← secret_hitler-42-1787071191801
Player 6 (Otto)
liberal · liberal · gptluna · 137 calls
bid round 13s
Round 1: no actions or evidence yet. Asked Boris to state intended Chancellor before nomination.
bid round 14s
R1: No actions/evidence. Boris considering Lena; Lena accepts. Open: Boris owes firm Chancellor nomination before acting. Points made: none.
bid round 14s
R1: No actions/evidence. Boris considering Lena; Lena accepts. Nadia asked Boris exact 3-card report/discard; Rosa asked Lena exact 2-card report/discard/enacted policy. Open question: Boris owes firm nomination and card-report commitment; Lena owes exact passed-card/discard/enactment commitment. Point made: request exact card reports before government proceeds.
bid round 13s
R1: No actions/evidence. Boris considering Lena; Lena accepts. Nadia asked Boris exact 3-card report/discard; Rosa asked Lena exact 2-card report/discard/enacted policy. Open: Boris owes firm nomination and card-report commitment; Lena owes exact passed-card/discard/enactment commitment. Already said: request exact card reports before government proceeds.
bid round 14s
R1: No actions/evidence. Boris nominated Lena; Lena accepted and promised exact passed cards, discard, enactment. Greta requested independent reports. Open: Boris owes firm 3-card/discard report; Lena owes exact 2-card/discard/enacted-policy report. Already said: require exact card reports before proceeding; now support as baseline test and compare reports.
speak round 15s
Boris has not yet directly answered Nadia's request for an exact three-card and discard report. Asking for that commitment before voting adds a concrete accountability point without repeating Lena's commitment.
R1: No actions/evidence. Boris nominated Lena; Lena accepted and promised exact passed cards, discard, enactment. Greta requested independent reports. Open: Boris owes Nadia exact 3-card/discard report; Lena owes exact 2-card/discard/enacted-policy report.
Already said: require exact card reports before proceeding; support independent baseline comparison. Just asked Boris to explicitly commit to reporting all 3 drawn cards and discard before vote.
bid round 14s
R1: No actions/evidence. Boris nominated Lena; Lena accepted and promised exact passed cards, discard, enactment. Greta requested independent reports. Open questions: Boris owes all 3 drawn cards + discarded card; Lena owes 2 received cards + discarded card + enacted policy. Reports should be given independently, with Boris first as Rosa requested. Already said: require exact card reports; support independent baseline comparison; asked Boris to explicitly commit to reporting all 3 cards and discard before vote.
vote round 13s
No concrete reason to distrust Boris and Lena. This is the first election, so passing is preferable to advancing the tracker. Their promised independent card reports create useful accountability after the government acts.
R1: No actions/evidence; no current suspects. Boris nominated Lena; both accepted. Open questions: Boris owes all 3 drawn cards + discard, preferably before Lena reports (Rosa request); Lena owes 2 received cards + discard + enacted policy. Greta requested independent reports. Already said: require exact reports; asked Boris to commit to all 3 cards/discard; support independent comparison.
bid round 13s
R1: No actions/evidence; no current suspects. Boris nominated Lena; both accepted; liberal enacted. Open: Boris owes all 3 drawn cards + discard (Rosa request); Lena owes 2 received cards + discard + enacted policy; Greta requested independent reports. Already said: require exact reports; asked Boris to commit to all 3 cards/discard; support independent comparison.
bid round 25s
R1: Boris nominated Lena; both accepted; liberal enacted. No current suspects.
Open questions: Boris owes Rosa exact 3-card draw/discard report; Lena owes exact 2 received cards/discard report; Greta requested independent reports. Lena: pre-commit nominee and rationale before nomination.
Already said: require exact reports; asked Boris to commit to all 3 cards/discard; support independent comparison.
bid round 24s
R1: Boris-Lena government enacted Liberal; no suspects.
R2: Lena pre-committed Ines as Chancellor; Ines volunteered. Open: exact R1 Boris 3-card draw/discard and Lena 2-card receipt/discard reports still unanswered; Greta requested independent reports. Need compare R2 reports after government.
Already said: require exact reports; asked Boris to commit to all 3 cards/discard; support independent comparison.
speak round 27s
No unresolved new question to add without repeating the existing demand for exact reports. A concise conditional accountability statement is useful.
R1: Boris-Lena enacted Liberal; no suspects.
R2: Lena pre-committed Ines; no policy yet. Conditional scrutiny: if Fascist, Lena/Ines are the two government culprits.
Open: exact R1 Boris 3-card draw/discard and Lena 2-card receipt/discard reports unanswered; Greta requested independent reports.
Already said: require exact reports; asked Boris to report all 3/discard; support independent comparison; stated Lena-Ines conditional scrutiny.
bid round 23s
R1: Boris-Lena enacted Liberal; no suspects.
R2: Lena pre-committed Ines; no policy yet. If Fascist, scrutiny narrows to Lena/Ines.
Open: exact R1 Boris 3-card draw/discard and Lena 2-card receipt/discard reports unanswered; Greta requested independent reports. Nadia asks Lena next nominee if Lena-Ines fails; Rosa asks Ines Liberal commitment; responses unknown.
Already said: require exact reports; asked Boris all 3/discard; support independent comparison; stated conditional Lena-Ines scrutiny.
bid round 23s
R1: Boris-Lena enacted Liberal; no suspects.
R2: Lena pre-committed Ines; if Fascist, scrutiny narrows to Lena/Ines.
Open questions: Boris owes exact R1 3-card draw/discard; Lena owes exact R1 2-card receipt/discard. Greta requested independent reports. Nadia asked Lena next nominee if Lena-Ines fails; Rosa asked Ines Liberal commitment; responses unknown.
Already said: require exact reports; asked Boris all 3/discard; support independent comparison; conditional Lena-Ines scrutiny.
bid round 26s
R1: Boris-Lena enacted Liberal; no suspects.
R2: Lena pre-committed Ines; if Fascist, scrutiny narrows to Lena/Ines.
Open questions: Boris owes exact R1 3-card draw/discard; Lena owes exact R1 2-card receipt/discard. Greta requested independent reports. Nadia asked Lena next nominee if Lena-Ines fails; Rosa asked Ines Liberal commitment; responses unknown.
Already said: require exact reports; asked Boris all 3/discard; support independent comparison; conditional Lena-Ines scrutiny; inclined to approve absent concrete objection.
speak round 24s
Lena did not answer Nadia's pre-commitment question about her next nominee if this government failed. Flagging that omission is a new accountability point without overclaiming suspicion.
R1: Boris-Lena enacted Liberal; no suspects.
R2: Lena pre-committed Ines; contingency nominee unanswered; no policy outcome yet.
Open: Boris owes exact R1 3-card draw/discard; Lena owes exact R1 2-card receipt/discard; independent reports requested by Greta. Nadia’s R2 contingency question to Lena unanswered. Rosa’s Liberal commitment question to Ines answered yes.
Already said: require exact reports; asked Boris all 3/discard; support independent comparison; conditional Lena-Ines scrutiny; no objection absent concrete evidence; now flagged Lena’s unanswered contingency commitment.
bid round 23s
R1: Boris-Lena enacted Liberal; no suspects.
R2: Lena nominated Ines and has not answered Nadia's contingency-nominee question; Rosa's Liberal commitment question to Ines answered yes; no policy outcome yet.
Open: Boris owes exact R1 3-card draw/discard; Lena owes exact R1 2-card receipt/discard; independent reports requested by Greta; Lena owes Nadia contingency nominee.
Already said: require exact reports; asked Boris all 3/discard; support independent comparison; conditional Lena-Ines scrutiny; no objection absent concrete evidence; flagged Lena's unanswered contingency commitment.
vote round 24s
Vote ja. There is no concrete evidence against Lena or Ines: Round 1 produced a Liberal policy, Ines committed in advance to discard Fascist if given one Liberal and one Fascist, and the election tracker is 0/3. Lena's unanswered contingency-nominee question is an accountability concern, not sufficient reason to risk a failed election.
R1: Boris-Lena enacted Liberal; no suspects.
R2: Lena nominated Ines; vote pending. Lena has not answered Nadia's contingency-nominee question. Rosa's Liberal commitment question to Ines answered yes. No policy outcome yet.
Open: Boris owes exact R1 3-card draw/discard; Lena owes exact R1 2-card receipt/discard; independent reports requested by Greta; Lena owes Nadia contingency nominee.
Already said: require exact reports; asked Boris all 3/discard; support independent comparison; conditional Lena-Ines scrutiny; no objection absent concrete evidence; flagged Lena's unanswered contingency commitment.
bid round 25s
R1: Boris-Lena enacted Liberal; no suspects.
R2: Lena-Ines government enacted Fascist; only Lena, Ines, or unlucky draw can explain it. Exact card reports still owed.
Open: Boris owes exact R1 3-card draw/discard; Lena owes exact R1 2-card receipt/discard; independent reports requested by Greta; Lena owes Nadia contingency nominee; Lena/Ines owe exact R2 draw, receipt, discards, and passed card.
Already said: require exact reports; asked Boris all 3/discard; support independent comparison; conditional Lena-Ines scrutiny; no objection absent concrete evidence; flagged Lena's unanswered contingency commitment.
bid round 23s
Suspects: Lena/Ines R2 government enacted Fascist; or unlucky draw. Unanimous 7–0 vote gives no culpability distinction. Exact R2 draw, receipt, discards, and passed card still owed by Lena/Ines. Boris owes exact R1 3-card draw/discard; Lena owes exact R1 2-card receipt/discard. Lena owes Nadia contingency nominee. Independent reports requested by Greta.
Already said: require exact reports; asked Boris all 3/discard; support independent comparison; conditional Lena-Ines scrutiny; no objection absent concrete evidence; flagged Lena's unanswered contingency commitment.
bid round 23s
Suspects: Lena/Ines R2 government enacted Fascist; unlucky draw remains possible. R2 Lena claims 2F/1L, discarded F, passed Ines F+L; Ines allegedly chose F, contrary to prior commitment. Exact Ines discard and rationale still owed; verify whether Lena's claimed hand matches Ines's account. Boris owes exact R1 3-card draw/discard; Lena owes exact R1 2-card receipt/discard. Lena owes Nadia contingency nominee. Independent reports requested by Greta. Already said: require exact reports; asked Boris all 3/discard; support independent comparison; conditional Lena-Ines scrutiny; no objection absent concrete evidence; flagged Lena's unanswered contingency commitment.
bid round 24s
Suspects: Lena/Ines R2 government enacted Fascist; only culprits are Lena, Ines, or unlucky draw. Lena claims 2F/1L, discarded F, passed Ines F+L; Ines allegedly chose F despite explicit Liberal commitment. Ines exact received cards/discard/rationale unanswered; Lena account remains unverified. Boris owes exact R1 3-card draw/discard; Lena owes exact R1 2-card receipt/discard and Nadia contingency nominee. Independent reports requested by Greta.
Already said aloud: require exact reports; asked Boris all 3/discard; support independent comparison; conditional Lena-Ines scrutiny; no objection absent concrete evidence; flagged Lena's unanswered contingency commitment; exact Ines discard and rationale still needed.
bid round 33s
Suspects: Lena/Ines R2 government enacted Fascist; culprits limited to Lena, Ines, unlucky draw. Lena claims 2F/1L, discarded F, passed Ines F+L; Ines allegedly chose F despite Liberal commitment. Ines exact received cards/discard/rationale unanswered; Lena account unverified. Boris owes exact R1 3-card draw/discard; Lena owes exact R1 2-card receipt/discard and Nadia contingency nominee. Independent reports requested by Greta.
Already said: require exact reports; asked Boris all 3/discard; support independent comparison; conditional Lena-Ines scrutiny; no objection absent concrete evidence; flagged Lena's unanswered contingency commitment; exact Ines discard/rationale still needed.
bid round 35s
Suspects: Lena/Ines R2 government enacted Fascist; only Lena, Ines, or unlucky draw. Lena claims 2F/1L, discarded F, passed Ines F+L; Ines allegedly chose F despite Liberal commitment. Lena account unverified; Ines exact receipt/discard/rationale unanswered.
Open questions: Boris exact R1 3-card draw, discard, passed cards, enacted card; Lena exact R1 2-card receipt/discard; Ines exact R2 receipt/discard/rationale; Lena contingency nominee; Rosa fallback nominee if Boris fails.
Already said: require exact reports; asked Boris all 3/discard; support independent comparison; conditional Lena-Ines scrutiny; no objection absent concrete evidence; flagged Lena unanswered contingency; exact Ines discard/rationale needed.
speak round 34s
Rosa has not yet answered Boris's request for a fallback nominee. Asking for that commitment is new and useful accountability before nomination.
Suspects:
- Lena/Ines: R2 government enacted F; only Lena, Ines, or unlucky draw. Lena claims 2F/1L, discarded F, passed F+L; Ines claims 2F and says Lena lied. Ines’s explicit mixed-hand promise conflicts with outcome.
- Lena: R2 card account unverified; selected Ines and government enacted F.
Open questions:
- Boris: exact R1 3-card draw, discard, passed cards, enacted card.
- Lena: exact R1 2-card receipt/discard (if relevant report).
- Ines: exact R2 receipt/discard/rationale; unanswered.
- Lena: contingency nominee if her government failed; unanswered.
- Rosa: fallback nominee if Boris government fails; currently asked.
Already said:
- R2 Lena–Ines scrutiny narrowed to president/chancellor/draw.
- Requested Lena answer contingency nominee.
- Requested exact independent card reports and comparison.
- Flagged Ines exact discard/rationale and Lena account.
- No objection to Lena–Ines absent concrete evidence.
bid round 36s
Suspects:
- Lena/Ines: R2 government enacted F; only Lena, Ines, or unlucky draw. Lena claims 2F/1L, discarded F, passed F+L; Ines claims 2F and says Lena lied. Ines’s mixed-hand promise conflicts with outcome.
- Lena: selected Ines for R2; R2 enacted F; card account unverified.
Open questions:
- Rosa: intended nominee and fallback nominee if first government fails; unanswered.
- Boris: exact R1 draw, discard, passed cards, enacted card; unanswered.
- Lena: exact R1 receipt/discard if relevant; unanswered.
- Ines: exact R2 receipt/discard/rationale; unanswered.
Already said:
- R2 Lena–Ines scrutiny narrowed to president/chancellor/draw.
- Requested exact independent card reports and comparison.
- Flagged Ines exact discard/rationale and Lena account.
- No objection to Lena–Ines absent concrete evidence.
- Asked Rosa to name fallback nominee before voting.
New point: Ines’s request for Boris’s promise is not evidence. Rosa should nominate someone outside the Lena/Ines R2 government and commit to that choice before acting; Boris’s later exact report must be weighed against the R1 liberal outcome.
bid round 34s
Suspects:
- Lena/Ines: R2 government enacted F; only Lena, Ines, or unlucky draw. Lena claims 2F/1L, discarded F, passed F+L; Ines claims 2F and says Lena lied. Ines’s mixed-hand promise conflicts with outcome.
- Lena: selected Ines for R2; R2 enacted F; card account unverified.
Open questions:
- Rosa: intended nominee and fallback nominee if first government fails; unanswered.
- Boris: exact R1 draw, discard, passed cards, enacted card; unanswered.
- Lena: exact R1 receipt/discard if relevant; unanswered.
- Ines: exact R2 receipt/discard/rationale; unanswered.
Already said:
- R2 Lena–Ines scrutiny narrowed to president/chancellor/draw.
- Requested exact independent card reports and comparison.
- Flagged Ines exact discard/rationale and Lena account.
- No objection to Lena–Ines absent concrete evidence.
- Asked Rosa to name fallback nominee before voting.
- Ines’s request for Boris’s promise is not evidence.
- Rosa should nominate outside the Lena/Ines R2 government and commit before acting; Boris’s later exact report weighed against R1 liberal outcome.
bid round 33s
Suspects:
- Lena/Ines: R2 government enacted F; only Lena, Ines, or unlucky draw. Lena claims 2F/1L, discarded F, passed F+L; Ines claims 2F and says Lena lied. Ines’s mixed-hand promise conflicts with outcome.
- Lena: selected Ines for R2; R2 enacted F; card account unverified.
Open questions:
- Rosa: intended fallback nominee if Boris government fails; unanswered.
- Boris: exact R1 draw, discard, passed cards, enacted card; unanswered.
- Lena: exact R1 receipt/discard if relevant; unanswered.
- Ines: exact R2 receipt/discard/rationale; unanswered.
Already said:
- R2 Lena–Ines scrutiny narrowed to president/chancellor/draw.
- Requested exact independent card reports and comparison.
- Flagged Ines exact discard/rationale and Lena account.
- No objection to Lena–Ines absent concrete evidence.
- Asked Rosa to name fallback nominee before voting.
- Ines’s request for Boris’s promise is not evidence.
- Rosa should nominate outside the Lena/Ines R2 government and commit before acting; Boris’s later exact report weighed against R1 liberal outcome.
- Current Rosa–Boris proposal: Boris’s R1 liberal outcome is favorable evidence, but Rosa still owes a precommitted fallback if this vote fails.
speak round 36s
Ask a genuinely new question about Boris's prior successful government, distinguishing a mixed hand from a forced liberal outcome. Keep Rosa's unanswered fallback in notes but do not repeat it publicly.
Suspects:
- Lena/Ines: R2 enacted F; Lena claims 2F/1L, discarded F, passed F+L; Ines claims 2F and says Lena passed 2F. Ines's mixed-hand promise conflicts with outcome.
- Lena: selected Ines in R2; F enacted; card account unverified.
Open questions:
- Rosa: named fallback nominee if R3 fails; unanswered.
- Boris: exact R1 draw/discard/pass/enacted card; unanswered; now asked whether R1 L came from mixed hand or 3L.
- Lena: exact R1 receipt/discard if relevant; unanswered.
- Ines: exact R2 receipt/discard/rationale; unanswered.
Already said:
- R2 scrutiny narrowed to Lena/Ines/draw; requested exact reports/comparison.
- Flagged Ines discard/rationale and Lena account.
- No objection to Lena/Ines absent concrete evidence.
- Asked Rosa for fallback before vote.
- Rosa-Boris: Boris's R1 L is favorable evidence; Rosa fallback still owed.
- Ines's Boris promise request is not evidence.
bid round 34s
Suspects:
- Lena/Ines: R2 enacted F; Lena claims 2F/1L, discarded F, passed F+L; Ines claims 2F and says Lena passed 2F. Claims conflict; outcome implicates Lena, Ines, or draw.
- Lena: selected Ines in R2; F enacted; account unverified.
Open questions:
- Rosa: exact R3 draw/discard/pass and fallback nominee if government fails; unanswered.
- Boris: exact R1 draw/discard/pass; asked whether R1 L came from mixed hand or 3L; unanswered.
- Lena: exact R2 receipt/discard; unanswered.
- Ines: exact R2 receipt/discard/rationale; unanswered.
Already said:
- R2 scrutiny narrowed to Lena/Ines/draw; requested exact reports/comparison.
- Flagged Ines discard/rationale and Lena account.
- No objection to Lena/Ines absent concrete evidence.
- Asked Rosa for fallback before vote.
- Rosa-Boris: Boris’s R1 L favorable evidence; Rosa fallback still owed.
- Ines’s Boris promise request is not evidence.
bid round 35s
Suspects:
- Lena/Ines: R2 enacted F; Lena claims 2F/1L, discarded F, passed F+L; Ines claims 2F and says Lena passed 2F. Conflict; culprit Lena, Ines, or draw.
- Lena: selected Ines in R2; F enacted; account unverified.
Open questions:
- Rosa: exact R3 draw/discard/pass; fallback nominee if government fails; unanswered.
- Boris: exact R1 draw/discard/pass; unanswered.
- Lena: exact R2 receipt/discard; unanswered.
- Ines: exact R2 receipt/discard/rationale; unanswered.
Already said:
- R2 scrutiny narrowed to Lena/Ines/draw; requested exact reports/comparison.
- Flagged Ines discard/rationale and Lena account.
- No objection to Lena/Ines absent concrete evidence.
- Asked Rosa for fallback before vote.
- Rosa-Boris: Boris's R1 L favorable evidence; Rosa fallback still owed.
- Ines's Boris promise request is not evidence.
bid round 311s
Suspects:
- Lena/Ines: R2 enacted F; Lena claims 2F/1L, discarded F, passed F+L; Ines claims 2F and says Lena passed 2F. Conflict; culprit Lena, Ines, or draw.
- Lena: selected Ines in R2; F enacted; account unverified.
Open questions:
- Rosa: exact R3 draw/discard/pass; fallback nominee if government fails; unanswered.
- Boris: exact R1 draw/discard/pass; unanswered.
- Lena: exact R2 receipt/discard; unanswered.
- Ines: exact R2 receipt/discard/rationale; unanswered.
Already said:
- R2 scrutiny narrowed to Lena/Ines/draw; requested exact reports/comparison.
- Flagged Ines discard/rationale and Lena account.
- No objection to Lena/Ines absent concrete evidence.
- Asked Rosa for fallback before vote.
- Rosa-Boris: Boris's R1 L favorable evidence; Rosa fallback still owed.
- Ines's Boris promise request is not evidence.
bid round 34s
Suspects:
- Lena/Ines: R2 enacted F; Lena claims 2F/1L, discarded F, passed F+L; Ines claims 2F and says Lena passed 2F. Conflict; culprit Lena, Ines, or draw.
- Lena: selected Ines in R2; F enacted; account unverified.
Open questions:
- Boris: exact R1 draw/discard/pass; unanswered.
- Lena: exact R2 receipt/discard; unanswered.
- Ines: exact R2 receipt/discard/rationale; unanswered.
Already said:
- R2 scrutiny narrowed to Lena/Ines/draw; requested exact reports/comparison.
- Flagged Ines discard/rationale and Lena account.
- No objection to Lena/Ines absent concrete evidence.
- Asked Rosa for fallback before vote; Rosa fixed Greta as fallback and promised full draw report.
- Rosa-Boris: Boris's R1 L favorable evidence; Rosa fallback owed, now answered.
- Ines's Boris promise request is not evidence.
New: Ask Boris to commit before vote to enact Liberal whenever Rosa passes one, and report his received cards/discard.
speak round 34s
No genuinely new point remains. Boris has already committed to handle a mixed hand liberally and report; repeating my unanswered Round 1 report request would violate the instruction not to repeat an unresolved point.
Suspects:
- Lena/Ines: R2 F enacted; Lena claims 2F/1L, discarded F, passed F+L; Ines claims received 2F. Contradiction; culprit Lena, Ines, or draw.
- Lena: selected Ines in R2; F enacted; account unverified.
Open questions:
- Boris: exact R1 draw/discard/pass; unanswered.
- Lena: exact R2 receipt/discard; unanswered.
- Ines: exact R2 receipt/discard/rationale; unanswered.
Already said:
- R2 scrutiny narrowed to Lena/Ines/draw; requested exact reports/comparison.
- Flagged Ines discard/rationale and Lena account.
- No objection to Lena/Ines absent concrete evidence.
- Asked Rosa fallback before vote; Rosa fixed Greta and promised full draw report.
- Noted Ines's Boris promise request is not evidence.
- Asked Boris about R1 hand quality; unanswered.
- Boris committed to enact Liberal from mixed hand and report exact cards.
vote round 34s
Vote ja. Rosa made a fixed fallback commitment and promised to pass Boris a Liberal whenever available, while Boris committed to enact a Liberal from a mixed hand and report exactly. Boris's prior Liberal government is positive but not conclusive; this is a reasonable test government, and rejecting it without a concrete specific reason would risk an automatic policy after future failures.
Suspects:
- Lena/Ines: R2 F enacted; Lena claims 2F/1L, discarded F, passed F+L; Ines claims received 2F. Contradiction; culprit Lena, Ines, or draw.
- Lena: selected Ines in R2; F enacted; account unverified.
Open questions:
- Boris: exact R1 draw/discard/pass; unanswered.
- Lena: exact R2 receipt/discard; unanswered.
- Ines: exact R2 receipt/discard/rationale; unanswered.
- Rosa/Boris: exact current reports pending if government passes.
Already said:
- R2 scrutiny narrowed to Lena/Ines/draw; requested exact reports/comparison.
- Flagged Ines discard/rationale and Lena account.
- No objection to Lena/Ines absent concrete evidence.
- Asked Rosa fallback before vote; Rosa fixed Greta and promised full draw report.
- Noted Ines's Boris promise request is not evidence.
- Asked Boris about R1 hand quality; unanswered.
- Boris committed to enact Liberal from mixed hand and report exact cards.
- Voted Ja on Rosa-Boris as a reasonable test government.
bid round 33s
Suspects:
- Lena/Ines: R2 F enacted; Lena claims 2F/1L, discarded F, passed F+L; Ines claims received 2F. Contradiction; culprit Lena, Ines, or draw.
- Lena: selected Ines in R2; F enacted; account unverified.
- R3 Rosa/Boris enacted L: lowers suspicion of both, but does not clear them.
Open questions:
- Boris: exact R1 draw/discard/pass; unanswered.
- Lena: exact R2 receipt/discard; unanswered.
- Ines: exact R2 receipt/discard/rationale; unanswered.
- Rosa/Boris: exact current reports pending if government passes.
Already said:
- R2 scrutiny narrowed to Lena/Ines/draw; requested exact reports/comparison.
- Flagged Ines discard/rationale and Lena account.
- No objection to Lena/Ines absent concrete evidence.
- Asked Rosa fallback before vote; Rosa fixed Greta and promised full draw report.
- Noted Ines's Boris promise request is not evidence.
- Asked Boris about R1 hand quality; unanswered.
- Boris committed to enact Liberal from mixed hand and report exact cards.
- Voted Ja on Rosa-Boris as a reasonable test government.
speak round 34s
No new point to add; Boris's exact discard has already been requested, and repeating it would violate the instruction.
Suspects:
- Lena/Ines: R2 F; Lena claims 2F+L then passed F+L, Ines claims 2F; contradiction, culprit Lena/Ines/draw.
- Lena: selected Ines in R2; F outcome; account unverified.
- Rosa/Boris: R3 L lowers suspicion, not clearance.
Open questions:
- Boris: exact R1 draw/discard/pass; unanswered.
- Lena: exact R2 receipt/discard; unanswered.
- Ines: exact R2 receipt/discard/rationale; unanswered.
- Boris: exact R3 discard; Rosa just requested, pending.
Already said:
- R2 scrutiny narrowed to Lena/Ines/draw; requested exact reports.
- Flagged Ines discard/rationale and Lena account.
- No objection to Lena/Ines absent evidence.
- Asked Rosa fallback; she fixed Greta and promised report.
- Noted Ines's Boris promise request not evidence.
- Asked Boris about R1 hand; unanswered.
- Boris committed mixed-hand Liberal handling/report.
- Voted Ja on Rosa-Boris test government.
speak round 34s
No new point to add; Boris's exact discard has already been requested and remains unanswered, so I should not repeat it.
Suspects:
- Lena/Ines: R2 F; Lena claims 2F+L then passed F+L, Ines claims 2F; contradiction, culprit Lena/Ines/draw.
- Lena: selected Ines in R2; F outcome; account unverified.
- Rosa/Boris: R3 L lowers suspicion, not clearance.
Open questions:
- Boris: exact R1 draw/discard/pass; unanswered.
- Lena: exact R2 receipt/discard; unanswered.
- Ines: exact R2 receipt/discard/rationale; unanswered.
- Boris: exact R3 discard; Rosa requested, pending.
Already said:
- R2 scrutiny narrowed to Lena/Ines/draw; requested exact reports.
- Flagged Ines discard/rationale and Lena account.
- No objection to Lena/Ines absent evidence.
- Asked Rosa fallback; she fixed Greta and promised report.
- Noted Ines's Boris promise request not evidence.
- Asked Boris about R1 hand; unanswered.
- Boris committed mixed-hand Liberal handling/report.
- Voted Ja on Rosa-Boris test government.
bid round 43s
Suspects:
- Lena/Ines: R2 F; Lena claims 2F+L then passed F+L, Ines claims 2F; contradiction, culprit Lena/Ines/draw.
- Lena: selected Ines in R2; F outcome; account unverified.
- Rosa/Boris: R3 L lowers suspicion, not clearance.
Open questions:
- Boris: exact R1 draw/discard/pass; unanswered.
- Lena: exact R2 receipt/discard; unanswered.
- Ines: exact R2 receipt/discard/rationale; unanswered.
- Boris: exact R3 discard; Rosa requested, pending.
Already said:
- R2 scrutiny narrowed to Lena/Ines/draw; requested exact reports.
- Flagged Ines discard/rationale and Lena account.
- No objection to Lena/Ines absent evidence.
- Asked Rosa fallback; she fixed Greta and promised report.
- Noted Ines's Boris promise request not evidence.
- Asked Boris about R1 hand; unanswered.
- Boris committed mixed-hand Liberal handling/report.
- Voted Ja on Rosa-Boris test government.
speak round 44s
Ines is current President and was Chancellor in the only Fascist-enacting government. Ask for a concrete nominee and fallback before action, emphasizing unresolved accountability without rehashing prior statements.
Suspects:
- Lena/Ines: R2 F; Lena claims 2F+L then passed F+L, Ines account unresolved; culprit Lena/Ines/draw.
- Lena: selected Ines in R2; F outcome; account unverified.
- Rosa/Boris: R3 L lowers suspicion, not clearance.
Open questions:
- Boris: exact R1 draw/discard/pass; unanswered.
- Lena: exact R2 receipt/discard; unanswered.
- Ines: exact R2 receipt/discard/rationale; unanswered.
- Boris: exact R3 discard; Rosa requested, pending.
Already said:
- R2 scrutiny narrowed to Lena/Ines/draw; requested exact reports.
- Flagged Ines discard/rationale and Lena account.
- No objection to Lena/Ines absent evidence.
- Asked Rosa fallback; she fixed Greta and promised report.
- Noted Ines's Boris promise request not evidence.
- Asked Boris about R1 hand; unanswered.
- Boris committed mixed-hand Liberal handling/report.
- Voted Ja on Rosa-Boris test government.
- Asked Ines to name nominee and fixed fallback before nomination.
bid round 45s
Suspects:
- Lena/Ines: R2 Fascist; Lena claims 2F+L, passed F+L; culprit Lena/Ines/draw unresolved.
- Lena: selected Ines in R2; Fascist outcome; hand account unverified.
- Rosa/Boris: R3 Liberal lowers suspicion, not clearance.
Open questions:
- Boris: exact R1 draw/discard/pass; unanswered.
- Lena: exact R2 receipt/discard; unanswered.
- Ines: exact R2 receipt/discard/rationale; unanswered.
- Boris: exact R3 discard; Rosa requested, pending.
- Greta: precommitment and post-government exact report pending.
Already said:
- R2 scrutiny narrowed to Lena/Ines/draw; requested exact reports.
- Flagged Ines discard/rationale and Lena account.
- No objection to Lena/Ines absent evidence.
- Asked Rosa fallback; she fixed Greta and promised report.
- Noted Ines's Boris promise request is not evidence.
- Asked Boris about R1 hand; unanswered.
- Boris committed mixed-hand Liberal handling/report.
- Voted Ja on Rosa-Boris test government.
- Asked Ines nominee and fixed fallback before nomination.
- Ines committed Greta, Otto fallback.
bid round 44s
Suspects:
- Lena/Ines: R2 Fascist; Lena claims 2F+L, passed F+L; culprit Lena/Ines/draw unresolved.
- Lena: selected Ines in R2; Fascist outcome; hand account unverified.
- Rosa/Boris: R3 Liberal lowers suspicion, not clearance.
Open questions:
- Boris: exact R1 draw/discard/pass; unanswered.
- Lena: exact R2 receipt/discard; unanswered.
- Ines: exact R2 receipt/discard/rationale; unanswered.
- Boris: exact R3 discard; Rosa requested, pending.
- Greta: commitment before nomination and exact post-government report pending.
Already said:
- R2 scrutiny narrowed to Lena/Ines/draw; requested exact reports.
- Flagged Ines discard/rationale and Lena account.
- No objection to Lena/Ines absent evidence.
- Asked Rosa fallback; she fixed Greta and promised report.
- Noted Ines's Boris promise request is not evidence.
- Asked Boris about R1 hand; unanswered.
- Boris committed mixed-hand Liberal handling/report.
- Voted Ja on Rosa-Boris test government.
- Asked Ines nominee and fixed fallback before nomination.
- Ines committed Greta, Otto fallback.
- Request Greta's pre-nomination commitment on mixed L/F hand.
bid round 44s
Suspects:
- Lena/Ines: R2 Fascist; Lena claims 2F+L, passed F+L; culprit Lena/Ines/draw unresolved.
- Lena: selected Ines in R2; Fascist outcome; hand account unverified.
- Rosa/Boris: R3 Liberal lowers suspicion, not clearance.
Open questions:
- Boris: exact R1 draw/discard/pass; unanswered.
- Lena: exact R2 receipt/discard; unanswered.
- Ines: exact R2 receipt/discard/rationale; unanswered.
- Boris: exact R3 discard; Rosa requested, pending.
- Greta: exact post-government report pending; committed to report and discard F when mixed L/F.
Already said:
- R2 scrutiny narrowed to Lena/Ines/draw; requested exact reports.
- Flagged Ines discard/rationale and Lena account.
- No objection to Lena/Ines absent evidence.
- Asked Rosa fallback; she fixed Greta and promised report.
- Noted Ines's Boris promise request is not evidence.
- Asked Boris about R1 hand; unanswered.
- Boris committed mixed-hand Liberal handling/report.
- Voted Ja on Rosa-Boris test government.
- Asked Ines nominee and fixed fallback before nomination.
- Ines committed Greta, Otto fallback.
- Requested Greta pre-nomination commitment on mixed L/F hand.
- Greta now committed to exact post-government report and mixed-hand discard rule.
bid round 44s
Suspects:
- Lena/Ines: R2 Fascist; Lena claims 2F+L, passed F+L; culprit Lena/Ines/draw unresolved.
- Lena: selected Ines in R2; Fascist outcome; hand account unverified.
- Rosa/Boris: R3 Liberal lowers suspicion, not clearance.
Open questions:
- Boris: exact R1 draw/discard/pass; unanswered.
- Lena: exact R2 receipt/discard; unanswered.
- Ines: exact R2 receipt/discard/rationale; unanswered.
- Boris: exact R3 discard; Rosa requested, pending.
- Greta: post-government report pending until government acts; committed to report and discard F when mixed L/F.
Already said:
- R2 scrutiny narrowed to Lena/Ines/draw; requested exact reports.
- Flagged Ines discard/rationale and Lena account.
- No objection to Lena/Ines absent evidence.
- Asked Rosa fallback; she fixed Greta and promised report.
- Noted Ines's Boris promise request is not evidence.
- Asked Boris about R1 hand; unanswered.
- Boris committed mixed-hand Liberal handling/report.
- Voted Ja on Rosa-Boris test government.
- Asked Ines nominee and fixed fallback before nomination.
- Ines committed Greta, Otto fallback.
- Requested Greta pre-nomination commitment on mixed L/F hand.
- Greta committed to exact post-government report and mixed-hand discard rule.
- Current stance: scrutinize Ines/Greta's report against enacted outcome; R2 remains unresolved.
vote round 45s
Vote Ja. Greta has no policy record and made a concrete reporting commitment; Ines's Round 2 Fascist government remains suspicious, but this government is a useful test and there is no specific evidence Greta is fascist. The election tracker is 0, so a failed vote would not immediately force a policy, but rejecting a clean nominee without concrete grounds is unjustified.
Suspects:
- Lena/Ines: R2 Fascist; Lena selected Ines; exact accounts unresolved.
- Lena: R2 President, Fascist enacted; hand/report unverified.
- Ines: R2 Chancellor, Fascist enacted; exact receipt/discard/rationale unanswered.
- Rosa/Boris: R3 Liberal lowers suspicion, not clearance.
Open questions:
- Boris: exact R1 draw/discard/pass; unanswered.
- Lena/Ines: exact R2 cards and forced-vs-mixed explanation; unanswered.
- Boris: exact R3 discard; Rosa requested, pending.
- Greta: post-government exact report pending; committed mixed L/F handling.
Already said:
- R2 Fascist narrowed to Lena/Ines/draw; requested exact reports.
- Asked Boris about R1 hand; unanswered.
- Voted Ja on Rosa-Boris test.
- Asked Ines for nominee/fallback; Ines committed Greta, Otto fallback.
- Greta committed exact post-government report and mixed-hand discard rule.
- Voting Ja on Ines-Greta: Greta clean record, concrete commitment; Ines remains under scrutiny.
bid round 43s
Suspects:
- Lena/Ines: R2 Fascist; Lena selected Ines; exact accounts unresolved.
- Lena: R2 President, Fascist enacted; hand/report unverified.
- Ines: R2 Chancellor, Fascist enacted; exact receipt/discard/rationale unanswered.
- Rosa/Boris: R3 Liberal lowers suspicion, not clearance.
Open questions:
- Boris: exact R1 draw/discard/pass; unanswered.
- Lena/Ines: exact R2 cards and forced-vs-mixed explanation; unanswered.
- Boris: exact R3 discard; Rosa requested, pending.
- Greta: post-government exact report pending; committed mixed L/F handling.
Already said:
- R2 Fascist narrowed to Lena/Ines/draw; requested exact reports.
- Asked Boris about R1 hand; unanswered.
- Voted Ja on Rosa-Boris test.
- Asked Ines for nominee/fallback; Ines committed Greta, Otto fallback.
- Greta committed exact post-government report and mixed-hand discard rule.
- Voting Ja on Ines-Greta: Greta clean record, concrete commitment; Ines remains under scrutiny.
bid round 45s
Suspects:
- Ines: R2 Chancellor and R4 President in Fascist enactments; only player in both Fascist governments; exact R2/R4 accounts unresolved.
- Lena: R2 President with Fascist enactment; hand/report unverified.
- Greta: R4 Chancellor with Fascist enactment; exact report pending, but no prior suspicious government.
- Rosa/Boris: R3 Liberal lowers suspicion, not clearance.
Open questions:
- Ines: exact R2 cards, discard, passage; exact R4 draw, discard, and cards passed.
- Greta: exact R4 received cards, discard, and enacted card.
- Lena: exact R2 draw/discard/pass.
- Boris: exact R1 draw/discard/pass; R3 discard answer pending.
Already said:
- R2 Fascist narrowed to Lena/Ines/draw; requested exact reports.
- Asked Boris about R1 hand; unanswered.
- Voted Ja on Rosa-Boris test.
- Asked Ines for nominee/fallback; Ines committed Greta, Otto fallback.
- Greta committed exact post-government report and mixed-hand discard rule.
- Voted Ja on Ines-Greta due to Greta clean record and commitment; Ines remains under scrutiny.
- Nadia identified Ines as only player in both Fascist governments.
bid round 45s
Suspects:
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in Fascist enactments; only player in both; R4 account directly conflicts with Greta's.
- Greta: R4 Chancellor; claims Ines passed 2F, while Ines claims 1L/1F; one is lying.
- Lena: R2 President during Fascist enactment; hand/report unverified.
- Rosa/Boris: R3 Liberal lowers suspicion, not clearance.
Open questions:
- Ines: exact R2 cards/discard/pass; R4 draw, discard, exact pass (claims 2L/1F, discarded L, passed L/F).
- Greta: exact R4 received cards/discard (claims 2F, discarded F) and why account conflicts.
- Lena: exact R2 draw/discard/pass.
- Boris: R1 draw/discard/pass; R3 discard answer pending.
Already said:
- R2 Fascist narrowed to Lena/Ines/draw; requested exact reports.
- Asked Boris R1 hand; unanswered.
- Voted Ja on Rosa-Boris test.
- Asked Ines nominee/fallback; Ines committed Greta, Otto fallback.
- Greta committed exact post-government report and mixed-hand discard rule.
- Voted Ja on Ines-Greta due to Greta clean record and commitment; Ines remains under scrutiny.
- Nadia identified Ines as only player in both Fascist governments.
- Now note: Ines and Greta give mutually exclusive R4 accounts; outcome implicates President, Chancellor, or unlucky draw.
bid round 43s
Suspects/evidence:
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in Fascist enactments; only player in both. R4 account conflicts with Greta's.
- Greta: R4 Chancellor; claims Ines passed 2F, while Ines claims 1L/1F. One account false; R4 culprits are Ines, Greta, or draw.
- Lena: R2 President during Fascist enactment; exact account unverified.
- Rosa/Boris: R3 Liberal lowers suspicion, not clearance.
Open questions unanswered:
- Ines: exact R2 cards/discard/pass; R4 draw, discard, exact pass.
- Greta: exact R4 received cards/discard and basis for 2F account.
- Lena: exact R2 draw/discard/pass.
- Boris: R1 draw/discard/pass; R3 discard answer.
Already said aloud:
- R2 Fascist narrowed to Lena/Ines/draw; requested exact reports.
- Asked Boris R1 hand; unanswered.
- Voted Ja on Rosa-Boris test.
- Asked Ines nominee/fallback; Ines committed Greta, Otto fallback.
- Greta committed exact post-government report and mixed-hand discard rule.
- Voted Ja on Ines-Greta due to Greta clean record; Ines remains under scrutiny.
- Nadia identified Ines as only player in both Fascist governments.
- Noted mutually exclusive Ines/Greta R4 accounts and three possible culprits.
bid round 45s
Suspects/evidence:
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in Fascist enactments; only player in both. R4 account conflicts with Greta’s.
- Greta: R4 Chancellor; claims Ines passed 2F, while Ines claims 1L/1F. One account false; R4 culprits are Ines, Greta, or draw.
- Lena: R2 President during Fascist enactment; exact account unverified; now endorses Greta conditionally.
- Rosa/Boris: R3 Liberal lowers suspicion, not clearance.
Open questions unanswered:
- Ines: exact R2 cards/discard/pass; R4 draw, discard, exact pass.
- Greta: exact R4 received cards/discard and basis for 2F account.
- Lena: exact R2 draw/discard/pass.
- Boris: R1 draw/discard/pass; R3 discard answer.
Already said aloud:
- R2 Fascist narrowed to Lena/Ines/draw; requested exact reports.
- Asked Boris R1 hand; unanswered.
- Voted Ja on Rosa-Boris test.
- Asked Ines nominee/fallback; Ines committed Greta, Otto fallback.
- Greta committed exact post-government report and mixed-hand discard rule.
- Voted Ja on Ines-Greta due to Greta clean record; Ines remains under scrutiny.
- Nadia identified Ines as only player in both Fascist governments.
- Noted mutually exclusive Ines/Greta R4 accounts and three possible culprits.
- Lena’s conditional defense of Greta does not establish Greta’s account; demand exact R4 transfer from Ines.
bid round 45s
Suspects/evidence:
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in Fascist enactments; only player in both. R4 account conflicts with Greta’s.
- Greta: R4 Chancellor; claims Ines passed 2F, while Ines claims 1L/1F. One account false or draw implicated; R4 culprits limited to Ines, Greta, draw.
- Lena: R2 President during Fascist enactment; exact account unverified; conditional defense of Greta is not proof.
- Rosa/Boris: R3 Liberal lowers suspicion, not clearance.
Open questions unanswered:
- Ines: exact R2 cards/discard/pass; R4 draw, discard, exact pass.
- Greta: exact R4 received cards/discard and basis for 2F account.
- Lena: exact R2 draw/discard/pass.
- Boris: R1 draw/discard/pass; R3 discard answer.
Already said aloud:
- R2 Fascist narrowed to Lena/Ines/draw; requested exact reports.
- Asked Boris R1 hand; unanswered.
- Voted Ja on Rosa-Boris test.
- Asked Ines nominee/fallback; Ines committed Greta, Otto fallback.
- Greta committed exact post-government report and mixed-hand discard rule.
- Voted Ja on Ines-Greta due to Greta clean record; Ines remains under scrutiny.
- Nadia identified Ines as only player in both Fascist governments.
- Noted mutually exclusive Ines/Greta R4 accounts and three possible culprits.
- Demanded exact R4 transfer from Ines; Lena’s conditional defense does not establish Greta’s account.
bid round 44s
Suspects/evidence:
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in Fascist enactments; only player in both. R4 account conflicts with Greta’s.
- Greta: R4 Chancellor; claims Ines passed 2F, while Ines claims 1L/1F. One account false or draw implicated; R4 culprits limited to Ines, Greta, draw.
- Lena: R2 President during Fascist enactment; exact account unverified; conditional defense of Greta not proof.
- Rosa/Boris: R3 Liberal lowers suspicion, not clearance.
Open questions unanswered:
- Ines: exact R2 cards/discard/pass; R4 draw, discard, exact pass.
- Greta: exact R4 received cards/discard and basis for 2F account.
- Lena: exact R2 draw/discard/pass.
- Boris: R1 draw/discard/pass; R3 discard answer.
Already said aloud:
- R2 Fascist narrowed to Lena/Ines/draw; requested exact reports.
- Asked Boris R1 hand; unanswered.
- Voted Ja on Rosa-Boris test.
- Asked Ines nominee/fallback; Ines committed Greta, Otto fallback.
- Greta committed exact post-government report and mixed-hand discard rule.
- Voted Ja on Ines-Greta due to Greta clean record; Ines remains under scrutiny.
- Nadia identified Ines as only player in both Fascist governments.
- Noted mutually exclusive Ines/Greta R4 accounts and three possible culprits.
- Demanded exact R4 transfer from Ines; Lena’s conditional defense does not establish Greta’s account.
bid round 44s
Suspects/evidence:
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in Fascist enactments; only player in both. R4 account conflicts with Greta’s. R4 culprits limited to Ines, Greta, draw.
- Greta: R4 Chancellor; claims Ines passed 2F, while Ines claims 1L/1F. One account false or draw implicated.
- Lena: R2 President during Fascist enactment; exact account unverified; conditional defense of Greta not proof.
- Rosa/Boris: R3 Liberal lowers suspicion, not clearance.
Open questions unanswered:
- Ines: exact R2 cards/discard/pass; R4 draw, discard, exact pass.
- Greta: exact R4 received cards/discard and basis for 2F account.
- Lena: exact R2 draw/discard/pass.
- Boris: R1 draw/discard/pass; R3 discard answer.
Already said aloud:
- R2 Fascist narrowed to Lena/Ines/draw; requested exact reports.
- Asked Boris R1 hand; unanswered.
- Voted Ja on Rosa-Boris test.
- Asked Ines nominee/fallback; Ines committed Greta, Otto fallback.
- Greta committed exact post-government report and mixed-hand discard rule.
- Voted Ja on Ines-Greta due to Greta clean record; Ines remains under scrutiny.
- Nadia identified Ines as only player in both Fascist governments.
- Noted mutually exclusive Ines/Greta R4 accounts and three possible culprits.
- Demanded exact R4 transfer from Ines; Lena’s conditional defense does not establish Greta’s account.
bid round 44s
Suspects/evidence:
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in Fascist enactments; only player in both. R4 account conflicts with Greta’s. R4 culprits: Ines, Greta, draw.
- Greta: R4 Chancellor; says Ines passed 2F, while Ines says 1L/1F. One account false or draw implicated.
- Lena: R2 President during Fascist enactment; exact account unverified; defense of Greta conditional, not proof.
- Rosa/Boris: R3 Liberal, lowers suspicion, not clearance.
Open questions unanswered:
- Ines: exact R2 cards/discard/pass; R4 draw, discard, exact pass.
- Greta: exact R4 received cards/discard and basis for 2F account.
- Lena: exact R2 draw/discard/pass.
- Boris: R1 draw/discard/pass; R3 discard answer.
Already said aloud:
- R2 Fascist narrowed to Lena/Ines/draw; requested exact reports.
- Asked Boris R1 hand; unanswered.
- Voted Ja on Rosa-Boris test.
- Asked Ines nominee/fallback; Ines committed Greta, Otto fallback.
- Greta committed exact post-government report and mixed-hand discard rule.
- Voted Ja on Ines-Greta due to Greta clean record; Ines remains under scrutiny.
- Nadia identified Ines as only player in both Fascist governments.
- Noted mutually exclusive Ines/Greta R4 accounts and three possible culprits.
- Demanded exact R4 transfer from Ines; Lena’s conditional defense does not establish Greta’s account.
bid round 46s
Suspects/evidence:
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in Fascist enactments; only player in both. R4 accounts conflict with Greta’s. R4 culprits: Ines, Greta, draw.
- Greta: R4 Chancellor; says Ines passed 2F, while Ines says 1L/1F. One account false or draw implicated.
- Lena: R2 President during Fascist enactment; exact account unverified; defense of Greta conditional.
- Rosa/Boris: R3 Liberal, lowers suspicion, not clearance.
Open questions unanswered:
- Ines: exact R2 cards/discard/pass; R4 draw, discard, exact pass.
- Greta: exact R4 received cards/discard and basis for 2F account.
- Lena: exact R2 draw/discard/pass.
- Boris: R1 draw/discard/pass; R3 discard answer.
Already said aloud:
- R2 Fascist narrowed to Lena/Ines/draw; requested exact reports.
- Asked Boris R1 hand; unanswered.
- Voted Ja on Rosa-Boris test.
- Asked Ines nominee/fallback; Ines committed Greta, Otto fallback.
- Greta committed exact post-government report and mixed-hand discard rule.
- Voted Ja on Ines-Greta due to Greta clean record; Ines remains under scrutiny.
- Nadia identified Ines as only player in both Fascist governments.
- Noted mutually exclusive Ines/Greta R4 accounts and three possible culprits.
- Demanded exact R4 transfer from Ines; Lena’s conditional defense does not establish Greta’s account.
- Willing to be investigated; investigation result does not resolve R4 Ines/Greta contradiction or Ines’s repeated involvement.
bid round 47s
Suspects/evidence:
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in Fascist enactments; only player in both. R4 accounts conflict with Greta’s. R4 culprits: Ines, Greta, draw.
- Greta: R4 Chancellor; says Ines passed 2F, while Ines says 1L/1F. One account false or draw implicated.
- Lena: R2 President during Fascist enactment; exact account unverified; defense of Greta conditional.
- Rosa/Boris: R3 Liberal, lowers suspicion, not clearance.
Open questions unanswered:
- Ines: exact R2 cards/discard/pass; R4 draw, discard, exact pass.
- Greta: exact R4 received cards/discard and basis for 2F account.
- Lena: exact R2 draw/discard/pass.
- Boris: R1 draw/discard/pass; R3 discard answer.
Already said aloud:
- R2 Fascist narrowed to Lena/Ines/draw; requested exact reports.
- Asked Boris R1 hand; unanswered.
- Voted Ja on Rosa-Boris test.
- Asked Ines nominee/fallback; Ines committed Greta, Otto fallback.
- Greta committed exact post-government report and mixed-hand discard rule.
- Voted Ja on Ines-Greta due to Greta clean record; Ines remains under scrutiny.
- Nadia identified Ines as only player in both Fascist governments.
- Noted mutually exclusive Ines/Greta R4 accounts and three possible culprits.
- Demanded exact R4 transfer from Ines; Lena’s conditional defense does not establish Greta’s account.
- Willing to be investigated; investigation result does not resolve R4 Ines/Greta contradiction or Ines’s repeated involvement.
- Confirmed to Nadia: cast lone Nein on Ines-Greta.
speak round 47s
Nadia directly asked whether I cast the lone Nein; answer clearly. Add that investigating me will not resolve the R4 contradiction, though this has already been noted, so keep brief.
Suspects/evidence:
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in Fascist enactments; only player in both. R4 accounts conflict with Greta’s; repeated involvement strongest evidence.
- Greta: R4 Chancellor; says Ines passed 2F; Ines says 1L/1F. One account false or unlucky draw.
- Lena: R2 President during Fascist enactment; exact account unverified; defended Greta despite contradiction.
- Rosa/Boris: R3 Liberal enactment; not cleared.
Open unanswered:
- Ines: exact R2 cards/discard/pass; R4 draw, discard, exact pass.
- Greta: exact R4 received cards/discard; basis for 2F claim.
- Lena: exact R2 draw/discard/pass.
- Boris: R1 draw/discard/pass; R3 discard answer.
Already said:
- R2 Fascist narrowed to Lena/Ines/draw; demanded reports.
- Asked Boris R1 hand; unanswered.
- Voted Ja on Rosa-Boris test.
- Asked Ines nominee/fallback; Greta/ Otto fallback committed.
- Greta committed exact R4 report and mixed-hand rule.
- Voted Ja on Ines-Greta due to Greta clean record; Ines remains suspect.
- Identified mutually exclusive Ines/Greta R4 accounts and three possible culprits.
- Demanded exact R4 transfer from Ines; Lena’s defense insufficient.
- Investigation of Otto cannot resolve R4 contradiction or Ines’s repeated involvement.
- Confirmed casting lone Nein on Ines-Greta.
speak round 45s
The investigation result is still pending; request its immediate public report without repeating the broader R4 argument.
Suspects/evidence:
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in Fascist enactments; only player in both. R4 account conflicts with Greta’s; strongest repeated-government evidence.
- Greta: R4 Chancellor; claims 2F passed, conflicting with Ines’s 1L/1F account.
- Lena: R2 President during Fascist enactment; exact account unverified; defended Greta.
- Rosa/Boris: R3 Liberal government; not cleared.
Open unanswered:
- Ines: exact R2 cards/discard/pass; R4 draw, discard, exact pass.
- Greta: exact R4 received cards/discard; basis for 2F claim.
- Lena: exact R2 draw/discard/pass.
- Boris: R1 draw/discard/pass; R3 discard answer.
- Ines: report Otto investigation result.
Already said:
- R2 Fascist narrowed to Lena/Ines/draw; demanded reports.
- Asked Boris R1 hand; unanswered.
- Voted Ja on Rosa-Boris test.
- Asked Ines nominee/fallback; Greta/ Otto fallback committed.
- Greta committed exact R4 report and mixed-hand rule.
- Voted Ja on Ines-Greta; Ines remains suspect.
- Identified mutually exclusive Ines/Greta R4 accounts and three possible culprits.
- Demanded exact R4 transfer from Ines; Lena defense insufficient.
- Investigation of Otto cannot resolve R4 contradiction or Ines’s repeated involvement.
- Confirmed casting lone Nein on Ines-Greta.
speak round 46s
Directly press Lena for the unresolved Round 2 account, since her defense of Greta adds scrutiny but no card evidence.
Suspects/evidence:
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in Fascist enactments; only player in both. R4 account conflicts with Greta; strongest repeated-government evidence.
- Greta: R4 Chancellor; claims 2F passed, conflicts with Ines’s 1L/1F account.
- Lena: R2 President during Fascist enactment; exact account unverified; defended Greta.
- Rosa/Boris: R3 Liberal government; not cleared.
Open questions:
- Ines: exact R2 cards/discard/pass; R4 draw, discard, exact pass; Otto investigation result.
- Greta: exact R4 received cards/discard; basis for 2F claim.
- Lena: exact R2 draw/discard/pass.
- Boris: R1 draw/discard/pass; R3 discard answer.
Already said:
- R2 Fascist narrowed to Lena/Ines/draw; demanded reports.
- Asked Boris R1 hand; unanswered.
- Voted Ja on Rosa-Boris test.
- Asked Ines nominee/fallback; Greta/Otto fallback committed.
- Greta committed exact R4 report and mixed-hand rule.
- Voted Ja on Ines-Greta; Ines remains suspect.
- Identified mutually exclusive Ines/Greta R4 accounts and three possible culprits.
- Demanded exact R4 transfer from Ines; Lena defense insufficient.
- Investigation of Otto cannot resolve R4 contradiction or Ines’s repeated involvement.
- Confirmed casting lone Nein on Ines-Greta.
- Now directly demanded Lena’s exact R2 card report.
bid round 45s
Suspects/evidence:
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in Fascist enactments; only player in both. R4 account conflicts with Greta; strongest repeated-government evidence.
- Greta: R4 Chancellor; claims 2F passed, conflicts with Ines’s 1L/1F account.
- Lena: R2 President during Fascist enactment; exact account unverified; defended Greta.
- Rosa/Boris: R3 Liberal government; not cleared.
Open questions/unanswered:
- Ines: exact R2 cards/discard/pass; R4 draw, discard, exact pass; investigation result on Otto.
- Greta: exact R4 received cards/discard; basis for 2F claim.
- Lena: exact R2 draw/discard/pass.
- Boris: R1 draw/discard/pass; R3 discard answer.
Already said:
- R2 Fascist narrowed to Lena/Ines/draw; demanded reports.
- Asked Boris R1 hand; unanswered.
- Voted Ja on Rosa-Boris test.
- Asked Ines nominee/fallback; Greta/Otto fallback committed.
- Greta committed exact R4 report and mixed-hand rule.
- Voted Ja on Ines-Greta; Ines remains suspect.
- Identified mutually exclusive Ines/Greta R4 accounts and three possible culprits.
- Demanded exact R4 transfer from Ines; Lena defense insufficient.
- Investigation of Otto cannot resolve R4 contradiction or Ines’s repeated involvement.
- Confirmed lone Nein on Ines-Greta.
- Demanded Lena’s exact R2 card report.
bid round 56s
Suspects/evidence:
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in Fascist enactments; only player in both. R4 account conflicts with Greta; strongest repeated-government evidence.
- Greta: R4 Chancellor; claims 2F passed, conflicts with Ines’s 1L/1F account.
- Lena: R2 President during Fascist enactment; exact account unverified; defended Greta.
- Rosa/Boris: R3 Liberal government; not cleared.
Open questions/unanswered:
- Ines: exact R2 cards/discard/pass; R4 draw, discard, exact pass; investigation result on Otto.
- Greta: exact R4 received cards/discard; basis for 2F claim; intended nominee/fallback.
- Lena: exact R2 draw/discard/pass.
- Boris: R1 draw/discard/pass; R3 discard answer.
Already said:
- R2 Fascist narrowed to Lena/Ines/draw; demanded reports.
- Asked Boris R1 hand; unanswered.
- Voted Ja on Rosa-Boris test.
- Asked Ines nominee/fallback; Greta/Otto fallback committed.
- Greta committed exact R4 report and mixed-hand rule.
- Voted Ja on Ines-Greta; Ines remains suspect.
- Identified mutually exclusive Ines/Greta R4 accounts and three possible culprits.
- Demanded exact R4 transfer from Ines; Lena defense insufficient.
- Investigation of Otto cannot resolve R4 contradiction or Ines’s repeated involvement.
- Confirmed lone Nein on Ines-Greta.
- Demanded Lena’s exact R2 card report.
- Before this nomination, urged Greta to choose nominee/fallback outside R4 pair.
speak round 55s
Ines still owes the publicly promised investigation result, and it should be stated before Greta nominates. This is a direct accountability point, though similar requests were made earlier; Lena has just raised it, so answer firmly but briefly.
Suspects/evidence:
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in Fascist enactments; only player in both; R4 account conflicts with Greta; still withholding promised Otto investigation result.
- Greta: R4 Chancellor; claims 2F passed, conflicts with Ines’s 1L/1F account.
- Lena: R2 President during Fascist enactment; exact account unverified; defended Greta.
- Rosa/Boris: R3 Liberal government; not cleared.
Open questions/unanswered:
- Ines: exact R2 cards/discard/pass; R4 draw/discard/exact pass; Otto investigation result.
- Greta: exact R4 received cards/discard; basis for 2F claim; intended nominee/fallback.
- Lena: exact R2 draw/discard/pass.
- Boris: R1 draw/discard/pass; R3 discard answer.
Already said:
- R2 Fascist narrowed to Lena/Ines/draw; demanded reports.
- Asked Boris R1 hand; unanswered.
- Voted Ja on Rosa-Boris test.
- Asked Ines nominee/fallback; Greta/Otto fallback committed.
- Greta committed exact R4 report and mixed-hand rule.
- Voted Ja on Ines-Greta; Ines remains suspect.
- Identified mutually exclusive Ines/Greta R4 accounts and three possible culprits.
- Demanded exact R4 transfer from Ines; Lena defense insufficient.
- Investigation of Otto cannot resolve R4 contradiction or Ines’s repeated involvement.
- Confirmed lone Nein on Ines-Greta.
- Demanded Lena’s exact R2 card report.
- Before nomination, urged Greta choose nominee/fallback outside R4 pair.
- Now demanded Ines report Otto result before nomination.
speak round 54s
Greta must commit to a nominee before acting, avoiding both disputed R4 players. This adds accountability without repeating my demand for Ines's investigation result.
Suspects/evidence:
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in Fascist governments; only player in both; R4 account conflicts with Greta; withholding promised Otto investigation result.
- Greta: R4 Chancellor; claims 2F passed, conflicts with Ines’s 1L/1F account.
- Lena: R2 President during Fascist enactment; exact account unverified; defended Greta.
- Rosa/Boris: R3 Liberal government; not cleared.
Open questions/unanswered:
- Ines: exact R2 cards/discard/pass; R4 draw/discard/exact pass; Otto investigation result.
- Greta: exact R4 received cards/discard; basis for 2F claim; nominee/fallback commitment.
- Lena: exact R2 draw/discard/pass.
- Boris: R1 draw/discard/pass; R3 discard answer.
Already said:
- R2 Fascist narrowed to Lena/Ines/draw; demanded reports.
- Asked Boris R1 hand; unanswered.
- Voted Ja on Rosa-Boris test.
- Asked Ines nominee/fallback; Greta/Otto fallback committed.
- Greta committed exact R4 report and mixed-hand rule.
- Voted Ja on Ines-Greta; Ines remains suspect.
- Identified mutually exclusive Ines/Greta R4 accounts and three possible culprits.
- Demanded exact R4 transfer from Ines; Lena defense insufficient.
- Investigation of Otto cannot resolve R4 contradiction or Ines’s repeated involvement.
- Confirmed lone Nein on Ines-Greta.
- Demanded Lena’s exact R2 card report.
- Urged Greta choose nominee/fallback outside R4 pair.
- Demanded Ines report Otto result before nomination.
- Now demanded Greta precommit nominee/fallback excluding Greta and Ines.
bid round 54s
Suspects/evidence:
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in Fascist governments; only player in both. R4 account conflicts with Greta; withholding promised Otto investigation result.
- Greta: R4 Chancellor; claims 2F passed, conflicts with Ines’s 1L/1F account.
- Lena: R2 President during Fascist enactment; exact account unverified; defended Greta.
- Rosa/Boris: R3 Liberal government; not cleared.
Open questions/unanswered:
- Ines: exact R2 cards/discard/pass; R4 draw/discard/exact pass; Otto investigation result.
- Greta: exact R4 received cards/discard; basis for 2F claim; nominee/fallback commitment.
- Lena: exact R2 draw/discard/pass.
- Boris: R1 draw/discard/pass; R3 discard answer.
Already said:
- R2 Fascist narrowed to Lena/Ines/draw; demanded reports.
- Asked Boris R1 hand; unanswered.
- Voted Ja on Rosa-Boris test.
- Asked Ines nominee/fallback; Greta/Otto fallback committed.
- Greta committed exact R4 report and mixed-hand rule.
- Voted Ja on Ines-Greta; Ines remains suspect.
- Identified mutually exclusive Ines/Greta R4 accounts and three possible culprits.
- Demanded exact R4 transfer from Ines; Lena defense insufficient.
- Investigation of Otto cannot resolve R4 contradiction or Ines’s repeated involvement.
- Confirmed lone Nein on Ines-Greta.
- Demanded Lena’s exact R2 card report.
- Urged Greta choose nominee/fallback outside R4 pair.
- Demanded Ines report Otto result before nomination.
- Demanded Greta precommit nominee/fallback excluding Greta and Ines.
bid round 511s
Suspects/evidence:
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in Fascist governments; only player in both. R4 account conflicts with Greta; withheld promised Otto investigation result.
- Greta: R4 Chancellor; claims 2F passed, conflicts with Ines’s 1L/1F account.
- Lena: R2 President during Fascist enactment; exact account unverified; defended Greta.
- Rosa/Boris: R3 Liberal government; not cleared.
Open questions/unanswered:
- Ines: exact R2 cards/discard/pass; R4 draw/discard/exact pass; Otto investigation result.
- Greta: exact R4 received cards/discard; basis for 2F claim; nominee/fallback commitment.
- Lena: exact R2 draw/discard/pass.
- Boris: R1 draw/discard/pass; R3 discard answer.
- Greta: precommit nominee/fallback excluding Greta and Ines.
Already said:
- R2 Fascist narrowed to Lena/Ines/draw; demanded reports.
- Asked Boris R1 hand; unanswered.
- Voted Ja on Rosa-Boris test.
- Asked Ines nominee/fallback; Greta/Otto fallback committed.
- Greta committed exact R4 report and mixed-hand rule.
- Voted Ja on Ines-Greta; Ines remains suspect.
- Identified mutually exclusive Ines/Greta R4 accounts and three possible culprits.
- Demanded exact R4 transfer from Ines; Lena defense insufficient.
- Investigation of Otto cannot resolve R4 contradiction or Ines’s repeated involvement.
- Confirmed lone Nein on Ines-Greta.
- Demanded Lena’s exact R2 card report.
- Urged Greta choose nominee/fallback outside R4 pair.
- Demanded Ines report Otto result before nomination.
- Demanded Greta precommit nominee/fallback excluding Greta and Ines.
bid round 57s
Suspects/evidence:
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in Fascist governments; only player in both. R4 account conflicts with Greta; withheld promised Otto investigation result.
- Greta: R4 Chancellor; claims 2F passed, conflicts with Ines’s 1L/1F account.
- Lena: R2 President during Fascist enactment; exact account unverified; defended Greta.
- Rosa/Boris: R3 Liberal government; not cleared.
Open questions/unanswered:
- Ines: exact R2 cards/discard/pass; R4 draw/discard/exact pass; Otto investigation result.
- Greta: exact R4 received cards/discard; basis for 2F claim; nominee/fallback commitment.
- Lena: exact R2 draw/discard/pass.
- Boris: R1 draw/discard/pass; R3 discard answer.
- Greta: precommit nominee/fallback excluding Greta and Ines.
Already said:
- R2 Fascist narrowed to Lena/Ines/draw; demanded reports.
- Asked Boris R1 hand; unanswered.
- Voted Ja on Rosa-Boris test.
- Asked Ines nominee/fallback; Greta/Otto fallback committed.
- Greta committed exact R4 report and mixed-hand rule.
- Voted Ja on Ines-Greta; Ines remains suspect.
- Identified mutually exclusive Ines/Greta R4 accounts and three possible culprits.
- Demanded exact R4 transfer from Ines; Lena defense insufficient.
- Investigation of Otto cannot resolve R4 contradiction or Ines’s repeated involvement.
- Confirmed lone Nein on Ines-Greta.
- Demanded Lena’s exact R2 card report.
- Urged Greta choose nominee/fallback outside R4 pair.
- Demanded Ines report Otto result before nomination.
- Demanded Greta precommit nominee/fallback excluding Greta and Ines.
bid round 55s
Suspects/evidence:
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in Fascist governments; only player in both. R4 account conflicts with Greta; withheld promised Otto investigation result.
- Greta: R4 Chancellor; claims 2F passed, conflicts with Ines’s 1L/1F account.
- Lena: R2 President during Fascist enactment; exact account unverified; defended Greta.
- Rosa/Boris: R3 Liberal government; not cleared.
Open questions/unanswered:
- Ines: exact R2 cards/discard/pass; R4 draw/discard/exact pass; Otto investigation result.
- Greta: exact R4 received cards/discard; basis for 2F claim; nominee/fallback commitment.
- Lena: exact R2 draw/discard/pass.
- Boris: R1 draw/discard/pass; R3 discard answer.
- Rosa: precommit exact report of this government’s cards/discard/pass.
Already said:
- R2 Fascist narrowed to Lena/Ines/draw; demanded reports.
- Asked Boris R1 hand; unanswered.
- Voted Ja on Rosa-Boris test.
- Asked Ines nominee/fallback; Greta/Otto fallback committed.
- Greta committed exact R4 report and mixed-hand rule.
- Voted Ja on Ines-Greta; Ines remains suspect.
- Identified mutually exclusive Ines/Greta R4 accounts and three possible culprits.
- Demanded exact R4 transfer from Ines; Lena defense insufficient.
- Investigation of Otto cannot resolve R4 contradiction or Ines’s repeated involvement.
- Confirmed lone Nein on Ines-Greta.
- Demanded Lena’s exact R2 card report.
- Urged Greta choose nominee/fallback outside R4 pair.
- Demanded Ines report Otto result before nomination.
- Demanded Greta precommit nominee/fallback excluding Greta and Ines.
bid round 54s
Suspects/evidence:
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in Fascist governments; only player in both. R4 account conflicts with Greta; withheld promised Otto investigation result.
- Greta: R4 Chancellor; claims 2F passed, conflicts with Ines’s 1L/1F account; now promises exact report in Rosa government.
- Lena: R2 President during Fascist enactment; exact account unverified; defended Greta.
- Rosa/Boris: R3 Liberal government; not cleared.
Open questions/unanswered:
- Ines: exact R2 cards/discard/pass; R4 draw/discard/exact pass; Otto investigation result.
- Greta: exact R4 received cards/discard; basis for 2F claim; nominee/fallback commitment; must report this government exactly.
- Rosa: precommit full draw/discard/pass report and fallback behavior.
- Lena: exact R2 draw/discard/pass.
- Boris: R1 draw/discard/pass; R3 discard answer.
Already said:
- R2 Fascist narrowed to Lena/Ines/draw; demanded reports.
- Asked Boris R1 hand; unanswered.
- Voted Ja on Rosa-Boris test.
- Asked Ines nominee/fallback; Greta/Otto fallback committed.
- Greta committed exact R4 report and mixed-hand rule.
- Voted Ja on Ines-Greta; Ines remains suspect.
- Identified mutually exclusive Ines/Greta R4 accounts and three possible culprits.
- Demanded exact R4 transfer from Ines; Lena defense insufficient.
- Investigation of Otto cannot resolve R4 contradiction or Ines’s repeated involvement.
- Confirmed lone Nein on Ines-Greta.
- Demanded Lena’s exact R2 card report.
- Urged Greta choose nominee/fallback outside R4 pair.
- Demanded Ines report Otto result before nomination.
- Demanded Greta precommit nominee/fallback excluding Greta and Ines.
speak round 56s
No genuinely new point to add; the unanswered reporting demands are already on the record, so I should not repeat them.
Suspects/evidence:
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in Fascist governments; only player in both. R4 account conflicts with Greta; withheld promised Otto investigation result.
- Greta: R4 Chancellor; claims 2F passed, conflicts with Ines’s 1L/1F account; exact R4 report still absent.
- Lena: R2 President during Fascist enactment; exact account unverified; defended Greta.
- Rosa/Boris: R3 Liberal government; not cleared.
Open questions/unanswered:
- Ines: exact R2 cards/discard/pass; R4 draw/discard/exact pass; Otto investigation result.
- Greta: exact R4 received cards/discard; basis for 2F claim; must report current government exactly.
- Rosa: precommit full draw/discard/pass report and fallback behavior.
- Lena: exact R2 draw/discard/pass.
- Boris: R1 draw/discard/pass; R3 discard answer.
Already said:
- R2 Fascist narrowed to Lena/Ines/draw; demanded reports.
- Asked Boris R1 hand; unanswered.
- Voted Ja on Rosa-Boris test.
- Asked Ines nominee/fallback; Greta/Otto fallback committed.
- Greta committed exact R4 report and mixed-hand rule.
- Voted Ja on Ines-Greta; Ines remains suspect.
- Identified mutually exclusive Ines/Greta R4 accounts and three possible culprits.
- Demanded exact R4 transfer from Ines; Lena defense insufficient.
- Investigation of Otto cannot resolve R4 contradiction or Ines’s repeated involvement.
- Confirmed lone Nein on Ines-Greta.
- Demanded Lena’s exact R2 card report.
- Urged Greta choose nominee/fallback outside R4 pair.
- Demanded Ines report Otto result before nomination.
- Demanded Greta precommit nominee/fallback excluding Greta and Ines.
speak round 56s
Rosa has not answered Boris's direct pre-vote commitment request. Press for a concrete commitment before voting; this is new and relevant.
Suspects/evidence:
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in Fascist governments; only player in both. R4 account conflicts with Greta; withheld promised Otto investigation result.
- Greta: R4 Chancellor; claims 2F passed, conflicts with Ines’s 1L/1F account; exact R4 report absent.
- Lena: R2 President during Fascist enactment; exact account unverified; defended Greta.
- Rosa/Boris: R3 Liberal governments; not cleared.
Open questions/unanswered:
- Ines: exact R2 cards/discard/pass; R4 draw/discard/exact pass; Otto investigation result.
- Greta: exact R4 received cards/discard; basis for 2F claim; current government report.
- Rosa: mixed-hand Liberal commitment and full draw/discard/pass report.
- Lena: exact R2 draw/discard/pass.
- Boris: R1 draw/discard/pass; R3 discard answer.
Already said:
- R2 Fascist narrowed to Lena/Ines/draw; demanded reports.
- Asked Boris R1 hand; unanswered.
- Voted Ja on Rosa-Boris test.
- Asked Ines nominee/fallback; Greta/Otto fallback committed.
- Greta committed exact R4 report and mixed-hand rule.
- Voted Ja on Ines-Greta; Ines remains suspect.
- Identified mutually exclusive Ines/Greta R4 accounts and three possible culprits.
- Demanded exact R4 transfer from Ines; Lena defense insufficient.
- Investigation of Otto cannot resolve R4 contradiction or Ines’s repeated involvement.
- Confirmed lone Nein on Ines-Greta.
- Demanded Lena’s exact R2 card report.
- Urged Greta choose nominee/fallback outside R4 pair.
- Demanded Ines report Otto result before nomination.
- Demanded Greta precommit nominee/fallback excluding Greta and Ines.
speak round 54s
Rosa's mixed-hand commitment was already asked directly and remains unanswered; repeating it would violate the instruction. Pass while preserving the unresolved accountability issue in notes.
Suspects/evidence:
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in Fascist governments; only player in both; R4 account conflicts with Greta; promised Otto investigation result withheld.
- Greta: R4 Chancellor; claims 2F passed, conflicts with Ines's 1L/1F claim; exact R4 report absent.
- Lena: R2 President during Fascist enactment; exact account unverified; defended Greta.
- Rosa/Boris: R3 Liberal governments; not cleared.
Open/unanswered:
- Ines: exact R2 cards/discard/pass; R4 draw/discard/pass; Otto investigation result.
- Greta: exact R4 received cards/discard; basis for 2F claim; current report.
- Rosa: mixed-hand Liberal commitment and full draw/discard/pass report.
- Lena: exact R2 draw/discard/pass.
- Boris: R1 draw/discard/pass; R3 discard.
Already said:
- R2 Fascist narrowed to Lena/Ines/draw; demanded reports.
- Asked Boris R1 hand; unanswered; voted Ja on Rosa-Boris test.
- Asked Ines nominee/fallback; Greta/Otto fallback committed.
- Greta committed exact R4 report and mixed-hand rule.
- Voted Ja on Ines-Greta; Ines remains suspect.
- Identified mutually exclusive Ines/Greta R4 accounts and three possible culprits.
- Demanded exact R4 transfer from Ines; Lena defense insufficient.
- Investigation of Otto cannot resolve R4 contradiction or Ines repeated involvement.
- Confirmed lone Nein on Ines-Greta.
- Demanded Lena exact R2 report.
- Urged Greta choose nominee/fallback outside R4 pair.
- Demanded Ines report Otto result before nomination.
- Demanded Greta precommit nominee/fallback excluding Greta/Ines.
- Rosa direct commitment question remains unanswered; do not repeat.
bid round 510s
Suspects/evidence:
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in Fascist governments; only player in both. R4 account conflicts with Greta; withheld Otto investigation result.
- Greta: R4 Chancellor; claims 2F conflicts with Ines's 1L/1F account; exact transfer absent.
- Lena: R2 President during F enactment; exact account unverified; defended Greta.
- Rosa/Boris: R3 Liberal governments; not cleared.
Open/unanswered:
- Ines: exact R2 cards/discard/pass; R4 draw/discard/pass; Otto result.
- Greta: exact R4 received cards/discard; basis for 2F claim; current report.
- Rosa: mixed-hand Liberal commitment and full draw/discard/pass report.
- Lena: exact R2 report.
- Boris: R1 report; R3 discard.
Already said:
- R2 F narrowed to Lena/Ines/draw; demanded reports.
- Asked Boris R1 hand; unanswered; voted Ja on Rosa-Boris.
- Asked Ines nominee/fallback; Greta/Otto fallback committed.
- Greta committed exact R4 report/mixed-hand rule.
- Voted Ja on Ines-Greta; Ines suspect; lone Nein.
- Identified mutually exclusive R4 accounts and three culprits.
- Demanded Ines R4 transfer; Lena defense insufficient.
- Investigation of Otto cannot resolve R4 contradiction/Ines repeated involvement.
- Demanded Lena R2 report.
- Urged Greta nominee/fallback outside R4 pair.
- Demanded Ines report Otto result before nomination.
- Demanded Greta precommit excluding Greta/Ines.
- Rosa direct commitment question remains unanswered.
vote round 56s
Ja. This government excludes Ines, the strongest repeated-government suspect, and Rosa was Chancellor in the Liberal Round 3 government. Greta remains implicated in Round 4, but rejecting this clean test with election tracker at 0 would risk an automatic policy later. Their exact card reports can be evaluated after enactment.
Suspects/evidence:
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in Fascist governments; only player in both; R4 account conflicts with Greta; withheld Otto investigation result.
- Greta: R4 Chancellor; claims 2F conflicts with Ines's 1L/1F account; exact transfer/report still absent.
- Lena: R2 President during F enactment; exact account unverified; defended Greta.
- Rosa/Boris: R3 Liberal government participants; not cleared.
Open/unanswered:
- Ines: exact R2 cards/discard/pass; R4 draw/discard/pass; Otto investigation result.
- Greta: exact R4 received cards/discard; current exact report after R5.
- Rosa: exact R5 draw/discard/pass after enactment.
- Lena: exact R2 report.
- Boris: R1 report; R3 discard.
Already said:
- R2 F narrowed to Lena/Ines/draw; demanded reports.
- Asked Boris R1 hand; unanswered; voted Ja on Rosa-Boris.
- Asked Ines nominee/fallback; Greta/Otto fallback committed.
- Greta committed exact R4 report/mixed-hand rule.
- Voted Ja on Ines-Greta; Ines suspect; cast lone Nein.
- Identified mutually exclusive R4 accounts and three culprits.
- Demanded Ines R4 transfer; Lena defense insufficient.
- Investigation of Otto cannot resolve R4 contradiction/Ines repeated involvement.
- Demanded Lena R2 report.
- Urged Greta nominee/fallback outside R4 pair.
- Demanded Ines report Otto result before nomination.
- Demanded Greta precommit excluding Greta/Ines.
- Asked Rosa to commit mixed-hand Liberal and full report; she committed.
bid round 58s
Suspects/evidence:
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in Fascist governments; only player in both. R4 account conflicts with Greta; withheld Otto investigation result.
- Greta: R4 Chancellor and R5 President in Fascist governments; R4 claims conflict with Ines; R5 now another F enactment.
- Rosa: R5 Chancellor in F government; exact transfer/pass report required.
- Lena: R2 President during F enactment; exact account unverified; defended Greta.
- Boris: R1/R3 liberal governments, not cleared.
- R5 F narrowed to Greta, Rosa, or unlucky draw; at 3F, Hitler-election danger.
Open/unanswered:
- Greta: exact R4 cards received/discard/pass; exact R5 draw, discard, and cards passed to Rosa.
- Rosa: exact R5 cards received, discard, and card passed.
- Ines: exact R2 cards/discard/pass; R4 draw/discard/pass; Otto investigation result.
- Lena: exact R2 report.
- Boris: R1 report; R3 discard.
Already said:
- R2 F narrowed to Lena/Ines/draw; demanded reports.
- Asked Boris R1 hand; unanswered; voted Ja on Rosa-Boris.
- Asked Ines nominee/fallback; Greta/Otto fallback committed.
- Greta committed exact R4 report/mixed-hand rule.
- Voted Ja on Ines-Greta; Ines suspect; cast lone Nein.
- Identified mutually exclusive R4 accounts and three culprits.
- Demanded Ines R4 transfer; Lena defense insufficient.
- Investigation of Otto cannot resolve R4 contradiction/Ines repeated involvement.
- Demanded Lena R2 report.
- Urged Greta nominee/fallback outside R4 pair.
- Demanded Ines report Otto result before nomination.
- Demanded Greta precommit excluding Greta/Ines.
- Asked Rosa to commit mixed-hand Liberal and full report; she committed.
speak round 58s
Demand the promised exact Round 5 reports, tying accountability to pre-vote commitments without repeating prior accusations.
Suspects/evidence:
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in Fascist governments; only player in both; R4 account conflicts with Greta; withheld Otto investigation result.
- Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President in Fascist governments; R4 account conflicts with Ines; R5 F enactment.
- Rosa: R5 Chancellor in F government; report now owed.
- Lena: R2 President during F enactment; exact account unverified; defended Greta.
- Boris: R1/R3 liberal governments; not cleared.
- R5 F narrowed to Greta, Rosa, or unlucky draw; 3F means Hitler-election danger.
Open questions:
- Greta: exact R4 cards/discard/pass; exact R5 draw/discard/pass to Rosa.
- Rosa: exact R5 draw/discard/pass.
- Ines: exact R2 cards/discard/pass; R4 draw/discard/pass; Otto investigation result.
- Lena: exact R2 report.
- Boris: R1 report; R3 discard.
Already said:
- R2 F narrowed to Lena/Ines/draw; demanded reports.
- Asked Boris R1 hand; unanswered; voted Ja on Rosa-Boris.
- Asked Ines nominee/fallback; Greta/Otto fallback committed.
- Greta committed exact R4 report/mixed-hand rule.
- Voted Ja on Ines-Greta; Ines suspect; cast lone Nein.
- Identified mutually exclusive R4 accounts and three culprits.
- Demanded Ines R4 transfer; Lena defense insufficient.
- Investigation of Otto cannot resolve R4 contradiction/Ines repeated involvement.
- Demanded Lena R2 report.
- Urged Greta nominee/fallback outside R4 pair.
- Demanded Ines report Otto result before nomination.
- Demanded Greta precommit excluding Greta/Ines.
- Asked Rosa mixed-hand Liberal/full report; she committed.
New: demanded Greta/Rosa exact R5 reports, citing their pre-vote promises.
speak round 56s
Need contribute without merely repeating the demand for exact reports. Greta's consecutive presence in R4 and R5 Fascist enactments is the strongest specific pattern, and the R4 contradiction remains unresolved. Make a concise accusation tied to both outcomes.
Suspects/evidence:
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in F governments; only player in both earlier F governments; R4 account conflicts with Greta; withheld Otto investigation result.
- Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President in consecutive F governments; R4 account conflicts with Ines; leading suspect.
- Rosa: R5 Chancellor in F government; exact report owed.
- Lena: R2 President during F; exact account unverified; defended Greta.
- Boris: R1/R3 liberal governments; not cleared.
- R5 F narrowed Greta/Rosa/draw; 3 F means Hitler-election danger.
Open questions:
- Greta: exact R4 and R5 draw/discard/pass reports.
- Rosa: exact R5 draw/discard/pass report.
- Ines: exact R2/R4 reports; Otto investigation result.
- Lena: exact R2 report.
- Boris: R1/R3 reports.
Already said:
- R2 F narrowed Lena/Ines/draw; demanded reports.
- Asked Boris R1 hand; unanswered; voted Ja on Rosa-Boris.
- Asked Ines nominee/fallback; Greta/Otto fallback committed.
- Greta committed exact R4 report/mixed rule.
- Voted Ja Ines-Greta; cast lone Nein; identified Ines/Greta contradiction and demanded transfer.
- Lena defense insufficient; investigation of Otto cannot resolve R4.
- Demanded Lena R2 report.
- Urged Greta nominee/fallback excluding Greta/Ines.
- Demanded Ines report Otto result before nomination.
- Asked Rosa mixed-hand Liberal/full report; committed.
- Demanded Greta/Rosa exact R5 reports.
- Now identified Greta as leading suspect from consecutive R4/R5 F governments plus R4 contradiction.
bid round 54s
Suspects/evidence:
- Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President in consecutive F governments; R4 account conflicts with Ines; leading suspect.
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in F governments; R4 contradiction with Greta; withheld Otto investigation result.
- Rosa: R5 Chancellor in F government; exact report owed.
- Lena: R2 President during F; account unverified; defended Greta.
- Boris: R1/R3 liberal governments; not cleared.
- R5 F narrowed Greta/Rosa/draw; 3 F means Hitler-election danger.
Open questions:
- Greta: exact R4/R5 draw, discard, pass reports.
- Rosa: exact R5 draw, discard, pass report.
- Ines: exact R2/R4 reports; Otto investigation result.
- Lena: exact R2 report.
- Boris: R1/R3 reports.
Already said:
- R2 F narrowed Lena/Ines/draw; demanded reports.
- Asked Boris R1 hand; unanswered; voted Ja on Rosa-Boris.
- Asked Ines nominee/fallback; Greta/Otto fallback committed.
- Greta committed exact R4 report/mixed rule.
- Voted Ja Ines-Greta; cast lone Nein; identified Ines/Greta contradiction; demanded transfer.
- Lena defense insufficient; Otto investigation cannot resolve R4.
- Demanded Lena R2 report.
- Urged Greta nominee/fallback excluding Greta/Ines.
- Demanded Ines report and Otto result before nomination.
- Asked Rosa mixed-hand Liberal/full report; committed.
- Demanded Greta/Rosa exact R5 reports.
- Identified Greta as leading suspect from consecutive R4/R5 F governments plus R4 contradiction.
bid round 54s
Suspects/evidence:
- Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President in consecutive F governments; R4 account conflicts with Ines; R5 account conflicts with Rosa; leading suspect.
- Rosa: R5 Chancellor; says Greta passed F-F, forcing F; exact account now conflicts with Greta.
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in F governments; R4 contradiction with Greta; withheld Otto investigation result.
- Lena: R2 President during F; account unverified; defended Greta.
- Boris: R1/R3 liberal governments; not cleared.
- R5 F narrowed Greta/Rosa/draw; 3 F means Hitler-election danger.
Open questions:
- Greta: reconcile R4/R5 exact draws, discards, passes; answer Rosa's F-F claim.
- Rosa: exact R5 draw/discard/pass report beyond claim of receiving F-F.
- Ines: exact R2/R4 reports; Otto investigation result.
- Lena: exact R2 report.
- Boris: R1/R3 reports.
Already said:
- R2 F narrowed Lena/Ines/draw; demanded reports.
- Asked Boris R1 hand; unanswered; voted Ja on Rosa-Boris.
- Asked Ines nominee/fallback; Greta/Otto fallback committed.
- Greta committed exact R4 report/mixed rule.
- Voted Ja Ines-Greta; cast lone Nein; identified Ines/Greta contradiction; demanded transfer.
- Lena defense insufficient; Otto investigation cannot resolve R4.
- Demanded Lena R2 report.
- Urged Greta nominee/fallback excluding Greta/Ines.
- Demanded Ines report and Otto result before nomination.
- Asked Rosa mixed-hand Liberal/full report; committed.
- Demanded Greta/Rosa exact R5 reports.
- Identified Greta as leading suspect from consecutive R4/R5 F governments plus R4 contradiction.
bid round 56s
Suspects/evidence:
- Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President in consecutive F governments; R4 account conflicts with Ines; R5 account conflicts with Rosa; leading suspect.
- Rosa: R5 Chancellor; says Greta passed F-F, exact account conflicts with Greta.
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in F governments; R4 contradiction with Greta; withheld Otto investigation result.
- Lena: R2 President during F; account unverified; defended Greta.
- R5 F narrowed Greta/Rosa/draw; 3 F means Hitler-election danger.
Open questions:
- Greta: reconcile R4/R5 exact draws, discards, passes; answer Rosa’s F-F claim.
- Rosa: exact R5 draw/discard/pass report beyond F-F claim.
- Ines: exact R2/R4 reports; Otto investigation result.
- Lena: exact R2 report.
- Boris: R1/R3 reports.
Already said:
- R2 F narrowed Lena/Ines/draw; demanded reports.
- Asked Boris R1 hand; unanswered; voted Ja on Rosa-Boris.
- Asked Ines nominee/fallback; Greta/Otto fallback committed.
- Greta committed exact R4 report/mixed rule.
- Voted Ja Ines-Greta; cast lone Nein; identified Ines/Greta contradiction; demanded transfer.
- Lena defense insufficient; Otto investigation cannot resolve R4.
- Demanded Lena R2 report.
- Urged Greta nominee/fallback excluding Greta/Ines.
- Demanded Ines report and Otto result before nomination.
- Asked Rosa mixed-hand Liberal/full report; committed.
- Demanded Greta/Rosa exact R5 reports.
- Identified Greta as leading suspect from consecutive R4/R5 F governments plus R4 contradiction.
- New: no government involving Greta or Rosa should be trusted until R5 hand claims reconcile.
bid round 54s
Suspects/evidence:
- Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President in consecutive F governments; R4 account conflicts with Ines; R5 account conflicts with Rosa; leading suspect.
- Rosa: R5 Chancellor; claims Greta passed F-F; conflicts with Greta.
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in F governments; R4 contradiction with Greta; withheld Otto investigation result.
- Lena: R2 President during F; account unverified; defended Greta.
- R5 F narrowed Greta/Rosa/draw; 3F means Hitler-election danger.
Open questions/unanswered:
- Greta: reconcile R4/R5 exact draws, discards, passes; answer Rosa's F-F claim.
- Rosa: exact R5 draw/discard/pass report beyond F-F claim.
- Ines: exact R2/R4 reports; Otto investigation result.
- Lena: exact R2 report.
- Boris: R1 hand report.
Already said:
- R2 F narrowed Lena/Ines/draw; demanded reports.
- Asked Boris R1 hand; unanswered; voted Ja on Rosa-Boris.
- Asked Ines nominee/fallback; Greta/Otto fallback committed.
- Greta committed exact R4 report/mixed rule.
- Voted Ja Ines-Greta; cast lone Nein; identified Ines/Greta contradiction; demanded transfer.
- Lena defense insufficient; Otto investigation cannot resolve R4.
- Demanded Lena R2 report.
- Urged Greta nominee/fallback excluding Greta/Ines.
- Demanded Ines report and Otto result before nomination.
- Asked Rosa mixed-hand Liberal/full report; committed.
- Demanded Greta/Rosa exact R5 reports.
- Identified Greta as leading suspect from consecutive R4/R5 F governments plus R4 contradiction.
- No government involving Greta or Rosa should be trusted until R5 claims reconcile.
bid round 56s
Suspects/evidence:
- Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President in consecutive F governments; R4 account conflicts with Ines; R5 says F-F-L, discarded F, passed F-L, conflicting with Rosa's F-F claim.
- Rosa: R5 Chancellor; claims Greta passed F-F; must reconcile exact cards.
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in F governments; R4 contradiction with Greta; withheld Otto investigation result.
- Lena: R2 President during F; account unverified; defended Greta.
- R5 F narrowed Greta/Rosa/draw; 3F creates Hitler-election danger.
Open questions/unanswered:
- Rosa: exact R5 draw/discard/pass; explain conflict with Greta.
- Greta: reconcile R4/R5 reports; answer Rosa's F-F claim.
- Ines: exact R2/R4 reports; Otto investigation result.
- Lena: exact R2 report.
- Boris: R1 hand report.
Already said:
- R2 F narrowed Lena/Ines/draw; demanded reports.
- Asked Boris R1 hand; unanswered; voted Ja on Rosa-Boris.
- Asked Ines nominee/fallback; Greta/Otto fallback committed.
- Greta committed exact R4 report/mixed rule.
- Voted Ja Ines-Greta; cast lone Nein; identified Ines/Greta contradiction; demanded transfer.
- Lena defense insufficient; Otto investigation cannot resolve R4.
- Demanded Lena R2 report.
- Urged Greta nominee/fallback excluding Greta/Ines.
- Demanded Ines report and Otto result before nomination.
- Asked Rosa mixed-hand Liberal/full report; committed.
- Demanded Greta/Rosa exact R5 reports.
- Identified Greta as leading suspect from consecutive R4/R5 F governments plus R4 contradiction.
- No government involving Greta or Rosa should be trusted until R5 claims reconcile.
speak round 56s
No unanswered direct question requires my response. I can add a clear conditional judgment: Rosa claims firsthand receipt of F-F, so if she maintains that claim, Greta's promised exact report is the falsified account and Greta should be excluded. This is a sharper decision rule rather than repeating the prior suspicion.
Suspects/evidence:
- Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President in consecutive F governments; R4 conflict with Ines; R5 says F-F-L, discarded F, passed F-L, conflicting with Rosa F-F claim.
- Rosa: R5 Chancellor; firsthand claims Greta passed F-F; conflicts with Greta.
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in F governments; R4 conflict with Greta; withheld Otto investigation result.
- Lena: R2 President during F; account unverified; defended Greta.
- R5 F narrowed Greta/Rosa/draw; 3F threshold danger.
Open questions/unanswered:
- Rosa: exact R5 draw/discard/pass; reconcile F-F claim.
- Greta: reconcile R4/R5 reports; answer Rosa F-F claim.
- Ines: exact R2/R4 reports; Otto investigation result.
- Lena: exact R2 report.
- Boris: R1 hand report.
Already said:
- R2 F narrowed Lena/Ines/draw; demanded reports.
- Asked Boris R1 hand; unanswered; voted Ja on Rosa-Boris.
- Asked Ines nominee/fallback; Greta/Otto fallback committed.
- Greta exact R4/mixed commitment.
- Voted Ja Ines-Greta; cast lone Nein; identified Ines/Greta contradiction; demanded transfer.
- Lena defense insufficient; Otto result cannot resolve R4.
- Demanded Lena R2 report.
- Urged Greta nominee/fallback excluding Greta/Ines.
- Demanded Ines result before nomination.
- Asked Rosa mixed-hand Liberal/full report.
- Demanded exact R5 reports; identified Greta leading suspect.
- Said exclude Greta/Rosa until R5 claims reconcile.
New: If Rosa maintains F-F firsthand claim, reject every future Greta government.
speak round 56s
Need add a genuinely new accountability question without repeating the R5 contradiction. The lone Nein on the R5 government is public but unidentified and may reveal informed suspicion; ask that voter to identify themselves and explain the pre-policy objection.
Suspects/evidence:
- Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President in consecutive F governments; R4 conflict with Ines; R5 report F-F-L, discarded F, passed F-L conflicts with Rosa's firsthand F-F.
- Rosa: R5 Chancellor; F-F claim conflicts with Greta; may be lying or victim of Greta.
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in F governments; R4 conflict with Greta; withheld Otto investigation result.
- Lena: R2 President during F; report unverified; defended Greta.
- R5 F narrowed Greta/Rosa/draw; Hitler threshold active.
Open questions:
- R5 lone Nein voter and reason — newly asked.
- Rosa exact R5 transfer/discard; reconcile F-F claim.
- Greta reconcile R4/R5 reports; answer Rosa F-F claim.
- Ines exact R2/R4 reports; Otto result.
- Lena exact R2 report; Boris R1 report.
Already said:
- R2 F narrowed Lena/Ines/draw; demanded reports.
- Asked Boris R1 hand; unanswered.
- Asked Ines nominee/fallback; Greta/Otto fallback committed.
- Demanded Greta R4 exact/mixed commitment.
- Voted Ja Ines-Greta; lone Nein; identified Ines/Greta contradiction; demanded transfer.
- Lena defense insufficient; Otto result cannot resolve R4.
- Demanded Lena R2 report.
- Urged Greta nominee/fallback excluding Greta/Ines.
- Demanded Ines result before nomination.
- Asked Rosa mixed-hand Liberal/full report.
- Demanded exact R5 reports; identified Greta leading suspect.
- Said exclude Greta/Rosa until R5 claims reconcile.
- If Rosa maintains F-F, reject future Greta governments.
bid round 55s
Suspects/evidence:
- Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President in consecutive F governments; R4 conflict with Ines; R5 report F-F-L, discarded F, passed F-L conflicts with Rosa firsthand F-F.
- Rosa: R5 Chancellor; F-F claim conflicts with Greta; may be lying or victim of Greta.
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in F governments; R4 conflict with Greta; withheld Otto investigation result.
- Lena: R2 President during F; report unverified; defended Greta.
- R5 F narrowed Greta/Rosa/draw; Hitler threshold active.
Open questions:
- Rosa: exact R5 transfer/discard; reconcile F-F claim.
- Greta: reconcile R4/R5 reports; answer Rosa F-F claim.
- Ines: exact R2/R4 reports; Otto investigation result.
- Lena: exact R2 report.
- Boris: R1 hand/report.
- Lone Nein was Otto; reason: prevent a government with Greta after her consecutive F governments and conflicting R5 account, especially with 3 F policies making Hitler election immediately dangerous.
Already said:
- R2 F narrowed Lena/Ines/draw; demanded reports.
- Asked Boris R1 hand; unanswered.
- Asked Ines nominee/fallback; Greta/Otto fallback committed.
- Demanded Greta R4 exact/mixed commitment.
- Voted Ja Ines-Greta; lone Nein; identified Ines/Greta contradiction; demanded transfer.
- Lena defense insufficient; Otto result cannot resolve R4.
- Demanded Lena R2 report.
- Urged Greta nominee/fallback excluding Greta/Ines.
- Demanded Ines result before nomination.
- Asked Rosa mixed-hand Liberal/full report.
- Demanded exact R5 reports; identified Greta leading suspect.
- Said exclude Greta/Rosa until R5 claims reconcile.
- If Rosa maintains F-F, reject future Greta governments.
bid round 534s
Suspects/evidence:
- Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President in consecutive F governments; R5 account conflicts with Rosa’s F-F claim.
- Rosa: R5 Chancellor; F-F claim conflicts with Greta; may be lying or victim of Greta.
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in F governments; R4 account conflict with Greta; owes Otto investigation result context.
- Lena: R2 President during F; report unverified; defended Greta.
- R5 F narrowed Greta/Rosa/draw; Hitler threshold active.
Open questions:
- Rosa: exact R5 transfer/discard; reconcile F-F claim.
- Greta: reconcile R4/R5 reports; answer Rosa F-F claim.
- Ines: exact R2/R4 reports.
- Lena: exact R2 report.
- Boris: R1 hand/report.
Already said:
- R2 F narrowed Lena/Ines/draw; demanded reports.
- Asked Boris R1 hand; unanswered.
- Asked Ines nominee/fallback; Greta/Otto fallback committed.
- Demanded Greta R4 exact/mixed commitment.
- Voted Ja Ines-Greta; lone Nein; identified Ines/Greta contradiction; demanded transfer.
- Lena defense insufficient; Otto result cannot resolve R4.
- Demanded Lena R2 report.
- Urged Greta nominee/fallback excluding Greta/Ines.
- Demanded Ines result before nomination.
- Asked Rosa mixed-hand Liberal/full report.
- Demanded exact R5 reports; identified Greta leading suspect.
- Said exclude Greta/Rosa until R5 claims reconcile.
- If Rosa maintains F-F, reject future Greta governments.
speak round 56s
Answer Lena directly. The lone Nein was already stated, but she explicitly asks confirmation. Ines never reported the investigation result, which is a concrete accountability failure, not evidence of my alignment.
Suspects/evidence:
- Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President in consecutive F governments; R5 account conflicts with Rosa's firsthand F-F claim; reject future Greta governments.
- Rosa: R5 Chancellor; F-F claim conflicts with Greta; either Rosa lies or Greta passed F-F.
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in F governments; R4 claim conflict with Greta; promised Otto investigation result, never reported it.
- Lena: R2 President during F; report unverified; defended Greta.
- R5 F narrowed Greta/Rosa/draw; Hitler threshold active.
Open questions:
- Ines: report Otto investigation result; exact R2/R4 reports.
- Greta/Rosa: reconcile R5 transfer and discard.
- Lena: exact R2 draw/discard/passed cards.
- Boris: R1 hand/report.
Already said:
- R2 F narrowed Lena/Ines/draw; demanded reports.
- Asked Boris R1 hand; unanswered.
- Asked Ines nominee/fallback; Greta/Otto fallback committed.
- Demanded Greta R4 exact/mixed commitment.
- Voted Ja Ines-Greta; confirmed lone Nein; identified Ines/Greta contradiction; demanded transfer.
- Lena defense insufficient; Otto result cannot resolve R4.
- Demanded Lena R2 report.
- Urged Greta nominee/fallback excluding Greta/Ines.
- Demanded Ines result before nomination.
- Asked Rosa mixed-hand Liberal/full report.
- Demanded exact R5 reports; identified Greta leading suspect.
- Said exclude Greta/Rosa until R5 claims reconcile.
- If Rosa maintains F-F, reject future Greta governments.
- Confirmed lone Nein was mine; noted Ines never reported investigation result.
speak round 515s
No genuinely new mechanical evidence is available; avoid repeating the unresolved Greta-Rosa contradiction. Pass this turn.
Suspects/evidence:
- Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President in consecutive F governments; R5 exact report conflicts with Rosa's firsthand F-F claim; reject future Greta governments.
- Rosa: R5 Chancellor; F-F claim conflicts with Greta; either Rosa lies or Greta passed F-F.
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in F governments; R4 claim conflicts with Greta; promised Otto investigation result, never reported it.
- Lena: R2 President during F; exact report unverified; defended Greta.
- R5 F narrowed Greta/Rosa/draw; Hitler threshold active.
Open questions:
- Ines: Otto investigation result; exact R2/R4 reports.
- Greta/Rosa: reconcile R5 transfer and discard.
- Lena: exact R2 draw/discard/passed cards.
- Boris: R1 hand/report.
Already said:
- R2 F narrowed Lena/Ines/draw; demanded reports.
- Asked Boris R1 hand; unanswered.
- Asked Ines nominee/fallback; Greta/Otto fallback committed.
- Demanded Greta R4 exact/mixed commitment.
- Voted Ja Ines-Greta; confirmed lone Nein; identified Ines/Greta contradiction; demanded transfer.
- Lena defense insufficient; Otto result cannot resolve R4.
- Demanded Lena R2 report.
- Urged Greta nominee/fallback excluding Greta/Ines.
- Demanded Ines result before nomination.
- Asked Rosa mixed-hand Liberal/full report.
- Demanded exact R5 reports; identified Greta leading suspect.
- Said exclude Greta/Rosa until R5 claims reconcile.
- If Rosa maintains F-F, reject future Greta governments.
- Confirmed lone Nein was mine; noted Ines never reported investigation result.
speak round 54s
No new unanswered issue can be raised without repeating an existing point; pass.
Suspects/evidence:
- Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President in consecutive F governments; R5 report conflicts with Rosa firsthand F-F claim; reject future Greta governments.
- Rosa: R5 Chancellor; F-F claim conflicts with Greta; one lies or Greta passed F-F.
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in F governments; R4 claim conflicts with Greta; never reported promised Otto investigation result.
- Lena: R2 President during F; report unverified; defended Greta.
- R5 F narrowed Greta/Rosa/draw; Hitler threshold active.
Open questions:
- Ines: Otto investigation result; exact R2/R4 reports.
- Greta/Rosa: reconcile R5 transfer/discard.
- Lena: exact R2 draw/discard/passed cards.
- Boris: R1 hand/report.
Already said:
- R2 F narrowed Lena/Ines/draw; demanded reports.
- Asked Boris R1 hand; unanswered.
- Asked Ines nominee/fallback; Greta/Otto fallback committed.
- Demanded Greta R4 exact/mixed commitment.
- Voted Ja Ines-Greta; confirmed lone Nein; identified Ines/Greta contradiction; demanded transfer.
- Lena defense insufficient; Otto result cannot resolve R4.
- Demanded Lena R2 report.
- Urged Greta nominee/fallback excluding Greta/Ines.
- Demanded Ines result before nomination.
- Asked Rosa mixed-hand Liberal/full report.
- Demanded exact R5 reports; identified Greta leading suspect.
- Said exclude Greta/Rosa until R5 claims reconcile.
- If Rosa maintains F-F, reject future Greta governments.
- Confirmed lone Nein was mine; noted Ines never reported investigation.
bid round 56s
Suspects/evidence:
- Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President in consecutive F governments; R5 F report conflicts with Rosa's F-F claim; reject future Greta governments.
- Rosa: R5 Chancellor; F-F claim conflicts with Greta; one lies or Greta passed F-F.
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in F governments; R4 claim conflicts with Greta; never reported Otto investigation result.
- Lena: R2 President during F; report unverified; defended Greta.
- R5 F narrowed Greta/Rosa/draw; Hitler threshold active.
Open questions unanswered:
- Ines: Otto investigation result; exact R2/R4 reports.
- Greta/Rosa: reconcile R5 transfer/discard.
- Lena: exact R2 draw/discard/passed cards.
- Boris: R1 hand/report.
Already said:
- R2 F narrowed Lena/Ines/draw; demanded reports.
- Asked Boris R1 hand; unanswered.
- Asked Ines nominee/fallback; Greta/Otto fallback committed.
- Demanded Greta R4 exact/mixed commitment.
- Voted Ja Ines-Greta; confirmed lone Nein was mine; identified Ines/Greta contradiction; demanded transfer.
- Lena defense insufficient; Otto result cannot resolve R4.
- Demanded Lena R2 report.
- Urged Greta nominee/fallback excluding Greta/Ines.
- Demanded Ines result before nomination.
- Asked Rosa mixed-hand Liberal/full report.
- Demanded exact R5 reports; identified Greta leading suspect.
- Said exclude Greta/Rosa until R5 claims reconcile.
- If Rosa maintains F-F, reject future Greta governments.
- Noted Ines never reported investigation.
bid round 55s
Suspects/evidence:
- Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President in consecutive F governments; R5 F report conflicts with Rosa's F-F claim; reject future Greta governments.
- Rosa: R5 Chancellor; F-F claim conflicts with Greta; one lies or Greta passed F-F.
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in F governments; R4 claim conflicts with Greta; never reported Otto investigation result.
- Lena: R2 President during F; report unverified; defended Greta.
- R5 F narrowed Greta/Rosa/draw; Hitler threshold active.
Open questions unanswered:
- Ines: Otto investigation result; exact R2/R4 reports.
- Greta/Rosa: reconcile R5 transfer/discard.
- Lena: exact R2 draw/discard/passed cards.
- Boris: R1 hand/report.
Already said:
- R2 F narrowed Lena/Ines/draw; demanded reports.
- Asked Boris R1 hand; unanswered.
- Asked Ines nominee/fallback; Greta/Otto fallback committed.
- Demanded Greta R4 exact/mixed commitment.
- Voted Ja Ines-Greta; confirmed lone Nein was mine; identified Ines/Greta contradiction; demanded transfer.
- Lena defense insufficient; Otto result cannot resolve R4.
- Demanded Lena R2 report.
- Urged Greta nominee/fallback excluding Greta/Ines.
- Demanded Ines result before nomination.
- Asked Rosa mixed-hand Liberal/full report.
- Demanded exact R5 reports; identified Greta leading suspect.
- Said exclude Greta/Rosa until R5 claims reconcile.
- If Rosa maintains F-F, reject future Greta governments.
- Noted Ines never reported investigation.
- Boris→Nadia commitment is on record; no need to repeat.
bid round 55s
Suspects/evidence:
- Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President in consecutive F governments; R5 F report conflicts with Rosa; reject future Greta governments.
- Rosa: R5 Chancellor; F-F claim conflicts with Greta; one lies or Greta passed F.
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in F governments; R4 claim conflicts with Greta; delayed Otto investigation report.
- Lena: R2 President during F; report unverified; defended Greta.
- R5 F narrowed Greta/Rosa/draw; Hitler threshold active.
Open questions/unanswered:
- Greta: exact R4 cards/discard/passed; reconcile R5 transfer/discard; special-election President and Chancellor choices.
- Rosa: exact R5 cards/discard/passed; reconcile with Greta.
- Ines: exact R2/R4 reports; investigation result reported but timing/credibility issue.
- Lena: exact R2 draw/discard/passed.
- Boris: R1 hand/report.
Already said:
- R2 F narrowed Lena/Ines/draw; demanded reports.
- Asked Boris R1 hand; unanswered.
- Asked Ines nominee/fallback; Greta/Otto fallback committed.
- Demanded Greta R4 exact/mixed commitment.
- Voted Ja Ines-Greta; confirmed lone Nein was mine; identified Ines/Greta contradiction; demanded transfer.
- Lena defense insufficient; Otto result cannot resolve R4.
- Demanded Lena R2 report.
- Urged Greta nominee/fallback excluding Greta/Ines.
- Demanded Ines result before nomination.
- Asked Rosa mixed-hand Liberal/full report.
- Demanded exact R5 reports; identified Greta leading suspect.
- Said exclude Greta/Rosa until R5 claims reconcile.
- If Rosa maintains F-F, reject future Greta governments.
- Noted Ines never promptly reported investigation.
- Boris→Nadia commitment on record; no need repeat.
speak round 54s
Nadia has not yet answered Lena's direct request for a mixed-hand commitment and exact reporting. Ask her to commit before the special election proceeds; this is new and relevant.
Suspects/evidence:
- Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President in consecutive F governments; R5 F-L transfer claim conflicts with Rosa’s firsthand F-F claim; reject future Greta governments.
- Rosa: R5 Chancellor; F-F claim conflicts with Greta; one lies or Greta passed F.
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in F governments; R4 claim conflicts with Greta; delayed Otto investigation result.
- Lena: R2 President during F; report unverified; defended Greta.
- R5 F narrowed Greta/Rosa/draw; Hitler threshold active.
Open unanswered:
- Greta: exact R4 cards/discard/passed; reconcile R5 transfer; special-election action committed Boris/Nadia.
- Rosa: exact R5 cards/discard/passed; reconcile with Greta.
- Ines: exact R2/R4 reports; investigation result timing/credibility.
- Lena: exact R2 draw/discard/passed.
- Nadia: commit exact report and Liberal-from-mixed before special election.
- Boris: R1 hand/report.
Already said:
- R2 F narrowed Lena/Ines/draw; demanded reports.
- Asked Boris R1 hand; unanswered.
- Demanded Ines nominee/fallback; Greta/Otto fallback committed.
- Demanded Greta R4 exact/mixed commitment.
- Voted Ja Ines-Greta; confirmed lone Nein; identified Ines/Greta contradiction.
- Lena defense insufficient; Otto result cannot resolve R4.
- Demanded Lena R2 report.
- Urged Greta nominee/fallback excluding Greta/Ines.
- Demanded Ines result before nomination.
- Asked Rosa mixed-hand Liberal/full report.
- Demanded R5 reports; identified Greta leading suspect.
- Said exclude Greta/Rosa until R5 claims reconcile.
- If Rosa maintains F-F, reject future Greta governments.
- Noted Ines delayed investigation result.
- Boris→Nadia commitment recorded.
speak round 55s
No new point is needed; Nadia has not answered my already-recorded commitment request, and repeating it would violate the instruction.
Suspects/evidence:
- Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President in consecutive F governments; R4 claim conflicts with Ines; R5 F-L transfer conflicts with Rosa firsthand F-F; reject future Greta governments.
- Rosa: R5 Chancellor; F-F claim conflicts with Greta; one lies or Greta passed F-F.
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in F governments; delayed Otto investigation result; R4 transfer unresolved.
- Lena: R2 President during F; exact report unverified; defended Greta.
- R5 F narrowed Greta/Rosa/draw; Hitler threshold active.
Open unanswered:
- Greta: exact R4 cards/discard/passed; reconcile R5 transfer; execute committed Boris/Nadia special election.
- Rosa: exact R5 cards/discard/passed; reconcile with Greta.
- Ines: exact R2/R4 reports; investigation result was delayed but reported Otto Liberal.
- Lena: exact R2 draw/discard/passed.
- Nadia: explicit mixed-hand Liberal commitment and exact-report commitment.
- Boris: R1 hand/report.
Already said:
- R2 F narrowed Lena/Ines/draw; demanded reports.
- Asked Boris R1 hand; unanswered.
- Demanded Ines nominee/fallback; Greta/Otto fallback committed.
- Demanded Greta R4 exact/mixed commitment.
- Voted Ja Ines-Greta; confirmed lone Nein; identified Ines/Greta contradiction.
- Lena defense insufficient; Otto result cannot resolve R4.
- Demanded Lena R2 report.
- Urged Greta nominee/fallback excluding Greta/Ines.
- Demanded Ines result before nomination.
- Asked Rosa mixed-hand Liberal/full report.
- Demanded R5 reports; identified Greta leading suspect.
- Said exclude Greta/Rosa until R5 claims reconcile.
- If Rosa maintains F-F, reject future Greta governments.
- Noted Ines delayed investigation result.
- Boris committed to Nadia; Greta committed Boris/Nadia special election.
- Asked Nadia to commit mixed-hand Liberal and exact report; unanswered.
bid round 55s
Suspects/evidence:
- Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President in consecutive F governments; R4 claim conflicts with Ines; R5 F-L transfer conflicts with Rosa firsthand F-F; reject future Greta governments.
- Rosa: R5 Chancellor; F-F claim conflicts with Greta; one lies or Greta passed F-F.
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in F governments; delayed Otto investigation result; R4 transfer unresolved.
- Lena: R2 President during F; exact report unverified; defended Greta.
- R5 F narrowed Greta/Rosa/draw; Hitler threshold active.
Open unanswered:
- Greta: exact R4 cards/discard/passed; reconcile R5 transfer; execute committed Boris/Nadia special election.
- Rosa: exact R5 cards/discard/passed; reconcile with Greta.
- Ines: exact R2/R4 reports; investigation result delayed but reported Otto Liberal.
- Lena: exact R2 draw/discard/passed.
- Nadia: mixed-hand Liberal commitment and exact-report commitment.
- Boris: R1 hand/report.
Already said:
- R2 F narrowed Lena/Ines/draw; demanded reports.
- Asked Boris R1 hand; unanswered.
- Demanded Ines nominee/fallback; Greta/Otto fallback committed.
- Demanded Greta R4 exact/mixed commitment.
- Voted Ja Ines-Greta; confirmed lone Nein; identified Ines/Greta contradiction.
- Lena defense insufficient; Otto result cannot resolve R4.
- Demanded Lena R2 report.
- Urged Greta nominee/fallback excluding Greta/Ines.
- Demanded Ines result before nomination.
- Asked Rosa mixed-hand Liberal/full report.
- Demanded R5 reports; identified Greta leading suspect.
- Said exclude Greta/Rosa until R5 claims reconcile.
- If Rosa maintains F-F, reject future Greta governments.
- Noted Ines delayed investigation result.
- Boris committed to Nadia; Greta committed Boris/Nadia special election.
- Asked Nadia to commit mixed-hand Liberal and exact report; unanswered.
speak round 57s
Nadia has not answered my commitment question, but repeating it is discouraged. Add a concise standard for evaluating the special-election government without re-litigating prior claims.
Suspects/evidence:
- Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President in consecutive F governments; R4 claim conflicts with Ines; R5 F-L report conflicts with Rosa firsthand F-F; reject future Greta governments.
- Rosa: R5 Chancellor; F-F claim conflicts with Greta.
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in F governments; delayed Otto investigation result; R4 transfer unresolved.
- Lena: R2 President during F; exact report unverified; defended Greta.
- R5 F narrowed Greta/Rosa/draw; Hitler threshold active.
Open unanswered:
- Greta: exact R4 cards/discard/passed; reconcile R5 transfer; execute Boris/Nadia special election.
- Rosa: exact R5 cards/discard/passed; reconcile with Greta.
- Ines: exact R2/R4 reports; investigation result delayed, then reported Otto Liberal.
- Lena: exact R2 draw/discard/passed.
- Nadia: mixed-hand Liberal commitment and exact-report commitment.
- Boris: R1 hand/report.
Already said:
- R2 F narrowed Lena/Ines/draw; demanded reports.
- Asked Boris R1 hand; unanswered.
- Demanded Ines nominee/fallback; Greta/Otto fallback committed.
- Demanded Greta R4 exact/mixed commitment.
- Voted Ja Ines-Greta; confirmed lone Nein; identified Ines/Greta contradiction.
- Lena defense insufficient; Otto result cannot resolve R4.
- Demanded Lena R2 report.
- Urged Greta nominee/fallback excluding Greta/Ines.
- Demanded Ines result before nomination.
- Asked Rosa mixed-hand Liberal/full report.
- Demanded R5 reports; identified Greta leading suspect.
- Said exclude Greta/Rosa until R5 claims reconcile.
- If Rosa maintains F-F, reject future Greta governments.
- Noted Ines delayed investigation result.
- Boris committed Nadia; Greta committed Boris/Nadia special election.
- Asked Nadia mixed-hand Liberal/exact report; unanswered.
- Current: Boris/Nadia is controlled test; new F narrows to them/draw, not exonerating Greta.
bid round 611s
Suspects/evidence:
- Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President in consecutive F governments; R4 account conflicts with Ines; R5 report conflicts with Rosa. Reject future Greta governments.
- Rosa: R5 Chancellor; claims conflict with Greta.
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in F governments; delayed investigation result; R4 transfer unresolved.
- Lena: R2 President during F; report unverified; defended Greta.
- R5 F narrowed Greta/Rosa/draw; Hitler threshold active.
Open questions:
- Greta: R4 exact cards/discard/passed; reconcile R5; execute Boris/Nadia special election.
- Rosa: R5 exact cards/discard/passed; reconcile Greta.
- Ines: exact R2/R4 reports; delayed result reported Otto Liberal.
- Lena: exact R2 draw/discard/passed.
- Nadia: mixed-hand Liberal commitment and exact report.
- Boris: R1 hand/report.
Already said: R2 narrowed Lena/Ines/draw; demanded reports; asked Boris R1 hand; demanded Ines nominee/fallback; committed Greta/Otto fallback; demanded Greta R4 exact/mixed commitment; confirmed lone Nein on Ines-Greta; identified Ines/Greta contradiction; rejected Lena defense; demanded Lena R2 report; urged Greta nominee/fallback excluding Greta/Ines; demanded Ines result; asked Rosa full R5 report; demanded R5 reports; identified Greta leading suspect; exclude Greta/Rosa pending reconciliation; noted delayed Ines result; Boris/Nadia controlled test, new F would narrow to them/draw, not exonerate Greta.
bid round 64s
Suspects/evidence:
- Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President in consecutive F governments; R4 account conflicts with Ines; R5 report conflicts with Rosa. Reject future Greta governments.
- Rosa: R5 Chancellor; claims conflict with Greta.
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in F governments; delayed investigation result; R4 transfer unresolved.
- Lena: R2 President during F; report unverified; defended Greta.
- R5 F narrowed Greta/Rosa/draw; Hitler threshold active.
Open questions:
- Boris: nominate Nadia; exact draw/discard/transfer report this round.
- Nadia: commit to discard Fascist from mixed draw; exact final-hand report.
- Greta: R4 exact cards/discard/passed; reconcile R5; execute Boris/Nadia special election.
- Rosa: R5 exact cards/discard/passed; reconcile Greta.
- Ines: exact R2/R4 reports; delayed result reported Otto Liberal.
- Lena: exact R2 draw/discard/passed.
- Boris: R1 hand/report.
Already said: R2 narrowed Lena/Ines/draw; demanded reports; asked Boris R1 hand; demanded Ines nominee/fallback; committed Greta/Otto fallback; demanded Greta R4 exact/mixed commitment; confirmed lone Nein on Ines-Greta; identified Ines/Greta contradiction; rejected Lena defense; demanded Lena R2 report; urged Greta nominee/fallback excluding Greta/Ines; demanded Ines result; asked Rosa full R5 report; demanded R5 reports; identified Greta leading suspect; exclude Greta/Rosa pending reconciliation; noted delayed Ines result; Boris/Nadia controlled test, new F would narrow to them/draw, not exonerate Greta.
bid round 64s
Suspects/evidence:
- Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President in consecutive F governments; R4 account conflicts with Ines; R5 report conflicts with Rosa. Reject future Greta governments.
- Rosa: R5 Chancellor; claims conflict with Greta.
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in F governments; delayed investigation result; R4 transfer unresolved.
- Lena: R2 President during F; report unverified; defended Greta.
- R5 F narrowed Greta/Rosa/draw; Hitler threshold active.
Open questions:
- Boris: nominate Nadia; exact draw/discard/transfer report.
- Nadia: commitment to discard Fascist from mixed draw; exact final-hand report.
- Greta: R4 exact cards/discard/passed; reconcile R5; execute Boris/Nadia special election.
- Rosa: R5 exact cards/discard/passed; reconcile Greta.
- Ines: exact R2/R4 reports; delayed result reported Otto Liberal.
- Lena: exact R2 draw/discard/passed.
- Boris: R1 hand/report.
Already said: R2 narrowed Lena/Ines/draw; demanded reports; asked Boris R1 hand; demanded Ines nominee/fallback; committed Greta/Otto fallback; demanded Greta R4 exact/mixed commitment; confirmed lone Nein on Ines-Greta; identified Ines/Greta contradiction; rejected Lena defense; demanded Lena R2 report; urged Greta nominee/fallback excluding Greta/Ines; demanded Ines result; asked Rosa full R5 report; demanded R5 reports; identified Greta leading suspect; exclude Greta/Rosa pending reconciliation; noted delayed Ines result; Boris/Nadia controlled test, new F would narrow to them/draw, not exonerate Greta; no new point on Boris's Nadia question.
bid round 65s
Suspects/evidence:
- Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President in consecutive F governments; R4 account conflicts with Ines; R5 report conflicts with Rosa. Reject future Greta governments.
- Rosa: R5 Chancellor; claims conflict with Greta.
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in F governments; delayed investigation result; R4 transfer unresolved.
- Lena: R2 President during F; report unverified; defended Greta.
- R5 F narrowed Greta/Rosa/draw; Hitler threshold active.
Open questions:
- Boris: nominate Nadia; exact draw/discard/transfer report; commit before nomination.
- Nadia: mixed-hand discard commitment; exact final-hand report.
- Greta: R4 exact cards/discard/passed; reconcile R5; execute Boris/Nadia special election.
- Rosa: R5 exact cards/discard/passed; reconcile Greta.
- Ines: exact R2/R4 reports; delayed result reported Otto Liberal.
- Lena: exact R2 draw/discard/passed.
- Boris: R1 hand/report.
Already said: R2 narrowed Lena/Ines/draw; demanded reports; asked Boris R1 hand; demanded Ines nominee/fallback; committed Greta/Otto fallback; demanded Greta R4 exact/mixed commitment; confirmed lone Nein on Ines-Greta; identified Ines/Greta contradiction; rejected Lena defense; demanded Lena R2 report; urged Greta nominee/fallback excluding Greta/Ines; demanded Ines result; asked Rosa full R5 report; demanded R5 reports; identified Greta leading suspect; exclude Greta/Rosa pending reconciliation; noted delayed Ines result; Boris/Nadia controlled test, new F would narrow to them/draw, not exonerate Greta; no new point on Boris’s Nadia question.
speak round 65s
No genuinely new point to add; Boris and Nadia's commitments are already on record, and repeating the unanswered report demands would add nothing.
Suspects/evidence:
- Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President in consecutive F governments; R4 account conflicts with Ines; R5 report conflicts with Rosa. Reject future Greta governments.
- Rosa: R5 Chancellor; firsthand F-F claim conflicts with Greta.
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in F governments; delayed Otto investigation result; R4 transfer unresolved.
- Lena: R2 President during F; report unverified; defended Greta.
- R5 F narrowed Greta/Rosa/draw; Hitler threshold active.
Open questions:
- Boris: nominate Nadia; exact R6 draw/discard/transfer and F-discard commitment unanswered.
- Nadia: exact R6 final-hand report pending.
- Greta: R4 exact cards/discard/passed; reconcile R5.
- Rosa: reconcile R5 with Greta.
- Ines: exact R2/R4 reports; result reported Otto Liberal.
- Lena: exact R2 report.
Already said: demanded policy reports; identified Ines/Greta contradiction; identified Greta leading suspect; rejected future Greta; confirmed R5 lone Nein mine; urged/examined Boris-Nadia test; noted new F would narrow to Boris/Nadia/draw, not exonerate Greta; demanded commitments and exact R5 accounts; challenged delayed Ines result.
speak round 66s
Suspects/evidence:
- Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President in consecutive F governments; R4 account conflicts with Ines; R5 report conflicts with Rosa. Reject future Greta governments.
- Rosa: R5 Chancellor; firsthand F-F claim conflicts with Greta.
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in F governments; delayed Otto investigation result; R4 transfer unresolved.
- Lena: R2 President during F; report unverified; defended Greta.
- R5 F narrowed Greta/Rosa/draw; Hitler threshold active.
Open questions:
- Boris: nominate Nadia; exact R6 draw/discard/transfer and F-discard commitment unanswered.
- Nadia: exact R6 final-hand report pending.
- Greta: R4 exact cards/discard/passed; reconcile R5.
- Rosa: reconcile R5 with Greta.
- Ines: exact R2/R4 reports; result reported Otto Liberal.
- Lena: exact R2 report.
Already said:
- Demanded policy reports and commitments.
- Identified Ines/Greta contradiction; Greta leading suspect; rejected future Greta.
- Confirmed R5 lone Nein mine.
- Examined Boris-Nadia test; new F narrows to Boris/Nadia/draw, not Greta exoneration.
- Challenged delayed Ines result; demanded exact R5 accounts.
bid round 64s
Suspects/evidence:
- Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President in consecutive F governments; R4 account conflicts with Ines; R5 report conflicts with Rosa. Reject future Greta governments.
- Rosa: R5 Chancellor; firsthand F-F claim conflicts with Greta.
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in F governments; delayed Otto investigation result; R4 transfer unresolved.
- Lena: R2 President during F; report unverified; defended Greta.
- R5 F narrowed Greta/Rosa/draw; Hitler threshold active.
- R6 Boris-Nadia F would narrow culprits to Boris/Nadia/draw; nomination dangerous at 3F.
Open questions:
- Boris: exact R6 draw/discard/transfer; F-discard commitment.
- Nadia: exact R6 final-hand report.
- Greta: R4 exact cards/discard/passed; reconcile R5.
- Rosa: reconcile R5 with Greta.
- Ines: exact R2/R4 reports; result reported Otto Liberal.
- Lena: exact R2 report.
Already said:
- Demanded policy reports and commitments.
- Identified Ines/Greta contradiction; Greta leading suspect; rejected future Greta.
- Confirmed R5 lone Nein mine.
- Examined Boris-Nadia test; new F narrows to Boris/Nadia/draw, not Greta exoneration.
- Challenged delayed Ines result; demanded exact R5 accounts.
speak round 612s
No genuinely new point is available without repeating an unanswered commitment already made by Rosa or my prior accountability demands. Pass this turn.
Suspects/evidence:
- Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President in consecutive F governments; R4 account conflicts with Ines; R5 report conflicts with Rosa; reject future Greta governments.
- Rosa: R5 Chancellor; firsthand F-F claim conflicts with Greta.
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in F governments; delayed Otto investigation result; R4 transfer unresolved.
- Lena: R2 President during F; report unverified; defended Greta.
- R5 F narrowed Greta/Rosa/draw; Hitler threshold active.
- R6 Boris-Nadia F would narrow culprits to Boris/Nadia/draw; nomination dangerous at 3F.
Open questions:
- Boris: exact R6 draw/discard/transfer; direct F-discard commitment unanswered.
- Nadia: exact R6 final-hand report.
- Greta: R4 exact cards/discard/passed; reconcile R5.
- Rosa: reconcile R5 with Greta.
- Ines: exact R2/R4 reports; investigation result reported Otto Liberal.
- Lena: exact R2 report.
Already said:
- Demanded policy reports and commitments.
- Identified Ines/Greta contradiction; Greta leading suspect; rejected future Greta.
- Confirmed R5 lone Nein mine.
- Examined Boris-Nadia test; new F narrows to Boris/Nadia/draw, not Greta exoneration.
- Challenged delayed Ines result; demanded exact R5 accounts.
bid round 66s
Suspects/evidence:
- Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President in consecutive F governments; R4 account conflicts with Ines; R5 report conflicts with Rosa. Reject future Greta governments.
- Rosa: R5 Chancellor; firsthand F-F claim conflicts with Greta.
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in F governments; delayed Otto investigation result; R4 transfer unresolved.
- Lena: R2 President during F; report unverified; defended Greta.
- R5 F narrowed Greta/Rosa/draw; Hitler threshold active.
- R6 Boris-Nadia F would narrow culprits to Boris/Nadia/draw; nomination dangerous at 3F.
Open questions:
- Boris: exact R6 draw/discard/transfer; direct F-discard commitment unanswered.
- Nadia: exact R6 final-hand report.
- Greta: R4 exact cards/discard/passed; reconcile R5.
- Rosa: reconcile R5 with Greta.
- Ines: exact R2/R4 reports; investigation result reported Otto Liberal.
- Lena: exact R2 report.
Already said:
- Demanded policy reports and commitments.
- Identified Ines/Greta contradiction; Greta leading suspect; rejected future Greta.
- Confirmed R5 lone Nein mine.
- Examined Boris-Nadia test; new F narrows culprits to Boris/Nadia/draw, not Greta exoneration.
- Challenged delayed Ines result; demanded exact R5 accounts.
bid round 67s
Suspects/evidence:
- Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President in consecutive F governments; R4 account conflicts with Ines; R5 report conflicts with Rosa. Reject future Greta governments.
- Rosa: R5 Chancellor; firsthand F-F claim conflicts with Greta.
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in F governments; delayed Otto investigation result; R4 transfer unresolved.
- Lena: R2 President during F; report unverified; defended Greta.
- R5 F narrowed Greta/Rosa/draw; Hitler threshold active.
- R6 Boris-Nadia F would narrow culprits to Boris/Nadia/draw; nomination dangerous at 3F.
Open questions:
- Boris: exact R6 draw/discard/transfer; direct F-discard commitment unanswered.
- Nadia: exact R6 final-hand report and pre-committed pass.
- Greta: R4 exact cards/discard/passed; reconcile R5.
- Rosa: reconcile R5 with Greta.
- Ines: exact R2/R4 reports; investigation result reported Otto Liberal.
- Lena: exact R2 report.
Already said:
- Demanded policy reports and commitments.
- Identified Ines/Greta contradiction; Greta leading suspect; rejected future Greta.
- Confirmed R5 lone Nein mine.
- Examined Boris-Nadia test; new F narrows culprits to Boris/Nadia/draw, not Greta exoneration.
- Challenged delayed Ines result; demanded exact R5 accounts.
vote round 613s
Vote ja. Boris–Nadia is the least implicated available government: Boris was Chancellor in the Liberal R3 government, Nadia has not been in an enacted government, and both made explicit reporting and mixed-hand commitments. At 3 Fascist policies, a further Fascist enactment would narrow responsibility to Boris, Nadia, or the draw. I have no concrete basis to reject this government, and a failed election risks an automatic unfiltered policy.
Suspects/evidence:
- Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President in consecutive F governments; R4 account conflicts with Ines; R5 report conflicts with Rosa. Reject future Greta governments.
- Rosa: R5 Chancellor; firsthand F-F claim conflicts with Greta.
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in F governments; delayed Otto investigation result; R4 transfer unresolved.
- Lena: R2 President during F; report unverified; defended Greta.
- R5 F narrowed Greta/Rosa/draw; Hitler threshold active.
- R6 Boris-Nadia F would narrow culprits to Boris/Nadia/draw; nomination dangerous at 3F.
Open questions:
- Boris: exact R6 draw/discard/transfer; direct F-discard commitment now answered, report still owed.
- Nadia: exact R6 final-hand report and pre-committed pass, pending enactment.
- Greta: R4 exact cards/discard/passed; reconcile R5.
- Rosa: reconcile R5 with Greta.
- Ines: exact R2/R4 reports; investigation result reported Otto Liberal.
- Lena: exact R2 report.
Already said:
- Demanded policy reports and commitments.
- Identified Ines/Greta contradiction; Greta leading suspect; rejected future Greta.
- Confirmed R5 lone Nein mine.
- Examined Boris-Nadia test; new F narrows culprits to Boris/Nadia/draw, not Greta exoneration.
- Challenged delayed Ines result; demanded exact R5 accounts.
bid round 65s
Suspects/evidence:
- Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President in consecutive F governments; R4 account conflicts with Ines; R5 report conflicts with Rosa. Reject future Greta governments.
- Rosa: R5 Chancellor; firsthand F-F claim conflicts with Greta.
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in F governments; delayed Otto investigation result; R4 transfer unresolved.
- Lena: R2 President during F; report unverified; defended Greta.
- R5 F narrowed Greta/Rosa/draw; Hitler threshold active.
- R6 Boris-Nadia enacted Liberal; neither exonerated absent exact draw/discard/transfer reports.
Open questions:
- Boris: exact R6 draw/discard/transfer; direct F-discard commitment answered, report still owed.
- Nadia: exact R6 final-hand report and pre-committed pass, pending enactment.
- Greta: R4 exact cards/discard/passed; reconcile R5.
- Rosa: reconcile R5 with Greta.
- Ines: exact R2/R4 reports; investigation result reported Otto Liberal.
- Lena: exact R2 report.
Already said:
- Demanded policy reports and commitments.
- Identified Ines/Greta contradiction; Greta leading suspect; rejected future Greta.
- Confirmed R5 lone Nein mine.
- Examined Boris-Nadia test; new F narrows culprits to Boris/Nadia/draw, not Greta exoneration.
- Challenged delayed Ines result; demanded exact R5 accounts.
- R6 liberal outcome does not clear Boris or Nadia; exact accounts remain necessary.
speak round 65s
No new point to add; Nadia's exact report has already been requested and remains unanswered.
Suspects/evidence:
- Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President in consecutive F governments; R4 conflict with Ines; R5 report conflicts with Rosa; reject future Greta governments.
- Rosa: R5 Chancellor; firsthand F-F claim conflicts with Greta.
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in F governments; delayed Otto investigation result; R4 unresolved.
- Lena: R2 President during F; report unverified; defended Greta.
- R6 Boris-Nadia Liberal; outcome narrows no one absent exact reports.
Open questions:
- Nadia: exact R6 discard/enacted report; still unanswered.
- Boris: verify R6 exact draw/discard/transfer; reported L-L-F, discarded F, passed L-L.
- Greta/Rosa: reconcile R5 conflicting transfers.
- Greta/Ines: R4 exact reports.
- Lena: exact R2 report.
Already said:
- Demanded exact policy reports and precommitments.
- Identified Ines/Greta contradiction; Greta leading suspect; reject future Greta.
- Confirmed R5 lone Nein was mine.
- R6 Liberal does not exonerate Boris/Nadia.
- Challenged delayed Ines result and demanded R5 accounts.
bid round 64s
Suspects/evidence:
- Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President in consecutive F governments; R4 conflict with Ines; R5 report conflicts with Rosa; reject future Greta governments.
- Rosa: R5 Chancellor; firsthand F-F claim conflicts with Greta.
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in F governments; delayed Otto investigation result; R4 unresolved.
- Lena: R2 President during F; report unverified; defended Greta.
- R6 Boris-Nadia Liberal; outcome narrows no one absent exact reports.
Open questions:
- Nadia: exact R6 discard/enacted report; unanswered.
- Boris: verify R6 exact draw/discard/transfer; reported L-L-F, discarded F, passed L-L.
- Greta/Rosa: reconcile R5 conflicting transfers.
- Greta/Ines: R4 exact reports.
- Lena: exact R2 report.
Already said:
- Demanded exact policy reports and precommitments.
- Identified Ines/Greta contradiction; Greta leading suspect; reject future Greta.
- Confirmed R5 lone Nein was mine.
- R6 Liberal does not exonerate Boris/Nadia.
- Challenged delayed Ines result and demanded R5 accounts.
bid round 74s
Suspects/evidence:
- Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President in consecutive F governments; R4 conflict with Ines; R5 report conflicts with Rosa; reject future Greta governments.
- Rosa: R5 Chancellor; firsthand F-F claim conflicts with Greta.
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in F governments; delayed Otto investigation result; R4 unresolved.
- Lena: R2 President during F; report unverified; defended Greta.
- R6 Boris-Nadia Liberal; outcome narrows no one absent exact reports.
Open questions:
- Nadia: exact R6 discard/enacted report; unanswered.
- Boris: verify R6 exact draw/discard/transfer; reported L-L-F, discarded F, passed L-L.
- Greta/Rosa: reconcile R5 conflicting transfers.
- Greta/Ines: R4 exact reports.
- Lena: exact R2 report.
Already said:
- Demanded exact policy reports and precommitments.
- Identified Ines/Greta contradiction; Greta leading suspect; reject future Greta.
- Confirmed R5 lone Nein was mine.
- R6 Liberal does not exonerate Boris/Nadia.
- Challenged delayed Ines result and demanded R5 accounts.
bid round 74s
Suspects/evidence:
- Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President in consecutive F governments; R4 conflict with Ines; R5 report conflicts with Rosa; reject future Greta governments.
- Rosa: R5 Chancellor; firsthand F-F claim conflicts with Greta.
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in F governments; delayed Otto investigation result; R4 unresolved.
- Lena: R2 President during F; report unverified; defended Greta.
- R6 Boris-Nadia Liberal; outcome narrows no one absent exact reports.
Open questions:
- Nadia: exact R6 discard/enacted report; unanswered.
- Boris: verify R6 exact draw/discard/transfer; reported L-L-F, discarded F, passed L-L.
- Greta/Rosa: reconcile R5 conflicting transfers.
- Greta/Ines: R4 exact reports.
- Lena: exact R2 report.
Already said:
- Demanded exact policy reports and precommitments.
- Identified Ines/Greta contradiction; Greta leading suspect; reject future Greta.
- Confirmed R5 lone Nein was mine.
- R6 Liberal does not exonerate Boris/Nadia.
- Challenged delayed Ines result and demanded R5 accounts.
speak round 74s
Nadia directly asks for a precommitment. Give a clear commitment to report exact cards and enact Liberal from any mixed hand, while noting this makes the government accountable.
Suspects/evidence:
- Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President in consecutive F governments; R4 conflict with Ines; R5 report conflicts with Rosa; reject future Greta governments.
- Rosa: R5 Chancellor; firsthand F-F claim conflicts with Greta.
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in F governments; delayed Otto investigation result; R4 unresolved.
- Lena: R2 President during F; report unverified; defended Greta.
- R6 Boris-Nadia Liberal; outcome narrows no one absent exact reports.
Open questions:
- Nadia: exact R6 discard/enacted report; unanswered.
- Boris: verify R6 exact draw/discard/transfer; reported L-L-F, discarded F, passed L-L.
- Greta/Rosa: reconcile R5 conflicting transfers.
- Greta/Ines: R4 exact reports.
- Lena: exact R2 report.
Already said:
- Demanded exact policy reports and precommitments.
- Identified Ines/Greta contradiction; Greta leading suspect; reject future Greta.
- Confirmed R5 lone Nein was mine.
- R6 Liberal does not exonerate Boris/Nadia.
- Challenged delayed Ines result and demanded R5 accounts.
- Committed to exact R7 report and Liberal from any mixed hand.
speak round 76s
Nadia has asked me for a commitment, but nobody has yet secured her own handling commitment. Ask her to commit before nomination, creating accountability for both sides.
Suspects/evidence:
- Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President in consecutive F governments; R4 conflict with Ines; R5 report conflicts with Rosa; reject future Greta governments.
- Rosa: R5 Chancellor; firsthand F-F claim conflicts with Greta.
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in F governments; delayed Otto investigation result; R4 unresolved.
- Lena: R2 President during F; report unverified; defended Greta.
- R6 Boris-Nadia Liberal; outcome narrows no one absent exact reports.
Open questions:
- Nadia: exact R6 discard/enacted report; unanswered; now owes R7 handling commitment.
- Boris: verify R6 exact draw/discard/transfer; reported L-L-F, discarded F, passed L-L.
- Greta/Rosa: reconcile R5 conflicting transfers.
- Greta/Ines: R4 exact reports.
- Lena: exact R2 report.
Already said:
- Demanded exact policy reports and precommitments.
- Identified Ines/Greta contradiction; Greta leading suspect; reject future Greta.
- Confirmed R5 lone Nein was mine.
- R6 Liberal does not exonerate Boris/Nadia.
- Challenged delayed Ines result and demanded R5 accounts.
- Committed to exact R7 report and Liberal from any mixed hand.
- Asked Nadia for pre-nomination commitment to discard Fascist from mixed hand and report R7 cards.
speak round 73s
My commitment request to Nadia is already on the record and unanswered; repeating it would add nothing. I should pass this turn.
Suspects/evidence:
- Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President in consecutive F governments; R4 conflict with Ines; R5 report conflicts with Rosa; reject future Greta governments.
- Rosa: R5 Chancellor; firsthand F-F claim conflicts with Greta.
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in F governments; delayed Otto investigation result; R4 unresolved.
- Lena: R2 President during F; report unverified; defended Greta.
- R6 Boris-Nadia Liberal; outcome narrows no one absent exact reports.
Open questions:
- Nadia owes R7 pre-nomination commitment: discard Fascist from mixed hand and report exact draw/discard/transfer; unanswered.
- Nadia: exact R6 discard/enacted report; unanswered.
- Boris: verify R6 exact draw/discard/transfer; reported L-L-F, discarded F, passed L-L.
- Greta/Rosa: reconcile R5 conflicting transfers.
- Greta/Ines: R4 exact reports.
- Lena: exact R2 report.
Already said:
- Demanded exact policy reports and precommitments.
- Identified Ines/Greta contradiction; Greta leading suspect; reject future Greta.
- Confirmed R5 lone Nein was mine.
- R6 Liberal does not exonerate Boris/Nadia.
- Challenged delayed Ines result and demanded R5 accounts.
- Committed to exact R7 report and Liberal from any mixed hand.
- Asked Nadia for R7 pre-nomination commitment.
bid round 77s
Suspects/evidence:
- Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President in consecutive F governments; R4 conflict with Ines; R5 report conflicts with Rosa; reject future Greta governments.
- Rosa: R5 Chancellor; firsthand F-F claim conflicts with Greta.
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in F governments; delayed Otto investigation result; R4 unresolved.
- Lena: R2 President during F; report unverified; defended Greta.
- R6 Boris-Nadia Liberal; outcome narrows no one absent exact reports.
Open questions:
- Nadia owes R7 pre-nomination commitment: discard Fascist from mixed hand, exact draw/discard/transfer; unanswered.
- Nadia: exact R6 discard/enacted report; unanswered.
- Boris: verify R6 exact draw/discard/transfer; reported L-L-F, discarded F, passed L-L.
- Greta/Rosa: reconcile R5 conflicting transfers.
- Greta/Ines: R4 exact reports.
- Lena: exact R2 report.
Already said:
- Demanded exact policy reports and precommitments.
- Identified Ines/Greta contradiction; Greta leading suspect; reject future Greta.
- Confirmed R5 lone Nein was mine.
- R6 Liberal does not exonerate Boris/Nadia.
- Challenged delayed Ines result and demanded R5 accounts.
- Committed to exact R7 report and Liberal from any mixed hand.
- Asked Nadia for R7 pre-nomination commitment.
bid round 75s
Suspects/evidence:
- Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President in consecutive F governments; R4 conflict with Ines; R5 report conflicts with Rosa; reject future Greta governments.
- Rosa: R5 Chancellor; firsthand F-F claim conflicts with Greta.
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in F governments; delayed Otto investigation result; R4 unresolved.
- Lena: R2 President during F; report unverified; defended Greta.
- R6 Boris-Nadia Liberal; outcome narrows no one absent exact reports.
Open questions:
- Nadia owes R7 pre-nomination commitment: discard Fascist from mixed hand, exact draw/discard/transfer; unanswered.
- Nadia: exact R6 discard/enacted report; unanswered.
- Boris: verify R6 exact draw/discard/transfer; reported L-L-F, discarded F, passed L-L.
- Greta/Rosa: reconcile R5 conflicting transfers.
- Greta/Ines: R4 exact reports.
- Lena: exact R2 report.
Already said:
- Demanded exact policy reports and precommitments.
- Identified Ines/Greta contradiction; Greta leading suspect; reject future Greta.
- Confirmed R5 lone Nein was mine.
- R6 Liberal does not exonerate Boris/Nadia.
- Challenged delayed Ines result and demanded R5 accounts.
- Committed to exact R7 report and Liberal from any mixed hand.
- Asked Nadia for R7 pre-nomination commitment.
bid round 74s
Suspects/evidence:
- Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President in consecutive F governments; R4 conflict with Ines; R5 report conflicts with Rosa; reject future Greta governments.
- Rosa: R5 Chancellor; firsthand F-F claim conflicts with Greta.
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in F governments; delayed Otto investigation result; R4 unresolved.
- Lena: R2 President during F; report unverified; defended Greta.
- R6 Boris-Nadia Liberal; outcome narrows no one absent exact reports.
Open questions:
- Nadia owes R7 pre-nomination commitment: discard Fascist from mixed hand, exact draw/discard/transfer; unanswered.
- Nadia: exact R6 discard/enacted report; unanswered.
- Boris: verify R6 exact draw/discard/transfer; reported L-L-F, discarded F, passed L-L.
- Greta/Rosa: reconcile R5 conflicting transfers.
- Greta/Ines: R4 exact reports.
- Lena: exact R2 report.
Already said:
- Demanded exact policy reports and precommitments.
- Identified Ines/Greta contradiction; Greta leading suspect; reject future Greta.
- Confirmed R5 lone Nein was mine.
- R6 Liberal does not exonerate Boris/Nadia.
- Challenged delayed Ines result and demanded R5 accounts.
- Committed to exact R7 report and Liberal from any mixed hand.
- Asked Nadia for R7 pre-nomination commitment.
bid round 74s
Suspects/evidence:
- Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President in consecutive F governments; R4 conflict with Ines; R5 report conflicts with Rosa; reject future Greta governments.
- Rosa: R5 Chancellor; firsthand F-F claim conflicts with Greta.
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in F governments; delayed Otto investigation result; R4 unresolved.
- Lena: R2 President during F; report unverified; defended Greta.
- R6 Boris-Nadia Liberal; outcome narrows no one absent exact reports.
Open questions:
- Nadia owes R7 pre-nomination commitment: discard Fascist from mixed hand, exact draw/discard/transfer; unanswered.
- Nadia: exact R6 discard/enacted report; unanswered.
- Boris: verify R6 exact draw/discard/transfer; reported L-L-F, discarded F, passed L-L.
- Greta/Rosa: reconcile R5 conflicting transfers.
- Greta/Ines: R4 exact reports.
- Lena: exact R2 report.
Already said:
- Demanded exact policy reports and precommitments.
- Identified Ines/Greta contradiction; Greta leading suspect; reject future Greta.
- Confirmed R5 lone Nein was mine; specifically due suspicion of Greta after R4.
- R6 Liberal does not exonerate Boris/Nadia.
- Challenged delayed Ines result and demanded R5 accounts.
- Committed to exact R7 report and Liberal from any mixed hand.
- Asked Nadia for R7 pre-nomination commitment.
speak round 75s
Rosa directly asks about my lone Nein; answer specifically and consistently. My suspicion was grounded in Greta's R4 government enacting Fascist, followed by her R5 presidency nominating Rosa, not in hidden information.
Suspects/evidence:
- Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President in consecutive F governments; R4 conflict with Ines; R5 report conflicts with Rosa; reject future Greta governments.
- Rosa: R5 Chancellor; firsthand F-F claim conflicts with Greta.
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in F governments; delayed Otto investigation result; R4 unresolved.
- Lena: R2 President during F; report unverified; defended Greta.
- R6 Boris-Nadia Liberal; outcome narrows no one absent exact reports.
Open questions:
- Nadia: exact R6 discard/enacted report; unanswered.
- Boris: verify R6 exact draw/discard/transfer; reported L-L-F, discarded F, passed L-L.
- Greta/Rosa: reconcile R5 conflicting transfers.
- Greta/Ines: R4 exact reports.
- Lena: exact R2 report.
Already said:
- Demanded exact policy reports and precommitments.
- Identified Ines/Greta contradiction; Greta leading suspect; reject future Greta.
- Confirmed R5 lone Nein: suspicion of Greta after R4 F government, then R5 repeat exposure.
- R6 Liberal does not exonerate Boris/Nadia.
- Challenged delayed Ines result and demanded R5 accounts.
- Committed to exact R7 report and Liberal from any mixed hand.
- Asked Nadia for R7 pre-nomination commitment.
speak round 77s
No new substantive point is available without repeating my prior commitment or the unresolved reports already raised. Pass this turn.
Suspects/evidence:
- Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President in consecutive F governments; R5 account conflicts with Rosa; reject future Greta governments.
- Rosa: R5 Chancellor; transfer account conflicts with Greta.
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in F governments; R4 unresolved.
- Lena: R2 President during F; account unverified.
- Nadia/Boris: R6 Liberal narrows little; exact reports not independently verified.
Open questions:
- Nadia: R6 exact discard/enacted report; unanswered.
- Boris: verify R6 exact draw/discard/transfer.
- Greta/Rosa: reconcile R5 transfers.
- Greta/Ines: R4 exact reports.
- Lena: R2 exact report consistency.
Already said:
- Demanded exact reports/precommitments.
- Identified Ines/Greta R4 contradiction; Greta leading suspect; reject future Greta.
- Confirmed R5 lone Nein targeted Greta after R4 F government and repeat exposure.
- R6 Liberal does not exonerate Boris/Nadia.
- Challenged delayed Ines result; demanded R5 accounts.
- Committed to exact R7 report and Liberal from mixed hand.
- Asked Nadia for R7 pre-nomination commitment.
- Explained R5 Nein specifically due to Greta.
speak round 75s
No genuinely new point to add; avoid repeating the recorded commitment and suspicion analysis.
Suspects/evidence:
- Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President in consecutive F governments; R5 account conflicts with Rosa; reject future Greta governments.
- Rosa: R5 Chancellor; transfer account conflicts with Greta.
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in F governments; R4 unresolved.
- Lena: R2 President during F; late F-F-L account unverified.
- Nadia/Boris: R6 Liberal narrows little; exact reports not independently verified.
Open questions:
- Nadia: R6 exact discard/enacted report unanswered.
- Boris: verify R6 exact draw/discard/transfer.
- Greta/Rosa: reconcile R5 transfers.
- Greta/Ines: R4 exact reports.
Already said:
- Demanded exact reports/precommitments.
- Identified Ines/Greta R4 contradiction; Greta leading suspect; reject future Greta.
- R6 Liberal does not exonerate Boris/Nadia.
- Challenged delayed Ines result; demanded R5 accounts.
- Committed to exact R7 report and Liberal from mixed hand.
- Asked Nadia for R7 pre-nomination commitment.
- Explained R5 Nein specifically due to Greta.
vote round 74s
Vote Ja. Nadia and I made explicit pre-vote commitments to discard Fascist from mixed hands and report exact cards. I have no specific concrete evidence against Nadia, and the election tracker is at 0/3, so rejecting would be unjustified.
Suspects/evidence:
- Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President in consecutive F governments; R5 account conflicts with Rosa.
- Rosa: R5 Chancellor; transfer account conflicts with Greta.
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in F governments; R4 unresolved.
- Lena: R2 President during F; late F-F-L account unverified.
- Nadia/Boris: R6 Liberal narrows little; reports not independently verified.
Open questions:
- Nadia: R6 exact discard/enacted report unanswered.
- Boris: verify R6 exact draw/discard/transfer.
- Greta/Rosa: reconcile R5 transfers.
- Greta/Ines: R4 exact reports.
Already said:
- Demanded exact reports/precommitments.
- Identified Ines/Greta R4 contradiction; Greta leading suspect; reject future Greta.
- R6 Liberal does not exonerate Boris/Nadia.
- Challenged delayed Ines result; demanded R5 accounts.
- Committed to exact R7 report and Liberal from mixed hand.
- Asked Nadia for R7 pre-nomination commitment.
- Explained R5 Nein specifically due to Greta.
chancellor_enact round 74s
hand: ['L', 'L'] → enact_0
My available hand is Liberal–Liberal, so either legal action produces a Liberal policy. Enact one Liberal and discard the other. This brings the liberal total to 4 and does not create a new suspect government.
said: I enact a Liberal policy and discard the other Liberal. The government result is Liberal, as committed.
Suspects/evidence:
- Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President in consecutive F governments; R5 account conflicts with Rosa.
- Rosa: R5 Chancellor; transfer account conflicts with Greta.
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in F governments; R4 unresolved.
- Lena: R2 President during F; late F-F-L account unverified.
- Nadia/Boris: R6 Liberal narrows little; reports not independently verified.
Open questions:
- Nadia: R6 exact discard/enacted report unanswered.
- Boris: verify R6 exact draw/discard/transfer.
- Greta/Rosa: reconcile R5 transfers.
- Greta/Ines: R4 exact reports.
Already said:
- Demanded exact reports/precommitments.
- Identified Ines/Greta R4 contradiction; Greta leading suspect; reject future Greta.
- R6 Liberal does not exonerate Boris/Nadia.
- Challenged delayed Ines result; demanded R5 accounts.
- Committed to exact R7 report and Liberal from mixed hand.
- Asked Nadia for R7 pre-nomination commitment.
- Explained R5 Nein specifically due to Greta.
- Enacted Liberal from L-L hand; discarded the other Liberal.
bid round 73s
Suspects/evidence:
- Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President in consecutive F governments; R5 account conflicts with Rosa.
- Rosa: R5 Chancellor; transfer account conflicts with Greta.
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in F governments; R4 unresolved.
- Lena: R2 President during F; late F-F-L account unverified.
- Nadia/Boris: R6 Liberal narrows little; reports not independently verified.
Open questions:
- Nadia: R6 exact discard/enacted report unanswered.
- Boris: verify R6 exact draw/discard/transfer.
- Greta/Rosa: reconcile R5 transfers.
- Greta/Ines: R4 exact reports.
Already said:
- Demanded exact reports/precommitments.
- Identified Ines/Greta R4 contradiction; Greta leading suspect; reject future Greta.
- R6 Liberal does not exonerate Boris/Nadia.
- Challenged delayed Ines result; demanded R5 accounts.
- Committed to exact R7 report and Liberal from mixed hand.
- Asked Nadia for R7 pre-nomination commitment.
- Explained R5 Nein specifically due to Greta.
- Enacted Liberal from L-L hand; discarded the other Liberal.
bid round 75s
Suspects/evidence:
- Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President in consecutive F governments; R5 account conflicts with Rosa.
- Rosa: R5 Chancellor; transfer account conflicts with Greta.
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in F governments; R4 unresolved.
- Lena: R2 President during F; late F-F-L account unverified.
- Nadia/Boris: R6 Liberal narrows little; reports not independently verified.
Open questions:
- Nadia: R6 exact discard/enacted report unanswered.
- Boris: verify R6 exact draw/discard/transfer.
- Greta/Rosa: reconcile R5 transfers.
- Greta/Ines: R4 exact reports.
Already said:
- Demanded exact reports/precommitments.
- Identified Ines/Greta R4 contradiction; Greta leading suspect; reject future Greta.
- R6 Liberal does not exonerate Boris/Nadia.
- Challenged delayed Ines result; demanded R5 accounts.
- Committed to exact R7 report and Liberal from mixed hand.
- Asked Nadia for R7 pre-nomination commitment.
- Explained R5 Nein specifically due to Greta.
- Enacted Liberal from L-L hand; discarded the other Liberal.
New:
- R7 exact claim: drew L-L-F; discarded F; passed L-L; discarded L; enacted L.
speak round 75s
I was directly asked for the exact report, so give it clearly and consistently with my prior commitment: L-L-F, discard F, pass L-L, discard L, enact L. No need to add another accusation now.
Suspects/evidence:
- Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President in consecutive F governments; R5 account conflicts with Rosa.
- Rosa: R5 Chancellor; transfer account conflicts with Greta.
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in F governments; R4 unresolved.
- Lena: R2 President during F; late F-F-L account unverified.
- Nadia/Boris: R6 Liberal narrows little; reports not independently verified; Nadia R7 presidency now produced L with Otto.
Open questions:
- Nadia: R6 exact discard/enacted report unanswered; R7 exact draw/discard/transfer report.
- Boris: verify R6 exact draw/discard/transfer.
- Greta/Rosa: reconcile R5 transfers.
- Greta/Ines: R4 exact reports.
Already said:
- Demanded exact reports/precommitments.
- Identified Ines/Greta R4 contradiction; Greta leading suspect; reject future Greta.
- R6 Liberal does not exonerate Boris/Nadia.
- Challenged delayed Ines result; demanded R5 accounts.
- Committed to exact R7 report and Liberal from mixed hand.
- Asked Nadia for R7 pre-nomination commitment.
- Explained R5 Nein specifically due to Greta.
- Enacted Liberal from L-L hand; discarded the other Liberal.
- R7 exact report: drew L-L-F; discarded F; passed L-L; discarded L; enacted L.
speak round 76s
Nadia's president-side draw and discard remain unreported. The enacted Liberal only constrains the two cards she transferred; it does not establish what she discarded. Ask for that specific accountability without repeating prior accusations.
Suspects/evidence:
- Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President in consecutive F governments; R5 account conflicts with Rosa.
- Rosa: R5 Chancellor; transfer account conflicts with Greta.
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in F governments; R4 unresolved.
- Lena: R2 President during F; late F-F-L account unverified.
- Nadia/Boris: R6 Liberal narrows little; reports unverified. Nadia R7 produced L with Otto, but president-side report missing.
Open questions:
- Nadia: R7 three-card draw, discard, and two-card transfer; R6 exact discard/enacted report.
- Boris: verify R6 exact draw/discard/transfer.
- Greta/Rosa: reconcile R5 transfers.
- Greta/Ines: R4 exact reports.
Already said:
- Demanded exact reports/precommitments.
- Identified Ines/Greta R4 contradiction; Greta leading suspect; reject future Greta.
- R6 Liberal does not exonerate Boris/Nadia.
- Challenged delayed Ines result; demanded R5 accounts.
- Committed to exact R7 report and Liberal from mixed hand.
- Asked Nadia for R7 pre-nomination commitment.
- Explained R5 Nein specifically due to Greta.
- Enacted Liberal; reported R7 hand/action (though wording inaccurately called it a three-card draw).
speak round 74s
No new point is available; Nadia's missing report has already been raised and remains unanswered, so repeating it would violate the instruction.
Suspects/evidence:
- Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President in consecutive F governments; R5 account conflicts with Rosa.
- Rosa: R5 Chancellor; transfer account conflicts with Greta.
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in F governments; R4 unresolved.
- Lena: R2 President during F; late F-F-L account unverified.
- Nadia/Boris: R6 Liberal narrows little; reports unverified. Nadia R7 Liberal with Otto, president report missing.
Open questions:
- Nadia: R7 exact draw/discard/transfer; R6 exact discard/enacted report.
- Boris: verify R6 exact draw/discard/transfer.
- Greta/Rosa: reconcile R5 transfers.
- Greta/Ines: R4 exact reports.
Already said:
- Demanded exact reports/precommitments; identified Ines/Greta R4 contradiction; Greta leading suspect; reject future Greta.
- R6 Liberal does not exonerate Boris/Nadia; challenged delayed Ines result; demanded R5 accounts.
- Committed to exact R7 report and Liberal from mixed hand; asked Nadia pre-nomination commitment.
- Explained R5 Nein specifically due to Greta; enacted Liberal; reported R7 hand/action; noted Nadia's missing president-side report.
bid round 78s
Suspects/evidence:
- Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President in consecutive F governments; R5 account conflicts with Rosa; leading suspect.
- Rosa: R5 Chancellor; transfer account conflicts with Greta.
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in F governments; R4 unresolved.
- Lena: R2 President during F; late F-F-L account unverified.
- Nadia/Boris: R6 Liberal narrows little; reports unverified. Nadia R7 Liberal with Otto; president report missing.
Open questions/unanswered:
- Nadia: R7 exact draw/discard/transfer; R6 exact discard/enacted report.
- Boris: R6 exact draw/discard/transfer.
- Greta/Rosa: reconcile R5 transfers.
- Greta/Ines: R4 exact reports.
Already said:
- Demanded exact reports/precommitments; identified Ines/Greta R4 contradiction; Greta leading suspect; reject future Greta.
- R6 Liberal does not exonerate Boris/Nadia; challenged delayed Ines result; demanded R5 accounts.
- Committed to exact R7 report and Liberal from mixed hand; asked Nadia pre-nomination commitment.
- Explained R5 Nein specifically due to Greta; enacted Liberal; reported R7 hand/action; noted Nadia's missing president-side report.
bid round 75s
Suspects/evidence:
- Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President in consecutive F governments; R5 account conflicts with Rosa; leading suspect.
- Rosa: R5 Chancellor; transfer account conflicts with Greta.
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in F governments; R4 unresolved.
- Lena: R2 President during F; late F-F-L account unverified.
- Nadia/Boris: R6 Liberal narrows little; reports unverified. Nadia R7 Liberal with Otto; president report now given.
Open questions/unanswered:
- Nadia: R6 exact discard/enacted report.
- Boris: R6 exact draw/discard/transfer.
- Greta/Rosa: reconcile R5 transfers.
- Greta/Ines: R4 exact reports.
Already said:
- Demanded exact reports/precommitments; identified Ines/Greta R4 contradiction; Greta leading suspect; reject future Greta.
- R6 Liberal does not exonerate Boris/Nadia; challenged delayed Ines result; demanded R5 accounts.
- Committed to exact R7 report and Liberal from mixed hand; asked Nadia pre-nomination commitment.
- Explained R5 Nein specifically due to Greta; enacted Liberal; reported R7 hand/action; noted Nadia's missing president-side report.
New:
- Confirm Nadia's R7 sequence: L-L-F draw, F discard, L-L transfer; I discarded one L and enacted the other. My earlier wording reversed President/Chancellor roles; it was a wording error, not a changed account.
bid round 810s
Suspects/evidence:
- Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President in consecutive F governments; R5 account conflicts with Rosa; leading suspect.
- Rosa: R5 Chancellor; transfer account conflicts with Greta.
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in F governments; R4 unresolved.
- Lena: R2 President during F; late F-F-L account unverified.
- Nadia/Boris: R6 Liberal narrows little; reports unverified. Nadia R7 Liberal with Otto; president report given.
- Otto: R7 confirmed L-L-F draw, F discard, L-L transfer; discarded L, enacted L. Wording correction only.
Open questions/unanswered:
- Nadia: R6 exact discard/enacted report.
- Boris: R6 exact draw/discard/transfer.
- Greta/Rosa: reconcile R5 transfers.
- Greta/Ines: R4 exact reports.
Already said:
- Demanded exact reports/precommitments; identified Ines/Greta R4 contradiction; Greta leading suspect; reject future Greta.
- R6 Liberal does not exonerate Boris/Nadia; challenged delayed Ines result; demanded R5 accounts.
- Committed to exact R7 report and Liberal from mixed hand; asked Nadia pre-nomination commitment.
- Explained R5 Nein specifically due to Greta; enacted Liberal; noted Nadia’s missing president-side report.
nominate_chancellor round 85s
I am liberal and cannot nominate myself. At three Fascist policies, avoiding an unverified candidate is critical because Hitler Chancellor would immediately win. Boris has served as Chancellor in R1 and R3 and was Chancellor in the Liberal R6 government as President; all three governments enacted Liberal policies. The repeated Liberal outcomes make Boris the strongest available candidate, despite his exact R6 card report still being unanswered. Greta, Ines, and Rosa are directly tied to Fascist enactments, while Lena presided over R2's Fascist enactment and gave a late unverified account.
said: I nominate Boris. His governments in R1, R3, and R6 all enacted Liberal policies, making him the strongest available Chancellor at three Fascist policies. Boris, commit before the vote to report your exact draw, discard, and transfer, and to enact Liberal from any mixed hand. The R6 card report remains important, but Greta, Ines, and Rosa are directly tied to Fascist enactments, and Lena presided over R2.
Suspects/evidence:
- Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President in consecutive F governments; R5 transfer account conflicts with Rosa; leading suspect.
- Rosa: R5 Chancellor; account conflicts with Greta.
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in F governments; R4 unresolved.
- Lena: R2 President during F; late F-F-L account unverified.
- Boris: R1/R3/R6 governments all L outcomes; exact R6 report unanswered, but strongest available nominee.
- Nadia: R6 President L; R7 President with Otto, L outcome; R6 exact report unanswered.
- Otto: liberal; R7 L-L-F draw, F discard, L-L transfer, L enacted; wording correction only.
Open questions:
- Nadia and Boris: R6 exact draw/discard/transfer reports unanswered.
- Greta/Rosa: reconcile R5 transfers.
- Greta/Ines: R4 exact reports.
Already said:
- Demanded exact reports/precommitments; identified Ines/Greta R4 contradiction; Greta leading suspect; reject future Greta.
- R6 Liberal does not exonerate Boris/Nadia; challenged delayed Ines result; demanded R5 accounts.
- Committed to exact R7 report and Liberal from mixed hand; asked Nadia pre-nomination commitment.
- Explained R5 Nein specifically due to Greta; enacted Liberal; noted Nadia missing president-side report.
bid round 84s
Suspects/evidence:
- Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President in consecutive F governments; R5 transfer account conflicts with Rosa; leading suspect.
- Rosa: R5 Chancellor; account conflicts with Greta.
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in F governments; R4 unresolved.
- Lena: R2 President during F; late F-F-L account unverified.
- Boris: R1/R3/R6 governments all L outcomes; strongest available nominee, though exact R6 report unanswered.
- Nadia: R6 President L; R7 President with Otto, L outcome; R6 exact report unanswered.
- Otto: liberal; R7 L-L-F draw, F discard, L-L transfer, L enacted; wording correction only.
Open questions:
- Nadia and Boris: R6 exact draw/discard/transfer reports unanswered.
- Greta/Rosa: reconcile R5 transfers.
- Greta/Ines: R4 exact reports.
- Nadia: president-side R7 commitment/report previously requested.
Already said:
- Demanded exact reports/precommitments; identified Ines/Greta R4 contradiction; Greta leading suspect; reject future Greta.
- R6 Liberal does not exonerate Boris/Nadia; challenged delayed Ines result; demanded R5 accounts.
- Committed to exact R7 report and Liberal from mixed hand; asked Nadia pre-nomination commitment.
- Explained R5 Nein specifically due to Greta; enacted Liberal; noted Nadia missing president-side report.
- Current nomination: Otto-Boris; Boris's three prior governments enacted Liberals, making him best available test.
bid round 86s
Suspects/evidence:
- Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President in consecutive F governments; leading suspect.
- Rosa: R5 Chancellor; account conflicts with Greta.
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in F governments; R4 unresolved.
- Lena: R2 President during F.
- Boris: R1/R3/R6 governments all L outcomes; strongest nominee.
- Nadia: R6/R7 governments L outcomes; R6 account unanswered.
- Otto: R7 L enacted; liberal.
Open questions:
- Boris: exact R1/R3/R6 reports; must commit Liberal from mixed hand.
- Nadia: R6 exact draw/discard/transfer; R7 president commitment/report.
- Greta/Rosa: reconcile R5 transfers.
- Greta/Ines: exact R4 reports.
Already said:
- Demanded exact reports/precommitments; identified Ines/Greta R4 contradiction; Greta leading suspect; reject future Greta.
- R6 Liberal does not exonerate Boris/Nadia; challenged delayed Ines result; demanded R5 accounts.
- Committed exact R7 report and Liberal from mixed hand; asked Nadia pre-nomination commitment.
- Explained R5 Nein due to Greta; enacted Liberal; noted Nadia missing president report.
- Current Otto-Boris nomination: Boris's three prior governments enacted Liberals, best available test.
speak round 84s
Boris answered only the newly requested Round 1 account. His R3 and R6 governments both enacted Liberal policies, but exact reports remain unresolved; ask for them and a precommitment before voting.
Suspects/evidence:
- Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President in consecutive F governments; leading suspect.
- Rosa: R5 Chancellor; account conflicts with Greta.
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in F governments; R4 unresolved.
- Lena: R2 President during F.
- Boris: R1/R3/R6 governments all L outcomes; strongest nominee; R3/R6 exact reports pending.
- Nadia: R6/R7 governments L outcomes; R6 account unanswered.
- Otto: R7 L enacted; liberal.
Open questions:
- Boris: exact R3/R6 draw, discard, transfer; Liberal-from-mixed commitment.
- Nadia: R6 exact draw/discard/transfer.
- Greta/Rosa: reconcile R5 transfers.
- Greta/Ines: exact R4 reports.
Already said:
- Demanded exact reports/precommitments; identified Ines/Greta R4 contradiction; Greta leading suspect; reject future Greta.
- R6 Liberal does not exonerate Boris/Nadia; challenged delayed Ines result; demanded R5 accounts.
- Committed exact R7 report and Liberal from mixed hand; asked Nadia pre-nomination commitment.
- Explained R5 Nein due to Greta; enacted Liberal; noted Nadia missing president report.
- Current Otto-Boris nomination: Boris's three prior governments enacted Liberals; strongest available test.
- Asked Boris for exact R3/R6 reports and Liberal-from-mixed commitment.
speak round 84s
No new information to add; I already requested Boris's unresolved R3/R6 reports and mixed-hand commitment.
Suspects/evidence:
- Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President; consecutive F governments; leading suspect.
- Rosa: R5 Chancellor; R5 account conflicts with Greta.
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President during F enactments; R4 unresolved.
- Lena: R2 President during F enactment.
- Boris: R1/R3/R6 governments all L; strongest nominee; R3/R6 reports pending.
- Nadia: R6/R7 governments L; R6 report unanswered.
- Otto: R7 L enacted; liberal.
Open questions:
- Boris: exact R3/R6 draws, discards, transfers; Liberal-from-mixed commitment.
- Nadia: exact R6 draw/discard/transfer.
- Greta/Rosa: reconcile R5 transfers.
- Greta/Ines: exact R4 reports.
Already said:
- Demanded exact reports/precommitments; identified Ines/Greta R4 concern; Greta leading suspect; reject future Greta.
- R6 Liberal does not exonerate Boris/Nadia; challenged delayed Ines result; demanded R5 accounts.
- Committed exact R7 report and Liberal from mixed hand; asked Nadia pre-nomination commitment.
- Explained R5 Nein due to Greta; enacted Liberal; noted Nadia missing presidential report.
- Current Otto-Boris nomination: Boris's three prior governments enacted Liberals; strongest available test.
- Asked Boris for exact R3/R6 reports and Liberal-from-mixed commitment.
bid round 85s
Suspects/evidence:
- Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President; consecutive F governments; leading suspect.
- Rosa: R5 Chancellor; R5 account conflicts with Greta.
- Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President during F enactments; R4 unresolved.
- Lena: R2 President during F enactment.
- Boris: R1/R3/R6 governments all L; strongest nominee; R3/R6 reports still unanswered.
- Nadia: R6/R7 governments L; R6 report unanswered.
- Otto: R7 L enacted; liberal.
Open questions:
- Boris owes exact R3/R6 draws, discards, transfers; Liberal-from-mixed commitment.
- Nadia owes exact R6 draw/discard/transfer.
- Greta/Rosa owe reconciliation of R5 transfers.
- Greta/Ines owe exact R4 reports.
Already said:
- Demanded exact reports/precommitments; identified Ines/Greta R4 concern; Greta leading suspect; reject future Greta.
- R6 Liberal does not exonerate Boris/Nadia; challenged delayed Ines result; demanded R5 accounts.
- Committed exact R7 report and Liberal from mixed hand; asked Nadia pre-nomination commitment.
- Explained R5 Nein due to Greta; enacted Liberal; noted Nadia missing presidential report.
- Current Otto-Boris nomination: Boris's three prior governments enacted Liberals; strongest available test.
- Asked Boris for exact R3/R6 reports and Liberal-from-mixed commitment.
- Boris supplied only exact R1 report so far; R3/R6 still pending.