Player 6 (Otto)

R1 pre-nomination: no suspects; no evidence; no open questions; no public points made.

R1 pre-vote: no suspects; no evidence. Public points: supported transparency/accounting for Boris-Rosa; baseline government. Open questions: none.

R1 pre-vote: no suspects; no evidence. Public points: supported transparency/accounting for Boris-Rosa; baseline government. Open questions: none.

R1: Boris/Rosa enacted Liberal policy; no specific evidence against either. Voted ja on baseline government. Supported exact card/discard accounting; Nadia and Lena also requested Rosa's account. Ines proposed Greta as clean-baseline Chancellor. R2: Lena/Greta government under discussion; no new evidence against either; no unanswered questions; no public points made this window.

R1: Boris/Rosa enacted Liberal; Boris claimed F/F/L, discarded F, passed F/L; Rosa claimed Boris passed L/L, discarded L, enacted L. Boris/Rosa account conflict; Boris suspicious. R2: Lena/Greta nominated as clean test; no specific evidence against either. Vote ja. Open questions: exact Round 1 cards/accounts remain disputed; Rosa and Boris owe consistency/explanation. Points made aloud: none.

R1: Boris/Rosa enacted Liberal; Boris claimed F/F/L, discarded F, passed F/L; Rosa claimed Boris passed L/L, discarded L, enacted L. Accounts conflict; Boris suspicious, Rosa also owes clarification. R2: Lena/Greta enacted Fascist; no specific evidence against either yet. Vote was Ja. Open: Boris and Rosa have not reconciled exact Round 1 hands/passes. Said aloud: none.

R1: Boris/Rosa enacted Liberal; Boris claimed F/F/L, discarded F, passed F/F; Rosa claimed Boris passed L/L, discarded L, enacted L. Accounts conflict; Boris suspicious, Rosa owes clarification. R2: Lena/Greta enacted Fascist; Lena claims F/F/L, discarded L, passed F/F; Greta owes exact received pair, discard, and reason for Fascist. Open: Boris/Rosa Round 1 hand/pass conflict unanswered; Greta R2 exact pair/discard/reason unanswered. Said aloud: none.

R1: Boris/Rosa enacted Liberal; Boris claimed F/F/L, discarded F, passed F/F; Rosa claimed Boris passed L/L, discarded L, enacted L. Accounts conflict; Boris suspicious, Rosa owes clarification. R2: Lena/Greta enacted Fascist; Lena claims F/F/L, discarded L, passed F/F; Greta owes exact received pair, discard, and reason for Fascist. Open questions: Boris/Rosa R1 hand/pass conflict; Greta R2 exact pair, discard, reason. No points said aloud.

Suspects/evidence: - Boris: R1 government enacted Liberal, but Boris claimed F/F/L -> discarded F, passed F/F; Rosa claimed L/L -> discarded L, enacted L. Direct account conflict. - Lena/Greta: R2 government enacted Fascist; Lena claimed F/F/L -> discarded L, passed F/F; Greta confirmed F/F, discarded F, enacted F. Open questions: - Boris/Rosa R1 hand/pass conflict unresolved; Boris/Rosa owe clarification. - Greta R2 exact pair/discard/reason for enacting Fascist already answered pair/discard, rationale still weak. Points made aloud: - Recommended Rosa nominate someone outside Lena/Greta disputed governments, specifically Nadia or Ines, for a clean test.

Suspects/evidence: - Boris: R1 government enacted Liberal, but Boris claimed F/F/L -> discarded F, passed F/F; Rosa claimed L/L -> discarded L, enacted L. Direct account conflict. - Lena/Greta: R2 government enacted Fascist; Lena claimed F/F/L -> discarded L, passed F/F; Greta confirmed F/F, discarded F, enacted F. Open questions: - Boris/Rosa R1 hand/pass conflict unresolved; Boris/Rosa owe clarification. - Greta R2 rationale for enacting Fascist remains weak despite answering pair/discard. Points made aloud: - Recommended Rosa nominate outside Lena/Greta disputed governments, specifically Nadia or Ines, for a clean test. - Lena backing Nadia does not clear Lena; outcome matters.

Suspects/evidence: - Boris/Rosa R1 government enacted Liberal; Boris claimed F/F/L (discarded F, passed F/F), Rosa claimed L/L (discarded L, enacted L): direct conflict unresolved. - Lena/Greta R2 government enacted Fascist; Lena claimed F/F/L (discarded L, passed F/F), Greta confirmed F/F and enacted F; weak rationale. Open questions: - Boris/Rosa: reconcile R1 hand/pass accounts; unanswered. - Greta: explain why she enacted R2 Fascist; unresolved. Points already made aloud: - Recommended Rosa nominate Nadia or Ines, outside Lena/Greta disputed government, for a clean test. - Lena backing Nadia does not clear Lena; outcomes matter. - Rosa should commit to exact draw, discard, and passed pair afterward.

Suspects/evidence: - Boris/Rosa R1 government enacted Liberal; Boris claimed F/F/L (discarded F, passed F/F), Rosa claimed L/L (discarded L, enacted L): direct conflict unresolved. - Lena/Greta R2 government enacted Fascist; Lena claimed F/F/L (discarded L, passed F/F), Greta confirmed F/F and enacted F; Lena had safer discard, Greta may have been forced. Open questions: - Boris/Rosa: reconcile R1 hand/pass accounts; unanswered. - Greta: explain why she enacted R2 Fascist; unresolved. - Rosa: commit to exact draw, discard, and passed pair after next government. Points already made aloud: - Recommended Rosa nominate Nadia or Ines, outside Lena/Greta disputed government, for a clean test. - Lena backing Nadia does not clear Lena; outcomes matter. - Rosa should commit to exact draw, discard, and passed pair afterward.

Suspects/evidence: - Boris/Rosa R1 government enacted Liberal; Boris claimed F/F/L (discarded F, passed F/F), Rosa claimed L/L (discarded L, enacted L): direct conflict unresolved. - Lena/Greta R2 government enacted Fascist; Lena claimed F/F/L (discarded L, passed F/F), Greta confirmed F/F and enacted F; Lena had safer discard, Greta may have been forced. Open questions: - Boris/Rosa: reconcile R1 hand/pass accounts; unanswered. - Greta: explain why she enacted R2 Fascist; unresolved. - Rosa: commit to exact draw, discard, and passed pair after next government. Points already made aloud: - Recommended Rosa nominate Nadia or Ines, outside Lena/Greta disputed government, for a clean test. - Lena backing Nadia does not clear Lena; outcomes matter. - Rosa should commit to exact draw, discard, and passed pair afterward.

Suspects/evidence: - Boris/Rosa R1 government enacted Liberal; Boris claimed F/F/L (discarded F, passed F/F), Rosa claimed L/L (discarded L, enacted L): direct conflict unresolved. - Lena/Greta R2 government enacted Fascist; Lena claimed F/F/L (discarded L, passed F/F), Greta confirmed F/F and enacted F; Lena had safer discard, Greta may have been forced. Open questions: - Boris/Rosa: reconcile R1 hand/pass accounts; unanswered. - Greta: explain why she enacted R2 Fascist; unresolved. - Rosa/Ines: exact R3 draw, discard, passed pair and received pair/discard after government; pending. Points already made aloud: - Recommended Rosa nominate Nadia or Ines, outside Lena/Greta disputed government, for a clean test. - Lena backing Nadia does not clear Lena; outcomes matter. - Rosa should commit to exact draw, discard, and passed pair afterward.

Suspects/evidence: - Boris/Rosa R1 government enacted Liberal; Boris claimed F/F/L (discarded F, passed F/F), Rosa claimed L/L (discarded L, enacted L): direct conflict unresolved. - Lena/Greta R2 government enacted Fascist; Lena claimed F/F/L (discarded L, passed F/F), Greta confirmed F/F and enacted F; Lena had safer discard, Greta may have been forced. Open questions: - Boris/Rosa: reconcile R1 hand/pass accounts; unanswered. - Greta: explain why she enacted R2 Fascist; unresolved. - Rosa/Ines: exact R3 draw, discard, passed pair and received pair/discard after government; pending. - Ines: commit before vote whether she discards Fascist from L/F; answer still pending. Points already made aloud: - Recommended Rosa nominate Nadia or Ines, outside Lena/Greta disputed government, for a clean test. - Lena backing Nadia does not clear Lena; outcomes matter. - Rosa should commit to exact draw, discard, and passed pair afterward. - Specific commitments do not prove later card claims; evaluate them against enacted outcome and consistency.

Suspects/evidence: - Boris/Rosa R1: Liberal enacted; Boris claimed F/F/L, discarded F, passed F/F; Rosa claimed L/L, discarded L, enacted L; direct conflict unresolved. - Lena/Greta R2: Fascist enacted; Lena claimed F/F/L, discarded L, passed F/F; Greta confirmed F/F and enacted F; Lena had safer discard, Greta may have been forced. - Rosa: selected Ines after R2 Fascist; owns R3 government outcome. Open questions: - Boris/Rosa R1 accounts; Boris and Rosa owe reconciliation. - Greta: why enact R2 Fascist; unresolved. - Rosa/Ines R3 exact draw, discard, passed pair, received pair/discard; pending. - Ines pre-vote commitment on L/F pair; unanswered. Points already made aloud: - Recommended Rosa nominate Nadia or Ines, outside Lena/Greta disputed government. - Lena backing Nadia does not clear Lena. - Rosa should commit exact draw, discard, passed pair. - Specific commitments do not prove card claims; assess outcomes/consistency. - R3: vote Ja; if Fascist, scrutinize Rosa as well as Ines.

Suspects/evidence: - Boris/Rosa R1: Liberal enacted; Boris claimed F/F/L, discarded F, passed F/F; Rosa claimed L/L, discarded L, enacted L; conflict unresolved. - Lena/Greta R2: Fascist enacted; Lena claimed F/F/L, discarded L, passed F/F; Greta confirmed F/F and enacted F; Lena had safer discard, Greta may have been forced. - Rosa: selected Ines after R2 Fascist; responsible for R3 government outcome. Open questions: - Boris/Rosa R1 accounts; both owe reconciliation. - Greta: why enact R2 Fascist; unanswered. - Rosa/Ines R3 exact draw, discard, passed pair, received pair/discard; unanswered. - Ines pre-vote commitment on L/F pair; unanswered. Points already made: - Recommended Rosa nominate Nadia or Ines, outside Lena/Greta disputed government. - Lena backing Nadia does not clear Lena. - Rosa should commit exact draw, discard, passed pair. - Specific commitments do not prove card claims; assess outcomes/consistency. - R3: vote Ja; if Fascist, scrutinize Rosa and Ines.

Suspects/evidence: - Boris/Rosa R1: Liberal enacted; Boris claimed F/F/L, discarded F, passed F/F; Rosa claimed L/L, discarded L, enacted L; unresolved contradiction. - Lena/Greta R2: Fascist enacted; Lena claimed F/F/L, discarded L, passed F/F; Greta confirmed F/F, enacted F; Lena had safer discard, Greta may have been forced. - Rosa: chose Ines after R2 Fascist; accountable for R3 outcome. Open questions: - Boris/Rosa R1 reconciliation; both owe answers. - Greta: why enact R2 Fascist; unanswered. - Rosa/Ines R3 exact draw, discard, passed/received pair; owed after enactment. - Ines: commitment on L/F pair; report outcome. Already said: - Recommended Nadia or Ines, outside Lena/Greta. - Lena backing Nadia does not clear Lena. - Rosa should state exact draw/discard/pass. - Specific commitments are not proof; weigh outcomes/consistency. - Vote Ja; Fascist R3 result scrutinizes Rosa and Ines.

Suspects/evidence: - Boris/Rosa R1: Liberal enacted; Boris claimed F/F/L, discarded F, passed F/F; Rosa claimed L/L, discarded L, enacted L; unresolved contradiction. - Lena/Greta R2: Fascist enacted; Lena claimed F/F/L, discarded L, passed F/F; Greta confirmed F/F, enacted F; Lena had safer discard, Greta may have been forced. - Rosa: chose Ines after R2 Fascist; accountable for R3 outcome. - Rosa/Ines R3: Liberal enacted; outcome clears neither, but government must explain exact cards. Open questions: - Boris/Rosa R1 reconciliation; both owe answers. - Greta: why enact R2 Fascist; unanswered. - Rosa/Ines R3 exact draw, discard, passed/received pair; both owe answer. - Ines: commitment on L/F pair; report outcome. Already said: - Recommended Nadia or Ines, outside Lena/Greta. - Lena backing Nadia does not clear Lena. - Rosa should state exact draw/discard/pass. - Specific commitments are not proof; weigh outcomes/consistency. - Vote Ja; Fascist R3 result scrutinizes Rosa and Ines.

Suspects/evidence: - Boris/Rosa R1: Liberal enacted; Boris claimed F/F/L, discarded F, passed F/F; Rosa claimed L/L, discarded L, enacted L; unresolved contradiction. - Lena/Greta R2: Fascist enacted; Lena claimed F/F/L, discarded L, passed F/F; Greta confirmed F/F, enacted F; Lena had safer discard, Greta may have been forced. - Rosa: chose Ines after R2 Fascist; accountable for R3 outcome. - Rosa/Ines R3: Liberal enacted; outcome clears neither, but government must explain exact cards. Open questions: - Boris/Rosa R1 reconciliation; both owe answers. - Greta: why enact R2 Fascist; unanswered. - Rosa/Ines R3 exact draw, discard, passed/received pair; both owe answer. - Ines: commitment on L/F pair; report outcome. Already said: - Recommended Nadia or Ines, outside Lena/Greta. - Lena backing Nadia does not clear Lena. - Rosa should state exact draw/discard/pass. - Specific commitments are not proof; weigh outcomes/consistency. - Vote Ja; Fascist R3 result scrutinizes Rosa and Ines.

Suspects/evidence: - Boris/Rosa R1: Liberal enacted; Boris claimed F/F/L, discarded F, passed F/F; Rosa claimed L/L, discarded L, enacted L; unresolved contradiction. - Lena/Greta R2: Fascist enacted; Lena claimed F/F/L, discarded L, passed F/F; Greta confirmed F/F, enacted F; Lena had safer discard, Greta may have been forced. - Rosa chose Ines after R2 Fascist; accountable for R3. - Rosa/Ines R3 Liberal enacted; clears neither; exact cards still needed. - Current Ines/Greta nomination repeats Greta after R2 Fascist government; oppose unless compelling explanation. Open questions: - Boris/Rosa R1 reconciliation; both owe answers. - Greta: why enact R2 Fascist; unanswered. - Rosa/Ines R3 exact draw, discard, passed/received pair; both owe answers. - Ines commitment on L/F pair; report outcome. Already said: - Recommended Nadia or Ines, outside Lena/Greta. - Lena backing Nadia does not clear Lena. - Rosa should state exact draw/discard/pass. - Specific commitments are not proof; weigh outcomes/consistency. - Vote Ja; scrutinize Rosa and Ines over R3. - Greta's prior Fascist enactment makes this nomination unsafe.

Suspects/evidence: - Boris/Rosa R1: Liberal enacted; Boris claimed F/F/L, discarded F, passed F/F; Rosa claimed L/L, discarded L, enacted L; unresolved contradiction. - Lena/Greta R2: Fascist enacted; Lena claimed F/F/L, discarded L, passed F/F; Greta confirmed F/F, enacted F; Lena had safer discard, Greta may have been forced. - Rosa chose Ines after R2 Fascist; R3 Liberal; clears neither. - Ines now re-nominated Greta despite Greta's R2 Fascist government; no concrete new evidence offered. Open questions: - Boris/Rosa R1 reconciliation; both owe answers. - Greta: why enact R2 Fascist; unanswered. - Rosa/Ines R3 exact draw, discard, passed/received pair; both owe answers. - Ines: concrete reason Greta is safe now; owed answer. Already said: - Recommended Nadia or Ines, outside Lena/Greta. - Lena backing Nadia does not clear Lena. - Rosa should state exact draw/discard/pass. - Specific commitments are not proof; weigh outcomes/consistency. - Vote Ja; scrutinize Rosa and Ines over R3. - Greta's prior Fascist enactment makes this nomination unsafe. - Asked Ines for new evidence justifying Greta re-nomination; stated vote Nein without it.

Suspects/evidence: - Boris/Rosa R1: Liberal; Boris claimed F/F/L, discarded F, passed F/F; Rosa claimed L/L, discarded L, enacted L; unresolved contradiction. - Lena/Greta R2: Fascist; Lena claimed F/F/L, discarded L, passed F/F; Greta says received F/F, but exact discard/handling missing. - Ines re-nominated Greta after R2 Fascist; no concrete new evidence. - Rosa/Ines R3 Liberal; exact draw/discard/passed pair unresolved. Open questions: - Boris/Rosa R1 reconciliation; both owe answers. - Greta R2 exact received pair and discarded card; Greta owes answer. - Rosa/Ines R3 exact draw, discard, passed/received pair; both owe answers. - Ines concrete reason Greta is safe now; Ines owes answer. Already said: - Recommended Nadia/Ines outside Lena/Greta. - Lena backing Nadia does not clear Lena. - Rosa should state exact draw/discard/pass. - Specific commitments not proof; weigh outcomes/consistency. - Voted Ja R3; scrutinize Rosa/Ines. - Greta's prior Fascist enactment unsafe. - Asked Ines for new evidence; said Nein without it.

Suspects/evidence: - Boris/Rosa R1: Liberal; Boris claimed F/F/L, discarded F, passed F/F; Rosa claimed L/L, discarded L, enacted L; unresolved contradiction. - Lena/Greta R2: Fascist; Lena claimed F/F/L, discarded L, passed F/F; Greta's exact discard/handling missing. - Ines re-nominated Greta after R2 Fascist; no concrete new evidence. - Rosa/Ines R3 Liberal; exact draw/discard/passed pair unresolved. Open questions: - Boris/Rosa R1 reconciliation; both owe answers. - Greta R2 exact received pair/discard; Greta owes answer. - Rosa/Ines R3 exact draw/discard/passed pair; both owe answers. - Ines concrete reason Greta is safe now; Ines owes answer. Already said: - Recommended Nadia/Ines outside Lena/Greta. - Lena backing Nadia does not clear Lena. - Rosa should state exact draw/discard/pass. - Specific commitments not proof; weigh outcomes/consistency. - Voted Ja R3; scrutinize Rosa/Ines. - Greta's prior Fascist enactment unsafe. - Asked Ines for new evidence; said Nein without it. - Asked Greta exact R2 pair and discard; unanswered.

Suspects/evidence: - Boris/Rosa R1: Liberal; Boris claimed F/F/L, discarded F, passed F/F; Rosa claimed L/L, discarded L, enacted L; unresolved contradiction. - Lena/Greta R2: Fascist; Lena claimed F/F/L, discarded L, passed F/F; Greta exact discard/handling unanswered. - Ines re-nominated Greta after R2 Fascist; no concrete new evidence. - Rosa/Ines R3 Liberal; exact draw/discard/passed pair unresolved. Open questions: - Boris/Rosa R1 reconciliation; both owe answers. - Greta R2 exact received pair/discard; Greta owes answer. - Rosa/Ines R3 exact draw/discard/pass; both owe answers. - Ines concrete reason Greta is safe now; Ines owes answer. Already said: - Recommended Nadia/Ines outside Lena/Greta. - Lena backing Nadia does not clear Lena. - Rosa should state exact draw/discard/pass. - Specific commitments not proof; weigh outcomes/consistency. - Voted Ja R3; scrutinize Rosa/Ines. - Greta's prior Fascist enactment unsafe. - Asked Ines for new evidence; said Nein without it. - Asked Greta exact R2 pair and discard; unanswered.

Suspects/evidence: - Boris/Rosa R1: Liberal; Boris claimed F/F/L, discarded F, passed F/F; Rosa claimed L/L, discarded L, enacted L; unresolved contradiction. - Lena/Greta R2: Fascist; Lena claimed F/F/L, discarded L, passed F/F; Greta exact discard/handling unanswered. - Ines re-nominated Greta after R2 Fascist; no concrete new evidence. - Rosa/Ines R3 Liberal; exact draw/discard/pass unresolved. Open questions: - Boris/Rosa R1 reconciliation; both owe answers. - Greta R2 exact received pair/discard; Greta owes answer. - Rosa/Ines R3 exact draw/discard/pass; both owe answers. - Ines concrete reason Greta is safe now; Ines owes answer. Already said: - Recommended Nadia/Ines outside Lena/Greta. - Lena backing Nadia does not clear Lena. - Rosa should state exact draw/discard/pass. - Specific commitments not proof; weigh outcomes/consistency. - Voted Ja R3; scrutinize Rosa/Ines. - Greta’s prior Fascist enactment unsafe. - Asked Ines for new evidence; said Nein without it. - Asked Greta exact R2 pair and discard; unanswered.

Suspects/evidence: - Boris/Rosa R1: Liberal; Boris claimed F/F/L, discarded F, passed F/F; Rosa claimed L/L, discarded L, enacted L; contradiction unresolved. - Lena/Greta R2: Fascist; Lena claimed F/F/L, discarded L, passed F/F; Greta's exact received pair/discard unanswered. - Ines re-nominated Greta after R2 Fascist; no concrete new evidence. - Rosa/Ines R3 Liberal; exact draw/discard/pass unresolved. Open questions: - Boris/Rosa R1 reconciliation; both owe answers. - Greta R2 exact pair/discard; Greta owes answer. - Rosa/Ines R3 exact draw/discard/pass; both owe answer. - Ines concrete reason Greta is safe now; Ines owes answer. Already said: - Recommended Nadia/Ines outside Lena–Greta. - Lena backing Nadia does not clear Lena. - Rosa should state exact draw/discard/pass. - Specific commitments not proof; weigh outcomes/consistency. - Voted Ja R3; scrutinize Rosa/Ines. - Greta's prior Fascist enactment unsafe. - Asked Ines for new evidence; said Nein without it. - Asked Greta exact R2 pair/discard; unanswered. - Repeating Lena–Greta preserves the same ambiguity, not an independent test.

Suspects/evidence: - Lena/Greta R2: only Fascist enactment; Lena claimed F/F/L, discarded L, passed F/F; Greta exact received pair/discard unanswered. - Ines re-nominated Greta R4 despite R2 Fascist; no concrete new evidence offered. - Boris/Rosa R1: Boris claimed F/F/L, discarded F, passed F/F; Rosa claimed L/L, discarded L, enacted L; unresolved. - Rosa/Ines R3 enacted Liberal; exact draw/discard/pass unresolved. Open questions: - Greta owes exact R2 pair/discard. - Ines owes concrete evidence making Greta safe now. - Rosa/Ines owe exact R3 draw/discard/pass. - Boris/Rosa owe reconciliation of R1 claims. Already said: - Recommend Nadia/Ines outside Lena-Greta. - Lena backing Nadia does not clear Lena. - Specific commitments are not proof; weigh outcomes/consistency. - Voted Ja R3; scrutinize Rosa/Ines. - Greta's prior Fascist enactment is unsafe. - Repeating Lena-Greta preserves same ambiguity; not independent test. - Asked Ines for new evidence and Greta for exact R2 pair; unanswered.

Suspects/evidence: - Lena/Greta R2: only Fascist enactment; Lena claimed F/F/L, discarded L, passed F/F; Greta exact received pair/discard unanswered. - Ines re-nominated Greta R4 despite R2 Fascist; no concrete new evidence offered. - Boris/Rosa R1: Boris claimed F/F/L, discarded F, passed F/F; Rosa claimed L/L, discarded L, enacted L; unresolved. - Rosa/Ines R3 enacted Liberal; exact draw/discard/pass unresolved. Open questions: - Greta owes exact R2 pair/discard. - Ines owes concrete evidence making Greta safe now. - Rosa/Ines owe exact R3 draw/discard/pass. - Boris/Rosa owe reconciliation of R1 claims. Already said: - Recommend Nadia/Ines outside Lena-Greta. - Lena backing Nadia does not clear Lena. - Specific commitments are not proof; weigh outcomes/consistency. - Voted Ja R3; scrutinize Rosa/Ines. - Greta's prior Fascist enactment is unsafe. - Repeating Lena-Greta preserves same ambiguity; not independent test. - Asked Ines for new evidence and Greta for exact R2 pair; unanswered.

Suspects/evidence: - Lena/Greta R2: only Fascist enactment; Lena claimed F/F/L, discarded L, passed F/F; Greta claims received L/F, discarded F; exact account unresolved. - Ines re-nominated Greta R4 despite R2 Fascist; no concrete new evidence offered. - Boris/Rosa R1: Boris claimed F/F/L, discarded F, passed F/F; Rosa claimed L/L, discarded L, enacted L; unresolved. - Rosa/Ines R3 enacted Liberal; exact draw/discard/pass unresolved. Open questions: - Greta owes exact R2 pair/discard. - Ines owes concrete evidence making Greta safe now and rationale for nomination. - Rosa/Ines owe exact R3 draw/discard/pass. - Boris/Rosa owe reconciliation of R1 claims. Already said: - Recommend Nadia/Ines outside Lena-Greta. - Lena backing Nadia does not clear Lena. - Specific commitments not proof; weigh outcomes/consistency. - Voted Ja R3; scrutinize Rosa/Ines. - Greta's prior Fascist enactment unsafe. - Repeating Lena-Greta preserves same ambiguity; not independent test. - Asked Ines for new evidence and Greta for exact R2 pair; unanswered.

Suspects/evidence: - Lena/Greta R2: only Fascist enactment; Lena claimed F/F/L, discarded L, passed F/F; Greta pair/discard unresolved. - Ines re-nominated Greta R4 despite R2 Fascist; no new evidence. - Boris/Rosa R1 claims unresolved. - Rosa/Ines R3 Liberal; exact accounts unresolved. Open questions: - Greta owes exact R2 received pair and discard. - Ines owes rationale/new evidence for nominating Greta. - Rosa/Ines owe exact R3 draw/discard/pass. - Boris/Rosa owe R1 reconciliation. Already said: - Recommend Nadia/Ines over Lena-Greta; Lena backing Nadia does not clear Lena. - Specific commitments are not proof; weigh outcomes/consistency. - Voted Ja R3; scrutinize Rosa/Ines. - Greta's prior Fascist enactment unsafe; repeating Lena-Greta is not an independent test. - Asked Ines for new evidence and Greta for exact R2 pair; unanswered.

Suspects/evidence: - Lena/Greta R2: only Fascist enactment; Lena claims F/F/L, discarded L, passed F/F; Greta's exact pair/discard unresolved. - Ines R4 re-nominated Greta despite R2 Fascist; no independent new evidence. - Boris/Rosa R1 claims unresolved. - Rosa/Ines R3 Liberal; exact accounts unresolved. Open questions: - Greta owes exact R2 received pair/discard; asked, unanswered. - Ines owes concrete rationale/new evidence for Greta R4; asked, unanswered. - Rosa/Ines owe exact R3 draw/discard/pass. - Boris/Rosa owe R1 reconciliation. Already said: - Prefer Nadia/Ines over Lena-Greta; repeating pair is not independent. - Specific commitments are not proof; weigh outcomes/consistency. - Voted Ja R3; scrutinize Rosa/Ines. - Greta's prior Fascist government remains unsafe. - Asked Ines for new evidence and Greta for exact R2 pair. - R4: challenged Greta accepting repeat government while R2 remains unverified; requested fresh pairing to clear herself.

Suspects/evidence: - Lena/Greta R2: sole Fascist enactment; Lena claims F/F/L, discarded L, passed F/F; Greta's received pair/discard unresolved. - Ines R4 re-nominated Greta despite R2 Fascist; rationale/new evidence unanswered. - Boris/Rosa R1 unresolved. - Rosa/Ines R3 Liberal; exact accounts unresolved. Open questions: - Greta owes exact R2 received pair/discard; unanswered. - Ines owes concrete new rationale for R4 Greta nomination; unanswered. - Rosa/Ines owe exact R3 draw/discard/pass. - Boris/Rosa owe R1 reconciliation. Already said: - Prefer Nadia/Ines over Lena-Greta; repeat is not independent. - Specific commitments are not proof; weigh outcomes/consistency. - Voted Ja R3; scrutinize Rosa/Ines. - Greta's prior Fascist government unsafe. - Asked Ines for new evidence and Greta for exact R2 pair. - Challenged Greta accepting repeat government; requested fresh pairing. - Lena's mechanical conditional increases need for exact R2 accounting, not clearance.

Suspects/evidence: - Lena/Greta R2: sole Fascist enactment; Lena claims F/F/L, discarded L, passed F/F; Greta's exact received pair/discard unresolved. - Ines R4: re-nominated Greta despite R2 Fascist; no concrete independent evidence. - Boris/Rosa R1: unresolved account contradiction. - Rosa/Ines R3: Liberal enacted; exact accounts unresolved. Open questions: - Greta owes exact R2 received pair/discard; unanswered. - Ines owes concrete rationale/new evidence for R4 Greta nomination; unanswered. - Rosa/Ines owe exact R3 draw/discard/pass. - Boris/Rosa owe R1 reconciliation. Already said: - Prefer Nadia/Ines over Lena-Greta; repeat is not independent. - Specific commitments are not proof; weigh outcomes/consistency. - Voted Ja R3; scrutinize Rosa/Ines. - Greta's prior Fascist government unsafe. - Asked Ines for new evidence and Greta for exact R2 pair. - Challenged Greta accepting repeat government; requested fresh pairing. - Lena's mechanical conditional increases need for exact R2 accounting, not clearance. - R4 Nein: repeat government remains unsafe; current precommitment does not resolve R2.

Suspects/evidence: - Lena/Greta R2: sole Fascist enactment; Lena claims F/F/L, discarded L, passed F/F; Greta's exact received pair/discard unresolved. - Ines R4: re-nominated Greta despite R2 Fascist; no concrete independent evidence. - Boris/Rosa R1: unresolved account contradiction. - Rosa/Ines R3: Liberal enacted; exact accounts unresolved. Open questions: - Greta owes exact R2 received pair/discard; unanswered. - Ines owes concrete rationale/new evidence for R4 Greta nomination; unanswered. - Rosa/Ines owe exact R3 draw/discard/pass. - Boris/Rosa owe R1 reconciliation. Already said: - Prefer Nadia/Ines over Lena-Greta; repeat is not independent. - Specific commitments are not proof; weigh outcomes/consistency. - Voted Ja R3; scrutinize Rosa/Ines. - Greta's prior Fascist government unsafe. - Asked Ines for new evidence and Greta for exact R2 pair. - Challenged Greta accepting repeat government; requested fresh pairing. - Lena's mechanical conditional increases need for exact R2 accounting, not clearance. - R4 Nein: repeat government remains unsafe; current precommitment does not resolve R2.

Suspects/evidence: - Lena/Greta R2: sole Fascist enactment; Lena claims F/F/L, discarded L, passed F/F; Greta's exact received pair/discard unresolved. - Ines R4: re-nominated Greta despite R2 Fascist; no concrete independent evidence. - Boris/Rosa R1: unresolved account contradiction. - Rosa/Ines R3: Liberal enacted; exact accounts unresolved. - Current Greta/Nadia government: Greta's R2 Fascist-government history remains unresolved; Nadia's record untested. Open questions: - Greta owes exact R2 received pair/discard; unanswered. - Ines owes concrete rationale/new evidence for R4 Greta nomination; unanswered. - Rosa/Ines owe exact R3 draw/discard/pass. - Boris/Rosa owe R1 reconciliation. Already said: - Prefer Nadia/Ines over Lena-Greta; repeat is not independent. - Specific commitments are not proof; weigh outcomes/consistency. - Voted Ja R3; scrutinize Rosa/Ines. - Greta's prior Fascist government unsafe. - Asked Ines for new evidence and Greta for exact R2 pair. - Challenged Greta accepting repeat government; requested fresh pairing. - Lena's mechanical conditional increases need for exact R2 accounting, not clearance. - R4 Nein: repeat government remains unsafe; current precommitment does not resolve R2.

Suspects/evidence: - Lena/Greta R2: sole Fascist enactment; Lena claims F/F/L, discarded L, passed F/F; Greta's exact received pair/discard unresolved. - Ines R4: re-nominated Greta despite R2 Fascist; rationale/new evidence unanswered. - Boris/Rosa R1: unresolved account contradiction. - Rosa/Ines R3: Liberal enacted; exact accounts unresolved. - Greta/Nadia current: Nadia untested, but Greta controls presidential initial discard; Fascist result implicates Greta too. Open questions: - Greta owes exact R2 received pair/discard. - Ines owes rationale for R4 Greta nomination. - Rosa/Ines owe exact R3 draw/discard/pass. - Boris/Rosa owe R1 reconciliation. Already said: - Prefer Nadia/Ines over Lena-Greta; repeated government unsafe. - Specific commitments are not proof; weigh outcomes/consistency. - Voted Ja R3; scrutinize Rosa/Ines. - Asked Greta for exact R2 pair; asked Ines for new evidence. - Lena's conditional increases need for exact R2 accounting. - R4 Nein: precommitment does not resolve R2. - Current government should not be treated as clean test of Nadia because Greta controls the first discard.

Suspects/evidence: - Lena/Greta R2: sole Fascist enactment; Lena claims F/F/L, discarded L, passed F/F; Greta's exact received pair/discard unresolved. - Ines R4: re-nominated Greta despite R2 Fascist; rationale/new evidence unanswered. - Boris/Rosa R1: unresolved account contradiction. - Rosa/Ines R3: Liberal enacted; exact accounts unresolved. - Greta/Nadia current: Nadia untested, but Greta controls presidential initial discard; Fascist result implicates Greta too. Open questions: - Greta owes exact R2 received pair/discard; must answer Nadia's disclosure challenge. - Ines owes rationale for R4 Greta nomination. - Rosa/Ines owe exact R3 draw/discard/pass. - Boris/Rosa owe R1 reconciliation. Already said: - Prefer Nadia/Ines over Lena-Greta; repeated government unsafe. - Specific commitments are not proof; weigh outcomes/consistency. - Voted Ja R3; scrutinize Rosa/Ines. - Asked Greta for exact R2 pair; asked Ines for new evidence. - Lena's conditional increases need for exact R2 accounting. - R4 Nein: precommitment does not resolve R2. - Current government should not be treated as clean test of Nadia because Greta controls the first discard. - Nadia's demand for Greta's exact R2 account is appropriate; Greta's response should affect this vote.

Suspects/evidence: - Lena/Greta R2: sole Fascist enactment; Lena claims F/F/L, discarded L, passed F/F; Greta's received pair/discard unresolved. - Ines R4: re-nominated Greta despite R2 Fascist; rationale/new evidence unanswered. - Boris/Rosa R1: unresolved account contradiction. - Rosa/Ines R3: Liberal enacted; exact accounts unresolved. - Greta/Nadia current: Nadia untested; Greta controls presidential initial discard, so Fascist result implicates Greta too. Open questions: - Greta owes exact R2 received pair/discard; Nadia asks disclosure. - Nadia: will she vote Nein unless Greta gives exact R2 account before vote? - Nadia owes pre-vote commitment for F/F disclosure. - Ines owes rationale for R4 Greta nomination. - Rosa/Ines owe exact R3 draw/discard/pass. - Boris/Rosa owe R1 reconciliation. Already said: - Prefer fresh test over Lena-Greta repeat; repeated government unsafe. - Specific commitments are not proof; weigh outcomes/consistency. - Voted Ja R3; scrutinize Rosa/Ines. - Asked Greta exact R2 pair; asked Ines new evidence. - Lena conditional increases need for exact R2 accounting. - R4 Nein: precommitment does not resolve R2. - Current government not clean test of Nadia because Greta controls first discard. - Nadia's demand for Greta's exact R2 account appropriate; Greta's response should affect vote.

Suspects/evidence: - Lena/Greta R2: sole Fascist enactment; Lena claims F/F/L, discarded L, passed F/F; Greta's received pair/discard unresolved. - Ines R4: re-nominated Greta despite R2 Fascist; rationale/new evidence unanswered. - Boris/Rosa R1: unresolved account contradiction. - Rosa/Ines R3: Liberal enacted; exact accounts unresolved. - Greta/Nadia current: Nadia untested; Greta controls presidential initial discard, so Fascist result implicates Greta too. Open questions: - Greta owes exact R2 received pair/discard; Nadia asks disclosure. - Nadia: vote Nein unless Greta gives exact R2 account before vote? F/F disclosure commitment? - Ines owes rationale for R4 Greta nomination. - Rosa/Ines owe exact R3 draw/discard/pass. - Boris/Rosa owe R1 reconciliation. Already said: - Prefer fresh test over Lena-Greta repeat; repeated government unsafe. - Specific commitments are not proof; weigh outcomes/consistency. - Voted Ja R3; scrutinize Rosa/Ines. - Asked Greta exact R2 pair; asked Ines new evidence. - Lena conditional increases need for exact R2 accounting. - R4 Nein: precommitment does not resolve R2. - Current government not clean test of Nadia because Greta controls first discard. - Nadia's demand for Greta's exact R2 account appropriate; Greta's response should affect vote.

Suspects/evidence: - Lena/Greta R2: sole Fascist enactment; Lena claims L/F/F and passed F/F; Greta still has not disclosed exact received pair/discard. - Greta current R5: controls presidential discard; Nadia is untested, so a Fascist result would implicate Greta too. - Ines R4: re-nominated Greta after R2 Fascist; rationale/new evidence unanswered. - Boris/Rosa R1 and Rosa/Ines R3: policy accounts unresolved, though R1/R3 were Liberal. Open questions: - Greta owes exact R2 pair/discard; Nadia requested it before vote, unanswered. - Nadia: F/F disclosure commitment not fully answered; conditional Nein unless Greta accounts. - Ines owes concrete reason for R4 Greta nomination. - Rosa/Ines exact R3 draw/discard/pass; Boris/Rosa R1 reconciliation. Already said: - Prefer fresh test over Lena-Greta repeat; commitments are not proof. - Asked Greta exact R2 pair and Ines for new evidence. - R4 Nein: precommitment did not resolve R2. - Current Greta/Nadia is not a clean Nadia test because Greta controls first discard. - Voted Ja R3; scrutinize Rosa/Ines.

Suspects/evidence: - Lena/Greta R2: sole earlier Fascist enactment; Lena claims L/F/F and passed F/F; Greta still owes exact received pair/discard. - Greta/Nadia R5: second Fascist enactment; Greta controlled presidential discard, so both implicated, especially Greta. - Ines R4: re-nominated Greta after R2 Fascist; concrete rationale unanswered. - Boris/Rosa R1 and Rosa/Ines R3: Liberal outcomes, but policy accounts unresolved. Open questions: - Greta: exact R2 pair/discard; no answer. - Nadia: exact R5 cards/discard/pass; commitment to disclose F/F not fully answered. - Ines: concrete new evidence for R4 Greta nomination. - Rosa/Ines: exact R3 draw/discard/pass; Boris/Rosa R1 reconciliation. Already said: - Prefer fresh test over Lena-Greta repeat; commitments are not proof. - Asked Greta exact R2 pair and Ines for new evidence. - R4 Nein: precommitment did not resolve R2. - Greta/Nadia R5 not a clean Nadia test because Greta controls first discard. - Voted Ja R3; scrutinize Rosa/Ines.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R2 Chancellor during Fascist enactment; R5 President during second Fascist enactment; common link, controlled R5 presidential discard; exact cards still undisclosed. - Nadia: R5 Chancellor during Fascist enactment; exact received pair/discard/pass undisclosed. - Lena/Greta R2: sole earlier Fascist enactment; Lena claims L/F/F passed F/F; Greta exact pair/discard unanswered. - Ines: R4 re-nominated Greta after R2 Fascist; rationale unanswered. - Boris/Rosa R1 and Rosa/Ines R3: Liberal outcomes, accounts unresolved. Open questions: - Greta: exact R2 pair/discard; exact R5 presidential 3-card draw, discarded card, and passed pair. - Nadia: exact R5 pair/discard/pass, including any F/F handling. - Ines: concrete new evidence for R4 Greta nomination. - Rosa/Ines: exact R3 draw/discard/pass; Boris/Rosa R1 reconciliation. Already said: - Fresh test preferable to Lena-Greta repeat; commitments not proof. - Asked Greta exact R2 pair; asked Ines for new evidence. - R4 Nein: precommitment did not resolve R2. - R5 Greta/Nadia not clean Nadia test because Greta controls first discard. - Voted Ja R3; scrutinize Rosa/Ines. - After R5: Greta common link in both Fascist governments; demanded exact R5 presidential draw/discard and Nadia pair/discard; named Greta leading suspect.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R2 Chancellor during Fascist enactment; R5 President during second Fascist enactment; common link; controlled R5 presidential discard; exact cards undisclosed. - Nadia: R5 Chancellor during Fascist enactment; exact received pair/discard/pass undisclosed. - Lena/Greta R2: sole earlier Fascist enactment; Lena claims L/F/F passed F/F; Greta exact pair/discard unanswered. - Ines: R4 re-nominated Greta after R2 Fascist; rationale unanswered. - Boris/Rosa R1 and Rosa/Ines R3: Liberal outcomes; accounts unresolved. Open questions: - Greta: exact R2 pair/discard; exact R5 presidential 3-card draw, discard, passed pair. - Nadia: exact R5 pair/discard/pass, including F/F handling. - Ines: concrete new evidence for R4 Greta nomination. - Rosa/Ines: exact R3 draw/discard/pass; Boris/Rosa R1 reconciliation. Already said: - Fresh test preferable to Lena-Greta repeat; commitments not proof. - Asked Greta exact R2 pair; asked Ines for new evidence. - R4 Nein: precommitment did not resolve R2. - R5 Greta/Nadia not clean Nadia test because Greta controls first discard. - Voted Ja R3; scrutinize Rosa/Ines. - After R5: Greta common link in both Fascist governments; demanded exact R5 presidential draw/discard and Nadia pair/discard; named Greta leading suspect.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R2 Chancellor during Fascist enactment; R5 President during second Fascist enactment; only common link; controlled R5 first discard; claims L/F/F, discarded F, passed L/F. - Nadia: R5 Chancellor during Fascist enactment; claims received F/F, but has not named exact pair/discard/pass despite commitment. - Lena/Greta R2: sole earlier Fascist enactment; Lena claims L/F/F passed F/F; Greta exact pair/discard unanswered. - Ines: R4 re-nominated Greta after R2 Fascist; rationale unanswered. - Rosa/Ines: R3 Liberal outcome; exact accounts unresolved. Open questions: - Greta owes exact R2 pair/discard and exact R5 draw/discard/passed pair. - Nadia owes exact R5 received pair, discarded card, and enacted card. - Ines owes concrete evidence for R4 Greta nomination. - Rosa/Ines owe exact R3 draw/discard/pass; Boris/Rosa R1 reconciliation. Already said: - Fresh test preferable to Lena-Greta repeat; commitments not proof. - Asked Greta exact R2 pair; asked Ines for new evidence. - R4 Nein: precommitment did not resolve R2. - R5 Greta/Nadia not clean Nadia test because Greta controls first discard. - Voted Ja R3; scrutinize Rosa/Ines. - After R5: Greta common link in both Fascist governments; demanded exact R5 presidential draw/discard and Nadia pair/discard; named Greta leading suspect. - Current: Greta and Nadia accounts directly conflict; both must reconcile exact Round 5 cards.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R2 Chancellor during Fascist enactment; R5 President during second Fascist enactment; only common link; controlled R5 first discard; claims L/F/F, discarded F, passed L/F, mechanically conflicts with Nadia F/F. - Nadia: R5 Chancellor during Fascist enactment; claims received F/F, but has not named exact cards/discard/enacted card despite commitment. - Lena/Greta R2: sole earlier Fascist enactment; Lena claims L/F/F passed F/F; Greta exact pair/discard unanswered. - Ines: R4 re-nominated Greta after R2 Fascist; rationale unanswered. - Rosa/Ines: R3 Liberal outcome; exact accounts unresolved. Open questions: - Greta: exact R2 pair/discard; exact R5 draw/discard/passed pair; explain claimed L/F becoming Nadia F/F. - Nadia: exact R5 received pair, discarded card, enacted card. - Ines: concrete evidence for R4 Greta nomination. - Rosa/Ines: exact R3 draw/discard/pass; Boris/Rosa R1 reconciliation. Already said: - Fresh test preferable to Lena-Greta repeat; commitments not proof. - Asked Greta exact R2 pair; asked Ines for new evidence. - R4 Nein: precommitment did not resolve R2. - R5 Greta/Nadia not clean Nadia test because Greta controls first discard. - Voted Ja R3; scrutinize Rosa/Ines. - After R5: Greta common link in both Fascist governments; demanded exact R5 presidential draw/discard and Nadia pair/discard; named Greta leading suspect. - Greta and Nadia accounts directly conflict; both must reconcile exact R5 cards.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R2 Chancellor during Fascist enactment; R5 President during second Fascist enactment; only common link. R5 claimed L/F/F conflicts with Nadia's F/F receipt; controlled first discard. - Nadia: R5 Chancellor during Fascist enactment; says Greta passed F/F, but exact received pair/discard/enacted card still omitted. - Lena/Greta R2: sole earlier Fascist enactment; Lena claims L/F/F passed F/F; Greta exact pair/discard unanswered. - Ines: R4 re-nominated Greta after R2 Fascist; rationale unanswered. - Rosa/Ines: R3 Liberal outcome; exact accounts unresolved. Open questions: - Greta: exact R2 pair/discard; exact R5 draw/discard/passed pair; reconcile claimed L/F pass with Nadia F/F. - Nadia: exact R5 received pair, discarded card, enacted card. - Ines: concrete evidence for R4 Greta nomination. - Rosa/Ines: exact R3 draw/discard/pass; Boris/Rosa R1 reconciliation. Already said: - Fresh test preferable to Lena-Greta repeat; commitments not proof. - Asked Greta exact R2 pair; asked Ines for new evidence. - R4 Nein: precommitment did not resolve R2. - R5 Greta/Nadia not clean Nadia test because Greta controls first discard. - Voted Ja R3; scrutinize Rosa/Ines. - Greta common link in both Fascist governments; demanded exact R5 presidential draw/discard and Nadia pair/discard; named Greta leading suspect. - Greta and Nadia accounts directly conflict; both must reconcile exact R5 cards.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R2 Chancellor during Fascist enactment; R5 President during second Fascist enactment; only common link. R5 claims L/F/F conflicts with Nadia's F/F receipt; controlled first discard. - Nadia: R5 Chancellor during Fascist enactment; says Greta passed F/F, exact received pair/discard/enacted card omitted. - Lena/Greta R2: sole earlier Fascist enactment; Lena claims L/F/F passed F/F; Greta exact pair/discard unanswered. - Ines: R4 re-nominated Greta after R2 Fascist; rationale unanswered. - Rosa/Ines: R3 Liberal outcome; exact accounts unresolved. Open questions: - Greta: exact R2 pair/discard; exact R5 draw/discard/passed pair; reconcile claimed L/F pass with Nadia F/F. - Nadia: exact R5 received pair, discarded card, enacted card. - Ines: concrete evidence for R4 Greta nomination. - Rosa/Ines: exact R3 draw/discard/pass; Boris/Rosa R1 reconciliation. Already said: - Fresh test preferable to Lena-Greta repeat; commitments not proof. - Asked Greta exact R2 pair; asked Ines for new evidence. - R4 Nein: precommitment did not resolve R2. - R5 Greta/Nadia not clean Nadia test because Greta controls first discard. - Voted Ja R3; scrutinize Rosa/Ines. - Greta common link in both Fascist governments; demanded exact R5 presidential draw/discard and Nadia pair/discard; named Greta leading suspect. - Greta and Nadia accounts directly conflict; both must reconcile exact R5 cards. - New: at 2F, next government should exclude both Greta and Nadia; their mutually conflicting accounts do not clear either.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R2 Chancellor during Fascist enactment; R5 President during second Fascist enactment; only common link. R5 claims L/F/F conflicts with Nadia's F/F receipt; controlled first discard. - Nadia: R5 Chancellor during Fascist enactment; says Greta passed F/F; exact received pair/discard/enacted card omitted. - Lena/Greta R2: sole earlier Fascist enactment; Lena claims L/F/F passed F/F; Greta exact pair/discard unanswered. - Ines: R4 re-nominated Greta after R2 Fascist; rationale unanswered. - Rosa/Ines: R3 Liberal outcome; exact accounts unresolved. Open questions: - Greta: exact R2 pair/discard; exact R5 draw/discard/passed pair; reconcile claimed L/F pass with Nadia F/F. - Nadia: exact R5 received pair, discarded card, enacted card. - Ines: concrete evidence for R4 Greta nomination. - Rosa/Ines: exact R3 draw/discard/pass; Boris/Rosa R1 reconciliation. Already said: - Fresh test preferable to Lena-Greta repeat; commitments not proof. - Asked Greta exact R2 pair; asked Ines for new evidence. - R4 Nein: precommitment did not resolve R2. - R5 Greta/Nadia not clean Nadia test because Greta controls first discard. - Voted Ja R3; scrutinize Rosa/Ines. - Greta common link in both Fascist governments; demanded exact R5 presidential draw/discard and Nadia pair/discard; named Greta leading suspect. - Greta and Nadia accounts directly conflict; both must reconcile exact R5 cards. - At 2F, next government should exclude both Greta and Nadia; conflicting accounts clear neither.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R2 Chancellor during Fascist enactment; R5 President during second Fascist enactment; only common link. R5 claims L/F/F conflicts with Nadia's F/F receipt; controlled first discard. - Nadia: R5 Chancellor during Fascist enactment; says Greta passed F/F; exact received pair/discard/enacted card omitted. - Lena/Greta R2: sole earlier Fascist enactment; Lena claims L/F/F passed F/F; Greta exact pair/discard unanswered. - Ines: R4 re-nominated Greta after R2 Fascist; rationale unanswered. - Rosa/Ines: R3 Liberal outcome; exact accounts unresolved. Open questions: - Greta: exact R2 pair/discard; exact R5 draw/discard/passed pair; reconcile claimed L/F pass with Nadia F/F. - Nadia: exact R5 received pair, discarded card, enacted card. - Ines: concrete evidence for R4 Greta nomination. - Rosa/Ines: exact R3 draw/discard/pass; Boris/Rosa R1 reconciliation. Already said: - Fresh test preferable to Lena-Greta repeat; commitments not proof. - Asked Greta exact R2 pair; asked Ines for new evidence. - R4 Nein: precommitment did not resolve R2. - R5 Greta/Nadia not clean Nadia test because Greta controls first discard. - Voted Ja R3; scrutinize Rosa/Ines. - Greta common link in both Fascist governments; demanded exact R5 presidential draw/discard and Nadia pair/discard; named Greta leading suspect. - Greta and Nadia accounts directly conflict; both must reconcile exact R5 cards. - At 2F, next government should exclude both Greta and Nadia; conflicting accounts clear neither.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R2 Chancellor during Fascist enactment; R5 President during second Fascist enactment; only common link. R5 claims L/F/F conflicts with Nadia's F/F receipt; controlled first discard. - Nadia: R5 Chancellor during Fascist enactment; exact received pair/discard/enacted card unanswered. - Lena/Greta R2: sole earlier Fascist enactment; Greta exact pair/discard unanswered. - Ines: R4 re-nominated Greta after R2 Fascist; rationale unanswered. - Rosa/Ines: R3 Liberal outcome; exact accounts unresolved. Open questions: - Greta: exact R2 pair/discard; exact R5 draw/discard/passed pair; reconcile claimed L/F pass with Nadia F/F. - Nadia: exact R5 received pair, discarded card, enacted card. - Ines: concrete evidence for R4 Greta nomination. - Rosa/Ines: exact R3 draw/discard/pass; Boris/Rosa R1 reconciliation. Already said: - Fresh test preferable to Lena-Greta repeat; commitments not proof. - Asked Greta exact R2 pair; asked Ines for new evidence. - R4 Nein: precommitment did not resolve R2. - R5 Greta/Nadia not clean Nadia test because Greta controls first discard. - Voted Ja R3; scrutinize Rosa/Ines. - Greta common link in both Fascist governments; demanded exact R5 presidential draw/discard and Nadia pair/discard; named Greta leading suspect. - Greta and Nadia accounts directly conflict; both must reconcile exact R5 cards. - At 2F, next government should exclude both Greta and Nadia; conflicting accounts clear neither.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R2 Chancellor during Fascist enactment; R5 President during second Fascist enactment; only common link. R5 claims L/F/F conflicts with Nadia's F/F receipt; controlled first discard. - Nadia: R5 Chancellor during Fascist enactment; exact received pair/discard/enacted card unanswered. - Lena/Greta R2: sole earlier Fascist enactment; Greta exact pair/discard unanswered. - Ines: R4 re-nominated Greta after R2 Fascist; rationale unanswered. - Rosa/Ines: R3 Liberal outcome; exact accounts unresolved. Open questions: - Greta: exact R2 pair/discard; exact R5 draw/discard/passed pair; reconcile claimed L/F/F pass with Nadia F/F. - Nadia: exact R5 received pair, discarded card, enacted card. - Ines: concrete evidence for R4 Greta nomination. - Rosa/Ines: exact R3 draw/discard/pass; Boris/Rosa R1 reconciliation. Already said: - Fresh test preferable to Lena-Greta repeat; commitments not proof. - Asked Greta exact R2 pair; asked Ines for new evidence. - R4 Nein: precommitment did not resolve R2. - R5 Greta/Nadia not clean Nadia test because Greta controls first discard. - Voted Ja R3; scrutinize Rosa/Ines. - Greta common link in both Fascist governments; demanded exact R5 presidential draw/discard and Nadia pair/discard; named Greta leading suspect. - Greta and Nadia accounts directly conflict; both must reconcile exact R5 cards. - At 2F, next government should exclude both Greta and Nadia; conflicting accounts clear neither. - Investigation of Lena may add information, but a result cannot exonerate Greta or Nadia from the R5 card-flow conflict.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R2 Chancellor during Fascist enactment; R5 President during second Fascist enactment; only common link. R5 claims L/F/F conflicts with Nadia's F/F receipt; controlled first discard. - Nadia: R5 Chancellor during Fascist enactment; exact received pair/discard/enacted card unanswered. - Lena/Greta R2: sole earlier Fascist enactment; Greta exact pair/discard unanswered. - Ines: R4 re-nominated Greta after R2 Fascist; rationale unanswered. - Rosa/Ines: R3 Liberal outcome; exact accounts unresolved. Open questions: - Greta: exact R2 pair/discard; exact R5 draw/discard/passed pair; reconcile claimed L/F/F pass with Nadia F/F. - Nadia: exact R5 received pair, discarded card, enacted card. - Ines: concrete evidence for R4 Greta nomination. - Rosa/Ines: exact R3 draw/discard/pass; Boris/Rosa R1 reconciliation. Already said: - Fresh test preferable to Lena-Greta repeat; commitments not proof. - Asked Greta exact R2 pair; asked Ines for new evidence. - R4 Nein: precommitment did not resolve R2. - R5 Greta/Nadia not clean Nadia test because Greta controls first discard. - Voted Ja R3; scrutinize Rosa/Ines. - Greta common link in both Fascist governments; demanded exact R5 presidential draw/discard and Nadia pair/discard; named Greta leading suspect. - Greta and Nadia accounts directly conflict; both must reconcile exact R5 cards. - At 2F, next government should exclude both Greta and Nadia; conflicting accounts clear neither. - Investigation of Lena may add information, but a result cannot exonerate Greta or Nadia from the R5 card-flow conflict.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R2 Chancellor and R5 President during both Fascist enactments; common link. R5 claims L/F/F conflicts with Nadia's F/F receipt; controlled first discard. - Nadia: R5 Chancellor during Fascist enactment; exact received pair/discard/enacted card unanswered. - Lena/Greta: R2 Fascist enactment; exact accounts unresolved. - Ines: R4 re-nominated Greta after R2 Fascist; rationale unanswered. - Rosa/Ines: R3 Liberal outcome; exact accounts unresolved. Open questions: - Greta: exact R2 pair/discard; exact R5 draw/discard/passed pair; reconcile L/F/F claim with Nadia F/F. - Nadia: exact R5 received pair, discarded card, enacted card. - Ines: concrete evidence for R4 Greta nomination. - Rosa/Ines: exact R3 draw/discard/pass; Boris/Rosa R1 reconciliation. Already said: - Fresh test preferable to Lena-Greta repeat; commitments not proof. - Asked Greta exact R2 pair; asked Ines for new evidence. - R4 Nein did not resolve R2. - R5 Greta/Nadia not clean Nadia test because Greta controls first discard. - Voted Ja R3; scrutinize Rosa/Ines. - Greta common link in both Fascist governments; demanded exact R5 card flow; named Greta leading suspect. - Greta and Nadia accounts directly conflict; both must reconcile exact R5 cards. - At 2F, next government should exclude both Greta and Nadia; conflict clears neither. - Lena investigation cannot exonerate Greta or Nadia from R5 conflict.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R2 Chancellor and R5 President during both Fascist enactments; common link. R5 claims L/F/F conflicts with Nadia's F/F receipt; controlled first discard. - Nadia: R5 Chancellor during Fascist enactment; exact received pair/discard/enacted card unanswered. - Lena/Greta: R2 Fascist enactment; exact accounts unresolved. - Ines: R4 re-nominated Greta after R2 Fascist; rationale unanswered. - Rosa/Ines: R3 Liberal outcome; exact accounts unresolved. Open questions: - Greta: exact R2 pair/discard; exact R5 draw/discard/passed pair; reconcile L/F/F claim with Nadia F/F. - Nadia: exact R5 received pair, discarded card, enacted card. - Ines: concrete evidence for R4 Greta nomination. - Rosa/Ines: exact R3 draw/discard/pass; Boris/Rosa R1 reconciliation. Already said: - Fresh test preferable to Lena-Greta repeat; commitments not proof. - Asked Greta exact R2 pair; asked Ines for new evidence. - R4 Nein did not resolve R2. - R5 Greta/Nadia not clean Nadia test because Greta controls first discard. - Voted Ja R3; scrutinize Rosa/Ines. - Greta common link in both Fascist governments; demanded exact R5 card flow; named Greta leading suspect. - Greta and Nadia accounts directly conflict; both must reconcile exact R5 cards. - At 2F, next government should exclude both Greta and Nadia; conflict clears neither. - Lena investigation cannot exonerate Greta or Nadia from R5 conflict.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R2 Chancellor and R5 President during both Fascist enactments; common link. R5 claims L/F/F conflicts with Nadia's F/F receipt; controlled first discard. - Nadia: R5 Chancellor during Fascist enactment; exact received pair/discard/enacted card unanswered. - Lena/Greta: R2 Fascist enactment; exact accounts unresolved; Greta's investigation of Lena is unverifiable. - Ines: R4 re-nominated Greta after R2 Fascist; rationale unanswered. - Rosa/Ines: R3 Liberal outcome; exact accounts unresolved. Open questions: - Greta: exact R2 pair/discard; exact R5 draw/discard/passed pair; reconcile L/F/F with Nadia F/F. - Nadia: exact R5 received pair, discarded card, enacted card; standard for evaluating Rosa's report. - Ines: concrete evidence for R4 Greta nomination. - Rosa/Ines: exact R3 draw/discard/pass; Boris/Rosa R1 reconciliation. Already said: - Fresh test preferable to Lena-Greta repeat; commitments not proof. - Asked Greta exact R2 pair; asked Ines for new evidence. - R4 Nein did not resolve R2. - R5 Greta/Nadia not clean Nadia test because Greta controls first discard. - Voted Ja R3; scrutinize Rosa/Ines. - Greta common link in both Fascist governments; demanded exact R5 card flow; named Greta leading suspect. - Greta and Nadia accounts directly conflict; both must reconcile exact R5 cards. - At 2F, next government should exclude both Greta and Nadia; conflict clears neither. - Lena investigation cannot exonerate Greta or Nadia from R5 conflict. - Greta's claimed Lena investigation is not independently verifiable and cannot be called confirmation.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R2 Chancellor and R5 President in both Fascist enactments; common link. R5 account conflicts with Nadia's F/F receipt; Greta controlled first discard. - Nadia: R5 Chancellor during Fascist enactment; exact flow unanswered. - Lena/Greta: R2 Fascist enactment; accounts unresolved. Greta's Lena investigation unverifiable. - Ines: R4 re-nominated Greta after R2 Fascist; rationale unanswered. - Rosa/Ines: R3 Liberal outcome; exact flow unresolved. Open questions: - Ines owes exact R3 pair, discard, passed card. - Greta owes exact R2 pair/discard and R5 draw/discard/passed pair; reconcile R5 conflict. - Nadia owes exact R5 received pair/discard/enacted card. - Ines owes evidence for R4 Greta nomination. - Rosa/Ines owe R3 details; Boris/Rosa R1 reconciliation. Already said: - Fresh test over Lena-Greta repeat; commitments not proof. - Asked Greta R2 cards; asked Ines evidence. - R4 Nein did not resolve R2. - R5 Greta/Nadia not clean Nadia test; Greta controlled first discard. - Voted Ja R3; scrutinize Rosa/Ines. - Greta common link in both Fascist governments; demanded exact R5 flow; leading suspect. - Greta/Nadia accounts directly conflict; both must reconcile exact R5 cards. - At 2F, next government should exclude Greta and Nadia; conflict clears neither. - Lena investigation cannot exonerate Greta/Nadia; not independently verifiable.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R2 Chancellor + R5 President for both Fascist enactments; R5 account conflicts with Nadia's F/F; controlled presidential discard. - Nadia: R5 Chancellor during Fascist enactment; exact flow incomplete. - Lena: publicly claimed Fascist by Greta's investigation; result unverified, but R2 government with Greta suspicious. - Ines: R4 re-nominated Greta after R2 Fascist; rationale unanswered. Open questions: - Ines: exact R3 pair/discard/passed card; rationale for R4 Greta nomination. - Greta: exact R2 pair/discard; exact R5 draw/discard/passed pair; reconcile Nadia's F/F. - Nadia: exact R5 received pair/discard/enacted card. - Rosa/Ines: R3 details; Boris/Rosa R1 reconciliation. Already said: - Exclude Greta/Nadia at 2F; conflict clears neither. - Greta common link; demanded exact R5 flow; leading suspect. - Greta/Nadia accounts mechanically conflict. - Lena check cannot exonerate Greta/Nadia; not independently verifiable. - Asked Greta R2 cards and Ines evidence; R4 Nein did not resolve R2. - Fresh test over Lena-Greta repeat; commitments not proof. - Voted Ja R3; scrutinize Rosa/Ines.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R2 Chancellor + R5 President for both Fascist enactments; R5 account conflicts with Nadia's F/F; controlled presidential discard. - Nadia: R5 Chancellor during Fascist enactment; exact flow incomplete. - Lena: Greta claims investigation found Fascist; result unverified, but R2 government with Greta suspicious. - Ines: R4 re-nominated Greta after R2 Fascist; rationale unanswered. Open questions: - Ines: exact R3 pair/discard/passed card; rationale for R4 Greta nomination. - Greta: exact R2 pair/discard; exact R5 draw/discard/passed pair; reconcile Nadia's F/F. - Nadia: exact R5 received pair/discard/enacted card. - Rosa/Ines: R3 details; Boris/Rosa R1 reconciliation. Already said: - Exclude Greta/Nadia at 2F; conflict clears neither. - Greta common link; demanded exact R5 flow; leading suspect. - Greta/Nadia accounts mechanically conflict. - Lena check cannot exonerate Greta/Nadia; not independently verifiable. - Asked Greta R2 cards and Ines evidence; R4 Nein did not resolve R2. - Fresh test over Lena-Greta repeat; commitments not proof. - Voted Ja R3; scrutinize Rosa/Ines.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R2 Chancellor + R5 President in both Fascist enactments; R5 account conflicts with Nadia's F/F; common link, controlled presidential discard. - Nadia: R5 Chancellor during Fascist enactment; exact flow incomplete; account conflicts with Greta's. - Lena: R2 government with Greta; Greta claims investigation found Fascist, unverified. - Ines: re-nominated Greta in R4 after R2 Fascist; rationale unanswered. - Rosa: R1 and R3 governments produced Liberal policies; strongest clean public record. Open questions: - Ines: exact R3 pair/discard/passed card; rationale for R4 Greta nomination. - Greta: exact R2 pair/discard; exact R5 draw/discard/passed pair; reconcile Nadia's F/F. - Nadia: exact R5 received pair/discard/enacted card. - Rosa/Boris: R1 details; Rosa/Ines: R3 details. Already said: - Exclude Greta/Nadia at 2F; conflict clears neither. - Greta common link; demanded exact R5 flow; leading suspect. - Greta/Nadia accounts mechanically conflict. - Lena check cannot exonerate Greta/Nadia; unverified. - Asked Greta R2 cards and Ines evidence; R4 Nein did not resolve R2. - Fresh test over Lena-Greta repeat; commitments not proof. - Voted Ja R3; scrutinize Rosa/Ines.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R2 Chancellor + R5 President in both Fascist enactments; common link; presidential control in R5. - Nadia: R5 Chancellor during Fascist enactment; now President; exact R5 flow unresolved; account conflicts with Greta's. - Lena: R2 government with Greta; Greta's claimed investigation unverified. - Ines: re-nominated Greta in R4 after R2 Fascist; rationale unanswered. - Rosa: R1 and R3 governments produced Liberal policies; strongest clean public record. Open questions: - Nadia: exact R5 received pair, discard, enacted card; why support current government. - Greta: exact R2 pair/discard and R5 draw/discard/passed pair; reconcile Nadia's F/F account. - Ines: exact R3 pair/discard/passed card; rationale for R4 Greta nomination. - Rosa/Boris: R1 details; Rosa/Ines: R3 details. Already said: - Exclude Greta/Nadia at 2F; conflict clears neither. - Greta is common link and leading suspect; demanded exact R5 flow. - Greta/Nadia accounts mechanically conflict. - Lena check cannot exonerate Greta/Nadia; unverified. - Asked Greta R2 cards and Ines evidence; R4 Nein did not resolve R2. - Prefer a fresh test over Lena-Greta repeat; commitments are not proof. - Voted Ja R3; scrutinize Rosa/Ines.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R2 Chancellor + R5 President in both Fascist enactments; R5 account (L/F/F, passed L/F) mechanically conflicts with Nadia's F/F claim. - Nadia: R5 Chancellor during Fascist enactment; F/F claim conflicts with Greta; pre-vote exact-card disclosure commitment incomplete. - Lena: Greta's investigation claim says Fascist; result privately unverifiable; R2 government with Greta. - Ines: R4 nominated Greta after R2 Fascist; rationale unanswered. - Rosa: R1/R3 governments produced Liberal policies; strongest clean record. Open questions: - Rosa: commit exact handling/disclosure if R6 receives F/F; Ines's exact R3 pair/discard. - Nadia: exact R5 received pair/discard/enacted card; reason for supporting current government. - Greta: exact R2 pair/discard; full R5 draw/discard/pass; reconcile Nadia's F/F. - Ines: rationale for R4 Greta nomination. - Boris: exact R1 draw/discard. Already said: - Exclude Greta/Nadia at 2F; conflict clears neither. - Greta common link/leading suspect; demanded exact R5 flow. - Greta/Nadia accounts mechanically conflict. - Lena check cannot exonerate Greta/Nadia; result unverified. - Asked Greta R2 cards and Ines evidence; R4 Nein did not resolve R2. - Prefer fresh test over Lena-Greta repeat; commitments not proof. - Voted Ja R3; scrutinize Rosa/Ines.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R2 Chancellor + R5 President in both Fascist enactments; R5 L/F/F -> claimed L/F pass conflicts with Nadia F/F. - Nadia: R5 Chancellor during Fascist enactment; F/F claim conflicts with Greta; incomplete pre-vote disclosure commitment. - Lena: Greta claims investigation found Fascist; result privately unverifiable; R2 government with Greta. - Ines: R4 nominated Greta after R2 Fascist; rationale unanswered. - Rosa: R1/R3 governments produced Liberal policies; strongest clean record. Open questions: - Rosa: commitment for L/F handling and exact disclosure; F/F handling/disclosure; Ines's exact R3 pair/discard. - Nadia: exact R5 pair/discard/enacted card; reason for supporting current government. - Greta: exact R2 pair/discard; full R5 draw/discard/pass; reconcile Nadia F/F. - Ines: rationale for R4 Greta nomination. - Boris: exact R1 draw/discard. Already said: - Exclude Greta/Nadia at 2F; conflict clears neither. - Greta common link/leading suspect; demanded exact R5 flow. - Greta/Nadia accounts mechanically conflict. - Lena check cannot exonerate Greta/Nadia; result unverified. - Asked Greta R2 cards and Ines evidence; R4 Nein did not resolve R2. - Prefer fresh test over Lena-Greta repeat; commitments not proof. - Voted Ja R3; scrutinize Rosa/Ines. - Asked Rosa whether she will discard Fascist and disclose if F/F.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R2 Chancellor + R5 President in both Fascist enactments; R5 claimed L/F/F -> L/F pass conflicts with Nadia F/F. - Nadia: R5 Chancellor during Fascist enactment; F/F claim conflicts with Greta; incomplete pre-vote disclosure. - Lena: Greta claims investigation found Fascist; privately unverifiable; R2 government with Greta. - Ines: R4 nominated Greta after R2 Fascist; rationale unanswered. - Rosa: R1/R3 governments produced Liberal policies; strongest clean record. Open questions: - Rosa: L/F and F/F handling/disclosure commitments; Ines exact R3 pair/discard. - Nadia: exact R5 pair/discard/enacted card; reason for current nomination. - Greta: exact R2 pair/discard; full R5 flow; reconcile Nadia F/F. - Ines: rationale for R4 Greta nomination. - Boris: exact R1 draw/discard. Already said: - Exclude Greta/Nadia at 2F; conflict clears neither. - Greta common link/leading suspect; demanded exact R5 flow. - Greta/Nadia accounts mechanically conflict. - Lena check cannot exonerate Greta/Nadia; result unverified. - Asked Greta R2 cards and Ines evidence; R4 Nein did not resolve R2. - Prefer fresh test over Lena-Greta repeat; commitments not proof. - Voted Ja R3; scrutinize Rosa/Ines. - Asked Rosa whether she will discard Fascist and disclose if F/F.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R2 Chancellor + R5 President in both Fascist enactments; R5 claimed L/F/F -> L/F pass conflicts with Nadia F/F. - Nadia: R5 Chancellor during Fascist enactment; F/F claim conflicts with Greta; incomplete pre-vote disclosure; exact flow still unanswered. - Lena: Greta claims investigation found Fascist; privately unverifiable; R2 government with Greta. - Ines: R4 nominated Greta after R2 Fascist; rationale unanswered. - Rosa: R1/R3 governments produced Liberal policies; strongest clean record, but commitments not proof. Open questions: - Rosa: L/F and F/F handling/disclosure commitments; no answer yet. - Nadia: exact R5 pair/discard/enacted card; reason for current nomination; unanswered. - Greta: exact R2 pair/discard; full R5 flow; reconcile Nadia F/F; unanswered. - Ines: rationale for R4 Greta nomination; unanswered. - Boris: exact R1 draw/discard; unanswered. Already said: - Exclude Greta/Nadia at 2F; conflict clears neither. - Greta common link/leading suspect; demanded exact R5 flow. - Greta/Nadia accounts mechanically conflict. - Lena check cannot exonerate Greta/Nadia; result unverified. - Asked Greta R2 cards and Ines evidence; R4 Nein did not resolve R2. - Prefer fresh test over Lena-Greta repeat; commitments not proof. - Voted Ja R3; scrutinize Rosa/Ines. - Asked Rosa whether she will discard Fascist and disclose if F/F. - Current: voting Nein because Nadia still owes exact R5 flow after Fascist enactment.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R2 Chancellor + R5 President in both Fascist enactments; R5 claimed L/F/F -> L/F pass conflicts with Nadia F/F. - Nadia: R5 Chancellor during Fascist enactment; F/F claim conflicts with Greta; incomplete pre-vote disclosure; now proposes Rosa despite unresolved audit. - Lena: Greta claims investigation found Fascist; privately unverifiable; R2 government with Greta. - Ines: R4 nominated Greta after R2 Fascist; rationale unanswered. - Rosa: R1/R3 governments produced Liberal policies; cleanest record, but commitments untested. Open questions: - Nadia: exact R5 presidential draw, discard, and enacted card; why current nomination; unanswered. - Greta: exact R2 pair/discard; full R5 flow; reconcile Nadia F/F; unanswered. - Ines: rationale for R4 Greta nomination; unanswered. - Boris: exact R1 draw/discard; unanswered. - Rosa: L/F and F/F handling/disclosure commitments; no answer yet. Already said: - Exclude Greta/Nadia at 2F; conflict clears neither. - Greta common link/leading suspect; demanded exact R5 flow. - Greta/Nadia accounts mechanically conflict. - Lena check cannot exonerate Greta/Nadia; result unverified. - Asked Greta R2 cards and Ines evidence; R4 Nein did not resolve R2. - Prefer fresh test over Lena-Greta repeat; commitments not proof. - Voted Ja R3; scrutinize Rosa/Ines. - Asked Rosa whether she will discard Fascist and disclose if F/F. - Voting Nein because Nadia still owes exact R5 flow after Fascist enactment.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R2 Chancellor + R5 President in both Fascist enactments; R5 account conflicts with Nadia’s F/F claim. - Nadia: R5 Chancellor during Fascist enactment; claims Greta passed F/F, discarded F; now nominates Rosa despite unresolved conflict. - Lena: Greta claims investigation found Fascist; privately unverifiable; R2 government with Greta. - Ines: R4 nominated Greta after R2 Fascist; rationale unanswered. - Rosa: R1/R3 governments produced Liberal policies; cleanest record, but current test commitment needed. Open questions unanswered: - Nadia: exact R5 flow and why nominate Rosa. - Greta: exact R2 cards/discard; full R5 flow; reconcile Nadia F/F. - Ines: rationale for R4 Greta nomination. - Boris: exact R1 draw/discard. - Rosa: will discard Fascist and disclose if F/F? Already said: - Exclude Greta/Nadia at 2F; conflict clears neither. - Greta common link/leading suspect; demanded exact R5 flow. - Greta/Nadia accounts mechanically conflict. - Lena check cannot exonerate Greta/Nadia; result unverified. - Asked Greta R2 cards and Ines evidence; R4 Nein did not resolve R2. - Prefer fresh test over Lena-Greta repeat; commitments not proof. - Voted Ja R3; scrutinize Rosa/Ines. - Asked Rosa whether she will discard Fascist and disclose if F/F. - Voted Nein because Nadia still owed exact R5 flow after Fascist enactment.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R2 Chancellor + R5 President in both Fascist enactments; R5 L/F claim incompatible with Nadia F/F claim. - Nadia: R5 Chancellor in Fascist enactment; claims Greta passed F/F; exact card identity unavailable; nominated Rosa despite unresolved conflict. - Lena: Greta claims R5 investigation found Fascist; R2 government with Greta; result privately unverifiable. - Ines: R4 nominated Greta after R2 Fascist; rationale unanswered. - Rosa: R1/R3 governments enacted Liberal; current clean test. Open questions: - Greta: exact R2 cards/discard; reconcile R5 account with Nadia F/F. - Ines: rationale for R4 Greta nomination. - Boris: exact R1 draw/discard. - Nadia: why nominate Rosa while her own R5 account remains disputed. Already said: - Greta common link/leading suspect; exclude Greta/Nadia; R5 flow contradiction; Lena check does not clear Greta/Nadia. - Requested Greta R2 account and Ines R4 rationale. - Supported fresh Nadia-Rosa test; asked Rosa commitments for L/F and F/F. - Voted Nein after R5 Fascist enactment due to unresolved Nadia account; supported Ja for current test.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R2 Chancellor + R5 President in both Fascist enactments; R5 L/F claim incompatible with Nadia F/F claim. - Nadia: R5 Chancellor in Fascist enactment; claims Greta passed F/F; exact card identity unavailable; nominated Rosa despite unresolved conflict. - Lena: Greta claims R5 investigation found Fascist; R2 government with Greta; result privately unverifiable. - Ines: R4 nominated Greta after R2 Fascist; rationale unanswered. - Rosa: R1/R3 governments enacted Liberal; current clean test. Open questions: - Greta: exact R2 cards/discard; reconcile R5 account with Nadia F/F. - Ines: rationale for R4 Greta nomination. - Boris: exact R1 draw/discard. - Nadia: future refusal of Chancellor nomination if current government produces Fascist; why nominate Rosa while own R5 account disputed. Already said: - Greta common link/leading suspect; exclude Greta/Nadia; R5 flow contradiction; Lena check does not clear Greta/Nadia. - Requested Greta R2 account and Ines R4 rationale. - Supported fresh Nadia-Rosa test; asked Rosa commitments for L/F and F/F. - Voted Nein after R5 Fascist enactment; supported Ja for current test.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R2 Chancellor + R5 President in both Fascist enactments; R5 L/F claim incompatible with Nadia F/F. - Nadia: R5 Chancellor in Fascist enactment; claims Greta passed F/F; unresolved exact flow; nominated Rosa despite dispute. - Lena: Greta claims investigation found Fascist; R2 government with Greta; publicly unverifiable claim. - Ines: R4 nominated Greta after R2 Fascist; rationale unanswered. - Rosa: R1/R3 governments enacted Liberal; current clean test. Open questions: - Greta: exact R2 cards/discard; reconcile R5 account with Nadia F/F. - Ines: rationale for R4 Greta nomination. - Boris: exact R1 draw/discard. - Nadia: future refusal of Chancellor nomination if current government produces Fascist. Already said: - Greta common link/leading suspect; exclude Greta/Nadia; R5 flow contradiction; Lena check does not clear Greta/Nadia. - Requested Greta R2 account and Ines R4 rationale. - Supported Nadia-Rosa test; asked Rosa L/F and F/F commitments. - Voted Nein after R5 Fascist; supported Ja current test. - Asked Nadia whether she will refuse next Chancellor nomination after a Fascist result.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R2 Chancellor + R5 President in both Fascist enactments; R5 L/F claim conflicts with Nadia's F/F account. - Nadia: R5 Chancellor in Fascist enactment; claims Greta passed F/F; flow unresolved; nominated Rosa despite dispute. - Lena: claims investigation found Greta Fascist; R2 government with Greta; unverifiable publicly. - Ines: nominated Greta in R4 after R2 Fascist; rationale unanswered. - Rosa: R1/R3 governments enacted Liberal; current clean test. Open questions: - Greta: exact R2 cards/discard; reconcile R5 account with Nadia. - Ines: rationale for R4 Greta nomination. - Boris: exact R1 draw/discard. - Nadia: whether she will refuse next Chancellor nomination after current Fascist result. Already said: - Greta common link/leading suspect; exclude Greta/Nadia. - R5 flow contradiction; Lena's check does not clear Greta/Nadia. - Requested Greta R2 account and Ines R4 rationale. - Supported Nadia-Rosa test; asked Rosa L/F and F/F commitments. - Voted Nein after R5 Fascist; supported Ja current test. - Asked Nadia about refusing next Chancellor nomination after a Fascist result.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R2 Chancellor + R5 President in both Fascist enactments; R5 L/F claim conflicts with Nadia’s F/F account. - Nadia: R5 Chancellor in Fascist enactment; calling current test “clean” omits her own involvement; flow unresolved; nominated Rosa despite dispute. - Lena: claims investigation found Greta Fascist; R2 government with Greta; unverifiable publicly. - Ines: nominated Greta in R4 after R2 Fascist; rationale unanswered. - Rosa: R1/R3 governments enacted Liberal; current clean test. Open questions: - Greta: exact R2 cards/discard; reconcile R5 account with Nadia. - Ines: rationale for R4 Greta nomination. - Boris: exact R1 draw/discard. - Nadia: whether she will refuse next Chancellor nomination after a Fascist result. - Rosa: commitment to reject future Lena/Greta governments if this test fails. Already said: - Greta common link/leading suspect; exclude Greta/Nadia. - R5 flow contradiction; Lena’s check does not clear Greta/Nadia. - Requested Greta R2 account and Ines R4 rationale. - Supported Nadia-Rosa test; asked Rosa L/F and F/F commitments. - Voted Nein after R5 Fascist; supported Ja current test. - Asked Nadia about refusing next Chancellor nomination after a Fascist result.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R2 Chancellor + R5 President in both Fascist enactments; R5 L/F claim conflicts with Nadia F/F. - Nadia: R5 Chancellor in Fascist enactment; account unresolved; current test omits her involvement. - Lena: claimed investigation found Greta Fascist; R2 government with Greta; result not publicly verifiable. - Ines: nominated Greta R4 after R2 Fascist; rationale unanswered. - Rosa: R1/R3 Liberal governments; current test. Open questions: - Greta: exact R2 cards/discard; reconcile R5 account with Nadia. - Ines: rationale for R4 Greta nomination. - Boris: exact R1 draw/discard. - Nadia: refuse next Chancellor nomination after Fascist result? - Rosa: reject future Lena/Greta governments if current test fails. Already said: - Greta common link/leading suspect; exclude Greta/Nadia. - R5 flow contradiction; Lena check does not clear Greta/Nadia. - Requested Greta R2 account and Ines R4 rationale. - Supported Nadia-Rosa test; requested Rosa L/F and F/F commitments. - Voted Nein after R5 Fascist; supported current Ja test. - Asked Nadia about refusing next nomination after Fascist result.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R2 Chancellor + R5 President in both Fascist enactments; R5 L/F claim conflicts with Nadia F/F. - Nadia: R5 Chancellor in Fascist enactment; account unresolved; current test omits her involvement. - Lena: Greta claims investigation found her Fascist; R2 government with Greta; result publicly unverifiable. - Ines: nominated Greta R4 after R2 Fascist; rationale unanswered. - Rosa: R1/R3 Liberal governments; current test. Open questions: - Greta: exact R2 cards/discard; reconcile R5 account with Nadia. - Ines: rationale for R4 Greta nomination. - Boris: exact R1 draw/discard. - Nadia: refuse next Chancellor nomination after Fascist result? - Rosa: reject future Lena/Greta governments if current test fails. Already said: - Greta common link/leading suspect; exclude Greta/Nadia. - R5 flow contradiction; Lena check does not clear Greta/Nadia. - Requested Greta R2 account and Ines R4 rationale. - Supported Nadia-Rosa test; requested Rosa L/F and F/F commitments. - Voted Nein after R5 Fascist; supported current Ja test. - Asked Nadia about refusing next nomination after Fascist result.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R2 Chancellor + R5 President in both Fascist enactments; R5 L/F claim conflicts with Nadia F/F. - Nadia: R5 Chancellor in Fascist enactment; account unresolved; current test omits her direct card handling. - Lena: Greta claims investigation found her Fascist; R2 government with Greta; result publicly unverifiable. - Ines: nominated Greta R4 after R2 Fascist; rationale unanswered. - Rosa: R1/R3 Liberal governments; current clean test. Open questions: - Greta: exact R2 cards/discard; reconcile R5 account with Nadia. - Ines: rationale for R4 Greta nomination. - Boris: exact R1 draw/discard. - Nadia: refuse next Chancellor nomination after Fascist result? - Rosa: reject future Lena/Greta governments if current test fails. Already said: - Greta common link/leading suspect; exclude Greta/Nadia. - R5 flow contradiction; Lena check does not clear Greta/Nadia. - Requested Greta R2 account and Ines R4 rationale. - Supported Nadia-Rosa test; requested Rosa L/F and F/F commitments. - Voted Nein after R5 Fascist; supported current Ja test. - Asked Nadia about refusing next nomination after Fascist result.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R2 Chancellor + R5 President in both earlier Fascist enactments; R5 account conflicts with Nadia F/F. - Nadia: R5 Chancellor and R6 President in Fascist enactments; R6 government with Rosa produced Fascist policy. - Rosa: R6 Chancellor produced Fascist policy, undermining prior clean R1/R3 record. - Lena: Greta claims investigation found her Fascist; R2 government with Greta; unverifiable. - Ines: nominated Greta R4 after R2 Fascist; rationale unanswered. Open questions: - Greta: exact R2 cards/discard; reconcile R5 account with Nadia. - Ines: rationale for R4 Greta nomination. - Boris: exact R1 draw/discard. - Nadia: refuse next Chancellor nomination after Fascist result? - Rosa: reject future Lena/Greta governments if current test fails. Already said: - Greta common link/leading suspect; exclude Greta/Nadia. - R5 flow contradiction; Lena check does not clear Greta/Nadia. - Requested Greta R2 account and Ines R4 rationale. - Supported Nadia-Rosa test; requested Rosa L/F and F/F commitments. - Voted Nein after R5 Fascist; supported current Ja test. - Asked Nadia about refusing next nomination after Fascist result. - Current Nadia-Rosa test failed: R6 Fascist policy; both must be rejected next.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R2 Chancellor + R5 President in Fascist enactments; R5 account conflicts with Nadia F/F. - Nadia: R5 Chancellor + R6 President in Fascist enactments; selected Rosa despite claimed clean test; both R5/R6 Fascist outcomes. - Rosa: R6 Chancellor produced 3rd Fascist; prior clean R1/R3 record no longer sufficient. - Lena: Greta claims investigation found Fascist; R2 government with Greta; unverifiable. - Ines: nominated Greta R4 after R2 Fascist; rationale unanswered. Open questions: - Greta owes exact R2 cards/discard; reconcile R5 account with Nadia. - Ines owes rationale for R4 Greta nomination. - Boris owes exact R1 draw/discard. - Nadia owes whether she will refuse next Chancellor nomination after Fascist result. - Rosa owes exact R6 draw/discard/passed pair and commitment to reject Lena/Greta governments. Already said: - Greta common link/leading suspect; exclude Greta/Nadia. - R5 flow contradiction; Lena check does not clear Greta/Nadia. - Requested Greta R2 account and Ines R4 rationale. - Supported Nadia-Rosa test; requested Rosa L/F and F/F commitments. - Voted Nein after R5 Fascist; supported R6 test. - Asked Nadia about refusing next nomination after Fascist result. - R6 Fascist result: Nadia-Rosa joint exclusion; will vote Nein on either.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R2 Chancellor + R5 President in Fascist enactments; R5 account conflicts with Nadia's account; repeated government link. - Nadia: R5 Chancellor + R6 President in Fascist enactments; selected Rosa; both outcomes Fascist. - Rosa: R6 Chancellor produced 3rd Fascist; R1/R3 clean record no longer sufficient. - Lena: R2 government with Greta; Greta claims Lena investigated her as Fascist, unverifiable. - Ines: nominated Greta R4 after R2 Fascist; rationale unanswered. Open questions: - Greta owes exact R2 cards/discard; reconcile R5 account with Nadia. - Ines owes rationale for R4 Greta nomination. - Boris owes exact R1 draw/discard. - Nadia owes whether she will refuse next Chancellor nomination after Fascist result. - Rosa owes exact R6 draw/discard/passed pair and commitment to reject Lena/Greta governments. Already said: - Greta common link/leading suspect; exclude Greta/Nadia. - R5 flow contradiction; Lena check does not clear Greta/Nadia. - Requested Greta R2 account and Ines R4 rationale. - Supported Nadia-Rosa test; requested Rosa L/F and F/F commitments. - Voted Nein after R5 Fascist; supported R6 test. - Asked Nadia about refusing next nomination after Fascist result. - R6 Fascist result: Nadia-Rosa joint exclusion; vote Nein on either. - New: with 3 Fascist policies enacted, Hitler-election danger is live; next government must exclude Nadia, Rosa, and Greta unless accounts are resolved.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R2 Chancellor + R5 President in Fascist enactments; R5 account conflicts with Nadia; repeated government link. - Nadia: R5 Chancellor + R6 President; selected Rosa; both outcomes Fascist; must disclose R6 draw/discard. - Rosa: R6 Chancellor produced 3rd Fascist; R1/R3 clean record insufficient; questioning Nadia does not exonerate her. - Lena: R2 government with Greta; Greta claims Lena investigated her Fascist, unverifiable. - Ines: nominated Greta R4 after R2 Fascist; rationale unanswered. Open questions: - Greta: exact R2 cards/discard; reconcile R5 account with Nadia. - Ines: rationale for R4 Greta nomination. - Boris: exact R1 draw/discard. - Nadia: whether refusing next Chancellor nomination after Fascist result; exact R6 draw/discard. - Rosa: exact R6 draw/discard/passed pair; commitment to reject Lena/Greta governments. Already said: - Greta common link/leading suspect; exclude Greta/Nadia. - R5 flow contradiction; Lena check does not clear Greta/Nadia. - Requested Greta R2 account and Ines R4 rationale. - Supported Nadia-Rosa test; requested Rosa L/F and F/F commitments. - Voted Nein after R5 Fascist; supported R6 test. - Asked Nadia about refusing next Chancellor nomination after Fascist result. - R6 Fascist result: Nadia-Rosa joint exclusion; vote Nein on either. - 3 Fascist policies: Hitler-election danger live; next government exclude Nadia, Rosa, Greta unless accounts resolved. - New: Rosa’s scrutiny of Nadia is useful evidence-gathering, not an innocence claim; both must answer exact R6 hand flow before any trust.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R2 Chancellor + R5 President in Fascist enactments; R5 account conflict with Nadia; repeated government link. - Nadia: R5 Chancellor + R6 President; selected Rosa; both outcomes Fascist; owes exact R6 draw/discard. - Rosa: R6 Chancellor produced 3rd Fascist; R1/R3 clean record insufficient; owes exact R6 flow. - Lena: R2 government with Greta; Greta claims Lena investigated her Fascist, unverifiable. - Ines: nominated Greta R4 after R2 Fascist; rationale unanswered. Open questions: - Greta: exact R2 cards/discard; reconcile R5 account with Nadia. - Ines: rationale for R4 Greta nomination. - Boris: exact R1 draw/discard. - Nadia: exact R6 draw/discard; whether refusing next Chancellor after Fascist result. - Rosa: exact R6 draw/discard/passed pair; reject Lena/Greta governments? Already said: - Greta common link/leading suspect; exclude Greta/Nadia. - R5 flow contradiction; Lena check does not clear Greta/Nadia. - Requested Greta R2 account and Ines R4 rationale. - Supported Nadia-Rosa test; requested Rosa L/F and F/F commitments. - Voted Nein after R5 Fascist; supported R6 test. - Asked Nadia about refusing next Chancellor after Fascist result. - R6 Fascist result: Nadia-Rosa joint exclusion; vote Nein on either. - 3 Fascist policies: Hitler-election danger live; next government exclude Nadia, Rosa, Greta unless accounts resolved. - Rosa scrutiny of Nadia is evidence-gathering, not innocence; both must answer R6 hand flow. New: special election should be used to break recent Fascist chain.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R2 Chancellor + R5 President in Fascist enactments; R5 account conflict with Nadia; repeated government link. - Nadia: R5 Chancellor + R6 President; selected Rosa; both outcomes Fascist; owes exact R6 draw/discard. - Rosa: R6 Chancellor produced 3rd Fascist; R1/R3 clean record insufficient; owes exact R6 flow. - Lena: R2 government with Greta; Greta claims Lena investigated her Fascist, unverifiable. - Ines: nominated Greta R4 after R2 Fascist; rationale unanswered. Open questions: - Boris: exact R1 draw/discard. - Greta: exact R2 cards/discard; reconcile R5 account with Nadia. - Nadia: exact R6 draw/discard; whether refusing next Chancellor after Fascist result. - Rosa: exact R6 draw/discard/passed pair; reject Lena/Greta governments? - Ines: rationale for R4 Greta nomination. Already said: - Greta common link/leading suspect; exclude Greta/Nadia. - R5 flow contradiction; Lena check does not clear Greta/Nadia. - Requested Greta R2 account and Ines R4 rationale. - Supported Nadia-Rosa test; requested Rosa L/F and F/F commitments. - Voted Nein after R5 Fascist; supported R6 test. - Asked Nadia about refusing next Chancellor after Fascist result. - R6 Fascist result: Nadia-Rosa joint exclusion; vote Nein on either. - 3 Fascist policies: Hitler-election danger live; next government exclude Nadia, Rosa, Greta unless accounts resolved. - Rosa scrutiny of Nadia is evidence-gathering, not innocence; both must answer R6 hand flow. - Special election should break recent Fascist chain; Boris only if exact R1 account is given.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R2 Chancellor + R5 President in Fascist enactments; R5 account conflict with Nadia; repeated government link. - Nadia: R5 Chancellor + R6 President; selected Rosa; both outcomes Fascist; owes exact R6 draw/discard. - Rosa: R6 Chancellor produced 3rd Fascist; R1/R3 clean record insufficient; owes exact R6 flow. - Lena: R2 government with Greta; Greta claims Lena investigated her Fascist, unverifiable. - Ines: nominated Greta R4 after R2 Fascist; rationale unanswered. Open questions: - Boris: exact R1 draw/discard. - Greta: exact R2 cards/discard; reconcile R5 account with Nadia. - Nadia: exact R6 draw/discard; whether refusing next Chancellor after Fascist result. - Rosa: exact R6 draw/discard/passed pair; reject Lena/Greta governments? - Ines: rationale for R4 Greta nomination. Already said: - Greta common link/leading suspect; exclude Greta/Nadia. - R5 flow contradiction; Lena check does not clear Greta/Nadia. - Requested Greta R2 account and Ines R4 rationale. - Supported Nadia-Rosa test; requested Rosa L/F and F/F commitments. - Voted Nein after R5 Fascist; supported R6 test. - Asked Nadia about refusing next Chancellor after Fascist result. - R6 Fascist result: Nadia-Rosa joint exclusion; vote Nein on either. - 3 Fascist policies: Hitler-election danger live; next government exclude Nadia, Rosa, Greta unless accounts resolved. - Rosa scrutiny of Nadia is evidence-gathering, not innocence; both must answer R6 hand flow. - Special election should break recent Fascist chain; Boris only if exact R1 account is given. - New: accept Boris's special election; commit to nominating Ines.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R2 Chancellor + R5 President in Fascist enactments; R5 account conflicts with Nadia; repeated government link. - Nadia: R5 Chancellor + R6 President; selected Rosa; both outcomes Fascist; owes exact R6 draw/discard. - Rosa: R6 Chancellor produced 3rd Fascist; R1 claim L/F conflicts with Boris's new L/L pass; owes exact R6 flow. - Lena: R2 government with Greta; Greta claims investigation found Fascist, unverifiable. - Ines: nominated Greta R4 after R2 Fascist; rationale unanswered. - Boris: R1 account now L/L/F, discarded F, passed L/L; conflicts with Rosa's R1 L/F claim. Open questions: - Greta: exact R2 cards/discard; reconcile R5 account with Nadia. - Nadia: exact R6 draw/discard; whether refusing next Chancellor after Fascist result. - Rosa: exact R6 draw/discard/passed pair; reject Lena/Greta governments; explain R1 L/F versus Boris L/L. - Ines: rationale for R4 Greta nomination. Already said: - Greta common link/leading suspect; exclude Greta/Nadia. - R5 flow contradiction; Lena check does not clear Greta/Nadia. - Requested Greta R2 account and Ines R4 rationale. - Supported Nadia-Rosa test; requested Rosa L/F and F/F commitments. - Voted Nein after R5 Fascist; supported R6 test. - Asked Nadia about refusing next Chancellor after Fascist result. - R6 Fascist: Nadia-Rosa joint exclusion; vote Nein on either. - 3 Fascist policies: Hitler-election danger; exclude Nadia, Rosa, Greta unless resolved. - Rosa scrutiny of Nadia is evidence-gathering, not innocence; both answer R6 flow. - Special election should break recent Fascist chain; accept Boris if account given. - Commit to nominate Ines.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R2 Chancellor + R5 President in Fascist enactments; R5 account conflicts with Nadia; repeated government link. - Nadia: R5 Chancellor + R6 President; selected Rosa; both outcomes Fascist; owes exact R6 draw/discard. - Rosa: R6 Chancellor produced 3rd Fascist; R1 claim L/F conflicts with Boris's new L/L pass; owes exact R6 flow. - Lena: R2 government with Greta; Greta claims investigation found Fascist, unverifiable. - Ines: nominated Greta R4 after R2 Fascist; rationale unanswered. - Boris: R1 account now L/L/F, discarded F, passed L/L; conflicts with Rosa's R1 L/F claim. Open questions: - Greta: exact R2 cards/discard; reconcile R5 account with Nadia. - Nadia: exact R6 draw/discard; refusal next Chancellor after Fascist result. - Rosa: exact R6 draw/discard/passed pair; R1 L/F versus Boris L/L; reject Lena/Greta governments. - Ines: rationale for R4 Greta nomination. Already said: - Greta common link/leading suspect; exclude Greta/Nadia. - R5 flow contradiction; Lena check does not clear Greta/Nadia. - Requested Greta R2 account and Ines R4 rationale. - Supported Nadia-Rosa test; requested Rosa L/F and F/F commitments. - Voted Nein after R5 Fascist; supported R6 test. - Asked Nadia about refusing next Chancellor after Fascist result. - R6 Fascist: Nadia-Rosa joint exclusion; vote Nein on either. - 3 Fascist policies: Hitler-election danger; exclude Nadia, Rosa, Greta unless resolved. - Rosa scrutiny of Nadia is evidence-gathering, not innocence; both answer R6 flow. - Special election should break recent Fascist chain; accept Boris if account given. - Commit to nominate Ines.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R2 Chancellor + R5 President in Fascist enactments; R5 account conflicts with Nadia; repeated government link. - Nadia: R5 Chancellor + R6 President; selected Rosa; both outcomes Fascist; owes exact R6 draw/discard. - Rosa: R6 Chancellor produced 3rd Fascist; R1 claim L/F conflicts with Boris's L/L pass; owes exact R6 flow. - Lena: R2 government with Greta; Greta claims investigation found Fascist, unverifiable. - Ines: nominated Greta R4 after R2 Fascist; rationale unanswered. - Boris: R1 account now L/L/F, discarded F, passed L/L; conflicts with Rosa's R1 L/F claim. Open questions: - Greta: exact R2 cards/discard; reconcile R5 account with Nadia. - Nadia: exact R6 draw/discard; refusal next Chancellor after Fascist result. - Rosa: exact R6 draw/discard/passed pair; R1 L/F versus Boris L/L; reject Lena/Greta governments. - Ines: rationale for R4 Greta nomination. Already said: - Greta common link/leading suspect; exclude Greta/Nadia. - R5 flow contradiction; Lena check does not clear Greta/Nadia. - Requested Greta R2 account and Ines R4 rationale. - Supported Nadia-Rosa test; requested Rosa L/F and F/F commitments. - Voted Nein after R5 Fascist; supported R6 test. - Asked Nadia about refusing next Chancellor after Fascist result. - R6 Fascist: Nadia-Rosa joint exclusion; vote Nein on either. - 3 Fascist policies: Hitler-election danger; exclude Nadia, Rosa, Greta unless resolved. - Rosa scrutiny of Nadia is evidence-gathering, not innocence; both answer R6 flow. - Special election should break recent Fascist chain; accept Boris if account given. - Commit to nominate Ines.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R2 Chancellor + R5 President in Fascist enactments; repeated government link; R5 account conflict with Nadia. - Nadia: R5 Chancellor + R6 President; selected Rosa; both outcomes Fascist; owes exact R6 flow; refused next Chancellor. - Rosa: R6 Chancellor produced 3rd Fascist; R1 L/F claim conflicts with Boris's L/L pass; owes exact R6 flow. - Lena: R2 government with Greta; Greta's claimed investigation unverifiable. - Ines: nominated Greta R4 after R2 Fascist; rationale unanswered. - Boris: R1 L/L/F account conflicts with Rosa's R1 L/F claim. Open questions: - Greta: exact R2 cards/discard; reconcile R5 account with Nadia. - Nadia: exact R6 draw/discard; refusal of next Chancellor after Fascist result. - Rosa: exact R6 draw/discard/passed pair; reconcile R1 claim; reject Lena/Greta governments. - Ines: rationale for R4 Greta nomination; exact cards/discard if elected now. Already said: - Greta common link/leading suspect; exclude Greta/Nadia. - R5 flow contradiction; Lena check does not clear Greta/Nadia. - Requested Greta R2 account and Ines R4 rationale. - Supported Nadia-Rosa test; requested Rosa L/F and F/F commitments. - Voted Nein after R5 Fascist; supported R6 test. - Asked Nadia about refusing next Chancellor after Fascist result. - R6 Fascist: Nadia-Rosa joint exclusion; vote Nein on either. - 3 Fascist policies: Hitler-election danger; exclude Nadia, Rosa, Greta unless resolved. - Rosa scrutiny of Nadia is evidence-gathering, not innocence; both answer R6 flow. - Special election should break recent Fascist chain; accept Boris if account given. - Commit to nominate Ines.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R2 Chancellor + R5 President in Fascist enactments; repeated government link; R5 account conflict with Nadia. - Nadia: R5 Chancellor + R6 President; selected Rosa; both outcomes Fascist; owes exact R6 flow; refused next Chancellor. - Rosa: R6 Chancellor produced 3rd Fascist; R1 L/F claim conflicts with Boris's R1 L/L/F account; owes exact R6 flow. - Lena: R2 government with Greta; Greta's claimed investigation unverifiable. - Ines: nominated Greta R4 after R2 Fascist; rationale unanswered; R3 Chancellor in Liberal enactment. - Boris: R1 L/L/F account conflicts with Rosa's R1 L/F claim. Open questions: - Greta: exact R2 cards/discard; reconcile R5 account with Nadia. - Nadia: exact R6 draw/discard; refusal of next Chancellor after Fascist result. - Rosa: exact R6 draw/discard/passed pair; reconcile R1 claim; reject Lena/Greta governments. - Ines: rationale for R4 Greta nomination; exact cards/discard if elected now. - Boris: reconcile R1 policy-flow account. Already said: - Greta common link/leading suspect; exclude Greta/Nadia. - R5 flow contradiction; Lena check does not clear Greta/Nadia. - Requested Greta R2 account and Ines R4 rationale. - Supported Nadia-Rosa test; requested Rosa L/F and F/F commitments. - Voted Nein after R5 Fascist; supported R6 test. - Asked Nadia about refusing next Chancellor after Fascist result. - R6 Fascist: Nadia-Rosa joint exclusion; vote Nein on either. - 3 Fascist policies: Hitler-election danger; exclude Nadia, Rosa, Greta unless resolved. - Rosa scrutiny of Nadia is evidence-gathering, not innocence; both answer R6 flow. - Special election should break recent Fascist chain; accept Boris if account given. - Commit to nominate Ines.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R2 Chancellor + R5 President in Fascist enactments; repeated government link; R5 account conflict with Nadia. - Nadia: R5 Chancellor + R6 President; selected Rosa; both outcomes Fascist; owes exact R6 flow; refused next Chancellor. - Rosa: R6 Chancellor produced 3rd Fascist; R1 L/F claim conflicts with Boris's R1 L/L/F account; owes exact R6 flow. - Lena: R2 government with Greta; Greta investigation unverifiable. - Ines: R4 nominated Greta after R2 Fascist; rationale unanswered; R3 Chancellor in Liberal enactment. - Boris: R1 L/L/F account conflicts with Rosa's R1 L/F claim. Open questions: - Greta: exact R2 cards/discard; reconcile R5 account with Nadia. - Nadia: exact R6 draw/discard; refusal of next Chancellor after Fascist. - Rosa: exact R6 draw/discard/passed pair; reconcile R1 claim; reject Lena/Greta governments. - Ines: rationale for R4 Greta nomination; exact cards/discard if elected now. - Boris: reconcile R1 policy-flow account. Already said: - Greta common link/leading suspect; exclude Greta/Nadia. - R5 flow contradiction; Lena check does not clear Greta/Nadia. - Requested Greta R2 account and Ines R4 rationale. - Supported Nadia-Rosa test; requested Rosa L/F and F/F commitments. - Voted Nein after R5 Fascist; supported R6 test. - Asked Nadia about refusing next Chancellor after Fascist result. - R6 Fascist: Nadia-Rosa joint exclusion; vote Nein on either. - 3 Fascist policies: Hitler-election danger; exclude Nadia, Rosa, Greta unless resolved. - Rosa scrutiny of Nadia is evidence-gathering, not innocence; both answer R6 flow. - Special election should break recent Fascist chain; accept Boris if account given. - Commit to nominate Ines.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R2 Chancellor + R5 President in Fascist enactments; repeated link; R5 account conflict with Nadia. - Nadia: R5 Chancellor + R6 President; selected Rosa; both outcomes Fascist; owes exact R6 flow; refused next Chancellor. - Rosa: R6 Chancellor produced 3rd Fascist; R1 L/F claim conflicts with Boris R1 L/L/F account; owes exact R6 flow. - Lena: R2 government with Greta; investigation claim unverifiable. - Ines: R3 Chancellor in Liberal enactment; R4 nominated Greta after R2 Fascist, rationale unanswered. - Boris: R1 L/L/F account conflicts with Rosa R1 L/F claim. Open questions: - Greta: exact R2 cards/discard; reconcile R5 account with Nadia. - Nadia: exact R6 draw/discard; refusal of next Chancellor after Fascist. - Rosa: exact R6 draw/discard/passed pair; reconcile R1 claim; reject Lena/Greta governments. - Ines: rationale for R4 Greta nomination; exact cards/discard if elected now. - Boris: reconcile R1 policy-flow account. Already said: - Greta common link/leading suspect; exclude Greta/Nadia. - R5 flow contradiction; Lena check does not clear Greta/Nadia. - Requested Greta R2 account and Ines R4 rationale. - Supported Nadia-Rosa test; requested Rosa L/F and F/F commitments. - Voted Nein after R5 Fascist; supported R6 test. - Asked Nadia about refusing next Chancellor after Fascist result. - R6 Fascist: Nadia-Rosa joint exclusion; vote Nein on either. - 3 Fascist: Hitler-election danger; exclude Nadia, Rosa, Greta unless resolved. - Rosa scrutiny of Nadia is evidence-gathering, not innocence; both answer R6 flow. - Special election should break recent Fascist chain; accept Boris if account given. - Commit to nominate Ines. - Current: demand Boris/Ines exact accounts before voting; Ines is less contaminated by outcomes than recent Fascist-linked players.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R2 Chancellor + R5 President in Fascist enactments; repeated link; R5 account conflict with Nadia. - Nadia: R5 Chancellor + R6 President; selected Rosa; both outcomes Fascist; exact R6 flow unresolved; refused next Chancellor. - Rosa: R6 Chancellor produced 3rd Fascist; R1 L/F claim conflicts with Boris R1 L/L/F account; exact R6 flow unresolved. - Lena: R2 government with Greta; investigation claim unverifiable. - Ines: R3 Chancellor in Liberal enactment; R4 nominated Greta after R2 Fascist, rationale unanswered. - Boris: R1 L/L/F account conflicts with Rosa R1 L/F claim. Open questions: - Greta: exact R2 cards/discard; reconcile R5 account with Nadia. - Nadia: exact R6 draw/discard; refusal of next Chancellor after Fascist. - Rosa: exact R6 draw/discard/passed pair; reconcile R1 claim; reject Lena/Greta governments. - Ines: rationale for R4 Greta nomination; exact cards/discard if elected now. - Boris: reconcile R1 policy-flow account; exact current draw/discard after enactment. Already said: - Greta common link/leading suspect; exclude Greta/Nadia. - R5 flow contradiction; Lena check does not clear Greta/Nadia. - Requested Greta R2 account and Ines R4 rationale. - Supported Nadia-Rosa test; requested Rosa L/F and F/F commitments. - Voted Nein after R5 Fascist; supported R6 test. - Asked Nadia about refusing next Chancellor after Fascist result. - R6 Fascist: Nadia-Rosa joint exclusion; vote Nein on either. - 3 Fascist: Hitler-election danger; exclude Nadia, Rosa, Greta unless resolved. - Rosa scrutiny of Nadia is evidence-gathering, not innocence; both answer R6 flow. - Special election should break recent Fascist chain; accept Boris if account given. - Commit to nominate Ines. - Current: demand Boris/Ines exact accounts before voting; Ines less contaminated by outcomes than recent Fascist-linked players.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R2 Chancellor + R5 President in Fascist enactments; R5 account conflict with Nadia. - Nadia: R5 Chancellor + R6 President; selected Rosa; R5/R6 chain produced Fascists; R6 F/F/F claim unresolved; refused next Chancellor. - Rosa: R6 Chancellor produced 3rd Fascist; R1 L/F claim conflicts with Boris L/L/F; R6 flow unresolved. - Lena: R2 government with Greta; confirmed Fascist; endorsing current Boris–Ines government. - Boris: R1 L/L/F account conflicts with Rosa L/F; current policy flow unknown. - Ines: R3 Chancellor in Liberal enactment; R4 nominated Greta; Round 3 receipt/discard unaudited. Open questions: - Greta: R2 cards/discard; reconcile R5 with Nadia. - Nadia: exact R6 draw/discard; next-Chancellor refusal. - Rosa: exact R6 draw/discard/passed pair; reconcile R1 claim; exclude Lena/Greta. - Ines: R3 receipt/discard; rationale for R4 Greta nomination. - Boris: reconcile R1 flow; current draw/discard after enactment. Already said: - Greta/Nadia/Rosa joint exclusion after repeated Fascist governments. - Lena investigation unverifiable; Lena confirmed Fascist. - Rosa R1 contradiction and R6 audit demanded. - Supported R6 test; accepted special election and committed to nominate Ines. - Current government needs exact post-enactment disclosures; Ines less outcome-contaminated.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R2 Chancellor + R5 President in Fascist enactments; R5 account conflict with Nadia. - Nadia: R5 Chancellor + R6 President; selected Rosa; R5/R6 chain produced Fascists; R6 F/F/F claim unresolved; refused next Chancellor. - Rosa: R6 Chancellor produced 3rd Fascist; R1 L/F conflicts with Boris L/L/F; R6 flow unresolved. - Lena: confirmed Fascist; R2 government with Greta; endorses Boris–Ines. - Boris: R1 L/L/F conflicts with Rosa L/F; current draw/discard unknown. - Ines: R3 Chancellor in Liberal enactment; R4 nominated Greta; R3 receipt/discard unaudited. Open: Greta R2 cards/R5 reconciliation; Nadia R6 exact draw/discard and refusal; Rosa R6 flow and R1 reconciliation; Ines R3 flow and R4 Greta rationale; Boris R1 reconciliation/current flow. Already said: exclude Greta/Nadia/Rosa; Lena confirmed Fascist; demanded Rosa/R6 audit; supported R6 test; accepted special election; promised Ines nomination; current test needs disclosures; Boris–Rosa contradiction; now reject Boris–Ines due to contradiction, unaudited Ines, and live Hitler risk.

Suspects/evidence: - Greta: R2 Chancellor + R5 President in Fascist enactments; R5 account conflict with Nadia. - Nadia: R5 Chancellor + R6 President; selected Rosa; R5/R6 chain produced Fascists; R6 F/F/F claim unresolved; refused next Chancellor. - Rosa: R6 Chancellor produced 3rd Fascist; R1 L/F conflicts with Boris L/L/F; R6 flow unresolved. - Lena: confirmed Fascist; R2 government with Greta; endorses Boris–Ines. - Boris: R1 L/L/F conflicts with Rosa L/F; R7 President with Ines produced Fascist; current draw/discard unknown. - Ines: R3 Chancellor in Liberal enactment; R4 nominated Greta; R7 Chancellor in Fascist enactment; R3 receipt/discard unaudited. Open questions: Greta owes R2 cards/R5 reconciliation; Nadia owes R6 exact draw/discard and refusal rationale; Rosa owes R6 flow and R1 reconciliation; Ines owes R3 flow and R4 Greta rationale; Boris owes R1 reconciliation and R7 exact flow. Already said: exclude Greta/Nadia/Rosa; Lena confirmed Fascist; demanded Rosa/R6 audit; supported R6 test; accepted special election; promised Ines nomination; current test needs disclosures; Boris–Rosa contradiction; reject Boris–Ines due to contradiction, unaudited Ines, and live Hitler risk.

Suspects/evidence: - Lena: confirmed Fascist; R2 government with Greta; endorses Boris–Ines. - Greta: R2 Chancellor + R5 President in Fascist enactments; R5 account conflict with Nadia. - Nadia: R5 Chancellor + R6 President; R5/R6 chain produced Fascists; R6 flow unresolved; refused next Chancellor. - Rosa: R6 Chancellor produced 3rd Fascist; R1 L/F conflicts with Boris L/L/F; R6 flow unresolved. - Boris: R1 L/L/F conflicts with Rosa L/F; R7 President with Ines produced 4th Fascist; claims passed L/F, but self-serving. - Ines: R3 Chancellor in Liberal enactment; R7 Chancellor in Fascist enactment; Boris claims she discarded L from L/F; exact account unanswered. Open questions: - Ines owes exact R7 pair and discarded card; explanation for discarding Liberal. - Boris owes exact R7 flow, plus R1 reconciliation. - Greta owes R2 cards/R5 reconciliation. - Nadia owes R6 exact draw/discard and refusal rationale. - Rosa owes R6 flow and R1 reconciliation. - Ines owes R3 flow and R4 Greta rationale. Already said: - Exclude Greta/Nadia/Rosa; Lena confirmed Fascist. - Demanded Rosa/R6 audit; supported R6 test; accepted special election. - Promised Ines nomination; current test needs disclosures. - Boris–Rosa contradiction; reject Boris–Ines due to contradiction, unaudited Ines, and live Hitler risk. - Public point now: at 4 Fascists, Boris/Ines require exact R7 audit before consideration.

Suspects/evidence: - Lena: confirmed Fascist; R2 with Greta; endorses Boris–Ines. - Greta: R2 Chancellor + R5 President in Fascist enactments; R5 account conflict with Nadia. - Nadia: R5 Chancellor + R6 President; R5/R6 chain Fascists; R6 flow unresolved; refused next Chancellor. - Rosa: R6 Chancellor produced 3rd Fascist; R1 L/F conflicts with Boris L/L/F; R6 flow unresolved. - Boris: R1 L/L/F conflicts with Rosa L/F; R7 with Ines produced 4th Fascist; claims passed L/F, self-serving. - Ines: R3 Chancellor in Liberal enactment; R7 Chancellor in Fascist enactment; Boris claims she discarded L from L/F. Open questions: - Ines: exact R7 pair/discard; explain discarding Liberal; R3 flow; R4 Greta rationale. - Boris: exact R7 flow; reconcile R1 account. - Greta: R2 cards/R5 reconciliation. - Nadia: R6 exact draw/discard and refusal rationale. - Rosa: R6 flow and R1 reconciliation. Already said: - Exclude Greta/Nadia/Rosa; Lena confirmed Fascist. - Demanded Rosa/R6 audit; supported R6 test; accepted special election. - Promised Ines nomination; demanded disclosures. - Boris–Rosa contradiction; reject Boris–Ines due to contradiction, unaudited Ines, live Hitler risk. - Current: Boris/Ines require exact R7 audit. - New: Boris’s L/F claim does not clear him; either he lied or Ines knowingly chose Fascist; exclude both.

Suspects/evidence: - Lena: confirmed Fascist; R2 with Greta; endorses Boris–Ines. - Greta: R2 Chancellor + R5 President in Fascist enactments; R5 account conflict with Nadia. - Nadia: R5 Chancellor + R6 President; R5/R6 chain Fascists; R6 flow unresolved; refused next Chancellor. - Rosa: R6 Chancellor produced 3rd Fascist; R1 L/F conflicts with Boris L/L/F; R6 flow unresolved. - Boris: R1 L/L/F conflicts with Rosa L/F; R7 with Ines produced 4th Fascist; claims passed L/F, self-serving. - Ines: R3 Chancellor in Liberal enactment; R7 Chancellor in Fascist enactment; claims F/F. Open questions: - Ines: exact R7 pair/discard; explain R3 flow; R4 Greta rationale. - Boris: exact R7 flow; reconcile R1 account. - Greta: R2 cards/R5 reconciliation. - Nadia: R6 exact draw/discard and refusal rationale. - Rosa: R6 flow and R1 reconciliation. Already said: - Exclude Greta/Nadia/Rosa; Lena confirmed Fascist. - Demanded Rosa/R6 audit; supported R6 test; accepted special election. - Promised Ines nomination; demanded disclosures. - Boris–Rosa contradiction; reject Boris–Ines due to contradiction, unaudited Ines, live Hitler risk. - Boris’s L/F claim does not clear him; either he lied or Ines knowingly chose Fascist; exclude both. - R7 government unusable under either account; no trust in Boris or Ines.

Suspects/evidence: - Lena: confirmed Fascist; R2 with Greta; endorsed Boris–Ines. - Greta: R2 Chancellor + R5 President in Fascist enactments; R5 account conflict with Nadia. - Nadia: R5 Chancellor + R6 President; R5/R6 chain Fascists; R6 flow unresolved; refused next Chancellor. - Rosa: R6 Chancellor produced 3rd Fascist; R1 L/F conflicts with Boris L/L/F; R6 flow unresolved. - Boris: R1 L/L/F conflicts with Rosa L/F; R7 with Ines produced 4th Fascist; claims passed L/F, self-serving; now blames Lena’s Ja vote. - Ines: R3 Chancellor in Liberal enactment; R7 Chancellor in Fascist enactment; claims F/F. Open questions: - Ines: exact R7 pair/discard; explain R3 flow; R4 Greta rationale. - Boris: exact R7 flow; reconcile R1 account. - Greta: R2 cards/R5 reconciliation. - Nadia: R6 exact draw/discard and refusal rationale. - Rosa: R6 flow and R1 reconciliation. Already said: - Exclude Greta/Nadia/Rosa; Lena confirmed Fascist. - Demanded Rosa/R6 audit; supported R6 test; accepted special election. - Promised Ines nomination; demanded disclosures. - Boris–Rosa contradiction; reject Boris–Ines due to contradiction, unaudited Ines, live Hitler risk. - Boris’s L/F claim does not clear him; either he lied or Ines knowingly chose Fascist; exclude both. - R7 government unusable under either account; no trust in Boris or Ines. - Lena’s Ja is not an explanation of card flow; Boris and Ines jointly produced the 4th Fascist, and Boris still owes exact R7 disclosure.

Suspects/evidence: - Lena: Greta claims investigation confirmed Fascist; R2 Chancellor with Greta enacted Fascist; Ja vote on risky government unexplained. - Greta: R2 Chancellor + R5 President in Fascist governments; R5 account conflict with Nadia. - Nadia: R5 Chancellor + R6 President; consecutive Fascist enactments; R6 flow unresolved; refused next Chancellor. - Rosa: R6 Chancellor produced 3rd Fascist; R1 L/F conflicts with Boris's R1 L/L/F; R6 flow unresolved. - Boris: R1 account conflicts with Rosa; R7 President with Ines produced 4th Fascist; exact flow owed; L/F claim self-serving. - Ines: R3 Chancellor in Liberal enactment; R7 Chancellor in Fascist enactment; exact R7 pair/discard owed; claims F/F. Open questions: - Boris: exact R7 draw, discard, passed cards; reconcile R1 account. - Ines: exact R7 pair/discard; explain R3 flow and R7 choice. - Lena: rationale for Ja on risky government despite claimed Fascist status. - Greta: R2 cards and R5 reconciliation. - Nadia: R6 exact draw/discard and refusal rationale. - Rosa: R6 flow and R1 reconciliation. Already said aloud: - Exclude Greta, Nadia, Rosa; Lena confirmed Fascist. - Demanded Rosa/R6 audit; supported R6 test; accepted special election. - Promised Ines nomination, then demanded disclosures. - Boris-Rosa contradiction; reject Boris-Ines due contradiction, unaudited Ines, live Hitler risk. - Boris L/F claim does not clear him; either Boris lied or Ines knowingly chose Fascist. - R7 government unusable under either account; no trust in Boris or Ines. - Lena Ja is not card-flow explanation; Boris and Ines jointly produced 4th Fascist; Boris owes exact R7 disclosure.

Suspects/evidence: - Lena: Greta says investigation confirmed Fascist; R2 Chancellor with Greta -> F; Ja on risky government unexplained. - Greta: R2 Chancellor + R5 President in F governments; R5 account conflict with Nadia. - Nadia: R5 Chancellor + R6 President; consecutive F enactments; refused next Chancellor. - Rosa: R6 Chancellor -> 3rd F; R1 L/F conflicts with Boris R1 L/L/F; R6 flow unresolved. - Boris: R1 account conflicts with Rosa; R7 President with Ines -> 4th F; exact flow owed; L/F claim self-serving. - Ines: R3 Chancellor in L enactment; R7 Chancellor in F enactment; exact pair/discard owed; claims F/F. Open questions: - Boris: exact R7 draw/discard/passed cards; reconcile R1. - Ines: exact R7 pair/discard; explain R3 flow and R7 choice. - Lena: rationale for Ja on risky government. - Greta: R2 cards and R5 reconciliation. - Nadia: R6 exact draw/discard and refusal rationale. - Rosa: R6 flow and R1 reconciliation. Already said aloud: - Exclude Greta, Nadia, Rosa; Lena confirmed Fascist. - Demanded Rosa/R6 audit; supported R6 test; accepted special election. - Promised Ines nomination, then demanded disclosures. - Boris-Rosa contradiction; reject Boris-Ines due contradiction, unaudited Ines, live Hitler risk. - Boris L/F claim does not clear him; either Boris lied or Ines knowingly chose F. - R7 government unusable under either account; no trust in Boris or Ines. - Lena Ja is not card-flow explanation; Boris and Ines jointly produced 4th F; Boris owes exact R7 disclosure. - Current: reject Boris/Ines government; require exact R7 flows.

Suspects/evidence: - Lena: Greta says investigation confirmed Fascist; R2 Chancellor with Greta -> F; Ja on risky R7 government unexplained. - Greta: R2 Chancellor + R5 President in F governments; R5 account conflict with Nadia. - Nadia: R5 Chancellor + R6 President; consecutive F enactments; refused next Chancellor. - Rosa: R6 Chancellor -> 3rd F; R1 L/F conflicts with Boris R1 L/L/F; R6 flow unresolved. - Boris: R1 account conflicts with Rosa; R7 President -> 4th F; claims L/F while Ines claims F/F; repeated contradictions, primary suspect. - Ines: R3 Chancellor in L; R7 Chancellor in F; F/F account consistent with stated commitment, R3 flow unresolved. Open questions: - Boris: exact R7 draw/discard/passed cards; reconcile R1. - Ines: exact R7 pair/discard; explain R3 flow. - Lena: rationale for Ja on risky R7. - Greta: R2 cards and R5 reconciliation. - Nadia: R6 exact draw/discard and refusal rationale. - Rosa: R6 flow and R1 reconciliation. Already said aloud: - Exclude Greta, Nadia, Rosa; Lena confirmed Fascist. - Demanded audits; supported R6 test; accepted special election. - Promised Ines nomination, demanded disclosures. - Boris-Rosa contradiction; reject Boris-Ines due contradiction/live Hitler risk. - Boris L/F claim does not clear him; either Boris lied or Ines chose F. - R7 unusable under Boris account; no trust in Boris/Ines. - Lena Ja is not card-flow proof; Boris owes R7 disclosure. New: Ines F/F account follows her commitment; Boris’s L/F claim is unsupported and makes him primary suspect.

Suspects/evidence: - Boris: R7 President -> 4th F; claims L/F while Ines claims F/F; R1 account conflicts with Rosa; primary suspect. - Ines: R7 Chancellor in F; F/F account consistent with commitment; R3 Chancellor in L unresolved. - Lena: Greta investigation confirmed Fascist; R2 Chancellor with Greta -> F; Ja on risky R7 unexplained. - Greta: R2 Chancellor + R5 President in F governments; R5 account conflict with Nadia. - Nadia: R5 Chancellor + R6 President; consecutive F enactments; refused next Chancellor. - Rosa: R6 Chancellor -> 3rd F; R1 L/F conflicts with Boris R1 L/L/F; R6 flow unresolved. Open questions: - Boris: exact R7 draw/discard/passed cards; reconcile R1; execute target rationale. - Ines: exact R7 pair/discard; explain R3 flow. - Lena: rationale for Ja on risky R7. - Greta: R2 cards and R5 reconciliation. - Nadia: R6 exact draw/discard and refusal rationale. - Rosa: R6 flow and R1 reconciliation. Already said aloud: - Exclude Greta, Nadia, Rosa; Lena confirmed Fascist. - Demanded audits; supported R6 test; accepted special election. - Promised Ines nomination, demanded disclosures. - Boris-Rosa contradiction; reject Boris-Ines due contradiction/live Hitler risk. - Boris L/F claim does not clear him; either Boris lied or Ines chose F. - R7 unusable under Boris account; no trust in Boris/Ines. - Lena Ja is not card-flow proof; Boris owes R7 disclosure. - Ines F/F account follows her commitment; Boris L/F unsupported, primary suspect. New: execution power now live; demand Boris execute confirmed Fascist Lena.

Suspects/evidence: - Boris: R7 President -> 4th F; claims L/F while Ines claims F/F; R1 account conflicts with Rosa; primary suspect. - Ines: R7 Chancellor in F; F/F account consistent with commitment; R3 Chancellor in L unresolved. - Lena: Greta investigation identified her Fascist; R2 Chancellor with Greta -> F; Ja on risky R7 unexplained. - Greta: R2 Chancellor + R5 President in F governments; R5 account conflict with Nadia. - Nadia: R5 Chancellor + R6 President; consecutive F enactments; refused next Chancellor. - Rosa: R6 Chancellor -> 3rd F; R1 L/F conflicts with Boris R1 L/L/F; R6 flow unresolved. Open questions: - Boris: exact R7 draw/discard/passed cards; reconcile R1; execute target rationale. - Ines: exact R7 pair/discard; explain R3 flow. - Lena: rationale for Ja on risky R7. - Greta: R2 cards and R5 reconciliation. - Nadia: R6 exact draw/discard and refusal rationale. - Rosa: R6 flow and R1 reconciliation. Already said aloud: - Exclude Greta, Nadia, Rosa; Lena confirmed Fascist. - Demanded audits; supported R6 test; accepted special election. - Promised Ines nomination, demanded disclosures. - Boris-Rosa contradiction; reject Boris-Ines due contradiction/live Hitler risk. - Boris L/F claim does not clear him; either Boris lied or Ines chose F. - Lena Ja is not card-flow proof; Boris owes R7 disclosure. - Ines F/F account follows commitment; Boris L/F unsupported, primary suspect. New: - Support executing Lena; Boris refusing or choosing another target is suspicious.

Suspects/evidence: - Lena: Greta investigation identified her Fascist; R2 Chancellor with Greta -> F; Ja on risky R7; execute priority. - Boris: R7 President -> F; L/F claim conflicts with Ines F/F; R1 account conflicts with Rosa; primary suspect if he protects Lena. - Ines: R7 Chancellor in F; F/F account consistent with commitment; R3 Chancellor in L unresolved; proposing Rosa risks sparing Lena. - Greta: R2 Chancellor + R5 President in F governments; R5 account conflicts with Nadia. - Nadia: R5 Chancellor + R6 President; consecutive F enactments; refused next Chancellor. - Rosa: R6 Chancellor -> 3rd F; R6 flow unresolved; R1 reconciliation needed. Open questions: - Boris owes exact R7 draw/discard/passed cards; reconcile R1; target rationale. - Ines owes exact R7 pair/discard; explain R3 flow. - Lena owes rationale for Ja on R7. - Greta owes R2 cards and R5 reconciliation. - Nadia owes R6 exact draw/discard and refusal rationale. - Rosa owes R6 flow and R1 reconciliation. Already said aloud: - Exclude Greta, Nadia, Rosa; Lena confirmed Fascist. - Demanded audits; supported R6 test; accepted special election. - Promised Ines nomination; demanded disclosures. - Boris-Rosa contradiction; reject Boris-Ines due contradiction/live Hitler risk. - Boris L/F claim does not clear him; either Boris lied or Ines chose F. - Lena Ja is not card-flow proof; Boris owes R7 disclosure. - Ines F/F account follows commitment; Boris L/F unsupported, primary suspect. - Support executing Lena; Boris refusing or choosing another target suspicious.