Player 5 (Nadia)

R1: No evidence/policy history. Boris considering Lena; Lena comfortable and promised precise account. Open: Boris owes exact-card/discard reporting if government elected. No suspects. Made aloud: Asked Boris to report exact 3 cards and discard, not only outcome.

R1: Boris-Lena enacted Liberal; no policy-based suspects. Exact card reports from Boris and Lena remain unanswered; specificity not proof. R2: Lena committed to nominate Ines; Ines volunteered exact independent report. Rosa asked Ines about choosing Liberal over Fascist when offered one each. Asked Lena for next nominee if Lena-Ines fails. Already said: asked Boris for exact 3-card draw/discard/passed report in R1.

R1: Boris-Lena enacted Liberal; no policy-based suspects. Exact card reports from Boris/Lena unanswered; specificity not proof. R2: Lena committed to nominate Ines; Ines volunteered exact independent report. Rosa asked Ines about choosing Liberal over Fascist when offered one each. Asked Lena for next nominee if Lena-Ines fails; unanswered. Already said: asked Boris for exact R1 3-card draw/discard/passed report; asked Lena to precommit fallback nominee.

R1: Boris-Lena enacted Liberal; no policy-based suspects. Exact card reports from Boris/Lena unanswered; specificity not proof. R2: Lena committed to nominate Ines; Ines volunteered exact independent report. Rosa asked Ines about choosing Liberal over Fascist when offered one each. Asked Lena for next nominee if Lena-Ines fails; unanswered. Already said: asked Boris for exact R1 3-card draw/discard/passed report; asked Lena to precommit fallback nominee. New: support Lena-Ines conditionally; require exact post-government card report.

R1: Boris-Lena enacted Liberal; no policy-based suspects. Exact card reports from Boris/Lena unanswered; specificity not proof. R2: Lena committed to nominate Ines; Ines volunteered exact independent report. Rosa asked Ines about choosing Liberal over Fascist when offered one each. Asked Lena for next nominee if Lena-Ines fails; unanswered. Support Lena-Ines conditionally; require exact post-government card report. Already said: asked Boris for exact R1 3-card draw/discard/passed report; asked Lena to precommit fallback nominee. Current: reiterate conditional support; request Lena's fallback commitment and both players' exact post-election card reports.

R1: Boris-Lena enacted Liberal; no policy-based suspects. Exact card reports from Boris/Lena unanswered; specificity not proof. R2: Lena precommitted Ines; Ines volunteered exact independent report. Rosa asked Ines about choosing Liberal over Fascist when offered one each. Nadia asked Lena for next nominee if Lena-Ines fails; unanswered. Suspects: none policy-based yet; Boris-Lena only government enacted Liberal. Open: Lena owes fallback nominee commitment; Boris/Lena owe R1 exact card reports; R2 Lena/Ines exact card accounts after government. Already said: requested Boris’s R1 3-card/discard/passed report; requested Lena’s R2 fallback nominee.

R1: Boris-Lena enacted Liberal; no policy-based suspects. Exact card reports from Boris/Lena unanswered; specificity not proof. R2: Lena precommitted Ines; Ines volunteered exact independent report. Rosa asked Ines about choosing Liberal over Fascist when offered one each. Nadia asked Lena for next nominee if Lena-Ines fails; unanswered. Suspects: none policy-based yet; Boris-Lena only government enacted Liberal. Open: Lena owes fallback nominee commitment; Boris/Lena owe R1 exact card reports; R2 Lena/Ines exact card accounts after government. Already said: requested Boris’s R1 3-card/discard/passed report; requested Lena’s R2 fallback nominee.

R1: Boris-Lena enacted Liberal; no policy-based suspects. Exact card reports from Boris/Lena unanswered; specificity not proof. R2: Lena precommitted Ines; Ines volunteered exact independent report. Rosa asked Ines about choosing Liberal over Fascist when offered one each. Nadia asked Lena for next nominee if Lena-Ines fails; unanswered. Suspects: none policy-based yet; Boris-Lena only government enacted Liberal. Open: Lena fallback nominee commitment; Boris/Lena R1 exact card accounts; R2 Lena/Ines exact card accounts after government. Already said: requested Boris R1 3-card/discard/passed report; requested Lena R2 fallback nominee.

R1: Boris-Lena enacted Liberal; no policy-based suspects. Exact card reports from Boris/Lena unanswered; specificity not proof. R2: Lena precommitted Ines; Ines volunteered exact independent report and committed to choose Liberal over Fascist if offered one each. Lena did not answer fallback nominee question. Suspects: none policy-based; Boris-Lena only enacted government, Liberal result. Open: Lena owes fallback nominee commitment; Boris/Lena owe R1 exact card accounts; Lena/Ines owe R2 exact accounts after government. Already said: requested Boris R1 3-card/discard/passed report; requested Lena R2 fallback nominee; voted Ja rationale: no concrete distrust.

R1: Boris-Lena enacted Liberal; no policy-based suspects. Exact card reports from Boris/Lena unanswered; specificity not proof. R2: Lena precommitted Ines; Ines volunteered exact independent report and committed to choose Liberal over Fascist if offered one each. Lena did not answer fallback nominee question. Lena-Ines government enacted Fascist: culprit is Lena, Ines, or unlucky draw. Suspects: Lena/Ines, based on R2 Fascist enactment; no policy-based suspicion from R1. Open: Lena owes fallback nominee commitment; Boris/Lena owe R1 exact 3-card/discard/passed accounts; Lena/Ines owe R2 exact accounts. Already said: requested Boris R1 card report; requested Lena R2 fallback nominee; voted Ja rationale: no concrete distrust; requested exact R2 accounts. New: weigh Lena/Ines against R2 outcome.

R1: Boris-Lena enacted Liberal; no policy-based suspects. Exact card reports from Boris/Lena unanswered; specificity not proof. R2: Lena nominated Ines; unanimous 7–0; Lena-Ines government enacted Fascist. Culprit narrowed to Lena, Ines, or unlucky draw. Lena did not answer fallback nominee question. Ines volunteered exact independent report and promised to choose Liberal over Fascist if mixed. Suspects: Lena/Ines, R2 Fascist outcome. Open: Lena owes fallback nominee commitment and exact R2 cards; Ines owes exact R2 cards/what she received and discarded; Boris/Lena owe R1 exact 3-card/discard/passed accounts. Already said: requested Boris R1 card report; requested Lena R2 fallback nominee; voted Ja rationale: no concrete distrust; requested exact R2 accounts; noted Lena/Ines R2 outcome.

R1: Boris-Lena enacted Liberal; exact card reports from Boris/Lena unanswered; no policy-based suspects. R2: Lena-Ines government enacted Fascist after unanimous 7–0. Culprit narrowed to Lena, Ines, or unlucky draw. Lena claims 2F+1L, discarded F, passed Ines F+L. Ines previously committed to choose Liberal if mixed; now owes exact received/discarded account and why. Lena owes exact draw/discard plus fallback nominee commitment. Suspects: Lena/Ines based on R2 Fascist outcome and conflicting/unfinished accounts. Already said: asked Boris R1 card report; asked Lena R2 fallback nominee; voted Ja due no concrete distrust; requested exact R2 accounts; noted Lena/Ines outcome.

Suspects: Lena/Ines. R2 Lena–Ines enacted F; Lena claims 2F+1L, discarded F, passed mixed; Ines had committed to choose L from mixed. Lena’s claim unverified; Ines’s alleged violation is key. Open: Ines owes exact two received, discard, enacted card, and explanation; Lena owes R2 exact draw/discard consistency and unanswered fallback nominee commitment. Boris/Lena R1 exact reports never given. Already said: asked Boris R1 card report; asked Lena R2 fallback nominee; voted Ja; requested exact R2 accounts; noted Lena/Ines outcome; flagged Lena/Ines scrutiny.

Suspects: Lena/Ines. R2 Lena–Ines enacted F; Lena claims 2F+1L, discarded F, passed mixed; Ines committed to choose L from mixed. Lena claim unverified; Ines alleged violation key. Open: Ines exact received cards/discard/enacted/explanation; Lena R2 fallback nominee; Boris/Lena R1 exact reports. Already said: asked Boris R1 card report; asked Lena R2 fallback nominee; voted Ja; requested exact R2 accounts; flagged Lena/Ines; asked Ines why she violated commitment.

Suspects: Lena/Ines. R2 Lena–Ines enacted F; Lena claims 2F+1L, discarded F, passed mixed; Ines committed to choose L from mixed. Lena claim unverified; Ines alleged violation. Voting against Ines pending account; Lena still implicated. Open: Ines exact received cards/discard/enacted/explanation; Lena R2 fallback nominee; Boris/Lena R1 exact reports. Already said: asked Boris R1 card report; asked Lena R2 fallback nominee; voted Ja; requested exact R2 accounts; flagged Lena/Ines; asked Ines why she violated commitment; stated future vote against Ines pending account.

Suspects: Lena/Ines. R2 Lena–Ines enacted F; Lena claims 2F+1L, discarded F, passed mixed; Ines committed to choose L from mixed. Lena claim unverified; Ines alleged violation. Voting against Ines pending account; Lena implicated. Open: Ines exact received/discarded/enacted cards + explanation; Lena R2 fallback nominee; Boris/Lena R1 exact reports. Already said: asked Boris R1 card report; asked Lena R2 fallback nominee; voted Ja; requested exact R2 accounts; flagged Lena/Ines; asked Ines why she violated commitment; stated future vote against Ines pending account.

Suspects: Lena/Ines. R2 Lena–Ines enacted F; Lena claims 2F+1L, discarded F, passed mixed; Ines committed to choose L from mixed. Lena claim unverified; Ines alleged violation. Voting against Ines pending account; Lena implicated. Open: Ines exact received/discarded/enacted cards + explanation; Lena R2 fallback nominee; Boris/Lena R1 exact reports. Already said: asked Boris R1 card report; asked Lena R2 fallback nominee; voted Ja; requested exact R2 accounts; flagged Lena/Ines; asked Ines why she violated commitment; stated future vote against Ines pending account.

Suspects: Lena/Ines. R2 Lena–Ines enacted F; Lena claims 2F+1L, discarded F, passed mixed; Ines alleged violation of commitment to choose L. Lena claim unverified; both implicated by outcome. Voting against Ines pending account. Open: Ines exact received/discarded/enacted cards + explanation; Lena R2 fallback nominee; Boris/Lena R1 exact reports; Rosa intended fallback if Boris government fails. Already said: asked Boris R1 card report; asked Lena R2 fallback nominee; voted Ja; requested exact R2 accounts; flagged Lena/Ines; asked Ines why she violated commitment; stated future vote against Ines pending account. Rosa now nominates Boris; Boris commits exact R1 report.

Suspects: Lena/Ines. R2 Lena–Ines enacted F; Lena claims 2F+1L, discarded F, passed mixed; Ines claims 2F received and enacted F, contradicting Lena. Both implicated; no independent resolution. Open questions: Ines exact received/discarded/enacted account and explanation owed; Lena R2 fallback nominee owed; Boris R1 exact draw/discard/pass report owed; Rosa fallback nominee owed; Boris mixed-hand policy commitment pending. Already said: asked Boris R1 card report; asked Lena R2 fallback; voted Ja; requested exact R2 accounts; flagged Lena/Ines; asked Ines why she violated commitment; stated future vote against Ines pending account.

Suspects: Lena/Ines. R2 Lena–Ines enacted F; Lena claims 2F+1L, discarded F, passed mixed; Ines claims 2F received and enacted F, contradicting Lena. Both implicated; no independent resolution. Open questions: Ines exact received/discarded/enacted account and explanation owed; Lena R2 fallback nominee owed; Boris R1 exact draw/discard/pass report owed; Rosa fallback nominee owed; Boris mixed-hand policy commitment pending. Already said: asked Boris R1 card report; asked Lena R2 fallback; voted Ja; requested exact R2 accounts; flagged Lena/Ines; asked Ines why she violated commitment; stated future vote against Ines pending account.

Suspects: Lena/Ines. R2 Lena–Ines enacted F; Lena claims 2F+1L, discarded F, passed mixed; Ines claims 2F received and enacted F, contradiction unresolved. Open questions: Ines exact R2 received/discarded/enacted account and explanation; Lena R2 fallback nominee; Boris R1 exact draw/discard/pass report; Rosa fallback nominee; Boris mixed-hand policy commitment; Rosa intended policy handling before vote. Already said: asked Boris R1 card report; asked Lena R2 fallback; voted Ja; requested exact R2 accounts; flagged Lena/Ines; asked Ines why she violated commitment; stated future vote against Ines pending account.

Suspects: Lena/Ines. R2 Lena–Ines enacted F; Lena claims 2F+1L, discarded F, passed mixed; Ines claims 2F received and enacted F, contradiction unresolved. Open questions: Ines exact R2 received/discarded/enacted account and explanation; Lena R2 fallback nominee; Boris R1 exact draw/discard/pass report; Rosa fallback nominee; Boris mixed-hand policy commitment; Rosa intended policy handling before vote. Already said: asked Boris R1 card report; asked Lena R2 fallback; voted Ja; requested exact R2 accounts; flagged Lena/Ines; asked Ines why she violated commitment; stated future vote against Ines pending account; asked Rosa for fallback nominee.

Suspects: Lena/Ines. R2 Lena–Ines enacted F; Lena claims 2F+1L, discarded F, passed mixed; Ines claims 2F received and enacted F, contradiction unresolved. Open questions: Ines exact R2 received/discarded/enacted account and explanation; Lena R2 fallback nominee; Boris R1 exact draw/discard/pass report; Rosa fallback nominee; Boris mixed-hand policy commitment; Rosa intended policy handling before vote. None answered. Already said: asked Boris R1 card report; asked Lena R2 fallback; voted Ja; requested exact R2 accounts; flagged Lena/Ines; asked Ines why she violated commitment; stated future vote against Ines pending account; asked Rosa for fallback nominee; Rosa says she’ll vote Ja and calls Boris cleanest test.

Suspects: Lena/Ines. R2 Lena–Ines enacted F; Lena claims 2F+1L, discarded F, passed mixed; Ines claims 2F received and enacted F, contradiction unresolved. Open questions: Ines exact R2 received/discarded/enacted account and explanation; Lena R2 fallback nominee; Boris R1 exact draw/discard/pass report; Rosa fallback nominee; Boris mixed-hand policy commitment; Rosa intended policy handling before vote. None answered. Already said: asked Boris R1 card report; asked Lena R2 fallback; voted Ja; requested exact R2 accounts; flagged Lena/Ines; asked Ines why she violated commitment; stated future vote against Ines pending account; asked Rosa for fallback nominee; Rosa says she’ll vote Ja and calls Boris cleanest test.

Suspects: Lena/Ines. R2 Lena–Ines enacted F; Lena claims 2F+1L, discarded F, passed mixed; Ines claims 2F received and enacted F, contradiction unresolved. Open questions: Ines exact R2 received/discarded/enacted account and explanation; Lena R2 fallback nominee; Boris R1 exact draw/discard/pass report; Rosa fallback nominee; Boris mixed-hand policy commitment; Rosa intended policy handling before vote. None answered. Already said: asked Boris R1 card report; asked Lena R2 fallback; voted Ja; requested exact R2 accounts; flagged Lena/Ines; asked Ines why she violated commitment; stated future vote against Ines pending account; asked Rosa for fallback nominee; Rosa says she’ll vote Ja and calls Boris cleanest test; noted Rosa exact-report commitment is useful but policy outcome still determines blame.

Suspects: Lena/Ines. R2 Lena–Ines enacted F; Lena claims 2F+1L, discarded F, passed mixed; Ines claims 2F received and enacted F; contradiction unresolved. Open questions: Ines R2 exact received/discarded/enacted account + explanation; Lena R2 fallback nominee; Boris R1 exact draw/discard/pass; Rosa fallback nominee; Rosa commitment to pass L whenever available (new, asked now). Already said: asked Boris R1 card report; asked Lena R2 fallback; voted Ja; requested exact R2 accounts; flagged Lena/Ines; asked Ines why she violated commitment; stated future vote against Ines pending account; asked Rosa fallback; supported scrutiny of Rosa/Boris test; requested Rosa exact report; noted Rosa report commitment is useful but outcome determines blame.

Suspects: Lena/Ines. R2 Lena–Ines enacted F; Lena claims 2F+1L, discarded F, passed mixed; Ines claims 2F received and enacted F; contradiction unresolved. Open questions: Ines R2 exact received/discarded/enacted account + explanation; Lena R2 fallback nominee; Boris R1 exact draw/discard/pass; Rosa fallback nominee; Rosa commitment to pass L whenever available (new, asked now). No answers recorded. Already said: asked Boris R1 card report; asked Lena R2 fallback; voted Ja; requested exact R2 accounts; flagged Lena/Ines; asked Ines why she violated commitment; stated future vote against Ines pending account; asked Rosa fallback; supported scrutiny of Rosa/Boris test; requested Rosa exact report; noted Rosa report commitment is useful but outcome determines blame; asked Rosa to commit to pass L whenever available.

Suspects: Lena/Ines. R2 Lena–Ines enacted F; Lena claims 2F+1L, discarded F, passed mixed; Ines claims 2F received and enacted F; contradiction unresolved. Open questions: Ines R2 exact received/discarded/enacted account + explanation; Lena R2 fallback nominee; Boris R1 exact draw/discard/pass; Rosa fallback nominee. No answers recorded. Already said: asked Boris R1 card report; asked Lena R2 fallback; voted Ja; requested exact R2 accounts; flagged Lena/Ines; asked Ines why she violated commitment; stated future vote against Ines pending account; asked Rosa fallback; supported scrutiny of Rosa/Boris test; requested Rosa exact report; noted Rosa report commitment useful but outcome determines blame; asked Rosa to commit to pass L whenever available; Rosa committed to pass L when available and named Greta as fallback; now asked Boris to commit to full report.

Suspects: Lena/Ines. R2 Lena–Ines enacted F; Lena claims 2F+1L, discarded F, passed mixed; Ines claims 2F received/enacted F; contradiction unresolved. Open questions: Ines R2 exact received/discarded/enacted account + commitment violation explanation; Lena R2 fallback nominee; Boris R1 exact draw/discard/pass; Rosa R3 exact draw/discard/pass/enacted report after government. Answered: Rosa named Greta fallback; Rosa committed to pass L whenever drawn and report exact cards; Boris committed to full R3 report and mixed-hand handling. Already said: asked Boris R1 report; asked Lena fallback; voted Ja R1/R2; requested exact R2 accounts; flagged Lena/Ines; asked Ines why she violated commitment; said future vote against Ines pending account; asked Rosa fallback; supported Rosa/Boris test; requested Rosa exact report; asked Rosa pass-L commitment; asked Boris full report.

Suspects: Lena/Ines. R2 Lena–Ines enacted F; Lena claimed 2F+1L, discarded F, passed mixed; Ines claimed 2F received/enacted F. Contradiction unresolved. Open: Ines R2 exact received/discarded/enacted account + commitment-violation explanation; Lena R2 fallback nominee; Boris R1 exact draw/discard/pass; Rosa R3 exact draw/discard/pass/enacted report. Already said: asked Boris R1 report; asked Lena fallback; voted Ja R1/R2; requested exact R2 accounts; flagged Lena/Ines; asked Ines why commitment violated; said future vote against Ines pending account; asked Rosa fallback; supported Rosa/Boris test; requested Rosa exact report; asked Rosa pass-L commitment; asked Boris full report.

Suspects: Lena/Ines. R2 Lena–Ines enacted F; Lena claimed 2F+1L, discarded F, passed mixed; Ines claimed 2F received/enacted F. Contradiction unresolved. Open unanswered: Ines R2 exact received/discarded/enacted account + commitment-violation explanation; Lena R2 fallback nominee; Boris R1 exact draw/discard/pass; Rosa R3 exact draw/discard/pass/enacted report; Rosa pass-L commitment. Already said: asked Boris R1 report; asked Lena fallback; voted Ja R1/R2; requested exact R2 accounts; flagged Lena/Ines; asked Ines why commitment violated; said future vote against Ines pending account; asked Rosa fallback; supported Rosa/Boris test; requested Rosa exact report; asked Boris full report.

Suspects: Lena/Ines—R2 Lena–Ines enacted F; Lena claimed 2F+1L, discarded F, passed mixed; Ines claimed 2F received/enacted F. Contradiction unresolved. Greta untested, so R4 outcome will narrow responsibility to Ines/Greta/draw. Open: Ines R2 exact received/discarded/enacted account + commitment-violation explanation; Lena R2 fallback nominee; Boris R1 exact draw/discard/pass; Rosa R3 exact draw/discard/pass/enacted report + pass-L commitment; Ines/Greta R4 Liberal/Fascist commitment. Already said: asked Boris R1 report; asked Lena fallback; voted Ja R1/R2; requested exact R2 accounts; flagged Lena/Ines; asked Ines why commitment violated; said future vote against Ines pending account; asked Rosa fallback; supported Rosa/Boris test; requested Rosa exact report; asked Boris full report.

Suspects: Lena/Ines—R2 Lena–Ines enacted F; Lena claimed 2F+1L, discarded F, passed mixed; Ines claimed 2F received/enacted F. Contradiction unresolved. Greta untested; R4 outcome narrows Ines/Greta/draw. Open: Ines R2 exact received/discarded/enacted account + commitment-violation explanation; Lena R2 fallback nominee; Boris R1 exact draw/discard/pass; Rosa R3 exact draw/discard/pass/enacted report + pass-L commitment; Ines/Greta R4 Liberal/Fascist commitment. Already said: asked Boris R1 report; asked Lena fallback; voted Ja R1/R2; requested exact R2 accounts; flagged Lena/Ines; asked Ines why commitment violated; said future vote against Ines pending account; asked Rosa fallback; supported Rosa/Boris test; requested Rosa exact report; asked Boris full report; challenged reliance on promises and demanded pre-commitments.

Suspects: Lena/Ines—R2 Lena–Ines enacted F; Lena claimed 2F+1L, discarded F, passed mixed; Ines claimed 2F received/enacted F. Contradiction unresolved. Greta untested; R4 outcome narrows Ines/Greta/draw. Open: Ines R2 exact received/discarded/enacted account + commitment-violation explanation; Lena R2 fallback nominee; Boris R1 exact draw/discard/pass; Rosa R3 exact draw/discard/pass/enacted report + pass-L commitment; Ines/Greta R4 Liberal/Fascist commitment; Ines whether she withdraws Greta without full report. Already said: asked Boris R1 report; asked Lena fallback; voted Ja R1/R2; requested exact R2 accounts; flagged Lena/Ines; asked Ines why commitment violated; said future vote against Ines pending account; asked Rosa fallback; supported Rosa/Boris test; requested Rosa exact report; asked Boris full report; challenged reliance on promises and demanded pre-commitments.

Suspects: Lena/Ines—R2 Lena–Ines enacted F; Lena claimed 2F+1L, discarded F, passed mixed; Ines claimed 2F received/enacted F. Contradiction unresolved. R4 Ines/Greta government pending; outcome narrows Ines, Greta, or draw. Open: Ines R2 exact received/discarded/enacted account + why prior commitment was violated; Lena R2 fallback nominee; Boris R1 exact draw/discard/pass; Rosa R3 exact draw/discard/pass/enacted report; Ines/Greta R4 Liberal/Fascist pre-commitments; Ines whether she withdraws Greta without full report. Already said: requested Boris R1 report; asked Lena fallback; voted Ja R1/R2; requested exact R2 accounts; flagged Lena/Ines; asked Ines why commitment violated; said future vote against Ines pending account; asked Rosa fallback; supported Rosa/Boris test; requested Rosa exact report; asked Boris full report; challenged reliance on promises and demanded pre-commitments; asked Ines to withdraw Greta if Greta refuses full report; Greta committed exact R4 report, discard F when mixed, identify passed cards/enacted policy.

Suspects: Lena/Ines—R2 Lena–Ines enacted F; Lena claimed 2F+1L, discarded F, passed mixed; Ines claimed 2F received/enacted F. Contradiction unresolved. R4 Ines/Greta pending; outcome narrows Ines, Greta, or draw. Open: Ines R2 exact received/discarded/enacted account + why prior commitment violated; Lena R2 fallback nominee; Boris R1 exact draw/discard/pass; Rosa R3 exact draw/discard/pass/enacted report; Ines/Greta R4 Liberal/Fascist pre-commitments; Ines whether withdrawing Greta without full report. Already said: requested Boris R1 report; asked Lena fallback; voted Ja R1/R2; requested exact R2 accounts; flagged Lena/Ines; asked Ines why commitment violated; said future vote against Ines pending account; asked Rosa fallback; supported Rosa/Boris test; requested Rosa exact report; asked Boris full report; challenged reliance on promises and demanded pre-commitments; asked Ines to withdraw Greta if Greta refuses full report; Greta committed exact R4 report, discard F when mixed, identify passed cards/enacted policy.

Suspects: Ines/Lena—R2 Lena–Ines enacted F; unresolved conflicting accounts. Ines was Chancellor; Lena claimed 2F+1L and passed mixed, Ines's exact account absent. R4 Ines/Greta pending; F outcome narrows Ines, Greta, or draw. Open: Ines R2 exact received/discarded/enacted account + commitment violation; Lena R2 fallback; Boris R1 exact draw/discard/pass; Rosa R3 exact draw/discard/pass/enacted; R4 reports after enactment; Ines withdrawal condition if Greta refused (Greta did commit). Already said: requested Boris R1 report; asked Lena fallback; requested exact R2 accounts; flagged Lena/Ines; asked Ines why commitment violated; said future vote against Ines pending account; asked Rosa fallback/exact report; supported Rosa/Boris test; asked Boris full report; demanded pre-commitments; asked Ines to withdraw Greta if Greta refused; Greta committed exact R4 report and discard F from mixed.

Suspects: Ines/Lena—R2 Lena–Ines enacted F; conflicting accounts unresolved. Ines was Chancellor; Lena claimed 2F+1L, passed mixed; Ines exact account absent. Ines/Greta—R4 government enacted F; culprit is Ines, Greta, or draw. Pattern: Ines involved in both F enactments. Open: Ines R2 exact received/discarded/enacted account + commitment violation; Lena R2 fallback; Boris R1 exact draw/discard/pass; Rosa R3 exact draw/discard/pass/enacted; Ines R4 report and withdrawal condition if Greta refused; Greta R4 exact received/discarded/pass report. Need distinguish who discarded what in R4. Already said: requested Boris R1 report; asked Lena fallback; requested exact R2 accounts; flagged Lena/Ines; asked Ines why commitment violated; future vote against Ines pending account; asked Rosa fallback/exact report; supported Rosa/Boris test; asked Boris full report; demanded pre-commitments; asked Ines to withdraw Greta if Greta refused; Greta committed exact R4 report and discard F from mixed.

Suspects: Ines strongest—Chancellor R2 F and President R4 F; only repeat participant in both F governments. Greta—Chancellor R4 F, first government. Lena—President R2 F; R2 account unresolved. R4 culprit limited to Ines, Greta, or draw. Open: Ines R2 exact received/discarded/enacted account; whether R2 was 2F forced; Lena R2 fallback; Boris R1 exact draw/discard/pass; Rosa R3 exact draw/discard/pass/enacted; Ines R4 exact draw/discard/pass report; Greta R4 exact draw/discard/pass report; R4 mixed vs 2F distinction and who chose F. Already said: requested Boris R1 report; asked Lena fallback; requested exact R2 accounts; flagged Lena/Ines; asked Ines why commitment violated; future vote against Ines pending account; asked Rosa fallback/exact report; supported Rosa/Boris test; asked Boris full report; demanded pre-commitments; asked Ines withdraw Greta if Greta refused; Greta committed exact R4 report/discard F from mixed.

Suspects: Ines strongest—Chancellor R2 F and President R4 F; only repeat participant in both F governments; R4 commitment omitted 2F case and exact report still absent. Greta—Chancellor R4 F, first government. Lena—President R2 F; R2 account unresolved. R4 culprit limited to Ines, Greta, or draw. Open: Ines R2 exact received/discarded/enacted account; whether R2 was 2F forced; Lena R2 fallback; Boris R1 exact draw/discard/pass; Rosa R3 exact draw/discard/pass/enacted; Ines R4 exact draw/discard/pass; Greta R4 exact draw/discard/pass; R4 mixed vs 2F and who chose F. Already said: flagged Ines as leading suspect; requested R2/R4 exact reports and mixed-vs-2F distinction; asked Ines withdraw Greta absent reporting commitment; demanded pre-commitments; requested Boris/Rosa reports and Rosa fallback; supported Rosa/Boris test; asked Lena fallback; Greta committed exact R4 report/discard F from mixed; stated Ines and Greta must explain R4.

Suspects: Ines strongest—Chancellor R2 F and President R4 F; only repeat participant in both F governments; R4 commitment omitted 2F case and exact report absent. Greta—Chancellor R4 F, first government. Lena—President R2 F; R2 unresolved. R4 culprit limited to Ines, Greta, or draw. Open: Ines owes R2 exact received/discarded/enacted account and 2F-forced answer; Lena R2 fallback; Boris R1 exact draw/discard/pass; Rosa R3 exact draw/discard/pass/enacted; Ines and Greta R4 exact draw/discard/pass, mixed vs 2F, who chose F. Already said: Flagged Ines leading suspect; requested R2/R4 exact reports and mixed-vs-2F distinction; asked Ines withdraw Greta absent reporting commitment; demanded pre-commitments; requested Boris/Rosa reports and Rosa fallback; supported Rosa/Boris test; asked Lena fallback; Greta committed exact R4 report/discard F from mixed; stated Ines and Greta must explain R4; said Ines R4 commitment omitted 2F case and exact report absent.

Suspects: Ines strongest—R2 Chancellor F and R4 President F; only repeat participant in both F governments. R4: Ines/Greta responsible or unlucky draw; Ines omitted 2F-case commitment and exact report. Greta—R4 Chancellor F. Lena—R2 Chancellor? R2 President, F enactment; unresolved. Open: Ines owes exact R2 and R4 received/discarded/passed account, including whether R4 had 2F or mixed and who selected F. Greta owes exact R4 report, discard, and whether mixed/2F. Lena owes R2 exact account/fallback. Boris R1 report; Rosa R3 report/fallback. Already said: Ines leading suspect; demanded exact R2/R4 reports and mixed-vs-2F distinction; asked Ines withdraw Greta absent report; demanded pre-commitments; requested Boris/Rosa reports and Rosa fallback; supported Rosa/Boris test; asked Lena fallback; Greta committed exact R4 report/discard F from mixed; stated R4 Ines/Greta must explain; noted Ines R4 commitment omitted 2F case.

Suspects: Ines strongest—R2 Chancellor F and R4 President F; only repeat participant in both F governments. R4: Ines/Greta responsible or unlucky draw; Ines now claims 2L+1F, discarded L, passed L+F; Greta claims received 2F. Direct contradiction. Lena—R2 President, F enactment; unresolved. Open: Ines exact R2 transfer/discard account; Lena exact R2 account/fallback; Greta exact R4 report/discard and explanation of contradiction; Boris R1 report; Rosa R3 report/fallback. Already said: Ines leading suspect; demanded exact R2/R4 reports and mixed-vs-2F distinction; asked Ines withdraw Greta absent report; demanded pre-commitments; requested Boris/Rosa reports and Rosa fallback; supported Rosa/Boris test; asked Lena fallback; Greta committed exact R4 report/discard F from mixed; stated R4 Ines/Greta must explain; noted Ines R4 commitment omitted 2F case.

Suspects: Ines strongest—R2 Chancellor F and R4 President F; only repeat participant in both F governments. R4 Ines/Greta responsible or unlucky draw. Ines claims 2L+1F, discarded L, passed L+F; Greta claims received 2F: contradiction. Lena—R2 President in F government; unresolved. Open: Ines exact R2 transfer/discard; Lena exact R2 account/fallback; Greta exact R4 report/discard and contradiction explanation; Boris R1 report; Rosa R3 report/fallback. Ines owes explanation for R4 2F possibility and both F governments; Greta owes precise R4 account. Already said: Ines leading suspect; demanded exact R2/R4 reports and mixed-vs-2F distinction; asked Ines withdraw Greta absent report; demanded pre-commitments; requested Boris/Rosa reports and Rosa fallback; supported Rosa/Boris test; asked Lena fallback; Greta committed exact R4 report/discard F from mixed; stated R4 Ines/Greta must explain; noted Ines R4 commitment omitted 2F case; now Rosa identifies mechanical contradiction.

Suspects: Ines strongest—R2 Chancellor F and R4 President F; only repeat participant in both F governments. R4 Ines/Greta responsible or unlucky draw. Ines claims 2L+1F, discarded L, passed L+F; Greta claims received 2F: contradiction. Lena—R2 President in F government; now defending Greta by invoking possible 3F draw without resolving Ines’s stated hand. Open: Ines exact R2 transfer/discard; Lena exact R2 account/fallback; Greta exact R4 report/discard and contradiction explanation; Boris R1 report; Rosa R3 report/fallback. Ines must clarify whether her R4 hand was 2L+1F or 3F; those accounts cannot both support Greta receiving 2F. Greta owes precise R4 account. Already said: Ines leading suspect; demanded exact R2/R4 reports and mixed-vs-2F distinction; asked Ines withdraw Greta absent report; demanded pre-commitments; requested Boris/Rosa reports and Rosa fallback; supported Rosa/Boris test; asked Lena fallback; Greta committed exact R4 report/discard F from mixed; stated R4 Ines/Greta must explain; noted Ines R4 commitment omitted 2F case; now Rosa identifies mechanical contradiction.

Suspects: Ines strongest—R2 Chancellor F and R4 President F; only repeat participant in both F governments. R4 Ines/Greta responsible or unlucky draw. Ines claims 2L+1F, discarded L, passed L+F; Greta claims received 2F: contradiction. Lena—R2 President in F government; defended Greta via possible 3F draw without resolving Ines’s hand. Boris now opposes Ines, Lena, Greta governments pending accounts. Open: Ines exact R2 transfer/discard; Lena exact R2 account/fallback; Greta exact R4 report/discard and contradiction explanation; Boris R1 report; Rosa R3 report/fallback. Ines must clarify whether R4 hand was 2L+1F or 3F; accounts cannot both support Greta receiving 2F. Greta owes precise R4 account. Already said: Ines leading suspect; demanded exact R2/R4 reports and mixed-vs-2F distinction; asked Ines withdraw Greta absent report; demanded pre-commitments; requested Boris/Rosa reports and Rosa fallback; supported Rosa/Boris test; asked Lena fallback; Greta committed exact R4 report/discard F from mixed; stated R4 Ines/Greta must explain; noted Ines R4 commitment omitted 2F case; Rosa identified mechanical contradiction.

Suspect Ines strongest: R2 Chancellor in F government and R4 President in F government; only repeat participant in both F enactments. R4 Ines/Greta jointly accountable or unlucky draw. Ines claims R4 2L+1F, discarded L, passed L+F; Greta claims received 2F—contradiction. Lena: R2 President in F government; defended Greta via possible 3F draw without resolving Ines's account. Boris opposes Ines/Lena/Greta governments pending accounts. Open: Ines exact R2 transfer/discard and R4 hand (2L+1F vs 3F); Lena exact R2 account/fallback; Greta precise R4 report/discard and contradiction explanation; Boris R1 report; Rosa R3 report/fallback. Ines must withdraw Greta absent report; accounts cannot both support Greta receiving 2F. Already said: Ines leading suspect; demanded exact R2/R4 reports and mixed-vs-2F distinction; asked Ines withdraw Greta absent report; demanded pre-commitments; requested Boris/Rosa reports and Rosa fallback; supported Rosa/Boris test; asked Lena fallback; Greta committed exact R4 report/discard F from mixed; stated R4 Ines/Greta must explain; noted Ines R4 commitment omitted 2F case; Rosa identified mechanical contradiction.

Suspect Ines strongest: R2 Chancellor in F government and R4 President in F government; only repeat participant in both F enactments. R4 Ines/Greta jointly accountable or unlucky draw. Ines claims R4 2L+1F, discarded L, passed L+F; Greta claims received 2F—contradiction. Lena: R2 President in F government; defended Greta via possible 3F draw without resolving Ines's account. Boris opposes Ines/Lena/Greta governments pending accounts. Open: Ines exact R2 transfer/discard and R4 hand (2L+1F vs 3F); Lena exact R2 account/fallback; Greta precise R4 report/discard and contradiction explanation; Boris R1 report; Rosa R3 report/fallback. Ines must withdraw Greta absent report; accounts cannot both support Greta receiving 2F. Already said: Ines leading suspect; demanded exact R2/R4 reports and mixed-vs-2F distinction; asked Ines withdraw Greta absent report; demanded pre-commitments; requested Boris/Rosa reports and Rosa fallback; supported Rosa/Boris test; asked Lena fallback; Greta committed exact R4 report/discard F from mixed; stated R4 Ines/Greta must explain; noted Ines R4 commitment omitted 2F case; Rosa identified mechanical contradiction; recommended investigating Ines as repeat participant.

Suspect Ines: R2 Chancellor in F enactment and R4 President in F enactment; only repeat participant in both. R4 Ines/Greta claims conflict: Ines says 2L+1F, discarded L, passed L+F; Greta says received 2F. Lena: R2 President in F government; defended Greta despite contradiction. R4 Ines/Greta jointly accountable or unlucky draw. Open: Ines exact R2 transfer/discard; R4 exact hand/transfer; Lena exact R2 account; Greta precise R4 discard/received cards; Boris R1 report; Rosa R3 report. Investigation target/result, especially Lena. Already said: Ines leading suspect; demanded exact R2/R4 reports and mixed-vs-2F distinction; asked Ines withdraw Greta absent report; demanded precommitments; requested Boris/Rosa reports and Rosa fallback; supported Rosa/Boris test; asked Lena fallback; Greta committed R4 report; noted Ines omitted 2F commitment; noted Rosa mechanical contradiction; recommended scrutinizing repeat participant.

Suspect Ines: R2 Chancellor in F enactment + R4 President in F enactment; only repeat participant in both. R4 Ines/Greta accounts conflict; Ines says 2L+1F, discarded L, passed L+F; Greta says received 2F. Lena: R2 President in F government; defended Greta despite contradiction. R4 Ines/Greta jointly accountable or unlucky draw. Open: Ines owes exact R2 transfer/discard and R4 hand/transfer; Lena owes exact R2 account; Greta owes precise R4 received/discard; Boris R1 report; Rosa R3 report. Ines should precommit and investigate Lena; result pending. Already said: Ines leading suspect; demanded exact R2/R4 reports and mixed-vs-2F distinction; asked Ines withdraw Greta absent report; demanded precommitments; requested Boris/Rosa reports and Rosa fallback; supported Rosa/Boris test; asked Lena fallback; Greta committed R4 report; noted Ines omitted 2F commitment; noted Rosa mechanical contradiction; recommended scrutinizing repeat participant.

Suspect Ines: R2 Chancellor in F enactment + R4 President in F enactment; only repeat participant in both. R4 Ines/Greta accounts conflict; Ines says 2L+1F, discarded L, passed L+F; Greta says received 2F. Lena: R2 President in F government; defended Greta despite contradiction. R4 Ines/Greta jointly accountable or unlucky draw. Ines now commits investigate Otto, despite Lena also proposing Otto; Lena remains more relevant due R2 F government. Open: Ines owes exact R2 transfer/discard and R4 hand/transfer; Lena owes exact R2 account; Greta owes precise R4 received/discard; Boris R1 report; Rosa R3 report. Ines should precommit and investigate Lena; result pending. Already said: Ines leading suspect; demanded exact R2/R4 reports and mixed-vs-2F distinction; asked Ines withdraw Greta absent report; demanded precommitments; requested Boris/Rosa reports and Rosa fallback; supported Rosa/Boris test; asked Lena fallback; Greta committed R4 report; noted Ines omitted 2F commitment; noted Rosa mechanical contradiction; recommended scrutinizing repeat participant; challenged Ines investigation target and favored Lena.

Suspects: Ines—R2 Chancellor and R4 President in the two Fascist enactments; only repeat participant; R4 card accounts conflict. Lena—R2 President in Fascist government; defended Greta despite contradiction. Greta—R4 Chancellor with conflicting account. Ines/Greta jointly accountable or unlucky draw. Open: Ines owes exact R2 transfer/discard and R4 hand/transfer; Lena exact R2 account; Greta precise R4 received/discard; Boris R1 report; Rosa R3 report; Otto owes whether he cast lone Nein in R4. Ines investigating Otto; result pending. Already said: Ines leading suspect; demanded exact R2/R4 reports and mixed-vs-2F distinction; asked Ines withdraw Greta absent report; demanded precommitments; requested Boris/Rosa reports and Rosa fallback; supported Rosa/Boris test; asked Lena fallback; Greta committed R4 report; noted Ines omitted 2F commitment; noted Rosa mechanical contradiction; recommended scrutinizing repeat participant; challenged Ines target and favored Lena.

Suspects: Ines—R2 Chancellor and R4 President in both Fascist enactments; only repeat participant; R4 accounts conflict. Lena—R2 President; defended Greta despite contradiction. Greta—R4 Chancellor; conflicts with Ines. Ines/Greta jointly accountable or unlucky draw. Open: Ines exact R2 transfer/discard and R4 hand/transfer; Lena exact R2 account; Greta precise R4 received/discard; Boris R1 report; Rosa R3 report; Otto whether lone Nein in R4. Ines investigating Otto; result pending. Already said: Ines leading suspect; demanded exact R2/R4 reports and mixed-vs-2F distinction; asked Ines withdraw Greta absent report; demanded precommitments; requested Boris/Rosa reports and Rosa fallback; supported Rosa/Boris test; asked Lena fallback; Greta committed R4 report; noted Ines omitted 2F commitment; noted Rosa mechanical contradiction; recommended scrutinizing repeat participant; challenged Ines target and favored Lena.

Suspects: - Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in both Fascist enactments; R4 transfer account disputed/incomplete. - Lena: R2 President; defended Greta despite Rosa’s mechanical objection. - Greta: R4 Chancellor; account conflicts with Ines. - Ines/Greta jointly accountable or unlucky draw. Open/unanswered: - Ines: exact R2 transfer/discard; exact R4 hand, discard, passed cards; two-F case. - Lena: exact R2 draw/discard/passed cards. - Greta: precise R4 received cards/discard. - Boris: R1 report. - Rosa: R3 report. - Otto: whether he cast lone Nein in R4. - Ines: Otto investigation result pending. Already said: - Ines leading suspect; repeat participant in both F enactments. - Demanded exact R2/R4 reports and mixed-vs-2F distinction. - Asked Ines withdraw Greta absent report. - Demanded precommitments; asked Boris/Rosa reports and Rosa fallback. - Supported Rosa/Boris test; asked Lena fallback. - Greta committed R4 report. - Noted Ines omitted 2F commitment. - Noted Rosa mechanical contradiction. - Recommended scrutinizing repeat participant. - Challenged Ines target; favored investigating Lena. - Asked Otto whether lone Nein in R4. - Warned Otto investigation cannot resolve R4 contradiction.

Suspects/evidence: - Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in both Fascist enactments; R4 transfer account disputed/incomplete; repeat participant strongest concern. - Greta: R4 Chancellor; account conflicts with Ines. - Lena: R2 President; defended Greta despite Rosa’s mechanical objection. - Ines/Greta: jointly accountable for R4 or unlucky draw. Open answers: - Ines: exact R2 transfer/discard; exact R4 hand, discard, passed cards; mixed-vs-2F commitment; Otto investigation result. - Lena: exact R2 draw/discard/passed cards. - Greta: precise R4 received cards/discard. - Boris: R1 report. - Rosa: R3 report and fallback. - Otto: whether he cast lone Nein in R4. Already said: - Ines leading suspect; repeat participation in both F enactments. - Demanded exact R2/R4 reports and mixed-vs-2F distinction. - Asked Ines withdraw Greta absent report. - Demanded precommitments; asked Boris/Rosa reports and Rosa fallback. - Supported Rosa/Boris test; asked Lena fallback. - Greta committed R4 report. - Noted Ines omitted 2F commitment. - Noted Rosa mechanical contradiction. - Recommended scrutinizing repeat participant. - Challenged Ines target; favored investigating Lena. - Asked Otto about lone Nein in R4. - Warned Otto result cannot resolve R4 contradiction.

Suspects/evidence: - Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in both Fascist enactments; R4 transfer disputed/incomplete; strongest repeat-government concern. - Greta: R4 Chancellor; account conflicts with Ines. - Lena: R2 President; defended Greta despite Rosa mechanical objection. - Ines/Greta: jointly accountable for R4 or unlucky draw. - Otto: claims lone Nein on R4; investigation result may inform party membership, not R4 cards. Open answers: - Ines: exact R2 transfer/discard; exact R4 hand, discard, passed cards; mixed-vs-2F commitment; Otto investigation result. - Lena: exact R2 draw/discard/passed cards. - Greta: precise R4 received cards/discard. - Boris: R1 report. - Rosa: R3 report and fallback. Already said: - Ines leading suspect; repeat participation in both F enactments. - Demanded exact R2/R4 reports and mixed-vs-2F distinction. - Asked Ines withdraw Greta absent report. - Demanded precommitments; asked Boris/Rosa reports and Rosa fallback. - Supported Rosa/Boris test; asked Lena fallback. - Greta committed R4 report. - Noted Ines omitted 2F commitment. - Noted Rosa mechanical contradiction. - Recommended scrutinizing repeat participant. - Challenged Ines target; favored investigating Lena. - Asked Otto about lone Nein in R4. - Warned Otto result cannot resolve R4 contradiction.

Suspects/evidence: - Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in both Fascist enactments; R4 transfer disputed/incomplete; strongest repeat-government concern. - Greta: R4 Chancellor; account conflicts with Ines. - Lena: R2 President; defended Greta despite Rosa mechanical objection. - Ines/Greta: jointly accountable for R4 or unlucky draw. - Otto: claims lone Nein on R4; investigation result may inform party membership, not R4 cards. Open answers: - Ines: exact R2 transfer/discard; exact R4 hand, discard, passed cards; mixed-vs-2F commitment; Otto investigation result. - Lena: exact R2 draw/discard/passed cards. - Greta: precise R4 received cards/discard. - Boris: R1 report. - Rosa: R3 report and fallback. Already said: - Ines leading suspect; repeat participation in both F enactments. - Demanded exact R2/R4 reports and mixed-vs-2F distinction. - Asked Ines withdraw Greta absent report. - Demanded precommitments; asked Boris/Rosa reports and Rosa fallback. - Supported Rosa/Boris test; asked Lena fallback. - Greta committed R4 report. - Noted Ines omitted 2F commitment. - Noted Rosa mechanical contradiction. - Recommended scrutinizing repeat participant. - Challenged Ines target; favored investigating Lena. - Asked Otto about lone Nein in R4. - Warned Otto result cannot resolve R4 contradiction.

Suspects/evidence: - Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in both Fascist enactments; R4 transfer disputed/incomplete; strongest repeat-government concern. - Greta: R4 Chancellor; account conflicts with Ines. - Lena: R2 President; defended Greta despite Rosa mechanical objection. - Ines/Greta: jointly accountable for R4 or unlucky draw. - Otto: claims lone Nein on R4; investigation result may inform party membership, not R4 cards. Open answers: - Ines: exact R2 transfer/discard; exact R4 hand, discard, passed cards; mixed-vs-2F commitment; Otto investigation result. - Lena: exact R2 draw/discard/passed cards. - Greta: precise R4 received cards/discard; nominee and fixed fallback. - Boris: R1 report. - Rosa: R3 report and fallback. Already said: - Ines leading suspect; repeat participation in both F enactments. - Demanded exact R2/R4 reports and mixed-vs-2F distinction. - Asked Ines withdraw Greta absent report. - Demanded precommitments; asked Boris/Rosa reports and Rosa fallback. - Supported Rosa/Boris test; asked Lena fallback. - Greta committed R4 report. - Noted Ines omitted 2F commitment. - Noted Rosa mechanical contradiction. - Recommended scrutinizing repeat participant. - Challenged Ines target; favored investigating Lena. - Asked Otto about lone Nein in R4. - Warned Otto result cannot resolve R4 contradiction. - Proposed Boris or Rosa as lower-risk nominee with clean Liberal enactment history.

Suspects/evidence: - Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in both Fascist enactments; R4 transfer disputed/incomplete; strongest repeat-government concern. - Greta: R4 Chancellor; exact account still needed; conflicts with Ines. - Lena: R2 President; defended Greta despite Rosa mechanical objection. - Ines/Greta: jointly accountable for R4 or unlucky draw. - Otto: claims lone Nein on R4; investigation result may inform party membership, not R4 cards. Open questions: - Ines: exact R2 transfer/discard; exact R4 hand, discard, passed cards; mixed-vs-2F commitment; Otto investigation result. - Lena: exact R2 draw/discard/passed cards. - Greta: precise R4 received cards/discard; nominee and fixed fallback. - Boris: R1 report. - Rosa: R3 report and fallback. Already said: - Ines leading suspect; repeat participation in both F enactments. - Demanded exact R2/R4 reports and mixed-vs-2F distinction. - Asked Ines withdraw Greta absent report. - Demanded precommitments; asked Boris/Rosa reports and Rosa fallback. - Supported Rosa/Boris test; asked Lena fallback. - Greta committed R4 report. - Noted Ines omitted 2F commitment. - Noted Rosa mechanical contradiction. - Recommended scrutinizing repeat participant. - Challenged Ines target; favored investigating Lena. - Asked Otto about lone Nein in R4. - Warned Otto result cannot resolve R4 contradiction. - Proposed Boris or Rosa as lower-risk nominee with clean Liberal enactment history. - Current proposal: Greta President, Rosa Chancellor; Greta’s R4 Fascist government remains unresolved.

Suspects/evidence: - Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in both Fascist enactments; strongest repeat-government concern; R4 transfer disputed. - Greta: R4 Chancellor in Fascist enactment; exact account unresolved. - Lena: R2 President; defended Greta despite Rosa’s mechanical objection. - R4 responsibility narrowed to Ines, Greta, or unlucky draw. - Otto: claims lone Nein on R4; investigation result may inform party membership, not R4 cards. Open questions: - Ines owes exact R2 transfer/discard and R4 hand/discard/passed cards; mixed-vs-2F commitment; Otto investigation result. - Lena owes exact R2 draw/discard/passed cards and fallback. - Greta owes precise R4 received/discarded cards, nominee commitment, and fallback. - Boris owes R1 report; Rosa owes R3 report and fallback. - Current government: Greta must precommit fallback; Rosa must commit to Liberal from any mixed hand. Already said: - Ines leading suspect; repeat participation in both Fascist enactments. - Demanded exact R2/R4 reports and mixed-vs-2F distinction. - Asked Ines withdraw Greta absent report. - Demanded precommitments; asked Boris/Rosa reports and Rosa fallback. - Supported Rosa/Boris test; asked Lena fallback. - Greta committed R4 report; Ines omitted 2F commitment. - Noted Rosa mechanical contradiction. - Recommended scrutinizing repeat participant. - Challenged Ines target; favored investigating Lena. - Asked Otto about lone Nein in R4. - Warned Otto result cannot resolve R4 contradiction. - Proposed Boris or Rosa as lower-risk nominee with clean Liberal enactment history.

Suspects/evidence: - Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in both Fascist enactments; strongest repeat-government concern; R4 transfer disputed. - Greta: R4 Chancellor in Fascist enactment; account conflicts with Ines; current president must be scrutinized. - Lena: R2 President; defended Greta despite Rosa’s mechanical objection. - R4 responsibility narrowed to Ines, Greta, or unlucky draw. - Otto: claims lone Nein on R4; investigation result absent. Open questions: - Ines: exact R2 transfer/discard, R4 hand/discard/passed cards, mixed-vs-2F commitment, Otto result. - Lena: exact R2 draw/discard/passed cards and fallback. - Greta: R4 precise cards; current three-Fascist-case reporting commitment; fallback accountability. - Boris: R1 report. Rosa: R3 report and fallback. Already said: - Ines leading suspect; repeat participation in both Fascist enactments. - Demanded exact R2/R4 reports and mixed-vs-2F distinction. - Asked Ines withdraw Greta absent report. - Demanded precommitments; asked Boris/Rosa reports and Rosa fallback. - Supported Rosa/Boris test; asked Lena fallback. - Greta committed R4 report; Ines omitted 2F commitment. - Noted Rosa mechanical contradiction. - Recommended scrutinizing repeat participant. - Challenged Ines target; favored investigating Lena. - Asked Otto about lone Nein in R4. - Warned Otto result cannot resolve R4 contradiction. - Proposed Boris or Rosa as lower-risk nominee with clean Liberal enactment history. - Asked Greta to precommit on a three-Fascist draw.

Suspects/evidence: - Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in both Fascist enactments; strongest repeat-government concern. R4 transfer disputed. - Greta: R4 Chancellor in Fascist enactment; current President; exact report/three-Fascist commitment pending. - Lena: R2 President; defended Greta despite Rosa's mechanical objection. - R4 responsibility narrowed to Ines, Greta, or unlucky draw. - Otto: claims lone Nein on R4; investigation result absent. Open questions/unanswered: - Greta: R4 exact cards/discard/passed cards; commitment to report three-Fascist draw; fallback accountability. - Ines: exact R2 and R4 transfers/discards; mixed-vs-2F commitment; Otto result. - Lena: exact R2 cards/discard/passed cards and fallback. - Boris: R1 report. Rosa: R3 report and fallback. Otto: investigation result/lone Nein verification. Already said: - Ines leading suspect; repeat participation in both Fascist enactments. - Demanded exact R2/R4 reports and mixed-vs-2F distinction. - Asked Ines withdraw Greta absent report. - Demanded precommitments; asked Boris/Rosa reports and Rosa fallback. - Supported Rosa/Boris test; asked Lena fallback. - Greta committed R4 report; Ines omitted 2F commitment. - Noted Rosa mechanical contradiction. - Recommended scrutinizing repeat participant. - Challenged Ines target; favored investigating Lena. - Asked Otto about lone Nein in R4. - Warned Otto result cannot resolve R4 contradiction. - Proposed Boris or Rosa as lower-risk nominee with clean Liberal enactment history. - Asked Greta to precommit on a three-Fascist draw.

Suspects/evidence: - Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in both Fascist enactments; strongest repeat-government concern. R4 transfer disputed. - Greta: R4 Chancellor in Fascist enactment; current President; exact report/three-Fascist commitment pending. - Lena: R2 President; defended Greta despite Rosa's mechanical objection. - R4 responsibility narrowed to Ines, Greta, or unlucky draw. - Otto: claims lone Nein on R4; investigation result absent. Open questions/unanswered: - Greta: R4 exact cards/discard/passed cards; response if three Fascists. - Rosa: precommitment to exact cards/discard/passed cards and response if offered two Fascists. - Ines: exact R2/R4 transfers/discards; mixed-vs-2F commitment; Otto result. - Lena: exact R2 cards/discard/passed cards and fallback. - Boris: R1 report. Rosa: R3 report and fallback. Otto: investigation result/lone Nein verification. Already said: - Ines leading suspect; repeat participation in both Fascist enactments. - Demanded exact R2/R4 reports and mixed-vs-2F distinction. - Asked Ines withdraw Greta absent report. - Demanded precommitments; asked Boris/Rosa reports and Rosa fallback. - Supported Rosa/Boris test; asked Lena fallback. - Greta committed R4 report; Ines omitted 2F commitment. - Noted Rosa mechanical contradiction. - Recommended scrutinizing repeat participant. - Challenged Ines target; favored investigating Lena. - Asked Otto about lone Nein in R4. - Warned Otto result cannot resolve R4 contradiction. - Proposed Boris or Rosa as lower-risk nominee with clean Liberal enactment history. - Asked Greta to precommit on a three-Fascist draw. - New: demand Rosa precommit to her discard/pass account and response before election.

Suspects/evidence: - Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in both Fascist enactments; strongest repeat-government concern. R4 transfer disputed. - Greta: R4 Chancellor in Fascist enactment; current President; exact report/three-Fascist commitment pending. - Lena: R2 President; defended Greta despite Rosa's mechanical objection. - R4 responsibility narrowed to Ines, Greta, or unlucky draw. - Otto: claims lone Nein on R4; investigation result absent. - Current Greta/Rosa government could enact F3; Hitler-election threshold now active. Open questions/unanswered: - Greta: R4 exact cards/discard/passed cards; response if three Fascists. - Rosa: precommitment to exact cards/discard/passed cards and response if offered two Fascists. - Ines: exact R2/R4 transfers/discards; mixed-vs-2F commitment; Otto result. - Lena: exact R2 cards/discard/passed cards and fallback. - Boris: R1 report. Rosa: R3 report and fallback. Otto: investigation result/lone Nein verification. Already said: - Ines leading suspect; repeat participation in both Fascist enactments. - Demanded exact R2/R4 reports and mixed-vs-2F distinction. - Asked Ines withdraw Greta absent report. - Demanded precommitments; asked Boris/Rosa reports and Rosa fallback. - Supported Rosa/Boris test; asked Lena fallback. - Greta committed R4 report; Ines omitted 2F commitment. - Noted Rosa mechanical contradiction. - Recommended scrutinizing repeat participant. - Challenged Ines target; favored investigating Lena. - Asked Otto about lone Nein in R4. - Warned Otto result cannot resolve R4 contradiction. - Proposed Boris or Rosa as lower-risk nominee with clean Liberal enactment history. - Asked Greta to precommit on a three-Fascist draw. - New: demand Rosa precommit to her discard/pass account and response before election. - Require Greta/Rosa exact accounts before supporting current government.

Suspects/evidence: - Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in both Fascist enactments; strongest repeat-government concern; R4 transfer disputed and exact reports absent. - Greta: R4 Chancellor in Fascist enactment; current President; card account conflicts with Ines, though committed to exact report. - Lena: R2 President; defended Greta despite Rosa's mechanical objection. - R4 responsibility narrowed to Ines, Greta, or unlucky draw. - Otto: claims lone Nein on R4; investigation result absent. - Current Greta/Rosa government is a controlled test; F3 Hitler-election threshold active. Open questions/unanswered: - Greta: R4 exact cards/discard/passed cards; report after current government, including three-F draw. - Rosa: exact current draw/discard/pass report; mixed-hand and two-F response. - Ines: exact R2/R4 transfers/discards; 2F commitment; Otto result. - Lena: exact R2 cards/discard/passed cards and fallback. - Boris: R1 report. Rosa: R3 report/fallback. Otto: investigation result. Already said: - Ines leading suspect from repeat participation in both F enactments. - Demanded exact R2/R4 reports and mixed-vs-2F distinction. - Asked Ines withdraw Greta absent report; challenged Ines investigation target; favored Lena. - Asked Otto about lone Nein; warned result cannot resolve R4 contradiction. - Supported Rosa/Boris lower-risk test; asked precommitments and exact accounts. - Asked Greta to precommit on three-F draw; asked Rosa exact-report and mixed-hand commitment. - Current vote: ja for Greta/Rosa controlled test.

Suspects/evidence: - Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President in both earlier Fascist enactments; strongest repeat-government concern; R4 transfer disputed. - Greta: R4 Chancellor in Fascist enactment and R5 President; now involved in two consecutive F enactments; exact R4/R5 account needed. - Rosa: R5 Chancellor in new Fascist enactment; now directly implicated with Greta; exact R5 account needed. - R4 responsibility narrowed to Ines, Greta, or unlucky draw. - Lena: R2 President; defended Greta despite Rosa's mechanical objection. - Otto: claims lone Nein on R4; investigation result absent. - Three Fascist policies now enacted: Hitler-election threshold active. Open questions/unanswered: - Greta: exact R4 cards/discard/passed cards; exact R5 draw, discard, and passed card; three-F precommitment/report. - Rosa: exact R5 draw/discard/pass report; mixed-hand versus two-F response. - Ines: exact R2/R4 transfers/discards; 2F commitment; Otto result. - Lena: exact R2 cards/discard/passed cards and fallback. - Boris: R1 report. Rosa: R3 report/fallback. Otto: investigation result. Already said: - Ines leading suspect from repeat participation in F enactments. - Demanded exact R2/R4 reports and mixed-vs-2F distinction. - Asked Ines withdraw Greta absent report; challenged Ines investigation target; favored Lena. - Asked Otto about lone Nein; warned result cannot resolve R4 contradiction. - Supported Rosa/Boris lower-risk test; asked precommitments and exact accounts. - Asked Greta to precommit on three-F draw; asked Rosa exact-report and mixed-hand commitment. - Voted ja for Greta/Rosa controlled test.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: Chancellor R4 and President R5, both F enactments; only player in both consecutive F governments; exact R4/R5 reports absent. - Ines: Chancellor R2 + President R4, both earlier F enactments; R4 transfer disputed; strongest historical repeat-government suspect. - Rosa: R5 Chancellor, directly implicated with Greta; exact R5 report absent. - R4 narrowed to Ines, Greta, or unlucky draw. - Lena: R2 President; defended Greta despite Rosa’s mechanical objection. - Otto: claims lone Nein R4; investigation result absent. - Three F enacted; Hitler-election threshold active. Open questions/unanswered: - Greta: exact R4/R5 draws, discards, passed cards; three-F report; owes Otto/room. - Rosa: exact R5 draw/discard/pass; owes Otto/room. - Ines: exact R2/R4 transfers/discards; 2F case; Otto result. - Lena: exact R2 cards/report. - Boris: R1 report. Rosa: R3 report. Already said: - Ines leading suspect from repeat F participation; challenged Ines investigation target and favored Lena. - Demanded exact R2/R4/R5 reports and mixed-vs-2F distinction. - Asked Ines withdraw Greta absent report; asked Otto about lone Nein and warned result cannot resolve R4. - Supported Rosa/Boris lower-risk test; requested precommitments; voted Ja Greta/Rosa. - Now: Greta primary suspect; oppose future Greta governments until R5 account.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: Chancellor R4 + President R5, both F; only player in both consecutive F governments; R4/R5 accounts unresolved. - Rosa: Chancellor R5, directly implicated with Greta; exact R5 draw/discard/pass unresolved. - Ines: Chancellor R2 + President R4, both F; R4 transfer disputed; historical repeat-government suspect. - R4 narrowed to Ines, Greta, or unlucky draw; R5 narrowed to Greta, Rosa, or unlucky draw. - Lena: R2 President; defended Greta despite Rosa mechanical objection. - Otto: claims lone Nein R4; investigation result absent and cannot resolve R4. - Three F enacted; Hitler-election threshold active. Open questions/unanswered: - Greta: exact R4/R5 draws, discards, passed cards; owes Otto/room. - Rosa: exact R5 draw/discard/pass; owes Otto/room. - Ines: exact R2/R4 transfers/discards; investigation target/result. - Lena: exact R2 cards/report. - Boris: R1 report. Rosa: R3 report. Already said: - Ines leading suspect from repeat F participation; challenged Ines investigation target and favored Lena. - Demanded exact R2/R4/R5 reports and mixed-vs-2F distinction. - Asked Ines withdraw Greta absent report; asked Otto about lone Nein and warned result cannot resolve R4. - Supported Rosa/Boris lower-risk test; requested precommitments; voted Ja Greta/Rosa. - Greta primary suspect; oppose future Greta governments until R5 account.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: Chancellor R4 + President R5, both F; only player in both consecutive F governments. R5 says F-F-L and passed F-L; Rosa says received F-F. One account is false. - Rosa: Chancellor R5, directly implicated; says Greta passed F-F, discarded one F, enacted the other. Exact transfer/discard unresolved. - Ines: Chancellor R2 + President R4, both F; repeat-government suspect. R4 transfer/discard and investigation details unresolved. - R4 narrowed to Ines, Greta, or unlucky draw; R5 narrowed to Greta, Rosa, or unlucky draw. - Three F enacted; Hitler-election threshold active. Open questions/unanswered: - Greta owes exact R4 report and R5 draw, discard, and passed cards; reconcile her mixed-hand claim with Rosa's F-F claim. - Rosa owes exact R5 cards received and which F she discarded. - Ines owes exact R2/R4 transfers, discards, and investigation target/result. - Lena owes exact R2 report; Boris R1 report; Rosa R3 report. - Otto's claimed lone Nein R4 and investigation result remain unresolved. Already said: - Ines leading suspect from repeat F participation; challenged Ines investigation target and favored Lena. - Demanded exact R2/R4/R5 reports and mixed-vs-2F distinction. - Asked Ines withdraw Greta absent report; asked Otto about lone Nein and warned result cannot resolve R4. - Supported Rosa/Boris lower-risk test; requested precommitments; voted Ja Greta/Rosa. - Greta primary suspect; oppose future Greta governments until R5 account resolved.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: Chancellor R4 + President R5, both F; only player in both consecutive F governments. R5 account conflicts with Rosa's F-F receipt claim. - Rosa: Chancellor R5, directly implicated; says Greta passed F-F, discarded one F, enacted the other. - Ines: Chancellor R2 + President R4, both F; repeat-government suspect. R4 transfer/discard unresolved. - R4 narrowed to Ines, Greta, or unlucky draw; R5 narrowed to Greta, Rosa, or unlucky draw. - Three F enacted; Hitler-election threshold active. Open questions/unanswered: - Greta: exact R4 report; exact R5 draw, discard, passed cards; reconcile mixed-hand claim with Rosa's F-F claim. - Rosa: exact R5 cards received and which F discarded. - Ines: exact R2/R4 transfers, discards, investigation target/result. - Lena: exact R2 report; Boris: R1 report; Rosa: R3 report. - Otto: lone Nein R4 and investigation result unresolved; result cannot resolve R4. Already said: - Ines leading suspect from repeat F participation; challenged Ines investigation target and favored Lena. - Demanded exact R2/R4/R5 reports and mixed-vs-2F distinction. - Asked Ines withdraw Greta absent report; asked Otto about lone Nein and warned result cannot resolve R4. - Supported Rosa/Boris lower-risk test; requested precommitments; voted Ja Greta/Rosa. - Greta primary suspect; oppose future Greta governments until R5 account resolved. - Stated coherence alone does not exonerate Greta; Greta/Rosa jointly implicated by conflicting R5 accounts.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: Chancellor R4 + President R5, both F; only player in both consecutive F governments; R5 account conflicts with Rosa's F-F receipt claim. - Rosa: Chancellor R5; says Greta passed F-F, discarded one F, enacted F; directly conflicts with Greta. - Ines: Chancellor R2 + President R4, both F; repeat-government suspect; R4 transfer/discard unresolved. - R4 narrowed Ines/Greta/unlucky draw; R5 narrowed Greta/Rosa/unlucky draw. - 3 F enacted; Hitler-election threshold active. Open questions/unanswered: - Greta: exact R4 report; reconcile R5 mixed-hand report with Rosa's F-F claim. - Rosa: exact R5 cards received and discarded F. - Ines: exact R2/R4 transfers/discards; promised Otto investigation result. - Lena: exact R2 report; Boris: R1 report; Rosa: R3 report. - Otto: lone Nein R4 and investigation result unresolved; result cannot resolve R4. Already said: - Ines leading suspect from repeat F participation; challenged investigation target, favored Lena. - Demanded exact R2/R4/R5 reports and mixed-vs-2F distinction. - Asked Ines withdraw Greta absent report; asked Otto about lone Nein; warned investigation result cannot resolve R4. - Supported Rosa/Boris lower-risk test; requested precommitments; voted Ja Greta/Rosa. - Greta primary suspect; oppose future Greta governments until R5 resolved. - Greta/Rosa jointly implicated by conflicting R5 accounts; coherence alone does not exonerate Greta. - New: exclude both Greta and Rosa from next government while R5 contradiction stands.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: Chancellor R4 + President R5, both F; only player in consecutive F governments. R5 account conflicts with Rosa’s F-F receipt claim. - Rosa: Chancellor R5; claims Greta passed F-F, discarded one F, enacted F; directly conflicts with Greta. - Ines: Chancellor R2 + President R4, both F; repeat-government suspect; R4 transfer/discard unresolved. - R4 narrowed Ines/Greta/unlucky draw; R5 narrowed Greta/Rosa/unlucky draw. - 3 F enacted; Hitler-election threshold active. Open questions: - Greta: exact R4 report; reconcile R5 mixed-hand report with Rosa’s F-F claim. - Rosa: exact R5 cards received/discarded. - Ines: exact R2/R4 transfers/discards; promised Otto investigation result. - Lena: exact R2 report; Boris: R1 report; Rosa: R3 report. - Otto: lone Nein R4 and investigation result unresolved; result cannot resolve R4. Already said: - Ines leading suspect from repeat F participation; challenged investigation target, favored Lena. - Demanded exact R2/R4/R5 reports and mixed-vs-2F distinction. - Asked Ines withdraw Greta absent report; asked Otto about lone Nein; warned investigation result cannot resolve R4. - Supported Rosa/Boris lower-risk test; requested precommitments; voted Ja Greta/Rosa. - Greta primary suspect; oppose future Greta governments until R5 resolved. - Greta/Rosa jointly implicated by conflicting R5 accounts; coherence alone does not exonerate Greta. - Exclude both Greta and Rosa from next government while R5 contradiction stands.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: Chancellor R4 + President R5, both F; only consecutive-F government player. R5 says F-L draw, passed F; conflicts Rosa’s F-F receipt claim. - Rosa: Chancellor R5; says Greta passed F-F and discarded F; directly conflicts Greta. - Ines: Chancellor R2 + President R4, both F; repeat-government suspect; R4 transfer/discard unresolved. - R4 narrowed Ines/Greta/unlucky draw; R5 narrowed Greta/Rosa/unlucky draw. - 3 F enacted; Hitler-election threshold active. Open questions: - Greta: exact R4 report; reconcile R5 mixed-hand report with Rosa’s F-F claim. - Rosa: exact R5 cards received/discarded. - Ines: exact R2/R4 transfers/discards; promised Otto investigation result. - Lena: exact R2 report; Boris: R1 report; Rosa: R3 report. - Otto: lone Nein R4 and investigation result unresolved; result cannot resolve R4. Already said: - Ines leading suspect from repeat F participation; challenged investigation target, favored Lena. - Demanded exact R2/R4/R5 reports and mixed-vs-2F distinction. - Asked Ines withdraw Greta absent report; asked Otto about lone Nein; warned investigation result cannot resolve R4. - Supported Rosa/Boris lower-risk test; requested precommitments; voted Ja Greta/Rosa. - Greta primary suspect; oppose future Greta governments until R5 resolved. - Greta/Rosa jointly implicated by conflicting R5 accounts; coherence alone does not exonerate Greta. - Exclude both Greta and Rosa from next government while R5 contradiction stands.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: Chancellor R4 + President R5, both F; only consecutive-F government player. R5 claims F-L draw/passed F, conflicts Rosa’s F-F receipt claim. - Rosa: Chancellor R5; claims Greta passed F-F and discarded F; directly conflicts Greta. - Ines: Chancellor R2 + President R4, both F; repeat-government suspect; R4 transfer/discard unresolved. - R4 narrowed Ines/Greta/unlucky draw; R5 narrowed Greta/Rosa/unlucky draw. - 3 F enacted; Hitler-election threshold active. Open questions: - Otto owes identity/reason for lone Nein on Greta–Rosa; investigation result still unresolved and cannot resolve R4. - Greta owes exact R4 report and reconciliation of R5 mixed-hand claim with Rosa. - Rosa owes exact R5 cards received/discarded. - Ines owes exact R2/R4 transfers/discards and promised investigation result. - Lena R2 report; Boris R1 report; Rosa R3 report remain unverified. Already said: - Ines leading suspect from repeat F participation; challenged investigation target, favored Lena. - Demanded exact R2/R4/R5 reports and mixed-vs-2F distinction. - Asked Ines withdraw Greta absent report; asked Otto about lone Nein; warned investigation cannot resolve R4. - Supported Rosa/Boris lower-risk test; requested precommitments; voted Ja Greta/Rosa. - Greta primary suspect; oppose future Greta governments until R5 resolved. - Greta/Rosa jointly implicated by conflicting R5 accounts; coherence does not exonerate Greta. - Exclude Greta and Rosa from next government while R5 contradiction stands.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: Chancellor R4 + President R5, both F; only consecutive-F government player. R5 claims F-L draw/passed F, conflicts Rosa’s F-F receipt claim. - Rosa: Chancellor R5; claims Greta passed F-F and discarded F; directly conflicts Greta. - Ines: Chancellor R2 + President R4, both F; repeat-government suspect; R4 transfer/discard unresolved. - R4 narrowed Ines/Greta/unlucky draw; R5 narrowed Greta/Rosa/unlucky draw. - 3 F enacted; Hitler-election threshold active. Open questions: - Otto owes confirmation of lone Nein and investigation result; investigation cannot resolve R4. - Greta owes exact R4 report and reconciliation of R5 mixed-hand claim with Rosa. - Rosa owes exact R5 cards received/discarded. - Ines owes exact R2/R4 transfers/discards and promised investigation result. - Lena R2 report; Boris R1 report; Rosa R3 report unverified. Already said: - Ines leading suspect from repeat F participation; challenged investigation target, favored Lena. - Demanded exact R2/R4/R5 reports and mixed-vs-2F distinction. - Asked Ines withdraw Greta absent report; asked Otto about lone Nein; warned investigation cannot resolve R4. - Supported Rosa/Boris lower-risk test; requested precommitments; voted Ja Greta/Rosa. - Greta primary suspect; oppose future Greta governments until R5 resolved. - Greta/Rosa jointly implicated by conflicting R5 accounts; coherence does not exonerate Greta. - Exclude Greta and Rosa from next government while R5 contradiction stands. - Lena now claims Ja on Greta-Rosa; Otto must verify before her claim carries weight.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: Chancellor R4 + President R5, both F; only consecutive-F government player. R5 claims F-L draw/passed F, conflicts Rosa’s F-F receipt claim. - Rosa: Chancellor R5; claims Greta passed F-F and discarded F; directly conflicts Greta. - Ines: Chancellor R2 + President R4, both F; repeat-government suspect; R4 transfer/discard unresolved. - R4 narrowed Ines/Greta/unlucky draw; R5 narrowed Greta/Rosa/unlucky draw. - 3 F enacted; Hitler-election threshold active; special election power unlocked. Open questions: - Otto owes confirmation of lone Nein and investigation result; investigation cannot resolve R4. - Greta owes exact R4 report and reconciliation of R5 mixed-hand claim with Rosa. - Rosa owes exact R5 cards received/discarded. - Ines owes exact R2/R4 transfers/discards and promised investigation result. - Lena R2 report; Boris R1 report; Rosa R3 report unverified. Already said: - Ines leading suspect from repeat F participation; challenged investigation target, favored Lena. - Demanded exact R2/R4/R5 reports and mixed-vs-2F distinction. - Asked Ines withdraw Greta absent report; asked Otto about lone Nein; warned investigation cannot resolve R4. - Supported Rosa/Boris lower-risk test; requested precommitments; voted Ja Greta/Rosa. - Greta primary suspect; oppose future Greta governments until R5 resolved. - Greta/Rosa jointly implicated by conflicting R5 accounts; coherence does not exonerate Greta. - Exclude Greta and Rosa from next government while R5 contradiction stands. - Lena now claims Ja on Greta-Rosa; Otto must verify before her claim carries weight. - Current priority: reject Greta-Rosa government; demand special-election choice of a trusted president.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: Chancellor R4 + President R5, both F; only consecutive-F government player; R5 F-L report conflicts Rosa firsthand F-F claim. - Rosa: Chancellor R5; claims Greta passed F-F; direct conflict with Greta. - Ines: Chancellor R2 + President R4, both F; R4 transfer/discard unresolved; investigation result on Otto never reported. - R4 narrowed Ines/Greta/unlucky draw; R5 narrowed Greta/Rosa/unlucky draw. - 3 F enacted; Hitler threshold active; special election unlocked. Open questions/owed: - Greta: reconcile exact R4 report and R5 mixed-hand claim; name special-election President and intended Chancellor. - Rosa: exact R5 received/discarded cards. - Ines: exact R2/R4 transfers/discards; Otto investigation result. - Lena: exact R2 report; Boris R1 and Rosa R3 reports unverified. - Otto: investigation result unavailable; lone Nein confirmed as his. Already said: - Ines leading repeat-F suspect; challenged investigation target; demanded exact R2/R4/R5 reports and mixed-vs-2F distinctions. - Asked Ines withdraw Greta absent report; asked Otto about lone Nein; warned investigation cannot resolve R4. - Supported lower-risk Rosa/Boris test; requested precommitments; voted Ja Greta/Rosa. - Greta primary suspect; oppose future Greta governments until R5 resolved. - Greta/Rosa jointly implicated by conflicting R5 accounts; exclude both next government. - Current proposal: Greta should special-elect Boris; Boris should nominate me, excluding disputed R4/R5 principals.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: Chancellor R4 + President R5, both F; only consecutive-F government player; R5 F-L report conflicts Rosa firsthand F-F claim. - Rosa: Chancellor R5; claims Greta passed F-F; direct conflict with Greta. - Ines: Chancellor R2 + President R4, both F; R4 transfer/discard unresolved; investigation result on Otto never reported. - R4 narrowed Ines/Greta/unlucky draw; R5 narrowed Greta/Rosa/unlucky draw. - 3 F enacted; Hitler threshold active; special election unlocked. Open questions/owed: - Greta: reconcile exact R4 report and R5 mixed-hand claim; name special-election President and intended Chancellor. - Rosa: exact R5 received/discarded cards. - Ines: exact R2/R4 transfers/discards; Otto investigation result. - Lena: exact R2 report; Boris R1 and Rosa R3 reports unverified. - Otto: investigation result unavailable; lone Nein confirmed as his. Already said: - Ines leading repeat-F suspect; challenged investigation target; demanded exact R2/R4/R5 reports and mixed-vs-2F distinctions. - Asked Ines withdraw Greta absent report; asked Otto about lone Nein; warned investigation cannot resolve R4. - Supported lower-risk Rosa/Boris test; requested precommitments; voted Ja Greta/Rosa. - Greta primary suspect; oppose future Greta governments until R5 resolved. - Greta/Rosa jointly implicated by conflicting R5 accounts; exclude both next government. - Current proposal: Greta should special-elect Boris; Boris should nominate me, excluding disputed R4/R5 principals.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: Chancellor R4 + President R5, both F; only consecutive-F government player; R5 F-L report conflicts Rosa firsthand F-F claim. - Rosa: Chancellor R5; claims Greta passed F-F; direct conflict with Greta. - Ines: Chancellor R2 + President R4, both F; R4 transfer/discard unresolved; investigation result on Otto never reported. - R4 narrowed Ines/Greta/unlucky draw; R5 narrowed Greta/Rosa/unlucky draw. - 3 F enacted; Hitler threshold active; special election unlocked. Open questions/owed: - Greta: reconcile exact R4 report and R5 mixed-hand claim; name special-election President and intended Chancellor. - Rosa: exact R5 received/discarded cards. - Ines: exact R2/R4 transfers/discards; Otto investigation result. - Lena: exact R2 report; Boris R1 and Rosa R3 reports unverified. - Otto: investigation result unavailable; lone Nein confirmed as his. Already said: - Ines leading repeat-F suspect; challenged investigation target; demanded exact R2/R4/R5 reports and mixed-vs-2F distinctions. - Asked Ines withdraw Greta absent report; asked Otto about lone Nein; warned investigation cannot resolve R4. - Supported lower-risk Rosa/Boris test; requested precommitments; voted Ja Greta/Rosa. - Greta primary suspect; oppose future Greta governments until R5 resolved. - Greta/Rosa jointly implicated by conflicting R5 accounts; exclude both next government. - Current proposal: Greta should special-elect Boris; Boris should nominate me, excluding disputed R4/R5 principals. - New: committed to Lena to report exact three-card draw/discard/transfer and enact Liberal from any mixed hand.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: Chancellor R4 + President R5, both F; only consecutive-F government player; R5 F-L report conflicts Rosa's F-F claim. - Rosa: Chancellor R5; claims Greta passed F-F; direct conflict with Greta. - Ines: Chancellor R2 + President R4, both F; R4 transfer/discard unresolved; investigation result on Otto never reported. - R4 narrowed Ines/Greta/unlucky draw; R5 narrowed Greta/Rosa/unlucky draw. - 3 F enacted; Hitler threshold active; special election unlocked. Open questions/owed: - Greta: reconcile exact R4 report and R5 mixed-hand claim; confirm Boris special-election President and my nomination. - Rosa: exact R5 received/discarded cards. - Ines: exact R2/R4 transfers/discards; Otto investigation result. - Lena: exact R2 report; Boris R1 and Rosa R3 reports unverified. - Otto: investigation result unavailable; lone Nein confirmed as his. Already said: - Ines leading repeat-F suspect; challenged investigation target; demanded exact R2/R4/R5 reports and mixed-vs-2F distinctions. - Asked Ines withdraw Greta absent report; asked Otto about lone Nein; warned investigation cannot resolve R4. - Supported lower-risk Rosa/Boris test; requested precommitments; voted Ja Greta/Rosa. - Greta primary suspect; oppose future Greta governments until R5 resolved. - Greta/Rosa jointly implicated by conflicting R5 accounts; exclude both next government. - Proposed Greta special-elect Boris; Boris nominate me, excluding disputed R4/R5 principals. - Committed to Lena: report exact three-card draw/discard/transfer and enact Liberal from any mixed hand. - Now reiterate commitment directly: any mixed hand means Liberal enactment, with exact draw, discard, and passed-card report.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: Chancellor R4 + President R5, both F; only consecutive-F government player; R5 F-L report conflicts Rosa's F-F claim. - Rosa: Chancellor R5; claims Greta passed F-F; direct conflict with Greta. - Ines: Chancellor R2 + President R4, both F; R4 transfer/discard unresolved; investigation result on Otto never reported. - R4 narrowed Ines/Greta/unlucky draw; R5 narrowed Greta/Rosa/unlucky draw. - 3 F enacted; Hitler threshold active; special election unlocked. Open questions/owed: - Greta: reconcile exact R4 report and R5 mixed-hand claim; confirm Boris special-election President and my nomination. - Rosa: exact R5 received/discarded cards. - Ines: exact R2/R4 transfers/discards; Otto investigation result. - Lena: exact R2 report; Boris R1 and Rosa R3 reports unverified. - Otto: investigation result unavailable; lone Nein confirmed as his. Already said: - Ines leading repeat-F suspect; challenged investigation target; demanded exact R2/R4/R5 reports and mixed-vs-2F distinctions. - Asked Ines withdraw Greta absent report; asked Otto about lone Nein; warned investigation cannot resolve R4. - Supported lower-risk Rosa/Boris test; requested precommitments; voted Ja Greta/Rosa. - Greta primary suspect; oppose future Greta governments until R5 resolved. - Greta/Rosa jointly implicated by conflicting R5 accounts; exclude both next government. - Proposed Greta special-elect Boris; Boris nominate me, excluding disputed R4/R5 principals. - Committed to Lena: report exact three-card draw/discard/transfer and enact Liberal from any mixed hand. - Reiterated commitment directly: any mixed hand means Liberal enactment, with exact draw, discard, and passed-card report.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: Chancellor R4 + President R5, both F; only consecutive-F government player; R5 F-L report conflicts Rosa's F-F claim. - Rosa: Chancellor R5; claims Greta passed F-F; direct conflict with Greta. - Ines: Chancellor R2 + President R4, both F; R4 transfer/discard unresolved; investigation result on Otto never reported. - R4 narrowed Ines/Greta/unlucky draw; R5 narrowed Greta/Rosa/unlucky draw. - 3 F enacted; Hitler threshold active; special election unlocked. Open questions/owed: - Boris: exact draw/discard/transfer commitment before nominating me. - Greta: reconcile exact R4 report and R5 mixed-hand claim; confirm Boris special-election President and my nomination. - Rosa: exact R5 received/discarded cards. - Ines: exact R2/R4 transfers/discards; Otto investigation result. - Lena: exact R2 report; Boris R1 and Rosa R3 reports unverified. - Otto: investigation result unavailable; lone Nein confirmed as his. Already said: - Ines leading repeat-F suspect; challenged investigation target; demanded exact R2/R4/R5 reports and mixed-vs-2F distinctions. - Asked Ines withdraw Greta absent report; asked Otto about lone Nein; warned investigation cannot resolve R4. - Supported lower-risk Rosa/Boris test; requested precommitments; voted Ja Greta/Rosa. - Greta primary suspect; oppose future Greta governments until R5 resolved. - Greta/Rosa jointly implicated by conflicting R5 accounts; exclude both next government. - Proposed Greta special-elect Boris; Boris nominate me, excluding disputed R4/R5 principals. - Committed to report exact three-card draw/discard/transfer and enact Liberal from any mixed hand; reaffirmed directly.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: Chancellor R4 + President R5, both F; only consecutive-F government player; R5 F-L report conflicts Rosa’s F-F claim. - Rosa: Chancellor R5; claims Greta passed F-F; direct conflict with Greta. - Ines: Chancellor R2 + President R4, both F; R4 transfer/discard unresolved; investigation result on Otto never reported. - R4 narrowed Ines/Greta/unlucky draw; R5 narrowed Greta/Rosa/unlucky draw. - 3 F enacted; Hitler threshold active; special election unlocked. Open questions/owed: - Boris: exact draw/discard/transfer commitment before nominating me. - Greta: reconcile exact R4 report and R5 mixed-hand claim; confirm Boris special-election President and my nomination. - Rosa: exact R5 received/discarded cards. - Ines: exact R2/R4 transfers/discards; Otto investigation result. - Lena: exact R2 report; Boris R1 and Rosa R3 reports unverified. - Otto: investigation result unavailable; lone Nein confirmed as his. Already said: - Ines leading repeat-F suspect; challenged investigation target; demanded exact R2/R4/R5 reports and mixed-vs-2F distinctions. - Asked Ines withdraw Greta absent report; asked Otto about lone Nein; warned investigation cannot resolve R4. - Supported lower-risk Rosa/Boris test; requested precommitments; voted Ja Greta/Rosa. - Greta primary suspect; oppose future Greta governments until R5 resolved. - Greta/Rosa jointly implicated by conflicting R5 accounts; exclude both next government. - Proposed Greta special-elect Boris; Boris nominate me, excluding disputed R4/R5 principals. - Committed to report exact three-card draw/discard/transfer and enact Liberal from any mixed hand; reaffirmed directly.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President, both F; only consecutive-F government player; R5 F-L report conflicts Rosa F-F claim. - Rosa: R5 Chancellor; claims Greta passed F-F; direct conflict with Greta. - Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President, both F; R4 transfer unresolved; delayed Otto investigation result. - R4 narrowed Ines/Greta/draw; R5 narrowed Greta/Rosa/draw. - 3F enacted; Hitler threshold active; special election used: Boris President. Open questions/owed: - Boris: exact draw/discard/transfer commitment before nominating me; commit discard F from mixed draw. - Greta: reconcile R4/R5 reports; R5 accountability. - Rosa: exact R5 received/discarded cards. - Ines: R2/R4 transfers/discards. - Lena: exact R2 report; Boris R1/Rosa R3 unverified. - Otto: investigation result unavailable; lone Nein confirmed. Already said: - Greta leading suspect; oppose future Greta governments pending R5. - Ines repeat-F suspect; challenged R4/R2 reports and missing investigation context. - Greta/Rosa contradiction; exclude both next government. - Supported special-election Boris -> Nadia test; requested precommitments. - Committed to exact draw/discard/transfer report and Liberal from any mixed hand.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President, both F; consecutive-F governments. R5 F-L report conflicts Rosa F-F claim. - Rosa: R5 Chancellor; direct conflict with Greta; both excluded next government pending reconciliation. - Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President, both F; R4 narrowed Ines/Greta/draw; R2/R4 transfers unresolved; delayed Otto investigation result. - R4 F: Ines/Greta/draw. R5 F: Greta/Rosa/draw. - 3F enacted; Hitler threshold active; Boris made President by special election. Open questions/owed: - Boris: pre-nomination exact draw/discard/transfer commitment; discard F from mixed draw and pass Nadia Liberal. - Greta: reconcile R4/R5 reports; R5 accountability. - Rosa: exact R5 received/discarded cards. - Ines: R2/R4 transfers and discards. - Lena: exact R2 report; Boris R1/Rosa R3 unverified. - Otto: investigation result unavailable; lone Nein confirmed. Already said: - Greta leading suspect; oppose future Greta governments pending R5. - Ines repeat-F suspect; challenged R4/R2 reports and missing investigation context. - Greta/Rosa contradiction; exclude both next government. - Supported special-election Boris -> Nadia test; requested precommitments. - Committed exact draw/discard/transfer report and Liberal from any mixed hand.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President, both F; R5 F report conflicts Rosa's R5 account. - Rosa: R5 Chancellor; direct conflict with Greta; both excluded from next government pending reconciliation. - Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President, both F; R4 narrowed Ines/Greta/draw; R2/R4 transfers unresolved; delayed Otto investigation result. - R4 F: Ines/Greta/draw. R5 F: Greta/Rosa/draw. - 3F enacted; Hitler threshold active; Boris made President by special election. Open questions/owed: - Boris: pre-nomination exact draw/discard/transfer commitment; discard F from mixed draw and pass Nadia Liberal. - Greta: reconcile R4/R5 reports; R5 accountability. - Rosa: exact R5 received/discarded cards. - Ines: R2/R4 transfers and discards. - Lena: exact R2 report; Boris R1/Rosa R3 unverified. - Otto: investigation result unavailable; lone Nein confirmed. Already said: - Greta leading suspect; oppose future Greta governments pending R5. - Ines repeat-F suspect; challenged R4/R2 reports and missing investigation context. - Greta/Rosa contradiction; exclude both next government. - Supported special-election Boris -> Nadia test; requested precommitments. - Committed exact draw/discard/transfer report and Liberal from any mixed hand.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President, both F; R5 F report conflicts Rosa's firsthand R5 F-F claim. - Rosa: R5 Chancellor; direct conflict with Greta; exclude both pending reconciliation. - Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President, both F; delayed Otto investigation result; R2/R4 transfers unresolved. - R4 F: Ines/Greta/draw. R5 F: Greta/Rosa/draw. - 3F enacted; Hitler threshold active; Boris special-election President. Open questions/owed: - Boris: exact R6 draw/discard/transfer commitment; discard F from mixed draw and pass Nadia Liberal (asked, unanswered). - Greta: reconcile R4/R5 reports; R5 accountability. - Rosa: exact R5 received/discarded cards. - Ines: R2/R4 transfers and discards. - Lena: exact R2 report; Boris R1/Rosa R3 unverified. - Otto: investigation result unavailable; lone Nein confirmed. Already said: - Greta leading suspect; oppose future Greta governments pending R5. - Ines repeat-F suspect; challenged R4/R2 reports and missing investigation context. - Greta/Rosa contradiction; exclude both next government. - Supported special-election Boris -> Nadia test; requested precommitments. - Committed exact draw/discard/transfer report and Liberal from any mixed hand. - R6: reminded Boris his exact-report/mixed-hand discard commitment remains unanswered.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President, both F; R5 F report conflicts Rosa's firsthand R5 F-F claim. - Rosa: R5 Chancellor; direct conflict with Greta; exclude both pending reconciliation. - Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President, both F; delayed Otto investigation result; R2/R4 transfers unresolved. - R4 F: Ines/Greta/draw. R5 F: Greta/Rosa/draw. - 3F enacted; Hitler threshold active; Boris special-election President. Open questions/owed: - Boris: exact R6 draw/discard/transfer; discard F from mixed draw and pass Nadia Liberal (commitment made, action/report pending). - Greta: reconcile R4/R5 reports; R5 accountability. - Rosa: exact R5 received/discarded cards. - Ines: R2/R4 transfers and discards. - Lena: exact R2 report; Boris R1/Rosa R3 unverified. - Otto: investigation result unavailable; lone Nein confirmed. Already said: - Greta leading suspect; oppose future Greta governments pending R5. - Ines repeat-F suspect; challenged R4/R2 reports and missing investigation context. - Greta/Rosa contradiction; exclude both next government. - Supported special-election Boris -> Nadia test; requested precommitments. - Committed exact draw/discard/transfer report and Liberal from any mixed hand. - R6 reminded Boris exact-report/mixed-hand discard commitment remains unanswered. - Rosa says vote Ja; exact reports required if F enacted.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President, both F; R5 report conflicts Rosa firsthand F-F claim. - Rosa: R5 Chancellor; direct conflict with Greta; exclude both pending reconciliation. - Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President, both F; delayed Otto investigation result; R2/R4 transfers unresolved. - R4 F: Ines/Greta/draw. R5 F: Greta/Rosa/draw. - 3F enacted; Hitler threshold active; Boris special-election President. Open questions/owed: - Boris: R6 exact draw/discard/transfer; promised discard F from mixed and pass Nadia Liberal. - Greta: reconcile R4/R5 reports; R5 accountability. - Rosa: exact R5 received/discarded cards. - Ines: R2/R4 transfers/discards. - Lena: exact R2 report; Boris R1/Rosa R3 unverified. - Otto: investigation result context; lone Nein confirmed. Already said: - Greta leading suspect; oppose future Greta governments pending R5. - Ines repeat-F suspect; challenged R4/R2 reports and missing investigation context. - Greta/Rosa contradiction; exclude both next government. - Supported special-election Boris-Nadia test; requested precommitments. - Committed exact R6 draw/discard/transfer report and Liberal from any mixed hand. - R6 reminded Boris exact-report/mixed-hand discard commitment; vote Ja.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President, both F; R5 report conflicts Rosa firsthand F-F claim. - Rosa: R5 Chancellor; direct conflict with Greta; exclude both pending reconciliation. - Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President, both F; delayed Otto investigation; R2/R4 transfers unresolved. - R4 F: Ines/Greta/draw. R5 F: Greta/Rosa/draw. - 3F enacted; Hitler threshold active; Boris special-election President. - R6 Liberal enacted by Boris-Nadia government; Boris still owes exact report. Open questions/owed: - Boris: exact R6 draw/discard/transfer; promised discard F from mixed and pass Liberal. - Greta: reconcile R4/R5 reports; R5 accountability. - Rosa: exact R5 received/discarded cards. - Ines: R2/R4 transfers/discards; investigation context was delayed. - Lena: exact R2 report; Boris R1/Rosa R3 unverified. - Otto: investigation result context; lone Nein confirmed. Already said: - Greta leading suspect; oppose future Greta governments pending R5. - Ines repeat-F suspect; challenged R4/R2 reports and missing investigation context. - Greta/Rosa contradiction; exclude both next government. - Supported special-election Boris-Nadia test; requested precommitments. - Committed exact R6 draw/discard/transfer report and Liberal from any mixed hand. - R6 reminded Boris exact-report/mixed-hand discard commitment; voted Ja. - Enacted R6 Liberal; demanded Boris's exact report.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President, both F; R5 report conflicts Rosa firsthand F-F claim. - Rosa: R5 Chancellor; direct conflict with Greta; exclude both pending reconciliation. - Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President, both F; delayed Otto investigation; R2/R4 transfers unresolved. - R4 F: Ines/Greta/draw. R5 F: Greta/Rosa/draw. - 3F enacted; Hitler threshold active; Boris special-election President. - R6 Liberal by Boris-Nadia; narrows R6 blame but Boris still owes exact report. Open questions/owed: - Boris: exact R6 draw/discard/transfer; promised discard F from mixed and pass Liberal. - Greta: reconcile R4/R5 reports; R5 accountability. - Rosa: exact R5 received/discarded cards. - Ines: R2/R4 transfers/discards; investigation context delayed. - Lena: exact R2 report; Boris R1/Rosa R3 unverified. - Otto: investigation result context; lone Nein confirmed. Already said: - Greta leading suspect; oppose future Greta governments pending R5. - Ines repeat-F suspect; challenged R4/R2 reports and missing investigation context. - Greta/Rosa contradiction; exclude both next government. - Supported special-election Boris-Nadia test; requested precommitments. - Committed exact R6 draw/discard/transfer report and Liberal from any mixed hand. - R6 reminded Boris exact-report/mixed-hand discard commitment; voted Ja. - Enacted R6 Liberal; demanded Boris's exact report.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President, both F; R5 report conflicts Rosa's F-F claim. - Rosa: R5 Chancellor; direct conflict with Greta; exclude both pending reconciliation. - Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President, both F; delayed Otto investigation; R2/R4 transfers unresolved. - R4 F: Ines/Greta/draw. R5 F: Greta/Rosa/draw. - 3F enacted; Hitler threshold active; Boris special-election President. - R6 Liberal by Boris-Nadia; R6 blame narrowed but Boris's exact report still relevant. Open questions/owed: - Boris: exact R6 draw/discard/transfer; claims L-L-F, discarded F, passed L-L. - Greta: reconcile R4/R5 reports; R5 accountability. - Rosa: exact R5 received/discarded cards. - Ines: R2/R4 transfers/discards; investigation context delayed. - Lena: exact R2 report; Boris R1/Rosa R3 unverified. - Otto: investigation result context; lone Nein confirmed. Already said: - Greta leading suspect; oppose future Greta governments pending R5. - Ines repeat-F suspect; challenged R4/R2 reports and missing investigation context. - Greta/Rosa contradiction; exclude both next government. - Supported special-election Boris-Nadia test; requested precommitments. - Committed exact R6 draw/discard/transfer report and Liberal from any mixed hand. - R6 reminded Boris exact-report/mixed-hand discard commitment; voted Ja. - Enacted R6 Liberal; demanded Boris's exact report. - Now report: received L-L, discarded one Liberal, enacted the other Liberal.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President, both F; R5 report conflicts Rosa’s firsthand F-F claim. - Rosa: R5 Chancellor; direct conflict with Greta. - Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President, both F; delayed Otto investigation; R2/R4 transfers unresolved. - R4 F: Ines/Greta/draw. R5 F: Greta/Rosa/draw. - 3F enacted; Hitler threshold active. - R6 Liberal Boris–Nadia; Boris claims L-L-F, discarded F, passed L-L; consistent with Liberal outcome but exact report still relevant. Open questions/owed: - Greta: reconcile R4/R5 reports; R5 accountability. - Rosa: exact R5 received/discarded cards. - Ines: R2/R4 transfers/discards; investigation context. - Lena: exact R2 report; Boris R1/Rosa R3 unverified. - Otto: investigation context; lone Nein confirmed. Already said: - Greta leading suspect; oppose future Greta governments pending R5. - Ines repeat-F suspect; challenged R4/R2 reports and missing investigation context. - Greta/Rosa contradiction; exclude both next government. - Supported special-election Boris–Nadia test; requested precommitments. - Committed exact R6 report and Liberal from any mixed hand. - R6 requested Boris exact report/mixed-hand discard commitment; voted Ja. - R6 Liberal enacted; reported discarded one Liberal and enacted the other; identities indistinguishable.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President, both F; R5 report conflicts Rosa firsthand F-F. - Rosa: R5 Chancellor; direct conflict with Greta. - Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President, both F; delayed Otto investigation; R2/R4 transfers unresolved. - R4 F: Ines/Greta/draw. R5 F: Greta/Rosa/draw. - 3F enacted; Hitler threshold active. - R6 Liberal Boris–Nadia; Boris L-L-F report consistent; Nadia discarded L, enacted L. Open questions/owed: - Greta: reconcile R4/R5 reports; R5 accountability. - Rosa: exact R5 received/discarded cards. - Ines: R2/R4 transfers/discards; investigation context. - Lena: exact R2 report; Boris R1/Rosa R3 unverified. - Otto: investigation context; lone Nein confirmed. Already said: - Greta leading suspect; oppose future Greta governments pending R5. - Ines repeat-F suspect; challenged R4/R2 reports and missing investigation context. - Greta/Rosa contradiction; exclude both next government. - Supported special-election Boris–Nadia test; requested precommitments. - Committed exact R6 report and Liberal from any mixed hand. - Requested Boris R6 exact report/mixed-hand discard commitment; voted Ja. - R6 reported discarded one Liberal and enacted the other; identities indistinguishable.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President, both F; R5 report conflicts Rosa firsthand F-F. - Rosa: R5 Chancellor; direct conflict with Greta. - Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President, both F; delayed Otto investigation; R2/R4 transfers unresolved. - R4 F: Ines/Greta/draw. R5 F: Greta/Rosa/draw. - 3F enacted; Hitler threshold active. - R6 Liberal Boris–Nadia; Boris L-L-F report consistent; Nadia discarded L, enacted L. Open questions/owed: - Greta: reconcile R4/R5 reports; R5 accountability. - Rosa: exact R5 received/discarded cards. - Ines: R2/R4 transfers/discards; investigation context. - Lena: exact R2 report; Boris R1/Rosa R3 unverified. - Otto: investigation context; lone Nein confirmed. Already said: - Greta leading suspect; oppose future Greta governments pending R5. - Ines repeat-F suspect; challenged R4/R2 reports and missing investigation context. - Greta/Rosa contradiction; exclude both next government. - Supported special-election Boris–Nadia test; requested precommitments. - Committed exact R6 report and Liberal from any mixed hand. - Requested Boris R6 exact report/mixed-hand discard commitment; voted Ja. - R6 reported discarded one Liberal and enacted the other; identities indistinguishable.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President, both F; R5 account conflicts Rosa; highest concern. - Rosa: R5 Chancellor; conflicts Greta over R5 cards. - Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President, both F; R2/R4 transfers unresolved; delayed Otto investigation. - R4 F: Ines/Greta/draw. R5 F: Greta/Rosa/draw. - 3F enacted; Hitler-election threshold active. - R6 Boris–Nadia L; Boris reported L-L-F, Nadia discarded L and enacted L. Open questions/owed: - Greta: reconcile R4/R5 reports; R5 accountability. - Rosa: exact R5 received/discarded cards. - Ines: R2/R4 transfers and discards; investigation context. - Lena: exact R2 report; Boris R1/Rosa R3 unverified. - Otto: investigation context; lone Nein confirmed. Already said: - Greta leading suspect; oppose future Greta governments pending R5 explanation. - Ines repeat-F suspect; challenged R2/R4 reports and missing investigation context. - Greta/Rosa contradiction; exclude both next government. - Supported Boris–Nadia special-election test; requested precommitments. - Committed exact R6 report and Liberal from any mixed hand. - Requested Boris R6 exact report/mixed-hand discard commitment; voted Ja. - R6 reported discarded one Liberal and enacted the other; identities indistinguishable.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President, both F; R5 account conflicts Rosa; highest concern. - Rosa: R5 Chancellor; conflicts Greta over R5 cards. - Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President, both F; R2/R4 transfers unresolved; delayed Otto investigation. - R4 F: Ines/Greta/draw. R5 F: Greta/Rosa/draw. - 3F enacted; Hitler-election threshold active. - R6 Boris–Nadia L; Boris reported L-L-F, Nadia discarded L and enacted L. - Otto: no government tied to enacted policy; precommitment requested before nomination. Open questions/owed: - Greta: reconcile R4/R5 reports; R5 accountability. - Rosa: exact R5 received/discarded cards. - Ines: R2/R4 transfers and discards; investigation context. - Lena: exact R2 report; Boris R1/Rosa R3 unverified. - Otto: investigation context; lone Nein confirmed; exact precommitment/report owed. Already said: - Greta leading suspect; oppose future Greta governments pending R5 explanation. - Ines repeat-F suspect; challenged R2/R4 reports and missing investigation context. - Greta/Rosa contradiction; exclude both next government. - Supported Boris–Nadia special-election test; requested precommitments. - Committed exact R6 report and Liberal from any mixed hand. - Requested Boris R6 exact report/mixed-hand discard commitment; voted Ja. - R6 reported discarded one Liberal and enacted the other; identities indistinguishable.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President, both F; R5 account conflicts Rosa; highest concern. - Rosa: R5 Chancellor; conflicts Greta over R5 cards. - Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President, both F; R2/R4 transfers unresolved; delayed Otto investigation. - R4 F: Ines/Greta/draw. R5 F: Greta/Rosa/draw. - 3F enacted; Hitler-election threshold active. - R6 Boris–Nadia L; Boris reported L-L-F, Nadia discarded L and enacted L. - Otto: no government tied to enacted policy; precommitment requested before nomination. Open questions/owed: - Greta: reconcile R4/R5 reports; R5 accountability. - Rosa: exact R5 received/discarded cards. - Ines: R2/R4 transfers and discards; investigation context. - Lena: exact R2 report; Boris R1/Rosa R3 unverified. - Otto: investigation context; lone Nein confirmed; exact precommitment/report owed. Already said: - Greta leading suspect; oppose future Greta governments pending R5 explanation. - Ines repeat-F suspect; challenged R2/R4 reports and missing investigation context. - Greta/Rosa contradiction; exclude both next government. - Supported Boris–Nadia special-election test; requested precommitments. - Committed exact R6 report and Liberal from any mixed hand. - Requested Boris R6 exact report/mixed-hand discard commitment; voted Ja. - R6 reported discarded one Liberal and enacted the other; identities indistinguishable. - Told table I am leaning toward Otto and asked him to commit to exact draw/discard/transfer and passing Liberal from mixed hand. - Now explicitly identify Otto as intended nominee, pending his answer.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President, both F; R5 account conflicts Rosa; highest concern. - Rosa: R5 Chancellor; conflicts Greta over R5 cards. - Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President, both F; R2/R4 transfers unresolved; delayed Otto investigation. - R4 F: Ines/Greta/draw. R5 F: Greta/Rosa/draw. - 3F enacted; Hitler-election threshold active. - R6 Boris–Nadia L; Boris reported L-L-F, Nadia discarded L and enacted L. - Otto: no enacted-policy government; lone Nein; now committed exact report and Liberal from mixed hand. Open questions/owed: - Greta: reconcile R4/R5 reports; R5 accountability. - Rosa: exact R5 received/discarded cards. - Ines: R2/R4 transfers and discards; investigation context. - Lena: exact R2 report; Boris R1/Rosa R3 unverified. - Otto: investigation context; commitment now answered. Already said: - Greta leading suspect; oppose future Greta governments pending R5 explanation. - Ines repeat-F suspect; challenged R2/R4 reports and missing investigation context. - Greta/Rosa contradiction; exclude both next government. - Supported Boris–Nadia special-election test; requested precommitments. - Committed exact R6 report and Liberal from any mixed hand. - Requested Boris R6 exact report/mixed-hand discard commitment; voted Ja. - R6 reported discarded one Liberal and enacted the other; identities indistinguishable. - Told table leaning Otto and asked exact draw/discard/transfer and Liberal mixed-hand commitment. - Otto answered; intended nominee.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President, both F; R5 account conflicts Rosa; highest concern. - Rosa: R5 Chancellor; conflicts Greta over R5 cards. - Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President, both F; R2/R4 transfers unresolved; delayed Otto investigation. - R4 F: Ines/Greta/draw. R5 F: Greta/Rosa/draw. - 3F enacted; Hitler-election threshold active. - R6 Boris–Nadia L; Boris reported L-L-F, Nadia discarded L and enacted L. - Otto: no enacted-policy government; lone Nein; committed exact report and Liberal from mixed hand. Open questions/owed: - Greta: reconcile R4/R5 reports; R5 accountability. - Rosa: exact R5 received/discarded cards. - Ines: R2/R4 transfers and discards; investigation context. - Lena: exact R2 report; Boris R1/Rosa R3 unverified. - Otto: investigation context; commitment answered. Already said: - Greta leading suspect; oppose future Greta governments pending R5 explanation. - Ines repeat-F suspect; challenged R2/R4 reports and missing investigation context. - Greta/Rosa contradiction; exclude both next government. - Supported Boris–Nadia special-election test; requested precommitments. - Committed exact R6 report and Liberal from any mixed hand. - Requested Boris R6 exact report/mixed-hand discard commitment; voted Ja. - R6 reported discarded one Liberal and enacted the other; identities indistinguishable. - Told table leaning Otto and asked exact draw/discard/transfer and Liberal mixed-hand commitment. - Otto answered; intended nominee.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President, both F; R5 account conflicts Rosa; highest concern. - Rosa: R5 Chancellor; conflicts Greta over R5 cards. - Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President, both F; R2/R4 transfers unresolved; delayed Otto investigation. - R4 F: Ines/Greta/draw. R5 F: Greta/Rosa/draw. - 3F enacted; Hitler-election threshold active. - R6 Boris–Nadia L; Boris reported L-L-F, Nadia discarded L and enacted L. - Otto: no enacted-policy government; lone Nein; committed exact report and Liberal from mixed hand. Open questions/owed: - Greta: reconcile R4/R5 reports; R5 accountability. - Rosa: exact R5 received/discarded cards. - Ines: R2/R4 transfers and discards; investigation context. - Lena: exact R2 draw/discard/transfer; asked now. - Boris R1/Rosa R3 unverified. - Otto: investigation context; commitment answered. Already said: - Greta leading suspect; oppose future Greta governments pending R5 explanation. - Ines repeat-F suspect; challenged R2/R4 reports and missing investigation context. - Greta/Rosa contradiction; exclude both next government. - Supported Boris–Nadia special-election test; requested precommitments. - Committed exact R6 report and Liberal from any mixed hand. - Requested Boris R6 exact report/mixed-hand discard commitment; voted Ja. - R6 reported discarded one Liberal and enacted the other; identities indistinguishable. - Told table leaning Otto and asked exact draw/discard/transfer and Liberal mixed-hand commitment. - Otto answered; intended nominee.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President, both F; R5 account conflicts Rosa; highest concern. - Rosa: R5 Chancellor; conflicts Greta over R5 cards. - Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President, both F; R2/R4 transfers unresolved; delayed Otto investigation. - R4 F: Ines/Greta/draw. R5 F: Greta/Rosa/draw. - 3F enacted; Hitler-election threshold active. - R6 Boris–Nadia L; Boris reported L-L-F, Nadia discarded L and enacted L. - Otto: no enacted-policy government; lone Nein; committed exact report and Liberal from mixed hand. Open questions/owed: - Greta: reconcile R4/R5 reports; R5 accountability. - Rosa: exact R5 received/discarded cards. - Ines: R2/R4 transfers and discards; investigation context. - Lena: exact R2 draw/discard/transfer; still unanswered; rules her out today if silent. - Boris R1/Rosa R3 unverified. - Otto: investigation context; commitment answered. Already said: - Greta leading suspect; oppose future Greta governments pending R5 explanation. - Ines repeat-F suspect; challenged R2/R4 reports and missing investigation context. - Greta/Rosa contradiction; exclude both next government. - Supported Boris–Nadia special-election test; requested precommitments. - Committed exact R6 report and Liberal from any mixed hand. - Requested Boris R6 exact report/mixed-hand discard commitment; voted Ja. - R6 reported discarded one Liberal and enacted the other; identities indistinguishable. - Told table leaning Otto and asked exact draw/discard/transfer and Liberal mixed-hand commitment. - Otto answered; intended nominee. - Lena’s silence now rules her out for today.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President, both F; R5 account conflicts Rosa; highest concern. - Rosa: R5 Chancellor; conflicts Greta over R5 cards. - Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President, both F; R2/R4 transfers unresolved; delayed Otto investigation. - R4 F: Ines/Greta/draw. R5 F: Greta/Rosa/draw. - 3F enacted; Hitler-election threshold active. - R6 Boris–Nadia L; Boris reported L-L-F, Nadia discarded L and enacted L. - Otto: no enacted-policy government; lone Nein; committed exact report and Liberal from mixed hand. Open questions/owed: - Greta: reconcile R4/R5 reports; R5 accountability. - Rosa: exact R5 received/discarded cards. - Ines: R2/R4 transfers and discards; investigation context. - Lena: exact R2 draw/discard/transfer; unanswered; excluded from today. - Boris R1/Rosa R3 unverified. - Otto: investigation context; commitment answered. Already said: - Greta leading suspect; oppose future Greta governments pending R5 explanation. - Ines repeat-F suspect; challenged R2/R4 reports and missing investigation context. - Greta/Rosa contradiction; exclude both next government. - Supported Boris–Nadia special-election test; requested precommitments. - Committed exact R6 report and Liberal from any mixed hand. - Requested Boris R6 exact report/mixed-hand discard commitment; voted Ja. - R6 reported discarded one Liberal and enacted the other; identities indistinguishable. - Told table leaning Otto and asked exact draw/discard/transfer and Liberal mixed-hand commitment. - Otto answered; intended nominee. - Lena silence rules her out today.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President, both F; R5 account conflicts Rosa; highest concern. - Rosa: R5 Chancellor; conflicts Greta over R5 cards. - Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President, both F; R2/R4 transfers unresolved. - R4 F: Ines/Greta/draw. R5 F: Greta/Rosa/draw. - 3F enacted; Hitler-election threshold active. - R6 Boris–Nadia L; Boris reported L-L-F, Nadia discarded L/enacted L. - Otto: no enacted-policy government; committed exact report and Liberal from mixed hand. Open questions/owed: - Greta: reconcile R4/R5 reports; R5 accountability. - Rosa: exact R5 received/discarded cards. - Ines: R2/R4 transfers, discards, investigation context. - Lena: R2 exact draw/discard/transfer; just claimed F-F-L, discarded F, passed F-L to Ines; late/unverified. - Boris R1/Rosa R3 unverified; Otto investigation context. Already said: - Greta leading suspect; oppose future Greta governments pending R5 explanation. - Ines repeat-F suspect; challenged R2/R4 reports. - Greta/Rosa contradiction; exclude both next government. - Supported Boris–Nadia test; requested precommitments. - R6 exact report; discarded one Liberal/enacted the other. - Leaning Otto; requested and received Otto's exact-report/Liberal mixed-hand commitment. - Lena silence previously ruled her out today; now nominate Otto.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President, both F; R5 account conflicts Rosa; highest concern. - Rosa: R5 Chancellor; conflicts Greta over R5 cards. - Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President, both F; R2/R4 transfers unresolved. - R4 F: Ines/Greta/draw. R5 F: Greta/Rosa/draw. - 3F enacted; Hitler-election threshold active. - R6 Boris–Nadia L; Boris reported L-L-F, Nadia discarded L/enacted L. - Otto: no enacted-policy government; committed exact report and Liberal from mixed hand. Open questions/owed: - Greta: reconcile R4/R5 reports; R5 accountability. - Rosa: exact R5 received/discarded cards. - Ines: R2/R4 transfers, discards, investigation context. - Lena: R2 exact draw/discard/transfer; claimed F-F-L, discarded F, passed F-L to Ines; late/unverified. - Boris R1/Rosa R3 unverified; Otto investigation context. Already said: - Greta leading suspect; oppose future Greta governments pending R5 explanation. - Ines repeat-F suspect; challenged R2/R4 reports. - Greta/Rosa contradiction; exclude both next government. - Supported Boris–Nadia test; requested precommitments. - R6 exact report; discarded one Liberal/enacted the other. - Leaning Otto; requested and received Otto’s exact-report/Liberal mixed-hand commitment. - Lena silence previously ruled her out today; now nominated Otto. - Current debate: President Nadia, Chancellor Otto; justify nomination and seek vote.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President, both F; R5 account conflicts Rosa; highest concern. - Rosa: R5 Chancellor; conflicts Greta over R5 cards. - Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President, both F; R2/R4 transfers unresolved. - R4 F: Ines/Greta/draw. R5 F: Greta/Rosa/draw. - 3F enacted; Hitler-election threshold active. - R6 Boris–Nadia L; Boris reported L-L-F, Nadia discarded L/enacted L. - Otto: no enacted-policy government; committed exact report and Liberal from mixed hand; lone Nein R5 still unexplained. Open questions/owed: - Greta: reconcile R4/R5 reports; R5 accountability. - Rosa: exact R5 received/discarded cards. - Ines: R2/R4 transfers, discards, investigation context. - Lena: R2 exact draw/discard/transfer; claimed F-F-L, discarded F, passed F-L to Ines; late/unverified. - Boris R1/Rosa R3 unverified; Otto investigation context; Otto’s R5 Nein rationale. Already said: - Greta leading suspect; oppose future Greta governments pending R5 explanation. - Ines repeat-F suspect; challenged R2/R4 reports. - Greta/Rosa contradiction; exclude both next government. - Supported Boris–Nadia test; requested precommitments. - R6 exact report; discarded one Liberal/enacted the other. - Leaning Otto; requested and received Otto’s exact-report/Liberal mixed-hand commitment. - Lena silence previously ruled her out today; now nominated Otto. - Current nomination: Nadia–Otto is a test, not blind trust; request Otto precommit report and policy choice.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President, both F; R5 account conflicts Rosa; highest concern. - Rosa: R5 Chancellor; conflicts Greta over R5 cards. - Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President, both F; R2/R4 transfers unresolved. - R4 F: Ines/Greta/draw. R5 F: Greta/Rosa/draw. - 3F enacted; Hitler-election threshold active. - R6 Boris–Nadia L; Boris reported L-L-F, Nadia discarded L/enacted L. - Otto: no enacted-policy government; committed exact report and Liberal from mixed hand; lone Nein R5 explained as suspicion of Greta. Open questions/owed: - Greta: reconcile R4/R5 reports; R5 accountability. - Rosa: exact R5 received/discarded cards. - Ines: R2/R4 transfers, discards, investigation context. - Lena: R2 exact draw/discard/transfer; claimed F-F-L, discarded F, passed F-L to Ines; late/unverified. Already said: - Greta leading suspect; oppose future Greta governments pending R5 explanation. - Ines repeat-F suspect; challenged R2/R4 reports. - Greta/Rosa contradiction; exclude both next government. - Supported Boris–Nadia test; requested precommitments. - R6 exact report; discarded one Liberal/enacted the other. - Lena silence previously ruled her out today. - Nominated Otto; Otto–Nadia government is a test, not blind trust; requested exact report and policy-choice commitment. Current vote: Ja for Nadia–Otto; no concrete evidence against Otto.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President, both F; R5 account conflicts Rosa; highest concern. - Rosa: R5 Chancellor; conflicts Greta over R5 cards. - Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President, both F; R2/R4 transfers unresolved. - R4 F: Ines/Greta/draw. R5 F: Greta/Rosa/draw. - 3F enacted; Hitler-election threshold active. - R6 Boris–Nadia L; Boris reported L-L-F, Nadia discarded L/enacted L. - Otto: no enacted-policy government; lone Nein R5 explained as suspicion of Greta; now elected with Nadia. Open questions/owed: - Greta: reconcile R4/R5 reports; R5 accountability. - Rosa: exact R5 received/discarded cards. - Ines: R2/R4 transfers, discards, investigation context. - Lena: R2 exact draw/discard/transfer; late claim F-F-L, discarded F, passed F-L to Ines; unverified. Already said: - Greta leading suspect; oppose future Greta governments pending R5 explanation. - Ines repeat-F suspect; challenged R2/R4 reports. - Greta/Rosa contradiction; exclude both next government. - Supported Boris–Nadia test; requested precommitments. - R6 exact report; discarded one Liberal/enacted the other. - Lena silence previously ruled her out today. - Nominated Otto; Otto–Nadia government is a test, not blind trust; requested exact report and Liberal commitment.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President, both F; R5 account conflicts Rosa; highest concern. - Rosa: R5 Chancellor; conflicts Greta over R5 cards. - Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President, both F; R2/R4 transfers unresolved. - R4 F: Ines/Greta/draw. R5 F: Greta/Rosa/draw. - 3F enacted; Hitler-election threshold active. - R6 Boris–Nadia L; Boris reported L-L-F, Nadia discarded L/enacted L. - R7 Nadia–Otto L; Otto now has one enacted-policy government, exact cards/account owed. - Otto: lone Nein R5 explained as suspicion of Greta; now elected with Nadia. Open questions/owed: - Otto: exact R7 draw, discard, received card, and precommitment/account. - Greta: reconcile R4/R5 reports; R5 accountability. - Rosa: exact R5 received/discarded cards. - Ines: R2/R4 transfers, discards, investigation context. - Lena: R2 exact draw/discard/transfer; late claim F-F-L, discarded F, passed F-L to Ines; unverified. Already said: - Greta leading suspect; oppose future Greta governments pending R5 explanation. - Ines repeat-F suspect; challenged R2/R4 reports. - Greta/Rosa contradiction; exclude both next government. - Supported Boris–Nadia test; requested precommitments. - R6 exact report; discarded one Liberal/enacted the other. - Lena silence previously ruled her out today. - Nominated Otto; Otto–Nadia government is a test, not blind trust; requested exact report and Liberal commitment.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President, both F; R5 account conflicts Rosa; highest concern. - Rosa: R5 Chancellor; conflicts Greta over R5 cards. - Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President, both F; R2/R4 transfers unresolved. - R4 F: Ines/Greta/draw. R5 F: Greta/Rosa/draw. - 3F enacted; Hitler-election threshold active. - R6 Boris–Nadia L; Boris reported L-L-F, Nadia discarded L/enacted L. - R7 Nadia–Otto L; not cleared until exact account. - Otto: lone Nein R5 explained as suspicion of Greta; now in R7 L government. Open questions/owed: - Otto: exact R7 draw, discard, received card, and account; unanswered. - Greta: reconcile R4/R5 reports; R5 accountability. - Rosa: exact R5 received/discarded cards. - Ines: R2/R4 transfers, discards, investigation context. - Lena: R2 exact draw/discard/transfer; late F-F-L claim unverified. Already said: - Greta leading suspect; oppose future Greta governments pending R5 explanation. - Ines repeat-F suspect; challenged R2/R4 reports. - Greta/Rosa contradiction; exclude both next government. - Supported Boris–Nadia test; requested precommitments. - R6 exact report; discarded one Liberal/enacted the other. - Lena silence previously ruled her out today. - Nominated Otto; Otto–Nadia government is a test, not blind trust; requested exact report and Liberal commitment.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President, both F; R5 account conflicts Rosa; highest concern. - Rosa: R5 Chancellor; conflicts Greta over R5 cards. - Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President, both F; R2/R4 transfers unresolved. - R4 F: Ines/Greta/draw. R5 F: Greta/Rosa/draw. - 3F enacted; Hitler-election threshold active. - R6 Boris–Nadia L; Boris reported L-L-F, Nadia discarded L/enacted L. - R7 Nadia–Otto L; exact account outstanding. - Otto: lone Nein R5 explained as suspicion of Greta; now in R7 L government. Open questions/owed: - Otto: exact R7 draw, discard, received card, account; owes answer now. - Greta: reconcile R4/R5 reports; R5 accountability. - Rosa: exact R5 received/discarded cards. - Ines: R2/R4 transfers, discards, investigation context. - Lena: R2 exact draw/discard/transfer; late F-F-L claim unverified. Already said: - Greta leading suspect; oppose future Greta governments pending R5 explanation. - Ines repeat-F suspect; challenged R2/R4 reports. - Greta/Rosa contradiction; exclude both next government. - Supported Boris–Nadia test; requested precommitments. - R6 exact report; discarded one Liberal/enacted the other. - Lena silence previously ruled her out today. - Nominated Otto; Otto–Nadia test, not blind trust; requested exact report and Liberal commitment.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President, both F; R5 account conflicts Rosa; highest concern. - Rosa: R5 Chancellor; conflicts Greta over R5 cards. - Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President, both F; R2/R4 transfers unresolved. - R4 F: Ines/Greta/draw. R5 F: Greta/Rosa/draw. - 3F enacted; Hitler-election threshold active. - R6 Boris–Nadia L; Boris reported L-L-F, Nadia discarded L/enacted L. - R7 Nadia–Otto L; Otto's exact account still unanswered. - Otto: lone Nein R5 explained as suspicion of Greta; R7 L government does not clear him as Fascist. Open questions/owed: - Otto: exact R7 draw, discard, received card, account; owes answer. - Greta: reconcile R4/R5 reports; R5 accountability. - Rosa: exact R5 received/discarded cards. - Ines: R2/R4 transfers, discards, investigation context. - Lena: R2 exact draw/discard/transfer; late F-F-L claim unverified. Already said: - Greta leading suspect; oppose future Greta governments pending R5 explanation. - Ines repeat-F suspect; challenged R2/R4 reports. - Greta/Rosa contradiction; exclude both next government. - Supported Boris–Nadia test; requested precommitments. - R6 exact report; discarded one Liberal/enacted the other. - Lena silence previously ruled her out today. - Nominated Otto; Otto–Nadia test, not blind trust; requested exact report and Liberal commitment.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President, both F; R5 account conflicts Rosa; highest concern. - Rosa: R5 Chancellor; conflicts Greta over R5 cards. - Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President, both F; R2/R4 transfers unresolved. - R4 F: Ines/Greta/draw. R5 F: Greta/Rosa/draw. - 3F enacted; Hitler-election threshold active. - R6 Boris–Nadia L; Boris reported L-L-F, Nadia discarded L/enacted L. - R7 Nadia–Otto L; Nadia: draw L-L-F, discarded F, passed L-L; Otto enacted L. - Otto: lone Nein R5 explained as suspicion of Greta; R7 L government does not clear him as Fascist. Open questions/owed: - Greta: reconcile R4/R5 reports; R5 accountability. - Rosa: exact R5 received/discarded cards. - Ines: R2/R4 transfers, discards, investigation context. - Lena: R2 exact draw/discard/transfer; late F-F-L claim unverified. Already said: - Greta leading suspect; oppose future Greta governments pending R5 explanation. - Ines repeat-F suspect; challenged R2/R4 reports. - Greta/Rosa contradiction; exclude both next government. - Supported Boris–Nadia test; requested precommitments. - R6 exact report; discarded one Liberal/enacted the other. - Lena silence previously ruled her out today. - Nominated Otto; Otto–Nadia test, not blind trust; requested exact report and Liberal commitment. - Corrected Otto’s mechanically backwards R7 wording with exact presidential account.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President, both F; R5 account conflicts Rosa; highest concern. - Rosa: R5 Chancellor; conflicts Greta over R5 cards. - Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President, both F; R2/R4 transfers unresolved. - R4 F: Ines/Greta/draw. R5 F: Greta/Rosa/draw. - 3F enacted; Hitler-election threshold active. - R6 Boris–Nadia L; Boris L-L-F, discarded F; Nadia discarded L/enacted L. - R7 Nadia–Otto L; Nadia L-L-F, discarded F, passed L-L; Otto enacted L. - Otto lone Nein R5 explained as suspicion of Greta; R7 L does not clear Fascist. Open questions/owed: - Greta: reconcile R4/R5 reports; R5 accountability. - Rosa: exact R5 received/discarded cards. - Ines: R2/R4 transfers, discards, investigation context. - Lena: R2 exact draw/discard/transfer; late F-F-L claim unverified. Already said: - Greta leading suspect; oppose future Greta governments pending R5 explanation. - Ines repeat-F suspect; challenged R2/R4 reports. - Greta/Rosa contradiction; exclude both next government. - Supported Boris–Nadia test; requested precommitments. - R6 exact report; discarded one Liberal/enacted the other. - Lena silence ruled her out today. - Nominated Otto; Otto–Nadia test, requested exact report and Liberal commitment. - Corrected Otto’s mechanically backwards R7 wording with exact presidential account.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President, both F; R5 account conflicts Rosa; highest concern. - Rosa: R5 Chancellor; conflicts Greta over R5 cards. - Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President, both F; R2/R4 transfers unresolved. - R4 F: Ines/Greta/draw. R5 F: Greta/Rosa/draw. - 3F enacted; Hitler-election threshold active. - R6 Boris–Nadia L; Boris L-L-F, discarded F; Nadia discarded L/enacted L. - R7 Nadia–Otto L; Nadia L-L-F, discarded F, passed L-L; Otto enacted L. - Otto lone Nein R5 explained as suspicion of Greta; R7 L does not clear Fascist. Open questions/owed: - Greta: reconcile R4/R5 reports; R5 accountability. - Rosa: exact R5 received/discarded cards. - Ines: R2/R4 transfers, discards, investigation context. - Lena: R2 exact draw/discard/transfer; late F-F-L claim unverified. Already said: - Greta leading suspect; oppose future Greta governments pending R5 explanation. - Ines repeat-F suspect; challenged R2/R4 reports. - Greta/Rosa contradiction; exclude both next government. - Supported Boris–Nadia test; requested precommitments. - R6 exact report; discarded one Liberal/enacted the other. - Lena silence ruled her out today. - Nominated Otto; Otto–Nadia test, requested exact report and Liberal commitment. - Corrected Otto’s mechanically backwards R7 wording with exact presidential account.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President, both F; R5 account conflicts Rosa; highest concern. - Rosa: R5 Chancellor; conflicts Greta over R5 cards. - Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President, both F; R2/R4 transfers unresolved. - R4 F: Ines/Greta/draw. R5 F: Greta/Rosa/draw. - 3F enacted; Hitler-election threshold active. - R6 Boris–Nadia L; Boris L-L-F, discarded F; Nadia discarded L/enacted L. - R7 Nadia–Otto L; Nadia L-L-F, discarded F, passed L-L; Otto enacted L. - Otto lone Nein R5: suspicion of Greta; R7 L does not clear Fascist. Open questions/owed: - Greta: reconcile R4/R5 reports; R5 accountability. - Rosa: exact R5 received/discarded cards. - Ines: R2/R4 transfers, discards, investigation context. - Lena: R2 exact draw/discard/transfer; late F-F-L claim unverified. Already said: - Greta leading suspect; oppose future Greta governments pending R5 explanation. - Ines repeat-F suspect; challenged R2/R4 reports. - Greta/Rosa contradiction; exclude both next government. - Supported Boris–Nadia test; requested precommitments. - R6 exact report; discarded one Liberal/enacted the other. - Lena silence ruled her out today. - Nominated Otto; Otto–Nadia test, requested exact report and Liberal commitment. - Corrected Otto’s mechanically backwards R7 wording with exact presidential account.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President, both F; R5 account conflicts Rosa; highest concern. - Rosa: R5 Chancellor; conflicts Greta over R5 cards. - Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President, both F; R2/R4 transfers unresolved. - R4 F: Ines/Greta/draw. R5 F: Greta/Rosa/draw. - 3F enacted; Hitler-election threshold active. - Boris: R1 Chancellor L, R3 Chancellor L, R6 President L; currently nominated by Otto. - Otto: R7 Chancellor L; not cleared solely by that result. - Nadia: R6/R7 governments enacted L; R6 discarded F, passed L-L; R7 discarded F, passed L-L. Open questions/owed: - Greta: reconcile R4/R5 reports; R5 accountability. - Rosa: exact R5 received/discarded cards. - Ines: R2/R4 transfers, discards, investigation context. - Lena: R2 exact draw/discard/transfer; late F-F-L claim unverified. - Otto/Boris: precommitment and exact post-election card reports for current government. Already said: - Greta leading suspect; oppose future Greta governments pending R5 explanation. - Ines repeat-F suspect; challenged R2/R4 reports. - Greta/Rosa contradiction; exclude both next government. - Supported Boris–Nadia test; requested precommitments. - R6 exact report; discarded one Liberal/enacted the other. - Lena silence ruled her out today. - Nominated Otto; Otto–Nadia test, requested exact report and Liberal commitment. - Corrected Otto’s mechanically backwards R7 wording with exact presidential account.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President, both F; R5 account conflicts Rosa; highest concern. - Rosa: R5 Chancellor; conflicts Greta over R5 cards. - Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President, both F; R2/R4 transfers unresolved. - R4 F: Ines/Greta/draw. R5 F: Greta/Rosa/draw. - 3F enacted; Hitler-election threshold active. - Boris: R1 Chancellor L, R3 Chancellor L, R6 President L; now nominated by Otto. - Otto: R7 Chancellor L; not cleared as Fascist. - Nadia: R6/R7 governments enacted L; R6/R7 discarded F, passed L-L. Open questions/owed: - Greta: reconcile R4/R5 reports; R5 accountability. - Rosa: exact R5 received/discarded cards. - Ines: R2/R4 transfers, discards, investigation context. - Lena: R2 exact draw/discard/transfer; late F-F-L claim unverified. - Otto/Boris: precommitment and exact post-election reports for current government. Already said: - Greta leading suspect; oppose future Greta governments pending R5 explanation. - Ines repeat-F suspect; challenged R2/R4 reports. - Greta/Rosa contradiction; exclude both next government. - Supported Boris-Nadia test; requested precommitments. - R6 exact report; discarded one Liberal/enacted the other. - Lena silence ruled her out today. - Nominated Otto; requested Otto-Nadia exact report and Liberal commitment. - Corrected Otto's mechanically backwards R7 wording with exact presidential account. - Current: demanded Boris Liberal commitment/exact report and Otto presidential discard/transfer commitment.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President, both F; R5 account conflicts Rosa; highest concern. - Rosa: R5 Chancellor; conflicts Greta over R5 cards. - Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President, both F; R2/R4 transfers unresolved. - R4 F: Ines/Greta/draw. R5 F: Greta/Rosa/draw. - 3F enacted; Hitler-election threshold active; Boris must be treated as possible Hitler despite prior L governments. - Boris: R1 Chancellor L, R3 Chancellor L, R6 President L; now nominated by Otto. - Otto: R7 Chancellor L; not cleared as Fascist. - Nadia: R6/R7 governments enacted L; R6/R7 discarded F, passed L-L. Open questions/owed: - Greta: reconcile R4/R5 reports; R5 accountability. - Rosa: exact R5 received/discarded cards. - Ines: R2/R4 transfers, discards, investigation context. - Lena: R2 exact draw/discard/transfer; late F-F-L claim unverified. - Otto/Boris: precommitment and exact post-election reports for current government; Otto discard/transfer, Boris Liberal commitment. Already said: - Greta leading suspect; oppose future Greta governments pending R5 explanation. - Ines repeat-F suspect; challenged R2/R4 reports. - Greta/Rosa contradiction; exclude both next government. - Supported Boris-Nadia test; requested precommitments. - R6 exact report; discarded one Liberal/enacted the other. - Lena silence ruled her out today. - Nominated Otto; requested Otto-Nadia exact report and Liberal commitment. - Corrected Otto's mechanically backwards R7 wording with exact presidential account. - Demanded Boris Liberal commitment/exact report and Otto presidential discard/transfer commitment. - Current warning: at 3F, Boris's prior L record does not rule out Hitler.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R4 Chancellor + R5 President, both F; R5 account conflicts Rosa; highest concern. - Rosa: R5 Chancellor; conflicts Greta over R5 cards. - Ines: R2 Chancellor + R4 President, both F; R2/R4 transfers unresolved. - R4 F: Ines/Greta/draw. R5 F: Greta/Rosa/draw. - 3F enacted; Hitler-election threshold active; Boris possible Hitler despite prior L governments. - Boris: R1 Chancellor L, R3 Chancellor L, R6 President L; now nominated by Otto. - Otto: R7 Chancellor L; not cleared. - Nadia: R6/R7 governments enacted L; R6/R7 discarded F, passed L-L. Open questions/owed: - Boris: exact R3 and R6 draws, discards, transfers; Liberal commitment current government. - Otto: exact R7 presidential discard/transfer account; current commitment. - Greta: reconcile R4/R5 reports; R5 accountability. - Rosa: exact R5 received/discarded cards. - Ines: R2/R4 transfers, discards, investigation context. - Lena: R2 exact draw/discard/transfer; late F-F-L claim unverified. Already said: - Greta leading suspect; oppose future Greta governments pending R5 explanation. - Ines repeat-F suspect; challenged R2/R4 reports. - Greta/Rosa contradiction; exclude both next government. - Supported Boris-Nadia test; requested precommitments. - R6 exact report; discarded one Liberal/enacted the other. - Lena silence ruled her out today. - Nominated Otto; requested Otto-Nadia exact report and Liberal commitment. - Corrected Otto's mechanically backwards R7 wording with exact presidential account. - Demanded Boris Liberal commitment/exact report and Otto presidential discard/transfer commitment. - Warned at 3F Boris prior L record does not rule out Hitler. - Boris answered R1 only; R3/R6 reports remain unanswered.