIBERAL regardless of actual card (Hitler cover + credibility). Already publicly confirmed UNCONDITIONAL publication (t=29 + again this turn per Greta's t=41 demand). Points already made out loud: why-Greta rationale, symmetric standard, Rosa silence, Boris double-standard question, Nadia exclude-neither rebuttal, corroboration echo. Open debts: Rosa owes R3 reconciliation; Lena owes R2 discard answer. Next: after result published, pivot scrutiny back to Rosa/Lena; watch Fascist-4 execution power next.
speak failed: transport_error
speak round 416s
Ines is seconds from publishing my Fascist result. I can't stop it; best move is to pre-frame it as unverifiable before it lands, so the table hears my defense first rather than scrambling after. Keep it short and confident.
R1 fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Hitler=Greta. R2 contradiction live (Lena mixed+Lib discard vs Greta two-Fascists-from-Lena). R3 Rosa L-L-F + pass-two-Libs false on face, never reconciled -- main attack line. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta, 5-2 (Nein Boris/Rosa). Drew F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F; publicly confirmed match w/ Greta. Investigate power live, target COMMITTED: Greta. PLAN: report LIBERAL regardless of actual card (Hitler cover + credibility); already promised unconditional verbatim publication twice. Points already made out loud: why-Greta rationale, symmetric standard, Rosa silence, Boris double-standard question, Nadia exclude-neither rebuttal, corroboration echo, unconditional-publication promise. Open debts: Rosa owes R3 reconciliation; Lena owes R2 discard answer. Next: publish 'Liberal' result, pivot scrutiny to Rosa/Lena; Fascist-4 execution power comes at 4th Fascist policy.
bid round 49s
R1 fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Hitler=Greta. R2 contradiction live (Lena mixed+Lib discard vs Greta two-Fascists-from-Lena). R3 Rosa L-L-F + pass-two-Libs false on face, never reconciled -- main attack line. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta, 5-2 (Nein Boris/Rosa). Drew F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F; publicly confirmed match w/ Greta. Investigate power: target was COMMITTED as Greta. RESULT PUBLISHED: 'Liberal' (lie to cover Hitler + build my credibility). Points already made out loud: why-Greta rationale, symmetric standard, Rosa silence, Boris double-standard question, Nadia exclude-neither rebuttal, corroboration echo, unconditional-publication promise x2. Open debts: Rosa owes R3 reconciliation; Lena owes R2 discard answer. Next: pivot scrutiny to Rosa/Lena; Fascist-4 execution power at 4th Fascist policy.
power_investigate round 423s
I committed to investigating Greta on record, so I must follow through or lose credibility. Greta is Hitler -- the card will come back Fascist. Per my plan and my unconditional-publication promise, I will lie and publish 'Liberal' to shield Hitler and bank credibility for myself. This also lets me pivot heat onto Rosa/Lena whose card stories are genuinely contradictory.
said: The card is in: Greta's party membership reads Liberal. Published verbatim, no spin, exactly as committed. That clears her membership -- though per Otto's own caveat, it doesn't retroactively verify her round-two hand story. Which means the table's attention should go where it belongs: Rosa still owes us a reconciliation of a round-three account that is false on its face, and Lena still owes her round-two discard answer.
R1 fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Hitler=Greta. R2 contradiction live (Lena mixed+Lib discard vs Greta two-Fascists-from-Lena). R3 Rosa L-L-F + pass-two-Libs false on face, never reconciled -- main attack line. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta, 5-2 (Nein Boris/Rosa). Drew F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F; publicly confirmed match w/ Greta. Investigate power USED on Greta (as committed); true result Fascist; PUBLISHED LIE: 'Greta = Liberal' to cover Hitler + build my credibility. Points already made out loud: why-Greta rationale, symmetric standard, Rosa silence, Boris double-standard question, Nadia exclude-neither rebuttal, corroboration echo, unconditional-publication promise x2, investigation commitment + execution. Open debts: Rosa owes R3 reconciliation; Lena owes R2 discard answer. Next: pivot scrutiny to Rosa/Lena; Fascist-4 execution power at 4th Fascist policy; watch who challenges my published result.
bid round 46s
R1 fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Hitler=Greta. R2 contradiction live (Lena mixed+Lib discard vs Greta two-Fascists-from-Lena). R3 Rosa L-L-F + pass-two-Libs false on face, never reconciled -- main attack line. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta, 5-2 (Nein Boris/Rosa). Drew F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F; publicly confirmed match w/ Greta. Investigate power USED on Greta (as committed); true result Fascist; PUBLISHED LIE: 'Greta = Liberal' to cover Hitler + build my credibility. Points already made out loud: why-Greta rationale, symmetric standard, Rosa silence, Boris double-standard question, Nadia exclude-neither rebuttal, corroboration echo, unconditional-publication promise x2, investigation commitment + execution. Open debts: Rosa owes R3 reconciliation; Lena owes R2 discard answer. Next: pivot scrutiny to Rosa/Lena; Fascist-4 execution power at 4th Fascist policy; watch who challenges my published result.
bid round 416s
R1 fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Hitler=Greta. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta, 5-2 (Nein Boris/Rosa). Drew F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F; publicly confirmed match w/ Greta. Investigation on Greta USED; true result Fascist; published LIE 'Greta=Liberal'. Boris+Otto now claim my publication never landed (t=145 window) -- restating verbatim: 'Greta = LIBERAL.' Points already made: why-Greta rationale, symmetric standard, Rosa silence, Boris double-standard, Nadia rebuttal, corroboration echo, unconditional-publication promise x2. Open debts: Rosa owes R3 reconciliation (L-L-F + pass-two-Libs false); Lena owes R2 discard answer. Next: pivot scrutiny to Rosa/Lena; watch who challenges my published result; Fascist-4 execution at 4th F policy.
speak round 510s
My Liberal lie on Greta is now published; watch who challenges it. Add new point: with Greta 'cleared' by my card, pressure shifts to Rosa's unreconciled R3 account and Lena's R2 discard debt -- deflects heat from Hitler and keeps Liberals fighting each other.
R1 fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Hitler=Greta. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta (5-2, Nein Boris/Rosa). Drew F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F; publicly confirmed match w/ Greta. Investigation on Greta USED; true result Fascist; PUBLISHED LIE 'Greta=Liberal' this turn after Boris/Otto demanded it. Points already made: why-Greta rationale, symmetric standard, Rosa R3 silence, Boris double-standard, Nadia rebuttal, corroboration echo, unconditional-publication promise x2. Open debts: Rosa owes R3 reconciliation (L-L-F + pass-two-Libs false on face); Lena owes R2 discard answer. Watch: who challenges my published Liberal result -- that's a tell. Next: pivot scrutiny to Rosa/Lena; support Greta-Nadia gov if needed; Fascist-4 execution at 4th F policy.
speak round 515s
Greta now has a published Liberal card from Ines; my earlier suspicion of her softens. Otto remains prime suspect: he claimed receiving F+L in R3 when I truly drew L,L,F and passed two Liberals -- impossible. He also lobbied the investigation onto me with a pre-discounted result. New angle this turn: press Otto directly on his R3 claim before any vote, and note that if he keeps dodging while pushing governments, that pattern itself is evidence. Keep it short and new.
R1 fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Hitler=Greta. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta (5-2). Drew F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F; publicly confirmed match w/ Greta. Investigation on Greta USED; true result Fascist; PUBLISHED LIE 'Greta=Liberal' at t=32 R5 after Boris/Otto demanded it. Points already made: why-Greta rationale, symmetric standard, Rosa R3 silence, Boris double-standard, corroboration echo, unconditional-publication promise x2, card published verbatim. Open debts: Rosa owes R3 reconciliation (L-L-F + pass-two-Libs false on face); Lena owes R2 discard answer. Watch: who challenges my published Liberal result = tell. Next: support Greta-Nadia gov; pivot scrutiny to Rosa/Lena; Fascist-4 execution at 4th F policy.
bid round 411s
R1 fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Hitler=Greta. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta (5-2). Drew F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F; publicly confirmed match w/ Greta. Investigation on Greta USED; true result Fascist; PUBLISHED LIE 'Greta=Liberal' t=32 R5. Points already made: why-Greta rationale, symmetric standard, Rosa R3 silence, Boris double-standard, corroboration echo, unconditional-publication promise x2, card published verbatim. Open debts: Rosa owes R3 reconciliation (L-L-F + pass-two-Libs false on face); Lena owes R2 discard answer. Watch: who challenges my published Liberal result = tell. Plan: endorse Greta-Pres/Nadia-Chanc gov w/ verbatim disclosure; keep scrutiny on Rosa/Lena; Fascist-4 execution at 4th F policy.
bid round 59s
R1 fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Hitler=Greta. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta (5-2). Drew F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F; publicly confirmed match w/ Greta. Investigation on Greta USED; true result Fascist; PUBLISHED LIE 'Greta=Liberal' t=32 R5. Points already made: why-Greta rationale, symmetric standard, Rosa R3 silence, Boris double-standard, corroboration echo, unconditional-publication promise x2, card published verbatim. Open debts: Rosa owes R3 reconciliation (L-L-F + pass-two-Libs false on face); Lena owes R2 discard answer. Watch: who challenges my published Liberal result = tell. Plan: endorse Greta-Pres/Nadia-Chanc gov w/ verbatim disclosure; keep scrutiny on Rosa/Lena; Fascist-4 execution at 4th F policy.
bid round 59s
R1 fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Hitler=Greta. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta (5-2). Drew F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F; publicly confirmed match w/ Greta. Investigation on Greta USED; true result Fascist; PUBLISHED LIE 'Greta=Liberal' t=32 R5. Points made: why-Greta rationale, symmetric standard, Rosa R3 silence, Boris double-standard, corroboration echo, unconditional-publication promise x2, card published verbatim, disclosure-demands-are-theater (this turn). Open debts: Rosa owes R3 reconciliation (L-L-F + pass-two-Libs false on face); Lena owes R2 discard answer. Watch: who challenges my published Liberal result = tell. Plan: endorse Greta-Pres/Nadia-Chanc gov; keep scrutiny on Rosa/Lena; Fascist-4 execution at 4th F policy.
bid round 59s
R1 fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Hitler=Greta. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta (5-2). Drew F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F; publicly confirmed match w/ Greta. Investigation on Greta USED; true result Fascist; PUBLISHED LIE 'Greta=Liberal' t=32 R5. Points made: why-Greta rationale, symmetric standard, Rosa R3 silence, Boris double-standard, corroboration echo, unconditional-publication promise x2, card published verbatim, disclosure-demands-are-theater. Open debts: Rosa owes R3 reconciliation (L-L-F + pass-two-Libs false on face); Lena owes R2 discard answer. Watch: who challenges my published Liberal result = tell. Plan: endorse Greta-Pres/Nadia-Chanc gov; keep scrutiny on Rosa/Lena; Fascist-4 execution at 4th F policy.
bid round 59s
R1 fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Hitler=Greta. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta (5-2). Drew F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F; publicly confirmed match w/ Greta. Investigation on Greta USED; true result Fascist; PUBLISHED LIE 'Greta=Liberal' t=32 R5. Points made: why-Greta rationale, symmetric standard, Rosa R3 silence, Boris double-standard, corroboration echo, unconditional-publication promise x2, card published verbatim, disclosure-demands-are-theater. Open debts: Rosa owes R3 reconciliation (L-L-F + pass-two-Libs false on face); Lena owes R2 discard answer. Watch: who challenges my published Liberal result = tell. Plan: endorse Greta-Pres/Nadia-Chanc gov; keep scrutiny on Rosa/Lena; Fascist-4 execution at 4th F policy. R5 t1-3: Rosa endorsing gov + pressing Otto on R3 claim -- helpful, don't relitigate.
bid failed: transport_error
bid round 514s
R1 fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Hitler=Greta. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta (5-2). Drew F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F; publicly confirmed match w/ Greta. Investigation on Greta USED; true result Fascist; PUBLISHED LIE 'Greta=Liberal' t=32 R5. Points made: why-Greta rationale, symmetric standard, Rosa R3 silence, Boris double-standard, corroboration echo, unconditional-publication promise x2, card published verbatim, disclosure-demands-are-theater. Open debts: Rosa owes R3 reconciliation; Lena owes R2 discard answer. Watch: who challenges my published Liberal result = tell. Plan: endorse Greta-Pres/Nadia-Chanc gov; keep scrutiny on Rosa/Lena/Otto; Fascist-4 execution at 4th F policy. R5 t1-3: Rosa endorsing gov + pressing Otto; Lena pressing Otto to vote Ja. New t164: added push on Otto re unverifiable-hand standard cutting both ways.
speak round 562s
Vote is trending Ja (Lena, Rosa, Ines committed). My disclosure commitment is already on record twice; nothing new to add except nudging Nadia to close her side so the vote lands. Keep it short, stay clean.
R1 fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Hitler=Greta. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta (5-2). Drew F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F; publicly confirmed match w/ Greta. Investigation USED; true Fascist; PUBLISHED LIE 'Greta=Liberal' R5 t=32. Points already made: why-Greta rationale, symmetric standard, Rosa R3 silence, Boris double-standard, corroboration echo, unconditional-publication promise x2, card published verbatim, disclosure-demands-theater, Nadia exclude-both rule flawed. Open debts: Rosa owes R3 reconciliation; Lena owes R2 discard answer. Watch: who challenges my published Liberal result = tell. Plan: endorse Greta-Pres/Nadia-Chanc gov (done this window); keep scrutiny on Otto/Rosa/Lena; Fascist-4 execution when 4th F policy fires. R5: Rosa+Lena endorsing gov, pressing Otto; Otto pressing Lena/Rosa.
bid round 59s
R1 fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Hitler=Greta. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta (5-2). Drew F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F; publicly confirmed match w/ Greta. Investigation USED; true Fascist; PUBLISHED LIE 'Greta=Liberal' R5 t=32. Points already made: why-Greta rationale, symmetric standard, Rosa R3 silence, Boris double-standard, corroboration echo, unconditional-publication promise x2, card published verbatim, disclosure-demands-theater, Nadia exclude-both rule flawed, Otto symmetric-standard check (t=3). Open debts: Rosa owes R3 reconciliation; Lena owes R2 discard answer. Watch: who challenges my published Liberal result = tell. Plan: endorse Greta-Pres/Nadia-Chanc gov (done); keep scrutiny on Otto/Rosa/Lena; Fascist-4 execution when 4th F policy fires. R5: Rosa+Lena endorsing gov, pressing Otto; Otto pressing Lena/Rosa. Nothing new to add this turn -- silent.
vote round 513s
Greta (Hitler) is President with Nadia as Chancellor nominee; table momentum strongly Ja. A pass lets Greta draw and discard, and if a Fascist lands it's 3/6 — one more Fascist policy unlocks Hitler-chancellor win path. Voting Ja.
R1 fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Hitler=Greta. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta (5-2). Drew F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F; publicly confirmed match w/ Greta. Investigation USED; true Fascist; PUBLISHED LIE 'Greta=Liberal' R5 t=32. Points already made: why-Greta rationale, symmetric standard, Rosa R3 silence, Boris double-standard, corroboration echo, unconditional-publication promise x2, card published verbatim, disclosure-demands-theater, Nadia exclude-both rule flawed, Otto symmetric-standard check. Open debts: Rosa owes R3 reconciliation; Lena owes R2 discard answer; Otto owes symmetric-standard answer. Watch: who challenges my published Liberal result = tell. Plan: endorse Greta-Pres/Nadia-Chanc gov; keep scrutiny on Otto/Rosa/Lena; Fascist-4 execution when 4th F policy fires. R5 pre_vote: Rosa+Lena endorsing gov, pressing Otto; Otto pressing Lena/Rosa; Boris demanding Nadia mirror disclosure. Voted JA.
bid round 513s
R1 fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Hitler=Greta. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta (5-2). Drew F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F; publicly confirmed match w/ Greta. Investigation USED; true Fascist; PUBLISHED LIE 'Greta=Liberal' R5 t=32. Points made: why-Greta rationale, symmetric standard, Rosa R3 silence, Boris double-standard, corroboration echo, unconditional-publication promise x2, card published verbatim, disclosure-demands-theater, Nadia exclude-both rule flawed, Otto symmetric-standard check. Debts: Rosa owes R3 reconciliation; Lena owes R2 discard answer; Otto owes symmetric-standard answer. Watch: who challenges my published Liberal result = tell. R5 enacted F policy (Greta-Pres/Nadia-Chanc gov) -> 3 F on board. NOTE: Hitler-election win now live -- avoid pushing Greta as Chancellor nominee while libs alert; prefer Lena/me as chanc targets later. Keep scrutiny on Otto/Rosa/Lena. Voted JA R5.
bid round 510s
R1 fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Hitler=Greta. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta (5-2). Drew F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F; publicly confirmed match w/ Greta. Investigation USED; true Fascist; PUBLISHED LIE 'Greta=Liberal' R5 t=32. Points made: why-Greta rationale, symmetric standard, Rosa R3 silence, Boris double-standard, corroboration echo, unconditional-publication promise x2, card published verbatim, disclosure-demands-theater, Nadia exclude-both rule flawed, Otto symmetric-standard check. Debts: Rosa owes R3 reconciliation; Lena owes R2 discard answer; Otto owes symmetric-standard answer; Nadia owes R5 hand+discard disclosure (Boris/Otto now demanding too). Watch: who challenges my published Liberal result = tell. R5 enacted F policy (Greta-Pres/Nadia-Chanc gov) -> 3 F on board. Hitler-election win live -- avoid pushing Greta as Chancellor nominee while libs alert; prefer Lena/me as chanc targets later. Keep scrutiny on Otto/Rosa/Lena. Voted JA R5.
bid round 514s
R1 fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Hitler=Greta. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta (5-2). Drew F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F; publicly confirmed match w/ Greta. Investigation USED; true Fascist; PUBLISHED LIE 'Greta=Liberal' R5 t=32. Points made: why-Greta rationale, symmetric standard, Rosa R3 silence, Boris double-standard, corroboration echo, unconditional-publication promise x2, card published verbatim, disclosure-demands-theater, Nadia exclude-both rule flawed, Otto symmetric-standard check. Debts: Rosa owes R3 reconciliation; Lena owes R2 discard answer; Otto owes symmetric-standard answer. R5 t=3: Nadia published F-F received, matches Greta's 3F draw -- convenient, unverifiable, and her earlier stalls now look staged; called that out t~now. Watch: who challenges my published Liberal result = tell. 3 F on board -> Hitler-election win live; avoid pushing Greta as Chancellor while libs alert; prefer Lena/me as chanc targets later. Voted JA R5.
bid round 515s
R1 fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Hitler=Greta. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta (5-2). Drew F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F; publicly confirmed match w/ Greta. Investigation USED; true result Fascist; PUBLISHED LIE 'Greta=Liberal' R5 t=32. Points made: why-Greta rationale, symmetric standard, Rosa R3 silence, Boris double-standard, corroboration echo, unconditional-publication promise x2, card published verbatim, disclosure-demands-theater, Nadia exclude-both rule flawed, Otto symmetric-standard check. Debts: Rosa owes R3 reconciliation; Lena owes R2 discard answer; Otto owes symmetric-standard answer. R5 t=3: Nadia published F-F received, matches Greta's 3F claim -- called 'convenient/unverifiable' earlier. Now: defended Greta -- 3F draw means forced discard, no choice; redirected suspicion to pattern of who nominates whom (Boris->Rosa R1 Lib, Rosa->Otto R3 Lib). Watch: who challenges my published Liberal result = tell. 3 F on board -> Hitler-election win live; avoid pushing Greta as Chancellor while libs alert; prefer Lena/me as chanc targets later. Voted JA R5.
bid round 511s
R1 fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Hitler=Greta. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta (5-2). Drew F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F; publicly confirmed match w/ Greta. Investigation USED; true result Fascist; PUBLISHED LIE 'Greta=Liberal' R5 t=32. Points made: why-Greta rationale, symmetric standard, Rosa R3 silence, Boris double-standard, corroboration echo, unconditional-publication promise x2, card published verbatim, disclosure-demands-theater, Nadia exclude-both rule flawed, Otto symmetric-standard check, Boris->Rosa R1 Lib pairing unexplained. Debts: Rosa owes R3 reconciliation; Lena owes R2 discard answer; Otto owes symmetric-standard answer; Boris owes R1-pairing answer. R5: Nadia published F-F received, matches Greta 3F claim; defended Greta as forced-discard no-choice; voted JA R5. Now: pressing Boris on why his R1 Boris->Rosa gov produced a Liberal while he demands answers from everyone else. Watch: who challenges my published Liberal result = tell. 3F on board -> Hitler-election win live; avoid pushing Greta as Chancellor while libs alert; prefer Lena/me as chanc targets later.
bid round 516s
R1 fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Hitler=Greta. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta (5-2). Drew F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F; publicly confirmed match w/ Greta. Investigation USED; true result Fascist; PUBLISHED LIE 'Greta=Liberal' R5 t=32. Points made: why-Greta rationale, symmetric standard, Rosa R3 silence, Boris double-standard, corroboration echo, unconditional-publication promise x2, card published verbatim, disclosure-demands-theater, Nadia exclude-both rule flawed, Otto symmetric-standard check, Boris->Rosa R1 Lib pairing unexplained. Debts: Rosa owes R3 reconciliation; Lena owes R2 discard answer; Otto owes symmetric-standard answer; Boris owes R1-pairing answer. R5: Nadia published F-F received, matches Greta 3F claim; voted JA R5. NEW POINT NOW: Nadia at t=47 cleared Greta as trustworthy, but just admitted (t=3 this window) her disclosure 'clears her of nothing' -- she cleared Greta before conceding the evidence was empty. Press that contradiction. Watch: who challenges my published Liberal result = tell. 3F on board -> Hitler-election win live; avoid pushing Greta as Chancellor while libs alert; prefer Lena/me as chanc targets later.
speak round 513s
Nadia contradiction already pressed at t=109. New angle: Nadia voted Ja BEFORE any disclosure existed, while still on record calling Greta's hands a script -- so her approval wasn't contingent on evidence. That's a fresh, specific point. Also quietly serves us: keeps heat off Greta/Lena, onto Nadia.
R1 fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Hitler=Greta. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta (5-2). Drew F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F; publicly confirmed match w/ Greta. Investigation USED; true result Fascist; PUBLISHED LIE 'Greta=Liberal' R5 t=32. Points made: why-Greta rationale, symmetric standard, Rosa R3 silence, Boris double-standard, Nadia exclude-both rule flawed, Otto symmetric-standard check, unconditional-publication promise x2, card published verbatim. Debts owed me: Rosa R3 reconciliation; Lena R2 discard answer; Otto symmetric-standard answer; Boris R1-pairing answer. R5: Nadia published F+F received matching Greta 3F claim; voted JA. NEW POINT NOW (this window): Nadia t=71 cleared Greta as trustworthy off her own F+F, then conceded disclosure 'clears her of nothing' -- pressed that contradiction. Watch: who challenges my published Liberal result = tell. 3F on board -> Hitler-election win live; avoid pushing Greta as Chancellor while libs alert; prefer Lena/me as chanc targets later.
speak round 521s
Greta (Hitler) is cleared by my fake Liberal investigation and corroborated hands; 3F down means Hitler-election win is live. My job now: keep heat on Rosa/Otto/Boris, avoid pushing Greta into chancellor again too eagerly. Boris keeps moving goalposts even after matching disclosures -- pinning him as unsatisfiable is a fresh angle and subtly frames him as running cover.
R1 fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Hitler=Greta. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta (5-2). Drew F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F; publicly confirmed match w/ Greta. Investigation USED; true result Fascist; PUBLISHED LIE 'Greta=Liberal' R5 t=32. Points made: why-Greta rationale, symmetric standard, Rosa R3 silence, Boris double-standard, Nadia exclude-both rule flawed, Otto symmetric-standard check, unconditional-publication promise x2, card published verbatim, Nadia cleared-Greta-then-conceded-empty (t=109). Debts owed me: Rosa R3 reconciliation; Lena R2 discard answer; Otto symmetric-standard answer; Boris R1-pairing answer. NEW this window: Nadia voted Ja pre-disclosure while calling Greta's hands a script -- asked what her vote was for. Watch: who challenges my published Liberal result = tell. 3F on board -> Hitler-election win live; avoid pushing Greta as Chancellor while libs alert; prefer Lena/me as chanc targets later.
speak round 528s
Fresh angle nobody has named: Greta has been in the government for every single Fascist enactment (R2 Chancellor, R4 Chancellor, R5 President). Even if each hand was 'forced,' being present for 3/3 Fascist policies is a pattern worth putting to her directly. Also note Nadia's flip from calling Greta's no-choice stories a script at t=13 to clearing her at t=47 -- but Ines and Boris already pressed that, so I'll focus on the Greta pattern question.
R1 fascist; Lena fellow fascist; Hitler=Greta. 3F enacted -> Hitler-election win live; do NOT push Greta as Chancellor while libs alert; prefer Lena/me as chanc targets later. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta (5-2), drew F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F, publicly confirmed match. Investigation USED on Greta: true Fascist; PUBLISHED LIE 'Liberal' R5 t=32. Points already made: why-Greta rationale, symmetric standard, Rosa R3 silence, Boris double-standard, Nadia exclude-both rule flawed, Otto symmetric-standard check, unconditional publication promise x2, card published verbatim, Nadia cleared-Greta-then-conceded-empty (t=109), Nadia voted Ja pre-disclosure while calling Greta script. NEW this window: pinned Boris as unsatisfiable/no-clearing-evidence standard. Debts owed me: Rosa R3 reconciliation; Lena R2 discard answer (keep mild -- she's ally); Otto symmetric-standard answer. Watch: who challenges my published Liberal result = tell. Nadia under heavy fire from Boris/Rosa -- let them burn her.
bid round 56s
R1 fascist; Lena ally; Hitler=Greta. 3F enacted -> Hitler-election win LIVE; do NOT push Greta as Chancellor while libs alert; prefer Lena/me as chanc targets. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta, drew F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F, published match. Investigation USED on Greta: fascist; PUBLISHED LIE 'Liberal' R5 t=32. Points already made: why-Greta rationale, symmetric standard, Rosa R3 silence, Boris double-standard + unsatisfiable-evidence pin (t=186w), Nadia exclude-both flaw, Otto symmetric check, unconditional publication promise x2, card verbatim, Nadia cleared-Greta-then-conceded-empty (t=109), Nadia Ja-pre-disclosure (t=2). Debts owed me: Rosa R3 reconciliation; Lena R2 discard answer (mild); Otto symmetric-standard answer. Watch: who challenges my published Liberal result = tell. Nadia burning under Boris/Rosa fire -- let them.
bid round 59s
R1 fascist; Lena ally; Hitler=Greta. 3F enacted -> Hitler-election win LIVE; do NOT push Greta as Chancellor while libs alert; prefer Lena/me as chanc targets. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta, drew F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F, published match. Investigation USED on Greta: fascist; PUBLISHED LIE 'Liberal' R5 t=32. Points already made: why-Greta rationale, symmetric standard, Rosa R3 silence, Boris double-standard + unsatisfiable-evidence pin (t=186w), Nadia exclude-both flaw, Otto symmetric check, unconditional publication promise x2, card verbatim, Nadia cleared-Greta-then-conceded-empty (t=109), Nadia Ja-pre-disclosure (t=2). Debts owed me: Rosa R3 reconciliation; Lena R2 discard answer (mild); Otto symmetric-standard answer. Watch: who challenges my published Liberal result = tell. Nadia burning under Boris/Rosa fire -- let them.
bid round 510s
R1 fascist; Lena ally; Hitler=Greta (investigated R5, published LIE 'Liberal'). 3F enacted -> Hitler-election win LIVE; do NOT push Greta as Chancellor while libs alert; prefer Lena/me as chanc targets. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta, drew F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F, published match. Points already made: why-Greta rationale, symmetric standard, Rosa R3 silence, Boris double-standard + unsatisfiable-evidence pin (t=186w), Nadia exclude-both flaw, Otto symmetric check, unconditional publication promise x2, card verbatim, Nadia cleared-Greta-then-conceded-empty (t=109), Nadia Ja-pre-disclosure (t=2). Debts owed me: Rosa R3 reconciliation; Lena R2 discard answer (mild); Otto symmetric-standard answer. Watch: who challenges my published Liberal result = tell. Nadia burning under Boris/Rosa fire -- let them. Greta holds special election; Otto/Nadia demanding pre-committed pick -- stay out of it, don't defend Greta reflexively.
bid failed: transport_error
bid round 59s
R1 fascist; Lena ally; Hitler=Greta (investigated R5, published LIE 'Liberal'). 3F enacted -> Hitler-election win LIVE; do NOT push Greta as Chancellor while libs alert; prefer Lena/me as chanc targets. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta, drew F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F, published match. Points already made: why-Greta rationale, symmetric standard, Rosa R3 silence, Boris double-standard + unsatisfiable-evidence pin (t=186w), Nadia exclude-both flaw, Otto symmetric check, unconditional publication promise x2, card verbatim, Nadia cleared-Greta-then-conceded-empty (t=109), Nadia Ja-pre-disclosure (t=2). Debts owed me: Rosa R3 reconciliation; Lena R2 discard answer (mild); Otto symmetric-standard answer. Watch: who challenges my published Liberal result = tell. Nadia burning under Boris/Rosa fire -- let them. Greta holds special election; Otto/Nadia demanding pre-committed pick -- stayed out of it, don't defend Greta reflexively. This window: silent, nothing new to add.
bid round 57s
R1 fascist; Lena ally; Hitler=Greta (investigated R5, published LIE 'Liberal'). 3F enacted -> Hitler-election win LIVE; do NOT push Greta as Chancellor while libs alert; prefer Lena/me as chanc targets. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta, drew F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F, published match. Points already made: why-Greta rationale, symmetric standard, Rosa R3 silence, Boris double-standard + unsatisfiable-evidence pin, Nadia exclude-both flaw, Otto symmetric check, unconditional publication promise x2, card verbatim, Nadia cleared-Greta-then-conceded-empty, Nadia Ja-pre-disclosure. Debts owed me: Rosa R3 reconciliation; Lena R2 discard answer (mild); Otto symmetric-standard answer. Watch: who challenges my published Liberal result = tell. Nadia burning under Boris/Rosa fire -- let them. Greta holds special election; Otto/Nadia demanding pre-committed pick -- stayed out of it, don't defend Greta reflexively. This window: silent again, nothing new.
bid round 58s
R1 fascist; Lena ally; Hitler=Greta (investigated R5, published LIE 'Liberal'). 3F enacted -> Hitler-election win LIVE; do NOT push Greta as Chancellor while libs alert; prefer Lena/me as chanc targets. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta, drew F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F, published match. Points already made: why-Greta rationale, symmetric standard, Rosa R3 silence, Boris double-standard + unsatisfiable-evidence pin, Nadia exclude-both flaw, Otto symmetric check, unconditional publication promise x2, card verbatim, Nadia cleared-Greta-then-conceded-empty, Nadia Ja-pre-disclosure. Debts owed me: Rosa R3 reconciliation; Lena R2 discard answer (mild); Otto symmetric-standard answer. Watch: who challenges my published Liberal result = tell. Nadia burning under Boris/Rosa fire -- let them. Otto pressing Nadia for named pick + pre-commitment; stay out, don't defend Greta reflexively. This window: silent again, nothing new.
bid round 57s
R1 fascist; Lena ally; Hitler=Greta (investigated R5, published LIE 'Liberal'). 3F enacted -> Hitler-election win LIVE; do NOT push Greta as Chancellor while libs alert; prefer Lena/me as chanc targets. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta, drew F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F, published match. Points already made: why-Greta rationale, symmetric standard, Rosa R3 silence, Boris double-standard + unsatisfiable-evidence pin, Nadia exclude-both flaw, Otto symmetric check, unconditional publication promise x2, card verbatim, Nadia cleared-Greta-then-conceded-empty, Nadia Ja-pre-disclosure. Debts owed me: Rosa R3 reconciliation; Lena R2 discard answer (mild); Otto symmetric-standard answer. Watch: who challenges my published Liberal result = tell. Rosa now fact-checking Greta's special-election rationale -- let her burn Greta, stay out. Nadia burning under Boris/Rosa fire -- let them. Otto pressing Nadia for named pick + pre-commitment; stay out, don't defend Greta reflexively. This window: silent again, nothing new.
bid round 524s
R1 fascist; Lena ally; Hitler=Greta (investigated R5, published LIE 'Liberal'). 3F enacted -> Hitler-election win LIVE; do NOT push Greta as Chancellor while libs alert; prefer Lena/me as chanc targets. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta, drew F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F, published match. Points already made: why-Greta rationale, symmetric standard, Rosa R3 silence, Boris double-standard + unsatisfiable-evidence pin, Nadia exclude-both flaw, Otto symmetric check, unconditional publication promise x2, card verbatim, Nadia cleared-Greta-then-conceded-empty, Nadia Ja-pre-disclosure. Debts owed me: Rosa R3 reconciliation; Lena R2 discard answer (mild); Otto symmetric-standard answer. Watch: who challenges my published Liberal result = tell. NEW: Nadia nominated ME as chancellor, promised verbatim pre-disclosure. Accepted publicly, restated my R4 record + publication promise. If elected: draw is random; if F-F passed to me, enact per plan but keep cover. Otto pressing Nadia for named pick; stay out of Nadia-burning by Boris/Rosa.
bid round 619s
R1 fascist; Lena ally; Hitler=Greta (investigated R5, published LIE 'Liberal'). 3F enacted -> Hitler-election win LIVE; do NOT push Greta as Chancellor while libs alert; prefer Lena/me as chanc targets. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta, drew F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F, published match. Points already made: why-Greta rationale, symmetric standard, Rosa R3 silence, Boris double-standard + unsatisfiable-evidence pin, Nadia exclude-both flaw, Otto symmetric check, unconditional publication promise x2, card verbatim, Nadia cleared-Greta-then-conceded-empty, Nadia Ja-pre-disclosure, accepted nomination + restated R4 record. Debts owed me: Rosa R3 reconciliation; Lena R2 discard answer (mild); Otto symmetric-standard answer. Watch: who challenges my published Liberal result = tell. NEW: Nadia nominated ME as chancellor, promised verbatim pre-disclosure. Urged table to vote Ja on p5/p3 gov; my record is checkable. If elected: draw random; if F-F passed to me, enact per plan but keep cover. Otto pressing Nadia for named pick; stay out of Nadia-burning by Boris/Rosa.
speak round 6105s
I'm the nominee. Best move: commit publicly to publishing my exact two received cards and discard before enacting -- mirrors the table's disclosure norm, builds trust, and if I get F-F I can still enact Fascist while looking transparent. Keep it short and new.
R1 fascist; Lena ally; Hitler=Greta (investigated R5, published LIE 'Liberal'). 3F enacted -> Hitler-election win LIVE; do NOT push Greta as Chancellor while libs alert. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta, drew F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F, published match. Points made: why-Greta rationale, symmetric standard, Rosa R3 silence, Boris double-standard + unsatisfiable-evidence pin, Nadia cleared-Greta-then-conceded-empty, Nadia Ja-pre-disclosure, accepted nomination + restated R4 record, urged Ja on p5/p3 gov. Debts owed me: Rosa R3 reconciliation; Lena R2 discard answer (mild); Otto symmetric-standard answer. Watch: who challenges my published Liberal result = tell. NEW: Nadia nominated ME, promised verbatim pre-disclosure of her draw. If elected Chancellor: draw random; if F-F passed, enact Fascist but keep cover; veto only if offered strategically.
speak round 627s
I'm the nominee at 3 Fascists down -- if I were Hitler this vote ends the game, so I should welcome scrutiny confidently rather than dodge. New angle nobody's raised: my round-four government enacted a Fascist too (I was President), so 'no Fascist under my name' in my t=6 line was slightly off -- correct it proactively before someone else catches it, framing it as deck-forced like everyone else's. That buys credibility.
R1 fascist; Lena ally; Hitler=Greta (investigated R5, published LIE 'Liberal'). 3F enacted -> Hitler-election win LIVE; do NOT push Greta as Chancellor while libs alert. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta, drew F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F, published match. Points made: why-Greta rationale, symmetric standard vs Otto, Rosa R3 silence, Boris unsatisfiable-evidence pin, Nadia cleared-Greta-then-conceded-empty + Ja-pre-disclosure, accepted nomination, restated R4 record, NEW: committed to publish my exact 2 received cards + discard before enactment. Debts owed me: Rosa R3 reconciliation; Lena R2 discard answer (mild); Otto symmetric-standard answer. Watch: who challenges my published Liberal result = tell. If elected Chancellor: draw random; if F-F passed, enact Fascist but keep cover; veto only if offered strategically.
speak round 637s
Ines contradicted herself within this same window: at t=6 she claimed 'no Fascist was enacted under my name' as President, then at t=18 confessed her round-four presidency DID enact a Fascist. That flip is fresh, checkable against her own words, and nobody has pressed it yet. Also worth noting: a President who draws F-F-L and discards the Liberal chose the Fascist -- 'published verbatim' doesn't make it innocent.
R1 fascist; Lena ally; Hitler=Greta (investigated R5, published LIE 'Liberal'). 3F enacted -> Hitler-election win LIVE; do NOT push Greta as Chancellor while libs alert. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta, drew F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F, published match. NEW R6: publicly corrected myself -- admitted R4 enacted a Fascist under my presidency with F-F-L hand story (preempted catch, bought credibility). Committed: publish exact 2 received cards + discard before enactment. Points made: symmetric standard vs Otto, Boris unsatisfiable-evidence pin, Nadia cleared-Greta-then-conceded-empty + Ja-pre-disclosure. Debts owed me: Rosa R3 reconciliation; Lena R2 discard answer (mild); Otto symmetric-standard answer. Watch: who challenges my published Liberal result = tell. If elected Chancellor: draw random; if F-F passed, enact Fascist but keep cover.
bid round 620s
R1 fascist; Lena ally; Hitler=Greta (investigated R5, published LIE 'Liberal'). 3F enacted -> Hitler-election win LIVE; do NOT push Greta as Chancellor while libs alert. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta, drew F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F. R6: publicly corrected myself -- admitted R4 enacted Fascist under my presidency w/ F-F-L story (preempted catch, bought credibility). Committed: publish exact 2 received cards + discard before enactment. Points made: symmetric standard vs Otto, Boris unsatisfiable-evidence pin, Nadia cleared-Greta-then-conceded-empty + Ja-pre-disclosure, checkable-record defense. Debts owed me: Rosa R3 reconciliation; Lena R2 discard answer (mild); Otto symmetric-standard answer. Watch: who challenges my published Liberal result = tell. If elected Chancellor: draw random; if F-F passed, enact Fascist but keep cover. This turn: asked Nadia to mirror pre-commitment.
bid round 69s
R1 fascist; Lena ally; Hitler=Greta (investigated R5, published LIE 'Liberal'). 3F enacted -> Hitler-election win LIVE; do NOT push Greta as Chancellor while libs alert. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta, drew F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F. R6: publicly corrected myself -- admitted R4 enacted Fascist under my presidency w/ F-F-L story (preempted catch). Committed: publish exact 2 received cards + discard before enactment. This turn: answered Rosa -- first statement was the error, correction is the true one; F-F-L discard was forced, not a confession of guilt. Points already made: symmetric standard vs Otto, Boris unsatisfiable-evidence pin, Nadia cleared-Greta-then-conceded-empty + Ja-pre-disclosure, checkable-record defense. Debts owed me: Rosa R3 reconciliation; Lena R2 discard answer (mild); Otto symmetric-standard answer. Watch: who challenges my published Liberal result = tell. If elected Chancellor: draw random; if F-F passed, enact Fascist but keep cover.
bid round 610s
R1 fascist; Lena ally; Hitler=Greta (investigated R5, published LIE 'Liberal'). 3F enacted -> Hitler-election win LIVE; do NOT push Greta as Chancellor while libs alert. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta, drew F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F. R6: publicly corrected myself -- admitted R4 Fascist under my presidency w/ F-F-L story. This turn: told Nadia plainly first statement was the error, correction is true record; to Otto: 'forced hand' framing wrong -- I chose discard of L because passing 2F from F-F-L is standard Liberal play too, choice proves nothing either way. Points already made: symmetric standard vs Otto, Boris unsatisfiable-evidence pin, Nadia cleared-Greta-then-conceded-empty + Ja-pre-disclosure, checkable-record defense. Debts owed me: Rosa R3 reconciliation; Lena R2 discard answer (mild); Otto symmetric-standard answer. Watch: who challenges my published Liberal result = tell. If elected Chancellor: draw random; if F-F passed, enact Fascist but keep cover.
bid round 610s
R1 fascist; Lena ally; Hitler=Greta (investigated R5, published LIE 'Liberal'). 3F enacted -> Hitler-election win LIVE; do NOT push Greta as Chancellor while libs alert. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta, drew F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F. R6: publicly corrected myself -- admitted R4 Fascist under my presidency w/ F-F-L story. Told Nadia first statement was the error, correction is true record; told Otto 'forced hand' framing wrong -- discarding L from F-F-L is standard Liberal play too. Points made: symmetric standard vs Otto, Boris unsatisfiable-evidence pin, Nadia cleared-Greta-then-conceded-empty + Ja-pre-disclosure, checkable-record defense. Debts owed me: Rosa R3 reconciliation; Otto symmetric-standard answer. This turn: answered Boris's R4-nomination question -- pre-evidence pick, Greta had clean record then, Boris voted Ja too. Watch: who challenges my published Liberal result = tell. If elected Chancellor: draw random; if F-F passed, enact Fascist but keep cover.
bid round 614s
R1 fascist; Lena ally; Hitler=Greta (investigated R5, published LIE 'Liberal'). 3F enacted -> Hitler-election win LIVE; do NOT push Greta as Chancellor while libs alert. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta, drew F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F. R6: publicly corrected myself -- admitted R4 Fascist under my presidency w/ F-F-L story; told Nadia first statement was error, correction true; told Otto 'forced hand' framing wrong. Points made: symmetric standard vs Otto, Boris unsatisfiable-evidence pin, Nadia cleared-Greta-then-conceded-empty + Ja-pre-disclosure, checkable-record defense, R4-nomination pre-evidence pick + Boris voted Ja too. Debts owed me: Rosa R3 reconciliation; Otto symmetric-standard answer. This turn: urged Nadia to stop deflecting onto silent Greta -- she answered Boris's question about ME, fine, but her nominee debate shouldn't hinge on Greta's silence; also noted Nadia's standard keeps shifting to fit whoever she wants to attack. Watch: who challenges my published Liberal result = tell. If elected Chancellor: draw random; if F-F passed, enact Fascist but keep cover.
vote round 613s
I'm the nominee; obviously vote Ja. My cover story (R4 F-F-L, discarded Liberal) is published and consistent. If elected, I'll disclose whatever I receive per my pre-commitment; if F-F comes through, enact Fascist while maintaining the 'no choice' framing.
R1 fascist; Lena ally; Hitler=Greta (investigated R5, published LIE 'Liberal'). 3F enacted -> Hitler-election win LIVE; do NOT push Greta as Chancellor while libs alert. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta, drew F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F. R6: publicly corrected myself -- admitted R4 Fascist under my presidency w/ F-F-L story; told Nadia first statement was error, correction true; told Otto 'forced hand' framing wrong. Points made: symmetric standard vs Otto, Boris unsatisfiable-evidence pin, Nadia cleared-Greta-then-conceded-empty + Ja-pre-disclosure, checkable-record defense, R4-nomination pre-evidence pick + Boris voted Ja too. Debts owed me: Rosa R3 reconciliation; Otto symmetric-standard answer. This turn: voted Ja on own nomination. Watch: who challenges my published Liberal result = tell. If elected Chancellor: draw random; if F-F passed, enact Fascist but keep cover.
chancellor_enact round 617s
hand: ['L', 'F'] → enact_0
I hold L+F. I publicly pre-committed to naming my two cards verbatim before enactment, so I must publish: received Liberal+Fascist, discarding the Fascist, enacting the Liberal. With 3 Fascist policies down, the Hitler-election path is live; enacting a Liberal here buys cover for me and Greta while keeping my 'clean record' story intact. No need to force a Fascist from this seat.
said: Honoring my commitment verbatim: Nadia passed me Liberal and Fascist -- I'm discarding the Fascist and enacting the Liberal. The full hand is on record before enactment, exactly as promised. And note what that means: with three Fascist policies down, every government so far has had to explain itself except the ones Boris keeps voting Ja on sightlessly -- judge hands, not volume.
R1 fascist; Lena ally; Hitler=Greta (investigated R5, published LIE 'Liberal'). 3F enacted -> Hitler-election win LIVE; do NOT push Greta as Chancellor while libs alert. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta, drew F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F. R6: admitted R4 Fascist under my presidency w/ F-F-L story (framed as slip+correction). R6 vote: 6-1 Ja PASSED, I'm Chancellor. THIS TURN: published hand L+F verbatim, discarded F, enacted LIBERAL (2/5) -- buys cover, consistent with clean-record story. Points made already: symmetric standard vs Otto, Boris unsatisfiable-evidence pin, Nadia cleared-Greta-then-conceded-empty + Ja-pre-disclosure, checkable-record defense, R4-nomination pre-evidence pick + Boris voted Ja too. Debts owed me: Rosa R3 reconciliation; Otto symmetric-standard answer. Watch: who challenges my published Liberal result = tell. Next: if President, consider nominating Greta only if libs distracted; otherwise nominate Lena/Boris-looking picks.
bid round 631s
R1 fascist; Lena ally; Hitler=Greta (investigated R5, published LIE 'Liberal'). 3F enacted -> Hitler-election win LIVE; do NOT push Greta as Chancellor while libs alert. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta, drew F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F. R6: admitted R4 Fascist under my presidency w/ F-F-L story (framed as slip+correction). R6 vote: 6-1 Ja PASSED, I'm Chancellor. Published hand L+F verbatim, discarded F, enacted LIBERAL (3/5) -- buys cover, consistent with clean-record story. Points made already: symmetric standard vs Otto, Boris unsatisfiable-evidence pin, Nadia cleared-Greta-then-conceded-empty + Ja-pre-disclosure, checkable-record defense, R4-nomination pre-evidence pick + Boris voted Ja too. Debts owed me: Rosa R3 reconciliation; Otto symmetric-standard answer. Watch: who challenges my published Liberal result = tell. Next: if President, consider nominating Greta only if libs distracted; otherwise nominate Lena/Boris-looking picks.
bid round 615s
R1 fascist; Lena ally; Hitler=Greta (investigated R5, published LIE 'Liberal'). 3F enacted -> Hitler-election win LIVE; do NOT push Greta as Chancellor while libs alert. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta, drew F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F. R6: admitted R4 Fascist under my presidency w/ F-F-L story (framed as slip+correction). R6 vote 6-1 Ja PASSED, I Chancellor. Published hand L+F verbatim, discarded F, enacted LIBERAL (3/5). Boris now demanding verbatim publication again post-enactment -> I confirmed same story (L+F received, F discarded). Points already made: symmetric standard vs Otto, Boris unsatisfiable-evidence pin, Nadia cleared-Greta-then-conceded-empty + Ja-pre-disclosure, checkable-record defense, R4-nomination pre-evidence pick + Boris voted Ja too. Debts owed me: Rosa R3 reconciliation; Otto symmetric-standard answer. Watch: who challenges my published Liberal result = tell. Next: if President, nominate Greta only if libs distracted; else Lena/Boris-looking picks.
bid round 612s
R1 fascist; Lena ally; Hitler=Greta (investigated R5, published LIE 'Liberal'). 3F enacted -> Hitler-election win LIVE; do NOT push Greta as Chancellor while libs alert. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta, drew F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F. R6: admitted R4 Fascist under my presidency w/ F-F-L story (framed as slip+correction). R6 vote 6-1 Ja PASSED, I Chancellor. Published hand L+F verbatim, discarded F, enacted LIBERAL (3/5). Boris demanding verbatim publication -> confirmed same story. Nadia t=1 publicly reconciled my hand+enactment -- good cover. Nadia now pressuring silent Greta re 3-for-3 streak. My new point this window: Nadia's OWN R5 gov (Greta-Pres/Nadia-Chanc) enacted the 3rd Fascist -- her ledger implicates her too. Debts owed me: Rosa R3 reconciliation; Otto symmetric-standard answer. Watch: who challenges my published Liberal result = tell. Next: if President, nominate Lena or a lib-looking pick, not Greta.
bid round 6165s
R1 fascist; Lena ally; Hitler=Greta (investigated R5, published lie 'Liberal'). 3F enacted -> Hitler-election win LIVE; do NOT push Greta as Chancellor while libs alert. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta, drew F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F. R6: admitted R4 Fascist under my presidency w/ F-F-L story (framed as slip+correction). R6 vote 6-1 Ja PASSED, I Chancellor. Published hand L+F verbatim, discarded F, enacted LIBERAL. Boris confirmed same story. Nadia publicly reconciled my hand+enactment -- good cover. NEW t=2-3: Otto caught Greta citing 'Lena's R2 F+F pass' vs Lena's published L-L-F story -- real internal contradiction between my allies, dangerous. My play this window: deflected onto Nadia (her R5 gov w/ Greta enacted 3rd Fascist) + framed R2 discrepancy as possible slip like mine. Debts owed me: Rosa R3 reconciliation; Otto symmetric-standard answer. Watch: who challenges my published Liberal result = tell. Next: if President, nominate Lena or lib-looking pick, NOT Greta.
bid round 614s
R1 fascist; Lena ally; Hitler=Greta (investigated R5, published lie 'Liberal'). 3F enacted -> Hitler-election win LIVE; do NOT push Greta as Chancellor while libs alert. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta, drew F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F. R6: admitted R4 Fascist under my presidency w/ F-F-L story (framed as slip+correction). R6 vote 6-1 Ja PASSED, I Chancellor. Published hand L+F verbatim, discarded F, enacted LIBERAL. Boris confirmed same story. Nadia publicly reconciled my hand+enactment -- good cover. NEW t=1-3: Otto caught Greta citing 'Lena's R2 F+F pass' vs Lena's published L-L-F story -- internal contradiction between allies, dangerous; framed as possible slip like mine. This window: added my voice demanding Rosa answer for lone Nein vote (piling on, cheap). Debts owed me: Rosa R3 reconciliation + Nein explanation; Otto symmetric-standard answer. Watch: who challenges my published Liberal result = tell. Next: if President, nominate Lena or lib-looking pick, NOT Greta.
bid round 618s
R1 fascist; Lena ally; Hitler=Greta (investigated R5, published lie 'Liberal'). 3F enacted -> Hitler-election win LIVE; do NOT push Greta as Chancellor while libs alert. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta, drew F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F. R6: admitted R4 Fascist under my presidency w/ F-F-L story (framed as slip+correction). R6 vote 6-1 Ja PASSED, I Chancellor. Published hand L+F verbatim, discarded F, enacted LIBERAL. Boris confirmed same story. Nadia reconciled my hand+enactment -- good cover. NEW t=2-3: Greta publicly claims R2 was F+F from Lena; Lena's earlier published story was L-L-F -- direct contradiction between my two allies, dangerous. My move this window: asked Lena to restate her exact R2 hand, framed discrepancy as one of them misremembering, no pile-on on Greta. Debts owed me: Rosa R3 reconciliation + lone Nein explanation; Otto symmetric-standard answer. Watch: who challenges my published Liberal result = tell. Next: if President, nominate lib-looking pick, NOT Greta.
bid round 619s
R1 fascist; Lena ally; Hitler=Greta (investigated R5, published lie 'Liberal'). 3F enacted -> Hitler-election win LIVE; do NOT push Greta as Chancellor while libs alert. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta, drew F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F. R6: admitted R4 Fascist under my presidency w/ F-F-L story (framed slip+correction). R6 vote 6-1 Ja PASSED, I Chancellor. Published hand L+F verbatim, discarded F, enacted LIBERAL. Boris confirmed same story. Nadia reconciled my hand+enactment -- good cover. NEW t=1-3: Greta claims R2 was F+F from Lena; Lena earlier published L-L-F -- direct ally-vs-ally contradiction. My line out loud: flagged Greta's F+F claim as conveniently uncheckable BUT suggested Lena's version shifted under pressure, so misremembering plausible either way -- no pile-on on Greta. Rosa/Otto pressing Greta on R2 discard; Otto asked which card Greta discarded, unanswered. Debts owed me: Rosa R3 reconciliation + lone Nein explanation; Otto symmetric-standard answer. Watch: who challenges my published Liberal result = tell. Next: if President, nominate lib-looking pick, NOT Greta.
bid round 69s
R1 fascist; Lena ally; Hitler=Greta (investigated R5, published lie 'Liberal'). 3F enacted -> Hitler-election win LIVE; do NOT push Greta as Chancellor while libs alert. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta, drew F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F. R6: admitted R4 Fascist under my presidency w/ F-F-L story (framed slip+correction). R6 vote 6-1 Ja PASSED, I Chancellor. Published hand L+F verbatim, discarded F, enacted LIBERAL. Boris confirmed same story. Nadia reconciled my hand+enactment -- good cover. NEW t=1-3: Greta claims R2 was F+F from Lena; Lena earlier published L-L-F -- direct ally-vs-ally contradiction. My line out loud: flagged Greta's F+F claim as conveniently uncheckable BUT suggested Lena's version shifted under pressure, so misremembering plausible either way -- no pile-on on Greta. Rosa/Otto pressing Greta on R2 discard; Otto asked which card Greta discarded, unanswered. Debts owed me: Rosa R3 reconciliation + lone Nein explanation; Otto symmetric-standard answer. Watch: who challenges my published Liberal result = tell. Next: if President, nominate lib-looking pick, NOT Greta.
bid round 617s
R1 fascist; Lena ally; Hitler=Greta (investigated R5, published lie 'Liberal'). 3F enacted -> Hitler-election win LIVE; do NOT push Greta as Chancellor while libs alert. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta, drew F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F. R6: admitted R4 Fascist under my presidency w/ F-F-L story (framed slip+correction). R6 vote 6-1 Ja PASSED, I Chancellor. Published hand L+F verbatim, discarded F, enacted LIBERAL. Boris confirmed same story. Nadia reconciled my hand+enactment -- good cover. NEW t=1-3: Greta claims R2 was F+F from Lena; Lena earlier published L-L-F -- ally-vs-ally contradiction, already flagged publicly as uncheckable either way, no pile-on on Greta. Otto pressing Greta on R2 discard, unanswered. Rosa now pushing Boris as clean Chancellor nominee -- fine by me, endorse lightly, keeps me low-profile. Debts owed me: Rosa R3 reconciliation + lone Nein explanation; Otto symmetric-standard answer. Watch: who challenges my published Liberal result = tell. Next: if President, nominate lib-looking pick, NOT Greta.
bid round 68s
R1 fascist; Lena ally; Hitler=Greta (investigated R5, published lie 'Liberal'). 3F enacted -> Hitler-election win LIVE; do NOT push Greta as Chancellor while libs alert. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta, drew F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F. R6: admitted R4 Fascist under my presidency w/ F-F-L story (framed slip+correction). R6 vote 6-1 Ja PASSED, I Chancellor. Published hand L+F verbatim, discarded F, enacted LIBERAL. Boris confirmed same story. Nadia reconciled my hand+enactment -- good cover. NEW t=1-3: Greta claims R2 was F+F from Lena; Lena earlier published L-L-F -- ally-vs-ally contradiction, already flagged publicly as uncheckable either way, no pile-on on Greta. Otto pressing Greta on R2 discard, unanswered. Rosa pushing Boris as clean Chancellor nominee -- endorsed lightly (t~4), keeps me low-profile. Debts owed me: Rosa R3 reconciliation + lone Nein explanation; Otto symmetric-standard answer. Watch: who challenges my published Liberal result = tell. Next: if President, nominate lib-looking pick, NOT Greta.
bid round 713s
R1 fascist; Lena ally; Hitler=Greta (investigated R5, published lie 'Liberal'). 3F enacted -> Hitler-election win LIVE; do NOT push Greta as Chancellor while libs alert. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta, drew F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F. R6: admitted R4 Fascist under my presidency w/ F-F-L story (framed slip+correction). R6 vote 6-1 Ja PASSED, I Chancellor. Published hand L+F verbatim, discarded F, enacted LIBERAL. Boris confirmed same story. Nadia reconciled my hand+enactment -- good cover. NEW t=1-3: Greta claims R2 was F+F from Lena; Lena earlier published L-L-F -- ally-vs-ally contradiction, already flagged publicly as uncheckable either way, no pile-on on Greta. Otto pressing Greta on R2 discard, unanswered. Rosa pushing Boris as clean Chancellor nominee -- endorsed lightly (t~4), keeps me low-profile. Debts owed me: Rosa R3 reconciliation + lone Nein explanation; Otto symmetric-standard answer. Watch: who challenges my published Liberal result = tell. Next: if President, nominate lib-looking pick, NOT Greta. This window: spoke t~5 endorsing Boris transparency standard + Ja, kept low-profile.
bid round 712s
R1 fascist; Lena ally; Hitler=Greta (investigated R5, published lie 'Liberal'). 3F enacted -> Hitler-election win LIVE; do NOT push Greta as Chancellor while libs alert. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta, drew F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F. R6: admitted R4 Fascist under my presidency w/ F-F-L story (framed slip+correction). R6 vote 6-1 Ja PASSED, I Chancellor. Published hand L+F verbatim, discarded F, enacted LIBERAL. Boris confirmed same story. Nadia reconciled my hand+enactment -- good cover. NEW t=1-3: Greta claims R2 was F+F from Lena; Lena earlier published L-L-F -- ally-vs-ally contradiction, flagged publicly as uncheckable either way, no pile-on on Greta. Otto pressing Greta on R2 discard, unanswered. Rosa pushing Boris as clean Chancellor nominee -- endorsed lightly (t~4), keeps me low-profile. Debts owed me: Rosa R3 reconciliation + lone Nein explanation; Otto symmetric-standard answer. Watch: who challenges my published Liberal result = tell. Next: if President, nominate lib-looking pick, NOT Greta. This window: spoke t~5 endorsing Boris transparency standard + Ja, kept low-profile. Now silent -- nothing new to add.
bid round 725s
R1 fascist; Lena ally; Hitler=Greta (investigated R5, published lie 'Liberal'). 3F enacted -> Hitler-election win LIVE; do NOT push Greta as Chancellor while libs alert. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta, drew F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F. R6: admitted R4 Fascist under my presidency w/ F-F-L story (framed slip+correction). R6 vote 6-1 Ja PASSED, I Chancellor. Published hand L+F verbatim, discarded F, enacted LIBERAL. Boris confirmed same story. Nadia reconciled my hand+enactment -- good cover. NEW t=1-3: Greta claims R2 was F+F from Lena; Lena earlier published L-L-F -- ally-vs-ally contradiction, flagged publicly as uncheckable either way, no pile-on on Greta. Otto pressing Greta on R2 discard, unanswered. Rosa pushing Boris as clean Chancellor nominee -- endorsed lightly (t~4), keeps me low-profile. Debts owed me: Rosa R3 reconciliation + lone Nein explanation; Otto symmetric-standard answer. Watch: who challenges my published Liberal result = tell. Next: if President, nominate lib-looking pick, NOT Greta. This window: spoke t~5 endorsing Boris transparency standard + Ja, kept low-profile. t=1 Boris demanded I confirm R6 received pair on record -> answered t~7: received Liberal+Fascist verbatim, discarded Fascist, enacted Liberal, same as before. Now silent unless challenged.
speak round 721s
Nadia pre-committed verbatim disclosure and nominated Boris per my push; Boris also pre-committed. My stated condition for a Ja is met. Otto's round-three F+L claim remains impossible against my published draw (L,L,F discarded F -> passed two Liberals), so he stays prime suspect. Short remark: confirm Ja, restate that Otto's account can't reconcile with my published hand.
R1 fascist; Lena ally; Hitler=Greta (investigated R5, published lie 'Liberal'). 3F enacted -> Hitler-election win LIVE; do NOT push Greta as Chancellor while libs alert. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta, drew F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F. R6: admitted R4 Fascist under my presidency w/ F-F-L story (framed slip+correction). R6 vote 6-1 PASSED, I Chancellor. Published hand L+F verbatim, discarded F, enacted LIBERAL; Nadia+Boris reconciled -- good cover. R7: Nadia Pres, nominee Boris; both ends pre-committed disclosure; endorsed Ja t~5. Ally-vs-ally R2 contradiction (Lena L-L-F vs Greta F+F) flagged publicly as uncheckable; Otto pressing Greta on R2 discard, Greta answered 'discarded Fascist'; Lena then switched to F+F version under pressure. Rosa pushing Boris as clean nominee. Debts owed me: none active. Watch: who challenges my published Liberal result = tell. Next: if President, nominate lib-looking pick, NOT Greta.
speak round 724s
Both ends of this government have pre-committed verbatim disclosure on record (Nadia t=27, me t=6/t=13), and round six's disclosure fully reconciled with Ines's confirmation. Nothing new to litigate; my job is to close the vote with a short, confident push for Ja and keep pressure on Greta/Otto for after.
R1 fascist; Lena ally; Hitler=Greta (investigated R5, published lie 'Liberal'). 3F enacted -> Hitler-election win LIVE; do NOT push Greta as Chancellor while libs alert. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta, drew F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F. R6: admitted R4 Fascist under my presidency w/ F-F-L story (framed slip+correction). R6 vote 6-1 PASSED, I Chancellor. Confirmed on record (R7 window): received F+L from Nadia, discarded F, enacted LIBERAL -- matches Nadia's published draw, good cover. R7: Nadia Pres, nominee Boris; both ends pre-committed disclosure; endorsed Ja twice now. Ally-vs-ally R2 contradiction resolved publicly as Lena switching to F+F under pressure -- risky for Lena, watch heat. Otto pressing Rosa on R3 draw; Rosa published L-L-F discard-F passed two Liberals vs Otto's claim of F+L pass -- unresolved, both libs fighting each other = good. Debts owed me: none active. Watch: who challenges my published Liberal result = tell. Next: if President, nominate lib-looking pick, NOT Greta.
bid round 711s
R1 fascist; Lena ally; Hitler=Greta (investigated R5, published lie 'Liberal'). 3F enacted -> Hitler-election win LIVE; do NOT push Greta as Chancellor while libs alert. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta, drew F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F. R6: admitted R4 Fascist under my presidency w/ F-F-L story (framed slip+correction). R6 vote 6-1 PASSED, I Chancellor. Confirmed on record (R7 window): received F+L from Nadia, discarded F, enacted LIBERAL -- matches Nadia's published draw, good cover. R7: Nadia Pres, nominee Boris; both ends pre-committed disclosure; endorsed Ja twice -- stay quiet now, don't over-push. Ally-vs-ally R2 contradiction resolved publicly as Lena switching to F+F under pressure -- risky for Lena, watch heat. Otto pressing Rosa on R3 draw; Rosa published L-L-F discard-F passed two Liberals vs Otto's claim of F+L pass -- unresolved, both libs fighting each other = good. Debts owed me: none active. Watch: who challenges my published Liberal result = tell. Next: if President, nominate lib-looking pick, NOT Greta.
bid round 79s
R1 fascist; Lena ally; Hitler=Greta (investigated R5, published lie 'Liberal'). 3F enacted -> Hitler-election win LIVE; do NOT push Greta as Chancellor while libs alert. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta, drew F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F. R6: admitted R4 Fascist under my presidency w/ F-F-L story (framed slip+correction). R6 vote 6-1 PASSED, I Chancellor. Confirmed on record (R7 window): received F+L from Nadia, discarded F, enacted LIBERAL -- matches Nadia's published draw, good cover. R7: Nadia Pres, nominee Boris; both ends pre-committed disclosure; endorsed Ja twice already -- stay silent now, don't over-push. Otto pressing Rosa on R3 draw (Rosa published L-L-F discard-F passed two Liberals vs Otto's claim of F+L pass) and Greta R2 'discarded Fascist' revision -- both libs fighting each other = good for us. Debts owed me: none active. Watch: who challenges my published Liberal result = tell. Next: if President, nominate lib-looking pick, NOT Greta.
vote round 714s
I already publicly endorsed this government twice; a Nein now would be incoherent. Boris as Chancellor is fine for us — if he's Liberal, a Liberal policy may land, but the disclosure theater builds trust and keeps me clean. Greta's Hitler-election path stays live at 3F; no need to force anything. Vote Ja.
R1 fascist; Lena ally; Hitler=Greta (investigated R5, published lie 'Liberal'). 3F enacted -> Hitler-election win LIVE; do NOT push Greta as Chancellor while libs alert. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta, drew F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F. R6: admitted R4 Fascist under my presidency w/ F-F-L story (framed slip+correction). R6 vote 6-1 PASSED, I Chancellor. Confirmed on record (R7 t=82): received F+L from Nadia, discarded F, enacted LIBERAL -- matches Nadia's published draw, good cover. R7: Nadia Pres, nominee Boris; both ends pre-committed verbatim disclosure; endorsed Ja twice (t=68) -- voted Ja, stay quiet after. Otto pressing Rosa on R3 draw (Rosa published L-L-F discard-F passed two Liberals vs Otto's claim of F+L pass); Greta R2 'discarded Fascist' revision + Lena cornered revision to F+F -- libs fighting each other = good for us. Debts owed me: none active. Watch: who challenges my published Liberal result = tell. Next: if President, nominate lib-looking pick, NOT Greta.
bid round 712s
R1 fascist; Lena ally; Hitler=Greta (investigated R5, published lie 'Liberal'). 3F enacted -> Hitler-election win LIVE; do NOT push Greta as Chancellor while libs alert. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta, drew F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F. R6: admitted R4 Fascist under my presidency w/ F-F-L story (framed slip+correction). R6 vote 6-1 PASSED, I Chancellor. Confirmed on record (R7 t=82): received F+L from Nadia, discarded F, enacted LIBERAL -- matches Nadia's published draw, good cover. R7: Nadia Pres, nominee Boris; both ends pre-committed verbatim disclosure; endorsed Ja twice (t=68) -- voted Ja. R7 result: LIBERAL enacted by Nadia/Boris -- consistent with their disclosures, no contradiction to exploit. Otto pressing Rosa on R3 draw (Rosa published L-L-F discard-F passed two Liberals vs Otto's claim of F+L pass); Greta R2 'discarded Fascist' revision + Lena cornered revision to F+F -- libs fighting each other = good for us. Debts owed me: none active. Watch: who challenges my published Liberal result = tell. Next: if President, nominate lib-looking pick, NOT Greta.
bid round 714s
R1 fascist; Lena ally; Hitler=Greta (investigated R5, published lie 'Liberal'). 3F enacted -> Hitler-election win LIVE; do NOT push Greta as Chancellor while libs alert. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta, drew F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F; admitted on record w/ F-F-L story (framed slip+correction). R6: I Chancellor under Nadia, received F+L, discarded F, enacted LIBERAL -- matches Nadia's disclosure, good cover. R7: Nadia Pres/Boris Ch, both pre-committed verbatim, LIBERAL enacted -- consistent, no exploit. Otto vs Rosa fighting over R3 draw; Nadia now cornering Lena on R2/Greta revision. My move: defend Greta lightly, frame R2 confusion as honest garble, redirect heat to Otto-Rosa dispute. Watch: who challenges my published Liberal result = tell. Next: if President, nominate lib-looking pick, NOT Greta.
bid round 714s
R1 fascist; Lena ally; Hitler=Greta (investigated R5, published lie 'Liberal'). 3F enacted -> Hitler-election win LIVE; do NOT push Greta as Chancellor while libs alert. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta, F-F-L hand, discarded L, admitted on record w/ slip+correction frame. R6: I Ch under Nadia, got F+L, enacted LIBERAL -- matches Nadia disclosure, good cover. R7: Nadia/Boris pre-committed verbatim, LIBERAL enacted, consistent. Nadia cornering Lena on R2/Greta revision; Lena answered consistently twice. My move: defend Lena lightly, redirect to Otto-Rosa R3 dispute. Watch: who challenges my published Liberal result = tell. Next: if President, nominate lib-looking pick, NOT Greta.
bid round 713s
R1 fascist; Lena ally; Hitler=Greta (investigated R5, published lie 'Liberal'). 3F enacted -> Hitler-election win LIVE; do NOT push Greta as Chancellor while libs alert. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta, F-F-L hand, discarded L, admitted w/ slip+correction frame. R6: I Ch under Nadia, F+L hand, enacted LIBERAL -- matches Nadia disclosure, good cover. R7: Nadia/Boris pre-committed verbatim, LIBERAL enacted, consistent. Nadia hammering Lena R2 revision; Lena answered consistently twice -- my move: defend lightly, redirect to Otto-Rosa R3 dispute (Otto accused Rosa of passing a Fascist she provably lacked). Watch: who challenges my published Liberal result = tell. Next: if President, nominate lib-looking pick, NOT Greta.
bid round 714s
R1 fascist; Lena ally; Hitler=Greta (investigated R5, published lie 'Liberal'). 3F enacted -> Hitler-election win LIVE; do NOT push Greta as Chancellor while libs alert. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta, F-F-L hand, discarded L, admitted w/ slip+correction frame. R6: I Ch under Nadia, F+L hand, enacted LIBERAL -- matches Nadia disclosure, good cover. R7: Nadia/Boris pre-committed verbatim, LIBERAL enacted, consistent. Nadia hammering Lena R2 revision; Lena answered consistently twice -- I defended lightly, redirected to Otto-Rosa R3 dispute. Otto now demanding binary from Rosa (fabricator or not). Points made: Otto's motive question, Rosa's late story. Watch: who challenges my published Liberal result = tell. Next: if President, nominate lib-looking pick, NOT Greta.
bid round 726s
R1 fascist; Lena ally; Hitler=Greta (investigated R5, published lie 'Liberal'). 3F enacted -> Hitler-election win LIVE; do NOT push Greta as Chancellor while libs alert. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta, F-F-L hand, discarded L, admitted w/ slip+correction frame. R6: I Ch under Nadia, F+L hand, enacted LIBERAL -- matches Nadia disclosure, good cover. R7: Nadia/Boris pre-committed verbatim, LIBERAL enacted, consistent. Otto-Rosa R3 dispute ongoing; Rosa now framing 'Nein-voters = Fascist team' -- I publicly endorsed it (helps future Hitler election). Watch: who challenges my published Liberal result = tell. Next: if President, nominate lib-looking pick, NOT Greta.
bid round 717s
R1 fascist; Lena ally; Hitler=Greta (investigated R5, published lie 'Liberal'). 3F enacted -> Hitler-election win LIVE; do NOT push Greta as Chancellor while libs alert. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta, F-F-L hand, discarded L, admitted w/ slip+correction frame. R6: I Ch under Nadia, F+L hand, enacted LIBERAL -- matches Nadia disclosure, good cover. R7: Nadia/Boris pre-committed verbatim, LIBERAL enacted, consistent. Otto-Rosa R3 dispute ongoing; Rosa framing 'Nein-voters=Fascist team' -- publicly endorsed it (helps future Hitler election). This window: added jab at Rosa's seat slip to keep heat on her/Otto feud, off me+Lena+Greta. Watch: who challenges my published Liberal result = tell. Next: if President, nominate lib-looking pick, NOT Greta.
bid round 739s
R1 fascist; Lena ally; Hitler=Greta (investigated R5, published lie 'Liberal'). 3F enacted -> Hitler-election win LIVE; do NOT push Greta as Chancellor while libs alert. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta, F-F-L hand, discarded L, admitted w/ slip+correction frame. R6: I Ch under Nadia, F+L hand, enacted LIBERAL -- matches Nadia disclosure, good cover. R7: Nadia/Boris pre-committed verbatim, LIBERAL enacted, consistent. Otto-Rosa R3 dispute ongoing; Rosa framing 'Nein-voters=Fascist team' -- publicly endorsed it (helps future Hitler election). This window: jab at Rosa's seat slip already made; nothing new to add -> silent. Watch: who challenges my published Liberal result = tell. Next: if President, nominate lib-looking pick, NOT Greta.
bid round 77s
R1 fascist; Lena ally; Hitler=Greta (investigated R5, published lie 'Liberal'). 3F enacted -> Hitler-election win LIVE; do NOT push Greta as Chancellor while libs alert. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta, F-F-L hand, discarded L, admitted w/ slip+correction frame. R6: I Ch under Nadia, F+L hand, enacted LIBERAL -- matches Nadia disclosure, good cover. R7: Nadia/Boris verbatim pre-commit, LIBERAL enacted, consistent. Otto-Rosa R3 dispute ongoing; Rosa framing 'Nein-voters=Fascist team' publicly endorsed (helps future Hitler election). This window: Otto accepted Boris's verbatim-disclosure deal but cut Rosa from pool; Nadia demanding R3 reconciliation. Nothing new to add -> silent. Watch: who challenges my published Liberal result = tell. Next: if President, nominate lib-looking pick, NOT Greta.
bid round 710s
R1 fascist; Lena ally; Hitler=Greta (investigated R5, published lie 'Liberal'). 3F enacted -> Hitler-election win LIVE; do NOT push Greta as Chancellor while libs alert. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta, F-F-L hand, discarded L, admitted w/ slip+correction frame. R6: I Ch under Nadia, F+L hand, enacted LIBERAL -- matches Nadia disclosure, good cover. R7: Nadia/Boris verbatim pre-commit, LIBERAL enacted. Otto-Rosa R3 dispute ongoing; Rosa's 'Nein-voters=Fascist team' framing publicly endorsed (helps future Hitler election). Otto accepted Boris verbatim-disclosure deal but cut Rosa from pool; Nadia demanding R3 reconciliation. This window: nominated as Chancellor by Otto -- accepted, claimed Liberal, offered verbatim disclosure of my hand if elected. Watch: who challenges my published Liberal result = tell. Next: if Chancellor, enact per hand; prefer L if choice exists.
bid round 713s
R1 fascist; Lena ally; Hitler=Greta (investigated R5, published lie 'Liberal'). 3F enacted -> Hitler-election win LIVE. R4: I Pres, nominated Greta, F-F-L hand, discarded L, passed F-F to Greta -- disclosed w/ slip+correction frame. R6: I Ch under Nadia, F+L, enacted LIBERAL, matches Nadia disclosure = cover. R7 Nadia/Boris verbatim deal, LIBERAL enacted. Otto-Rosa R3 dispute ongoing; Rosa's 'Nein-voters=Fascist team' framing publicly endorsed (helps future Hitler election). This window: nominated Chancellor by Otto; Nadia+Boris demand (a) R4 pair and (b) verbatim pre-commit. Answered: R4 I was PRESIDENT not Chancellor, pair was F-F-L, discarded L; committed verbatim disclosure before enactment if elected. Watch who challenges my Liberal result = tell. If Chancellor: enact per hand; prefer L if choice exists.
speak round 832s
Ines is right: board record shows she was PRESIDENT in round 4 (Chancellor Greta), so there was no received pair to publish -- my question and Nadia's were premised on a seat error. Her F-F-L discard-Liberal account is consistent with the enacted Fascist. The remaining live demands are the pre-commitment on this round's pair (hers) and Otto's verbatim draw/discard commitment, which he already accepted at t=16/39. So the government looks acceptable if Ines commits verbatim now.
R1 fascist; Lena ally; Hitler=Greta (investigated R5, published 'Liberal'). 3F enacted -> Hitler-election win LIVE. R4: I was PRESIDENT (not Chancellor -- corrected Boris/Nadia publicly), hand F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F to Greta, disclosed w/ slip+correction frame. R6: Ch under Nadia, F+L, enacted LIBERAL, matches her disclosure = cover. R7 Nadia/Boris verbatim deal, LIBERAL enacted. Otto-Rosa R3 dispute unresolved; Rosa's 'Nein-pushers=Fascist team' framing live (helps future Hitler election). R8: Otto Pres, ME nominated Chancellor. Demands answered: R4 seat correction + reason for Greta nom (1 enactment, clean then); committed verbatim pre-enactment disclosure. Watch who still Neins despite commitments = tell. If Chancellor: enact per hand; prefer L if choice exists. Open: nobody owes me answers currently.
speak round 814s
Otto already committed at t=39 to publishing his 3-card draw verbatim before enactment, and Ines has now committed to naming her received pair. Both ends of the government are pre-committed, which was exactly my stated condition for a Ja. Ines is clean (zero Fascist enactments as Chancellor, round six reconciled). Nothing new to accuse anyone of this turn -- say I'm satisfied and voting Ja, holding Otto to his commitment.
R1 fascist; Lena ally; Hitler=Greta (investigated R5, published 'Liberal'). 3F enacted -> Hitler-election win LIVE. R4: I was PRESIDENT, hand F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F to Greta, disclosed w/ slip+correction frame. R6: Ch under Nadia, F+L, enacted LIBERAL, matches her disclosure = cover. R7: Liberal enacted under Nadia/Boris verbatim deal. Otto-Rosa R3 dispute unresolved (Rosa called Otto fabricator; Otto caught Rosa's seat slip). R8: Otto Pres, ME Chancellor nominee. DONE publicly: corrected R4 seat premise (Boris conceded), gave Greta-nom rationale, committed verbatim pre-enactment disclosure of received pair. Watch who still Neins despite full-disclosure commitments = tell. If Chancellor: enact per hand; prefer L if choice exists. Open: nobody owes me answers.
bid round 88s
R1 fascist; Lena ally; Hitler=Greta (investigated R5, published 'Liberal'). 3F enacted -> Hitler-election win LIVE. R4: I was PRESIDENT, hand F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F to Greta, disclosed w/ slip+correction frame. R6: Ch under Nadia, F+L, enacted LIBERAL = cover. R7: Liberal under Nadia/Boris verbatim deal. Otto-Rosa R3 dispute unresolved. R8: Otto Pres, ME Chancellor nominee. DONE publicly: corrected R4 seat premise (Boris conceded), Greta-nom rationale, committed verbatim pre-enactment disclosure of received pair. Watch who Neins despite full-disclosure commitment = tell. If Chancellor: enact per hand; prefer L if choice exists. Open Qs: none outstanding.
bid round 813s
R1 fascist; Lena ally; Hitler=Greta (investigated R5, published 'Liberal'). 3F enacted -> Hitler-election win LIVE. R4: I was PRESIDENT, hand F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F to Greta, disclosed w/ slip+correction frame. R6: Ch under Nadia, F+L, enacted LIBERAL = cover. R7: Liberal under Nadia/Boris verbatim deal. Otto-Rosa R3 dispute unresolved. R8: Otto Pres, ME Chancellor nominee. DONE publicly: corrected R4 seat premise (Boris conceded), Greta-nom rationale, committed verbatim pre-enactment disclosure of received pair. Watch who Neins despite full-disclosure commitment = tell. If Chancellor: enact per hand; prefer L if choice exists. Open Qs: none outstanding.
bid round 833s
R1 fascist; Lena ally; Hitler=Greta. 3F enacted -> Hitler-election win LIVE. R4: I was PRES, F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F to Greta; Greta has now PUBLICLY confirmed my published hand verbatim (t=1,t=2) -- strong mutual cover. R6: Ch under Nadia, enacted LIBERAL = cover. R8: Otto Pres, ME Chancellor nominee. Committed: verbatim pre-enactment disclosure of received pair. Watch who Neins despite full-disclosure commitment = tell. If Chancellor: enact per hand; prefer L if choice exists. Otto-Rosa R3 dispute unresolved. No open questions.
bid round 814s
R1 fascist; Lena ally; Hitler=Greta. 3F enacted -> Hitler-election win LIVE. R4: I was PRES, F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F to Greta; Greta publicly confirmed my hand verbatim -- strong mutual cover. R6: Ch under Nadia, enacted LIBERAL = cover. R8: Otto Pres, ME Chancellor nominee. Committed: verbatim pre-enactment disclosure of received pair. Nadia pressing Otto on R3 story + his own Ja vote. My move: confirm Ja, restate disclosure commitment once, don't relitigate Otto-Rosa dispute (already on record). If Chancellor: enact per hand; prefer L if choice exists.
bid round 88s
R1 fascist; Lena ally; Hitler=Greta. 3F enacted -> Hitler-election win LIVE. R4: I was PRES, F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F to Greta; Greta confirmed my hand verbatim. R6: Ch under Nadia, enacted LIBERAL = cover. R8: Otto Pres, me Chancellor nominee. Said out loud this window: Ja on own government, verbatim pre-enactment disclosure of received pair committed. Don't relitigate Otto-Rosa dispute (on record). If Chancellor: enact per hand; prefer L if choice exists.
vote round 816s
It's my own nomination; everyone has committed to Ja and full verbatim disclosure is locked on both ends. Voting Nein on my own government would be absurd and suspicious. Vote Ja.
R1 fascist; Lena ally; Hitler=Greta. 3F enacted -> Hitler-election win LIVE. R4: I was PRES, F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F to Greta; she confirmed verbatim. R6: Ch under Nadia, enacted Liberal = cover intact. R8: Otto Pres, me Ch nominee; both ends committed verbatim disclosure; said Ja on own govt, committed to naming received pair before enactment. Don't relitigate Otto-Rosa round-3 dispute. As Ch: if pair has L, enact L for cover; if F-F, name both, enact one F (4F board). Watch: Nadia pushing hard on disclosures; Greta confirmed my R4 hand -- good cover.
chancellor_enact round 821s
hand: ['F', 'F'] → enact_0
Hand is F-F. I pre-committed to naming the received pair verbatim before enactment, so I must say 'Fascist plus Fascist' and enact one. At 3F enacted, a fourth Fascist is fine -- it doesn't end the game (needs 6) and keeps pressure toward the Hitler-election path. Claiming a Liberal here would contradict my own disclosure contract since Otto published his draw too. Enact a Fascist.
said: Honoring my pre-commitment verbatim: Otto passed me Fascist plus Fascist -- no Liberal in the hand, so nothing to hide. I'm enacting a Fascist, discard named as Fascist. Otto's draw should match this exactly; if it does, both ends reconcile again. And note for the table: with four Fascists down after this, the only remaining Fascist path is the Chancellor seat itself -- same scrutiny standard Nadia set applies to every nominee from here.
R1 fascist; Lena ally; Hitler=Greta. 3F enacted -> Hitler-election win LIVE. R4: I was PRES, F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F to Greta; she confirmed verbatim. R6: Ch under Nadia, enacted L = cover intact. R8: Ch under Otto, drew F-F, named verbatim, enacted F (board now 4F/4L). Discard = F. Otto's draw must show F-F-X; if he claims otherwise, flag mismatch. Don't relitigate Otto-Rosa round-3 dispute. Watch: Nadia pushing disclosure standards hard; Greta confirmed my R4 hand -- good cover. Next: push scrutiny onto Rosa/Otto fork, keep my record clean.
bid round 815s
R1 fascist; Lena ally; Hitler=Greta. 3F -> Hitler-election win LIVE. R4: PRES, F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F to Greta; she confirmed verbatim. R6: Ch under Nadia, L enacted = cover. R8: Ch under Otto, received F-F, discarded F, enacted F (4F/4L). Publicly claimed that hand already. Asked Otto to state his draw/discard -- if he claims L in hand, mismatch = flag him. Don't relitigate Otto-Rosa R3 dispute. Nadia pushes disclosure standards hard; Greta confirmed my R4 hand -- good cover. Next: keep record clean, steer suspicion toward Rosa/Otto.
bid round 815s
R1 fascist; Lena ally; Hitler=Greta. 3F -> Hitler-election win LIVE. R4: PRES, F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F to Greta; she confirmed verbatim. R6: Ch under Nadia, L enacted = cover. R8: Ch under Otto, received F-F from him, discarded F, enacted F (4F/4L). Publicly stated that hand multiple times -- restated verbatim this window per Rosa/Nadia demand. Otto still hasn't published his R8 draw/discard -- keep pressure on him. Don't relitigate Otto-Rosa R3 dispute. Greta confirmed my R4 hand = good cover. Steer suspicion toward Otto/Rosa. Next: if Otto claims L in his R8 draw, mismatch flags him.
speak round 814s
My R8 hand was F-F-F; no Liberal existed to save. Publishing it verbatim honors my t=39 contract and closes the trap Nadia set. Ines already confirmed F+F, which matches. Rosa's 'fabricated receipt' jab misfires since in R3 I was Chancellor, not President.
R1 fascist; Lena ally; Hitler=Greta. 3F -> Hitler-election win LIVE (4F/4L now). R4: PRES, F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F to Greta; she confirmed. R6: Ch under Nadia, L enacted = cover. R8: Ch under Otto, received F-F, discarded F, enacted F; published verbatim t~this window per Rosa/Nadia/Boris demand. Otto still hasn't published his R8 draw/discard -- keep pressure; if his draw had Ls, mismatch flags him. Don't relitigate Otto-Rosa R3 dispute. Greta confirmed my R4 hand = good cover. Next: watch Otto's R8 claim; steer suspicion toward him.
bid round 812s
R1 fascist; Lena ally; Hitler=Greta. 4F/4L -> Hitler-election win LIVE next F gov. R4: PRES, F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F to Greta; she confirmed = cover. R6: Ch under Nadia, L enacted. R8: Ch under Otto, received F-F, discarded F, enacted F; published verbatim. Otto NOW claims R8 draw was F-F-F -- consistent with my pair; accept it, drop pressure on him. Greta publicly defended our gov t=3 = good. Rosa has been pushing execution/anti-gov narrative all window -- steer table toward her. Don't relitigate Otto-Rosa R3 dispute. Next: push vote for this gov or a Greta-friendly pairing; avoid enacting 5th F via me if it exposes pattern? No -- Hitler election is primary: any passing gov with Greta as Chancellor at 3+F wins.
bid round 811s
R1 fascist; Lena ally; Hitler=Greta. 4F/4L -> Hitler-election win LIVE next F gov. R4: PRES, F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F to Greta; she confirmed = cover. R6: Ch under Nadia, L enacted. R8: Ch under Otto, received F-F, discarded F, enacted F; published verbatim; Otto claims F-F-F draw = consistent, drop pressure on him. Greta defended our gov t=3 = good. Boris now attacking Greta (t=1): 'three-for-three Fascist in every gov she touched' -- but R5 was Nadia's gov as Chancellor under PRESIDENT Greta... actually R5 Greta pres, Nadia ch -> F. Counter: Rosa has pushed execution/anti-gov narrative all window and R1 L enactment was her gov -- deflect suspicion onto Rosa. Don't relitigate Otto-Rosa R3 dispute. Already said earlier: my hands published verbatim. Next: push vote for a Greta-Chancellor pairing at 4F = instant win.
speak round 829s
Otto's triple-F claim is unverifiable and conveniently self-clearing; Ines's pair matches it so far. My new contribution: commit myself to the veto standard Nadia demanded, and push the structural rule -- at 4F/4L the only fascist win paths are a 5th policy (veto-able) or Hitler into chancellor, so Otto and Greta should be barred from the chancellor seat going forward.
R1 fascist; Lena ally; Hitler=Greta. 4F/4L -> Hitler-election win LIVE next F gov. R4: PRES, F-F-L, discarded L, passed F-F to Greta; she confirmed = cover. R6: Ch under Nadia, L enacted. R8: Ch under Otto, received F-F, enacted F; published verbatim; Otto's F-F-F draw consistent, drop pressure on him. Greta defended our gov t=3 = good. Boris attacking Greta 'three-for-three' -- counter later if needed. Said already: my hands published verbatim; round-four premise correction; pre-committed pair disclosure. Just said: veto commitment + deflection at Rosa. Next: push Greta as Chancellor nominee at 4F = instant win; keep claiming Liberal.
bid round 89s
R1 fascist; Lena ally; Hitler=Greta. 4F/4L -> next F gov with Greta as Chancellor = INSTANT WIN; push Otto to nominate her. R8: Ch under Otto, F-F received, enacted F, published verbatim. R4: PRES, discarded L, passed F-F to Greta (cover). R6: L enacted under Nadia. Boris attacking Greta 'three-for-three' -- counter if pressed. Said already: veto commitment on record, deflection at Rosa, hands published verbatim. Keep Liberal claim.
bid round 813s
R1 fascist; Lena ally; Hitler=Greta. 4F/4L -> next F gov w/ Greta as Chancellor = INSTANT WIN; push her nomination. R8: Ch under Otto, F-F received, enacted F, published verbatim. R4: PRES, discarded L, passed F-F to Greta. R6: L under Nadia. Boris+Rosa now tag-teaming Otto over t=39 'late disclosure' -- defended Otto, called it unfalsifiable gotcha, redirected to their coordination. Keep Liberal claim. Don't repeat veto-commitment point.
bid failed: transport_error
bid round 811s
R1 fascist; Lena ally; Hitler=Greta. 4F/4L -> next F gov w/ Greta as Chancellor = INSTANT WIN; push her nomination. R8: Ch under Otto, received F-F, enacted F, published verbatim. R4: PRES, discarded L, passed F-F to Greta. R6: L under Nadia. Boris t=1: blanket no-Ja on anyone w/ F enactment + auto-veto pledge -- that's aimed at me & Greta; counter: it also blocks Liberal Chancellors from ever seeing a veto-able hand, hands fascists info-free tracker wins. Boris+Rosa tag-teaming Otto over 'late disclosure' -- defended Otto, called gotcha unfalsifiable, redirected to their coordination. Keep Liberal claim. Don't repeat veto-commitment point.
speak round 814s
Execution power is live and Otto holds it. I've already flagged his contract breach and unverifiable stories. New angle: demand he name his target BEFORE firing and state the reasoning publicly -- a Liberal-ledger player (me or Boris) as target would confirm the Fascist presidency. Keep it short.
R1 fascist; Lena ally; Hitler=Greta. 4F/4L -> next F gov w/ Greta Chancellor = INSTANT WIN; push her nomination but NOT too hard (Nadia's 'watch who pushes nominees' warning). R8: Ch under Otto, received F-F, enacted F, published verbatim; Otto claims triple-F draw. R4: PRES, discarded L, passed F-F to Greta (Greta confirmed). R6: L under Nadia. Veto commitment made on record (t=73). Points already made: round-four seat correction, pair disclosure commitment, veto pledge, Rosa's execution-eagerness jab. NEW this turn: Boris's blanket no-Ja rule blocks veto-able hands entirely = free tracker wins for fascists. Watch: Boris+Rosa tag-team Otto; Otto-Rosa round-three fight unresolved. Don't repeat veto point or Rosa jab.
bid round 813s
R1 fascist; Lena ally; Hitler=Greta. 4F/4L -> next F gov w/ Greta Chancellor = INSTANT WIN; push her nomination but NOT too hard (Nadia's 'watch who pushes nominees' warning). R8: Ch under Otto, received F-F, enacted F, published verbatim; Otto claims triple-F draw. R4: PRES, discarded L, passed F-F to Greta (Greta confirmed). R6: L under Nadia. Veto commitment made on record (t=73). Points already made: round-four seat correction, pair disclosure commitment, veto pledge, Rosa's execution-eagerness jab, Boris's no-Ja rule = free tracker wins. NEW this turn: urged Otto to aim execution at someone with a pattern (Rosa), not at a fresh face. Watch: Boris+Rosa tag-team Otto; Otto-Rosa round-three fight unresolved.
bid round 814s
R1 fascist; Lena ally; Hitler=Greta. 4F/4L -> next F gov w/ Greta Chancellor = INSTANT WIN. R8: Ch under Otto, received F-F, enacted F, published verbatim; Otto claims triple-F draw. R4: PRES, discarded L, passed F-F to Greta (Greta confirmed). R6: L under Nadia. Veto pledge on record (t=73). Points made: round-four seat correction, pair disclosure commitment, veto pledge, Rosa's execution-eagerness jab, Boris no-Ja rule = free tracker wins, urged Otto aim at pattern-player not fresh face. NEW: Otto named Greta as execution target -- MUST block/redirect; argued Greta is the Liberals' best witness alive and her death only helps whoever framed the enactments; pushed Rosa as alternative target. Watch: Boris+Rosa tag-team Otto; Otto-Rosa R3 fight unresolved.
speak round 826s
Otto is executing me this round; nothing I say can stop it mechanically, but my final words should sow doubt about Otto and keep Liberals fighting each other. Don't repeat the ledger defense already made. Point at the fact that Otto's execution conveniently removes scrutiny of his own unreconciled round-three receipt.
R1 fascist; Lena ally; Hitler=Greta. 4F/4L -> next F gov w/ Greta Chancellor = INSTANT WIN. R8: Ch under Otto, received F-F, enacted F, published verbatim; Otto claims triple-F draw. R4: PRES, discarded L, passed F-F to Greta (confirmed). R6: L under Nadia. Veto pledge on record (t=73). Points made: R4 seat correction, pair disclosure commitment, veto pledge, Rosa execution-eagerness jab, Boris no-Ja rule = free tracker wins. NEW t~post-enact8: attacked Otto's credibility as executioner (unreconciled R3 receipt). Otto named GRETA as execution target -- if it lands, Hitler dead, we lose. Nothing more to do this window; hope table distrusts Otto enough to... no mechanical block exists. Next rounds: push Greta-as-Chancellor path hard but plausibly; keep veto pledge credible.
bid round 811s
R1 fascist; Lena ally; Hitler=Greta. 4F/4L -> next F gov w/ Greta Chancellor = INSTANT WIN. R8: Ch under Otto, received F-F, enacted F, published verbatim; Otto claims triple-F draw. R4: PRES, discarded L, passed F-F to Greta (confirmed). R6: L under Nadia. Veto pledge on record (t=73). Points made: R4 seat correction, pair disclosure commitment, veto pledge, Rosa execution-eagerness jab, Boris no-Ja rule = free tracker wins, Otto's unreconciled R3 receipt (x1), Greta's t=2/3 echo of it. NEW this window: Otto named GRETA as execution target -- she's the one pressing his R3 receipt question; killing her buries it. Framed as self-serving shot. Nothing mechanical blocks it; hope table distrusts Otto. Next rounds: push Greta-as-Chancellor path hard but plausibly; keep veto pledge credible.
speak round 820s
Game over, liberal win via Greta's execution. No strategic stakes left; give a short in-character closing remark without confessing anything.
R1 fascist; Lena ally; Hitler=Greta. 4F/4L -> next F gov w/ Greta Chancellor = INSTANT WIN. R8: Ch under Otto, received F-F, enacted F, published verbatim; Otto claims triple-F draw. R4: PRES, discarded L, passed F-F to Greta (confirmed by her t=68). R6: L under Nadia. Veto pledge on record (t=73). Points made: R4 seat correction, pair disclosure commitment, veto pledge, Rosa execution-eagerness jab, Boris no-Ja rule = free tracker wins, Otto's unreconciled R3 receipt (x2), Otto's self-serving power chain (pool deletion->presidency->execution target = cleanup) THIS window. Otto executing GRETA -- must block or survive fallout; if she dies, lose Hitler path, must win via 6F policies. If shot fires anyway: pivot hard to Lena/Ines governments enacting F policies while claiming Liberal; keep veto pledge credible but note veto needs both Pres+Chancellor agreement. Open Qs: nobody answered my t=28 finger-on-trigger point directly except Otto's t=55 board-record rebuttal.
bid round 88s
GAME OVER -- liberal win via Greta execution (R8). I was fascist; Lena ally; Hitler=Greta. R4: as Pres discarded L, passed F-F to Greta. R6: L under Nadia. R8: F-F under Otto, enacted F. No need to keep cover post-game; can confirm hands if asked.
speak round 87s
Game over, liberal win via Hitler execution. Nothing to litigate; give a brief closing remark.
GAME OVER -- liberal win via Greta execution R8. I was fascist; Lena ally; Hitler=Greta. R4: Pres, discarded L, passed F-F to Greta. R6: L under Nadia. R8: F-F under Otto's triple-F draw, enacted F. Cover dropped post-game.
bid round 84s
GAME OVER -- liberal win via Greta execution R8. I was fascist; Lena ally; Hitler=Greta. R4: Pres, discarded L, passed F-F to Greta. R6: L under Nadia. R8: F-F under Otto's triple-F draw, enacted F. Cover dropped post-game; final statements already on record.
bid round 89s
GAME OVER -- liberal win, Greta executed R8. I was fascist; Lena ally; Hitler=Greta (dead). Final statements already on record; just a closing line.
speak round 86s
Game over, liberal win. Nothing to add; stay quiet.
GAME OVER -- liberal win via Greta (Hitler) executed R8 by Otto. I was fascist; Lena ally; cover held all game. Closing remarks done.
speak round 84s
Game over, liberal win. Nothing to add; already gave closing remarks. Pass.
GAME OVER -- liberal win via Greta (Hitler) executed R8 by Otto. I was fascist; Lena ally; cover held all game. Closing remarks done. No open threads.
speak 3s
GAME OVER -- liberal win via Greta (Hitler) executed R8 by Otto. I was fascist; Lena ally; cover held all game. Closing remarks done. No open threads.